Answers
Their main goals were to offer married women the rights to their own property, wages, child custody, control over their bodies, and fair opportunities to education and employment.
How would you define employment?In most cases, the term "employment" refers to the condition of holding a paid job of having employed.
What kind of employment is that?Work can be, for instance: a part-time hourly position that pays a set sum for each hour performed. high employment in which workers are paid a wage and other perks from their employers in exchange for doing the tasks or other work assigned to them that is necessary for a specific role.
To learn more about employment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you'd be successful prosecuting using this rule.
Answers
Hello. You did not report the case Keith is involved in, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor can use the felony murder rule to prosecute someone as possibly guilty of a first-degree murder. This is because the felony murder rule states that there are murders that occur accidentally, or during dangerous activities, and these murders are classified as first-degree murder.
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
Answers
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
b) 14 x (-12) +14 (-8)
Answers
Answer:
-168+(-112)
Explanation:
-168-112= -280 ,hope you like it
Answer:
14×(-12)+14(-8)
14×-12+14×-8
-280
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
If no higher or lower speed is posted, the speed limit within city limits is 50kph (31 mph) for all vehicles, except for vehicles with a lower speed limitation.
Answers
True: If no higher lower speed is posted the speed limit within the city limits is 50kph for all vehicles except for vehicles with a lower speed limitation.
Speed Limit simply refers to the top posted speed that any vehicle is allowed to travel on a road or highway. Depending on the national speed unit standard, the speed limit shown on the speed signboard is the maximum speed allowed on the road in kph or mph. The maximum speed for all vehicles inside city borders, barring those having a lower speed restriction, is 50 kph (31 mph) if neither a higher nor a lower limit is stated. Thus, the given statement is true.
High-speed limits are typically provided on National Roads, Motorways, and Freeways; these limits are posted at each location where those roads enter the system, as well as at regular intervals with repeater speed signposts. Until a lower speed is suggested due to temporary traffic control during ongoing road maintenance or construction, the speed restrictions over the entire stretch of that road are often pretty steady.
To know more about speed limits, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28488266
#SPJ4
what does the lot and block system use to develop a property’s legal description?
Answers
The lot and block system is a common method used to legally describe a property's location and boundaries. This system relies on two main components: the lot number and the block number.
A block is a defined area of land that is typically bordered by streets, while a lot is a specific parcel of land within that block. The lot and block numbers are assigned by the local government and recorded in official records. To develop a property's legal description using the lot and block system, the lot and block numbers are typically referenced in conjunction with a subdivision map or plat. This map outlines the exact boundaries and dimensions of each lot within the block. The legal description will typically include the block and lot numbers, the name of the subdivision, and any other relevant information such as easements or restrictions. Overall, the lot and block system provides a standardized and precise method for describing property locations and boundaries, which is essential for legal and financial purposes.
to know about lot and block system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28197288
#SPJ11
Why do you think a "reliable, scholarly
Source is always stressed in academic
writing?
Answers
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
Answers
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
To check the completeness assertion for Contingencies, the auditor sent a letter of inquiry to the client's attorney. The Attorney Letter was received by mail on February 25, Year 2.
Barlow & King, LLP
February 23, Year 2
Forest & Glen CPAs,
We advise you that at and since December 31, Year 1, we have not been engaged to give substantive attention to, or represent Shipps Machinery in connection with any pending or threatened litigation, claims, or assessments, except as follows:
A. Nathaniel v. Shipps Machinery. This matter commenced in September, Year 1. The plaintiff is a former employee who alleges work-related injuries sustained when the plaintiff fell on the factory floor. The plaintiff alleges that a lack of routine maintenance caused a leak, which leak led to his fall and injuries. The plaintiff is demanding $400,000. We believe that is probable that there will be a loss in the range of $200,000–$300,000. There is no amount in the range that is a better estimate than any other amount within the range.
We are unaware of any other litigation, claims, or assessments against Shipps Machinery at this time.
