Answers
An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino
Who is Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino?Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.
An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.
In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.
Read more about organized crime
brainly.com/question/8451608
Related Questions
any law interfering in life liberty and property is called what
Answers
Answer:
due process
Explanation:
Most illegal immigrants come from which country?
Answers
Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.
Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.
Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.
Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.
Learn more about immigrants here:
https://brainly.com/question/28791683
#SPJ6
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Answers
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
The police arrested David while he was returning home on Thursday evening hip your truly bewildered following their arrest him in another charges they were filed against him which amendment of the Bill of Rights gives david
the right to learn more about the charges level to consume
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The Sixth Amendment States "Guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you."
Assess how employment laws contribute to termination of
contracts.
Question:
List the Laws relating to employment, in particular
with regard to Employment Relations Act 2004 and what these
legislatio
Answers
Employment contracts outline both employers' and employees' rights and responsibilities. They outline the conditions of employment, including the start and end dates as well as the hours worked, pay, and perks.
Termination by Mutual Agreement: In some circumstances, the employer and employee may decide to end a contract mutually. Negotiations, severance payments, or settlement agreements may be necessary.
At-Will Employment: There is a concept of "at-will" employment in nations like the United States, where either the employer or employee may terminate the work relationship at any time, with or without cause, provided that it does not contravene any other laws (for example, anti-discrimination laws).
Notice Requirements: A number of employment laws stipulate that both parties must provide notice before ending an employment agreement. Observation period.
Learn more about Employment Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/24191862
#SPJ11
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
Which of the following activities in the United States would most likely be paid for by a state government instead of a national government?
A. enforcement of traffic laws
B. inspection of agricultural products
C. maintenance of interstate highways
D. production of spy satellites
Answers
A state government rather than the federal government would most likely pay for the United States to check agricultural products.
What is federal government?The U.S. Constitution gives Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, in that order, control over the three separate branches that make up the Federal Government: legislative, executive, and judicial.Citizens are governed by federal and state governments separately. All fifty states are subject to some degree of federal control. State governments have the authority to enact laws inside their own borders.Among other things, these enumerated powers include the ability to levy taxes, control commerce, establish a uniform naturalization law, create federal courts (subordinate to the Supreme Court), create and maintain a military, and declare war. The Federal Government is now stronger thanks to the Constitution. The federal government and the state governments were given authority.Therefore, the correct option is b) inspection of agricultural products.
To learn more about federal government, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
The enforcement of traffic laws is typically a responsibility paid for by state governments in the United States rather than the national government.
Explanation:The activity among the options given that would most likely be paid for by a state government instead of the national government in the United States is the enforcement of traffic laws. Generally, the task of enforcing traffic laws falls under the jurisdiction of local and state governments. This involves tasks like managing traffic and enforcing speed limits. National functions, on the other hand, often involve larger-scale projects or regulations that impact the entire country, such as the production of spy satellites, maintenance of interstate highways, and inspection of agricultural products.
Learn more about State Government Responsibilities here:https://brainly.com/question/34234212
#SPJ2
what type of damages are designed to place a plaintiff in the same position as if there had been no breach of the contract? question 18 options: punitive damages specific damages compensatory damages monetary damages exact damages
Answers
Option compensatory damages is the correct option.
Compensatory settlements. damages that are intended to put a plaintiff in the same situation as if there had been no contract violation
Actual damages, commonly referred to as compensatory damages in tort law, are financial awards made by a judge that are equal to the loss a party experienced. A court may alternatively award minimal damages if a party's right was formally infringed but they did not experience any hurt or losses.
Actual monetary losses are covered by compensatory damages. For instance, a victim of negligence may file a lawsuit against the offender to recover lost earnings and medical expenses.
Money that is granted to an affected person as compensation for losses, injuries, or other losses is known as compensatory damages. In civil court situations when loss has happened as a result of another party's carelessness or illegal behaviour, compensatory damages are granted.
For such more question on compensatory damages
https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ4
Which of the following is NOT a right that the state has in privately owned property?
Answers
Answer:
Although unpaid taxes result in a lien (which is an encumbrance), an encumbrance is not a state right in and of itself in private property.
Explanation:
IF IT HELPED UH PLEASE MARK ME A BRAINLIEST :))I just entered my card information on your site but I am getting continuous pop ups etc asking for more payment.
Answers
The pop-up advertisements that claim you've won are frequently only a cover for viruses and con artists.
