Answers
Second amendment to the U.S constitution provided a constitutional check on congressional power under Article I Section 8 to organize, arm, and discipline the federal militia.
Explain Second amendment to the U.S constitution.
The right to keep and bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment (sometimes known as Amendment II) of the US Constitution. It and the other nine Bill of Rights provisions were approved on December 15, 1791. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court stated for the first time that people have the right to self-defense in the home. However, the court added in dicta that this right is not unrestricted and does not eliminate the existence of some long-standing prohibitions, such as those that prohibit "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons." The Supreme Court decided in McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) that state and municipal governments.
To study more about U.S constitution
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Related Questions
This week we learned about the structure and operation of the court systems in the US. If you had the power to change the court system in the United States, what changes would you implement? Explain your answer. It has to be something tangible you would do. "Be more fair" for example is not an actual measurable thing that you could change.
Answers
The Court based its decision on other factors because the tangible could not be based because it was the easy to recognize and argued about how it was equal in these factors.
What is Segregation?Segregation is defined as the separation of an individual or group of individuals from a larger group through race, age and caste etc.
The Court based its decision on factors other than the tangible factors in the Negro and white schools because the effects of segregation needed to be observed closely.
Learn more about Segregation here:
brainly.com/question/152256
#SPJ1
im trying not to fail answer this to get points XD ,
Answers
Answer:
?????
Questions???
Explanation:
What is the question?
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answers
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answers
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
\( \: \: \: \: \)
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps\( \: \: \: \: \: \)
how did the rise of radicals in france impact wwi
Answers
The rise of radicals in France had a significant impact on WWI. The radicalization of French politics resulted in a more aggressive and interventionist foreign policy, which led to France's participation in the war.
The radicals also played a key role in shaping the social and economic policies of France during the war, which in turn influenced the country's military strategy and ability to fight.
Additionally, the radicalization of French society led to a rise in political extremism and social unrest, which further complicated the country's ability to effectively wage war.
Overall, the rise of radicals in France had both positive and negative impacts on the country's involvement in WWI.
Read more about World War 1 at https://brainly.com/question/12233146
#SPJ11
Create a 500-word document that you will present to the court that summarizes your position and identifies any other cases you identified before Gideon’s claim in which defendants had been denied the right to counsel. Also, identify at least two court cases that later used the Gideon decision to argue for other defendants’ right to counsel
Answers
To the Court,
I am writing to present my position on the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the defendant, Clarence Gideon, was denied the right to counsel in his criminal trial. I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights.
As you may be aware, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to counsel for all criminal defendants. However, this right has not always been upheld in practice. In the past, there have been numerous cases in which defendants have been denied the right to counsel, either because they could not afford an attorney or because they were not provided with one by the state.
Before Gideon's case, there were several notable examples of defendants being denied the right to counsel. For example, in Betts v. Brady (1942), the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a defendant who had been denied counsel on the grounds that the state had not provided him with an attorney. Similarly, in Powell v. Alabama (1932), the Court upheld the convictions of several defendants who had been denied counsel in a capital case, despite the fact that they had requested one.
These cases demonstrate a clear pattern of defendants being denied the right to counsel in violation of their constitutional rights. In Gideon's case, he was similarly denied the right to counsel, despite his repeated requests for an attorney. As a result, he was forced to represent himself in his criminal trial and was ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison.
Gideon's case was eventually appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in his favor and held that the right to counsel was a fundamental right that applied to all criminal defendants, regardless of their ability to pay. The Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was a landmark ruling that established the principle of equal justice under the law and ensured that all criminal defendants would have the right to counsel in the future.
The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. For example, in Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972), the Court applied the Gideon decision to hold that defendants in non-capital cases have the right to counsel, even if they cannot afford one. Similarly, in Scott v. Illinois (1979), the Court used the Gideon decision to hold that states are required to provide counsel to indigent defendants in all criminal cases, regardless of the severity of the charges.
In conclusion, I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights. The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. I hope that this summary of my position and the relevant case law helps the Court to understand the importance of the right to counsel and its role in ensuring equal justice under the law.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. With specific reference to the law of contract discuss.
Answers
Answer:
The reference about the law used is its clarity, efficiency and specificity.
Explanation:
When people claim that "law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law," they mean that the law allows us to get specific answers from right and wrong, and not assumptions and concepts about what is right and wrong within. of a society, that is, if the law does not tolerate assumptions, the theory has no place within the law.
This can be seen, because a theory is an assumption about how something happens and an assumption of the events that cause it to happen.
The law is something clear, direct, dynamic and practical, which shows a certainty and not an assumption.
I have the answer now .
Answers
yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day
If you need any other help thought comment in the comments
Democratic vs Republican view on gun control
Answers
John buys a speedboat in the name of the partnership without the knowledge of his partner
Explain whether the contract concluded by John and William respectively would be binding
Answers
In a partnership, all partners have the authority to bind the partnership in contracts as long as their actions are within the scope of the partnership's business. However, if a partner, such as John, buys a speedboat in the name of the partnership without the knowledge of his partner William, the contract may not be binding.
Firstly, if the purchase of the speedboat is not related to the partnership's business, it would likely be considered an unauthorized act, and the contract would not be binding. William would need to show that John's actions were not within the scope of the partnership.
Secondly, if the partnership agreement explicitly requires mutual consent for such purchases, then John's actions would be a breach of the partnership agreement, and the contract would not be binding on the partnership.
In summary, the contract concluded by John and William for the purchase of a speedboat may not be binding if it is an unauthorized act or if it breaches the terms of the partnership agreement. To determine the contract's enforceability, one must evaluate the scope of the partnership's business and the specific terms of the partnership agreement.
To learn more about partnership business, visit: https://brainly.com/question/15913927
#SPJ11
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answers
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Question 1
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain why the red Mustang should be given
right-of-way at this intersection,
Answers
Answer: because the mustang is on the right so they have the right away
Explanation:
Answer:
The mustang has the right of way because they got the the stop sign first
Explanation:
(T/F) sexual selection does not seem to be an important factor in the evolution of sexual dimorphism.
Answers
False. sexual selection is widely recognized as one of the most important factors in the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Sexual dimorphism is the physical differences between males and females of the same species, which often result from differences in mating behaviors and sexual selection.
In many cases, males have evolved exaggerated traits such as larger body size, bright colors, or elaborate ornaments to attract mates or compete with other males for access to mates. These traits are often costly to maintain, but are favored by selection because they enhance reproductive success. Therefore, sexual selection is a major driving force behind the evolution of sexual dimorphism in many species.
learn more about sexual here:
https://brainly.com/question/30096294
#SPJ11
11. Which of the following rights does the 14th Amendment guarantee?
a. Due process and equal protection
b. Due process and an end to slavery
c. Equal protection and an end to slavery
d. Equal protection and the right to vote for all qualified citizens
Answers
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
Answers
according to california law, a late payment penalty cannot be assessed to a
Answers
According to California law, a late payment penalty cannot be assessed to a person when the delay in payment was due to the dishonored payment instrument.The law states that a payment instrument is dishonored when it is not paid upon presentation due to lack of funds, payment stopped by the maker, or a similar reason.
In such cases, the party seeking payment must give a notice to the payer of the dishonored instrument in a timely manner. After receiving the notice, the payer must tender a replacement payment instrument, and any late payment penalties previously assessed must be waived.
In California, it is also unlawful to charge a late fee for rent payments when the delay is due to a dishonored check. This rule applies to all residential and commercial properties within the state.
To know more about California law visit-
brainly.com/question/32379761
#SPJ11
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
Answers
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
cooperation between states implies a loss of political sovereignty. group of answer choices false true
Answers
False .
Cooperation between states does not necessarily imply a loss of political sovereignty. While it is true that states may sometimes cede a degree of authority in certain areas to facilitate cooperation, this is often done with the understanding that the benefits of such cooperation outweigh the potential loss of autonomy. In many cases, states maintain their political sovereignty while engaging in cooperative agreements, treaties, or international organizations. It is important to recognize that cooperation can actually enhance the ability of states to exercise their sovereignty effectively, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world.
The question of whether cooperation between states implies a loss of political sovereignty is a complex one, and the answer depends on a variety of factors. At its core, political sovereignty refers to a state's ability to exercise authority and control over its territory and people, and to make decisions independently of external actors. The concept of sovereignty is closely linked to ideas of independence, autonomy, and self-determination, and is considered a foundational principle of modern international relations. However, it is important to note that cooperation does not necessarily imply a loss of sovereignty. In fact, many forms of international cooperation are based on the principle of sovereign equality among member states. This means that each state is considered equal in terms of its rights and responsibilities, and that decisions are made through consensus-building and negotiation rather than through imposition or coercion. In this sense, cooperation can actually strengthen a state's sovereignty by providing it with a platform to voice its interests and concerns on the global stage.
To know more about Cooperation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31784454
#SPJ11
A is an allegation of a recipient right being violated ta legal request to have an investigation open
Answers
A legal request to have an investigation opened is typically initiated when there is an allegation of a recipient's rights being violated.
This request aims to address and examine the alleged violation, ensuring that the recipient's rights are protected and justice is served. The request may involve submitting relevant evidence, providing detailed information about the alleged violation, and identifying the parties involved.