Sincerely,
Barlow & King, LLP
(1) Is the evidence collected sufficient and appropriate? A. Yes____ B. No_____
(2) Please determine the auditor's next likely action by selecting the appropriate option from the list provided at the bottom of this question (Options A-J):____________
List for the auditor's next likely actions:
A. No further action is needed.
B. Accounts payable confirmations should be sent to a sample of vendors with large outstanding balances at year-end.
C. Confirmation responses received electronically should be verified by calling the sender and the sender is also requested to mail the original confirmation directly to the auditor.
D. Confirmations should be sent to an additional sample of customers for further evidence.
E. Engage an audit specialist to review lawsuit and determine independent probability of loss.
F. Inquiries of management should be made as to the $0 balance account, as this may be a sign of fraud.
G. Propose an adjusting journal entry for the maintenance expense incorrectly excluded from Year 1.
H. Request that the attorney send an exact amount of probable loss.
I. Separate confirmation request should be sent to request information regarding any loans or liens outstanding.
J. To test for completeness, perform a search for unrecorded liabilities.
Answers
No, the evidence collected is not sufficient and appropriate. This is because the attorney letter received by the auditor only covers one contingency claim and does not cover all contingencies that are existing.
The auditor's next likely action should be E. Engage an audit specialist to review the lawsuit and determine independent probability of loss.There are certain evidential procedures that an auditor undertakes to verify that financial statements comply with the auditing standards. One such procedure is the completeness assertion for contingencies. The completeness assertion implies that the entity should disclose all liabilities that exist as of the balance sheet date.In the given case, to check the completeness assertion for contingencies, the auditor sent a letter of inquiry to the client's attorney. However, the attorney letter only covers one contingency claim and does not cover all contingencies that are existing. Therefore, the evidence collected is not sufficient and appropriate.To address this, the auditor should engage an audit specialist to review the lawsuit and determine independent probability of loss. This is because the attorney has not given an exact amount of probable loss. As an auditor, it is important to get all the required evidence to satisfy yourself that the financial statements are free from material misstatements.
To Know More about specialist visit:
brainly.com/question/28233540
#SPJ11
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs" Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount
Answers
The way a court will resolve this dispute is e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
What makes a binding contract?For a contract to be considered legally binding on the parties, it must comply with the elements of contracts, including:Offer and acceptanceConsiderationMutual intentionLegalityCapacity.What is consideration?
A consideration is a promise of some valuable thing offered by a promissor in exchange for something of value by a promisee.
The rules of consideration ensure that there is a mutual agreement between the promisor and the promisee about its value and also in the eyes of the law.
Thus, in this case, the court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
Learn more about vague considerations in contracts at https://brainly.com/question/17083291
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
Hanna accepts Mayra's offer but later, a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?
a) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
b) The court will determine that Hanna pays only the figures mentioned in the contract.
c) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
d) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract
The Victorian legislation which provides guidelines for solicitors to disclose information about costs.
Answers
Answer:
costs disclosure
Explanation:
The Victorian legislation provides guidelines for legal fee disclosures by solicitors to their clients. The legislation requires that solicitors must disclose legal costs in a cost disclosure statement as soon as they engage a client. This prevents the penalties or invalidity of a legal claim to costs. Exceptions may however apply where legal costs do not exceed $750 or client is government or commercial entity.
PLLS helpp
Which of the following is not an interest group?
the media
a civil rights organization
a union
an industry lobby
Answers
Answer:
I would say The Media but you can try to find the best answer by your self from the definition below.
Explanation:
An interest group is on the basis of one or more shared concerns, attempts to influence public policy in its favour.
Please help me??
after learning about the correctional system in the united states, do you agree or disagree with prison privatization? do you think it would work for one type of facility (i.e. local, state, or federal) more than another? explain your stance.
Answers
Prison privatization helps the government to reduce costs associated with running a correctional facilities, and it will work for any type of facilities local, state, or federal correctional facilities.
Prison privatization refers to the transfer of ownership and operation of prisons from the government to private, for-profit companies. Proponents of prison privatization argue that private prisons can save money by operating more efficiently and effectively than government-run facilities.
