What are 2 effects of the stock market crash of 1929?

1941 Pearl Harbor attack justified internment of Japanese ancestors in the US, using stereotypes to protect national security. The correct answer is (a) stereotypes.

The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was driven by widespread stereotypes and prejudices against people of Japanese descent.

In the aftermath of the attack on Pearl Harbor, there was widespread fear and suspicion that individuals of Japanese ancestry, even if they were American citizens, posed a threat to national security.

These stereotypes painted Japanese Americans as potential spies or saboteurs, despite lacking any evidence to support such claims.

Based on these stereotypes, the government implemented Executive Order 9066, which authorized the forced relocation and internment of over 120,000 Japanese Americans, including both immigrants and American citizens.

The internment camps were established in various locations across the United States, where Japanese Americans were detained under harsh and deplorable conditions for the duration of the war.

The internment of Japanese Americans is now widely regarded as a grave injustice and violation of civil rights. It serves as a reminder of the damaging impact of stereotypes and racial prejudice, as well as the erosion of individual liberties during times of national crisis.

Learn more about immigrants here:

https://brainly.com/question/28772696

#SPJ11

The complete question is:

(Q019) Following the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States undertook the internment of all people of Japanese ancestry living in the United States. The government stated that this action was to protect national security. Many of those sent to these internment camps were US citizens, with parents or grandparents born in Japan. This action relied on the use of

a. stereotypes.

b. hegemony.

c. culture jamming.

d. sexism.

Frederick Jackson Turner's thesis is considered provocative due to its challenging interpretation of American history and its implications for the understanding of the American frontier.

Frederick Jackson Turner's thesis, presented in his seminal essay "The Significance of the Frontier in American History" in 1893, offers a unique perspective on the development of the United States. The thesis proposes that the existence of an American frontier played a central role in shaping the American character, democracy, and institutions. It argues that the frontier experience fostered individualism, egalitarianism, and a distinct American identity.

One of the reasons Turner's thesis is provocative is because it challenges the prevailing notions of American exceptionalism and the traditional interpretation of American history. His thesis argues that the frontier was the defining factor in American history, rather than external influences or European roots. This challenged the notion that America's development was solely driven by European cultural and political influences. Turner's emphasis on the frontier as a distinct American experience brought attention to the unique aspects of American history and culture.

Turner's thesis also sparked debates and discussions regarding the closing of the American frontier. He argued that with the 1890 census, which declared that the frontier was "closed," a crucial chapter in American history had come to an end. This notion of the frontier's closing generated contemplation about the future direction of American society and its potential impact on American values and institutions. The idea of a closing frontier raised questions about the sustainability of the American spirit and the challenges it might face in a more urban and industrialized society.

Furthermore, Turner's thesis presented a romanticized and nostalgic view of the frontier experience. He described the frontier as a place of freedom, opportunity, and the transformation of individuals. This perspective resonated with many Americans and contributed to the popular imagination of the Wild West and the pioneering spirit. However, critics of Turner's thesis argued that his idealized portrayal overlooked the hardships, conflicts, and inequalities that also characterized the frontier experience.

Moreover, Turner's thesis had significant implications for the study of American history and the field of historiography. It influenced subsequent generations of historians and prompted them to reevaluate the significance of the frontier in shaping American society. His emphasis on the frontier as a formative force led to further research and scholarship on the impact of geographical and environmental factors on historical development.

In summary, Frederick Jackson Turner's thesis is provocative due to its challenge to conventional interpretations of American history, its focus on the frontier as a defining factor, and its implications for the understanding of American values and institutions. The thesis sparked debates, shaped historiography, and continues to generate discussions about the role of the frontier in shaping the American character.

Learn more about interpretation here

https://brainly.com/question/1556261

#SPJ11

Answer:

The boston tea party is one of them

Explanation:

Answer:

The human body reacts readily and in different biological and cultural ways to changing environmental stresses. A wide variety of temperatures and moisture can be acclimatized.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

May I please have brianliest

Answer:

It shows that even if circumstances prevent us from following through on our plans, we must dedicate ourselves to be the best at what we do.

