What major problems did the Europeans introduce into the Americas
Answers
Answer:
Colonization ruptured many ecosystems, bringing in new organisms while eliminating others. The Europeans brought many diseases with them that decimated Native American populations. Colonists and Native Americans alike looked to new plants as possible medicinal resources.
Explanation:
Related Questions
What mood is the song "You'll be Back" setting?
The song is about King George III's reaction to the colonists declaring independence.
Answers
Answer: In the musical Hamilton, King George the 111 reacts to the colonist declaring independence. Listen to the song ill be back to analyze his reaction. What mood is this song setting its fake and sarcastic. He seems freindly but hes not. 2.How is he reacting to the colonist deciding to declare independance.
Explanation: Give me the brainliest
The European voyages of discovery primarily originated with competition between the Protestant and Catholic churches. for the riches of the spice trade. to create larger empires as a mark of power.
Answers
The European voyages of discovery primarily originated to create larger empires as a mark of power. The main driving force behind the European voyages of discovery was the desire to establish and expand empires as a symbol of power and influence.
European nations, including Spain, Portugal, England, France, and the Netherlands, embarked on exploratory expeditions to stake claims, establish colonies, and secure valuable resources.During the Age of Exploration, the concept of mercantilism gained prominence, which emphasized the accumulation of wealth and resources as a measure of national power. European powers sought to control trade routes, establish colonies for resource extraction, and gain dominance over lucrative markets.While the quest for the riches of the spice trade did play a role in motivating exploration, it was not the primary driver. The pursuit of wealth and resources, including spices, was intertwined with the broader ambition of creating larger empires and expanding political influence.
learn more about voyages here :
https://brainly.com/question/30647713
#SPJ11
60 points!!!
In at least 150-200 words, compare and contrast the First and Second Continental Congress.
Answers
The Second Continental Congress: met to defend the colonies
The First Continental Congress was called to address grievances against the British government.
The Second Continental Congress was initially called for the same reason, but once it voted to declare independence it acted as the defacto government of an independent nation.
The First Congress started a boycott of British goods and a Second Continental Congress.
The Second Continental Congress created the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.
Answer:
Explanation:
The First Continental Congress: met in response to the Intolerable Acts.
The Second Continental Congress: met to defend the colonies
The First Continental Congress was called to address grievances against the British government.
The Second Continental Congress was initially called for the same reason, but once it voted to declare independence it acted as the defacto government of an independent nation.
The First Congress started a boycott of British goods and a Second Continental Congress.
The Second Continental Congress created the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.
Prior to the 1800s, what were days of thanksgiving meant to celebrate? support your answer with details from the text.
Answers
In 1800, Thanksgiving Day stated that it was necessary to thank God for all the graces received during a year.
Before the 1800s, the celebration of Thanksgiving on a certain day each year was not a tradition.
People celebrated thanksgiving during that time in order to thank God for ending a famine or drought condition in a place.
Thanksgiving was celebrated in order to be grateful for everything that he had given mankind.
People celebrated Thanksgiving in order to thank God for the food and other life conditions.
To learn more about thanksgiving,
https://brainly.com/question/29415571
#SPJ4
What was the primary indicator for selecting officer positions in the Mongol army?
Answers
The primary indicator for selecting officer positions in the Mongol army was based on the merits
What is army?A fighting organization that fights largely on land is known as an army, ground force, or field force. It is, in the largest context, a nation's or a state's land-based military organization, uniformed service, or enlisted.
By elevating soldiers upon merit instead of using clan precedence as it had been previous Genghis, Mongol leaders secured loyalty and boosted their prospects of victory. They have a sizable army and were the ones who were well-trained.
Learn more about army, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/877121
#SPJ1
John Cabot discovered what we now know as the East Coast of the United States in 1497 and claimed it for Great Britain, but they did not colonize the area for more than 100 years. Why was there such a long gap?
