The Supreme Court of Pakistan is the highest court of the Pakistani judicial hierarchy. Its judiciary members now consist of Pakistan's chief justice and 15 senior judges, including Court of Appeals.
Who decides the size of the Supreme Court?The power to determine the size and composition of the Supreme Court is believed to lie with Congress, that initially established six-member Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice and five Deputy Justices by Judiciary Act of 1789.
What is the maximum number of Supreme Court Judges?The law sets the maximum number of judges in the Supreme Court at 30 judges (excluding the Chief Justice of India). The bill will increase that number from 30 to 33.
What is the number of people that can sit in the Supreme Court?Basically, the US Constitution gives Congress the power to decide how many judges sit on SCOTUS. This number ranged from 5 to 10, but has been fixed at 9 since 1869.
To learn more Supreme Court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4
Question 2 of 29 Read this passage: Candidate A receives 48 percent of the popular vote in a state during a presidential election, while Candidate B receives 41 percent and Candidate C receives 11 percent. For most states, what outcome would the election have? O A. Each of the candidates would receive some of the electoral votes. O B. Candidate A and Candidate B would split the state's electoral votes. O C. The state would have to cast new ballots until one candidate wins a majority O D. Candidate A would receive all of the state's electoral votes. SUBMIT
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Candidate A has the highest vote among all the candidates participating in the election.
Hence, in order to form a party two of the parties need to collaborate to form a government as none of the three candidates is in majority.
Therefore, the candidate B and C or A and B or A and C will share their votes to form a government.
Hence, option B is correct
Forensic Pathology
Forensic Computer Science
Criminalistics
Forensic Entomologist
Crime Scene Investigator
Firearm Examiner
Forensic Photographer
Questioned Document Examiner
Forensic Engineering
Trace Evidence Examiner
Forensic Odontology
Latent Print Examiner
Forensic Toxicologist
Forensic Serologist/Forensic Biologist
______________________ – (or Forensic Science) the application of science in collecting and analyzing physical evidence in criminal cases (court of law)
______________________– processes crime scenes to collect and preserve physical evidence
______________________– uses photographic techniques to document crime scenes and evidence, as well as provide image enhancements and exhibits for analysis and courtroom presentation
______________________– identifies and/or compares physical evidence through chemical, physical, and instrumental analysis
______________________– processes and examines latent fingerprints in criminal cases
______________________– processes, compares, and/or identifies biological evidence in criminal cases
______________________– examines body fluids and organs to determine the presence of drugs and poisons
______________________– studies the handwriting and typeface on questioned documents to determine their authenticity and/or origin
______________________– examines firearms and discharged ammunition; also conducts distance determination and tool mark examination
______________________– studies insects to estimate the time of death
______________________– collects and identifies data from computers and other digital devices
______________________– concerned with failure analysis, accident reconstruction, and causes and origins of fires or explosions
______________________– identifies and compares dental evidence in criminal cases
______________________ – a branch of medicine used for legal purposes and concerned with determining causes of death
Answer: im probly late fro this but...
Explanation:
1- Crime Scene Investigator
2- Criminalistics
3- Forensic Photographer
4- Trace Evidence Examiner
5- Latent Print Examiner
6- Forensic Serologist/Forensic Biologist
7- Forensic Toxicologist
8- Questioned Document Examiner
9- Firearm Examiner
10- Forensic Entomologist
11- Forensic Computer Science
12- Forensic Engineering
13- Forensic Odontology
14- Forensic Pathology
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?
1. A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
3. A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.
4. A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.
Answer:
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
Explanation:
Answer:
what she said
Explanation:
marie claims that a nebraska state statute infringes on her substantive due process rights. This claim focusses on
Marie's claim that a Nebraska state statute infringes on her substantive due process rights focuses on the constitutional principle of substantive due process. Substantive due process refers to the idea that certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution, even if they are not explicitly stated in the text. It recognizes that individuals have certain liberties that are fundamental to their personal autonomy, dignity, and freedom.
In Marie's case, she is asserting that the Nebraska state statute violates her substantive due process rights by imposing restrictions or limitations on her fundamental rights without a compelling justification. Substantive due process requires the government to have a legitimate and compelling interest to infringe upon an individual's fundamental rights and that the law or regulation in question is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
Marie's claim is based on the argument that the Nebraska state statute exceeds the permissible limits of government interference and unreasonably restricts her rights without a sufficient justification. By invoking substantive due process, Marie seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the statute and assert her fundamental rights as protected under the Constitution.
To know more about constitutional principle, please visit
https://brainly.com/question/29871396
#SPJ11
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called
a/an?
Answer:
Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal
How will you reduce the impact that separation has on your children?
what is a major concern about COMPSTATs effectiveness? -
Compstat as a policing tactic gained popularity as a result of the notable decline in crime that occurred in New York City in the 1990s.
Compstat has received a lot of attention from academics and police practitioners as an innovative management method in policing. Despite its widespread use, the scientific efficacy of the Compstat method has not received much empirical investigation. Few research has also focused on Compstat tactics used outside of New York City during the 2000s. The current study examined whether Compstat led to a noticeable increase in "broken windows" arrests (minor nuisance offenses) and, using multivariate time-series analysis, the role of the Compstat strategy in explaining changes in violent, property, and total index crimes. Compstat was used by the FWPD to analyze monthly time-series arrest and crime data over a multi-year period.
Learn more about Compstat here:
https://brainly.com/question/30022415
#SPJ11
Explain, In your own words, why the therapeutic alliance is so important in confronting offenders.
Answer:
A positive therapeutic alliance has many benefits one is it can reduce su-icide attempts among people with Borderline Personality Disorder in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. A confident “early working alliance” can also lead to a reduction in symptoms in chronically depressed patients. Overall this alliance can have a major affect on people.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking for but I hope this helps a bit
(I put a dash because I couldn't post with that word)
ince the late 1980s, the courts in texas have become more favorable to defendants in civil cases than to plaintiffs. why?
In general, more conservative than liberal justices have been elected.
The general public instances heard are from a petition for review. The highest appellate courtroom for criminal matters inside the country of Texas. The nine participants of this crook court docket are elected for 6-yr terms.
Famously, one case that become appealed three times become heard by means of three distinctive intermediate appellate courts in Texas. Another uncommon factor of Texas's appellate courtroom machine is the allocation of justices in election cycles. Every one of the 80 justices on those courts needs to stand for election every six years.
Learn more about liberal justices here https://brainly.com/question/14455326
#SPJ4
The seller told you that a car was the best car she ever owned and that you will love it; you've had one repair bill after another and hate the car. You can get your money back because the seller committed fraud.
true
false
Answer:
The answer is false ....
what is commercial transaction
a contract which is capable of being adjudged void, but is not void unless action is taken to make it so, is known as a?
A contract which is capable of being adjudged void, but is not void unless action is taken to make it so, is known as a voidable contract.
A voidable contract is a legally binding agreement that is initially valid and enforceable, but it contains a defect or legal flaw that gives one or both parties the option to either affirm the contract or declare it void.
Unlike a void contract, which is invalid from the beginning and has no legal effect, a voidable contract remains valid until the party with the power to void it exercises their right to do so.
The ability to void a contract typically arises due to certain legal grounds, such as misrepresentation, fraud, undue influence, duress, mistake, or incapacity.
Once a party discovers the defect and decides to take action, they can choose to either affirm the contract and continue with its performance or exercise their right to rescind or terminate the contract.
It is important to note that the party with the power to void the contract must take specific action within a reasonable time frame to declare the contract void. If they do not exercise their right to void the contract within the specified time or continue to act as if the contract is valid, the contract remains in force, and the parties are bound by its terms.
To learn more about contract, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32254040
#SPJ11
Suppose you are reading descriptions of job openings and notice one that says the individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement. What job description are you probably reading? abuse and social services manager social, community, and emergency manager disaster and emergency services manager child protective services manager
Answer:
What methods would you use to collect job analysis data? 2. You work in the human resource department of a large brewery in Atlantic Canada. You are in the process of writing job descriptions for all managerial and supervisory staff. One manager who is in the production division of the brewery refuses to complete a job analysis questionnaire.