Explanation:

Rachel Carson was a very studious girl and had a strong desire to do her PhD and have her work recognized in the field of biology, which she had a lot of talent and dedication to. However, the financial situation of the family meant that she could not do a doctorate and had to work to help with the financial expenses, however, even so she continued to dedicate herself to her studies and making her voice heard through articles that addressed animal life and the dangers that the whole planet would face if nature were not respected. Her articles were notorious, they became books and made her a great reference in biological works, giving her recognition and appreciation, as she wished.

Kelo v. New London was a case in which the city of New London, Connecticut, attempted to use eminent domain to seize private property for the purpose of economic development.

The Supreme Court's decision in favor of the city was controversial, with some arguing that it violated property rights while others contended that it was necessary for the public good. Those who supported the city's position argued that economic development was a legitimate public use of eminent domain. They also pointed out that the property in question was not being seized for the benefit of a private individual or corporation but rather for the benefit of the community as a whole. Additionally, they argued that the compensation offered to the property owners was fair and just. On the other hand, opponents of the decision argued that it was a violation of property rights and that the government should not be able to seize private property for economic development purposes. They also contended that the compensation offered to the property owners was not sufficient, and that the decision could set a dangerous precedent for future eminent domain cases. In my opinion, the court made the wrong decision in Kelo v. New London. While economic development may be a valid public use of eminent domain, the government's power to seize private property should be used sparingly and only in cases of true necessity. In this case, the property in question was not blighted or otherwise unusable, and the development project was not vital to the community's well-being. Additionally, the compensation offered to the property owners was not enough to make up for the loss of their property and livelihoods. In conclusion, while there may be valid arguments on both sides of the Kelo v. New London case, I believe that the court should have ruled in favor of the property owners and upheld their right to their private property. The government's power to seize private property should be used with great caution and only when absolutely necessary for the public good.

Learn more about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. After the blockade, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev sent a letter to Kennedy. Khrushchev agreed to remove missiles from Cuba if the United States promised not to invade Cuba and to eventually remove missiles from Turkey. Kennedy agreed. ... Khrushchev openly removed missiles from Cuba, ending the Cuban Missile Crisis.

2. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev orders withdrawal of missiles from Cuba, ending the Cuban Missile Crisis. In 1960, Khrushchev had launched plans to install medium and intermediate range ballistic missiles in Cuba that would put the eastern United States within range of nuclear attack.

3. I think that the United States won the war because they agreed to do their goals and their duties to end the war.

The number of countries that have Spanish as their official language is 21. Here is a step-by-step explanation:

1. To determine the number of countries that have Spanish as their official language, we can refer to the media provided or use other reliable sources.
2. According to the media, we can count the countries where Spanish is the official language. Some examples include Spain, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, and Peru.
3. To get an accurate count, let's list down all the countries where Spanish is the official language:
  a. Spain
  b. Mexico
  c. Argentina
  d. Colombia
  e. Peru
  f. Venezuela
  g. Chile
  h. Ecuador
  i. Guatemala
  j. Cuba
  k. Bolivia
  l. Dominican Republic
  m. Honduras
  n. Paraguay
  o. El Salvador
  p. Nicaragua
  q. Costa Rica
  r. Puerto Rico
  s. Panama
  t. Uruguay
  u. Equatorial Guinea
4. Counting the number of countries on the list, we find that there are 21 countries that have Spanish as their official language.
Therefore, there are 21 countries that have Spanish as their official language.

To learn more about Spanish

https://brainly.com/question/26597749

#SPJ11

The number of countries that have Spanish as their official language is 21.

Here is a step-by-step explanation:

1. To determine the number of countries with Spanish as their official language, we can use the provided media.
2. We can start by counting the countries listed in the media that have Spanish as their official language.
3. Looking at the media, we can see that the countries listed include Spain, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Cuba, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Paraguay, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico, Panama, Uruguay, and Equatorial Guinea.
4. Counting these countries, we find that there are 21 countries listed in the media that have Spanish as their official language.
5. Therefore, the direct answer to the question is that there are 21 countries with Spanish as their official language.