What are advertisements?Advertising sometimes referred to as an advert or ad, is typically seen as a form of public discourse that supports a good, service, organization, or event. Some others consider the concept to be far broader than that, including any sort of sponsored advertisement intended to inform or influence
On occasion, pop-up advertisements congratulating you on winning a reward may have interrupted your smartphone browsing on other websites. Navigate to Settings while in Safe mode, then swipe to and tap Apps. From here, you can uninstall the most recent app(s) that have been installed or updated and may be the source of the pop-up ads.
Therefore, advertisements that claim you've won are frequently
Learn more about advertisements here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
People and Families is the systems theory used to understand people, their families, and their dynamics.true or false
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This theory allows one to understand the organizational complexity of families, as well as the interactive patterns that guide family interactions. In order to understand a family system, we must look at the family as a whole and observe how they interact with each other to maintain homeostasis.
the most common form of consequence-oriented reasoning is known as
Answers
Answer:
the fathers of utilitarianism.
Explanation:
utilitarianism the most common form of consequence oriented reasoning, in which the good resides in the promotion of happiness or the greatest net increase of pleasure over pain.
Answer:
Utilitarianism
Explanation:
what progress was made during the progressive era regarding anti-lynching laws?
Answers
Anti-lynching activism gained momentum during this period, as individuals and organizations worked to raise awareness about the brutal and racially motivated acts of lynching that were prevalent in the United States. Lynching, which involved extrajudicial killings, often targeting African Americans, was used as a tool of racial terror and intimidation.
Though federal anti-lynching legislation faced significant obstacles and challenges, there were notable efforts made to combat lynching at the state and local levels. Various organizations, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Anti-Lynching Crusaders, and the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching, played crucial roles in advocating for anti-lynching laws.
One of the significant achievements during the Progressive Era was the increasing awareness and public outcry against lynching. Activists worked tirelessly to expose the horrors of lynching through public campaigns, journalism, and the mobilization of public sentiment. This increased awareness led to a broader understanding of the urgency to address lynching as a grave human rights issue.
Additionally, several states took steps to pass anti-lynching legislation. For example, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina enacted anti-lynching laws during this period, although the effectiveness and enforcement of these laws varied. While some laws aimed to hold individuals accountable for participating in or facilitating lynchings, others focused on addressing the failure to protect victims or preventing mob violence.
However, it is important to note that federal anti-lynching legislation faced significant challenges. Despite multiple attempts to pass federal anti-lynching bills, they were often met with resistance from lawmakers, particularly those from Southern states. Political obstacles, filibustering, and racial tensions impeded the passage of comprehensive federal legislation during the Progressive Era.
Nonetheless, the efforts made during this time laid the foundation for continued advocacy and eventually led to significant progress in the mid-20th century. It wasn't until 2020, with the passage of the Emmett Till Antilynching Act, that the U.S. Congress finally passed federal legislation explicitly criminalizing lynching.
Overall, the Progressive Era saw significant progress in raising awareness, advocating for anti-lynching laws at the state level, and establishing a framework for future activism. While federal anti-lynching legislation faced challenges, the groundwork laid during this period played a crucial role in advancing the fight against racial violence and promoting equality and justice.
"Discuss the principle of mens rea and its relevance in today's criminal law"
Answers
Answer:
as we all know the criminal activities are increasing day by day .
which case would the federal courts be permitted to wear under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction?
Answers
Federal courts would be permitted to hear cases under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction if the following conditions are met:
The parties in the case are citizens of different states.The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold, which is currently set at $75,000 (as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021).Under diversity jurisdiction, the federal courts have the authority to hear civil cases between citizens of different states, even if the issues involved are based on state law. This allows for a neutral federal forum to resolve disputes between parties from different states, providing an alternative to state courts.
It's important to note that diversity jurisdiction only applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Additionally, there are certain exceptions and additional requirements that may apply in specific situations. Consulting with an attorney or referring to current legal statutes and precedents would provide the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding diversity jurisdiction.
To know more about Federal courts
brainly.com/question/31037815
#SPJ11
I need help with this two question urgently, please help me and I will appreciate it but please don't copy and paste off the internet! Thank you so much in advanced, by the way this is a Criminology class.
Answers
A theory stands as a soundly based explanation of some aspect of the real world that is backed by empirical data and has been looked into repeatedly, with both observation and experimentation used to validate it. It establishes a system of understanding which explains how and why things function, providing insight into the latent rules that regulate in phenomena.
How to explain the theoryThe typical elements involved in a theory might comprise of:
Hypotheses: Generally, theories are initiated with one or more hypotheses that serve as provisional elucidations for observed events. These hypotheses are drawn from examining, earlier knowledge synthesis, as well as intuition.
Predictions: Theories make forecasts regarding what should happen under particular predicaments. These predictions can be evaluated through testing via observation and experimentation.
Principles: On this foundation are formed principles or axioms offering comprehension on the concealed fundamentals governing a phenomenon. These tenets can be then exploited to determine hypothesis and predictions.
Observations: The theoretic tenet is constructed upon groundwork laid by observing the reality that provides proof either affirming or disputing their corresponding predictions and hypotheses.
Experiments: A theory is subject to trials using manipulation of factors inside a controlled environment so as to brook contemplation of the results instigated. Such testing advances proofs accepted or dismissed the specified hypothesis and estimates.
Explanation: In the same manner a theory offers clarity towards discerned phenomenon, showing up the workings regulating them. This interpretation can point future investigation and decision making.
Learn more about theory on
https://brainly.com/question/11555274
#SPJ1
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
Answers
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
jurisdiction of local police agencies is limited to the geographical boundaries of the__________
Answers
The jurisdiction of local police agencies is limited to the geographical boundaries of the locality they operate in.
Jurisdiction refers to the area within which a police department is allowed to operate and enforce laws. The jurisdiction of local police agencies is limited to the geographical boundaries of the locality they operate in. These boundaries can be based on the city, county, or state that the department operates within.Law enforcement agencies are divided into several levels, such as local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. Local police agencies usually have jurisdiction within the boundaries of their locality, such as a city or town, whereas state and federal law enforcement agencies have broader jurisdiction that can cover multiple localities or even the entire country.In summary, the geographical boundaries of the locality determine the jurisdiction of local police agencies. These agencies have the power to enforce laws only within the boundaries of the locality they operate in.
To know more about Jurisdiction visit:
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
As an early childhood education caregiver, what would be a challenge of working with a helicopter parent
Answers
Answer:
As a caregiver you can't always do that because you are busy with other children but you can tell the parent that you can give them a review at the end of the day when they will pick up their child.
hope this helps!
drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. match the following types of imperial government to their characteristics. region where colonizers come to live region receiving military support from an imperial country part of a country controlled by an imperial country sphere of influence arrowright protectorate arrowright colony arrowright
Answers
The answer to the statement "drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. match the following types of imperial government to their characteristics."
Region where colonizers come to live : Colony
Part of a country controlled by an imperial country : sphere of influence
Region receiving military support from an imperial country : protectorate
In international politics, sphere of influence refers to a state's assertion of exclusive or predominate authority over a foreign region or territory.
In terms of international relations, colonialism describes the relationship between two states in which one of them exerts some degree of decisive control over the other.
In International relations, a protectorate is a partnership between two governments in which one of them exerts significant influence over the other.
To know more about government
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
After 26-year-old Kayden failed a sobriety test when he was pulled over, he was arrested for driving under the influence. He has never been in trouble before and admits that he had too much to drink before getting behind the wheel. Thankfully, Kayden was pulled over before anyone was hurt. The magistrate decides that Kayden does need to face the charge against him. Given his history and the crime, where will the magistrate MOST likely send Kayden?
Answers
The magistrate will most likely to set bail for Kayden at $40,000.
What happens when a person fails a sobriety test?A Lot of those tests are tough to perform sober, and lots of factors apart from the influence can motivate a character to fail the take a look at. Thus, a failed subject sobriety check does not, with the aid of using any means, continually cause a conviction for driving under influence.
Thus, The magistrate will most likely to set bail for Kayden at $40,000.
learn more about the sobriety test here:
https://brainly.com/question/13840815
#SPJ1
Answer:
he will release Kayden on his own recognizance.
At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
The answer is True!
Explanation:
Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.
Answer:
True
"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."
WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST!
What Enlightenment ideal does this quote show? "That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government .
Declaration of Independence 1776
A.stare decusis
B. federalism
C. separation of powers
D. socal contract
Answers
Answer:
Its D. social contract
Explanation:
Just did the quiz and C was incorrect
In what way is DNA fingerprinting and traditional fingerprinting different? Which statement is not true?
