Answer:
A poison pill is a defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage hostile takeover attempts. Poison pills allow existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.A poison pill is a defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage hostile takeover attempts. Poison pills allow existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.
how many credit can you earn per year from social security?
Answer:
four credits
Explanation:
Since 1978, you earn up to a maximum of four credits per year.
Yelling fire in a theatre when there is no fire presents which of the following?
A.
Warning
B.
Dilemma
Clear and present danger
OD. Fighting word
In a civil case, the object is to a. resolve a dispute to the satisfaction of all concerned parties. b. obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party. c. punish a wrongdoer to deter others from similar actions. d. take coercive action against a violating party.
In a civil case, the object is to obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party.
The Civil CaseCivil cases involve those conflicts cases between people or businesses.
These court cases deal with finances or damage to individual rights.
A civil case begins when an individual or business reasons to have been hurt by another person or company.
The civil cases are between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Thus option B is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the Civil Case" here:
brainly.com/question/1065754
- A court that does not typically hear original trials, but
whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is
likely to be a(n):
a)Trial Court
b)Civil Court
c) Intermediate Appellate Cour
C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court
An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.
To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here
https://brainly.com/question/33718034
#SPJ11
Applying the job characteristics Model, how motivating are Uber’s jobs for drivers?
Uber's jobs for drivers can be moderately motivating based on the Job Characteristics Model. Factors like skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback contribute to the overall motivation level, although individual experiences may vary.
Applying the Job Characteristics Model (JCM) to Uber's jobs for drivers, the motivation level can vary for different individuals. The JCM proposes that motivation is influenced by five core job characteristics: skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback. Uber's jobs for drivers generally exhibit some degree of skill variety as drivers perform various tasks like navigation and customer service. Task identity may be moderate, as drivers have a clear role in transporting passengers. Task significance can also be meaningful, as drivers contribute to the transportation needs of individuals. Autonomy is relatively high, as drivers have flexibility in choosing their working hours and locations. Feedback can vary depending on passenger ratings and reviews.Overall, Uber's jobs for drivers can provide a moderate level of motivation, with autonomy being a key factor. However, individual drivers' experiences and perceptions may influence the degree of motivation they derive from the job.
For more questions on Job Characteristics Model:
https://brainly.com/question/17228938
#SPJ8
What are some specific criminal justice policies that can be analyzed based on the death of George Floyd?
Answer:
George Floyd's death occurred on May 25, 2020, when Derek Chauvin - a white police officer - arrested Floyd and knelt on his neck for approximately 9 minutes and 30 seconds after he was handcuffed and lay face down on the floor.
The incident was filmed by several attendees who asked Chauvin to remove his knee from Floyd's neck. Likewise, the police officers were wearing body cameras, which also recorded the entire interaction with Floyd. Although the footage from operated body cameras was eventually also released, this did not happen until months after the incident itself and the publication of the private video footage. The day after the arrest - after several eyewitnesses had released their video footage of the incident - all four police officers were fired. Two autopsy reports subsequently found that Floyd had been killed, although the conclusions of the two reports as to the cause of death are not conclusive.
The incident, including in particular various video recordings, created a great deal of attention worldwide. In the United States, the incident led to large-scale demonstrations organized by Black Lives Matter around various American cities. Several of the demonstrations in the United States were accompanied by various forms of swelling, violence, street fighting and other forms of crime. President Donald Trump in several cases ended up approving the deployment of extra police officers to reduce the violence that ensued following the demonstrations. The case was a wake-up call to American society regarding institutional racism, especially in police agencies, as well as a sign of their brutality.
How did the supreme court’s ruling in the trans-missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power?.
Answer: The Joined together States Incomparable Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust degree that precluded anticompetitive behavior in commerce) connected to the railroad industry, indeed although the U.S. Congress had sanctioned a comprehensive administration of controls for that industry.
Explanation:
This case allowed searches, also known as "pat-downs," during field interrogations.
a. Chimel v. California
b. Terry v. Ohio
c. United States v. Matlock
d. Abel v. United States
The case that allowed searches, also known as "pat-downs," during field interrogations is Terry v. Ohio. Therefore Option B.Terry v. Ohio would be the correct answer.
This landmark case established the concept of "stop and frisk," which allows police officers to stop and briefly detain individuals if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity. During this brief detention, officers may pat down the outer clothing of the individual for weapons if they have reason to believe the person may be armed and dangerous. The decision in Terry v. Ohio recognized the need for police officers to take proactive measures to prevent crime, while also balancing individual rights to privacy and protection from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Visit here to learn more about crime : https://brainly.com/question/8625101
#SPJ11
While using cruise control, _____.
