What is something easy to see but hard to look at?

The methods, modes, and forms that authors and speakers employ to expertly emphasize, embellish, or improve their compositions are referred to as literary terms.

The usage of literary phrases has value. They are critical in a variety of ways, in fact. Writing and speaking about trends, politics, and even society at large are made possible by literary terminology. Moreover, rhetoric can be employed to support claims and persuade audiences to accept other viewpoints.

What does literary theory mean?

Any concepts that can be used in many interpretive contexts that are generated from internal literary text analysis or from outside information are referred to be literary theory.

1. ridicule: makes a subject appear to be silly

2. parody: mimics a subject directly

3. reversal: changes circumstances suddenly

4. satire: exposes human weakness

5. exaggeration: makes something seem too good or too bad

To know more about the Literary term visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16416690

#SPJ1

Answer:

If+subject+simple past,would,should,could,etc+infinitive verb

conditional type 3

If+subject+past perfect+have+past perticiple

conditional type 2 (imaginary condition)

If +subject+simple present,simple future

conditional type 1 (open condition)

Explanation:

i hope it will help you

Answer: i agree

Explanation:     It CAN apply to life. Practice is never perfect,  and perfect practice doesnt always make Perfect. EXAMPLE; Albert Einstein, he was a bad kid in his school grades, but yet, he became the Most smartest man in the world. It took him a million tries to do (figure out) his work, it wasnt exactly perfect besides all the practice, but he managed. So yes, it can apply to life in some way, hope this helps.

Answer:

Yes I agree with this quote because you cant just automatically be perfect at something you have to practice, and practice leads to doing better and better at it.

In the story, racism is at the heart of the problem, idea that complicates the conflict is Neto has a difficult time convincing the team of Jesse's claims. Thus, option "B" is correct.

Neto, Jess and their teammates are tired of how Latino and Spanish athletes are being mistreated and devalued. They believe that this kind of prejudice will never change and that it damages their future as athletes. For this reason, they decide to leave the team, as a form of protest.

However, the coach does not support this decision and claims that leaving the team will only worsen their image within the sport and the audience. This lack of support further complicates the conflict they are involved in.

Thus, option "B" is correct.

To learn more about  It's Our World, Too!: Young People Who Are Making a Difference  click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4717249

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

edge 2022

The symphonic choir sang five songs at the concert.| The symphonic choir | sang | five songs | at the concert

In this sentence, the simple predicate is "sang." There is no direct object, but "five songs" is the indirect object, indicating to whom or for whom the action was performed.A predicate is the part of a sentence, or a clause, that tells what the subject is doing or what the subject is.Let's take the same sentence from before: “The cat is sleeping in the sun.” The clause sleeping in the sun is the predicate; it's dictating what the cat is doing.A simple predicate is the main verb or verb phrase of a sentence. This means that the simple predicate will almost always be just one or two words.

To know more about predicate visit
https://brainly.com/question/1761265
#SPJ11

The task at hand is to identify the cause and effect in each of the five given sentences. To begin with, the cause is the reason or action that leads to a certain effect, which is the outcome or consequence of the cause.

The first sentence states that the effect is the speaker's friend being mad at him, while the cause is his failure to bring his own art materials. The second sentence presents the effect of canceling the appointment, which is caused by the heavy rain. In the third sentence, the cause is the insult that the speaker received, leading to the effect of him leaving the room immediately.

In the fourth sentence, the cause is the extreme pollution of the river, leading to the effect of its death. Finally, the fifth sentence presents the cause as Anna's ability to complete her work before the deadline, leading to the effect of her promotion. It is important to understand the cause-and-effect relationship as it helps in identifying the root of a problem or the reason for a certain outcome. By analyzing the cause and effect, one can make informed decisions and take necessary actions to prevent negative outcomes or to promote positive ones.

It is a crucial element in critical thinking and problem-solving, as it helps in identifying patterns and making connections between events. Therefore, it is essential to develop this skill to become a better thinker and decision-maker in both personal and professional aspects of life.

Know more about Problem-solving here:

https://brainly.com/question/23945932

#SPJ11

The literary device used in the given sentence is a rhetorical question.

In order to make a point, to emphasize a certain notion, or to get the listener to reflect on a particular subject, rhetorical questions are ones that are not posed in order to elicit an answer.

In order to indicate astonishment and amazement towards the individual being addressed for not disclosing their capacity to have children with their spouse, as gods would, the speaker employs a rhetorical inquiry in this line.

The speaker is highlighting the unexpected and surprising character of the circumstance rather than seeking an explanation by posing the questions "Is this not the truth?" and "Why did you not tell us?"

The rhetorical inquiry works well to highlight the speaker's skepticism and to highlight the unexpected revelation regarding the addressee's purported godlike abilities.

