Approximately _____ of the states have Three-Strikes laws but nearly ____ of them require the third felony be a serious one.
Approximately half of the states have Three-Strikes laws, but nearly all of them require the third felony to be a serious one.
Three-Strikes laws are designed to impose harsher penalties on repeat offenders, typically by requiring a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years to life imprisonment for the third felony conviction.
However, the specific requirements and details of Three-Strikes laws can vary from state to state. Some states may require that all three felonies be serious, while others may allow for lesser felonies to count as a strike. Additionally, some states may have variations of the Three-Strikes law, such as a Two-Strikes law that requires a mandatory minimum sentence after the second felony conviction.
Learn more about imprisonment here:
https://brainly.com/question/28731950
#SPJ12
3. Define blasphemy. Are laws blasphemy laws constitutional? Explain your reasoning.
Ignoring commission, 250 shares of Kim's Kandies (KKS) were purchased for $10,850 at the close for the week. Calculate the close price for the week. Then find the quarterly dividend payment per share if the annual amount paid was $29.60.
The quarterly dividend payment per share for KKS is $0.0296. To calculate the close price for the week, we need to divide the total purchase price by the number of shares purchased. Therefore, the close price for the week is: $10,850 / 250 shares = $43.40 per share
Now, to find the quarterly dividend payment per share, we first need to calculate the dividend per share for the year. We know that the annual amount paid is $29.60, so:
Dividend per share = Annual amount paid / Number of shares
Dividend per share = $29.60 / 250 shares
Dividend per share = $0.1184
To find the quarterly dividend payment per share, we simply divide the dividend per share by 4:
Quarterly dividend payment per share = Dividend per share / 4
Quarterly dividend payment per share = $0.1184 / 4
Quarterly dividend payment per share = $0.0296
Therefore, the quarterly dividend payment per share for KKS is $0.0296.
For more such questions on purchase price
https://brainly.com/question/30096961
#SPJ11
What are the amendatory of R.A. 3815?
Answer:
Special Protection of Children against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act
Explanation:
________ is considered ""the oldest institution known to the constitution.""
The Supreme Court is considered "the oldest institution known to the Constitution."
As the highest court in the United States, it was established by Article III of the U.S. Constitution in 1789. The Supreme Court's primary function is to interpret and apply the law, ensuring that it aligns with the Constitution. Throughout history, the Court has played a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape of the nation, settling important constitutional questions, and protecting individual rights. Its longevity and significance in the American legal system make it the oldest institution known to the Constitution.
To know more about the Supreme Court, click here: brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
State constitutions also establish their own procedures for amending their state constitutions.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The special Constitution alteration procedures used by States are: a State-wide referendum, special majorities in the Parliament. an absolute majority (or, in other words, a majority of the total number of the members of the House concerned: a two/thirds majority, or a combination of the two.
quizlet a defendant's pretrial rights include all of the following except: group of answer choices prompt arraignment. to be informed of the charges. the right to legal counsel. no cruel or unusual punishment. the right to remain silent.
A defendant's pretrial rights include all of the options mentioned except "no cruel or unusual punishment."
The other options are generally recognized as fundamental rights granted to defendants during the pretrial stage of criminal proceedings.
Prompt arraignment: Defendants have the right to a prompt arraignment, where they are formally informed of the charges against them and are given an opportunity to enter a plea.
To be informed of the charges: Defendants have the right to be fully informed of the specific charges they are facing, including the nature of the offense and the legal basis for the accusation.
The right to legal counsel: Defendants have the right to legal representation, either through an attorney of their choice or appointed by the court if they cannot afford one.
The right to remain silent: Defendants have the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves during the pretrial phase or at any stage of the legal proceedings.
However, "no cruel or unusual punishment" is a right protected under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which primarily applies to the sentencing phase of a criminal case rather than the pretrial stage.
Learn more about Prompt arraignment
https://brainly.com/question/19637714
#SPJ11
which department would you approach if your human rights had been violated?
A taxpayer who failed to claim the depreciation deduction for the last 12 years may correct this by ?
If a person fails to claim depreciation, the most important consequence is that he lose the greatest tax benefit.
If a person has claimed incorrect amount of depreciation he can do the catchup adjustment, in order to correct the improper depreciation in the previous years.
Even if, the taxpayer has failed to claim depreciation entirely, he can do the following:
1) File an amended return.
2) The taxpayer can increase the basis of the property by the amount of depreciation that should have been claimed.
3) He/she can file form 3155 to change the accounting policy.
4) In the current year, he can file form 4562 to include the unclaimed depreciation in this year.
To know more about depreciation: https://brainly.com/question/28588335
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
The courts of the American West were dominated by
A: trained attorneys.
B: vigilantes.
C: land barons.
D: lay judges.
The courts of the American West were dominated by trained attorneys.
The Supreme Court of the United States, also called SCOTUS is the only court established by the Constitution of the United States under the Judiciary Act of 1789. Initially it had only six members.
The initial judges of the court were trained attorneys while some of them were hard core conservatives. Their decisions were very firm and they do not think anything humane other than the rulebook.
As the world moved on, the thinking of the judges also changed. They started supporting the liberal ideas like giving equal chance of participation to females.
To know more about Supreme Court here
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
The designation of a(n) _____ means that the plaintiff will not be required to prove that the defendant lied or exhibited reckless disregard for the truth in publishing a libel.
The designation of a "public figure" or "public figure status" means that the plaintiff will not be required to prove that the defendant lied or exhibited reckless disregard for the truth in publishing a libel.
In the context of defamation law, public figures are individuals who have achieved a certain level of prominence or notoriety in society, such as politicians, celebrities, or other individuals who have willingly thrust themselves into the public eye. When a public figure brings a defamation lawsuit, they face a higher burden of proof known as "actual malice."
Actual malice, in this context, does not refer to ill will or spite. Instead, it means that the defendant made false statements with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. However, for private individuals who are not public figures, they typically only need to prove negligence or fault on the part of the defendant.
The designation of a public figure recognizes that individuals in the public eye have greater access to platforms for rebuttal and are subject to more scrutiny and criticism. Thus, they must meet a higher standard when it comes to proving defamation.
To know more about defamation law, please visit
https://brainly.com/question/28342523
#SPJ11
what are the three competence expect from good/ideal citizens
Answer: Citizenship competencies allow for citizens to respect and defend human rights, to contribute actively to a peaceful living, to participate responsibly and constructively in the democratic processes and to respect and value plurality and differences.
Explanation:
The three competence expect from good/ideal citizens are that the citizenship competencies enable citizens to respect and defend human rights, actively contribute to peaceful living, responsibly and constructively participate in democratic processes.
What are the human rights?Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Human rights are fundamental rights that all of us have simply by virtue of our humanity. They exemplify important societal values such as fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are a significant form of protection for all of us, especially those who may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or isolation.
Learn more about the human rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ5
Where is the majority of a city budget spending?
State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).
Mac, a successful restaurateur from georgia, wanted to expand his business to memphis, tennessee. He was denied a business license from the regulatory authorities in memphis. The authorities told him that he was a nonresident and could not get a license to conduct business in tennessee. This denial is a blatant violation of the?.
This denial is a blatant violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
The Constitution's Privileges and Immunities Clause stipulates that "the residents of each state shall have all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the various states."
This provision limits governmental attempts to discriminate against citizens from other states while defending the fundamental rights of individual citizens. However, only basic rights are covered by the Privileges and Immunities Clause, not all business activities.What is a Privileges and Immunities Clause example?
Life, liberty, and property are examples of privileges, as are the right to sue, the right to the protection of a federal marshal, the right to compete for federal office and the right to vote in federal elections.To Learn more about Privileges and Immunities Clause, Click the links.
https://brainly.com/question/2416141
#SPJ4
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
a. A married couple getting divorced.
b. An employee steals products from their employer.
c. A customer slips on a wet floor inside a restaurant.
Answer:
A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.
Explanation:
so it should be b
analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community
Answer:
lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.
Explanation:
Several persons together stole a painting from an art museum. One of them, who was the driver, was caught during the commission of another crime. He told police that "I didn't even get any money from the art museum. It all went to the first guy and the second guy." When the first and second guy go on trial for the theft of the art painting, is the driver's statement admissible in court?
Answer:
If the driver's statement was voluntarily obtained by the police without duress, then the statement will be admissible. But, if otherwise, it cannot be admitted. Such self-incriminating statements are usually used as evidence for police to arrest a suspect, but to convict. This is why at the point of arrest, the suspect is read his or her "rights to remain silent."
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of the trial judge to determine any issues as to the statement's voluntariness. This implies that the confession can be admitted into evidence if the judge determines that the confession was voluntarily made by the driver. The judge will not admit the statement if it is determined that there were some use of threats of force, violence, or intimidation on the part of the police to obtain the self-incriminating confession.
What does it mean when our court system is identified as a dual court system?
Answer:
dual court system the division of the courts into two separate systems, one federal and one state,
To be valid, a time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be viewpoint neutral and rationally related to a legitimate government purpose
A time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be Viewpoint neutral and rationally related to a legitimate government purpose to be valid. The correct option is D.
A limited public forum, as used in the context of First Amendment rights, is a venue or area under the control of the government that permits some forms of speech but is subject to reasonable restrictions. Time, place and manner restrictions imposed on a constrained public forum must satisfy specific requirements in order to be valid.
They must not favor or discriminate against any particular perspectives or ideas; rather, they must be viewpoint neutral. The regulations must also be rationally related to a lawful government purpose which means they must serve a legitimate public interest without being capricious or excessively restrictive. Following these guidelines makes it easier to make sure that the laws are constitutionally sound and do not restrict people's freedom of speech.
Learn more about public forum at:
brainly.com/question/25527470
#SPJ4
The complete question is "A time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be __________ neutral and __________to be valid.
A Content; rationally related to a legitimate government purpose
B Viewpoint; narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest
C Content; narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest
D Viewpoint; rationally related to a legitimate government purpose"
Julian entered the U.S. in 2002 and was arrested for human trafficking in 2004. He served 10 years in prison, and returned to his native country in 2014. He attempted to regain entry into the U.S. at a valid port of entry in 2019. The immigration officer denied his re-entry in 2019. Were the officer's actions valid? Why or why not?
Answer:
Much of this depends on his immigration status when he committed the crime. If we assume he had illegal status and If he was ordered to leave, he would not be allowed reentry for 5-20 years, if ever. Even if he had a green card, he would be barred from reentry. He was most likely barred from reentry because of a felony. A felony charge will ensure no reentry. The officer was correct.
These are for trafficking, each state will have other laws.
The U.S. Code, Title 22, Chapter 78 – Trafficking Victims Protection
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA)
The Customs and Facilitations and Trade Enforcement Reauthorization Act of 2009
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004
The PROTECT Act of 2003
The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
The Mann Act of 1910
Melbourne Awesome Ltd supplies a wide range of folding bicycles. Melbourne Awesome Ltd derives Australian sourced income for the current tax year comprising net income from trading of $80,000, franked distribution from public companies amounting to $28,000, (carrying an imputation credit of $12,000), unranked distributions from resident private companies amounting to $25,000 and rental income of $5,500. Melbourne Awesome Ltd also have total deductions (Business Expenses) totaling $55,000.
Answer: $21450
Explanation:
Here's the remainder of the question:
Required: Calculate the net tax payable by All Sports Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019. (Assume company tax rate is 30%)
The following can be gotten from the question:
Rental income = $5500
Add: Net income from trading = $80,000
Less: Business expenses = $55,000
Add: Franked distribution = $28,000
Less: imputation credit = $12,000
Add: unfranked distribution = $25,000
Total income = $71,500
Net tax payable will be:
= 30% × $71500
= 30/100 × $71500
= 0.3 × $71500
= $21450
If research could show that the tendency to commit crime is inherited, what should be done with young children of violent prone criminals?
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Question # 10
Match List
Match the job to the tasks associated with it.
Put responses in the correct input to answer the question.
paralegals
legal secretaries
court reporters
mediators
We can match the jobs to the tasks associated with it in the following way:
Paralegals: Experienced and knowledgeable persons handling paper work for court cases such as divorce, estates, bankruptciesLegal secretaries: Provide administrative, typing and copying supportCourt reporters: Transcribe spoken or recorded speech into written form; often need to do voice writing as well.Mediators: Solve legal disputes in the workplace, families, and community with complete confidentiality.Who is a mediator?A mediator is a professional trained to act as a neutral facilitator during a mediation process. He is usually an impartial third party in a mediation.
Mediation is a process in which parties discuss disputes, and the mediator helps them to reach an agreeable settlement.
A mediators play a role in some of these situations:
domestic relations,worker's compensation,commercial transactionslabor or community relations,legal depositions or settlements, etc.Learn more about a mediator at brainly.com/question/30501868.
#SPJ1
What was the holding of the appellate court in Dixon v. University of Toledo, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged a violation of the Equal Pay Act
The appellate court in Dixon v. University of Toledo held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of wage discrimination under the Equal Pay Act. The court found in favor of the University of Toledo.
Dixon v. University of Toledo is a legal case concerning the Equal Pay Act. The holding of the appellate court in Dixon v. University of Toledo was that the plaintiff, Dixon, had not made a prima facie case of discrimination under the Equal Pay Act.
The court held that in order to establish a prima facie case of wage discrimination under the Equal Pay Act, a plaintiff must show that the employer paid employees of the opposite sex different wages for substantially similar work. The court reasoned that Dixon had not met this burden, as she failed to provide evidence of any specific male employee who was paid a higher wage for the same work as her.
The court further held that even if Dixon had made a prima facie case of wage discrimination, the University of Toledo had presented evidence that the wage differential was based on factors other than sex, such as education and experience. Therefore, the court found in favor of the University of Toledo and dismissed Dixon's claim under the Equal Pay Act.
To learn more about Equal Pay Act
https://brainly.com/question/1020025
#SPJ11
What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.
plz mark as brainliest
How might limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes affect schools
Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools may impact nutrient intake, culinary variety, cost-effectiveness, and cultural authenticity of meals.
How limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools impact nutrition, culinary variety, costs, and cultural considerations?Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools can have various effects. Here are some potential impacts:
Nutritional considerations: Starchy vegetables like potatoes can be a significant source of carbohydrates, fiber, and certain vitamins and minerals. Limiting these vegetables may result in reduced nutrient intake among students, particularly if suitable alternative options are not provided. It is important to ensure that any limitations on starchy vegetables are accompanied by a diverse range of nutritious alternatives to maintain a balanced diet.Culinary variety and student preferences: Potatoes are a versatile ingredient used in various dishes, and they may be popular among students. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could potentially reduce the culinary variety offered in school meals, leading to fewer options and potentially impacting student satisfaction and food preferences.Cost considerations: Potatoes are often considered a cost-effective food item, which can be beneficial for schools operating within budget constraints. If starchy vegetables are limited, schools may need to explore alternative options, which could potentially lead to increased costs for sourcing and preparing other vegetables or ingredients.Cultural and regional considerations: Potatoes hold cultural significance in many regions, and certain cuisines heavily rely on them as a staple ingredient. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could impact the cultural authenticity of meals served in schools, particularly in communities where potatoes are traditionally consumed.Learn more about Limiting starchy vegetables
brainly.com/question/20859432
#SPJ11
the traditional legal rule regarding confessions is that confessions
The traditional legal rule regarding confessions emphasizes that confessions must be voluntary, reliable, and admissible in court.
The traditional legal rule regarding confessions is that they must be given voluntarily and without coercion. This means that any confession obtained through force, threats, or promises of leniency would not be admissible in court. In addition, the suspect must have been properly advised of their Miranda rights before making a confession. However, recent court decisions have expanded the definition of coercion to include psychological manipulation and other non-physical tactics. This has led to a greater focus on the mental and emotional state of the suspect at the time of the confession. Ultimately, the admissibility of a confession depends on the specific circumstances surrounding its acquisition, and it is up to the judge to determine whether it meets the legal standards for admissibility. In short, while the traditional legal rule regarding confessions remains in place, it has been subject to evolving interpretations in light of changing legal and societal norms.
To know more about confessions visit:
brainly.com/question/14912598
#SPJ11