What are the three branches of government? 1. The legislative branch makes the laws. It is headed by congress. Congress includes the senate and the house of representatives. 2. The judicial branch is headed by the supreme court. It interprets the laws by analyzing the constitution, reviewing laws, and making decisions about states’ rights. 3. The executive branch enforces the laws. It is headed by the president of the united states. The executive branch is in charge of the military, communicates with other countries, and can veto a law.
Answers
Answer:
legislative, executive and judicial.
Explanation:
To ensure a separation of powers, the U.S. Federal Government is made up of three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. To ensure the government is effective and citizens' rights are protected, each branch has its own powers and responsibilities, including working with the other branches.
Related Questions
Why are the concurrent powers of the national and state governments necessary?
Answers
Answer:
Concurrent powers provide for the needs at each level of government in order to keep people safe, deter criminal activities, support the economy, and prevent and punish criminal behavior.
Which selection listed below is used when referring to a person born outside the US to parents who are US citizens and who is granted automatic US citizenship?
Answers
Answer:
don't know im sorry
Explanation:
(9) Write a short paragraph in your own words introducing Hinduism to someone who has never heard of it. You should include the words: way of life, Indus, Sanatan Dharma and Eternal Law.
Answers
Answer:
Hinduism is not only a religion but also a way of life.[note 1] Hinduism is widely practiced in South Asia mainly in India and Nepal. Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world,[note 2] and Hindus refer to it as Sanātana Dharma, "the eternal tradition," or the "eternal way," beyond human history.[4][5] Scholars regard Hinduism as a combination[6] of different Indian cultures and traditions,[7] with diverse roots.[8][note 3] Hinduism has no founder and origins of Hinduism is unknown.[9] What we now call Hinduism have roots in cave paintings that have been preserved from Mesolithic sites dating from c. 30,000 BCE in Bhimbetka, near present-day Bhopal, in the Vindhya Mountains in the Madhya Pradesh." There was no concept of religion in India and Hinduism was not a religion. Hinduism as a religion started to develop between 500 BCE and 300 CE,[10] after the Vedic period (1500 BCE to 500 BCE).[10][11] Hinduism contains a wide range of philosophies, and is linked by the concepts, like rituals, cosmology, Texts, and pilgrimage to sacred sites.
Explanation:
Review the debate between former presidents, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. In a three paragraph essay of (4-5
sentences each), write an evaluation with evidence to support which candidate proposed a more compelling argument about
inflation.
k
Support your claim with specific data presented by each of the candidates. Be sure to mention a minimum o
counterpoint, and refute this point with evidence.
Answers
The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
Essay structureIntroduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.
Learn more about what inflation is:
https://brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
Answer:
So when regan is debating against carter he says that inflation was at 4.8 percent, and now that it is 12.7 percent. Regan saids that carter hasn’t provided 8 million people that are unemployed, he say that carter wouldn’t use unemployment as a tool and makes it seem as he does. Carter said that he would provide people with more jobs, but there are more people that are unemployed. When carter does talk about providing jobs in the future, he barely has any evidence.
Explanation:
according to the viewpoint, a management problem should be handled according to the individual and the environmental situation. multiple choice question. classical contingency humanistic behavioral
Answers
Contingency.
What is contingency?
A contingency is the probable possibility of a bad event, such as a pandemic, economic downturn, natural disaster, fraud, or terrorist attack.
according to the viewpoint, a management problem should be handled according to the individual and the environmental situation is contingency.
A contingency is the probable possibility of a bad event, such as a pandemic, economic downturn, natural disaster, fraud, or terrorist attack.
To learn more about contingency checkout https://brainly.com/question/29039352
#SPJ4
Which statement about Toronto is true?
Question 3 options:
Toronto is the economic hub of Quebec Province.
Toronto's port ships food products from the Prairie Provinces nearby.
Toronto is Canada's largest metropolitan area.
Toronto has large oil and gas reserves.
Answers
What was John Marshall's final ruling in the Worcester V. Georgia case?
Cherokees were a
sovereign nation
and should have
federal protection
from state laws.
Double Jeop
Cherokees were
Georgia citizens and
should follow state
laws for taxes and
voting.
Streak Sover
Cherokees were a
sovereign nation but
should to be
relocated to
Oklahoma.
Cherokees were to
be sold into slavery
and their land would
be divided out
among Georgia
political leaders.
Answers
The Cherokee Nation, also, is a distinct community occupying its own home in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves, or in conformity with covenants and with the acts of Congress.
What was the verdict ?He contended that the act under which he'd been condemned violated the U.S. Constitution, which gives to the U.S. The Constitution also bars the countries from passing laws that alter the scores of contracts — in this case, covenants. Several covenants between the Cherokee and the U.S.. Indeed however Native Americans were now under the protection of the United States, he wrote that “ protection does not indicate the destruction of the defended. ”
To know more about Cherokee Nation visit:
brainly.com/question/21864209
#SPJ4
An individual’s fear of dogs that is lost as the individual is exposed to dogs in nonthreatening situations is referred to by behaviorists as a fear that has been: ________
a. satiated
b. suppressed
c. repressed
d. extinguished (extinction)
e. punished
Answers
An individual’s fear of dogs that is lost as the individual is exposed to dogs in nonthreatening situations is referred to by behaviorists as a fear that has been extinguished (extinction).
What makes fear so potent?A fundamental, strong, and pervasive human emotion is fear. According to psychological research, it involves both a significant individual emotional reaction and a general bodily response. Regardless of the nature of the threat, fear acts as a warning when danger is there.
What is the main cause of fear?All types of dread are primarily a result of the threat of harm, whether real or imagined. Our mental, emotional, or physical wellbeing could be in danger. While the majority of us have specific fears, we can learn to be afraid of nearly anything.
To learn more about fear visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28965775
#SPJ4
whether you succeed in persuasion often comes down to which of the following key questions? a. multiple choice are you sincere? b. are you likeable? c. are you trustworthy?
Answers
When it comes to persuasion, all three key questions - sincerity, likability, and trustworthiness - can play important roles. However, if I had to choose one key question that often determines whether you succeed in persuasion, it would be "Are you trustworthy?"
Trust is the foundation of any successful relationship, whether it's personal or professional. Without trust, it's difficult to establish credibility and create a connection with the person you're trying to persuade.
People are more likely to be persuaded by someone they trust, because they believe that person has their best interests at heart and is not trying to manipulate or deceive them.
To build trust, it's important to be transparent, honest, and reliable. This means being upfront about your intentions and motivations, keeping your promises, and being consistent in your behavior.
It's also important to listen actively to the other person's concerns and perspectives, and to show empathy and understanding.
Of course, likability and sincerity can also be important factors in persuasion.
Likability can help you establish rapport and create a positive impression, while sincerity can help you come across as authentic and genuine. But ultimately, if you want to succeed in persuasion, you need to be someone that people can trust.
To know more about persuasion refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1597628#
#SPJ11
which scenario might indicate a reportable insider threat
Answers
A coworker is seen using a personal electronic device in a place where their usage is restricted, which could signal a reportable insider threat.
Who should notify if any suspect an insider threat?If any person is not a government military member, employee, or contractor and accept that he needs to report an insider threat, then there should make a call to the local police or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
When a coworker is seen utilizing a personal electronic device in a restricted area, it could indicate a reportable insider threat.
Therefore, insider threat will use his authorised accession.
Learn more about the reportable insider, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14122419
#SPJ1
oup Assignment FOM Make a group(Minimum 4-Maximum 6) Choose any Multinational Identify their Long term and Short term goals Specify which goals are stated goals and which goals are real goals Also pro
Answers
Apple Inc. has both long-term and short-term goals. Their long-term goals include expanding into emerging markets, advancing their technological innovations, and fostering sustainable practices
Apple Inc. has stated long-term goals that reflect their commitment to sustainability, innovation, and market expansion. Firstly, they aim to penetrate emerging markets, such as India and China, to drive sales growth and increase their global market share. Secondly, Apple emphasizes technological advancements by investing in research and development to introduce cutting-edge products and services. Lastly, the company is dedicated to environmental sustainability, with goals to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources. These stated long-term goals align with Apple's public image and vision for the future.
In the short term, Apple sets specific goals to support their long-term objectives. They regularly introduce new product lines and upgrades to their existing devices, attracting customers and driving sales. By continuously improving their ecosystem, which includes devices, software, and services, Apple enhances customer loyalty and engagement. They also prioritize operational efficiency by streamlining processes, reducing costs, and optimizing resource allocation. These short-term goals contribute directly to achieving the company's long-term vision and objectives.
In conclusion, Apple Inc. has a combination of stated and real goals that guide their actions and strategies. Their long-term goals involve expanding into emerging markets, advancing technological innovations, and fostering sustainable practices. While these goals are publicly stated, their real long-term goals encompass maintaining market dominance, increasing profitability, and enhancing customer loyalty. In the short term, Apple focuses on launching new products, strengthening their ecosystem, and improving operational efficiency. By aligning their stated and real goals, Apple aims to sustain growth, remain competitive, and meet the expectations of their stakeholders.
To Learn more goals Here:
brainly.com/question/8305765
#SPJ11
of the following statements, which one best represents the role of the judicial branch of government?
The judicial branch tries government employees that are accused go committing a crime.
The judicial branch has the ability to declare a new law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch writes the bills that are then sent to the legislative branch
The judicial branch has a responsibility to ensure that the committee system functions properly
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
decides the constitutionality of federal laws and resolves other disputes about federal laws
Why do you think its important to exercise.
Answers
Answer:It helps lower risk of some diseases,it helps loose weight for those who are fat or obessed,it helps a person to age well,it is good for the muscles and bone and it helps the brain and the memory
Explanation:
What was a key difference between the Ottomans and the Safavids?
1.The Ottomans were Sunni, and the Safavids were Shia.
2.The Ottomans were Muslim, and the Safavids practiced Islam.
3.The Ottomans ruled in Asia, and the Safavids ruled in Asia and Africa.
4.The Ottomans fought over territory, and the Safavids were peaceful.
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Dr. Cashen studies how development is shaped by growing up in a LGBTQ parent family. Her work is most closely aligned with:
Answers
Dr. Cashen studies how development is shaped by growing up in a LGBTQ parent family. Her work is most closely aligned with developmental psychology.Dr. Cashen's studies that revolve around how development is influenced by growing up in a LGBTQ parent family are closely associated with developmental psychology.
Developmental psychology refers to the scientific study of how and why humans develop in the way they do throughout their lifespan.
Developmental psychology is concerned with investigating and describing a wide range of topics, including cognitive development, social development, language acquisition, motor skills, emotional development, and personality formation.
Developmental psychologists may focus on a variety of topics in their research. However, Dr. Cashen studies how development is shaped by growing up in a LGBTQ parent family.
As LGBTQ parent families become increasingly common, there is a growing need to understand how children raised in these families develop.
Dr. Cashen's research helps to address this need by exploring the effects of LGBTQ parenting on child development.
Dr. Cashen's research work, which focuses on studying how development is influenced by growing up in a LGBTQ parent family, is most closely related to developmental psychology.
Learn more about psychology visit:
brainly.com/question/31538247
#SPJ11
what factors caused the Great Depression of the 1930s?
Answers
Answer:
Among the suggested causes of the Great Depression are: the stock market crash of 1929; the collapse of world trade due to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff; government policies; bank failures and panics; and the collapse of the money supply.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Answer: The causes for the Great Depression
is that fact that the stock markets dropped drastically, loss of money, and disruption of trade. Mainly, the money supply decreased. This caused high unemployment and poverty.
Explanation:
PLEASE ILL GIVE BRAINLEST can you please list the steps a law has to go through to be passed as a law through state government NOT federal
Answers
Answer:
In the UK
Bills must be agreed by both Houses of Parliament and receive Royal Assent from the Queen before they can become Acts of Parliament which make our law. The Bill is introduced by a First Reading. ... If the Government has a majority, the Bill is then passed to the House of Lords.explain personal life or example from life compared to any of
one book-
Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are
High
OR
Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance,Book by Angela
Duck
Answers
"Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High" and "Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance" are both influential books that offer valuable insights for personal life. These books provide practical tools and perspectives to navigate challenging conversations and cultivate perseverance. Drawing parallels to personal experiences, individuals can apply the principles of crucial conversations to address sensitive issues effectively, while the concept of grit can inspire individuals to pursue their passions with resilience and determination.
In "Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High," the authors explore the importance of effective communication in challenging situations. This book teaches individuals how to engage in crucial conversations by fostering a safe environment, actively listening, and expressing their views assertively. Drawing from personal life, one can relate this to situations where important discussions with loved ones, colleagues, or friends arise. By applying the principles from the book, individuals can approach these conversations with empathy, maintain open dialogue, and ultimately reach mutually beneficial resolutions.
On the other hand, "Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance" by Angela Duckworth focuses on the role of grit, which refers to a combination of passion and perseverance, in achieving long-term goals. The book emphasizes the idea that talent alone is not enough for success; rather, it is the commitment to continuous effort and determination that leads to significant accomplishments. Relating this to personal life, individuals can reflect on their own experiences where they encountered obstacles or setbacks. By embracing the concept of grit, individuals can learn to stay resilient, maintain their enthusiasm, and persistently work towards their aspirations, even in the face of challenges.
Both books offer valuable insights that can be applied to personal life. "Crucial Conversations" equips individuals with effective communication skills to navigate difficult conversations, while "Grit" inspires individuals to pursue their passions with unwavering determination. By integrating the principles from these books into their personal experiences, individuals can enhance their ability to address crucial discussions and cultivate the resilience necessary for long-term success.
Learn more about organization here :
brainly.com/question/12825206?
#SPJ11
Which action from The Jungle Book best supports the claim that Baloo used the Law of the Jungle to save Mowgli? Baloo fights Shere Kahn at the Pack Council. Baloo speaks up for Mowgli at Council Rock. Baloo spends time eating honey and roots. Baloo hunts for food to feed Mowgli’s family.
Answers
Answer:
I put B im not sure its right but sorry if its not
Explanation:
Baloo speaks up for mowgli at Council Rock
Answer:
Sorry for late response but its B according to the person above.
B. Baloo speaks up for Mowgli at Council Rock.
if you select participants for your study based on the fact that they had a very low score on a test, the internal validity of your study is threatened by
Answers
To ensure internal validity in a study, researchers must carefully control for potential sources of bias. Selection bias is a particular type of bias that threatens the internal validity of a study.
When participants are chosen based on certain characteristics, such as having a very low score on a test, it can lead to selection bias because the sample may not be representative of the larger population.
Selection bias can be especially problematic in studies that rely on volunteer samples or convenience samples, as these participants may not be a true representation of the population being studied. This can limit the generalizability of the study's findings and undermine its internal validity.
To minimize selection bias, researchers must use random sampling methods to ensure that all members of the population have an equal chance of being included in the study. They can also use stratified sampling, in which they divide the population into subgroups based on certain characteristics and then randomly select participants from each subgroup.
This can help ensure that the sample is representative of the population and reduce the potential for bias.
To learn more about selection bias, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30355124
#SPJ11
Monica sets aside a few minutes every day to write in her journal. She finds a quiet place to write with minimal distractions so that she can stay in the moment. Monica writes about the things that are occurring in her life, articulating what she is experiencing and how she is feeling. At first, Monica found this activity to be hard, but she has gotten better at it over time, the more she writes, finding new words to label her feelings. Which facet of mindfulness best describes Monica’s actions?
A. Nonjudging of inner experience
B. Observing
C. Nonreactivity to inner experience
D. Describing
Answers
The facet of mindfulness that best describes Monica's actions is D. "Describing."
Monica sets aside time to write in her journal about the things happening in her life, articulating what she is experiencing and how she is feeling. This involves describing her inner experiences in detail and giving them a voice.
Additionally, Monica finds a quiet place to write with minimal distraction, which indicates a focus on being present in the moment and paying attention to her inner experiences without judgment or reactivity. However, the specific terms "minimal distraction," "nonjudging," and "nonreactivity" are not directly related to the facet of mindfulness that describes Monica's actions, which is D."Describing."
Monica's actions best represent the Describing facet of mindfulness. She sets aside time each day with minimal distractions to write in her journal, allowing her to focus on her thoughts and emotions. Through her writing, she articulates her experiences and feelings, which demonstrates the process of describing her inner experiences.
This practice helps her improve over time, finding new words to label her emotions. Although aspects of Nonjudging, Observing, and Nonreactivity may be present, Describing is the most prominent facet in this scenario.
learn more about mindfulness here
https://brainly.com/question/585640
#SPJ11
i cant see the answer that does not help me
Answers
Answer:
What answer are you looking for?
Explanation:
It contains a lot of matter.It cannot be accurately measured.
Which of the following is key to the psychological perspective? (2
points)
A) Drug therapy
B) Genetic predisposition
C) Thinking patterns
D)Cultural beliefs
Answers
Answer:
Thinking Patterns
Explanation:
Answer:
Thinking Patters
Explanation:
Which statement best explains how the Compromise of 1850 attempted to resolve debates over the expansion of slavery ?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the options for this question.
However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.
The statement that best explains how the Compromise of 1850 attempted to resolve debates over the expansion of slavery is "The compromise allowed California to join the United States as a free state but would allow slavery in southwestern territories."
Under the compromise of 1850, the territories that we're able to choose by popular sovereignty whether or not to allow slavery were New Mexico and Utah.
The United States had defeated the Mexican Army in the Mexican-American War that started in 1846 and ended in 1848. With the victory, the United States got new big portions of land that belonged to México. But many disputes started in the US about the issue of slavery in the territories. That is why under the Compromise of 1850, the government allowed New Mexico and Utah to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while California entered the Union as a free state.
Answer:
"The compromise allowed California to join the United States as a free state but would allow slavery in southwestern territories."
Explanation:
Write an article on the positive and negative effects of remittance in Nepal.
Answers
To write an article on the positive and negative effects of remittances in Nepal, you must first do structured research on the topic in reliable sources.
How to write a good article?After collecting data and evidence from sources such as books, articles and documents, you must organize your ideas for logical and objective explanation in your text, with a focus on providing important details that help to engage the reader with your text.
Then you can explain in your article the positive and negative effects of remittances in Nepal, such as economic growth, poverty reduction, social impacts and increased reliance on remittances.
Find out more about Nepal on:
https://brainly.com/question/25791015
#SPJ1
Airport administrators take a sample of airline baggage and record the number of bags that weigh more than 75 pounds. What is the variable of interest? Whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No). Average weight of the bags. The airport administrators. Each piece of baggage.
Answers
The variable of interest in this scenario is the number of bags that weigh more than 75 pounds. The variable of interest is "whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No)."
Explanation:
The given situation is that airport administrators take a sample of airline baggage and record the number of bags that weigh more than 75 pounds. Here the variable of interest is the thing that they are investigating. In this case, they are checking whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds or not.
The options given are:
Whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No).
Average weight of the bags.
The airport administrators.
Each piece of baggage.
Out of these four options, the first one is the variable of interest.
The reason for this is that the airport administrators are taking a sample of the baggage to record the number of bags that weigh more than 75 pounds.
Therefore, the variable of interest is whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No).
Airport administrators are inspecting whether the baggage weighs more than 75 pounds or not. The variable of interest is "whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No)."
The airport administrators have taken a sample of airline baggage and recorded the number of bags that weigh more than 75 pounds. The variable of interest is the thing that they are investigating, and in this case, it is whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds.
Therefore, option A, whether the baggage weighs greater than 75 pounds (Yes or No), is the variable of interest. Average weight of the bags, the airport administrators, and each piece of baggage are not variables of interest in this situation.
To know more about variable of interest visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30576958
#SPJ11
How has the way people use natural resources changed? help? giving brainliest
Answers
Answer:
People changed the way they use natural resources by using less of it and more cautiously.
________________ is the theorist known for arguing that conflict is rooted in multiple aspects of social life rather than limiting the scope to economic struggle.
Answers
Max Weber is the theorist known for arguing that conflict is rooted in multiple aspects of social life rather than limiting the scope to economic struggle.
The mother of the sociologist was brought up in strict Calvinism. She gradually came around to a more accepting religion, but her Puritan morals never wavered. She became estranged from her husband as a result of his social activities, especially when he dismissed her protracted mourning over the loss of two of their children. In return, he developed a conventionally dictatorial demeanour at home and required complete submission from his wife and kids. It is believed that Weber's inner torments that plagued him in his later life were a result of his dark home environment, which was characterised by disputes between his parents.
In 1882, Weber left his family to register at the University of Heidelberg. After two years, he had to pause his studies to complete his year of military duty at Strassburg. During this period, he developed strong ties with Ida Baumgarten's family and her husband, the historian Hermann Baumgarten, who had a significant impact on Weber's intellectual growth.
Learn more about Max Weber:
https://brainly.com/question/28616321
#SPJ4
Complete question:
_____ is known for arguing that conflict is rooted in multiple aspects of social life, not just economic struggle
a) Friedrich Engels
b) Karl Marx
c) Max Weber
d) Willem Bonger
All of the following are true about Program Evaluation EXCEPT
Many people believe it is not worth the time and money
90% of nonprofits have done some type of program evaluation
Nonprofits should always use outside evaluators, not staff members for evaluations
Small and midsized nonprofits should
Answers
Small and midsized nonprofits should NOT engage in program evaluation is the statement that is NOT true about Program Evaluation.
Program evaluation is an essential process for nonprofits to assess the effectiveness and impact of their programs. It helps organizations understand whether their programs are achieving the desired outcomes and provides valuable insights for decision-making and improvement.
The statement "Many people believe it is not worth the time and money" is a subjective opinion and not necessarily true. The value of program evaluation can vary depending on the organization's goals, resources, and priorities. However, many organizations recognize the importance of program evaluation in demonstrating accountability, informing strategic planning, and improving program performance.
The statement "90% of nonprofits have done some type of program evaluation" is a general statement and could vary based on the specific context and research findings. While many nonprofits engage in program evaluation, the actual percentage may differ based on factors such as organization size, sector, funding requirements, and resources available.
The statement "Nonprofits should always use outside evaluators, not staff members for evaluations" is also not universally true. The choice of using outside evaluators or internal staff for program evaluations depends on various factors, including the organization's capacity, expertise, resources, and the nature of the evaluation. Both external evaluators and internal staff can contribute valuable perspectives and insights in conducting program evaluations. The decision should be based on the specific needs and circumstances of the organization.
Therefore, the statement that is NOT true is "Small and midsized nonprofits should NOT engage in program evaluation." Program evaluation is valuable for nonprofits of all sizes, and it can be tailored to fit the resources and capacity of smaller organizations.
To know more about Program Evaluation here
https://brainly.com/question/26523302
#SPJ4
Hurry up pls help me
Answers
Answer:
Military
Explanation:
In Feudal Japan, the political power lay with the shoguns, who were similar to military dictators. The emperor was a figurehead who had no rule power. The samurai were the warriors of the shoguns, similar to European knights.