What was some of Abraham Lincoln's accomplishments as president?
Answers
2.ended slavery
Related Questions
Match the following vocabulary words.
Answers
2.Dynamo
3.Microscope
4.Expansion
5.Industry
6.Generator
7.Animalcules
8.Cotton Jin
Answer:
1. gunpowder
2. dynamo
3. microscope
4. expansion
5. industry
6. generator
7. animalcules
8. cotton gin
How did the concept of the balance of power change from the eighteenth century to the nineteenth century?
Answers
1. Transition from Dynastic Balance to National Balance: In the eighteenth century, the balance of power was primarily centered around the interests of European monarchies and maintaining a equilibrium between major dynasties. However, in the nineteenth century, the focus shifted towards the idea of national balance. It involved considering the interests and aspirations of emerging nation-states and their relative power in international relations.
2. Rise of Nationalism: The nineteenth century witnessed a surge in nationalist movements and the desire for self-determination among various ethnic and cultural groups. This shift towards nationalism led to the redrawing of borders, the formation of new nations, and a more complex landscape in terms of power dynamics.
3. Industrialization and Technological Advancements: The advent of the Industrial Revolution and technological advancements in the nineteenth century had a profound impact on military capabilities and the balance of power. Nations with advanced industrial and technological capacities gained an advantage, and this led to a reconfiguration of power relations.
4. Colonialism and Imperialism: The nineteenth century was marked by the expansion of colonial empires and imperialism. European powers, such as Great Britain, France, and Germany, acquired vast territories overseas, which further altered the balance of power. The competition for colonial possessions also influenced the balance of power dynamics among the major European nations.
5. Concert of Europe to Multipolar System: In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the Concert of Europe emerged as a mechanism for maintaining the balance of power after the Napoleonic Wars. It involved regular conferences among major powers to address common issues. However, as the nineteenth century progressed, the balance of power shifted towards a multipolar system, with multiple significant players exerting influence and competing for power.
Overall, the concept of the balance of power evolved from a focus on dynastic equilibrium to a consideration of national interests and the impact of industrialization, nationalism, colonialism, and imperialism. The transition from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century saw a shift in power dynamics and the emergence of new geopolitical realities.
The concept of the balance of power shifted from a European-centric focus in the eighteenth century to a global perspective in the nineteenth century.
The balance of power in the eighteenth century was mostly centred on the European continent. To prevent any one state from becoming more powerful, the major European powers—including France, Britain, Austria, and Prussia—sought to preserve a delicate balance among themselves. Through diplomatic pacts, territorial changes, and sporadic conflicts, this equilibrium was frequently attained. The main goals were to keep Europe stable and prevent any one state from dominating the continent too much.
However, the pressures of imperialism, industrialisation, and globalisation led to the concept of the balance of power expanding beyond of Europe in the nineteenth century. A more even distribution of power around the globe resulted from European powers starting to spread their influence and colonial holdings abroad. The traditional European hegemony was put to the test by the emergence of new powers like the United States and Japan.
The Industrial Revolution also gave countries new economic and military capabilities, which altered the dynamics of power. Steam-powered ships and railroads facilitated international trade and transportation, further shifting the balance of power.
The European balance of power was still emphasised during the Congress of Vienna in 1815, which sought to redrew the map of Europe following the Napoleonic Wars. However, as conventional empires faded, nation-states expanded, and new global power dynamics emerged over the nineteenth century, the geopolitical landscape changed.
Overall, the idea of the balance of power changed from a regionally focused European perspective in the eighteenth century to a more complex and global vision in the nineteenth century, reflecting the shifting dynamics of international relations and the expanding interconnections among nations worldwide.
To know more about European powers,
https://brainly.com/question/30272015
I brain you ;)
Can a state Constitution ever be more important than the U.S. Constitution? Yes/no and why?
If one half (1/2) of the original 13 states had approved the Constitution would it have become law?? Yes/no and why?
If your answer is good i will brain you heart yo and give you 5 stars <33 Good Luck
Answers
Number 2: No because we would have to have 1/3 majority of votes from the original 13 states. So therefore, we would not have had any constitution to keep us in tact
In World War II, Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States joined together as the _?_.
Manhattan Project
Allied Nations
Nisei
Axis Powers
Answers
Answer:
Allied Nations
Explanation:
One thing that has helped to perpetuate inequality in South America from colonial times until today is the persistence of...
Answers
During colonial times, South America was divided into a number of distinct social classes, with the Spanish colonizers at the top and indigenous and African slaves at the bottom. This social hierarchy persisted after independence, and many countries in South America continue to be marked by significant income and wealth inequality.