Once the request is made, authorities or relevant investigative bodies will conduct an investigation to determine the validity of the allegations and take appropriate actions based on the findings. This legal process plays a crucial role in upholding the rights of individuals and holding accountable those responsible for any violations.
Learn more about legal request
https://brainly.com/question/30462201
#SPJ4
Pretend you are the world's leading expert in all things Critical Incident Management. Because of your expertise, you often consult with businesses about emergency preparedness. Create a document to summarize what an Executive Policy Group is as well as why a business should have one. For this exercise we will pretend you are presenting to a new Tech company, breaking into the social media world with a new platform. Company has 100 employees total. Your proposal for the business's EPG should be a page or more in length.
Answers
An Executive Policy Group (EPG) is a critical component of a business's overall emergency preparedness strategy, particularly for a tech company like yours, entering the competitive social media platform market. With a workforce of 100 employees, establishing an EPG helps to ensure your organization is well-prepared for any potential critical incidents.
An EPG is a team of senior executives and key decision-makers responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining a comprehensive emergency response plan. This group ensures that the organization is well-equipped to handle critical incidents effectively and efficiently while minimizing potential impacts on operations, staff, and customers. Having an EPG is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures a systematic and coordinated response to emergencies, enabling your company to react promptly and minimize potential damage. Secondly, it demonstrates a commitment to employee safety and security, fostering a positive work environment and attracting top talent. Thirdly, it safeguards the company's reputation and brand image by showing stakeholders that your organization takes crisis management seriously.
Learn more about Executive here:
https://brainly.com/question/31129751
#SPJ11
emergence of federalism in Nigeria
Answers
Answer:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Explanation:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Hope this helped.
True or False: A bill must pass both houses of Congress before the President can
sign it. *
Answers
Answer:
true cuz I said
Explanation:
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
Answers
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
Officer Jerry stops Bridget on the street because he thinks her haircut is unattractive. During a pat-down search, he finds marijuana in her pocket. He then uses the discovery of the marijuana to get a warrant to search her home for drugs. The search uncovers eight kilos of cocaine. If she challenges the admissibility of both drugs, how should the court rule
Answers
Larry is told by Moe that Curly stole his prized business law book from his car. The next day Larry confronts Curly and slaps him repeatedly for stealing his book. Curly had Larry arrested for slapping him. Larry sues Curly for damages in the amount of the book and for maliciously having him arrested. Claiming that he lied, Curly sues Moe for defamation. The lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book involves which of the following?
a. Public law.
b. Private law.
c. Administrative law.
d. Both public and private law.
Answers
Answer:
i think its D
Explanation:
Both public and private law as the lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book. Hence, option D is correct.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is a civil legal proceeding in which one party files a claim against another the defendant, and the court makes the final decision.
Depending on the remedy sought and the jurisdiction where the plaintiff filed the complaint, a lawsuit filed in court to seek relief from or a remedy for a claimed injury may be tried by a court of law or a court of equity.
A lawsuit typically involves issues like breach of contract, financial difficulties, bodily harm, or property damage. The purpose of a lawsuit is for the plaintiff to demand that the defendant make amends for the wrongdoing or pay damages.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SPJ2
What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
Answers
Answer:
Amherst College
Explanation:
An applicant for a mortgage prints her tax records from the previous years to
present to the lending agency. Which of the following would have to occur to
make this action fraud?
A. The applicant refuses to hand over the tax records to the lender.
B. The applicant decides to include her spouse's records as well.
C. The applicant alters the records to be more favorable to her.
D. The applicant signs her name to the tax records,
Answers
THE EVALUATION/CRITICS/COMMENT ON THE REVIEW
Review on the highland tower of the incident to the citizens
Answers
Answer:
Although the criticism of every art will be based in the particularities that arise from its specific media, I am interested here in highlighting aspects of criticism applicable across the arts (and which are therefore relevant to film criticism). Equally, although the characteristics of evaluative criticism have developed through and in relation to written criticism, most of the aspects listed below would be germane to work currently taking place within audio-visual formats. I offer this interdisciplinary résumé because my experience is that many students of film studies ‘in the 21st Century’ are currently lacking an awareness of the practice of evaluative criticism.
Explanation:
Some might consider the phrase “evaluative criticism” tautological because the etymology of the word “criticism” implies evaluation. It is derived from the Greek word kritikos, which means to judge, and the kritikoi were the judges or jurymen who gave verdicts (often in competitions).
Mark is a famous syndicated radio personality for talkradio. He has a distinctive voice and manner of speaking. Moretalk hires gordon, who sounds nearly identical to mark, to host a competing show. Moretalk encourages gordon to imitate mark as closely as possible while on the air. Moretalk is most likely to be liable for.
Answers
Answer:
Moretalk is liable for voice phishing