In terms of which type of facility might be more suited to privatization, this would depend on factors such as specific laws and policies of the jurisdiction. Ultimately, while privatization work for any level may it be local, state, or federal facilities, the decision to privatize prisons, is a complex one that involves balancing a range of considerations, including cost, efficiency, accountability, and the impact on stakeholders such as inmates, staff, and the community.
To learn more about prison privatization visit: https://brainly.com/question/16901807
#SPJ4
Which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? Group of answer choices Compensatory damages Liquidation damages Punitive damages Incidental damages Exemplary damages
Answers
The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.
Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.
In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.
Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11
Which of the following requires state governments to spend their own money to meet standards imposed on them by the federal government?
a. categorical grants
b. block grants
c. program grants
d. formula grants
e. unfunded mandates
Answers
A correct answer is an option (e), i.e., unfunded mandates. Unfunded mandates are federal requirements imposed on state and local governments without providing funding to cover the cost of complying with these requirements.
This means that state governments must spend their own resources to meet the standards imposed by the federal government without receiving financial assistance to do so. On the other hand, categorical, block, program, and formula grants are forms of federal financial assistance provided to state and local governments to help them carry out specific programs and activities.
These grants come with specific conditions and requirements, but they also provide funding to help states meet them. Unfunded mandates burden state and local budgets, while grants provide funding to support specific programs and activities.
To learn more about unfunded mandates, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13038480
#SPJ4
A recession causes the demand for jelly beans to fall. What happens to equilibrium price
and equilibrium quantity of jelly beans?
O Price Increases and Quantity Decreases
O Price Decreases and Quantity Increases
O Price and Quantity Decrease
Price and Quantity Increase
Answers
As a result of the recession causing the demand for jelly beans to fall, the effect on the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity is Price and Quantity Decrease.
When demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
The reason this happens is that as less people demand the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
What is the equilibrium price?The equilibrium price in a market refers to the price of goods and services where the quantity supplied in the market is equal to the quantity demanded.
If demand falls in a market for a certain good, then the demand curve would shift to the left. As a result of this shift, the demand curve would intersect the supply curve at a lower price and quantity level.
This is as a result of less people demanding the jelly beans, suppliers will produce less jelly beans and reduce the prices to encourage more people to buy which leads to a fall in both equilibrium price and quantity.
Find out more on the effect of a fall in demand at https://brainly.com/question/24087897
#SPJ1
which best describes why china introduced the one-child policy?to eliminate population growthto reverse population growthto increase population growthto slow population growthbritish officialsmembers of the dietthe allied governmentsus army officers
Answers
China introduced the one-child policy to slow population growth. In the 1970s, China faced an exponential increase in population, which was seen as a threat to the country's economic development and social stability.
The government feared that a rapidly growing population would lead to food and resource shortages, high unemployment rates, and increased poverty levels.
To combat these issues, the one-child policy was implemented in 1979 to limit each family to only one child. The policy was enforced through fines, penalties, and forced abortions or sterilizations.
While the policy did slow population growth, it also had unintended consequences, such as a gender imbalance and an aging population. The policy was officially ended in 2015.
To know more about population growth visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18415071
#SPJ11
Law passed by legislatures and written into books of code is called __________ law.
Answers
Law passed by legislatures and written into books of code is called statutory law.
Statutory law refers to the laws created and enacted by legislative bodies, such as national or state legislatures, and is typically organized and codified in written form.
It is distinct from other sources of law, such as common law, which is developed through judicial decisions, and constitutional law, which is derived from a country's constitution.
Statutory law serves as the primary source of legal rules and regulations in many legal systems, providing a framework for governing various aspects of society, including criminal offenses, civil disputes, contracts, property rights, and more.
To know more about statutory law refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/8868792
#SPJ11
10
Select the correct answer.
What is physical evidence?
OA
matter
OB
elements
O C.
atoms
OD. compounds
O E mixtures
Answers
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
Answers
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
Q5.
Private security officers are not restricted by provisions of the U.S. Constitution
unless they are working in collaboration with the government.
