Answers
Related Questions
What factors help explain why the police solve so "few" crimes?
Answers
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation:
Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.
Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.
Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.
The plain view doctrine refers to the power of law enforcement to seize any contraband materials that are in plain view, even if the officers don't have a specific warrent for them. Consider the case when during a warrant house search, the law enforcement officers are looking for evidence of a digital crime involving credit card fraud. While in the house, they find no evidence of credit card fraud or any other crime that involves credit cards. While looking around they found various pirated movies and DVD duplication equipment. Can they seize this equipment and arrest the owners
Answers
Answer: Yes, they can seize the equipment and arrest the owners.
Explanation:
Under the plain view doctrine, the law enforcement officers may seize illegal contraband even without a warrant when it's observed in an officer's plain view. The officer must legally be allowed to be there, and the officer must have probable cause to believe that the seized objects relate to criminal activity.
In this scenario, while looking around the house,if they found various pirated movies and DVD duplication equipment, they can seize the equipment and arrest the owners. Piracy is theft. The officers found t pirated movies and DVD duplication equipment. Downloading a film or copying a movie without paying is a breach of copyright.
The case: Sixteen-year-old Terry was in a bedroom at his family's home with his younger brother when he pulled a handgun from underneath the mattress. Terry was allegedly pointing the gun at his brother when it fired. The bullet struck his brother, killing him. Terry had gotten the .380-caliber semi-automatic handgun by trading a 9mm Glock he had stolen from his father. The police say they believe the shooting was not intentional.
Answers
Answer: Involuntary Manslaughter
Explanation:
It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).
Elements of crime committed:
Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.
Match each statement with the correct item.
John Peter Zenger
Eighth Amendment
Susan B. Anthony
Fourteenth Amendment
Thomas Jefferson
civil liberties
Nineteenth Amendment
poll tax
bail
unreasonable searches and seizures
required states to grant all citizens “equal protection under the law”
guarantees women the right to vote
involved in a court case supporting freedom of the press
described the establishment clause as a “wall of separation between church and state”
security deposit to encourage attendance in court
a fee paid in order to vote
suffrage leader during the 1800s
prohibited by the Fourth Amendment
freedom to think and act without government interference
protects an accused person from excessive bail
Answers
Answer:
order
Explanation:
poll tax- a fee paid in order to vote.bail- security deposit to encourage attendance in court.civil liberties- freedom to think and act without government interference.19th amendment- woman right to vote. 14th amendment-"equal protection under law"?[not sure for 5] Susan b Anthony- feminist/suffrage leader.8th amendment-protects an accused person from excessive bail. john p zenger- involved a case involving freedom of press. 4th amendment- unreasonable searches and seizures. jefferson- wall of separation between church and statemary, who has developed a deep hatred of joe, disguises her voice and calls him one night claiming to be a nurse at a hospital in the city where joe's parents live and tells him that his parents have just been killed in a car accident. joe would be most likely to win a tort suit for:
Answers
In the given case, Joe would be most likely to win a tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress
In this situation, Joe might have a strong case for intentionally causing Mary emotional anguish. When someone's extreme and outrageous behavior causes serious emotional distress to another person, a tort claim known as the intentional imposition of emotional distress may be made. Instead of just being careless, the behaviour must be reckless or purposeful.
In this scenario, Mary deliberately covered her voice when she called Joe to inform him that his parents had passed away. It might be argued that this behaviour is harsh and obnoxious and that it is meant to cause Joe great emotional discomfort. Additionally, the case for deliberate infliction of emotional distress is strengthened by the fact that Mary has a strong dislike for Joe and called him, particularly because of this.
Read more about emotional distress on:
https://brainly.com/question/31183618
#SPJ4
George Kildearn is forty years old. He was born in Dublin, Ireland, but has lived in California the past fifteen years, ever since he married his wife, who is a native Californian. He wants to run for office. What do you recommend?
Answers
How do key character traits or expectations of government leaders differ among the branches?