Explanation:
The individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement is a description of an abuse and social services manager. Option A. This is further explained below.
What are social services?Generally, Social services are simply defined as services provided to groups that aid in the development of individuals.
In conclusion, A description of abuse and social services manager includes the ability to examine an organization and adopt strategies for improvement.
Read more about social services
https://brainly.com/question/15059623
#SPJ2
In practice, cyber information and misinformation are controlled by users and hosts, motivated mostly by their:
Phishing is a method of gaining personal information through the use of deceptive emails and websites. Phishers pose as reliable organizations in order to gather the target's sensitive information, such as usernames and passwords.
What cyber information, misinformation controlled users?These human hacking methods are frequently employed in cybercrime to deceive unsuspecting individuals into divulging information, spreading malware infections, or opening up restricted systems.
Therefore, A trick called social engineering uses human error to obtain goods, private information, or access
Learn more about cyber information here:
https://brainly.com/question/29024337
#SPJ1
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
curtis is driving a golf cart in the pebble creek subdivision. his phone rings and he looks down for a second and does not see kara who is jogging along the road. curtis runs into kara who falls and breaks her hip. kara files suit against curtis for negligence. what type of damages can kara seek?
Kara can seek damages for her physical injuries, medical expenses, emotional distress, pain and suffering, loss of income, and property damage.
In a negligence lawsuit, the court will consider the degree of fault attributed to each party and the amount of damages that are appropriate for the injured party's suffering. In this case, since Curtis was driving the golf cart and chose to look down at his phone without considering the safety of others, he can be found negligent.
Therefore, Kara can seek damages for the harm caused by Curtis’s negligence. Depending on the circumstances, Kara may also be able to seek punitive damages as well.
To know more about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Which attorney must maintain confidentiality and advise their client of the constitutional requirements of counsel, the privilege against self-incrimination, and the right to trial?
Prosecutor
Grand jury
Mediator
Defense
Answer:
Defense
Explanation:
The sole representative of the accused.
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
Failure to address the three questions of economics willl have what kind of impact on an economy
what incentives influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answer:
The incentives that influence decisions about exer- cise include forms of passive entertainment, like tele- vision and computer games. One incentive influenc- ing decisions about diet is the reduced cost of food.)
Explanation:
The elderly are rarely a target for criminals. true or false
Mica is an employee of Natural Gas Company and a member of a union of company employees. Under federal law, Mica and other union members have the right to
Answer:
a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.
Explanation:
As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.
Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
T/F when there has been more than one marriage, the first marriage is presumed to be valid.
The statement is true because, in most jurisdictions, the law presumes that the first marriage is valid until proven otherwise.
This is known as the "presumption of validity" principle. When there has been more than one marriage involving the same individual, the first marriage is generally presumed to be valid, and any subsequent marriage would be considered invalid, or void, until the validity of the first marriage is challenged and legally terminated.
This is typically done through divorce, annulment, or by providing evidence that the first marriage was never legally valid. The burden of proof falls on the party challenging the validity of the first marriage.
Learn more about marriage https://brainly.com/question/31599141
#SPJ11
For this question, we'll assume Maria's lawsuit against Dave moved to the
"discovery" phase.
a)In your own words, what is the purpose of the discovery process?
b)List two discovery tools and how each works. c)How might Maria use these discovery tools to discover relevant facts? For example,
how might she prove Dave was speeding? Use your imagination here.
Maria's use of discovery tools Interrogatories to inquire about Dave's actions and depositions to question Dave directly, potentially proving his speeding.
How can Maria use discovery tools to uncover relevant facts, such as proving Dave was speeding?The purpose of the discovery process is to allow each party in a lawsuit to gather relevant information and evidence from the opposing party and other sources. It aims to promote fairness, prevent surprises, and ensure that all parties have access to the same information before trial.
