What might be unfair to an innocent person in the current arrest process? Explain and include specific details about the actual rules of arrest.



How can these issues be avoided or reduced?



What can innocent people do to avoid any risk of use of force from police officers in the making of an arrest?



Do you feel that a wrongly convicted, innocent person should be given compensation by the government? Why or why not?



I just need help with a very helpful website

Answer:

The United States Constitution places no time limit on the terms of Supreme Court justices mainly because the framers of the Constitution believed in the importance of an independent judiciary that is not subject to political pressures or undue influence. They wanted Supreme Court justices to be able to make decisions based purely on the merits of each case, without worrying about the potential impact on their chances for reappointment or reelection. Therefore, the Constitution grants lifetime tenure to Supreme Court justices, subject to good behavior, in order to ensure their independence and impartiality.

The United States Constitution places no time limit on the terms of Supreme Court Justices mainly because: the framers wanted to ensure that Justices should be free from political or economic pressures.

By granting lifetime appointments, Justices can make decisions based on the law and the Constitution rather than worrying about re-election or pleasing a particular political party.

This independence helps maintain the balance of power between the three branches of government and preserves the integrity of the judicial system.

In short, lifetime appointments for Supreme Court Justices were designed to promote impartiality and protect the judiciary from external influences.

Answer:

C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money

italian government tried marian true

Marion True, a former antiquities curator at the J.P. Getty Museum of Los Angeles, was put on trial by the Italian government on charges including dealing in stolen antiques .

Even collaborating with thieves to transport goods out of Italy. Following a protracted court fight and the imminent return of a few of the items to Italy, True was convicted of purchasing hundreds of plundered artefacts for the collection of the Getty Museum.

The case brought to light the persistent problem of the illegal trade in cultural assets and the requirement for stronger international collaboration in its eradication.

To know more about Getty Museum visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11476417

#SPJ1

Complete question: The italian government tried Marian true, the former curator of antiquities of the j.p. getty museum in los angeles, on charges of _____.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The conflict between Great Britain and Ireland in the 19th century often centered on issues related to Irish nationalism, political autonomy, religious tensions, land rights, and economic disparities.

Here are some key aspects that were central to the conflict during that time:

1. Irish Nationalism: The 19th century witnessed a surge in Irish nationalism, with a growing desire among the Irish population for self-governance and independence from British rule. Irish nationalists sought to revive Irish culture, language, and political institutions as a way to assert their national identity.

2. Political Autonomy: The demand for political autonomy was a significant point of contention between Great Britain and Ireland. Irish nationalists, led by figures such as Daniel O'Connell and later Charles Stewart Parnell, campaigned for greater self-governance and the restoration of an Irish Parliament.

3. Religious Tensions: Religious differences played a role in the conflict, particularly the divide between Ireland's predominantly Catholic population and the Protestant Ascendancy, who held power and privilege in Irish society. Catholics faced discrimination and restrictions on their rights and were often marginalized in politics, landownership, and employment.

4. Land Issues: Land was a major source of conflict between British landlords and Irish tenant farmers. Many Irish farmers faced high rents, exploitative lease agreements, and insecure land tenure. The Land Question became a focal point of Irish grievances, with movements such as the Land League advocating for land reform and fairer treatment of tenants.

5. Economic Disparities: Ireland experienced economic challenges during the 19th century, exacerbated by factors such as the Great Famine (1845-1852) and the effects of British economic policies. Many Irish people suffered from poverty, unemployment, and the loss of their homes and livelihoods.

These issues created a volatile environment in which tensions between Great Britain and Ireland were often high. The conflict eventually led to increased political mobilization, calls for Irish independence, and various movements and events that would shape the path towards the Irish Free State in the early 20th century.

learn more about economic here:brainly.com/question/14355320

#SPJ11

The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.

This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.

Learn more about comparative negligence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29829593

#SPJ11

Since your friend used a fake credit card number and address, it is unlikely that any charges will be made to the card. The text messages he received are most likely part of the scam to trick people into giving their real credit card information or personal details.

However, it is possible that scammers could use the phone number your friend provided to try and obtain more information from him or attempt to scam him in other ways. It is important for your friend to be cautious and not engage with any suspicious messages or phone calls.

Additionally, it is important to educate your friend on the dangers of entering personal information on scam websites and the importance of protecting his personal and financial information. He should also inform his parents or a trusted adult about the situation so they can help monitor his credit and ensure that his personal information is not compromised.

To know more about scam here

https://brainly.com/question/2930131

#SPJ4

Right to privacy

Explanation by posting private information about someone on social media you are invading someone's personal life. It is there right to decide if they want to share there information or not

The act that is being violated when you post the private information of someone on social media is typically referred to as Privacy Act or Privacy Laws.

Privacy laws are designed to protect individuals' right to privacy and prevent the unauthorized disclosure of their personal information without their consent.

By posting someone's private information on social media without their permission, you are violating their right to privacy and potentially infringing upon applicable privacy laws and regulations. It is important to respect and uphold the privacy of individuals by refraining from sharing their private information without proper authorization.

To learn more about the privacy act:

brainly.com/question/31822745

Answer:

Answer:

Here's a sample answer:)

No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the  legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.

A sample of a suspect's DNA can be compared to biological evidence discovered at a crime scene if the suspect is known. Technology can provide a more efficient way to investigate.

The results of the comparison may then be used to determine whether the suspect committed the crime or was present at the crime scene. A chemical test called DNA fingerprinting can reveal a person's or another living thing's genetic make-up. It is used as testimony in court, to identify corpses, find blood relatives, and search for medical treatments. In a criminal investigation, a forensic scientist's duties and responsibilities are vital because they entail carefully reviewing an item of evidence while making sure it hasn't been tampered with. The investigation of a criminal act involves a varied group of forensic scientists and forensic equipment.

Learn more about testimony here:

https://brainly.com/question/26651069

#SPJ4

An executive order differs from a federal law in several ways. An executive order is issued by the President of the United States and is meant to direct and guide the actions of the executive branch of the government. Executive orders are not laws and do not require the approval of Congress.

The president may use an executive order to implement policy changes, to provide guidance to federal agencies, or to take action on a particular issue.Executive orders are more like directives, which aim to set policy or direct action, while laws are formal, written rules that have been passed by Congress and signed by the president. Laws are more powerful than executive orders because they have the force of law behind them. They are also subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they are found to be unconstitutional.Executive orders are also temporary. Once a president leaves office, his or her executive orders are no longer in effect, unless they have been codified into law by Congress.

Federal laws, on the other hand, are permanent, and they can only be changed or repealed by Congress.Executive orders can be challenged in court, but the process is different from the process used to challenge a federal law. While a federal law can be challenged in any court, an executive order can only be challenged in the court that has jurisdiction over the issue in question. Overall, the main differences between an executive order and a federal law are their source of authority, their permanence, and their enforceability.

To know more about executive visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11422252

#SPJ11

Answer:

Law of General Application means that the law must be applied equally, and must not be arbitrary or aimed at specific individuals.

Explanation:

State sovereignty is both essential to the functioning of the United Nations and a significant hinderance for its potential efficacy.

It acts as the foundation for UN values and principles, as it affords members the right to self-determination, independence, freedom, and the right to promote their own interests. However, the very notion of state sovereignty restricts the UN from acting and responding to global challenges in a unified and decisive manner.

As sovereignty is limited only to the state, it makes it difficult for the UN to exercise collective will, as members may not be willing to make collective decisions in the face of intervention and sovereignty infringements. This lack of cohesion creates a paradox between the nations and the UN, as state sovereignty is the prerequisite for the UN to exist, yet serves as a major barrier to its effectiveness.

To know more about State sovereignty , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28386639

#SPJ4

The factor that is NOT one of the four factors used by arbitrators when deciding cases is "c.

The wording of the labor agreement: Arbitrators carefully examine the language and terms of the labor agreement that is in dispute. They analyze the specific clauses, provisions, and terms mentioned in the agreement.

Testimony and evidence offered during the hearing: Arbitrators review the testimonies and evidence presented by both parties during the arbitration hearing. This may include witness statements, documents, and other relevant evidence.

Past practice and precedents: Arbitrators consider past practices and precedents established in similar cases or within the industry. They look for consistency and previous decisions that may have bearing on the current case.

Relevant laws and regulations: Arbitrators take into account applicable laws and regulations that govern the particular labor agreement or dispute. This ensures that the decision aligns with legal requirements.

However, "c. How manag" is not a recognized factor used by arbitrators when deciding cases. It seems that the question may have been cut off, but based on the provided options, "c. How manag" does not align with the typical factors considered by arbitrators.

To know more about arbitrators, visit:

brainly.com/question/33985273

#SPJ11

Answer:

which language is this?