A. They didn’t want to settle there until they could bring slaves.
B. They were waiting to see if the Native Americans would leave the area.
C. They were too poor.
D. They were busy with dozens of other colonies.
Answers
Answer:
D. They were busy with dozens of other colonies.
Explanation:
The reason why it took more than 100 years for Great Britain to colonize the East Coast of the United States after John Cabot discovered it in 1497 is that colonization efforts began in the late 16th century with failed attempts by England to establish permanent colonies in the North.
It was not until the early 17th century that successful colonies were established in Virginia and Massachusetts.
I hope this helps
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Menominee Tribe v. United States?
The U.S. government could tax American Indian land.
The U.S. government could not sell American Indian land.
The U.S. government could stop funding schools on American Indian reservations.
The U.S. government could not take away American Indian hunting and fishing rights.
Answers
The Supreme Court ruling in the Menominee Tribe case was that the government could not take away the tribe's hunting and fishing rights.
What was Menominee Tribe v. United States case law?The court had to decide whether any right of the tribes was infringed in the Menominee Termination Act, If yes they are liable for compensation and if not no compensation is required. The court ruled that the Termination Act did not invalidate the basic right of the tribe, i.e. hunting and fishing.
It did not abolish the tribe, it merely ended supervision of the tribe. It was held that that tribe agreed to the site as it was suited for hunting. So the supreme court ruled that tribe's hunting and fishing rights stays protected.
Therefore, it can be said that option D appropriately describes the above given statement.
Learn more about Menominee Tribe v. United States here:
https://brainly.com/question/279704
Answer:
The U.S. government could not take away American Indian hunting and fishing rights.
Explanation:
I got it right on the test.
4. Why did people
learning crafts
improve the
village's
economy?
Answers
Answer:
it helped improve the economy by letting other people know how to make the craft too.
Explanation: if someone knows how to weave a basket and taught
another person then they now know how to do it too.
FEMA was created from the Congressional Act of:
1803, which is considered the first piece of disaster legislation.
1856, following the London Fire Act of that same year.
1889, as part of the California National Disaster Legislation.
1905, when FEMA was known as the National Disaster Group.
Answers
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) was not created from any of the options provided. So none of the option is considered correct.
FEMA was established through the Congressional Act of 1979, signed into the law by President Jimmy Carter on April 1, 1979. This Act merged several existing federal agencies responsible for the emergency management and created FEMA as a separate entity under the Department of Homeland Security.
FEMA's primary role is to coordinate and respond to the disasters and emergencies in the United States, providing assistance and support to affected communities. So none of the option is considered correct.
To learn more about FEMA, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30761652
#SPJ11
what kinds of abilities lead success in imperial Rome and China?
Answers
Competent army and good roads in Rome were factors that made them successful while in China, it was the number they had in terms of their population.
What made Rome successful?Through a mix of military prowess, political adaptability, economic growth, and more than a little good fortune, Rome rose to become the most powerful state in the world by the first century BCE. The Mediterranean region as well as Rome itself were both altered by this development.
The rigorous training the troops underwent required them to march 20 kilometers per day while wearing full armor. The Roman troops were therefore exceptionally well-prepared and organized. During training, soldiers learned specialized warfare tactics and maneuvers while marching in line.
Read more on Ancient Rome here: https://brainly.com/question/7539282
#SPJ1
What city became the official Capital of NM after becoming a royal colony?
1.Albuquerque
2.El Paso
3.Santa Fe
4.Taos
Answers
Answer:
Santa Fe, Mexico!
Your welcome!
Explanation:
Thanks! Your welcome! Easy! No problem! Np! Thanks so much! Plz give brainliest! Love, and thanks, and stars bye!
Answer:
Santa Fe
Explanation:
In 1919, the Treaty of Versailles determined that: 1). Germany was to accept sole responsibility for the war 2). To pay 33 billion dollars in reparations 3). Lost territory to France, Poland, and Denmark – 4). Germany stripped of colonies in Africa – 5). German armed forces nearly eliminated Germany had to provide free coal to France. But Germany was not divided up into smaller parts after WW I, and it was not occupied by the victorious armed forces of the United States, Britain, and France. Were the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles fair to Germany considering their role in the war, or were they overly punishing? Please explain your reasoning.
Answers
The provisions of the Treaty of Versailles were widely regarded as unfair and overly punishing towards Germany, as they exacerbated economic hardships, territorial losses, and political instability within the country.
The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh conditions on Germany that were seen by many as excessive and punitive. Germany was forced to accept sole responsibility for the war, pay significant reparations, cede territories, and relinquish its colonies. These provisions placed a heavy economic burden on Germany and contributed to social and political unrest within the country.
While it is true that Germany played a significant role in initiating and escalating the war, the severity of the treaty's terms is often criticized for exacerbating tensions and creating a sense of injustice. Many historians argue that the harshness of the treaty led to feelings of humiliation and resentment among the German population, which eventually contributed to the rise of extremism and the outbreak of World War II.
to learn more about Treaty of Versailles click here:
brainly.com/question/1800157
#SPJ11
WHO WAS THE FIRST PRIESIEDENT OF AFRICA?
Answers
Answer:what part of afrcan?
Explanation:
the co-conspirators responsible for the bombing of the federal building in oklahoma city planned their attack for the anniversary of what event:
Answers
The co-conspirators responsible for the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City planned their attack for the anniversary of the Waco siege.
On April 19, 1993, the siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, ended in a deadly confrontation between the members of the religious sect and federal law enforcement agencies. This event became a significant inspiration for the attackers, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.
McVeigh, an anti-government extremist, sought revenge for what he perceived as government overreach and a violation of constitutional rights. By selecting the Waco siege anniversary as their target date, the co-conspirators aimed to symbolically strike against the perceived oppressors and rally support for their extremist ideology.
Learn more about Timothy McVeigh at
https://brainly.com/question/979394
#SPJ11
Everything in the box below is an example of:
•British parliament
•Virginia house of burgesses
•the United States house and senate.
A.) a boycott
B.) an unalienable right
C.) a traitor
D.) a congress
Answers
Answer:D
Explanation:
Answer:
the right answer is option number D. which is a congress
Which are accurate tatement about Queen Elizabeth I of England and her reign? Chooe Three
Answers
The decision by Elizabeth not to wed sparked a lot of debate on a national and international level. At the time, it was generally accepted that only men were equipped to rule and that a woman's place was as a wife.
Beyond this idea, however, there were significant dynastic and diplomatic risks associated with a potential royal union. The Tudor line would terminate if Elizabeth died childless, and her Catholic cousin Mary, Queen of Scots, would succeed to the throne in England. The prospect of a Catholic king was seen by Protestants as a terrifying threat that would be best avoided if Elizabeth delivered a Protestant heir. The queen's choice of husband was crucial for the complex web of affairs, including the issue of succession.
learn more about Elizabeth here:
https://brainly.com/question/12205882
#SPJ4
Which one of the following was not a Protestant Reformer?
Martin Luther
John Knox
John Calvin
Ignatius Loyola
Answers
What is known in the U.S. as the Mexican-American War is called by Mexicans ""La Intervención Estadounidense""—the U.S. Intervention? Describe the history of that conflict and explain why Mexicans remember it as an illegitimate intervention.
Answers
important events in the US Mexicans refer to the U.S. Intervention, also known as "La Intervención Estadounidense," in history as the Mexican-American War. Mexicans view it as an unlawful intervention.
While Mexicans refer to this conflict as "The U.S. Invasion," the majority of American historians refer to it as "The Mexican-American War."
It was caused by the American annexation of the Republic of Texas in 1845 and a disagreement over whether Texas ended at the Rio Grande or the Nueces River (as claimed by Mexico). The first American armed battle to be fought mostly abroad was the Mexican-American War (1846–1848). It put President James K. Polk's expansionist administration against a politically fractured and militarily unprepared Mexico.
Read more about Mexican-American War at
https://brainly.com/question/1721250
#SPJ4
how old are these historic people when they died? - George Washington, Adolf Hitler, Charles Dickens, and Christopher Columbus
Answers
Answer:
GW-67
AH-56
CD-58
CC-55
Explanation:
Answer:
George Washington: 67
Adolf Hitler: 56
Charles Dickens: 58
Christopher Columbus: 55
Explanation:
which identifies an important strength of the Articles of Confederation?
Answers
Answer: Here is the Correct Option with my own: Strength is an Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
Strength 1. Congress could declare war and start an army and navy.
Strength 2. They could make peace and sign treaties.
Strength 3. They can borrow money.
Strength 4. They can organize a post office.
How did economics drive Japan into WWII?
Answers
Answer:
Japan in essentials of raw materials such as iron, coal, and gas it got from either hostility in China or the U.S. trades.
New France was located in what is today
A. the eastern United States.
B. the eastern provinces of Canada.
C. Canada and the United States.
D. islands of the Caribbean.
Answers
Answer:
C. Canada and the United States.
Explanation:
Summarize the breakup of the Kingdom of Israel, Babylonian Captivity, and the return of the Jews to their homeland under the Persian Empire.
Answers
The breakup of the Kingdom of Israel led to two kingdoms being formed. The second kingdom was captured by the Babylonians and the Jews were then allowed to come back to their homeland thanks to the Persian empire.
What happened to the Kingdom of Israel after the death of King Solomon?After King Solomon died, his son, King Rehoboam took over the throne. The people of Israel rebelled against him which led to the breakup of the Kingdom of Israel into the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah. The Kingdom of Israel was defeated by the Assyrian empire and destroyed. The Kingdom of Judah lasted for a time until it was defeated by the Babylonian empire, which then took them into captivity in what was the Babylonian Captivity.
The Jews were not allowed to return to their homeland under the Babylonians. However, the Persian empire then defeated the Babylonians and were kinder to the Jews. They allowed some of them to return to their homeland and rebuild Jerusalem and the Temple of God.
Find out more on the Babylonian Captivity at https://brainly.com/question/17670002
#SPJ1
The next best alternative given up when making a choice is called the what?
Answers
Answer: opportunity cost
Explanation: it means the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
What is the main idea of the argument in this passage?
Answers
Answer:
What is the main idea of the argument in this passage?
I think this question is incomplete .
hope it is helpful to you
Animal cells obtain energy by
Answers
Answer: cellular respiration
Explanation:
process that releases energy by combining glucose and oxygen.
Marcus is a winemaker in ancient Rome. Each harvest, he buys grapes from the farmers outside Rome, and makes them into wine which he sells at the market in Rome. There are many other vendors who compete with each other, and the plebians are used to buying wine for exactly 15 denarii (currency) per bottle. This price has never gone up or down as long as Marcus has been alive. The grapes that go into a bottle of wine cost 10 denarii in a normal year but fluctuate with each harvest.
The farmers outside Rome produce more grapes than usual in a good year causing prices to fall below their normal level, and less grapes than normal in a drought. Last summer, there was a major drought that led to a poor harvest, causing grape input prices to soar to 20 denarii per bottle, (as stated previously, wine prices always stay the same). Marcus almost went bankrupt and drained most of his savings since he couldn’t buy any grapes to make wine. He is unsure of this year’s harvest and seeks to protect himself from future price shocks.
That spring, he speaks to a farmer in the countryside to guarantee himself a predetermined price ahead of time. The farmer agrees to enter a contract with Marcus to sell him enough grapes to make his wine for the year. They agree ahead of time, so that the grapes will be locked in at a fixed price of 12 denarii. Assume neither Marcus nor the farmer can break out of the contract and must buy/sell the grapes from each other at agreed upon 12 denarii.
Questions
1. This year, there is another drought, and grape prices again go up to 20 denarii. Consider what happens to Marcus and the farmer in this case. Does anyone "win" in this agreement?
2. Consider the risk that Marcus has normally been taking by buying grapes at the market price after each harvest. How does this risk change when he enters into the contract? Consider the cases where grape prices rise, fall, or stay the same.
3. Now consider the risk the farmer normally takes when he produces and sells grapes at the market after each harvest. How does his risk change if he enters the contract with Marcus?
4. Does either Marcus or the farmer always "win" in this situation? Can there be any mutually beneficial contract for both parties?
5. Do you think entering into the contract with the farmer is a good idea for Marcus? What incentivizes Marcus and the farmer to enter into these contracts every year?
6. The farmer is deciding whether or not to sell none, some, or all of his usual grape harvest through these contracts. What tradeoffs does the farmer incur in each case and what do you think he should do?
Answers
1. In the case of another drought, where grape prices again increase to 20 denarii, the agreement made between Marcus and the farmer will benefit Marcus because he has guaranteed the grapes at a fixed price of 12 denarii.
2. Normally, Marcus bears the risk of price fluctuations in the open market while buying grapes for wine-making.
3. The farmer takes a risk every year in producing and selling the grapes on the open market, as they do not know whether they will be able to sell their entire harvest and at what price.
4. It's not necessarily true that one party always wins in this situation. However, by entering into this agreement, both parties can gain some benefits.
5. Entering into this contract is an excellent idea for Marcus as it provides a fixed price and secures his supply chain, ensuring that he can continue to produce and sell wine at the same price.
6. If the farmer sells his entire harvest through these contracts, he will be at risk of losing out on the potential higher profits he could have made by selling grapes on the open market.
1. In the case of another drought, where grape prices again increase to 20 denarii, the agreement made between Marcus and the farmer will benefit Marcus because he has guaranteed the grapes at a fixed price of 12 denarii. However, the farmer loses out in this situation, as he could have made a higher profit if he had sold the grapes on the open market instead of at a lower price to Marcus.
2. Normally, Marcus bears the risk of price fluctuations in the open market while buying grapes for wine-making. However, in this case, he is protected from price fluctuations as the farmer and Marcus have entered into a fixed-price contract. Thus, Marcus will pay 12 denarii for every bottle, regardless of the harvest's quality. As a result, the risk Marcus takes decreases.
3. The farmer takes a risk every year in producing and selling the grapes on the open market, as they do not know whether they will be able to sell their entire harvest and at what price. The farmer is not exposed to the same level of risk as they were before, as they now have a guaranteed customer and can sell the grapes at a fixed price.
4. It's not necessarily true that one party always wins in this situation. However, by entering into this agreement, both parties can gain some benefits. A mutually beneficial contract can be made if both the farmer and Marcus agree on a fixed price that is advantageous to both.
5. Entering into this contract is an excellent idea for Marcus as it provides a fixed price and secures his supply chain, ensuring that he can continue to produce and sell wine at the same price. For farmers, it's an attractive offer because it reduces their risk exposure. Marcus is incentivized to enter into these contracts because they offer stability in his business, while the farmer is incentivized to do so because they offer a reliable source of income.
6. If the farmer sells his entire harvest through these contracts, he will be at risk of losing out on the potential higher profits he could have made by selling grapes on the open market. On the other hand, selling none of his harvests means he's entirely exposed to market risks. Therefore, it is ideal for the farmer to sell a portion of his harvest via these contracts while still selling the remaining on the open market to maximize profits.
Know more about Drought here:
https://brainly.com/question/6818677
#SPJ8
The word barbarian comes from Rome and means?
Answers
Answer:
Late in the Roman Empire, the word “barbarian” came to refer to all foreigners who lacked Greek and Roman traditions, especially the various tribes and armies putting pressure on Rome's borders.
Explanation:
please help me!!!!!! PLEASE I'LL MARK YOU BRAINLIST
What struggles did the suffragettes have to suffer through to pass the 19 th Amendment
Answers
whose power is increased by the department of homeland security ?
Answers
Answer:
Law enforcement
Explanation:
Hope this helped!!!