What is the process where cases are allocated within a system once jurisdiction over the case is obtained. This format usually requires one of the defendants to be a resident of the parish in which the suit is filed. This is called

Answer:

it is how you characterize your self

Answer:

Lower Government Spending

Raise Taxes

Answer: ok he did it

Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.

"Nasa Diyos ang awa, nasa tao ang gawa." - A reminder to take action and responsibility in the current situation.

"Nasa Diyos ang awa, nasa tao ang gawa."

Explanation: This proverb emphasizes the importance of taking action and responsibility in the current situation. It implies that while we can seek God's mercy and guidance, it is ultimately up to us to make a difference and bring about positive change.

This saying is relevant in reminding individuals to actively participate and contribute to improving the present circumstances. The bookmark can serve as a daily reminder to be proactive and accountable in facing challenges and making a difference in one's own life and the community.

Learn more about reminder

brainly.com/question/33438822

#SPJ11

Timothy has had some type of contact with New York. Long-arm Statutes allow state courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over non-residents if the defendant has certain contacts with the state.

Therefore, the New York court must find that Timothy engaged in some type of activity or transaction within their state, such as owning property, forming contracts, or performing activities specific to New York. This will allow the New York court to have jurisdiction over Timothy, even though he is a resident of Texas.

If the court is able to establish personal jurisdiction over Timothy, then it can move forward with the tort claim that Ellis is bringing against him.

To know more about New York , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12164635

#SPJ4

The theory that was created as a result of studies showing informal sanctions to be the source of most deterrent effects for individuals is known as the Social Control Theory. This theory posits that an individual's behavior is influenced by their social bonds and the strength of those bonds.

If an individual has strong bonds with their family, friends, and community, they are less likely to engage in deviant behavior. However, if their bonds are weak or nonexistent, they are more likely to engage in deviant behavior. The creation of the Social Control Theory was based on the idea that informal sanctions, such as disapproval from loved ones or ostracism from a social group, have a greater deterrent effect than formal sanctions, such as fines or imprisonment.

Learn more about theory here:https://brainly.com/question/24459469

#SPJ11

Answer:

no options

Explanation:

Answer:

fire

Explanation:

A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, except fire.

A plant that may be widely cultivated and harvested for food or profit is considered to be a crop.  A crop is what is produced when many plants of the same sort are grown in one location. Most plants are grown in hydroponic systems or through agriculture. Macroscopic fungi (like mushrooms) and marine macroalga (like seaweed) are examples of crops, some of which are raised in aquaculture.

Crop-hail insurance is a type of insurance that covers loss and destruction brought on by both fire and hail. It is a product that farmers buy to safeguard agricultural goods while they are still in the field and unharvested.

Therefore, Thus option(C) is correct.

Learn more about crops here:

https://brainly.com/question/801194

#SPJ2

Answer:

false

Explanation:

There are 41 district courts which is nowhere near 100. There's 13 circuit courts so that was 1 number off. Lastly there is only one Supreme Court so the last one is correct but overall the statement is false.

Answer:

Quartz in mirrors

Graphite in pencil leads

Steel from knobs and hinges

Explanation:

The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.

The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.

Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.

To know more about Nixon's  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1131063

#SPJ11

The right of sexual assault victims to be paid for forensic exams is not a right granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions.

Crime victims' rights are legal rights granted to victims of crimes in many jurisdictions around the world. These rights are designed to ensure that victims are treated with dignity and respect, and that they have a voice in the criminal justice system. Some common rights granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions include the right to be informed, present, and heard at important criminal justice proceedings, the right to receive compensation for their losses, and the right to protection from the accused. While some jurisdictions do provide financial assistance to sexual assault victims for forensic exams, this is not considered a right granted to crime victims in all jurisdictions. Similarly, while some jurisdictions do require HIV testing of sex offenders and notification of the results, this is not universally recognized as a right of crime victims. Therefore, the right of sexual assault victims to be paid for forensic exams is not a right granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions.

To learn more about sexual assault victims, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10386606

#SPJ11

Vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in size, location, and other factors.

When comparing vacant land parcels for valuation or appraisal purposes, it is essential to adjust for differences in various aspects. Some common factors that require adjustments include:
1. Size: Larger or smaller parcels of land may have different values per square foot or acre, so adjustments need to be made to ensure a fair comparison.
2. Location: The value of land can be heavily influenced by its location, such as proximity to amenities, access to transportation, and surrounding development patterns. Therefore, adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
3. Topography: The physical characteristics of the land, such as slope, soil type, and drainage, can impact its value and development potential. Adjustments may be necessary to account for these variations.
4. Zoning and land use restrictions: Different zoning regulations and land use restrictions can significantly impact the value of a parcel of land. Adjustments need to be made to account for these differences when comparing parcels.
5. Utilities and infrastructure: The availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity, etc.) and access to infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) can affect the value of vacant land. Adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
Vacant land adjustments are crucial in accurately assessing the value of land parcels for various purposes, such as real estate transactions or property taxes. These adjustments ensure a fair comparison between parcels by accounting for differences in size, location, and other factors.