Other factors that have contributed to the persistence of inequality in South America include historical patterns of economic exploitation, discrimination against marginalized groups, and the concentration of political and economic power in the hands of a small elite. These factors have all played a role in shaping the economic and social landscape of the region and have contributed to the ongoing challenges faced by many people in South America.
Which statements explain what life was like in Rome during the time of Julius Caesar Choose three that are correct.
A) Few people were living in the cities.
B) Most farmers sold their farms to the wealthy and moved to Rome
C) The city was dirty and overcrowded.
D) There was very little work because the wealthy used slaves to do the work on farms.
Answers
Match these Items:
White settlers and Black Africans
main groups of conflict in southern Africa
2 .
What Africa needs to become prosperous and modern
apartheid
3 .
South African system of separating races
Swaziland, Lesotho, Botswana
4 .
African kingdoms that become British Protectorates
peace and good government
5 .
Resources of southern Africa
gold, diamonds, copper, fertile land
Answers
White settlers and Black Africans - main groups of conflict in southern Africa
What Africa needs to become prosperous and modern - peace and good government
South African system of separating races - apartheid
African kingdoms that become British Protectorates - Swaziland, Lesotho, Botswana
Resources of southern Africa - gold, diamonds, copper, fertile land
What Africa needs to become prosperous and modern - peace and good government
South African system of separating races - apartheid
African kingdoms that become British Protectorates - Swaziland, Lesotho, Botswana
Resources of southern Africa - gold, diamonds, copper, fertile land
What was Buddha's contribution to Indian civilization? Do you think he has contributions that still stick around today? Provide examples.
Answers
Answer:
One of the biggest contributions of Buddhism to India in the political field was that it promoted a sense of national feelings amongst the Indians. It not only shattered the dominance of the caste system which stood in the way of the achievement of this unity but also gave a death blow to the dominance of Brahmans.
Explanation:
The greatest contribution of Buddhism was the establishment of a simple religion which could be easily understood and followed by the common people. In this religion, rites, rituals, yajnas and caste had no place. According to K. M. Panikar, “To the common man this (Buddhism) was indeed a new gospel.
The Green Corn Rebellion began as an effort to protest against
A rising corn and wheat prices
B. falling corn and wheat prices
C. American involvement in the war
D. American neutrality in the war
Answers
20. Suppose you recently visited a Heian noble family in their home. Write a brief thank-you letter to your hosts. Your letter should include the following:
• a statement of appreciation and thanks
• specific descriptions of the house and furnishings
• specific information about the lord and lady
• specific information about activities or entertainment during the visit
DON'T GEUSS OR I'LL REPORT
Answers
Answer:
Actually, it's English but not history
Explanation:
No explanation to this
I had a wonderful time during my stay at your home, and I will always cherish the memories of my time with you. Thank you again for your generosity and hospitality, and I look forward to visiting you again in the future.
How to write the thank-you latter?Dear Lord and Lady of the Heian noble family,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my deepest appreciation and gratitude for the warm hospitality you extended to me during my recent visit to your home.
Your home is truly a marvel, with its exquisite gardens and intricate architectural designs. I was especially taken by the beautifully decorated sliding doors and ornate screens, which showcase your impeccable taste and style.
I was equally impressed by your graciousness and kindness, and I must say that I am honored to have had the opportunity to spend time with you. Your knowledge of poetry, art, and music is truly remarkable, and I was inspired by the conversations we had about these topics.
The entertainment during my visit was truly unforgettable, from the elegant koto performance to the mesmerizing tea ceremony. I also enjoyed the traditional dance performance and the opportunity to participate in calligraphy.
Sincerely,
ABC
Learn more about memories here:
https://brainly.com/question/12698791
#SPJ2
Why was Abraham important? Why did the Hebrews leave Mesopotamia & settle in Canaan?
Answers
Abraham was im.bortant because Abraham was the first Hebrew patriarch and is revered in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. According to the Bible, he was called by God to journey to a new land, where he founded a new nation.
The Hebrews left Mesoptamia because According to the biblical book of Genesis, Abraham left Ur, in Mesopotamia, because God called him to found a new nation in an undesignated land that he later learned was Canaan. He obeyed unquestioningly the commands of God, from whom he received repeated promises and a covenant that his “seed” would inherit the land.
hoped that helped
What decided how many votes each state had in the Senate and House of Representatives?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The allocation of votes for each state in the Senate and House of Representatives is determined by different factors specified in the United States Constitution. Let's break down the details for each chamber:
1. Senate:
In the Senate, each state is represented by two senators, regardless of the state's population size. This principle is based on the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It was a compromise between the Virginia Plan, which proposed representation based on population, and the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for each state.