True or
False
Answers
Trace was from Nebraska and sued the Iowa State Bureau of Investigation (ISBI) based on alleged violations of Trace’s civil rights by ISBI agents. Trace sued under the federal Civil Rights Act. His lawsuit was for $70,000. In which of the following courts should Trace file his lawsuit and why?
Multiple Choice
Iowa state court because he is suing a state agency.
Iowa federal court because of federal diversity of citizenship jurisdiction.
Nebraska state court because jurisdiction must be in the state of the plaintiff..
Iowa federal court because of federal question jurisdiction.
Answers
Trace should file his lawsuit in Iowa federal court because of federal question jurisdiction. The federal Civil Rights Act is a federal law, and therefore, the case involves a federal question.
Federal question jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear cases involving questions of federal law. Since Trace's lawsuit is based on alleged violations of his civil rights under the federal Civil Rights Act, the case falls under federal question jurisdiction and should be filed in a federal court.
Additionally, the case should be filed in Iowa federal court because the alleged violations occurred in Iowa and the defendant, the Iowa State Bureau of Investigation, is located in Iowa.
For more similar questions on jurisdiction:
brainly.com/question/16004206
#SPJ11
Required information
Skip to question
[Revenge] Kelsie, a first-year law student, slipped on a freshly-mopped floor while walking to class. She bumped into Burgess, another first-year law student, breaking his glasses. He was very angry with Kelsie and slashed all of her car tires, causing damages of $1,500. Burgess also decided to sue Kelsie for negligence claiming damages of $300 for his broken glasses. He decided that he already knew all about the law and did not need a lawyer. Burgess sued Kelsie in state court. Kelsie, in the same lawsuit, brought an action against Burgess for slashing her tires. At the trial in state court, Kelsie told the judge that a friend, Aimee, told Kelsie that she saw Burgess slash all of Kelsie's tires. The judge disallowed Kelsie's testimony on that issue. Aimee also came to court and testified about seeing Burgess slashing all of Kelsie’s tires. The state court judge ruled in favor of Kelsie awarding her $1,500 in damages. Burgess said that he was not giving up and that he would seek double damages on appeal in federal court. Kelsie and Burgess live in different states when not attending school. After the trial, Kelsie reported Burgess' action of slashing her tires to the police, who said that they would proceed with a criminal action against Burgess. Burgess goes to see Alex, a recent graduate who had just passed the bar, and asked Alex to represent him in a federal court appeal.
Burgess asked Alex what his chances are regarding an appeal filed in federal court. What should Alex tell Burgess?
Multiple Choice
He should tell Burgess that a federal appeal looks promising but he would not be able to get double damages.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal looks promising but he would have to prove Kelsie was negligent.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal looks good if the law school admits fault in leaving water on the floor.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal is not allowed because there are not enough damages at issue.
He should tell Burgess that a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
Answers
Option e. He should tell Burgess that a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
In general, federal courts have limited jurisdiction and hear cases that involve federal law, constitutional issues, or disputes between parties from different states. The case between Kelsie and Burgess, which involves a slip-and-fall accident and property damage, does not raise any federal law or constitutional issues. It is a state law matter and falls within the jurisdiction of the state court.
The fact that Kelsie and Burgess live in different states when not attending school does not automatically grant federal jurisdiction over the case. The location of their residence outside of school is not relevant to the jurisdiction of the federal court. The case arose from a local incident within the state where the school is located, and therefore, it should be resolved within the state court system.
Burgess's desire for double damages on appeal does not change the jurisdictional requirements. Unless there are specific federal law or constitutional issues involved, a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
Alex should explain to Burgess that pursuing an appeal in federal court is not an option for this particular case. Therefore the correct option is E
Know more about federal court here:
https://brainly.com/question/30408538
#SPJ8
Speeding is one of our most prevalent factors in motor vehicle crashes true or false
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
if an officer is sued in court the officer may invovke _________ meaning the officer cannot be held liable for discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties
A.offical immunity
B.good faith immunity
C.discretionary immunity
D.officer immunity
Answers
When an officer is sued in court, the officer may invoke Option B. good faith immunity, meaning the officer cannot be held liable for discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties.