For more information on Vacant land adjustments kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/14415858

#SPJ11

Answer:

1325

Explanation:

there u go mate

Answer:

1325

Explanation:

The three ways may include poverty and its correlates, geographic area of residence, race and ethnicity, gender, age, language spoken, and disability status.

Factors that influence the delivery of health services in South Africa are technology, Healthcare product and service prices, Market power, Health insurance coverage, Demographics and patient characteristics.

These factors greatly affected the delivery of health services in South Africa.

There is lack of advance technology that provide by the health services in the country as well as high prices of the services which can't afford by the patient.

Learn more about healthcare services, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13034150

#SPJ1

As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be Georgia.

The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.

Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.

Find out more on original venues at https://brainly.com/question/342388.

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

The A can get a prohibitory injunction in equity and stop B from spraying the land with pesticides, even though A claims compensation at law.

Injunctions, specific performance, and prohibitory injunctions are some examples of equitable remedies. An injunction is a court order telling someone to stop doing something that is against the law. Injunctions and particular performance are the two primary equitable remedies, and in informal legal jargon, allusions to equitable remedies are sometimes phrased as referring to those two remedies alone.

An injunction can be prohibitive, preventing someone from doing something, or mandatory, ordering them to do something. The harm includes payment for the "market value" of your animal as well as related "economic damages" such as veterinarian costs. Additionally, noneconomic and punitive damages may be awarded in certain circumstances, such as when the individual intentionally hurt your animal.

To learn more about punitive damages, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14001157

#SPJ1

The Philippine Constabulary served as the core of a national police force that combined these disparate and fragmented local police groups.

A new Constitution was adopted during the People's Revolution in 1986 and it established a police force that is "national in scope and civilian in character."

OUR COMMAND

The Philippine National Police Reform and Reorganization Act of 1998, as revised by Republic Act 6975, An Act Establishing the Philippine National Police under a Reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government and Other Purposes, and further amended by Republic Act 9708.

OUR PHILIPPIA

Justice, Service, and Honor

OUR PRINCIPLES

Maka-Diyos (Pro-God) (Pro-God)

Makabayan (Pro-Country)

Makatao (Pro-People)

Makakalikasan (Pro-Environment)

Learn more about  Philippine Constabulary here:

https://brainly.com/question/26599508

#SPJ9

Answer:

A: Self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, social skills, and empathy.

B: Unsure how to help

C: (a situation involving a single goal or option that has both desirable and undesirable aspects or consequences)

-I took a job that had very high pay and good benefits but was incredibly hard and demanded long hours.

-Meeting a friendly person with poor hygeine.

I know I didnt answer all of them but I hope these can help piece it together for you.

Based on the peculiarity of rule of law in different localities and the content of this question, when preparing this document, you must educate the judge on the procedural rules of your state court system.

The term Procedural rules of the state court systems are used to describe the law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the state court system.

Generally, it is believed that state court systems follow their own state rules of civil procedure which may be widely different from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).

Therefore, since the court case involved two local businesses, and to ensure there is fairness, the Judge should be aware of the procedural rules of your state court system to determine the right judgment.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the. the correct answer is option A. "the procedural rules of your state court system."

Learn more about the procedural rules here: https://brainly.com/question/28560902

#SPJ1

Following statutory authorization of an Aviation Section in the Signal Corps by the United States Congress in 1914, the Aeronautical Division continued as the primary organizational component of the section until April 1918, when its inefficiency in mobilizing for World War I caused the War Department to replace it with an organization independent of the Signal Corps that eventually became the foundation of the Army's Air Service.

Answer:

B .on the base

around the bullet

Answer:

women’s rights and discrimination based on gender

Explanation:

a bunch of articles will pop up if you look it up online

The restrictive covenant in a condominium complex prohibiting pets may be unlawful if it prevents a prospective buyer with a physical disability from relying on an animal to assist him.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), people with disabilities have the right to keep an animal as an accommodation in their residence. This includes condominium complexes, where the ADA requires reasonable accommodations to be made for people with disabilities, including the right to keep an assistance animal.

In addition, the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and requires reasonable accommodation for them to enjoy their housing.

Therefore, the restrictive covenant prohibiting pets may be unlawful if it denies the prospective buyer with a physical disability the ability to keep an animal as an accommodation.

Know more about restrictive covenant here

https://brainly.com/question/18523077#

#SPJ11

I would say police officers or health inspectors because they have the right to inspect any establishments with alcohol. Hope it helps :D