The idea behind providing equal representation in the Senate is to ensure that smaller states have an equal say in the legislative process, preventing larger states from dominating decision-making solely based on their population.
2. House of Representatives:
The allocation of votes in the House of Representatives is based on the population of each state. The U.S. Census, which is conducted every ten years, determines the population of each state. The Constitution mandates that seats in the House be apportioned among the states based on their respective populations.
To distribute the seats fairly, a process called apportionment takes place. The method currently used is known as the "method of equal proportions" or the "Huntington-Hill method." This method, named after mathematician Edward V. Huntington and statistician Joseph A. Hill, is implemented by the U.S. Census Bureau.
The apportionment process begins by assigning the first seat to each state, then determining the priority values for the remaining seats. These priority values are calculated using a formula that accounts for the population of each state and the number of seats already allocated. The state with the highest priority value receives the next seat, and the process continues until all seats are assigned.
It's worth noting that the total number of seats in the House of Representatives is fixed at 435, as established by the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929. This number is divided among the states based on their population, ensuring that representation is roughly proportional.
In summary, the allocation of votes in the Senate provides equal representation for all states, with each state having two senators. The allocation of votes in the House of Representatives is based on population size, with seats distributed among the states through an apportionment process that considers the results of the U.S. Census. This system aims to balance the influence of smaller and larger states in the legislative process.
In "The Road Not Taken" What does the author mean by "Ages and Ages Hence" ??
Answers
Answer:
The author meant" When I'm old and telling stories about my past"
i need help with these.
What three things can the government do to influence economic activity?
what is the most likely effect of government tax increases? Why?
Answers
I hope this is helpful
HELPPP ME PLSSSS ✏️✏️
Answers
Answer:
Freedom of assembly
Explanation:
the protest is shpwing many people assembling together so it is the most related
write 3 sentences that describe the relationship between the native americans and the colonists of new england
Answers
Three statements that describes the relationships between the native Americans and the colonists are:
Mutual HostileTradeWhen the colonists first moved into native American settlements, the natives first attempted to have a mutual and friendly relationship with them.
This failed because with time the settlers wanted the Natives to give up their homes and lands to them. Their continuous expansion angered the colonists. The hostilities led to wars.
The colonists of new England and the natives before they had their conflicts engaged in trades. They traded furs for guns.
Read more on https://brainly.in/question/23653278?referrer=searchResults
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST The items in the Fact Bank list the achievements, beliefs, and characteristics of women who
played major roles in the woman’s movement during the 1800s. Write the appropriate letters on
the line next to each name. Some of the letters will be used more than once.
Lucretia Mott _______________________
Elizabeth Cady Stanton _______________________
Angelina and Sarah Grimke _______________________
Sojourner Truth _______________________
Susan B. Anthony _______________________
Emma Willard _______________________
Mary Lyon _______________________
Elizabeth Blackwell _______________________
Harriet Tubman _______________________
Dorothea Dix _______________________
Fact Bank
A. suffrage for women
B. Mount Holyoke Female Seminary
C. abolitionist
D. “conductor” of the Underground
Railroad
E. graduated from Geneva College at
the head of her class
F. Quaker
G. spoke out about poor living conditions
for mentally ill and for prisoners
H. Seneca Falls Convention
I. Daughters of Temperance
J. Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery
Society
K. improvements in women’s education
L. spoke out publicly against slavery
Answers
Answer:
Lucretia Mott ---- Daughters of Temperance
Elizabeth Cady Stanton ---- Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society
Angelina and Sarah Grimke ---- Daughters of Temperance
Sojourner Truth ---- Quaker
Susan B. Anthony ---- suffrage for women
Emma Willard ---- improvements in women’s education
Mary Lyon ---- Seneca Falls Convention
Elizabeth Blackwell ---- spoke out about poor living conditions
for mentally ill and for prisoners
Harriet Tubman ----“conductor” of the Underground
Railroad
Dorothea Dix ----abolitionist
Explanation:
:)
The correct matches for the items in the Fact Bank lists the achievements, beliefs, and characteristics of women who played major roles in the woman’s movement during the 1800s are mentioned below.
Who was Lucretia Mott?Lucretia Mott was an abolitionist, women's rights campaigner, and social reformer who lived in the United States. When she was rejected from the World Anti-Slavery Convention in London in 1840, she conceived the notion of altering the role of women in society.