Two discovery tools commonly used are interrogatories and depositions.
Interrogatories are written questions submitted by one party to the other, which must be answered under oath. They help gather specific information, clarify positions, and uncover relevant facts.
Depositions involve oral testimonies given under oath, typically conducted in person or through video conferencing. Attorneys question witnesses, including the opposing party, who must provide truthful and detailed responses. Depositions help to obtain firsthand accounts, assess credibility, and gather additional information.
Maria can utilize these discovery tools to uncover relevant facts and potentially prove that Dave was speeding. For example:
Through interrogatories, Maria can ask Dave specific questions related to his actions before the incident, such as his speed, driving habits, or awareness of traffic laws. Dave's responses may provide insights into his behavior and potentially establish a pattern of speeding.
During depositions, Maria's attorney can question Dave directly about his driving habits, any previous speeding incidents, or his knowledge of the speed limit in the area where the incident occurred. Witnessing Dave's responses and assessing his demeanor may further support Maria's case if inconsistencies or admissions are revealed.
It's important to note that the specific facts and evidence required to prove Dave was speeding would depend on the circumstances of the case and the applicable laws. This explanation is a fictional scenario for illustrative purposes.
Learn more about discovery tools
brainly.com/question/29314286
#SPJ11
A researcher hypothesizes that inpatients who receive more visitors will self-report higher satisfaction with the level of care they receive. Which design would the researcher use to test the hypothesis
the researcher would likely use an observational study design. To test the hypothesis that inpatients who receive more visitors will self-report higher satisfaction with the level of care they receive.
Observational Study Design:
In an observational study design, the researcher would observe and record the number of visitors each inpatient receives and their corresponding self-reported satisfaction levels. The researcher would not actively intervene or manipulate the number of visitors but would simply observe and record the data. This design allows the researcher to study the relationship between the number of visitors and satisfaction levels in a naturalistic setting.
Correlational Study Design:
In a correlational study design, the researcher would collect data on the number of visitors and the self-reported satisfaction levels from a sample of inpatients. The researcher would then analyze the data to determine the correlation between the two variables. This design allows the researcher to examine the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of visitors and satisfaction levels but does not establish causality.
It's important to note that both observational and correlational study designs do not establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the variables. They only identify associations or correlations. If the researcher wants to establish causality and determine if the number of visitors directly influences satisfaction levels, they would need to use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, where participants are randomly assigned to different visitor conditions (e.g., high number of visitors, low number of visitors) to determine the effect on satisfaction levels.
To know more about hypothesizes, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18064632
#SPJ11
If James kill ruby and the lawyer lie to the law who is repunseble
Answer:
The lawyer is a trash bec. he is the only one that can keep the evidence and the crime. The lawyer only wants money he didnt want the true investigations...
And btw this app is trash amd the lawyer too
What have you done to prepare for a career in Law Enforcement?
I need help for a job application!!!! Please give me a Answer for this!
Okay,
I have completed a Bachelor of Arts in Criminology and Criminal Justice, and I am currently completing a Graduate Diploma in Legal Studies.
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but it is your experience that a warrant is always better. Instruct your personnel in what the appropriate initiation of the investigation should be. o To avoid issues with evidence collection,
what do you think should be done about the scene? Explain.
Who should be brought in immediately? Why?
• Where should you look for the owner of the property? Why?
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but warrants are always better in order to avoid illegal and unauthorized acts by officers due to unnecessary powers.
I would instruct the personnel subordinate to take warrants for the arrest of people unless it is a extraordinary situation and for maintaining public order it is necessary to do warrantless crime scene search. Doing this will improve the quality of investigative operations as warrant caries with it a sense of accountability for the officials. The habitual offenders of the area and security personnel should be brought in immediately as they are the closest suspects of crime in first instance.
For the owners of property, officials should look around the same places to escape as during arson, human instinct allows a person to find the safest place to survive the crisis.
To know more about Arson:
brainly.com/question/11857936
#SPJ1