A. you don't need to steer or brake
B. you still need to steer and brake
C. you don't need to pay attention to the road
D. you still need to press the accelerator to maintain speed
Answer:
you're answer is B you still need to steer and brake.
B) you still need to steer and brake
Explanation: Cruise control only maintains speed (you can take your foot off the accelerator), BUT you still need to maintain the rest.
What range would your bac be if you are under 21 and are convicted of driving after illegally consuming alcohol?.
If the individual is under the age of 21, a BAC of 0.01% or higher is required.
After being detained or arrested for DUI, the DMV may take disciplinary actions against your driving privilege. A separate action may be taken by the court for the identical offense. The DMV action only affects your driving privilege. The court's action could include a fine, jail time, a DL suspension, and the finalization of a DUI program.
When the court notifies DMV of a DUI conviction, DMV will take additional activity to suspend or withdraw your driving privilege.
To learn more about BAC: brainly.com/question/2231540
#SPJ4
can someone help me with this question please.
Assuming that each of the following pieces of evidence is admissible, including a reliably documented chain of custody, which would NOT be useful in determining the facts of the case?
A. A photograph of the crime scene
B. Matching DNA test from blood at the scene and a hair sample from a suspect
C. An eye witness who says she thought she recognized that someone at the scene looks like the accused
D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school
Answer: C
Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all
Bella is married to Milo. They live in Rose Cottage, a property worth £500,000, with their two young children. Milo is the sole director of Jake Ltd, a small company. Doodles Bank plc lends Jake Ltd £300,000, a debt that is secured by a mortgage over Rose Cottage, granted by both Bella and Milo. This mortgage is clearly valid and enforceable.
Jake Ltd falls into financial difficulties and it is clear that without fresh capital it will go into insolvent liquidation, in which case Doodles Bank will have the right to have Rose Cottage sold and the proceeds of sale applied to the discharge of Jake’s debt, leaving Milo and Bella with any surplus. Doodles is prepared to advance an additional £200,000 to Jake but only if further security is provided, either by extending the mortgage on Rose Cottage, or in some alternative form.
Bella is accustomed to leaving all business and financial matters to Milo, preferring to devote all her time to the children. When Milo tells her that she needs to sign some papers relating to “the bank and the business”, she accepts without asking any questions. Milo arranges for her to attend a meeting at the offices of Tweeny & Sons, Milo’s solicitors, who carefully explain the extension of the mortgage over Rose Cottage to her and asked her whether she is happy to sign. She says she is (although in truth she has not been listening) and signs. Tweeny provide a written statement to Doodles that Bella has been properly advised and that she signed, as far as they could tell, of her own free will.
Thus, the further security demanded by Doodles Bank is duly provided and the additional finance made available. Nevertheless, Jake Ltd goes into insolvent liquidation one year later and Doodles wishes to enforce its security.
Discuss whether enforcement of the further security can be prevented in light of the account of how that security came to be granted.
The validity of the further security granted by Bella on her family home to secure a debt owed by her husband's company could be challenged on the basis that she did not fully comprehend what she was signing, or that her consent was obtained through undue influence or misrepresentation.
The account suggests that Bella left all financial matters to her husband, and that she signed the papers without asking questions or understanding the implications.
However, the success of any challenge would depend on the specific facts of the case and applicable legal rules.
Read more about law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1696010
#SPJ1
what is law why do we need it
Answer:
According to Oxford learner's dictionary:
Law is the study of the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members
Explanation:
we need it because of following reason:
it maintains rules and regulation in the society.it maintains peace and balance .it creates equality without discrimination.it helps us to be disciplined and well mannered..\(\huge{\textbf{\textsf{{\color{skyblue}{An}}{\blue{sw}}{\red{er}}{\color{red}{:}}}}}\)
Law :-↦ Law (laws in plural) are the rules made by an organisation or government in order to ensure fair & equal treatment for all the people that come under it.
↦ We need laws for a variety of reasons, like :-
Traffic laws are needed so that there will be a fewer number of accidents.Crime laws are necessary to reduce the number of crimes that take place .& etc.ʰᵒᵖᵉ ⁱᵗ ʰᵉˡᵖˢ
꧁❣ ʀᴀɪɴʙᴏᴡˢᵃˡᵗ2²2² ࿐
true/false. growing concentration of economic power katznelson threatens democracy facilitates economic equality makes it easier for citizens to hold corporations accountable for their illegal behavior is the main reason for the increase in racism in the United States
The growing concentration of economic power threatens democracy.
A democracy is a system of governance in which the people have the power to make laws and elect representatives to implement them. Who is called "the people" and how power is distributed or delegated by the people has evolved over time and at different rates in different countries.
Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of speech, inclusion and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, the right to vote, not being arbitrarily deprived of the right by the State Life and liberty, and the rights of minorities, are often hallmarks of democracies.
