Answers
As part of its national security strategy, the US should cooperate with other nations to advance international trade.
What is international trading?The buying and selling of goods and services between businesses in several nations is referred to as international trade. On the global market, commodities such as consumer products, raw materials, food, and machinery are all purchased and sold.Through commerce, nations can access commodities and services that might not otherwise be accessible domestically and grow their markets. Market competition has increased as a result of global trade. This ultimately leads to more competitive pricing, which lowers the cost of the final product for the consumer.Global trade offers individuals and nations the chance to experience products and services that are either unavailable or more expensive domestically.Political economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo were among the first to acknowledge the significance of international trade.However, some contend that commerce with other countries can really be detrimental to smaller countries, placing them at a disadvantage on the global arena.To learn more about international trade https://brainly.com/question/15115779
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the military intelligence strategies with their descriptions.
information engagement
command and control warfare
operations security
military deception
an integrated strategy of physical attacks, electronic warfare, and
computer network operations against an opponent's control station
>
all activities to mislead an adversary about military capabilities, plans,
strategies, and operations
preventing opponents from discovering critical Department of Defense
information
attempting to influence the opinion and attitudes of an opponent through
non-lethal means
Answers
Explanation:
right option according to me b d c a
E
According to the video, which abilities do Lawyers need? Select all that apply.
ability to lift heavy objects
ability to interpret complex legal documents
ability to travel frequently
ability to perform research
ability to prevent crimes
Answers
Answer:
Ability to interpret complex legal documents, and ability to perform research
Explanation:
Sometimes its also ability to travel frequently, but i think it depends on what kind of lawyer you are
Answer:
its b and d
Explanation:
edg.2021
A crime has been committed on a popular college campus. Police have suspicions about who committed the crime, but a professor named William H. Sheldon offers his services. He explains to detectives that by looking at their suspects, he will almost certainly identify the culprit. Which suspect would Sheldon MOST likely pinpoint for the crime?
19-year-old Jacob, who stands 5 ft 4 inches, weighs 120 lbs., and plays chess
18-year-old John, a tall, muscular football player who weighs in at 170 lbs.
20-year-old Leo, chubby at 5 ft 10 inches and 235 lbs., who works in the commissary
21-year-old Austin, chemistry major who is 5 ft 10 inches and weighs about 160 lbs.
Answers
Answer:
18-year-old John, a tall, muscular football player who weighs in at 170 lbs would be the suspect where Sheldon MOST likely pinpoint for the crime.
What was the Supreme Court decision to stop the removal of Native Americans in the Indian Removal Act?
Answers
The Supreme Court decision to stop the removal of Native Americans in the Indian Removal Act was Worcester v. Georgia.
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was an act passed by the United States Congress under President Andrew Jackson's administration that authorized the forced expulsion of Native American communities from their ancestral homelands east of the Mississippi River to the western region of the continent. The act was a manifestation of the federal government's determination to acquire land for white settlers.
The Supreme Court decision to stop the removal of Native Americans in the Indian Removal Act was Worcester v. Georgia. Worcester v. Georgia was a Supreme Court ruling issued in 1832 in which the court affirmed that indigenous tribes were distinct political communities and that the state of Georgia could not enact laws to regulate the conduct of Native Americans in their territories. As a result, the Supreme Court's decision rendered the Indian Removal Act's expulsion of Native Americans illegal.
For more about Worcester v. Georgia:
https://brainly.com/question/30432964
#SPJ11
Gregory, a resident of Idabel, has been bombarded with emails from a local real estate licensee. He keeps opting out of receiving the emails, but they just keep coming. What federal law is the licensee possibly violating
Answers
Idabel resident Gregory receives a flood of emails from local real estate licensees. He keeps refusing to receive emails, but he keeps getting them. The federal law , the licensee possibly violating the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.
The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a federal law that protects consumers from unsolicited e-mail solicitations.
Therefore, if Gregory continues to receive emails from you, you are in violation of our efforts to protect Gregory from spam.
This law was enacted in 2003. It established the first US national standard for sending commercial email to anyone. So it is important.
To learn more about ‘Federal law’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.
plz mark as brainliest
Ok I swear the censor thing is annoying. I just wanna gib som points to my hommies ya feel me?
Answers
Sometimes I feel that the bot hates me
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
Which of the following is a reason that a person can receive a diagnosis of drug abuse?
A. Using more than the recommended amount of a drug
B. Using more than one kind of drug at a time
C. Using a drug at a time it is physically dangerous to do so
D. Using a drug during daylight hours
Answers
Answer:
A, Using more than the recommended amount of a drug.
I hope this helped at all.Answer:
A OPTION IS THE ANSWER
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
Can someone help me with the top one real quick not understanding or what to put down for it
Answers
Answer: First case is a civil case.
Second case is criminal case.
Explanation:
First case is a civil case because it is caused due to the negligence of the gym management who did not conduct a check on instruments used in the gym. Also, if a particular person is not involved in criminal conduct then the case will be considered as civil case resulting in the injury of the students.
Second case as the car was under the supervision of the auto repair shop so the car should not receive damage during tire repair. This is showing the negligence of the auto repair shop and if a person is involved in dishonestly damaging the car should be penalized.
Identity theft may
lower credit interest
reduce credit balances
affect the credit score
cancel debt-to-credit ratio
Answers
Create a pamphlet explaining the guidelines you would suggest for federal financing of presidential campaigns.
Explain how presidential campaigns are publicly funded
Explain the advantages and disadvantages of federal financing.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Presidential campaigns are publicly funded because candidates raise funds from the public for their campaigns. There are limits on how much each individual can contribute but there are also ways to get around those limits; such as contributions by Political Action Committees (PACs).
Federal financing will allow candidates to compete on equal financial backing. It also avoids PACs' influences on candidates. The disadvantages include the federal government has to provide the financing with money that can be used elsewhere. It also gives the same financial backing to candidates with little chance to win.
Presidential campaigns are publicly funded because candidates raise funds from the public for their campaigns.
How presidential campaigns are funded and what are the pros and cons of federal financing?Presidential campaigns are funded to raise funds from the public for their campaigns. There are limits on how much each individual can contribute but there are also ways to get around those limits; such as contributions by Political Action Committees (PACS). A publicly-funded election is an election funded with money collected through income tax donations or taxes as opposed to private or corporate-funded campaigns. It is a policy initially instituted after Nixon for candidates to opt into publicly funded presidential campaigns via optional donations from tax returns.
The pros of federal financing are it will allow candidates to compete on equal financial backing. It also avoids PACs' influences on candidates. The cons or disadvantages include the federal government has to provide the financing with money that can be used elsewhere.
It also gives the same financial backing to candidates with little chance to win.
Learn more about campaigns, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15992670
#SPJ2
A taxpayer who failed to claim the depreciation deduction for the last 12 years may correct this by ?
Answers
If a person fails to claim depreciation, the most important consequence is that he lose the greatest tax benefit.
If a person has claimed incorrect amount of depreciation he can do the catchup adjustment, in order to correct the improper depreciation in the previous years.
Even if, the taxpayer has failed to claim depreciation entirely, he can do the following:
1) File an amended return.
2) The taxpayer can increase the basis of the property by the amount of depreciation that should have been claimed.
3) He/she can file form 3155 to change the accounting policy.
4) In the current year, he can file form 4562 to include the unclaimed depreciation in this year.
To know more about depreciation: https://brainly.com/question/28588335
Sonya previously worked at Firm A. While she was there, Firm A worked on the Fisher v. Baker case, representing Fisher. Sonya obtained confidential information about the case while at Firm A. Sonya has now moved to Firm B, which represents Baker in the same case. Fisher does not want Sonya or anyone else at Firm B working on the case.
May Sonya's colleagues at Firm B continue to work on Fisher v. Baker?
A. Yes, if they screen Sonya from the case, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher
B. No, they must withdraw from the case
A. Yes, if they screen Sonya from the case, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher
If a lawyer who is disqualified from representing a client joins a new firm, the new firm may be disqualified as well unless the lawyer is properly screened. Proper screening means the disqualified lawyer doesn't work on the case, discuss it with those who do, or have access to case files. It also requires that the disqualified lawyer doesn't share fees from the matter, and the former client is given notice (along with periodic certifications of compliance with the screening procedures). Alternatively, the former client can give informed consent, confirmed in writing, but here Fisher has refused to give consent.
Answers
Based on the provided information, Firm B can continue to work on Fisher v Baker as proper screening of Sonya, apportion no part of the fee to Sonya, and give notice and updates to Fisher. (Option A)
According to the practice of ethical screening in law, if a lawyer who is disqualified from representing a client joins a new firm, the new firm may be disqualified as well unless the lawyer is properly screened. Ethical screens refer to a system of safeguards and procedures that law firms employ in an attempt to prevent the imputation of a conflict of interest from one or more lawyers or nonlawyers to the rest of the law firm. Hence, proper screening implies that disqualified lawyers refrain from working on the specific case, do not discuss it with those who do, and do not have any access to case files. Furthermore, the disqualified lawyer does not receive a share of the fees from the matter, and the former client is given notice. Alternatively, the former client can give informed consent, confirmed in writing, but in the given case Fisher has refused to give consent.