To know more about rhetorical questions,

https://brainly.com/question/30930286

#SPJ1

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Answer:

You may get into your car one day and think, my car smells. Once you notice a smell the next thought is how to I get rid of the smell. There are many different things that can cause nasty smells. You may notice your car smells of gas, the car smells of rotten eggs, or of something else.

Explanation:

Answer:

a few girls, including Jan is the subject     have ice skates is the predicate

Explanation:

I did the assignment

The complete subject of the following sentence is a few girls, and the complete predicate is having ice skates.

A sentence is a communicative expression in philologies and grammar, as in the English language example "The swift brown fox jumps over the slow dog." It is often described in established grammar as a group of words that conveys a full impression, or as a unit made up of a subject and verb phrase.

A sentence fragmentise is a set of words that appears to be a complete sentence but isn't. Typically, sentence fragments lack a subject or content word or do not fully articulate a construct. A clear contextual matter of a sentence part is given below, owing to the rain.

Therefore, The correct option 1. (A) 2 (C) is correct.

Learn more about sentence here:

https://brainly.com/question/18728726

#SPJ2

Answer:

C. The lone gunslinger with a mysterious past.

Explanation:

In Western stories, lone gunfighters are rather prevalent. This persona is typically an excellent marksman with a troubled past and a penchant for solitude. They are nomads, rarely staying in one spot for more than a short while at a time. An outsider who doesn't look for trouble but is always ready to defend himself and others when it happens. 

The lone gunslinger, the babysitter with a hidden ability, and the accountant who is secretly a wonderful artist are all instances of archetypes. There are different types of archetypes.

Montag receives an earphone from Faber that enables them to communicate with one another. Montag can hear Faber giving him directions while wearing the headset.

This is crucial because Montag is concerned that Beatty will try to persuade him to put down the books and his education.Montag needed to be made aware of the significant function that firefighters play in their community, and Captain Beatty wanted to subtly caution him against bringing literature home.

This is the fundamental justification for Captain Beatty’s visit to Montag. The Captain can infer with accuracy that Montag is having second thoughts about his position and the decision to burn books when Montag fails to show up for work. Therefore, Captain Beatty wants to go see him to remind him of the important role that firefighters play in society.He also wants to caution him against bringing books home.

To know more about Montag visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9975851

#SPJ4

Answer:

sorry don't know good luck answering

Answer:

d

Explanation:

proper adjective is the letter of the term that identifies each underlined word: Jeremy found the filmstrip rather dull and boring. Hence, option D is correct.

A 35 mm positive film roll that has been spooled is what is known as a filmstrip, and it features 30 to 50 sequential images. Similar to 16 mm film, a filmstrip was positioned in front of the projector aperture—vertically as opposed to horizontally as with a slide projector.

A film strip, usually made of transparent plastic film, is essentially the "hardcopy results" of your film photography. When a photograph is taken, the areas that are darkest appear lightest, and vice versa, resulting in what are frequently referred to as "negatives."

The filmstrip, which was loaded into a projector, was essentially a roll of 35 mm film with a number of images on it. Teachers were able to screen-project one image at a time because to this.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about filmstrip, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28297753

#SPJ2

Answer:

It actually is universal

Explanation:

It is universal because at some time in our life at least once we had to be considered an outsider. Whether that may be a friend group that you weren't welcome in, or a sports team that you were considered one of the worst on. You were being considered an outsider at that moment. Everybody has to at least of experienced this once in their life.

-Hope this helped

(D) I was late for my appointment, so I accidentally ran a red light.

The fallacy that describes the situation is tu quoque.

Tu quoque is a fallacy that occurs when someone deflects an allegation or criticism by claiming the same thing or another transgression of the accuser. Tu quoque, Latin for "you also," is also known as the "you too" fallacy. It is a kind of ad hominem fallacy that is sometimes known as "two wrongs make a right."

In the question, the weightlifting coach, despite his conviction about the hazards of steroids, was exposed to have taken steroid pills on a daily basis at a younger age. As a result, the weightlifting coach's credibility is questioned by the person who heard about it. This is a case of the tu quoque fallacy, which is the "you also" fallacy. Therefore, the correct option is you, too (tu quoque).

You can learn more about fallacy at: brainly.com/question/14669739

#SPJ4

Answer:

✔️Understanding social cues

Explanation:

Actually, the question is:

What skill must she improve to be a more effective presenter?

So, the skill she must improve to be a more effective presenter is "understanding social cues".

Social cues are known as signals that are verbal or non-verbal and are expressed through motion, body, voice, etc. It influences our impressions and responses to others.

Some examples of social cues are vocal tone, eye gaze, etc.

Since Martinique frequently interrupts others, she needs to understand social cues in order to help her use it to send signals to people.

Without social cues, there is bound to be misunderstanding of people and situations.