To know more about  Dominican Republic,visit:

brainly.com/question/30604211

#SPJ11

Answer:

D. Business owners made profits and benefited from new industrial

technologies, while laborers were poorly paid and had limited

access to new products.

A. Cam should look for reliable outside sources to confirm the statistics in the infographic.

For more such questions on infographic, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/16399505

#SPJ8

Answer:Constitutional Amendments – Amendment 24 – “Elimination of Poll Taxes” Amendment Twenty-four to the Constitution was ratified on January 23, 1964. It abolished and forbids the federal and state governments from imposing taxes on voters during federal elections.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution was a major event in world history and had a profound effect on societies around the world. In particular, the Industrial Revolution impacted the lives of working class people and the children of industrial societies. Child labor was a common feature in industrial societies as children as young as four years old were often employed in the factories and mines that developed during the time.

Answer:

It is important because it provides information about ancient Sumerian history and the history of humanity as a whole.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is C.) decrease in the political power of the Sun Belt.

Explanation:

Answer:

The question was a bit confusing so I'm just going to write the answer

Explanation:

Matter can change form through physical and chemical changes, but through any of these changes matter is conserved. The same amount of matter exists before and after the change—none is created or destroyed.

Answer:

Due to the industrialization in the American northeast, removal of large tracts of trees were done. there was huge destruction of natural resources. there were no rules and regulations regarding the destruction of trees. so there is no restrictions as far as cutting down trees were concerned.

Explanation:

Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST!!!!

Yes, housing in factories to produce war supplies was equally important during World War II.

The war effort required a significant increase in production of weapons, vehicles, and other supplies. To meet this demand, factories needed to operate at maximum capacity with 24-hour production shifts. As a result, many workers were required to live in housing provided by the factories or nearby government-sponsored communities. This allowed for easy access to the factories and minimized travel time, enabling workers to contribute more effectively to the war effort.

During World War II, housing was a critical factor in the production of war supplies. The war effort required massive amounts of weapons, ammunition, vehicles, and other supplies to be produced quickly and efficiently. To meet this demand, factories had to operate at maximum capacity, often with 24-hour production shifts. Many workers were required to live in housing provided by the factories or in nearby government-sponsored communities. This housing was often located close to the factories, allowing workers to minimize their travel time and maximize their production time. The housing was also designed to provide a safe and comfortable living environment for workers, with amenities such as electricity, running water, and heating. The housing provided by factories was often temporary, consisting of basic dormitory-style accommodations. These were meant to be affordable and convenient for workers, allowing them to focus on their work and contribute to the war effort. In some cases, workers were even encouraged to bring their families to live in the factory-provided housing.

To know more about housing visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9433734

#SPJ11

The drought of 1977 resulted in a reduction in the size of the seeds on Daphne Island, which had a significant impact on the feeding behavior of the finches.

The finches had to adjust their diet to cope with the changes caused by the drought.The drought caused a severe reduction in vegetation growth, and consequently, there were fewer large, easily accessible seeds for the finches to feed on. As a result, the finches had to adapt by eating smaller and harder seeds that were more difficult to crack open and required more energy to consume.

This change in diet placed a greater demand on the finches, resulting in the survival of only the birds with the most efficient beaks that were capable of extracting nutrients from the smaller and harder seeds.The drought of 1977 on Daphne Island is a perfect example of how changing environmental conditions can have significant effects on the feeding behavior of finches and how they must adapt to survive.

Learn more about drought Visit: brainly.com/question/6818677

#SPJ11

The general purpose why are the superstates fighting is for the possession of the slave labor (coolies) and resources of the undeveloped territories.

The superstates can be defined as the united of several small states to formed powerful and large states by federation or union or hybrid form.

The superstates were formed to create superpower territories and can influence other states. The purpose to create the superpower territories is to give them access to possession the slave labor and also to possess resources from other states, especially from undeveloped territories.

So, why superstates fighting is for possession of the slave labor and resources of undeveloped territories in warfare in 1984.