The term "immunity" refers to the freedom or exemption from legal action. Immunity, in general, is used to protect government officials from civil lawsuits and criminal charges brought against them for doing their job. When an individual is sued in court, they can be granted immunity from certain lawsuits if the legal system determines that the individual is acting in the line of duty or is following proper legal guidelines.
Good faith immunity: Good faith immunity is a kind of immunity that exempts public officials from legal action if they made a reasonable decision based on the information they had available. This immunity protects officials from civil and criminal liability if they acted in good faith when making their decision and used their discretion appropriately. This type of immunity is usually reserved for law enforcement officials who are making decisions during the course of their job duties and who are expected to use their discretion to make decisions based on the information available to them.
Discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties are duties that are considered necessary for the officer to do their job effectively. This immunity is designed to protect officers from being sued by individuals who are unhappy with the decisions they made during the course of their job duties. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Know more about Immunity here:
https://brainly.com/question/29793582
#SPJ8
you switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do
Answers
Answer:
I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die
Explanation:
suppose now that a firm that produces for this market hires a private security force, reducing crime not only in their factory, but also in the small town in which it is located. this is an example of market failure due to an externality .
Answers
When a firm hires a private security force to protect its property and reduce crime, it not only benefits the firm itself but also positively impacts the surrounding small town. This phenomenon is an example of market failure due to a positive externality.
A positive externality occurs when an action by a party generates benefits for others who are not directly involved in the transaction or decision-making process. In this case, the firm's decision to hire a private security force creates an indirect benefit for the small town's residents by reducing crime levels in their community. Since the firm does not receive any compensation for these additional benefits, the market fails to allocate resources efficiently, leading to a market failure. This market failure occurs because the firm has no incentive to consider the broader benefits to the community when deciding to hire a private security force. The firm's primary goal is to protect its assets and employees, and any positive externalities are incidental.
To address this market failure, government intervention or other policies could be implemented to encourage firms to consider the broader impacts of their actions on society, ensuring that resources are allocated more efficiently and positive externalities are maximized.
Learn more about private security force here:
https://brainly.com/question/31343588
#SPJ11
Which one of these word is not a sign of intoxication clumsiness slurred speech aggression coherent statement
Answers
Answer: Good Morning
Explanation: If someone says good morning I do not automatically think they are intoxicated.
40. Sarah has been asked to explain the "right-to-know" law to her coworkers in the forensics lab. How will she MOST accurately explain this
law?
All lab workers must know how to operate a handgun.
Scientists are informed of any potentially dangerous materials.
Forensic scientists are told when criminals are in the building.
No scientists have to testify in a criminal case if they choose not to.
Answers
Answer:
Pretty sure its B. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Explanation:
This is the definition on Wikipedia.
"Right to know", in the context of United States workplace and community environmental law, is the legal principle that the individual has the right to know the chemicals to which they may be exposed in their daily living.
Jeff and his coworkers frequently visit a local bar on their way home from their second-shift factory jobs. They are anxious to reach the bar on this particular night because their favorite NFL team is playing. Jeff hopes they will arrive in time to view the fourth quarter of the game. As he enters the bar, he notes a group of noisy, obnoxious rival fans who have had too many drinks. Jeff asks the group to quiet down so he can hear the game. He is immediately approached by members of the group who ask if he wants to make an issue of the game. Before Jeff can answer, one member of the group throws a punch. Within minutes, a full bar brawl ensues. Jeff ends up with a fractured skull, which results in brain damage. What type of lawsuit will Jeff be able to file against his aggressors
Answers
Answer:
Civil
Explanation:
A civil lawsuit is characterized as a judicial process where a person tries to hold another person responsible for an injury to which he or she was a victim, or for some unlawful act. In the case above, we can state that Jeff will try to hold his attacker responsible for the brain damage he has had. If Jeff wins the case, the attacker will have to compensate him for the amount that the court determines. The greater Jeff's damage, the greater the compensation.