Answers
Answer:
Powers are separated among different agencies or branches of government. Each agency ... LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION THROUGH ELECTIONS. ... C. TRAITS OF CIVIC CHARACTER.
new york's approval of the constitution was absolutely necessary because
Answers
Opponents of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in an attempt to prevent its passing, inserted a prohibition against______discrimination in employment, thinking that such discrimination was acceptable and that many others agreed with them.
Answers
Which strategy is most likely to result in the government passing a law preventing companies from engaging in unfair or offensive business practices?.
Answers
Through lobbying, the government may enact legislation that forbids businesses from using insulting or unfair commercial practices.
What are offensive business practices?Lobbying is the practice of trying to persuade a member of the legislature or a member of their staff to support a particular position through oral or written communication.
Any effort made by individuals or special interest groups to influence policy is known as lobbying.
Therefore, this might lead to ineffective policymaking because of improper influence, unfair competition, and policy capture.
Learn more about law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16594094
#SPJ1
After the jury began deliberations, the jurors drank several
bottles of wine. They then decided that to save time, they would
decide the case by flipping a coin. One juror accepted a bribe to
vote for one side and was upset because the coin toss went the
other way. Juror Randy was upset about the coin toss because
he had done a lot his own investigation of the scene. Tiffany
said that prosecutor told her that the defendant actually had
two prior convictions and that why he would not take the stand.
How many kinds of juror misconduct took place?
A) 5
B)3
C)4
D)6
Answers
Answer:
5
Explanation:
DrinkingFlipping coinBriberyOwn investigation on sceneTiffany prosecutor conversationCan i get brainliest?
Discuss how reserve officers could be a benefit to investigative work.
Answers
Answer:
Brainliest please
Explanation:
For police departments that decide to use reserve officers, the added help can condense full- time police officers but also pose arrears. The key is to minimize the pitfalls and duly manage the reserves.
State law extends the authority to use reserve officers to cosmopolises. All of theS.C. Criminal Justice Academy's Reserve Officer Program Norms must first be met.
A reserve police officer is an overdue levy who assists a law enforcement agency in administering the law. The agency head, with the blessing of the governing body or its principal operating officer, appoints reserve officers. Just like their full- time counterparts, reserve officers are concentrated on the weal of the people, the protection of property in their community, and the just and indifferent enforcement of the law.
Critical analyze the significance, jurisdiction and functions of Punjab Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and suggest ways and means by which that office may become instrumental to providing substantial justice to the common man.
Answers
Answer:
1) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees:
Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or inquire into any matters which:-
(a) are subjudice before a Court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him or
(b) relate to the external affairs of Pakistan or the relations or dealings of Pakistan with any foreign state or Government; or
(c) relate to, or are connected with, the defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan, or the matters covered by the laws relating to those forces.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matters relating to the Agency in which he is, or has been, working, in respect of any personal grievance relating to his service therein.
(3) For carrying out the objectives of this Act and, in particular for ascertaining the root causes of corrupt practices and injustice, the Ombudsman may arrange for studies to be made or research to be conducted and may recommend appropriate steps for their eradication.
Functions
The law empowers the Ombudsman Punjab to entertain complaints against any department, commission or office of the Provincial Government or a statutory corporation or other institution established or controlled by the Provincial Government but does not include the High Court and the Courts working under the supervision of High Court and Provincial Assembly and its Secretariat.
Under section 9(1) of the Act the Ombudsman on a complaint of any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly or on a motion of Supreme Court or the High Court or on his own motion (suo moto) can undertake any investigation into any allegation of ‘maladministration’ on the part of any agency or its officers or employees.
The Ombudsman, however, has no jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into matters which are (a) subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction (b) relates to the external relations of Pakistan or connected with defence of Pakistan or Military, Naval and Air Force of Pakistan or the matters covered by the laws relating to these Forces. The Ombudsman also cannot entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matter relating to the agency in which the public servant has been or is working in respect of any personal grievance or relating to his service therein.
Powers
Ombudsman has the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the code of civil procedure for summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person; compelling the production of documents; receiving evidence on affidavits and issuing commission for examination of witnesses. The Ombudsman is vested with the powers to enter and search any premises and inspect any article, books of account and other documents; impound and seal such article. The Ombudsman has the same powers, mutatis mutandis, as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.
What actions would you take as a police officer to insure good relations with the public in the area that you patrol?
Answers
Police officers can take actions such as fostering community engagement, promoting transparency, practicing respectful communication, and implementing community policing initiatives.
Building and maintaining positive relations with the public is crucial for police officers to effectively carry out their duties and ensure public safety. Here are some actions police officers can take to foster good relations with the community:
1. Community Engagement: Actively engage with community members through regular meetings, neighborhood events, and outreach programs. This allows officers to build trust, understand community concerns, and collaborate on problem-solving.
2. Transparency: Be transparent in actions and decision-making processes. Publicize policies and procedures to ensure transparency, hold regular public briefings, and provide clear information about law enforcement activities to foster trust and accountability.
3. Respectful Communication: Practice respectful and empathetic communication when interacting with community members. Actively listen to their concerns, treat individuals with dignity and respect, and ensure that the language used is clear and non-confrontational.
4. Training and Education: Provide ongoing training to officers on topics such as cultural diversity, de-escalation techniques, and implicit bias. This helps officers develop the necessary skills to understand and interact respectfully with individuals from different backgrounds.
5. Accountability and Complaint Procedures: Establish a fair and transparent process for handling complaints against officers. Investigate complaints promptly and hold officers accountable for any misconduct. Communicate the outcomes of investigations to the public to maintain trust and confidence.
6. Implement Community Policing: Embrace community policing strategies that involve officers working collaboratively with community members to identify and address local issues. This approach promotes problem-solving partnerships and enhances trust and cooperation.
7. Use of Technology: Utilize technology to enhance accountability and transparency. Body-worn cameras, dash cameras, and online complaint submission platforms can provide objective evidence and improve transparency in interactions between officers and the public.
By implementing these actions, police officers can establish and maintain positive relationships with the public they serve. Open and respectful communication, community engagement, transparency, and accountability are essential in building trust and fostering a safer and more cohesive community.
To learn more about communication click here: brainly.com/question/33019968
#SPJ11
How did budgeting shortages affect incarceration in the United States?
0. Reform groups sprang up throughout the United States calling for updated equipment.
0. Approval for prison privatization began to accelerate in many states.
Huge gaps arose in repairing the physical plants of prisons in the South compared to those in the North.
Wardens formed an organization to finance necessities.
Answers
Answer:
How much does the criminal justice system cost, and who pays for it? How well-funded are prisons and jails? What are the economic impacts and origins of mass incarceration? Do certain programs in prison affect people’s economic well-being after release? See the reports below to explore these questions and more.
Explanation:
100 points!!!!!!!!!! A student is trying to understand the differences between correctional officers and probation and parole officers. What are the key differences between the three? Are there any similarities?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
A correction officer is responsible for watching the individuals while they are in jail waiting for trial, after they have been convicted and are serving time for their offense. A parole office oversees the individual after they have been released and are required to be under supervision for a period of time
Probation is part and parcel of the offender's initial sentence, whereas parole comes much later, allowing the offender early release from a prison sentence. Probation is handed down by the judge at trial. It may be in lieu of jail time or in combination with some jail time.
Answer:
A correction officer is responsible for watching the individuals while they are in jail waiting for trial, after they have been convicted and are serving time for their offense. A parole office oversees the individual after they have been released and are required to be under supervision for a period of time
Probation is part and parcel of the offender's initial sentence, whereas parole comes much later, allowing the offender early release from a prison sentence. Probation is handed down by the judge at trial. It may be in lieu of jail time or in combination with some jail time.
Explanation:
According to Abraham Lincoln,what is meant by the term democracy?
Answers
Answer:
According to Abraham Lincoln,Democracy is a government of the people for the people and by the people.
when we say,of people it means it composed of the peoples of that society.
for the people means it do works to aid the peoples of that society.
Brainliest please.is Issuing driver's licenses to residents of Florida state or local federal
Answers
A defendant was tearing up a stretch of pavement with a jackhammer when a rock flew up and struck a plaintiff in the head, causing him to be hospitalized. Because the jackhammer manufacturer had been out of business for several years, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for his medical costs, lost work time, and pain and suffering solely against the defendant. At trial, the plaintiff's attorney calls a witness who testifies that, at the time of the incident, the defendant stated, "It was my fault." The defense attorney objects, but the judge overrules the objection on the ground that this is a declaration against interest.Are the grounds for the judge's decision correct?
Answers
Yes, the grounds for the judge's decision are correct.
A declaration against interest is a statement made by a party that is against their own interests, and is generally admissible as evidence in a court of law. In this case, the defendant's statement "It was my fault" is a declaration against their own interest, as it suggests that they are responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. As such, the statement is admissible as evidence, and the judge's decision to overrule the defence attorney's objection is correct.
To know more about judge's decision:
https://brainly.com/question/29553439
#SPJ11
What is the difference between specialized patient records and general health records?
Answers
1. Critically discuss the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in the UK. Your discussion should include a comparison with the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in ONE other country.
Marks are awarded for:
• Knowledge of methods of assessing seriousness of on-line child abuse, for example, the COPINE Index and Sentencing Advisory Panel scale.
• Knowledge of key legislation providing for on-line child abuse offences taking account of technological capabilities.
• Ability to critically compare effectiveness of methods for investigating and prosecuting on-line child abuse offences in the UK and ONE other country.
Answers
Answer:
I think abuse is bad
Explanation:
honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry
Why did businesses support the Pure Food and Drug Act?
a. They understood that they were liable if they harmed the health of consumers by selling spoiled products.
b. They wanted to protect their workers from spoiled foods.
c. They saw their own market share dwindle as superior European foods grew more popular.
d. They understood that greater public confidence in the quality of the products helped their sales.
e. They were concerned about the health and welfare of their workers.
Answers
Businesses support the Pure Food and Drug Act as they understood that greater public confidence in the quality of the products helped their sales. The correct option is d.
Businesses supported the Pure Food and Drug Act for several reasons, with the understanding that increased public confidence in the quality of their products would ultimately benefit their sales and reputation being a primary factor.
Here's a closer look at the reasons behind their support:
Reputation and consumer trust: Businesses recognized that maintaining a positive reputation for providing safe and high-quality products was essential for attracting and retaining customers. The Pure Food and Drug Act aimed to regulate and enforce standards for food and drug safety, which helped businesses demonstrate their commitment to consumer welfare and build trust.
Competitive advantage: By complying with the regulations imposed by the Pure Food and Drug Act, businesses could distinguish themselves from competitors who might not adhere to the same standards. This adherence could serve as a selling point, attracting customers who prioritized product safety and quality.
Market stability: The Act provided a level playing field by setting minimum standards for food and drug safety across the industry. This helped prevent unscrupulous businesses from gaining an unfair advantage by selling substandard or adulterated products. By promoting a more regulated marketplace, businesses could operate in an environment where consumer confidence was less likely to be undermined by unsafe or fraudulent products.
Long-term profitability: Businesses recognized that the Act's emphasis on consumer protection and safety would contribute to the long-term profitability of the industry. It helped prevent public health crises, litigation, and damage to brand reputation that could arise from selling harmful or mislabeled products. By investing in safer practices and supporting regulatory measures, businesses could safeguard their own interests and ensure sustained growth.
While concerns for worker welfare (option b) and market competition (option c) may have influenced some businesses' perspectives, the primary reason for their support of the Pure Food and Drug Act was the understanding that increased public confidence in the quality of their products would directly impact their sales and success.
Thus, the correct option is d.
To know more about Pure Food and Drug Act, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/16859490#
#SPJ11
Ethics describes the principles of right and wrong that can be used by individuals to make choices to guide their behaviour. Select one: a. True b. False.
