Answer:
Explanation:
The withdrawal of Roman armies from Britain had several consequences:
Political Fragmentation: The withdrawal of Roman forces left a power vacuum in Britain, leading to political fragmentation and the emergence of various regional kingdoms. This fragmentation contributed to a period of instability and conflicts between different tribes and factions.
Increased Anglo-Saxon Influence: With the departure of Roman authority, the influence of the Anglo-Saxons increased. The Anglo-Saxons, a Germanic people, began migrating to Britain and eventually established their own kingdoms, marking the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon period in British history.
Decline in Urbanization and Infrastructure: The withdrawal of Roman forces led to a decline in urbanization and the deterioration of infrastructure in Britain. Many Roman cities and towns were abandoned or fell into disrepair, and the sophisticated Roman infrastructure, such as roads, aqueducts, and public buildings, was no longer maintained.
Loss of Trade and Economic Decline: The withdrawal of Roman forces disrupted trade routes and led to a decline in economic activity. Britain's connection to the wider Roman Empire was severed, and the region experienced a decline in trade and economic prosperity.
Cultural Shifts: With the departure of the Romans, there was a shift in cultural influences. The Roman presence had a significant impact on the culture, language, and social structures in Britain. After their withdrawal, new cultural elements from the Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic tribes began to shape the region.
Overall, the withdrawal of Roman armies from Britain resulted in political, social, economic, and cultural changes, setting the stage for the subsequent development of Anglo-Saxon England.
After the Roman armies left Britain, there were several consequences. Britain was left vulnerable to attacks by the Picts and Scots who raided and attacked vulnerable cities and towns, prompting the Britons to seek military help from continental Europe.
As a result, Anglo-Saxon invaders began to settle in Britain, and in the process, they gradually established a new culture and language that would eventually become Old English. Another consequence of the withdrawal of Roman armies was the gradual decline of trade in Britain. With the departure of the Romans, the Britons lost their biggest trading partner, making it harder for them to sell goods to the rest of the world. Furthermore, the end of Roman occupation also saw the decline of public services such as public baths, aqueducts, and roads.
The withdrawal of Roman armies had several consequences, including leaving Britain vulnerable to attacks, the establishment of a new culture and language, the gradual decline of trade, and the loss of public services.
To know more about Roman empire visit-
https://brainly.com/question/32649393
#SPJ11
Which of the following accurately compares respective the immigration experiences of Europe and
Japan during and after the 1970s
A. Both had guest worker programs, but Europe allowed far more permanent settiement than did Japan.
B. Both had guest worker programs, but Japan succeeded better in integrating those who settled permanently.
C. Both had guest worker programs, but each prohibited permanent settlement.
D. Both had guest worker programs, which they each transitioned to large-scale permanent settlement.
A. Both had guest worker programs, but Europe allowed far more permanent settlement than did Japan.
Permanent settlement, also known as the Permanent Settlement System or the Zamindari System, refers to a land revenue system that was implemented during the British colonial rule in India. It was introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 as a means to stabilize the land revenue collection in the Bengal Presidency.
Under the Permanent Settlement, landowners, known as zamindars, were given the hereditary rights to collect and retain a fixed amount of revenue from the land they controlled. The revenue assessment was based on the productive capacity of the land, and once the fixed amount was determined, it remained unchanged permanently. This system aimed to provide stability and encourage investment in agriculture by providing landowners with an assured income.
To learn more about permanent settlement
https://brainly.com/question/29401761
#SPJ11
Taccurately compares respective the immigration experiences of Europe and Japan during and after the 1970s Both had guest worker programs, but Europe allowed far more permanent settiement than did Japan (option a)
However, Europe allowed far more permanent settlement than Japan did. This is because Europe had a more lenient immigration policy that allowed immigrants to become permanent residents and citizens. In contrast, Japan's policy towards immigration was more restrictive, with a focus on temporary employment. Despite their similarities in having guest worker programs, Japan succeeded better in integrating those who settled permanently.
This is because Japan's immigration policy focused on assimilation and Japanese language education for immigrants. This helped to facilitate integration and reduce social tensions between Japanese and immigrant communities. Overall, both Europe and Japan had different approaches to immigration during and after the 1970s. While Europe allowed more permanent settlement, Japan focused on assimilation and integration for those who settled permanently. The correct answer is A. Both Europe and Japan had guest worker programs during and after the 1970s.
For more about Europe:
https://brainly.com/question/9739811
#SPJ4
Who did the Qin emperor change in his dynasty?
Choose one item most associated with the first red scare
Palmer Raids are associated with the first Red Scare, involving government-led arrests of suspected radicals in the post-World War I period.
The Palmer Raids were a series of government-led investigations and arrests conducted in the United States during the first Red Scare, which occurred in the aftermath of World War I. The raids were initiated by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer and aimed to identify and arrest individuals suspected of being anarchists, radicals, or members of communist organizations. The raids targeted immigrants, particularly those from Eastern Europe, and resulted in the arrest and deportation of thousands of individuals.
The Palmer Raids were driven by the fear of the spread of communism and radicalism in the United States during this period. The government believed that these individuals posed a threat to national security and social order. The raids were characterized by aggressive tactics, such as illegal searches and arrests without warrants, leading to widespread violations of civil liberties. While some individuals were found to be involved in radical activities, many innocent people were also targeted and subjected to unfair treatment.
Overall, the Palmer Raids serve as a prominent symbol of the intense anti-communist sentiment and the suppression of political dissent that prevailed during the first Red Scare in the United States.
Learn more about Palmer Raids
https://brainly.com/question/8231281
#SPJ11
The church launched how many crusades, or military expeditions, to the Holy land?
4
8
15
30
Answer:
8
Explanation:
which is my favorite number
2. What are the two ways the Industrial Revolution caused the need for Europe to expand and take colonies
Answer:
Answer Below
Explanation:
Industrial revolution led to growth of industries and trade. Industries demanded raw materials which had limited availability in Europe. This led the Europeans to seek out new colonies which had untapped natural resources and therefore cheap raw materials.
Industrialisation resulted in mass production of goods. Goods thus produced needed a market and the Europeans took these goods to their colonies, which provided a ready market.
What do you think John Locke means when he says that “actions speak louder than words?”
Answer:
This proverb means that a person's actions communicate more clearly than his words. If a person wants others to believe his words,
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer down there
Explanation:
I believe he means that out actions can be stronger than any words we use. Don't just say what you think about something, act upon it! Want to try and end world hunger? Don't just say it, DO it. This is what I think it means.
Which of these statements best compares the economic development of the North and South during the first half of the 19th century?
A. More factories and railroad lines were built in the North than in the South.
B. The North developed more trade connections with Europe than the South did.
C. Land values in the North increased more quickly than land values in the South.
D. Exporting agricultural goods became more important to the North than to the South.
Answer: A
Explanation:
More factories and railroad lines were built in the North than in the South: best compares the economic development of the North and South during the first half of the 19th century. Thus, option A is the correct option.
Why were there more railroads in the north than in the South?Lawmakers from the north had a reason to object to proposals for a southern route since the Transcontinental Railroad was planned and building got underway during the Civil War. Republican legislators picked a northern route while southerners resigned their seats in the legislature in order to shield the railroad from the fight and ensure that northern states benefited from the line more than their southern counterparts.
The North's transcontinental aspirations also had a geopolitical purpose, which was to punish the South for its participation in the 1861 secession effort. The railroad was increasingly seen as a resource for the North as the conflict carried on. Despite not being finished until four years after the Civil War, the railroad's potential contribution to the North's military effort cannot be overstated.
Learn more about the economic development of the North here:
https://brainly.com/question/29246320
#SPJ3
What was one of the main advantages of the South?
A. a larger population
B. Excellent military leaders
C. Belief in states rights
D.Strong industries
in the twelfth century, england developed, and came to be governed by, what law?
In the twelfth century, England developed and came to be governed by the common law. This was a legal system based on judicial decisions and customs rather than on written laws or codes.
Common law evolved from the practices of the royal courts of justice and became the law of the land under the reign of King Henry II. Judges in these courts were authorized to make decisions based on previous court rulings and local customs. Common law was adopted by other countries that were part of the British Empire and became an important legal system in many parts of the world.
Common law allowed for more flexibility and discretion in legal rulings, and it also established the idea of judicial review, in which judges were empowered to review and declare laws unconstitutional. This laid the foundation for the development of modern constitutional law. Over time, the common law system in England became more structured and formalized, with the creation of higher courts and the establishment of legal precedents. Today, many countries still use common law as their legal system, including the United States, Canada, and Australia.
Learn more about common laws here:-brainly.com/question/543705
#SPJ11
What was the Stamp Act of 1765? What did the tax mean for the colonies? What did the tax represent to the colonists?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was imposed by the British Parliament after the Seven Years’ War in order to pay for the stationing of their troops during the war. The Act forced colonists to pay a tax on papers, documents etc in the form of a stamp. The tax represented the beginning of a series of unfair taxes to the colonies. It represented a loss of freedom and voice (or representation) in British legislature. Things would get worse though.
So basically, the Stamp Act marked the beginning of a series of imposed taxes (The Stamp Act was the first).
How did the American Revolution impact the rest of the world?
Group of answer choices
a modern democracy
Countries stopped trading with each other
Britain was in a lot of debt People turned to religion again for their answers on life
Other colonies/nations started their own revolution
Answer:
Modern democracy and other colonies started their own revolutions.
Explanation: America was the first democracy in the modern world. This also inspired other revolts. Namely the French revolution just a few year later.
GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
-if you answer correctly ill give you brainliest which will give you 30pts-
Answer: Free elections in Eastern Europe
Explanation: I think its free elections because when Stalin broke that promise it was criticized a lot especially by the US
Answer:
(B) Free elections in Eastern Europe
Explanation:
Well when world war 2 ended, germany was split into 2 halves, 1 for the wester allies and one for the USSR. So jsut imagine Europe beign split in half, all those smaller countries that was behind Germany, it’s now Stalin’s. The western allies wanted Stalin to host free and fair election in those small countries, while Stalin decided to make everyone of those under his rulee, xcept for 2 smaller ones but still, complete power.
what is the term given to a person called a mexican cowboy
Who did Canada side with during the Revolutionary War?
Answer:
neither they were neutral
Explanation:
The American invaders had expected French Canadians to pick up arms against the British and fight alongside them, but they badly misjudged Canadian sentiment. Most ordinary habitants remained determinedly neutral – refusing to take up arms against either their British rulers, or the American rebels.
hope that helps
gandhi is known in the indian independence movements for his practice of ahimsa, or______
Gandhi is known in the Indian independence movement for his practice of ahimsa as "non-violence".
Ahimsa was a core principle and philosophy that guided Gandhi's approach to social and political change.For Gandhi, ahimsa meant not only refraining from physical violence but also avoiding harm in thoughts, words, and actions. He believed that true strength and courage lie in the ability to resolve conflicts peacefully and without causing harm to others. Through ahimsa, Gandhi aimed to promote harmony, understanding, and justice.Gandhi's practice of ahimsa was deeply rooted in his spiritual and ethical beliefs. He viewed non-violence as a powerful force for social transformation, capable of breaking cycles of violence and oppression. By embracing ahimsa, Gandhi inspired millions of people to engage in peaceful resistance, civil disobedience, and non-cooperation as means to challenge colonial rule and fight for India's independence. Gandhi's practice of ahimsa in the Indian independence movement signifies his commitment to non-violence and the pursuit of justice through peaceful means.Gandhi is known in the Indian independence movement for his practice of ahimsa, which is a Sanskrit term that can be translated as "non-violence" or "non-harming".
For more such questions on Indian independence movement
https://brainly.com/question/12153093
#SPJ8
The Jesuits, Ursulines, Sulpicians, Secular daughters of the Congrégation de Notre-Dame de Montréal all offered the same services to the population. How can you link this service to one of the goals of the colony of New France?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can answer the following.
I can link this service of the Jesuits, Ursulines, Sulpicians, and Secular daughters of the Congrégation de Notre-Dame de Montréalto to one of the goals of the colony of New France. This goal was that French colonists wanted to evangelize the Native American Indians of North America in the Catholic religion. That is why they established missions in New France.
Two other important goals that French people had in the North American region were to transport French people from France to the colony of New France because there were already many people living in the European county. The other goal was to earn big money in the fur trade. This goal was very important, French people wanted to be rich with the fur trade.
if you answer this correctly i will give you the brainlist answer pls help !!
Answer:pretty sure it's d
Explanation:a is unreasonable because they're too old, b isn't it because they're too old, and c i don't think it's EXACTLY like the one described. good luck!
Which of the following terms is used to refer to someone who had their
passage to the New World paid for by a sponsor and worked for four to five
years for their sponsor before being granted freedom. *
o Slave
O Indentured Servant
O Croatoan
O Joint-Stock Investors
Answer:
Indentured Servants
Explanation:
because slaves were forced to work for the owner and indentured servants were people who wanted to start a new life but couldn't get there. So they make a deal with a property owner or farmer to pay for them to get to the new World. In return they must work for them for 7 years
the mayflower compact created what kind of government for the plymouth colony?
The Mayflower Compact created a form of self-government known as a "civil body politic" for the Plymouth Colony.
The Mayflower Compact was a document signed by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower ship in 1620 before their arrival in Plymouth, Massachusetts. It served as a social contract and established guidelines for governance and cooperation among the settlers. The compact declared that the signatories agreed to form a government and make laws for the general good of the colony.
It also emphasized the importance of majority rule and consent of the governed. While not a constitution in the modern sense, the Mayflower Compact laid the foundation for democratic principles and self-government in the early years of the Plymouth Colony.
To learn more about colony click here:
brainly.com/question/32433306
#SPJ11
What does democracy mean to you
Answer: democracy is a type of government by the whole population or of alll of the people in the state.
Explanation:
I learned it in social studies in middle school I just remembered the meaning of it.
ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLTIST IF RIGHT
Answer:
It forced non-Muslim subjects to pay entire taxes
Explanation:
Since their were some people that were non-Muslims, they had to pay more taxes until they converted into the Islamic religion in which you didn't have to pay as much taxes.
What was the focus of the earliest phase of the women’s movement, led by stanton and anthony? reproductive rights workplace discrimination voting rights equal pay
The early phase of the Women's Movement, led by Stanton and Anthony, was focused on achieving political and civic rights for women, particularly the ability to vote.
What was the primary focus of the women's movement in its early stages?The feminist movement that evolved in England, the United States, and other parts of the world throughout the nineteenth (19th) and early twentieth (20th) centuries is referred to as the first wave of feminism.
Initially, it centered on achieving equality with males in terms of property rights, equal capacity and power to act, and the desire for equal rights within marriage. At the end of the nineteenth century, emphasis was placed on attaining political rights, notably the right to vote.
Therefore, option (c), voting rights is the correct answer.
For more information about the women’s movement, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/276910
In American history, the Connecticut Compromise is also known as __________.
A.
the Magna Carta
B.
the Great Compromise
C.
the Declaration of Independence
D.
the Constitution of the United States
Answer:
The great compromise
Explanation:
Because it was the biggest
Use union in a Sentence (history related) please help will give brainliest
Answer:
As General Sherman advanced, the Union troops marched through Georgia to the sea, burning everything in their wake.
Explanation:
Sherman's March to the Sea was a military offensive by the Union forces in the American Civil War.
Is an absolutist government always totalitarian?
Yes
No
Answer:
yes it is friend and good luck
Answer:
I'll prefer both
yes, as some time it can lead to very strict rules and we can't speak for ourselves ,we are govern by a ruler or the representative of the country and if we wish also to change the representative we can't as what so ever he wish the things will happen to the country and if he doesn't help to his country and people can't fight because of his rules and regulations it would lead to total tolerance
and no, because it can't be tolerance if the king is kind towards his nation and people and solves the problem faced by his country and the country is developing because of him it wouldn't lead for tolerance as the people are happy with that ruler or the representative of there country.
(hope it'll help you)
What date was it when Lincoln defeated McClellan for president?
Please help as soon as possible!!
{Answers that have nothing to do with the question (meaning just answered wrong for the sake of points) will be reported}
Answer: November 8, 1864
Explanation:
“War is In no way a relationship of man with man but a relationship between States, in which individuals are enemies only by accident; not as men, nor even as citizens, but as soldiers . . . since the object of war is to destroy the enemy State, it is legitimate to kill the latter’s defenders as long as they carry arms; but as soon as they lay them down and surrender, they cease to be enemies or agents of the enemy, and they again become mere men and it is not longer legitimate to take their lives" - Jean Jacques Rousseau
Do you think this is still applicable today? Who are the “defenders” he mentions?
Jean Jacques Rousseau idea is still applicable today. Defenders, as mentioned by Rousseau, are the soldiers who are fighting to protect their state.
According to Jean Jacques Rousseau, war is not a man-to-man relationship, rather it's a relationship between states where individuals are only enemies by accident.
They are not enemies as men or citizens, but as soldiers.
Since the objective of the war is to destroy the enemy state, it is legitimate to kill the latter's defenders as long as they carry arms.
But as soon as they lay down their arms and surrender, they cease to be enemies, and they again become mere men, and it's no longer legitimate to take their lives.
According to me, this is still applicable today.
Defenders, as mentioned by Rousseau, are the soldiers who are fighting to protect their state.
They are authorized to carry arms and engage in warfare by the state or country they are defending.
They may belong to the army, air force, navy, or any other military or paramilitary force.
These defenders may include both men and women who have been trained to defend their country against any external threat.
In conclusion, Rousseau's idea is still applicable today.
The defenders who carry arms and fight for their country are legitimate targets in war.
However, as soon as they surrender and lay down their arms, they cease to be enemies, and it's no longer legitimate to take their lives.
For more questions on Jean Jacques Rousseau
https://brainly.com/question/30806188
#SPJ8
Question 24
What was the immediate result of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941?
The United States dropped two nuclear bombs on Japanese Cities
The United States passed several laws to ensure the US would remain neutral
The United States began preparing for the "D-day invasion of the Island of Japa
The United States declared war on Japan and entered WWII
The United States began preparing for the "D-day invasion of the Island of Japa
Martin Luther King Jr. delivered a stirring speech on August 28, 1963, during a civil rights march in Washington, D.C. The electrifying speech became known as "I Have a Dream" and was carried live by TV stations around the nation.
According to your reading in Topic 2, how did televised events like King’s speech impact the civil rights movement of the 1960s?
Press coverage on television was used as a way to present both sides of the issue, and television became a platform for education.
What was seen on television, including violence toward protestors, supplanted what was written in newspapers or heard on radio and shifted opinions in favor of an egalitarian society.
The national programming affiliations of local television stations allowed people to see and learn about parts of the country they had never been to before.
Television allowed for companies that supported the civil rights movement to advertise across the nation and gave them more exposure and power.
PLEASE HELP Think about the first eight lines and the tone of the rest of the poem. Based on the poem, how do you think William Blake felt about child labor in London during the Industrial Revolution? Use at least three pieces of evidence from the poem to support your response. Your answer should be three to four sentences long.
Answer:
Blacke felt uncomfortable and sad about child labor.
Explanation:
The poem shows a sad situation for children who are exploited because of work. The poet shows a melancholy reality that tries to make the reader understand that the work these children are subjected to is something very uncomfortable and extremely sad.
On the lines "¨Could scarcely cry ¨Weep! Weep! Weep! Weep! ¨ So your chimneys I sweep, and in soot I sleep." the author shows how unhappy these children were and shows all their discontent with this reality.
In the lines "That thousands of sweepers, D, Joe, Ned, and Jack, Were all of them locked up in coffins of black," he shows how these children were doomed to die and missed a lifetime of opportunity.