Answers
Both are equally dependable and easy to do at any crime lab: DNA fingerprinting and traditional fingerprinting different. Thus, option B is the correct option.
In comparison to many other types of crime scene evidence, DNA evidence is seen to be more trustworthy. For this reason, law enforcement agents regularly take tissue samples from people who are involved in a crime—even tangentially.
Each person has a distinct DNA fingerprint, similar to the fingerprints that detectives and police labs started using in the 1930s. A DNA fingerprint is the same for every cell, tissue, and organ of a person, unlike a traditional fingerprint, which only appears on the fingertips and may be changed by surgery.
Learn more about DNA here:
https://brainly.com/question/30993611
#SPJ1
Probably the full options are:
A. Both types of fingerprints can often be easy to obtain from the crime scene.
B. Both are equally dependable and easy to do at any crime lab.
C. Both use traits that are unique to a given individual.
D. Both find a match using a computer to search a digital database.
Answer:
Answer B is correct.
Explanation:
I just know.
the final question of the blanchard-peale "three part test", has to do with conscience. true false
Answers
The given statement "the final question of the blanchard-peale "three part test", has to do with conscience" is False because the final question of the Blanchard-Peale "Three-Part Test" does not specifically pertain to conscience. The three questions of the test, developed by Dr. Kenneth Blanchard and Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, are as follows:
Is it legal?
Is it balanced?
How does it make you feel?
These questions are meant to guide individuals in assessing the ethical implications of a decision or action they are considering. The third question, "How does it make you feel?", focuses on evaluating the impact of the decision on one's personal values, sense of integrity, and emotional well-being. It encourages individuals to consider whether the decision aligns with their personal beliefs and values.
To know more about conscience refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31245942
#SPJ11
Which of the following nations comes closest to having a political system that is "totalitarian"? a. Mexico b. France c. North Korea d. Japan.
Answers
Answer:
France comes closest to having a political system
The nation that comes closest to having a political system that is "totalitarian" among the options provided is c. North Korea.
North Korea is known for its authoritarian regime with tight control over all aspects of public and private life, including political, economic, and social spheres. The government exercises extensive surveillance, censorship, and repression, limiting individual freedoms and maintaining strict ideological control.
North Korea is widely recognized as an authoritarian regime characterized by a totalitarian political system. The government in North Korea, led by the ruling Korean Workers' Party and the Kim family dynasty, exerts comprehensive control over virtually all aspects of public and private life within the country.
In North Korea, the government maintains strict political control through a centralized power structure. The ruling party dominates all branches of government, including the executive, legislative, and judicial bodies. The party's ideology, known as Juche, forms the foundation of the state's policies and serves as a means to maintain the regime's power.
To know more about totalitarian,
https://brainly.com/question/30701605
#SPJ11
The
purpose of the UCC is to make the law
states,
among the various
A. uniform
B. understandable
C. strict
D. different
Answers
Answer:
do the challenge in brainly it gives u points !!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
uniform
Explanation:
just did it
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
Answers
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
2. A, being a business minded person
decided to put a business (KTV Bar)
beside San Sebastian College, Manila.
As part of
of its promotion, live
entertainment is being offered. Most of
its patrons are students. The operation of
the business starts from 1pm and ends
at 4am. Can the municipal mayor order
the foreclosure
of
business
Answers
Yes, the municipal mayor can order the foreclosure of A's business if it is found to be violating any laws or ordinances.
Why can the municipal mayor order the foreclosure ?In the present scenario, the commercial entity is sited in close proximity to an educational institution and facilitates live amusement services. This has the potential to cause disturbance to the students and the vicinal populace.
Moreover, the enterprise conducts its operations from 1:00 PM until 4:00 AM, thus deviating from standard business hours. This phenomenon has the potential to result in the emission of sound waves perceived as excessive by individuals, commonly referred to as noise pollution, as well as other disruptions.
The municipal mayor possesses the authority to implement and uphold legal regulations while safeguarding the welfare of the general public. In the event that a violation of laws or ordinances by A's business is discovered, the individual in question possesses the power to mandate the closure of said business.
Find out more on foreclosure at https://brainly.com/question/13055547
#SPJ1
keynesian school economics such as its founder john maynard keynes would argue that to stimulate the economy, governments and/or the central bank should pursue the following kind of policy?