Answers
The Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. Sandford was issued on Walk 6, 1857. Delivered by Boss Equity Roger Taney, this assessment declared that slaves were not residents of the United States and could not sue in Federal courts.
Dred Scott was the name of an African-American slave. He was taken by his lord, an official in the U.S. Armed force, from the slave province of Missouri to the free territory of Illinois and then, at that point, to the free domain of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for an extensive stretch of time.
At the point when the Military ordered his lord to return to Missouri, he returned Scott with him to that slave state, where his lord died. In 1846, Scott was helped by Abolitionist (abolitionist slavery) legal counselors to sue for his freedom in court, guaranteeing he should be free since he had lived on free soil for quite a while. The case went the whole way to the United States Supreme Court. The Main Equity of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland.
In Spring of 1857, Scott lost the decision as seven out of nine Judges on the Supreme Court declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. resident, or at any point had been a U.S. resident. As a non-resident, the court stated, Scott had no freedoms and could not sue in a Federal Court and should stay a slave.
Around then there were almost 4 million slaves in America. The court's decision affected the situation with each enslaved and free African-American in the United States. The decision served to return to some time in the past concerning the freedoms of African-Americans, overlooking the way that people of color in five of the first States had been full democratic residents dating back to the Declaration of Independence in 1776.
The Supreme Court likewise ruled that Congress could not stop slavery in the recently arising regions and declared the Missouri Split the difference of 1820 to be illegal. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery north of the equal 36°30' in the Louisiana Buy. The Court declared it violated the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution which disallows Congress from depriving people of their property without due course of regulation.
to know more about the supreme court click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What shooting position is commonly used when hunting with a shotgun?
Answers
Answer:
standing position . I found it when I searched it on flashcards (: I love that website !
Answer:
Standing position
Explanation:
I did the test and got it right. Also, if you're able to, give the other person brainliest please!
a loss occurs when an individual breaks into a safe and leaves visible signs of forcible entry best describes
Answers
Burglary is defined as a forced entry into or exit from an insured's property with the purpose of stealing the insured's property. Forced entry or exit must be clearly visible.
Should a person be returned to their previous financial situation when a loss occurs?Indemnity, A common legal rule relating to insurance that states that the person receiving benefits under an insurance policy should be put back in roughly the same financial situation as before the loss.
A loss sustained form is what?These forms are preferred because under a "loss discovered" form, regardless of when the act or loss occurred, coverage is applied to losses that are discovered during the policy period. • When a loss is really experienced, coverage is applied using a "loss sustained" form.
To know more about Loss occurs visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20526582
#SPJ9
The complete question is below:-
A loss that occurs when an individual breaks into a safe and leaves visible signs of forcible entry best describes
a. Burglary
b. Robbery
c. Mysterious disappearance
d. Larceny
The E-SIGN Act allows for:
Answers
Answer: down there
Explanation:
The E-Sign Act allows the use of electronic records to satisfy any statute, regulation, or rule of law requiring that such information be provided in writing, if the consumer has affirmatively consented to such use and has not withdrawn such consent.
if a subject is charged with a felony, what are the pretrial stages that he/she must go through, in order?
Answers
When a subject is charged with a felony, they go through several pretrial stages in a specific order. These stages include initial appearance, bail determination, preliminary hearing, arraignment, plea bargaining, and pretrial motions.
The pretrial stages that a subject charged with a felony must go through typically follow a specific sequence. The initial appearance is the first stage, where the defendant is informed of the charges and their rights, and bail is set. The next stage is the bail determination, where the court determines whether the defendant will be released on bail or held in custody pending trial. Following that is the preliminary hearing, where the court evaluates the evidence to determine if there is sufficient probable cause to proceed with a trial. The arraignment stage involves the defendant entering a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest) to the charges. Plea bargaining may occur next, where negotiations take place between the prosecution and defense to potentially reach a plea agreement. Lastly, pretrial motions are filed by the defense or prosecution to address legal issues or seek specific actions before the trial begins. These pretrial stages are essential in ensuring a fair and efficient criminal justice process.
To learn more about felony, refer:
brainly.com/question/14204512
#SPJ11
can a 14 year old have a fishing license in Kentucky
Answers
Answer : Resident and nonresident children under the age of 16 are allowed to fish without a license .
