What are the main features of gender equality?

Answer:

C.) Graphics: graph showing students involvement in the plays.

The relationship between the federal government and state governments differ from the relationship between state and local governments as D. The relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.

It should be noted that government means the group of people who have been given the power to look after the affairs of a state.

In this case, the relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.

Learn more about government on:

brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ1

1: Congress has two legislative bodies or chambers: the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. Anyone elected to either body can propose a new law.

2:Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill

3: If the majority of the committee members vote favorably for the bill, it is advanced to the Senate floor, where every Senator has an opportunity to review and debate the legislation. After being voted upon favorably by a committee, the bill is referred to the full Senate for a vote.

4: a majority of 51 out of 100 is required.

5: After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President.

6: When a bill reaches the President, he has three choices. He can: Sign and pass the bill—the bill becomes a law. Refuse to sign, or veto, the bill

7: The veto allows the President to “check” the legislature by reviewing acts passed by Congress and blocking measures he finds unconstitutional, unjust, or unwise.

hope this helps :)

Again enjoining the new proclamation were the district court and court of appeals. The Supreme Court approved the ban's full implementation on December 4 while allowing for judicial challenges.

Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990), Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940), Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Betts v. Brady (1942), Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), Baker v. Nelson (1972), Roe v. Wade (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992)

Roe v. Wade (1973), which established a constitutional right to abortion, was reversed by the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022). However, some state constitutions proactively defend the right to an abortion.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson, which established the separate but equal policy in 1896, was reversed in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The Brown decision resulted in the desegregation of schools.

To learn more about Supreme court refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ4

Answer:

d .

Explanation:

d.judgment not withstanding the verdict

Answer:

biology, blood.

Explanation:

ballistics deals with 2A, so not that one. and crime scene photography does not analyze evidence filmed. but bio does to test for who's dna etc. you can use hair teeth and blood to identify a victim or suspect but with the given example of bodily fluids blood is the best answer. hope this helps.

False. The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized.

The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized. While the commission was an important development in addressing organized crime, the criminal justice system had been recognized and functioning long before this event. The Chicago Crime Commission is a business-led, non-partisan civic watchdog group with the mission of educating the public about the dangers posed by organized crime, particularly street gangs, organized crime, and the tools they use: drugs, weapons, public defilement, tax evasion, fraud, and betting, established in 1919. The Chicago Crime Commission is a crucial source of information for the general public, politicians, prosecutors, the judicial system, the police, and politicians. Directing examination and giving examination on wrongdoing issues, working in those organizations related to coordinated crime; and. providing a comprehensive library on organized crime.

learn more about the Chicago crime commission here

https://brainly.com/question/29514717

#SPJ11

Answer:

NIMD has joined forces with democracy support organizations from across Europe to call for support to human rights, justice and accountability in Belarus.

Explanation:

In response to grave human rights abuses and rigged elections in the country, we have signed a joint statement asking EU Member States and institutions to strengthen their commitment to human rights and democracy in Belarus. The statement came ahead of the European Council Summit on Belarus on 19 August.

Working in the Treasury Department as an anti-terrorist funding expert would involve dealing with various challenges, including those posed by the Hawala system. The Hawala system is an informal money transfer system commonly used in parts of the Middle East, South Asia, and other regions. It operates outside of traditional banking channels and is based on trust and personal relationships.

The challenges the Hawala system presents to an anti-terrorist funding expert are:

To track funds within the Hawala system, an anti-terrorist funding expert would employ various strategies:

It is important to note that effectively tracking funds within the Hawala system requires a combination of financial expertise, intelligence analysis, collaboration, and the utilization of advanced technologies. The challenges are significant, but with a strategic and multi-faceted approach, it is possible to identify and disrupt terrorist funding networks operating through the Hawala system.\(\huge{\mathcal{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{I hope this helps !}}}}}\)

♥️ \(\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\texttt{SUMIT ROY (:}}}}\)

A city or other governmental entity must show that its restrictions are justified by proving that they are "reasonable" and "narrowly tailored" to serve a "significant governmental interest." This is known as the "intermediate scrutiny" standard, and it is applied to restrictions on speech or expression in public forums.

Under this standard, the governmental entity must demonstrate that its restrictions are necessary to achieve a legitimate governmental interest, such as protecting public safety or preventing disruption.

Additionally, the restrictions must be narrowly tailored, meaning that they must be the least restrictive means of achieving the governmental interest.

In the case of Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery, the governmental entity would have to prove that its restrictions on speech or expression are necessary to protect the dignity and solemnity of the cemetery, and that they are the least restrictive means of achieving this goal.

Overall, the governmental entity must show that its restrictions are reasonable, narrowly tailored, and serve a significant governmental interest in order to be justified under the intermediate scrutiny standard.

For more similar questions on scrutiny:

brainly.com/question/24309787

#SPJ11

Answer: The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people in 1,833 state prisons, 110 federal prisons, 1,772 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,134 local jails, 218 immigration detention facilities, and 80 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric

Explanation:

The use of the death penalty varies widely by country and jurisdiction. In some countries, such as China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United States, the death penalty is still used frequently. In other countries, it has been abolished or is rarely used.

In the United States, the use of the death penalty varies by state, with some states using it more frequently than others. However, in recent years, the use of the death penalty in the US has declined. In 2020, for example, there were 17 executions in the US, which was the lowest number since 1991. Additionally, there were 53 new death sentences imposed in the US in 2020, which was the second-lowest number since 1972.

Overall, it is difficult to make a definitive statement about the use of the death penalty worldwide, as it varies widely by country and jurisdiction. However, it is clear that the use of the death penalty has declined in many parts of the world in recent years.

To know more about  penalty, - here

https://brainly.com/question/1178265

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws, declare war, raise and maintain the armed forces, regulate interstate and foreign commerce, tax and spend for the general welfare, and borrow money. Congress also has the power to establish a national currency, regulate immigration, coin money and set its value, establish post offices and roads, and set rules for patents and copyrights.

The Uniform Franchise Disclosure Document (UFDD) is the uniform disclosure document that requires a franchisor to make specific presale disclosures to prospective franchisees.

The UFDD is a legal document that provides important information about the franchise opportunity to potential franchisees. It includes details about the franchisor's background, the terms of the franchise agreement, financial statements, obligations of both the franchisor and franchisee, and other relevant information. The purpose of the UFDD is to ensure transparency and provide prospective franchisees with the necessary information to make informed decisions about investing in a franchise.

Know more about Uniform Franchise Disclosure Document here:

https://brainly.com/question/31831329

#SPJ11

Under the Fair Work Act 2009, when employees engage in unprotected industrial action such as an unauthorized strike, they can face consequences including the loss of pay for the period of the strike.

Section 471 of the Fair Work Act 2009 states that when employees participate in unprotected industrial action, their employer has the right to deduct pay for the period of the strike. The deduction should reflect the amount the employees would have earned if they had worked during that time.

In the case of a one-hour strike, the employees would typically lose one hour's worth of pay. The specific amount deducted would depend on the employees' regular rate of pay, taking into account any applicable penalties, overtime rates, or other relevant factors determined by the applicable industrial instrument or employment agreement.

It is important to note that the Fair Work Act 2009 provides provisions for protected industrial action, which is lawful and provides certain protections for employees. However, when employees engage in unprotected industrial action, the employer has the right to take disciplinary actions, including the deduction of pay for the duration of the strike.

For more such questions on Fair Work Act visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30644627

#SPJ8

The given statement "the principle of equity is unique to civil law legal systems." is FALSE because The principle of equity is not unique to civil law legal systems.

Equity is a concept that plays a role in both common law and civil law systems, aiming to ensure fairness and justice in the application of legal rules.

In common law systems, equity emerged as a set of principles and remedies to address situations where the strict application of common law rules led to unjust results.

In civil law systems, the principle of equity may be incorporated within codes and statutes, guiding the interpretation and application of laws by judges. In both systems, equity serves as a means to mitigate potential unfairness and promote justice.

Learn more about civil law at

https://brainly.com/question/30704261

#SPJ11

When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.

A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.

Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.

On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.

know more about intermediary here:

https://brainly.com/question/29732040

#SPJ8

Answer:

she po in my mouth like she gunna

Based on the information given, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death because he had an underlying disease.

From the information given, Benihana isn't responsible. The man had a high fever. Also, his autopsy showed septicemia which is blood poisoning. He was as well suffering from gout.

The infection that he had could also have been due to exposure to dead animals which made him have septicemia. It should be noted that his death was not because of the neck wrenching that he had. Therefore, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/25449412

The federal government imposes costs on state and local governments through various means, and the courts play a significant role in shaping these dynamics.

Conditions of aid are an essential tool used by the federal government to influence state and local policies and funding allocations.

The federal government imposes costs on state and local governments through various mechanisms, with conditions of aid being a crucial tool. The courts play a significant role in shaping the relationship between the federal government and state/local entities.

One way the federal government imposes costs on state and local governments is through unfunded mandates. These mandates require state and local governments to implement federal policies or programs without providing sufficient funding, leading to a strain on their resources.

This places a financial burden on state and local governments, forcing them to allocate funds towards compliance rather than addressing their own priorities.

Additionally, the federal government can impose costs through regulatory actions. Federal agencies often promulgate regulations that state and local governments must follow, which can be costly to implement and enforce.

This can include compliance with environmental standards, workplace safety regulations, or health requirements. State and local governments must allocate resources to meet these federal standards, potentially diverting funds from other essential services or initiatives.

The courts play a vital role in determining the extent of the federal government's authority and its impact on state and local governments. The interpretation of the Constitution and federal laws by the courts can shape the balance of power between the federal government and state/local entities.

Courts may uphold or strike down federal actions, affecting the costs imposed on state and local governments. They can also influence the interpretation of conditions of aid attached to federal funding, which can impact the flexibility and autonomy of state and local governments in allocating resources.

Conditions of aid refer to requirements imposed by the federal government on state and local governments in exchange for receiving federal funds. These conditions can dictate how the funds should be used, what policies should be implemented, or what standards

Learn more about Federal agencies here :

https://brainly.com/question/30562164

#SPJ11

Explanation:

get Garbrumeyjjethztjarhatjztjafnatmstbatnatntn

A practitioner may be subject to sanctions for disreputable conduct under Circular 230 in all of the following cases, except for a crime involving breach of trust. Hence, option D is appropriate.

Any person who holds a professional practice license or other authorization from the Education Law is referred to as a professional practitioner.

A doctor, dentist, veterinarian, researcher in science, pharmacist, hospital, or another individual who has been granted a license, registration, or other authorization by the United States or even the jurisdiction is referred to as a "practitioner."

The core of your business is the practitioner component. It involves showing concern for the individual in front of you. This emphasizes how you see your clients and carry out your duties. The head, in contrast, to the hand, represents the owner of the firm.

Hence, option B is correct.

Learn more about the Practitioner here:

https://brainly.com/question/14893245

#SPJ1

The given statement, " The supreme court has ruled that deceptive tactics in extracting confessions are unconstitutional." is false because The United States Supreme Court has allowed police to falsely claim that a suspect's companion admitted when he had not, and to claim that they retrieved a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene when there were none.

According to constitutional law, the government may not force confessions, as established by the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the due-process restriction against admitting involuntary confessions into court. To determine whether a defendant's confession was voluntary, reviewing courts typically conduct a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances, including the defendant's personal attributes; the situations under which the confession was obtained; and the conduct of the police.

The United States Supreme Court has permitted police to falsely claim that a suspect's accomplice confessed when he had not, and to have recovered a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene when there were none, deeming such conduct inadequate to render the defendant's confession inadmissible. State courts have allowed police to deceive defendants about a variety of factual topics, such as falsely claiming that DNA evidence and satellite photographs of the crime site exist.

Learn more about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/341135

#SPJ4

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

The Bill of Rights applies to all law, and binds the legislature, the executive, the judiciary and all organs of state.

so yes the city of cape town in bound by the bill of rights

The city of the Cape Town are the Bill of Rights applies to all law, and binds the legislature, the executive, the judiciary and all organs of state.

What is the city?

The term "city" refers to a place with a small population, but all facilities are included. A city is a place located in the geographical center. The city's amenities include parks, infrastructure, and buildings. The cities are the less rural area and more urban areas. The city's advantage is that all facilities are easily available.

The Bills of Rights are the English constitution of the law. The Parliament of the England are the past on the Bill of Rights on 1689. It outlines the rights of Americans in regard to their government. It was the applied to the city of Cape Town as the legislature, judiciary and executive are all the organs of state.

As a the city of the Cape Town are the bound of the all the bill of rights as the including the all legislature, the executive, the judiciary system.

Learn more about on city, here:

https://brainly.com/question/24476050

#SPJ2