To know more about Democracy here-
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
Peter, who is the owner of a Wagon R, publishes an advertisement on Ikman.lk for the sale of his vehicle quoting a price of LKR 3,500,000/=. John calls Peter and says that he agrees to buy the Wagon R for the quoted price by way of a “Crossed Cheque.” Peter replies John and says that he has no intention of selling the Wagon R even though he published an advertisement on Ikman.lk
Discuss the application of law of contracts relating to offer and acceptance as well as law relating to cheques.
Answer:
the principle of "express or implied contract" could be applied.
Explanation:
According to this principle, a contract can be legally binding even though no written statement was made by the offeror (in this case represented by Peter).
Based on this principle, Peter's act of publishing an advertisement on Ikman.lk can be regarded as an expression of sale. However, by virtue of ownership, Peter can thus decide not to sell his Wagon since no direct offer was made to John personally.
Jack feels he has been discriminated against by his employer, based on his national origin. After a particularly tense incident one day, Jack leaves work and goes to his attorney and asks the attorney to file suit against the employer for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Will the attorney do so
Answer:
The lawyer cannot file a lawsuit under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is still relevant today in the USA and was a milestone in the fight for civil rights in American society. Although it is extremely relevant, this law does not apply to the case that was shown in the question above.
This is because this law is related to the prohibition of racial segregation related to skin color and not nationality. In this case, a lawsuit that wishes to use this law as a basis must present a situation of segregation and racism against blacks and not against foreigners, as is the case with Jack.
A form of government where a king or queen is the sole leader of the country and holds almost all the power.
absolute monarchy
representative democracy
communism
oligarchy
Answer:
it's the 1st one absolute monarchy
charitable organizations are not included in the do not call list prohibitions established by the federal trade commission (ftc).
It is false that the charitable organizations are not included in the do not call list prohibitions established by the federal trade commission (ftc).
The Do Not Call List prohibitions established by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are designed to protect consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls. These rules prohibit most telemarketing calls to consumers who have registered their numbers on the Do Not Call List. While the Charitable organizations are one of the organizations that are exempt from the Do Not Call List prohibitions. The FTC also states that charitable organizations must provide a toll-free number that consumers can call to request that the organization not make any more calls to them.
To learn more about prohibit click here https://brainly.com/question/30516430
#SPJ1
What are the three characteristics of criminal law
Answer:
crime has at least three elements: a criminal act, also called actus reus; a criminal intent, also called mens rea; and concurrence of the two.
Which of the following are situations in which sexual abuse should be reported to law enforcement?
Answer: Any case where the crime is believed to have occurred
Explanation:
you didn't include the options but sexual abuse is a crime therefore it should always be reported.
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on.
Carly files a complaint against the delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on the corporation's registered agent.
A registered agent refers to an official who is designated to receive official papers for the business. In United States business law, specifically, these registered agents are designated to receive service of process (SOP) in times when the firm or entity is a party in any sort of legal action. These agents can be either an officer or employees of the firm or a third party.
A registered agent is entitled to receive service of process notices, government correspondence, and compliance-related documents on behalf of the firm. A registered agent is also known as a resident agent or statutory agent.
Learn more about registered agents:
brainly.com/question/13383140
#SPJ4
Who is on the Foreign Relations Committee?
Answer:
As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, the composition of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee can change over time, as it is dependent on the senators appointed by their respective parties. Therefore, I cannot provide you with an up-to-date list of members.
To find the current members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I recommend visiting the official website of the United States Senate or conducting a search on a trusted political news website. These sources will provide you with the most recent information on the committee's members, including the chairman, ranking member, and other senators serving on the committee.
Explanation:
what is the rule for the division fa-ta? why is it not fat-a?
The division rule for "fa-ta" rather than "fat-a" depends on the context of the word and the language rules it follows. In English, when dividing words into syllables, there are certain principles that guide the process, including vowel patterns, consonant clusters, and prefixes or suffixes.
One reason for dividing "fa-ta" instead of "fat-a" could be the presence of a vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) pattern, which suggests dividing the word between the two vowels, giving "fa-ta." Another possible reason is if "fa" is a prefix or "ta" is a suffix in the given context, making the division clearer as "fa-ta."
However, without specific context or information on the language rules followed by the word, it is challenging to definitively determine the exact reason for dividing it as "fa-ta" and not "fat-a."
To know more about language, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10585737#
#SPJ11
in this case, the court determined it had personal jurisdiction. did the court also have jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries?
Answer:
Explanation:
It is not possible to answer this question without more specific information about the case in question.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to exercise power over a particular individual or entity, such as the defendant in a lawsuit. It is based on a variety of factors, such as the defendant's presence or contacts within the jurisdiction, and is distinct from jurisdiction over property.