Answers
Ethics describes the principles of right and wrong that can be used by individuals to make choices to guide their behaviour. This is True.
Ethics is a branch of philosophy that deals with moral principles and values. It provides a framework for individuals to make choices and guide their behavior based on principles of right and wrong.
By using ethical principles, individuals can make informed decisions that consider the potential impact on others, and act in a way that is fair, just, and respectful of others.
Learn more about Ethics, here
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ4
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answers
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
some states require mediation and/or arbitration for certain civil cases, while in other states alternative dispute resolution methods are voluntary. under the terms of a written contract, who chooses an arbitrator?
Answers
Under the terms of a written contract, the parties involved in the dispute generally choose an arbitrator.
This is because arbitration is a consensual process, and the parties involved have agreed to resolve their disputes through this method in lieu of going to court. The contract may specify a specific arbitrator or a method for selecting one, such as through a mutually agreed-upon list of arbitrators. The selection process for an arbitrator is often a key consideration in negotiating the terms of the contract, as the parties may want to ensure that the arbitrator is impartial and has relevant expertise in the subject matter of the dispute. Under the terms of a written contract, the parties involved in the dispute generally choose an arbitrator.
Learn more about arbitration :
https://brainly.com/question/24847253
#SPJ1
Answer: The American Arbitration Association
Explanation:
Terrorism is among the main concerns of any modern public security organization. Research some recent foiled acts of domestic terrorism and discuss the critical-thinking skills that the public security personnel displayed as they countered the attempts. Discuss what public security personnel can do to address the problem of terrorism while keeping in mind the Bill of Rights. Write your response in two or three paragraphs.
PLEASE HELP IN A HURRY!!!! 50 POINTS FOR WHO EVER GETS IT RIGHT!!!
Answers
What did the landmark ruling in the Miranda vs Arizona case determine?
Answers
Answer:
it detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Kansas passes a statutes which says all corn must be grown and processed in a certain manner so as to avoid harmful pesticides. This statute is challenged as being unconstitutional. What are the two factors for the court to consider when deciding whether the statute is constitutional?
Answers
Answer:
A statute can be considered unconstitutional when it goes against the norms or laws established in the constitution of each country; Now, according to the established laws or norms established in the Kansas Constitution, the Supreme Court must determine to what extent it is feasible to modify any statute or approve a new one in order to promote a friendly ecosystem that does not affect the environment.
Explanation:
Each country or nation is autonomous in terms of establishing laws, but in terms of the environment, the constitutions must tend to the care and protection of the environment; In this case, if Kansas presents evidence of the use and toxicity of the pesticides used in the processing of the corn crop and therefore a new statute must be implemented, the court must consider evaluating that statute as viable and appropriate, since it is for the either from consumers or citizens for the protection of soils, water and the environment.
What are the Warning Traffic Signs?
Answers
A warning sign is a particular kind of sign that alerts the viewer to a potential risk, impediment, or circumstance that calls for extra care.
A driver may not immediately notice some of the hazards that are indicated by traffic signs on the sides of the road. At the Turin Automobile Museum, there are primarily warning signs on display (along with some control signs like Do Not Enter). Shape and colours of the utilised road warning sign are: Uses Uses Uses Uses Uses, previously used has utilised in the past, utilises several, absent any data. The shapes of warning traffic signs can vary, but they typically have an equilateral triangle shape with a white background and a heavy red border. They have a yellow backdrop and a black border in the People's Republic of China (Macau and Hong Kong are the exceptions).
Learn more about Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/9368597
#SPJ4
Which scenario below best shows how state taxes support the economy?
Answers
Answer:
A special one year tax pays for building new schools.
A special one-year tax to help pay for building new schools would serve as an example of how local taxes support the economy. Public school funding is usually based on local taxes and therefore, this example is most likely exemplary of this.
Please mark as brainliest if answer is right
Have a great day, be safe and healthy
Thank u
XD