Hoped I helped-
P.S - You might want to double check though -
Sleepy~
Who was Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca? A. He funded the Nárvaez expedition. B. He started a revolt against Nárvaez which lead to his death. C. He lead an expedition to find the cities of gold. D. He was one of the few survivors in the Nárvaez expedition. Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answers
Answer:
D. He was one of the few survivors in the Nárvaez expedition.
Explanation:
Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca was a Spanish explorer. He was on board the ship that would send out Narváex in 1527. This expedition was made by Spaniards who wished to explore and establish colonies in America. The trip was exhausting and traumatizing since there were countless deaths, where only 4 people survived, including this Cabeza de Vaca that landed where today the city of Mexico is located.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Answers
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
Do you think a position in law enforcement should require a college degree? Is a law enforcement officer better equipped to do their job if they are more educated? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
no. I think taking like a certain test at least get an idea of how you think and how quick you can react to danger and panic is important but for a job like law enforcement I think you just need training in Behavior and basic things like how to use a gun and what to do if your under attack or something's wrong with a child things that take more than just reading a book, you need actual experience
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answers
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
2.4 Which department/organization would you approach if your human rights have been
violated?
(2)
Answers
Answer:
The human rights commission.
Explanation:
The human rights commission is the organisation or department to approach if the human rights had been violated. A human rights commission, also known as a human relations commission, is a body set up to investigate, promote or protect human rights.
Past or present racist heath care laws?
Answers
aubrey is working at an agency in which the counselors develop and review treatment plans in conjunction with client input. this is considered a violation of which ethics code?
Answers
The correct answer is To preserve the worth and welfare of clients, ethics codes offer counsellors with professional standards.
All counsellors are urged to base their work on the fundamental elements of the therapeutic process associated with the client-centered approach to counselling, especially those who struggle with a contradiction between their own beliefs and ethical principles (Raskin &... Teachers' major duties to their pupils are outlined in a professional code of ethics, which also describes their place in a student's life. In the classroom, whether it be online or in person, as well as in their interactions with parents and coworkers, educators must exhibit objectivity, honesty, and ethical behaviour.
To learn more about counsellors click the link below:
brainly.com/question/28585992
#SPJ4
The major differences between the House and the Senate include all of the following EXCEPTA. the length of their terms. B. the size of the institutions. C. the method of determining their constituencies. D. their role in the impeachment process. E. their power in the legislative process.
Answers
The correct answer is Option D. The major differences between the House and the Senate include all of the following EXCEPT their role in the impeachment process.
The House and the Senate have different roles in the impeachment process. The House has the sole power to initiate impeachment proceedings by bringing charges against a federal official, while the Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials and ultimately decide whether to remove an impeached official from office. The other differences between the two chambers include the length of their terms, the size of the institutions, the method of determining their constituencies, and their power in the legislative process. The House has a two-year term, while Senators serve for six years. The House has 435 voting members, while the Senate has 100. The House is apportioned by population, while the Senate has two Senators per state. In the legislative process, the House has the exclusive power to initiate revenue bills, while the Senate has the exclusive power to approve presidential nominations and treaties.
Know more about the House here:
https://brainly.com/question/1751632
#SPJ11
how does female-dominated society lead bonobos to deal with conflict?
Answers
Bonobos are a unique species of primates that inhabit the dense forests of the Congo Basin in Africa. They are known for their peaceful and non-violent behavior, which is in stark contrast to the aggressive and competitive behavior exhibited by other primate species like chimpanzees.
One of the key factors that contribute to this peaceful behavior is the fact that bonobo societies are largely female-dominated.
In bonobo society, females hold the key positions of power and influence, which means that they are responsible for resolving conflicts and maintaining social order. This is in contrast to male-dominated societies, where aggression and violence are often used to establish dominance and control. Female bonobos are also known for their strong social bonds and cooperative behavior, which allows them to work together to solve problems and defuse tensions.
The importance of female dominance in bonobo society is highlighted by the fact that conflict resolution strategies are largely based on social bonding and reconciliation rather than aggression and violence. For example, when two bonobos have a conflict, they will often engage in sexual behavior or grooming to reconcile and reaffirm their social bonds. This behavior helps to maintain a peaceful and harmonious social environment, which is essential for the survival of the species.
In summary, the female-dominated society of bonobos plays a crucial role in shaping their behavior and conflict resolution strategies. Through their strong social bonds and cooperative behavior, female bonobos are able to maintain a peaceful and harmonious social environment, which is essential for their survival.
To know more about Bonobos visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27985084
#SPJ11
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
Answers
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
What is center for court innovation ?
Answers
The Center for Court Innovation can be regarded as a body that helps in creation of an effective center of serving human justice by the design and implementation of programs being operated by the members involved thereunder.