Jurisdiction over property, also known as in rem jurisdiction, refers to a court's authority to adjudicate disputes over specific property, regardless of who owns or possesses that property. In rem jurisdiction can be based on a variety of factors, such as the location of the property or the source of a particular claim.
Whether or not the court in the case in question had jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries would depend on the specific facts of the case and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. Without further information, it is impossible to say whether the court had jurisdiction over property as well as over the individuals involved in the case.
Mark broke into Laura's home in the middle of the night intending to steal Laura's flat-screen television, laptop, and whatever money he could find. In the middle of the burglary, Laura, hearing some noises, woke up and grabbed her gun to protect herself. As she entered the hallway, she saw Mark, screamed, and then shot him. Laura then dropped the gun and ran out of her home to her neighbor's, where she called the police. When the police arrived, Mark had died. How is this incident likely to be reported under the uniform crime reports? If Laura lives in a state participating in the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), how differently would it be reported? Are there any other reporting mechanisms that will reflect this incident? What "costs" will Laura likely incur?
Answer:
She will not get in trouble because she was defending her self.
Explanation:
In a free market, who would pay for the delivery of health care services?.
Answer:
The patients.
Explanation:
weston manufacturing uses activity-based management to reduce or eliminate non-value-added activities from its value chain. the company's human resources department (hr) has an annual budget of of $3 million. of this amount, $1 million is assigned to the payroll processing cost pool. there are 3 activities associated with the payroll processing cost pool, and each is responsible for driving the following amounts of the pool's total cost: (1) 60% are driven by transaction activities; (2) 35% are driven by labor activities; and (3) 5% are driven by supply consumption activities. the hr department has an opportunity to purchase a new computer system costing $240,000. the only cost savings that would result relate to the payroll processing cost pool. specifically, the new system would reduce transaction activities by 8%, labor activities by 20%, and supply consumption activities by 4%. if the expected reduction in non-value-added costs is accurate, the company will recover the cost of the $240,000 investment in
The company will recover the cost of the $240,000 investment in total cost allocated $ 11 ,00,000 .
Evaluating:Total cost Travel Information processing Prof. Development
Hiring and recruiting 10,00,000 700000 120000 180000
Payroll 25,00,000 250000 1625000 625000
Employee benefits 15,00,000 150000 450000 900000
Total cost allocated 1100000 2195000
What exactly is an HR division?The HR (Human Resources) department is the group in charge of managing the employee life cycle—recruiting, hiring, onboarding, training, and terminating employees—as well as overseeing employee benefits.
What kind of division is HR?A company's division of human resources (HR) is in charge of finding, screening, recruiting, and training job applicants. Programs for employee benefits are also managed by HR. Compensation and benefits, as well as employee terminations, are handled by a human resources department.
Learn more about HR roles:
brainly.com/question/28171907
#SPJ1
c. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you defend someone you knew was guilty? Explain.
Answer: lawyers have a legal responsibility to their clients that they must uphold. This means if the lawyer knows the client is guilty, they must still defend them. That’s there job.
Explanation: The job of a criminal defense lawyer is to defend you against the charges that are presented, know matter what.
Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be
a. dismissed during a trial.
b. dismissed or settled before a trial
c. resolved only after a trial.
d. settled at a trial
In a typical legal case where Edie files a suit against Frank, it is likely that the case will be dismissed or settled before a trial takes place. Option B is correct.
This is because the majority of legal cases are resolved through settlements or dismissals rather than going to trial. Settlements occur when the parties involved negotiate an agreement to resolve the dispute without going to trial. Dismissals can happen for a variety of reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff.
Trials are usually seen as a last resort, as they can be time-consuming and expensive for all parties involved. Additionally, trials can be unpredictable, and the outcome is ultimately in the hands of a judge or jury. Overall, the legal system aims to resolve disputes in the most efficient and fair manner possible, and settling or dismissing a case before a trial is often the preferred method.
Option B holds true.
Learn more about legal cases: https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
Careful———-
is the BEST way to gather information needed to sell alcohol responsibly.
Coordination
Questioning
Observation
Communication
The BEST way to gather needed information to sell alcohol responsibly is through careful C. Observation.
What does it entail to sell alcohol responsibly?Communicate with the buyer and make observations to satisfy that the person demanding to buy alcohol is sober.
Alcoholism has been found to be a chronic disease that demands treatment at rehabilitation clinics and support groups, including Alcohol Anonymous.
However, the alcohol seller does not need to antagonize their customers when refusing to sell. But they can offer customers help when they ask. Diligence is required to avoid alcohol sale offenses.
In gathering information to sell alcohol responsibly, you do not require careful coordination, questioning, or communication but Option C.
Learn more about selling alcohol responsibly at https://brainly.com/question/4818130
#SPJ1