The correct matches are as follows:-
Lucretia Mott —— Temperance's DaughtersPhiladelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society, Elizabeth Cady StantonSarah Grimke and Angelina Grimke —— Temperance's DaughtersQuaker Sojourner TruthSusan B. Anthony —— women's suffrageEmma Willard —- advancements in female educationSeneca Falls Convention —— Mary LyonElizabeth Blackwell —- stood up against horrible housing circumstances for mentally ill people and inmates.Harriet Tubman's ——The Underground Railroad's "conductor"Dorothea Dix --- an abolitionist.Therefore, it can be concluded that The proper matches for the items in the Fact Bank are listed above, and they include the achievements, beliefs, and qualities of women who played key roles in the women's movement throughout the 1800s.
Learn more about Lucretia Mott here:
https://brainly.com/question/1463847
#SPJ2
plz help!!!!!
Which type of government does Swaziland have currently?
monarchy
one-party
democracy
socialism
Answers
Answer:
monarchy
Explanation:
hope the answer was helpful
what is the strongest unifier of a culture? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Culture has the ability to both unify (or bring us together in harmony) and divide us. Cultural divide refers to the factors that create rifts in our society and can make it more difficult for people to live happily together. Mass media connects us through social networking platforms.
Answer:
The one bond that unites most is the army, in which all of them (except the orthodox and the Arabs) serve together.
Which statements were a factor in the decline of Sumer?
Select Two correct answers.
Nomads invaded Sumerian city-states.
Salinization of the soil occurred.
The cultivated soil had poor drainage.
A drought caused poor crop production.
Answers
BRAINLIEST FOR THE CORRECCT ANSWERS!!!!!! How does the rule of law affect society? Check all that apply.
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
B. It always prevents lawmakers from abusing power.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
D. It governs how policies are created.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
Answers
The correct options are:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
Explanation:
The rule of law refers to the idea that everyone is equal under the law and that no one is above it. It helps to promote fairness and justice in society by providing a framework for resolving disputes and holding people accountable for their actions.
Here are the options that correctly describe how the rule of law affects society:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes. - The rule of law sets a standard for how people should behave and encourages them to follow the law to avoid consequences.
C. It ensures the separation of powers. - The rule of law helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful by ensuring that each branch has its responsibilities and limitations.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers. - The rule of law requires that lawmakers follow the same laws as everyone else, preventing them from abusing their power and ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions.
Option B is incorrect because the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing their power. It helps to prevent abuse of power, but it is not foolproof.
Option D is also incorrect because the rule of law governs how laws are enforced, not how policies are created.
Hence, the answers are A, C, and E
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
The rule of law is a fundamental principle that ensures that all individuals and institutions are accountable to the law, and that no one is above the law. It influences people's behaviors and attitudes by providing a framework for acceptable conduct, and by establishing clear consequences for violations of the law. It ensures the separation of powers by limiting the authority of each branch of government, and by requiring that each branch operate within its designated sphere of influence. Finally, it ensures that the law applies to lawmakers by subjecting them to the same standards and consequences as other citizens. However, the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing power, nor does it govern how policies are created.
The ancient city of Alexandria was a major attraction for ______.
scholars
athletes
farmers
soldiers
Answers
Answer:
Scholars
Explanation:
It used to be a library
who is william byrd?
Answers
Answer:
He was an English composer of the renaissance.
Explanation:
Which of these major Texas cities is located the furthest west?
A San Antonio
B Houston
C Dallas
D El Paso
Answers
Answer:
Answe (D) EL Paso
Explanation:
where is the grand canal
Answers
Answer:
The Grand Canal is a vast waterway system in the north-eastern and central-eastern plains of China, running from Beijing in the north to Zhejiang province in the south.
Justifiable for the United State to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?
Answers
Answer:
While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.
When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.
Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:
After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.
What happens when the president makes a treaty with another nation?
The treaty must be approved by 51 percent of the US population.
The treaty must be approved by a two-thirds vote of Congress.
The treaty is sent to government agencies for approval.
The treaty goes into effect once it is signed by the president.
Answers
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
im learning this rn
How did Paraguay change after winning its independence from Portugal and Spain?
Answers
How did the entire American nation mobilize for war? [select all that apply]
Group of answer choices
A Industry made items for the war effort.
B Americans mobilized to produce armaments.
C The government created organizations to help mobilization.
D Women took over jobs that men left.
U can pick all the right answers
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer is A and D.
Name 2 European countries that colonized Latin America and influenced their music.