Answer:

Criminal justice is important because it's a system that includes law enforcement, courts, prisons, counseling services, and a number of other organizations and agencies that people come into contact with on a daily basis

Answer:

Measuring Volume answer keyMeasuring Volume answer keyMeasuring Volume answer keyMeasuring Volume answer key

Explanation:

The court should not admit the evidence that the defendant had fully insured the house and its contents. The reason behind this is that it is irrelevant and inadmissible, even though it might show a motive for the arson.

Here are the details of why it is so:

The admission of evidence in a trial is dependent on the Federal Rules of Evidence, which only allows proof that is relevant to the case to be admitted. Evidence is deemed irrelevant if it fails to demonstrate or disprove any element of the charged crime or if it lacks probative value, which means that it does not have the potential to assist the trier of fact in deciding the case. In the above case, the fact that the defendant had insured the house and its contents had no relevance in the proof of whether she had committed arson.

Although it might show a motive for the arson, it is not sufficient enough to be admitted as evidence since insurance coverage is a common practice by homeowners. Therefore, the court should not admit this evidence.

To know more about demonstrate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29360620

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

36. D

37. C

38. B

Hello. The full question is:

A tombstone ad:_________

a. is permitted in Regulation D offerings.

b. is an offer to sell securities.

c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.

d. all of the above

Answer:

c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.

Explanation:

Tombstone is a type of advertisement that presents a list of organizations that are involved in a new specific offer, promoting a wide range of options to the consumer. In addition, this type of advertisement is very efficient in showing important information about the offer, even before the effective date of registration.

The statement, "The court never considers the adequacy of consideration", is False.

Adequacy of consideration refers to the fairness or value of what each party gives in exchange for the other party's promise. In general, the court will not intervene in a contract dispute solely based on the adequacy of consideration as long as both parties have freely and voluntarily agreed to the terms of the contract.

However, in cases with evidence of fraud, duress, undue influence, or mistake, the court may consider the adequacy of consideration as part of its analysis. Additionally, in certain contracts, such as contracts involving the sale of land, the court may require a higher standard of consideration to ensure fairness. In summary, while the court generally does not focus on the adequacy of consideration, there are situations where it may be taken into account.

To learn more about the adequacy of consideration, visit: https://brainly.com/question/17084026

#SPJ11

Answer:

she po in my mouth like she gunna

The logs of inquiries of criminal history must be kept for a minimum of one year.

The term Criminal record refers to the list of the actions and crime activities of the criminal kept properly and being interacted at the time of the criminal justice. It is also known as Criminal record.

This includes the activities of the  Arrests, detentions, convictions, and other interactions with the legal system and law enforcement authorities

Here criminal activity includes the term crime which means any action or inaction that is prohibited by the law. The violation of a legal obligation may also be the focus of a criminal investigation.

All III requests must be recorded together with the identity of the requestor, the agency, the terminal operator, and the reason why the criminal history was required. These records must be retained for at least a year.

Therefore, it can be concluded that logs of inquiries of criminal history must be kept for a minimum of one year.

Learn more about Criminal here:

https://brainly.com/question/4543636

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Because "boro" is known for having low coefficients of thermal expansion.

It may not be title evident who the rightful owner of a residence is due to unpaid debts, divorce, property line disputes potential, or even a simple typing error in the property records solve.

Before a seller may hand over ownership of their house to a buyer, these problems must be rectified. A title defect is an error or omission that affects the ownership rights you have to the property. When a specific flaw has been found and is documented in the potential register, qualified titles are given. Even more uncommon than possessory titles are these solve. When the deed is recorded, the public is given constructive notice of who owns the real estate.

To learn more about  title, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/17137302

#SPJ1

Over-the-counter drugs that are often used can be dangerous for drivers. The adverse effects of cold and allergy medications, sleep aids, and other over-the-counter (OTC) drugs can include sleepiness, nausea, and impaired vision, which can put everyone on the road in danger.

Since they impede coordination, judgment, and response times, alcohol, marijuana, and other substances can make it difficult to drive. Methamphetamine and cocaine both increase aggression and recklessness among driving.

OTC or nonprescription medications are other names for over-the-counter drugs. These phrases all refer to medications that are available over the counter. When used according to the instructions on the label and those given by your healthcare provider, they are safe and effective.

Learn more about drugs Visit: brainly.com/question/26254731

#SPJ4