Learn more about superstates here:

brainly.com/question/29024970

#SPJ4

This week I have learned a lot about the history of the United States. One of the most important and interesting pieces of US history I have learned this week is the Emancipation Proclamation.

It was a presidential proclamation and executive order issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, during the American Civil War. The order granted freedom to more than 3 million enslaved people in the Confederate states, which were still in rebellion against the United States.

It did not free slaves in the Union states, nor did it free slaves in some Confederate states that were already occupied by Union forces. Despite these limitations, the Emancipation Proclamation was a significant moment in American history because it marked the first time that slavery was officially abolished in the United States.

To know more about history visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3583505

#SPJ11

Answer:

general

Explanation:

Answer:

Give that guys brainliest lol ^^

Explanation:

The answer is that it is unclear what percentage of households in the world had internet access in 2018. However, according to your second piece of information, about 10 percent of households in Africa had internet access.

It is important to note that internet access varies greatly depending on the region and country. While some areas have widespread access, others may have limited or no access at all. Additionally, the definition of "internet access" may also vary, as some households may have access but at slower speeds or limited data usage.

Regarding the third piece of information you provided, it is significant that households with internet access grew by more than 30 percent between 2008 and 2018. This suggests that there has been an increase in the availability and affordability of internet access, which can have a positive impact on education, communication, and economic opportunities.

To learn more about internet access visit:

brainly.com/question/12882827

#SPJ11

Based on the archeological analysis, it has been concluded that the form of fossils is most helpful to archaeologists, those formed in sediment or those that are preserved because it allows us to see how they were before they died and what they look like before they died.

Fossil is an archeological term that is used to describe the preserved remains of plants and animals whose bodies were concealed in sediments, such as sand and mud, under ancient seas, lakes, and rivers.

Generally, the term fossils are also used to describe any preserved trace of life that is typically more than 10,000 years old.

One of the major reasons why fossils are considered most helpful to archaeologists when formed in sediment or those that are preserved is because it allows archeologists to see how the creatures were when they died, and in the case of preserved fossils, archeologists would see what the creatures look like before they even died.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that fossils formed through sediment and preservation are both vital to the work of archaeologists.

Learn more about Fossil here: https://brainly.com/question/11829803

#SPJ1

Answer:

From the 1600s to the mid 1800s, Japan isolated itself from outside influences, and limited both its trade and relations with other nations under what is called the sakoku policy, which is sometimes also called the “period of national isolation”.

Explanation:

Answer:

An arms race occurs when two or more countries increase the size and quality of military resources to gain military and political superiority over one another. The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union is perhaps the largest and most expensive arms race in history; however, others have occurred, often with dire consequences. Whether an arms race increases or decreases the risk of war remains debatable: some analysts agree with Sir Edward Grey, Britain's foreign secretary at the start of World War I, who stated "The moral is obvious; it is that great armaments lead inevitably to war."

Explanation:

With the Industrial Revolution came new weaponry, including vastly improved warships. In the late nineteenth century, France and Russia built powerful armies and challenged the spread of British colonialism. In response, Britain shored up its Royal Navy to control the seas.

Britain managed to work out its arms race with France and Russia with two separate treaties. But Germany had also drastically increased its military budget and might and built a large navy to contest Britain’s naval dominance in hopes of becoming a world power.

In turn, Britain further expanded the Royal Navy and built more advanced and powerful battlecruisers, including the 1906 HMS Dreadnought, a technically advanced type of warship that set the standard for naval architecture.

Not to be outdone, Germany produced its own fleet of dreadnought class warships, and the standoff continued with both sides fearing a naval attack from the other and building bigger and better ships.

Germany couldn’t keep up, however, and Britain won the so-called Anglo-German Arms Race. The conflict didn’t cause World War I, but it did help to increase distrust and tensions between Germany, Britain and other European powers.

Answer:

The Emancipation Proclamation changed the meaning and purpose of the Civil War. The war was no longer just about preserving the Union— it was also about freeing the slaves. Foreign powers such as Britain and France lost their enthusiasm for supporting the Confederacy.

Explanation: