What is the judge's role in jury deliberations? (Select all that apply.)
The judge is available to answer questions of law during deliberations.
None. Once the trial is sent to the jury, the judge has no responsibilities.
The judge guides the jury on legal questions while they are deliberating.
The judge gives instructions to the jury to help them during their deliberations.

Answer:

I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil

Explanation:

The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.

Doctrine applies in construction contracts and means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for Substantial performance Therefore the correct option is D.

Substantial performance is a doctrine that applies in construction contracts, and it means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for. This doctrine focuses on the idea of whether or not, even if there are minor mistakes or issues with the building's quality,

it still provides substantial performance to meet the standard of what was contracted for. The concept here is that if the overall quality of a building is close enough to meet the contract specifications and acceptable construction code requirements then any minor deficiencies can be overlooked.

Hence the correct option is D

To know more about Substantial performance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29434580

#SPJ4

Answer:

A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of law or a tribunal.:

Numerous federal and state laws have been passed in the field of law known as consumer protection in an effort to protect consumers from the risks present in the marketplace. Three specific consumer activities that have come under the purview of such legislation are as follows:

1. Purchases by consumers: This refers to the sale of products and services, as well as real estate, for private, domestic, or familial use. For instance, written warranties offered by vendors of consumer goods are covered under the Federal Warranty Protection. On the other hand, new automobile buyers have rights under lemon laws.

2. The use of consumer credit: It covers all credit agreements for purchases of commodities, services, or real estate made for private, domestic, or familial use. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) is applicable to a number of legal protections, such as banning discrimination in credit-granting.

3. Credit Remedies: There are many different types of creditor remedies, including wage assignments, garnishments, security interests in property, and debt collection techniques. Garnishment is only legal with a court order, and wage assignments guard against termination from employment. The credit card bill of rights places restrictions on credit card users' interest rates, notifications, payments, and penalties, and fair reporting forbids the use of inaccurate or out-of-date information in consumer reports. Protecting consumers from dishonest and misleading business practices, as well as faulty goods and services, is the responsibility of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other government consumer protection organizations, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

To know more about the purpose of Consumer Rights:

https://brainly.com/question/27317480

#SPJ11

The seller could purposefully or inadvertently send me products that I did not order, so the danger factor is considerable. Also financially, the business would suffer tremendous losses if I was forced to pay for each ship bearing that name. I must ensure that the contract we carry out contains information about that specific ship, such as its registration number.

Contract could have been drafted as-

"The buyer will fork up five hundred thousand dollars for the consignment of goods that are expected in New York on the MV Liberty the following year. When the shipment occurs, the seller will disclose information about the items, such as their weight, dimensions, product outline, delivery date, transport name, corporate shipping business, anticipated arrival date, etc. Payment will only be made if the purchased and accepted goods are identical to the buyer's satisfaction."

Here is the complete question -

You are the buyer of a large quantity of ball bearings. You sign a contract drafted by the seller that states you will "pay $500,000 for shipment for agreed goods arriving to New York next year on ship MV Liberty." Afterward you realize that "Liberty" is a common name in shipping and are concerned that a risk exists that you will be forced to pay for different goods that arrive on a ship with a similar name. Evaluate this risk and articulate ways that the contract could have been drafted to prevent such problems.

Learn more on  contract -

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ1

Well first you would need to know if the vet has any records of the dogs blood. Then you would also need to know if the they kidnapping victims doctor had samples of the victims blood. Then you would cross test the samples if the doctors had them to look for a match. !!! I AM NOT AN EXPERT THIS IS JUST WHAT I WOULD CONCLUDE !!!

Answer: Precipitin test

Explanation:

Answer:

The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.

Establish Justice is the first of five objectives outlined in the 52-word paragraph that the Framers drafted in six weeks during the hot Philadelphia summer of 1787. They found a way to agree on the following basic principles:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Explanation:

mark me as brainliest thank you

The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.

The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.

The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.

To know more about University of California here

https://brainly.com/question/16551247

#SPJ1

The command for creating a revised draft is called "revising."

Revising is the process of improving the content, organization, and style of a document. It involves re-reading, editing, and making changes to ensure that your writing communicates effectively and clearly. To make a revised draft, start by reading through your work and taking notes about what needs to be revised. Once you have an idea of what needs to be changed, make any necessary edits, rearrange sentences, add/remove details, and make sure the tone of your writing is appropriate. Finally, make sure you proofread your document to ensure it is free of any spelling or grammar errors.

Know more about draft here:

https://brainly.com/question/29443724

#SPJ11    

Answer:

Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples

Answer:

Explanation:

The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.

Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.

Answer:indictment

Explanation: The formal charge issued by a grand jury stating that there is enough evidence that the defendant committed the crime to justify having a trial; it is used primarily for felonies.

The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.

The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Learn more about jurisdictions

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ4

The  legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.

Conservatism in the United States is seen as a form of a political and social philosophy that is known to be based on traditionalism as well as republicanism, and hindered by the federal governmental power in association to U.S. states.

Note that The  legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.

Learn more about Supreme Court  from

https://brainly.com/question/15111973

#SPJ1

The vicarious responsibility is based on (D)  Respondeat superior.

Vicarious responsibility refers to a legal doctrine that holds one party responsible for the actions or omissions of another party. It is based on the principle of "Respondeat superior," which means "let the master answer" in Latin. This doctrine is primarily applied in the context of employer-employee relationships, where an employer may be held liable for the actions of their employees performed within the scope of their employment.

Respondeat's superior holds that employers are vicariously responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts committed by their employees while carrying out their job duties. This means that if an employee causes harm or damage to someone else due to their actions or negligence during the course of their employment, the employer can be held legally accountable for the employee's actions.

The concept of respondeat superior is based on the idea that employers have a degree of control and authority over their employees, and therefore, they should bear the responsibility for any harm caused by their employees' actions within the scope of their employment.

In contrast, the other options are not directly related to the concept of vicarious responsibility:

A. Proximate cause refers to the legal concept that establishes a close connection between the defendant's actions and the resulting harm.

B. Consent decree is a legal agreement reached between parties to resolve a dispute without admission of guilt or liability.

C. Duty of care refers to the legal obligation to act in a manner that avoids causing harm to others.

Therefore, the correct answer for vicarious responsibility is (D) Respondeat superior, as it specifically relates to the liability of employers for the actions of their employees. Therefore, the correct option is D.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Which of the following is vicarious responsibility based on? Select one.

Question 9 options:

A. Proximate cause

B. Consent decree

C. Duty of care

D. Respondeat superior

Know more about Respondeat superior here:

https://brainly.com/question/32243532

#SPJ8

In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the protection of freedom of the press and the unconstitutionality of prior restraint.

The Court held that the government could not censor or prohibit a publication in advance, except in very limited and specific circumstances. This decision reinforced the First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of the press, emphasizing the importance of these liberties in a democratic society.The Court held that the government cannot prevent publication or dissemination of material unless it poses a clear and present danger to national security.In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press. The Court held that a Minnesota law that allowed for the prior restraint of publication of newspapers was unconstitutional. Prior restraint is the government's censorship of speech before it is published or spoken. The Court found that the Minnesota law violated the First Amendment because it allowed the government to censor speech based on its content, rather than on its impact on public safety.

The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a landmark ruling that helped to establish the principle that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press from government censorship. The decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving freedom of speech, and it remains an important precedent today.

The specific language of the Supreme Court's statement in Near v. Minnesota is as follows:

   The general principle that the First Amendment precludes the existence of any prior restraint upon publication cannot be doubted.

The Court went on to explain that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press because it is essential to a free and democratic society. The Court stated that "the press was to be free from previous restraints because it is essential to the role of the press to serve as a check on government power."

The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a major victory for freedom of the press, and it helped to ensure that the First Amendment would continue to protect the right of the press to publish without government censorship.

To learn more about Supreme Court  visit: https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ11

The way the Fifth Amendment affects the case is B. It says that the government can take the land but must pay a fair price to the owners.

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S Constitution incorporates the Takings Clause, which states that private property should not be taken for open utilize without fair remuneration.

This implies that on the off chance that the government serious to procure private property, such as the homes in this case, for open utilize like building a travel station, they have the specialist to do so but must give reasonable stipend to the property proprietors. The reasonable recompense is ordinarily decided by evaluating the showcase esteem of the property.

Find out more on the Fifth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/20869899

#SPJ1

The correct option is a. Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses a copyrighted work without the permission of the copyright owner.

In this case, Kay and Leo are using MP3 music files without the permission of Natural Recording Company, which owns the copyrights to those songs. This is a violation of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner, and can result in legal liability for the infringers.

Fair use is a legal defense that allows certain limited uses of copyrighted works without the permission of the copyright owner. It is a complex and fact-specific doctrine that is applied on a case-by-case basis, and does not apply in this situation. Licensing is the process of obtaining permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright owner. While it is possible that Natural Recording Company may offer licenses for the use of its songs, this is not relevant to the question of whether Kay and Leo's copying of the songs without permission is a violation of copyright law.

Learn more about  Copyright infringement

https://brainly.com/question/16774161

#SPJ4

Answer:

during takeoff and landing, and while en route.

Explanation:

Safety belts are required to be properly secured around all occupants of an aircraft during takeoff, landing, and turbulent conditions. This includes both passengers and crew members.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations mandate that passengers must be briefed on the use of safety belts prior to takeoff and landing. The briefing should include instructions on how to properly fasten and unfasten the belt, as well as the importance of keeping it securely fastened during the entire flight.

In addition to safety belts, some aircraft may also be equipped with shoulder harnesses or other restraint systems. These may be required for certain types of aircraft or for certain phases of flight, such as during takeoff and landing. The specific requirements for safety restraints will vary depending on the type of aircraft and the applicable regulations. However, the primary goal of all safety restraint systems is to keep occupants safe and secure during the flight.

To know more about safety belts  click here

brainly.com/question/28985216

#SPJ11

Answer:

Their punishment should be ten to twenty-five years in prison with chance of parole because of the circumstances they were in.

A will that specifies an executor or an exception has a significant risk of being declared invalid since the form is no longer lawful under the law. Option (d) is Correct.

The person in charge of running the operations of a decedent's probate estate is known as the executor (for men) or executrix (for women). The chosen word is the same as the personal representative. It can be a smart idea to name a family member as executor if you believe they can handle the responsibility. Examples include naming a grandchild who is an adult, a niece or nephew, or one of your offspring.

A woman who has been charged with carrying out a final will and testament's instructions is known as an executrix. Both an executrix and an executor are accountable for the same things. The executor's primary responsibility is to follow out the deceased's instructions for managing their affairs and wishes. If there was no prior appointment, the executor is chosen either by the testator—the person who creates the will—or by the court.

Learn more about law visit: brainly.com/question/22967374

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity and may not reflect the provisions of current law?

A. marital share

B. statutory

C. formal

D. exemption trust

E. living

Northerners were angry because they still believed that the Missouri Compromise's establishment of a boundary between free and slave territory had resolved the conflict.

To maintain the country's balance between slave & free states, this law simultaneously accepted Hampshire as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was likewise prohibited.

The Missouri Compromise exacerbated the segregation between Northern & Southern states, rendering it useless in addressing the issue of slavery. Congress did not resolve the question of slavery in the new territories; instead, it heightened hostility between the North and the South.

Learn more about Missouri at

https://brainly.com/question/18367808?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Answer:

Article 14 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.

Answer:

article 14

Explanation:

It is not possible to get exactly what you want from the political process," is the most accurate statement regarding the 2016 elections.  Therefore the correct option (e)

Politics is a complex and dynamic process involving multiple perspectives, interests, and competing priorities. It is rare for any individual or group to achieve all of their desired outcomes in the political arena. The political process often requires compromise, negotiation, and the balancing of various interests.

Thus, it is unlikely that any individual or group will be able to obtain everything they want from the political process. option (E)

Learn more about political process

https://brainly.com/question/14481116

#SPJ11

Answer:

American horror story’s cast so hot because they are celebrities and famous people. Like if you are the director, you wouldn't hire someone unattractive. This answer goes to any other movies/series .

Answer:

On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.

Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.

While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.

Answer:

The Supreme Court of the United States

Explanation:

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system, and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law.

Answer:

District Court

Explanation:

Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.

Explanation:

Answer:

gaily cort

Explanation:

guiiiiiiiifet6jnff