Learn more about Conflict of interest:
https://brainly.com/question/21648646
#SPJ4
removing existing barriers when readily achievable in public buildings, such as adding braille markings to elevator buttons, is a requirement of which law?
Answers
A limited use/limited application elevator, or LULA, is smaller and moves more slowly than a typical passenger elevator found in a large commercial structure.
According to Meihls, LULAs are made for limited capacity and normally only carry passengers up one or two storeys. Churches, schools, libraries, and small businesses frequently have them.In order to increase accessibility in already-existing structures, LULAs can also be installed. In order to be in compliance with the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (the most recent revision), your building must be altered, renovated, or expanded to remove "accessibility barriers in existing places of public accommodation when doing so is readily achievable."
learn more about LULA here:
https://brainly.com/question/17144835
#SPJ4
What type of contract is created with a dvd of the month club
Answers
Answer:
Generic Contract.
Explanation:
The DVD-of-the-month club is a club that assists the club membership by sending them untapped stock of the independent film sectors. The club members are able to take benefit of watching films, even before they are available for the general public.
The type of contract that is created with the DVD-of-the-month club is generic contract. Generic contract can be defined as agreement forms, which is filled by both the parties, agreeing on terms and conditions of the contract to take the procedure further.
Therefore, generic contract is the contract answer.
in the case of in re winship, the supreme court held that delinquency must be established:
a. Beyond a reasonable doubt.
b. To the court's satisfaction.
c. By a preponderance of the evidence.
d. By clear and convincing evidence.
Answers
In the case of In re-Winship, the Supreme Court held that delinquency must be established beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case of In re Winship was a significant Supreme Court case decided in 1970 that addressed the standard of proof required in juvenile delinquency cases. The case involved a 12-year-old boy charged with stealing money from a woman's purse. The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the guilt of a juvenile must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, similar to the standard used in criminal cases involving adults. This decision marked a departure from the previous practice of using a lesser standard of proof, such as the preponderance of evidence. The ruling aimed to safeguard the rights of juveniles and ensure fairness in the juvenile justice system.
To know more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ4
What difference does Geoghegan draw between the case he observes in the German labor court versus the case he had recently tried in Chicago
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Geographer and author Tim Geoghegan, in his book "Which Side Are You On?: Trying to Be for Labor When It's Flat on Its Back," distinguishes a labour case he observed in a German labour court and a case he had recently tried in Chicago.
In the German case, Geoghegan notes that the labour court seemed to be more focused on protecting the dignity of the workers involved in the case, rather than simply following the letter of the law. He observed that the judge seemed to take the time to listen to the workers and to understand their perspective and that there was a greater sense of respect for the workers as individuals. This, in turn, led to a more equitable and just outcome for the workers.
In contrast, Geoghegan's experience in the Chicago case was characterized by a more adversarial and impersonal approach. He notes that the judge in the case was more concerned with following the strict legal procedures and rules, rather than considering the broader context of the workers' situation. As a result, the workers in the case received a less favourable outcome.
Overall, Geoghegan's observations suggest that the approach of labour courts can vary greatly depending on the cultural and legal context in which they operate. While some courts may prioritize the dignity and well-being of workers, others may be more focused on following the letter of the law.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Geoghegan draws a difference between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago in terms of the approach to resolving the conflict.
In the German labor court, Geoghegan notes that the judge's primary focus was on finding a compromise that would benefit both parties and preserve the employment relationship. The judge's decision was based on a nuanced understanding of the industry and the needs of both the employer and employee.
In contrast, in the case he tried in Chicago, Geoghegan describes a more adversarial approach where the judge was focused on applying the letter of the law and making a definitive ruling. The decision did not take into account the nuances of the industry or the potential impact on the employee's future job prospects.
Overall, Geoghegan suggests that the German approach may be more effective in resolving labor disputes because it prioritizes maintaining the employment relationship and finding a mutually beneficial solution. The difference that Geoghegan draws between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago is the approach towards resolving labor disputes and the level of worker protection.
There is a more collaborative and balanced approach to resolving disputes between workers and employers. The legal system focuses on providing fair and just outcomes for both parties, ensuring that workers are protected and their rights are upheld.
To Know more about balanced approach
https://brainly.com/question/15097510
#SPJ11
An officer should begin taking notes
when witnesses have been identified.
when arriving at the crime scene.
as soon as a photographer arrives.
after the crime scene has been investigated.
Answers
Why should the u.s give a $15 minimum wage?
I need a why it should be standpoint pls :)
Answers
With the prices of everything continuing to rise (gas prices, food prices, automobile prices, etc), people are needing a higher salary to pay for these things and avoid going homeless / bankrupt. With a 15$ minimum wage, it can help millions of people pay for these things and care for their families.
Without this 15$ minimum wage, the amount of homeless people / bankrupt people will jump dramatically.
What kinds of control are available legislatures? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answers
Answer:
1. Financial authority: Legislators have the authority to approve budgets and allocate funding to various programs and initiatives.
2. Legislative authority: Legislators have the authority to create and pass laws that govern numerous parts of society.
3. Oversight control: Legislators can investigate and oversee government agencies to ensure they are operating properly.
4. Appointment control: Legislators have the authority to confirm or reject appointments made by the executive branch.
5. Impeachment control: Through the impeachment process, legislatures can remove public officials from office.
All of these checks and balances are necessary for the legislature to keep the government working properly and citizens' rights safeguarded.
If a taxpayer's 2020 household income of $60,000 places the taxpayer at 350% of the federal poverty level, what is the taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the PPACA to purchase a qualified health plan?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is $5,700.
Explanation:
With an income of $ 60,000, the tax payer is at 350% of the Federal Poverty Level or FPL, so the normal expected contribution is 9.5% of his income.
The normal expected contribution = 9.5% of his income
= 60000*9.5%
= $5,700
Therefore, The taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the ppaca to purchase a qualified health plan is $5,700.
There are nearly 100 district courts, a dozen circuit courts, and one Supreme Court in the United States.
true
false
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
There are 41 district courts which is nowhere near 100. There's 13 circuit courts so that was 1 number off. Lastly there is only one Supreme Court so the last one is correct but overall the statement is false.
Explain the process of empowerment and delegation in criminal justice organizations. Include the role of trust related to delegation and empowerment.
Answers
The process of empowerment and delegation in criminal justice organizations will be from top to bottom or we can say it is from superior to subordinate.
What is delegation?Delegation refers to the shift of authority as well as power from superior to subordinate. Delegation is giving another person the authority to perform a particular activity. It is the process of distributing and delegating work to others and is therefore one of the central concepts of business management.Delegation is the transfer of responsibility for a particular task from one person to another. From a management perspective, delegation occurs when managers assign specific tasks to employees.Hire someone to direct your subordinates and tell them exactly what to do to organize surveys, collect feedback and report back to you so you can make informed decisions.
Thus, by delegating power, authority, and responsibility one can easily empower the criminal justice organizations as one superior is not burdened with all the work instead it is distributed and transferred to every subordinate.
To know more about delegation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27823193
#SPJ10
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Question 5 of 10
what are two broad categories of tort remedies?
a. damages and writs
b. temporary and permanent injunctions
c. damages and compensation
d. damages and injunctions
Answers
Damages and compensation are two broad categories of tort remedies. Damages are granted for bodily harm, whereas compensation is on a higher level. Compensation seeks to put the injured party in the same situation as if the injury had not occurred by providing monetary compensation for the harm done.
While 'damages' categories refers to compensation awarded or sought, 'damage' refers to the hurt or loss for which compensation is claimed or awarded. 'Damage' can relate to monetary or non-monetary compensation , whereas 'damages' refer to monetary recompense. Payment or reward for work or services provided, or for injury incurred, is referred to as compensation.
To learn more about categories, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8866495
#SPJ4
In 2009 one person died every blank minutes from impaired driving in the United States
Answers
Answer:
Every 48 minutes
Explanation:
Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
Part I
A. A plaintiff is suing for damages resulting from a fall in the supermarket.
Which court should the plaintiff file in?
B. A trial judge did not supply a Russian-speaking defendant in a theft case
with an interpreter and the defendant is convicted. To which court should
the defendant appeal?
C. A defendant is charged with kidnapping a child and taking the child to five
different states. Where would the case be heard?
I
D. Several of the federal circuit courts of appeal are in disagreement over
whether a campaign finance reform law violates the First Amendment. What
is the only court that could decide to hear the case?
Answers
Answer:
Tenemos que el condenado es la persona que va a la cárcel debido la realización de diferentes delitos.
El imputado o acusado es una persona que se le acusa de diferentes delitos pero que todavía no ha sido demostrada la veracidad de esta acusación.
Cuando a un imputado se le demuestra frente a un juicio que es responsable de diferentes delitos se le aplica una condena y por ende pasa a ser un condenado.
dame corazon y 5 estrellas todo lo que miran
Explanation:
Make a list of 1-3 modifications to law enforcement hiring that you'd make to make the community safer.
Answers
Answer:
1. ENSURE EVERY COP IS A RECRUITER
2.SELECT THE BEST RECRUITMENT OFFICER
3. MAINTAIN COMMUNICATION WITH APPLICANTS DURING THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS
Explanation: