Under 803(8) public records refer to documents, reports, or data compilations maintained by a government agency or office, including those made by law enforcement, that is kept in the regular course of business.
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence 803(8), public records refer to documents, reports, or data compilations maintained by a government agency or office, including those made by law enforcement, that is kept in the regular course of business. These records are admissible as evidence in court proceedings without requiring the presence of the person who created or prepared them.
Public records can include a wide range of materials, including accident reports, birth and death certificates, marriage licenses, property deeds, and tax records. They can also encompass more specialized documents such as building permits, zoning ordinances, and environmental impact reports. In addition, public records may contain information that is sensitive or confidential, such as criminal records or medical reports. The record must also be kept in the regular course of business and maintained in a manner that ensures its accuracy and reliability.
know more about law enforcement here:
https://brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ11
Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shooting occurred less than one year ago. Your officer shot and killed an unarmed man, but the officer was acquitted of all charges in the shooting. Since the verdict was announced, there has been an uptick in crime in your city. You were made aware of the incident before you were hired, and you were told that the Department is now engaging in “de-policing” - departing from proactive policing – because of the anti-cop hostility in the community. Before you even had a chance to put your coffee mug on your new desk, your administrative assistant runs into your office yelling, “they’re here!” You find out that a protest march is underway with numerous reporters working their way through the melee. Your community has lost trust in your Police Department and the courts, and they are demanding that you do something. Community leaders make their way into your office. You pause a moment - and then say, “Good to see you. You saved me a phone call. Come, let’s sit down and discuss what we can do to help our community.”
Answer:
Explanation:
1. As a leader of police officer, you have many years of policing under your belt, so with that role in mind you can establish new rules and regulations for your officers as the chief.
2. As someone who is new to the community, listening to the thoughts of the community leader will be essential to helping reduce crime and protests.
3. Gathering of evidence of the case of the police officer killing the unarmed man can 1. help determine if there really was a case of self defense or not 2. familiarizing yourself to the case more on evidence and less of word of mouth and 3. reappealing the verdict to manslaughter.
4. Establish a compromise with the community leader to address "de-policing" as unproductive counter to the rising crime rates.
5. Establish new regulations for the community leaders so no similar reoccurring incidents may repeat themselves in such turmoil.
I waited for my dad to come back from the store to get milk its been 18 years what happened to him
Answer:
I am sorry that this has happened however he is not going to come back. Most likely cause he dislikes you. :)
Explanation:
Explain the major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases.
The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are
"direct influences," which include things like legal and political experiences."indirect and distant impacts," which include things like broad legal and political.What is a Judge?Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.
The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.
Read more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ1
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. What issue did they bring to the court?
3. Who is the defendant?
4. What was their defense?
5. Who won the case?
estate of Melvin w Ballantyne, Deceased.(T.C.M. (CCH)2002-160(2003)
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
If you’re driving a car and know there’s a motorcyclist around you, you should______.
Answer:
Stay a cautious amount away from them. Give them space. Keep attention on the road and the motorcyclists
Explanation:
is this one of you answer? if so sorry
How can you explain The Frank-Starling law of the heart? In simple words?
In simple terms, the Frank-Starling law of the heart states that the more blood that is in the heart, the more it will stretch and the stronger it will contract.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is a principle that describes the relationship between the heart's ability to pump blood and the amount of blood that is in the heart. This law is named after two scientists, Otto Frank and Ernest Starling, who discovered it in the early 1900s.
This increased contractility leads to an increased stroke volume, which is the amount of blood that is pumped with each heartbeat.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is important because it helps explain how the heart can respond to changes in the body's demands for blood. For example, if the body needs more oxygen, the heart will pump more blood to meet that demand.
This increased pumping ability helps maintain blood flow and ensures that the body's cells receive the oxygen they need.
The Frank-Starling law also helps explain why the heart can compensate for certain types of heart disease or damage.
For example, if the heart is weakened, it will work harder to pump more blood to meet the body's demands, and this increased contractility can help maintain blood flow and prevent the symptoms of heart failure.
The Frank-Starling law of the heart is a principle that describes the relationship between the heart's ability to pump blood and the amount of blood that is in the heart.
To learn more about Frank-Starling law refer here
https://brainly.com/question/16829494#
#SPJ11
Which type of loan will use a HUD-1 in place of a Closing Disclosure?
Answer:
The HUD-1 Settlement Statement is a document that lists all charges and credits to the buyer and to the seller in a real estate settlement, or all the charges in a mortgage refinance. If you applied for a mortgage on or before October 3, 2015, or if you are applying for a reverse mortgage, you receive a HUD-1.
Reverse mortgages are the type of loan that typically uses the HUD-1 instead of Closing Disclosure.
This is because the HUD-1 allows for better organization of reverse mortgage terms, allowing everyone involved in the reverse mortgage to better understand their contractual obligations.
It is important to emphasize that the HUD-1 is a document where the terms, values and charges of a real estate contract are presented. As the HUD-1 is designed for use in real estate agreements, its use in reverse mortgages is extremely beneficial.
In relation to reverse mortgages we can state that:
These are mortgage loans;Allows the buyer to access the free value of the property.Allows the promotion of loans to older users.No monthly payment required.Based on this, we can conclude that because it is directly related to real estate loans, the HUD-1 is efficient in presenting and organizing the terms of a reverse mortgage.
You can find more information about this at the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/12935382?referrer=searchResults
beats are the basic unit for measuring time in music, and are what enable us to organize that time.
The music's time structure is referred to as its rhythm. It collaborates with melody and harmony to instill a sense of order. The beat, the basic time interval in music, is the most fundamental component of rhythm.
The first image that might come to mind when you hear the word rhythm is a drum beat. But rhythm is much more complicated than that. Music is the deliberate arrangement of sounds, as we stated earlier.
The music's time structure is referred to as its rhythm. It collaborates with melody and harmony to instill a sense of order. The beat, the basic time interval in music, is the most fundamental component of rhythm
To know more about MUSIC here
https://brainly.com/question/26373912
#SPJ4
3.4 What is the rule of law'?
The term “Rule of Law” is derived from the French phrase 'La Principe de Legality' (the principle of legality) which refers to a government based on principles of law and not of men. [1] In a broader sense Rule of Law means that Law is supreme and is above every individual.
Answer:
I don't know if I can help in any way I can get a ride to the train station and sweet dreams my love I love you too baby girl and I will be there at the same time I don't have a great day and sweet dreams my love I love you too baby girl and I will be there at the same time
Discuss the politicization of the judicial process for selection
of U.S. Supreme Court Justices today and the qualifications you
think are important for a justice to possess.
The politicization of the judicial process for the selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices has become a prominent issue in recent times. Qualifications which are generally considered crucial
The nomination and confirmation of justices have increasingly become contentious and politically charged, as different political factions seek to shape the ideology of the Court to align with their policy preferences. This has led to heightened scrutiny of nominees' political leanings, judicial philosophies, and potential impact on key issues.
One aspect of the politicization is the ideological litmus test applied by political parties and interest groups during the nomination process. Presidents and senators often prioritize appointing or confirming justices who align with their party's values and policy objectives. This focus on ideology has led to heated debates and divisive confirmation battles, with nominees' records, speeches, and personal beliefs subject to intense scrutiny.
Another factor contributing to the politicization is the perception that Supreme Court decisions have significant implications for shaping public policy. Given the Court's authority to interpret the Constitution and make rulings on contentious issues such as abortion rights, voting rights, and civil liberties, political actors have increasingly viewed Supreme Court appointments as opportunities to advance their policy agendas.
When considering the qualifications important for a Supreme Court Justice, it is essential to prioritize qualities that ensure impartiality, competence, and respect for the rule of law.
While specific qualifications may vary, the following are generally considered crucial:
1. Judicial Temperament: Justices should possess a demeanor characterized by fairness, open-mindedness, and impartiality. They should approach cases with a commitment to interpreting the law rather than promoting personal or political agendas.
2. Legal Expertise: Strong knowledge and understanding of constitutional law, statutory interpretation, and legal principles are essential for effective adjudication. A justice should possess a solid foundation in legal scholarship and demonstrate the ability to analyze complex legal issues.
3. Judicious Decision-Making: Justices must exhibit sound judgment and the ability to weigh competing arguments in a thoughtful and reasoned manner. They should be able to evaluate precedent, consider the consequences of their rulings, and apply legal principles consistently.
4. Integrity and Ethics: A justice should have a demonstrated commitment to upholding the highest ethical standards. They should be impartial and free from conflicts of interest, maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and inspiring public confidence in the Court.
5. Respect for the Constitution: Justices must have a deep respect for the Constitution as the foundation of the legal system. They should possess a commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights and liberties.
It is crucial to emphasize the importance of selecting justices based on their qualifications and commitment to the rule of law rather than partisan considerations. Depoliticizing the selection process can help ensure the integrity and independence of the Supreme Court, allowing it to fulfill its vital role as a check on the other branches of government and a guardian of the Constitution.
To know more about politicization, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32340790#
#SPJ11
What region of the United States saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution
first?
O New England States
O Southern States
O Newly acquired Western States
O The Great Lakes region of the Northwest Territory
The region of the United States that saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution first was New England States.
What is Industrial Revolution?It broadly describes the transition from a handicraft-based economy to one dominated by industrial and machine production. These technological advancements brought about new methods of working and living that fundamentally altered civilization.
The Industrial Revolution was the gradual adoption of new manufacturing techniques in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States between roughly 1760 and some time between 1820 and 1840. The four different industrial revolutions are those involving coal, gas, electronics, nuclear power, the internet, and unrenewable energy. The New England States see the start of the industrial revolutions.
Learn more on United States here:
brainly.com/question/30156817
#SPJ4
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
A driver was operating his vehicle along a residential street at the posted speed limit when he saw a ball roll across the street. The driver did not slow down because the ball cleared his path before he reached it. A few seconds later, a child darted out into the street after the ball without looking for cars. The driver's car struck the child, and the child was injured. The child's parents brought an action on the child's behalf against the driver in a jurisdiction that follows traditional contributory negligence rules. At trial, the above facts were established. At the close of the evidence, the driver moved for a directed verdict. What should the court do
Deny the driver's motion because it will be up to the jury to determine whether he should have slowed down to below the speed limit. A jury could find that a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances (watching the ball roll into the street) would slow down to avoid any foreseeable risk of hitting a child darting into the street.
At the trail for the injured child, as the driver moved for a directed verdict; the court will "deny the driver's motion".
What is Direct Verdict?A trial judge's decision to direct a jury's judgement is made after concluding that there is insufficient legal evidence to allow a fair jury to reach a different verdict. A directed verdict may be granted by the trial court spontaneously or in response to a motion made by either party.
The direct verdict is asked by-
In a criminal trial, the defense attorney for the defendant may move to have the charges dropped on the grounds that the prosecution has not made its case.In effect, in both kinds of cases, the lawyer asks the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant. The judge will either grant or deny the motion.Reason for the denial of drivers' verdict is-
As for the given case of child accident, the court will deny the driver's motion because because the jury will decide whether or not he ought to have slowed down to the legal pace. A jury could decide that a reasonable, cautious individual would have slowed down in the same situation (seeing the ball roll into the street) to reduce the likelihood of running into a youngster who was darting into the roadway.To know about the authenticity of evidence, here
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ4
teachers are not required to notify a family before they report them to authorities for suspected abuse or neglect.
abuse a child protection policy that outlines what to do when a teacher or other staff member is suspected of hurting a kid; a designated teacher in charge of child safety
family before You should contact the police or your neighborhood social services if you have suspicions that a kid is being abused. authorities ell the teacher in charge of child protection if you work in a school. In accordance with the local safeguarding children board's guidelines, they will take appropriate action and notify the appropriate authorities as necessary. Teachers and administrators must alert the person or family accused of the conduct as well as the authorities when probable abuse or neglect is reported. abuse The responsibility for keeping your child safe at school is on the institution.
learn more about abuse here:
https://brainly.com/question/4440627
#SPJ4
According to Boatright, what's right, and what's wrong, with stakeholder theory? What is the strongest argument against his claim that all stakeholders are best served when managers focus on profit for shareholders?
Boatright’s analysis of the stakeholder theory depicts a positive evaluation of the theory, however, there are certain elements of the theory that he considers flawed.
This paper will examine the strengths and weaknesses of Boatright's analysis of the stakeholder theory and why it cannot be fully accepted.
According to Boatright, the stakeholder theory has been effective in business practices, although, it has not been taken seriously in theory. He argues that the theory is not just about corporate social responsibility but also about the management of corporations and the appropriate actions that should be taken to manage corporations and the stakeholders involved. He acknowledges that the stakeholder theory could still be improved by giving more clarity on its key concepts and how it should be incorporated into practice.
Boatright's strongest argument against his claim that all stakeholders are best served when managers focus on profit for shareholders is the impact of social capital. Social capital argues that companies need to be responsive to their surrounding communities to gain trust and better relationships with customers and stakeholders. In this view, profitability is not always the main goal. Social capital helps companies to gain social resources like trust, confidence, and loyalty. Hence, Boatright fails to acknowledge the impact of social capital, which is vital to building long-term sustainability and a positive reputation for companies.
Read more about stakeholder's theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/32536678
#SPJ11
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
100
20
10
50
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.
The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.
It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.
The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.
To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/27878011
#SPJ4
Correct question:
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
a) 100
b) 20
c) 10
d) 50
What usually motivates entrepreneurs to put forth the time, effort and energy to their craft?
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
What was the subject of the most debate between large and small states at the constitutional convention?taxesslaveryrepresentationdelegaton.
The subject of the most debate between large and small states at the constitutional convention would be Representation.
So, the correct option is C.
The gathering was sometimes referred to as the "federal convention" or "Philadelphia convention" because it was held there. The goal of many of the delegates who came here was to design the new constitution. Some states supported a strong central government, while others opposed it. While small states desired equal representation with larger ones in Congress, large states believed that they should have more of a voice there.
The argument between large and small states centered mostly on who should be represented in Congress. The larger states fought for representation based on population size, while the smaller states fought for equal representation for all states.
Learn to know more about the Constitutional Convention on
https://brainly.com/question/28442712
#SPJ4
- A court that does not typically hear original trials, but
whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is
likely to be a(n):
a)Trial Court
b)Civil Court
c) Intermediate Appellate Cour
C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court
An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.
To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here
https://brainly.com/question/33718034
#SPJ11
According to Hirschi and Hindelang, there is a clear link between criminality and:
Answer:
Low intelligence.
Answer:
low IQ
Explanation:
Also known as low intelligence
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
It is true that courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision if the actual amount of damages is difficult to determine and the total amount is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
A court considers two factors when deciding whether a liquidated damages provision is a penalty:
(1) the rationality of the dollar value specified and
(2) the complexity of deciding and asserting actual damages in the event of a breach.
However, a liquidated damage provision that is viewed as a "penalty" unconnected to any anticipated or actual loss is unlikely to be enforced by a court.
Learn more on liquidated damages damages-https://brainly.com/question/28498187
#SPJ4
The question was incomplete. Check below the full question.
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm. There are two general categories of remedies—legal and equitable.
Question 7 of 20
Which
the following is an example of a violation of civil law?
A. A group of children deface property.
B. A designer hasn't been paid for her work.
C. A passenger assaults a taxi cab driver.
O D. An individual commits credit card fraud
Answer:
It’s probably
Explanation:
C
Answer: the answer is B: a designer hat hasn't been paid for her work
Explanation:
because
A: is vandalism
C: is assault or battery
D: is scamming or credit card fraud
so B is the answer
thank you for your time.
ghost out
A borrower questions the amount of the notary fee appearing on the settlement the notary agent should do what next?
Answer:
The Notary Signing Agent should: Recommend that the borrower contact the lender's representative before signing the documents.
What is the purpose of a committee system in our government?
The full House or Senate receives the legislative recommendations that committees make after studying how the government operates, identifying problems that need to be looked into, gathering and analyzing data, and reviewing their findings.
The Local Government Act of 2000 established this system, which is being used the most frequently. Cabinet members can make decisions on their own in certain municipalities, but the entire cabinet must agree in others. As the country expanded quickly, the number and complexity of federal laws also increased. Legislators came to the conclusion that the duties they were facing could not be completed in the limited period allocated to a select committee, let alone a single Congress.
Learn more about Legislators here
https://brainly.com/question/29812215
#SPJ4
In State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because ____________.
In State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party.
In the case of State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party. The Third Party Doctrine holds that when a person shares their information with a third party, they no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
As a result, the information becomes the property of the third party.In other words, when Patino sent text messages to another person, he effectively relinquished his privacy rights over that information. Because the recipient of the messages was a third party, the police had the legal right to access the messages without violating the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Learn more about Amendment's protections https://brainly.com/question/28949431
#SPJ11
The Texas Supreme Court decides the case of Livewire Co. v. Power Corp.
Of nine justices, five believe the judgment should be in Livewire's favor.
Justice Bellamy, one of the five, writes a separate opinion. The four justices
who believe the judgment should be in Power's favor join in a third
separate opinion
Bellamy's opinion is
Answer:
a concurring opinion
Explanation: trust me
TRUE / FALSE. libertarians reject inheritance as a legitimate means of acquiring wealth.
False. Libertarians generally do not reject inheritance as a legitimate means of acquiring wealth. They emphasize individual liberty and property rights, which typically include the right to transfer wealth through inheritance.
Libertarianism is a political theory that promotes liberty as a fundamental principle (from French: libertaire, "libertarian"; from Latin: libertas, "freedom"). By emphasising the rule of law, pluralism, cosmopolitanism, cooperation, civil and political rights, bodily autonomy, freedom of association, free trade, freedom of expression, freedom of choice, freedom of movement, individualism, and voluntary association, libertarians aim to maximise autonomy and political freedom and minimise the state's encroachment on and violations of individual liberties.
To know more about Libertarians
https://brainly.com/question/29553618
#SPJ11
What resolution came about in response to the debate over legislative representation?.
The Great Compromise came in response to the debate over legislative representation
During the summer of 1787 the representatives to the constitutional convention in Philadephia debated for months on one issue which was about how congressional representation would be determined, after much deliberation, the delegates appointed equal state representation in the senate and proportional representation in the house of representation, which is called the "Great Compromise", or also the " Connecticut Compromise". such a unique plan resolved the most controversial aspectof drafting of the constitution for congressional representation.
To know more about The Great Compromise refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/6839536?referrer=searchResults.
To know more about the US. government refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/2496524?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
The area of consumer protection has given rise to a myriad of statutes at both the federal and state level that seek to protect the consumer from the dangers of the marketplace. (Ch. 44) Identify and discuss any three (3) specific areas of consumer activity that have become a focus of this type of legislation. Consumer Protection Ch 44 Please note that this area of law is reflective of many statutes that address the subject matter, only some of which, are referenced within this outline. Introduction Consumer transactions defined as goods, credit, services or land for personal, household or family purposes (cf. caveat emptor - "let the buyer beware" A. State and federal Consumer Protection Agencies Abuses include credit, deceptive trade practices, unsafe products, unfair pricing. 1) State and local consumer protection agencies-address fraudulent and deceptive trade and sales practices, defective goods and services 2) Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-re: used cars, franchises, funerals, door to door sales etc. unfair competition (ant- trust) unfair and deceptive trade practices deception-misrepresentation, omission or practice likely to mislead advertising substantiation -reasonable basis for advertising claims 3) Remedies Affirmative disclosure Corrective advertising Cease and desist orders 4) Consumer Product Safety Commission - protects public re unsafe products, evaluates products, uniform standards, excludes autos, tires, tobacco, firearms, food. drugs among others and enforcement re: hazardous substances 5) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau-authority over consumer financial products or services 6) Other federal consumer protection agencies- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) -autos, etc. Federal Drug administration (FDA)-food, tobacco, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, etc. B. Consumer purchases State contract law (UCC Art 2) provide many rights and obligations 1) Federal warranty protection -applies to sellers of consumer goods who give written warranties (ensure certain features of consumer goods or services) 2) As per Magnusson Moss Warranty Act need provide adequate assurance re: warranties (disclosures, labeling, disclaimers) 3) State lemon laws-provides new car purchasers w/ rights 4) Consumer right of rescission w/n 3 days of signing C. Consumer Credit Transactions Applies to any credit transactions re: goods, services or land for personal, household or family- Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) 1) Access to the market-addresses discrimination in extending credit/ several applicable statutory protections 2) Disclosure requirements Truth - in- Lending Act (TILA) provides information such as charges, late fees etc. re: credit accounts 3) Among areas addressed are: Home equity loans fixed amount secured by home Billing errors re: disputed amounts Settlement charges -applies to real estate escrow accounts Mortgage Reform and Anti- Predatory Lending Act 4) Contract terms- FTC limit rights of holders in due course when debt arises out of consumer credit transaction 5) Consumer credit card fraud- limits liability for unauthorized use up to $50 6) Fair reportage- Fair Credit Reporting Act (FRCA) -prohibits use of inaccurate or dated information in consumer reports 7) Credit card bill of rights re: interest rates, notices, payments and penalties D. Creditor remedies 1) Wage assignments - protects against discharge from employment Garnishment -only by court order 2) Security interest in goods- seller may retain security interest in goods sold w/ restrictions 3) Debt collection practices-prohibitions on abusive, deceptive, unfair practices including harassing conduct
Numerous federal and state laws have been passed in the field of law known as consumer protection in an effort to protect consumers from the risks present in the marketplace. Three specific consumer activities that have come under the purview of such legislation are as follows:
1. Purchases by consumers: This refers to the sale of products and services, as well as real estate, for private, domestic, or familial use. For instance, written warranties offered by vendors of consumer goods are covered under the Federal Warranty Protection. On the other hand, new automobile buyers have rights under lemon laws.
2. The use of consumer credit: It covers all credit agreements for purchases of commodities, services, or real estate made for private, domestic, or familial use. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) is applicable to a number of legal protections, such as banning discrimination in credit-granting.
3. Credit Remedies: There are many different types of creditor remedies, including wage assignments, garnishments, security interests in property, and debt collection techniques. Garnishment is only legal with a court order, and wage assignments guard against termination from employment. The credit card bill of rights places restrictions on credit card users' interest rates, notifications, payments, and penalties, and fair reporting forbids the use of inaccurate or out-of-date information in consumer reports. Protecting consumers from dishonest and misleading business practices, as well as faulty goods and services, is the responsibility of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other government consumer protection organizations, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
To know more about the purpose of Consumer Rights:
https://brainly.com/question/27317480
#SPJ11