The Center for Court Innovation is a legally accepted justice system wherein the courts are being replaced for the serving justice in a fast and effective way. This body has the primary intention to remove the discrepancies of the official legal bodies that operate at the local and state levels.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/30471339
#SPJ4
The Center for Court Innovation seeks to help create a more effective and humane justice system by designing and implementing operating programs, performing original research, and providing reformers around the world with the tools they need to launch new strategies.
if you poop your pants at the lowest gravity possible it would float?
Apple or bark tree?
Answers
T/F; jails have limited information about inmates
Answers
False. Jails have a significant amount of information about their inmates, and are required to maintain detailed records in order to properly manage and care for them.
Jails are facilities designed to hold individuals who have been arrested and are awaiting trial or sentencing. They are operated by local government agencies, such as county sheriff's departments, and are usually meant to hold inmates for short periods of time, typically less than one year.
Despite their temporary nature, jails are required to maintain detailed records about the individuals in their custody. This includes information such as the inmate's name, age, race, gender, arrest date, charges, and booking photo. Additionally, jails may collect other data points, such as medical history, mental health status, and disciplinary records, in order to properly manage and care for the inmate population.
While there may be limitations to the amount or type of information that jails can collect or share, particularly when it comes to protecting an inmate's privacy rights, it is inaccurate to say that jails have limited information about their inmates. In fact, jails are expected to maintain accurate and up-to-date records in order to ensure the safety and well-being of both the inmates and the staff who work in these facilities.
Know more about Inmates here:
https://brainly.com/question/13055705
#SPJ11
What is the environmental impact assessment act, and its
benefits? (please answer in a detailed non- plagiarized answer
)
Answers
The Environmental Impact Assessment Act evaluates and manages the environmental impacts of proposed projects, promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
A framework for assessing and managing the potential environmental effects of proposed projects or activities is established by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Its main advantages include promoting sustainable development by taking into account social, economic and environmental factors, protecting the environment by identifying and mitigating negative effects and facilitating public participation in decision making processes.
The act promotes project enhancements and modifications, ensures adherence to environmental regulations and provides comprehensive information on environmental impacts to enable informed decision making. The EIA Act promotes more environmentally conscious and sustainable development, ecosystem protection and a balance between development and conservation by incorporating environmental factors into project planning.
Learn more about Environmental Impact Assessment Act. at:
brainly.com/question/33015812
#SPJ4
Identify and describe 3 procedural problems in the scenario.
Discuss what the police officer could have done for each to make the procedure proper.
Be sure to use relevant resources and case law to support your thoughts.
On January 10, 2020, at approximately 1:00 a.m., a 14 year old male Tom Jones was stopped and arrested by the local police for being in possession of a stolen bicycle. The bicycle was easily recognizable as being stolen in the same neighborhood because one of the arresting officers (there were four officers involved), Bill Craven, took the initial stolen bicycle report about a week earlier. The bicycle was a $4,000 red and black carbon framed 18 speed Specialized bicycle. Officer Craven examined the bicycle and observed that the serial number had been obliterated. Additionally, Officer Craven had personal knowledge that there had been four other high valued bicycles stolen within the last month in the same neighborhood.
When the stop was made, Tom was immediately recognized as a juvenile and asked where he lived. Tom stated he lived with his 80 year old grandmother in a nearby townhome complex. Tom was placed in custody (along with the bike) and transported to his grandmother's home. Officer Craven (with the other three officers present), knocked on the door until grandmother responded. The officers identified themselves and advised her why her grandson had been arrested. She indicated that she understood.
Officer Craven then told her that several other similarly expensive bikes have been stolen recently and that he would like to search her apartment for any other stolen bicycles. Officer Craven was assertive in his manner of speaking but not overly commanding. At first, grandmother hesitated but then gave permission for all four of the officers to enter and search.
The officers searched the entire apartment, including each room, patio, outside backyard area and storage areas. This included under each bed, every closet and the bathroom area. While searching, one of the assisting officers told Craven he had found some marijuana in Tom's room which had been in a shoe box in Tom's bedroom closet. Officer Craven advised grandmother that Tom would be charged with possession of marijuana as well as with theft of the bicycle. The officers left the townhome at about 4:00 a.m.
At around 7:00 a.m., Officer Craven returned to grandmother's residence and asked for permission to search further. Grandmother inquired for what purpose? Craven told her that he wanted to look for additional narcotics. Grandmother told him, "sure, I guess." Craven had been searching when grandmother's niece, who also lives in the townhome and had been working the nightshift at a local hospital, demanded that Officer Craven leave the home. Craven stopped searching but told the niece he would be back with a search warrant.
Answers
Three procedural problems in the scenario are lack of probable cause for search, inadequate consent for search, and lack of search warrant.
In the first instance, when Officer Craven requested permission to search the grandmother's apartment for other stolen bicycles, there was lack of probable cause. Secondly, inadequate consent was obtained from the grandmother. Although she initially granted permission for the officers to enter and search, her hesitance suggests a lack of clear and voluntary consent. Lastly, lack of a search warrant is a significant procedural problem. According to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, searches and seizures must be supported by probable cause and conducted with a warrant, unless an exception applies. The scenario described does not appear to meet the requirements for a warrantless search based on consent or probable cause.
The case law surrounding search and seizure, such as the landmark decision in Katz v. United States (1967), emphasizes the importance of protecting individuals' privacy rights and requiring adherence to proper procedures in law enforcement actions.
To know more about Fourth Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7955252
#SPJ11
Are Narcotics addictive
Answers
Answer:
yes very much so
Explanation:
dont do any
Arthur Fairchild is accused of breaking into a top secret military installation and tampering with the records. Fairchild claims that at the time of the break-in he was with some friends smoking marijuana. Because that is against the law, his friends do not want to testify on his behalf. Will they have to?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
as law, starting March 1, 2010 anyone age
first driver license in the State of Texas must complete an approved driver education course.
O14-16
O16-18
O18-24
ONone of the above
Answers
If you want to pass a slow moving vehicle you should do what
Answers
Answer:
As long as you're passing in a legal manner either in a passing zone read below.
Explanation:
Use your turn signal to let other drives know you are changing lanes.Check your side and rearview mirrors for traffic approaching from behind.Glance over your left shoulder if you are moving left. Glance over your right shoulder if you are moving right so you can see if there are any vehicles in your blind spot.(passing on a one lane road is completely different but you did not say which you were referring to)
Which was a compromise between northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention?
Answers
Agreement achieved with in United States Transitional Government (1787) by representatives as from Northern and Southern states who multipled the slave population is known as the "three-fifths compromise."
Which issue was at the heart of one of the concessions struck by northern and southern states in during 1787 Constitutional Convention?Its 1787 Constitutional Convention saw a contentious dispute between states that wanted community number of representatives and others who demanded equal representation, which led to the creation of The Great Compromise.
Why did compromise between the North and the South become impossible by 1860?The Senate rejected the convention's recommendations by a vote of 28 to 7. Early in 1861, efforts to reach a settlement failed because doing so would have required its Conservative Movement to renounce its foundational tenet—the opposition to the spread of slavery into the west.
To know more about Northern and Southern states Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14079520
#SPJ1
What does the Tenth Amendment say about delegated and reserved powers?
Answers
What does Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation mean?
Answers
Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation outlines the relationship between the states and their citizens, as well as the relationship between the states themselves.
Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation, which was the first constitution of the United States, established the idea of a "firm league of friendship" among the states. It states that the states shall guarantee to every person in their jurisdiction the free exercise of religious worship and freedom of speech, and that the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. This article was an attempt to ensure that individual rights were protected and that there was mutual respect between the states.
learn more about Article 4 here:
brainly.com/question/14399066
#SPJ4
Drag each tile to the correct definition.
Tiles
law
policy
political authority
sovereignty
Pairs
Tiles
Pairs
basic principles of behavior
a rule that regulates actions
and behavior
-
the right to be free from
outside influence
-
-
the power to pass and enforce
laws
MacBook Air
Answers
Law is a system of rules created and enforced to regulate actions and behavior.
Policy is a basic principles of behavior.
Political authority is the power to pass and enforce laws.
Sovereignty is the right to be free from outside influence.
What is law?Law is a system of rules created and enforced to regulate actions and behavior.
Policy is a basic principles of behavior. Policy is a principle of action.
Political authority is the power to pass and enforce laws. Political authority claims the obedience to its rules.
Sovereignty is the right to be free from outside influence. Sovereignty refers to dominant power or supreme authority.
Find out more on law at: https://brainly.com/question/1091566
T/F : While the notion of "human rights" is based on Western conceptions of "natural law," opponents of human rights also reject this Western political tradition.
Answers
True. The statement is true. The notion of "human rights" is often associated with Western conceptions of "natural law," opponents of human rights can come from various backgrounds and may reject this Western tradition.
The rejection of human rights can stem from cultural, religious, or ideological reasons, and it is not exclusive to those who oppose Western political traditions. In some cases, opponents may argue that human rights are a product of Western imperialism or cultural hegemony and therefore should not be universally applied.
They may advocate for alternative frameworks or emphasize the importance of communal or collective rights over individual rights. It is important to recognize that the discourse around human rights is complex and can involve diverse perspectives and critiques from different parts of the world.
Learn more about imperialism here : brainly.com/question/30210572
#SPJ11