Answers
All citizens have the right to "change or to abolish it, and to form new Government" if their government violates their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
What does the Declaration of Independence's third quotation mean?Excerpt 3: In order to protect these rights, men created governments, which derive their legitimate authority from the agreement of the governed. E: Governments are established to guarantee the protection of people's rights. The people have the authority to make laws.
What passages from the Declaration of Independence are those?"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, among which are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers," the Declaration of Independence states.
To know more about unalienable rights, visit:
brainly.com/question/2864614
#SPJ4
Related Questions
kat tells gerry that she will mow his yard for the summer for $800. gerry thinks about it and drops a note in the mail to kat telling her that he rejects her offer. he thinks about it, however, and calls her to tell her that he accepts the offer before she receives his rejection. which of the following is true under the mailbox rule?
Answers
In this case, as per the exception of the mailbox rule stands and the offer is valid because the acceptance method was not specified. Therefore, the acceptance via call is valid.
The default rule in contract law for deciding when an offer is accepted states that an offer is deemed accepted when the acceptance is conveyed, also known as the mailbox rule or posting rule (whether by mail e-mail, etc). The acceptance may still be acceptable even if the offeror leaves open the choice of how the offer is accepted and the offeree chooses an arbitrary method. The acceptance, however, won't be subject to the mailbox rule and won't take effect until the offeror actually receives it. This rule does not apply if the acceptance letter has not been properly posted or if the letter's address has been incorrect.
To learn more about mailbox rule: https://brainly.com/question/15016404
#SPJ4
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answers
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.
What group in the United States is MOST likely to be stereotyped as involved with organized crime?
Russian Americans
Italian Americans
Albanian Americans
Irish Americans
Answers
Answer:
I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war
Explanation:
I may be wrong
Answer:
Italian Americans
Explanation:
sintaxis de ; Haz lo que te mandé
Answers
The lifetime likelihood bf imprisonment for white men is 1 in 23, while it is ___black men.O 1 in 2 O 1 in 5 O 1 in 4 O 1 in 3
Answers
The lifetime likelihood bf imprisonment for white men is 1 in 23, while it is 1 in 3 for black men. Therefore, the correct option is (d) 1 in 3.
The lifetime likelihood of imprisonment refers to the proportion of US residents who have ever served a state or federal prison sentence at any point in their lives, given the current rate of imprisonment, according to the Sentencing Project. Since 1980, imprisonment has risen dramatically, from fewer than 500,000 to more than 2.2 million people imprisoned today. The lifetime probability of imprisonment has risen correspondingly.Learn more about imprisonment: https://brainly.com/question/10190308
#SPJ11
People agree about how the government
should spend its money.
true or false ?
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Tons of people have different opinions and thats why we have different polictical parties.
Jeff calls the help desk about his new laptop. he is trying to connect to the company's wireless network. he can see the ssid and can enter the encryption key. after he enters the encryption key, he is booted off the network. what is the first thing you should check
Answers
The first thing to check is the correctness of the encryption key.
What is the first thing you should check when Jeff is unable to connect to the company's wireless network after entering the encryption key?The first thing to check in this scenario is whether the encryption key entered by Jeff is correct.
When connecting to a wireless network, the encryption key (also known as the Wi-Fi password or passphrase) is required to establish a secure connection
. If the encryption key entered by Jeff is incorrect, it will not match the security settings of the company's wireless network, resulting in a failed connection attempt.
To resolve the issue, the help desk should verify the correct encryption key for the company's wireless network. This can be done by checking the network's documentation, contacting the network administrator, or referring to any provided instructions or credentials.
By ensuring the accuracy of the encryption key, Jeff can establish a successful connection to the company's wireless network and avoid being booted off after entering the incorrect encryption key.
Learn more about encryption key.
brainly.com/question/11442782
#SPJ11
Each judge had his or her personal beliefs and philosophy, which shape the legal reasoning process.
a. true
b. false
Answers
The statement "Each judicial had his or her personal beliefs and philosophy, which shape the legal reasoning process" is true.
The legal reasoning process is shaped by each judge's personal beliefs and philosophy. A judge's beliefs and philosophies can influence how they interpret the law, determine the facts of the case, and reach a decision.It's critical to keep in mind that a judge's personal beliefs and philosophies should be kept separate from their professional responsibilities. Judges should base their decisions on the law and legal precedent, rather than their personal beliefs or biases. However, it's difficult to completely ignore one's personal views, and it's only natural for them to play a role in the decision-making process.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/20214003
#SPJ11
The Federal Protective Service (FPS) has noted that the contract (or private) security guards they hire are often ill equiped to monitor X-ray and metal detection equipment to detect firearms, which represent machines and tools they use every day. What do these FPS reports indicate for people in private security
Answers
These Federal Protective Service (FPS) reports indicate that people in private security require better training and equipment than they currently receive.
The private security guards will improve their protective security services with increased training on reading and monitoring X-ray and metal detection equipment.
According to available records, the Federal Protective Service is the uniformed security police division of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The FPS prevents, protects, responds to, and recovers from terrorism, criminal acts, and other hazards threatening the U.S. Government's critical infrastructure, services, and the people who provide or receive them.
Thus, the FPS provides essential protective services and reports to improve protective services.
Related link: https://brainly.com/question/18187050
1. John offers Tk. 5,000 to anyone who will remove
rubbish and clean his garden. The following people comply with the terms of
this offer:
(a) His wife, Gen;
(b) His ex-wife, Flora;
(c) His colleague, Sam
(d) His son, 9 years old, William;
(e) His next-door neighbor, Billy-a lunatic.
Advise John whether or not, in these circumstances, any legally
enforceable contracts have been concluded.
Answers
Answer:
In these circumstances, it is unlikely that legally enforceable contracts have been concluded with everyone who has complied with John's offer.
(a) John's wife Gen is considered a household member, and thus cannot enter into a contract with her husband.
(b) John's ex-wife Flora, however, can enter into a contract with John.
(c) John's colleague Sam can also enter into a contract with John as they have a professional relationship.
(d) John's son William is a minor, and as per the contract law, a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
(e) John's next-door neighbor Billy is a lunatic, and as per the contract law, a person of unsound mind cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
In conclusion, only John's ex-wife Flora and his colleague Sam have entered into legally enforceable contracts with John for the removal of rubbish and cleaning of his garden.
Life insurance companies often give applicants a physical examination to prevent.
Answers
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
Answers
suppose you purchase a new tablet computer. you bring it home and follow the instructions to make sure that it is fully charged, but it will not start up. which right protects your purchase
Answers
There are a lot of human rights. The right that protects your purchase is right to redress.
Who is entitled to have a redress? An individual can be entitled to redress when they are of 18 years or cannot manage his or her own affairs.In terms of business, Consumers also have the right to be compensated when they have cases such as misrepresentation, shoddy goods and unsatisfactory services. This helps to remove doubt and makes sure there is credibility of the producers and the goods being produced are of quality.
Learn more about right to redress from
https://brainly.com/question/3884093
Answer:
right to redress
Explanation:
lol
The ________ defense arises from a plaintiff's knowing and willing undertaking of an activity made dangerous by the negligence of another.
Answers
Moby, a resident of New Jersey, has an accident with Ogden, a resident of Illinois, while driving through that state. Ogden files a suit against Moby in Illinois. Moby files a Motion to Dismiss and refuses to come to Illinois. How will the Illinois Court get jurisdiction over Moby?
Answers
Answer:
A judge in Illinois will issue an arrest warrant against Moby to to extradite Moby to Illinois. That may not be legal. The judge will issue an illegal arrest warrant. But that really is how the real system works. I know this from first hand experience. I have gotten a number of illegal arrest warrants and I still haven't found a lawyer because that are participating cogs in the messed up system.
Explanation:
In contract law, intent is determined by the secret, subjective intent, or belief, of a party.False
Answers
T/F. the environmental protection agency can regulate a toxic substance that poses an imminent hazard but cannot prohibit its use altogether because of free market principles.
Answers
The statement " the environmental protection agency can regulate a toxic substance that poses an imminent hazard" is false because he Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to regulate and restrict the use of toxic substances.
Including the power to prohibit their use altogether if deemed necessary to protect public health and the environment. The EPA is responsible for enforcing various environmental laws and regulations in the United States, such as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Clean Air Act.
The EPA can identify toxic substances that pose an imminent hazard and take immediate action to mitigate the risks associated with their use.
This can include imposing restrictions, requiring labeling, setting standards for emissions or exposure limits, and even prohibiting the use of a substance if it is determined to be necessary to prevent harm to human health or the environment.
While free market principles are considered in the development of regulations, the EPA's primary mandate is to protect public health and the environment, and it has the authority to take actions to achieve that goal, including prohibiting the use of toxic substances if deemed necessary.
To know more about environmental protection agency, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13292139#
#SPJ11
What difference does Geoghegan draw between the case he observes in the German labor court versus the case he had recently tried in Chicago
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Geographer and author Tim Geoghegan, in his book "Which Side Are You On?: Trying to Be for Labor When It's Flat on Its Back," distinguishes a labour case he observed in a German labour court and a case he had recently tried in Chicago.
In the German case, Geoghegan notes that the labour court seemed to be more focused on protecting the dignity of the workers involved in the case, rather than simply following the letter of the law. He observed that the judge seemed to take the time to listen to the workers and to understand their perspective and that there was a greater sense of respect for the workers as individuals. This, in turn, led to a more equitable and just outcome for the workers.
In contrast, Geoghegan's experience in the Chicago case was characterized by a more adversarial and impersonal approach. He notes that the judge in the case was more concerned with following the strict legal procedures and rules, rather than considering the broader context of the workers' situation. As a result, the workers in the case received a less favourable outcome.
Overall, Geoghegan's observations suggest that the approach of labour courts can vary greatly depending on the cultural and legal context in which they operate. While some courts may prioritize the dignity and well-being of workers, others may be more focused on following the letter of the law.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Geoghegan draws a difference between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago in terms of the approach to resolving the conflict.
In the German labor court, Geoghegan notes that the judge's primary focus was on finding a compromise that would benefit both parties and preserve the employment relationship. The judge's decision was based on a nuanced understanding of the industry and the needs of both the employer and employee.
In contrast, in the case he tried in Chicago, Geoghegan describes a more adversarial approach where the judge was focused on applying the letter of the law and making a definitive ruling. The decision did not take into account the nuances of the industry or the potential impact on the employee's future job prospects.
Overall, Geoghegan suggests that the German approach may be more effective in resolving labor disputes because it prioritizes maintaining the employment relationship and finding a mutually beneficial solution. The difference that Geoghegan draws between the case he observes in the German labor court and the case he had recently tried in Chicago is the approach towards resolving labor disputes and the level of worker protection.
There is a more collaborative and balanced approach to resolving disputes between workers and employers. The legal system focuses on providing fair and just outcomes for both parties, ensuring that workers are protected and their rights are upheld.
To Know more about balanced approach
https://brainly.com/question/15097510
#SPJ11
megan agrees to sell nancy her rolex watch but they do not specify a price. in such a case, the court would not enforce the agreement because all of the essential terms are not present.
O TRUE
O FALSE
Answers
Statement megan agrees to sell nancy her rolex watch but they do not specify a price. in such a case, the court would not enforce the agreement because all of the essential terms are not present is TRUE.
In order for a contract to be legally enforceable, it must contain all of the essential terms, including the price or consideration for the goods or services being exchanged. In this case, since Megan and Nancy did not specify a price for the Rolex watch, the court would not be able to enforce the agreement as there is no clear understanding of the value of the item being sold. This principle applies to all types of contracts, as without the essential terms, it would be difficult for the court to determine the intent of the parties involved. Therefore, it is important to ensure that all essential terms are clearly stated in any contract or agreement to avoid any legal issues down the line.
To know more about enforce visit:
brainly.com/question/1306203
#SPJ11
A State Highway Law enacted by a state intended to regulate commerce and transportation on its highways that cross through and into the state, directly conflicts with the Federal National Highway Transportation Act. Which of the following describes the outcome of the State Highway Law. A. The Supremacy Clause holds that Federal Law is the supreme law of the land and when in conflict with state law, the Federal law preempts state law. B. None of the above. C. Pursuant to due process, Federal law cannot preempt state law. D. Pursuant to the Dormant Commerce Clause the federal law preempts the state law,
Answers
ANSWER:
A. The Supremacy Clause holds that Federal Law is the supreme law of the land and when in conflict with state law, the Federal law preempts state law.
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answers
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
Explain the difference between lethal force and non-lethal force for the tools in law
enforcement
Answers
thành viên hopej danh có thể là cá nhân hoặc tổ chức có tư cách pháp nhân là đúng hay sai
Answers
Thật. Một cá nhân hoặc tổ chức sở hữu các quyền pháp lý riêng biệt và riêng biệt, chẳng hạn như cá nhân, công ty hợp danh hoặc công ty. Một thực thể, trong số những thứ khác, có thể sở hữu tài sản, tham gia kinh doanh, ký kết hợp đồng, nộp thuế, khởi kiện và bị kiện
Are creating customers who are educated about their needs and all the available options for meeting those needs
Answers
Demand and supply are creating consumers who are educated about their needs and all the general options for fulfilling those needs
What is Demand and supply?Demand is the consumer's desire and willingness to purchase a product or service at a specific time or over time. Customers must also be able to pay for something they want or need based on their disposable income budget. Demand is defined as the amount of a commodity that a consumer is able and willing to purchase at each possible price over a given time period. The term supply refers to the amount of a specific product, item, commodity, or service that suppliers are willing to make available at a specific price. The amount of that product, item, commodity, or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at a given price is referred to as demand.To learn more about Demand and supply, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18320379
#SPJ9
Resolved: radicalism is preferable to incrementalism to achieve social justice.
what are arguments in favor of either side? specifically go over the disadvantages of radicalism.
note:
social justice is the procurement of equality so radical and incrementalism do not pertain to corporates for the most part as most articles tie them to.
Answers
The argument for radicalism is preferable to achieve social justice is that:
It is made up of a lot of pathways that interact and combine and bring about social justice.What is the argument for incrementalism as preferable to achieve social justice?Incremental change is one that makes effort to solve issues through the use of small, systematic steps that brings about or influence change over time.
Note that through the incremental method, governments can lower the risk and base their focus in working to make the system better instead of starting from the bottom and forming a new one.
The disadvantage of in radicalism is that it often begins from grassroots activism and most time it is always too spontaneous.
Learn more about radicalism from
https://brainly.com/question/8952483
#SPJ2
help if u can
200/200
yea yea yea
Answers
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is 1.
Explanation:
200/200
=1
The foundation and underlying principle of all securities regulation is disclosure. True or false
Answers
The statement "The foundation and underlying principle of all securities regulation is disclosure" is true. The main purpose of securities regulation is to ensure transparency, fairness, and integrity in financial markets by requiring companies to disclose important financial and non-financial information to investors. This allows investors to make informed decisions and helps prevent fraud and market manipulation.
Disclosure is the process of making facts or information known to the public. Proper disclosure by corporations is the act of making its customers, investors, and analysts aware of pertinent information.
Disclosure of evidence or Discovery, pre-trial phase in lawsuits where parties to the case obtain evidence. Convention of disclosure, convention that all material facts must be disclosed in financial statements.
To learn more about "Securities" visit: https://brainly.com/question/28070333
#SPJ11
1. Do you think an uprising can resolve a conflict in a country? Why or why not?
3. Do you think there is an on-going uprising in our society nowadays? Why or why not?
4. Create a slogan about the importance of "peace" in our country. Explain the message of the slogan.
5. If you are to amend Duterte's current Agrarian reform program, what would it be and why?
Answers
Uprisings may bring attention to grievances, but sustainable conflict resolution requires comprehensive dialogue and involvement of stakeholders.
Sustainable resolution of conflicts goes beyond the immediate demands of an uprising. It involves engaging in dialogue and negotiations to address the underlying issues causing the conflict. This process requires the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including government representatives, community leaders, and affected individuals.
By fostering understanding, empathy, and cooperation, conflicts can be resolved in a way that promotes long-term stability and addresses the root causes. Sustainable conflict resolution also takes into account social, economic, and political factors, ensuring that solutions are comprehensive and consider the needs and aspirations of all parties involved.
Dialogue and negotiation are essential components of conflict resolution. They allow conflicting parties to express their concerns, understand each other's perspectives, and work towards mutually acceptable solutions. Through dialogue, misunderstandings can be clarified, grievances can be addressed, and common ground can be found.
Negotiation, on the other hand, involves a process of give-and-take, where compromises are made to reach agreements that meet the interests of all parties. By engaging in dialogue and negotiation, conflicts can be de-escalated, tensions can be reduced, and sustainable peace can be achieved.
Learn more about Conflict resolution
brainly.com/question/12159116
#SPJ11
when we don't understand each other's language, language identity, and culture we view each other differently ?
Answers
Answer:
no
Explanation:
just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently
When we speak a different language or have a different culture, we seem 'alien' or foreign to those who do not follow the same as us. This makes us view each other differently as we do not have the knowledge to understand what the other person is doing, saying, or even implying.
It is true that language is an important factor in one's identity and belonging. It also determines who we are as a person, and reveals or is indicative of our origin.
Individuals are different, we all have our perspectives and priorities, and ideals. One's identity may be our language, our culture, the customs, what we eat or like. That does not mean that a person with a different language or culture or language identity is different and must be viewed differently. But most often than not, we tend to identify a person who speaks a different language or has a different culture as us as different. This is because it is human nature to associate and feel 'related' to those who speak the same language as ours. Having a point of similarity makes us comfortable, as everything can be understood by the other. So, when a person with a different language is present or has a different language identity and culture, we view them differently. Their language or culture, which is not similar to ours, makes them foreign, a new or another type.Language makes us feel a sense of connection, relatedness, etc.When we don't understand a person with a different language, or culture, or language identity, we tend to view them differently because of the feeling of being different, strange in some sort, or even completely unique to us. This 'difference' makes them as 'the other', another type, and being seen as separate or unrelated.
Learn more about language here:
brainly.com/question/19898392
Flexible time sentences could be completed in shorter amounts of time if
O an inmate paid additional fines
O an inmate showed good behavior and made improvements
O the victim of the criminal act spoke on the inmate's behalf
O a review board declared the prisoner innocent
Answers
Answer:
an inmate showed good behavior and made improvements
Explanation:
took the assignment