Answer:

A: Understanding social cues

Explanation:

Answer:

it is opposite

Explanation:

e. g consume/fill

PLEASE MARK AS BRAINIEST

Robert Schumann's Dichterliebe is a song cycle comprising sixteen songs that collectively tell a story. Here all options are correct.

A. It is a song cycle: Yes, Robert Schumann's Dichterliebe is indeed a song cycle. A song cycle is a collection of songs that are interconnected thematically or musically and intended to be performed as a cohesive work. Dichterliebe consists of sixteen individual songs that together form a unified narrative.

B. There is a clear story being told: While Dichterliebe does not follow a traditional linear narrative, it does tell a story through the progression of the songs. It explores themes of love, longing, and heartbreak, capturing the emotional journey of the protagonist, often associated with Schumann himself.

The songs convey a range of moods and experiences, from the initial stages of infatuation to the depths of despair, ultimately culminating in resignation and acceptance.

C. The poems follow a psychological progression: Yes, the poems in Dichterliebe, written by Heinrich Heine, follow a psychological progression. They delve into the inner thoughts and emotions of the protagonist, reflecting his changing states of mind and the complexities of his love.

The poems explore themes of joy, hope, disillusionment, and despair, mirroring the protagonist's psychological and emotional journey.

D. It is comprised of sixteen songs: Correct, Dichterliebe consists of sixteen individual songs. Each song is relatively short, allowing for a concise and poignant expression of the emotions and themes explored throughout the cycle. The brevity of the songs contributes to the overall unity and coherence of the work. Therefore all options are correct.

To learn more about the song cycle

https://brainly.com/question/1325103

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The facts come first and then supposedly what could happen comes after. Hope I could help!

Answer:

I think the answer for Part B is C.

Explanation:

hope this helps :) let me know if I'm correct

Answer:

so the answer is C

Explanation:

Part B Which evidence from the passage best supports the answer in Part A?

Question 3 options:

"Provident was the first hospital in the United States in which black and white doctors worked together to care for all patients, regardless of race."

"Williams was confident that he could help. But then he saw the wound—it went deep into the chest, perhaps into the heart."

"Dr. Williams was called in. The doctor reassured the patient with his calm, dignified manner."

"Daniel Hale Williams was not foolish—on the contrary, he was very careful."

1992 was a hard year for the Queen and the Royal Family. The events that impacted the crown during this year were the divorce of Anne and Mark and the burning of Windsor Castle. The correct options are a and c.

The royal family is the family of the British crown. The queen of Britain was Queen Elizabeth and after his death in 2022, the new king is Charles III. The royal family lives in Britain, and they have castles in many places.

In 1992, many incidents happened that were very sad and depressing. The Windsor Castle burned and the daughter of the queen got divorced.

Therefore, the correct options are

a. The divorce of Anne and Mark.

c. The burning of Windsor Castle.

To learn more about the royal family, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/14187931

#SPJ1

Answer:

Suman arranged a taxi for us, didn't he?

Hope it helps :)

Answer:

the answer would be b

Explanation:

the question states what reveals her frustration, which is her mother being very disappointed in her

Based on the provided information, here is the matching of the works to the authors or descriptions:

The Prairie - James Fenimore Cooper

The Power of Sympathy - William Hill Brown

The Marble Fawn - Nathaniel Hawthorne

The Red Badge of Courage - Stephen Crane

For Whom the Bell Tolls - Ernest Hemingway

A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court - Mark Twain

Charlotte Temple - Susanna Rowson

Samuel Clemens - Mark Twain

Pilgrim's Progress - John Bunyan

The Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck

Yoknapatawpha County - William Faulkner

Allegory - a literary device, not associated with a specific work or author.

Read more on literature here https://brainly.com/question/20848481

#SPJ1

A reverse brief is a strategic communication tool used in legal settings, particularly in appellate courts, to present arguments in a concise and persuasive manner. Unlike a traditional brief, where the petitioner or appellant presents their arguments first, a reverse brief allows the respondent or appellee to present their arguments first.

One real-life example of a reverse brief can be seen in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in 2015. In this case, the reverse brief was filed by the respondents, who were advocating for the recognition of same-sex marriage. The purpose of their reverse brief was to respond to the arguments put forward by the petitioners, who opposed same-sex marriage.

The execution of the reverse brief in Obergefell v. Hodges involved presenting legal arguments and supporting evidence to counter the petitioner's claims. The respondents argued that denying same-sex couples the right to marry violated the principles of equal protection and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. They also presented social and scientific evidence to support their position that allowing same-sex marriage would not harm society or traditional marriage.

The purpose of the reverse brief in this case was to persuade the court that denying same-sex couples the right to marry was unconstitutional and discriminatory. By presenting their arguments first, the respondents aimed to frame the legal and social issues in a way that supported their position and rebutted the petitioner's arguments.

Citation:

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).

Learn more about Appellant

https://brainly.com/question/29766399

#SPJ11