After researching the arguments for and against the Electoral College, here are the most convincing arguments for both sides:
Arguments for the Electoral College:
The Electoral College ensures that smaller states have a voice in the election, as they would be largely ignored in a popular vote system.The Electoral College encourages candidates to campaign in a wide range of states, instead of just focusing on densely populated areas.The Electoral College helps to prevent election disputes and recounts, as the winner of each state's electoral votes is usually clear.What is the Electoral College about?Arguments for the Electoral College:
Protecting minority interests: The Electoral College ensures that small states and less populated areas have a voice in the election process. Without it, candidates would focus on heavily populated areas and neglect the needs of rural communities. Maintaining stability: The Electoral College has been used in every presidential election since the country's founding. This consistency provides stability and continuity in the election process, preventing the chaos that could result from sudden changes.Therefore, Arguments against the Electoral College:
The Electoral College can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote, which undermines the principle of democracy.The Electoral College can discourage voter turnout, especially in states that are heavily dominated by one political party.In terms of the positions of the magazines, TIME Magazine seems to be against the Electoral College, as the article title suggests that common arguments for preserving it are wrong. Real Clear Politics appears to be in favor of the Electoral College, as the article argues for its necessity. PBS NewsHour presents a proposal for a popular vote system, suggesting that they are at least open to the idea of moving away from the Electoral College.
Read more about Electoral College here:
https://brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1
Write a short essay on why you want a career in public safety and communications . specifically a 911 dispatcher
Instruction
Active
Petitioning and Influencing the Government
Use the drop-down menus to complete the statements.
The
Amendment protects the right of individuals and groups to petition the US government.
People with particular economic or political concerns often form
their behalf.
to influence lawmakers to act on
Powerful and influential groups called
committees finance campaigns and other political interests.
candidate.
cannot contribute directly to a politician's campaign, but they can pay for in advertising in support of a
"Dark money" is defined as contributions to political candidates and groups from
v
Interest groups, political action, Super pacs, and individuals whose names are unknown come first.
The Amendment safeguards the freedom of people and Interest groups to petition the US government.
Interest circles
People with specific political or economic concerns frequently organize to persuade legislators to act in their favor.
Action on Politics
A politician's campaign cannot accept direct contributions from powerful committees or other political Interest groups, although they are allowed to spend money on advertising in support of a candidate.
A super PAC
Contributions to political politicians and parties from unreported sources are known as "dark money."
people who prefer to remain anonymous.
The Interest Groups
This is a reference to the people who band together to form a single group.
Learn more about Interest groups here
https://brainly.com/question/14486619
#SPJ9
Scenario
Like any big city, Los Angeles has to deal with illegal drugs. Of course, many of those drugs come from outside the city. Some drugs come over the border from Mexico. Some are manufactured in illegal labs around the United States. Within California, growers have hidden illegal marijuana farms in state and national parks. The Los Angeles Police Department can target drug problems within the city. However, they don’t have the jurisdiction or resources to stop the influx of drugs from outside the city.
What agencies might the Los Angeles police want to collaborate with to address these problems? What barriers might make this collaboration difficult?
Answer:
drug prevention or the fbi
Explanation:
drug prevention is for the prevention and also wanting to adress something thst has to do with drugs.The fbi already has your informaiton that is top secret so they can track where it started and where it comes from within a week.
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
Please help with this question
Answer:
It's Clay
Explanation:
Investigating careers. Answer quick, 80 points.
One of the main issues pre-school teachers face is helping kids do which of the following?
A. be away from their parents
B. learn a different language
C. pass standardized tests
D. graduate pre-school
Answer:
Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.
The U.S. House of Representatives is part of the executive branch of the federal government.
True False
Answer: False
Explanation:
It is part of the legislative branch
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If you ever get confused about the U.S. government, just remember this simple rhyme: The House and the Senate make the laws, the President and the Cabinet enforce them with their claws. The House is part of Congress, not the executive, that would be nonsense. The Congress controls the money and the bills, the executive deals with foreign ills. So don't mix up the branches or you'll get a scolding, they have different functions and different roles for upholding.
All Jokes aside.... And all rhymes aside....Here is the serious version....
(Though that should be a song o(≧▽≦)o ) ....
The U.S. House of Representatives is one of the two chambers that make up the legislative branch of the federal government, along with the Senate. The legislative branch has the power to create and pass laws, as well as to control the federal spending. The executive branch, on the other hand, is composed of the President, the Vice President, and the Cabinet members. The executive branch has the power to execute and enforce laws, as well as to conduct foreign relations.
What are the pros and cons of the routine activity theory
Answer:
The routine activity theory is a sociological theory that explains crime as a function of the presence of motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardians. The theory posits that crime occurs when these three elements come together in time and space, and the lack of capable guardianship allows the motivated offender to act on their desires.
Pros:
Simple and intuitive: The routine activity theory is easy to understand and applies to a wide range of criminal activities.Emphasizes the role of the environment: The theory recognizes the role of the physical and social environment in shaping criminal behavior, which can help inform crime prevention and reduction efforts.Focuses on opportunities: The routine activity theory places emphasis on the opportunities for crime that are created by the interactions between motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardianship.Cons:
Limited scope: The routine activity theory focuses primarily on property crime and may not be applicable to all forms of criminal behavior.Simplistic explanation: The theory oversimplifies the complex nature of crime by reducing it to a single factor, the presence of motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardianship.Overlooks individual differences: The routine activity theory does not account for individual differences in motivation and criminal behavior, which can play a significant role in shaping criminal activity.Ignores cultural and historical factors: The theory does not consider the role of cultural and historical factors in shaping crime patterns and behavior, which can lead to oversimplification and a narrow understanding of crime.How will the decision in this case affect future conduct by police officers?
Police officers must constantly be able to function under stress, remain composed, and use good judgment and decision-making abilities as necessary.
What is decision-making?In psychology, choosing a belief or a plan of action from among multiple potential alternative possibilities is considered to be the product of a cognitive process. It could be unreasonable or rational, depending.
The process of creating decisions is a form of reasoning that is predicated on the values, preferences, and beliefs of the decision-maker. Every process of decision-making results in a final conclusion, which may or may not lead to action.
In particular in European psychology research, research on problem-solving is published alongside research on decision-making.
Making decisions can be seen as a problem-solving process that results in an optimal, or at least acceptable, answer. Consequently, it is a process that might be more or less reasonable or irrational and that can be founded on overt or covert facts and ideas.
Learn more about decision-making, here
https://brainly.com/question/16407152
#SPJ1
CORRECT IS BRAINLIEST
what is popular sovereingty?
Popular sovereignty refers to the principle that ultimate political power resides with the people, who have the authority to govern themselves.
Popular sovereignty is the principle that political power rests with the people. It asserts that the government's authority is derived from the consent and will of the governed.
In this concept, citizens have the right to participate in decision-making, including electing representatives and voting on important matters.
Popular sovereignty is closely associated with democracy, where the legitimacy and actions of the government depend on the support and involvement of the people. It emphasizes that the government should serve the interests and needs of the citizens.
Overall, popular sovereignty refers to the principle that ultimate political power resides with the people, who have the authority to govern themselves.
To learn more about sovereignty:
brainly.com/question/28254648
Answer:
Popular sovereignty is government based on consent of the people. The government's source of authority is the people, and its power is not legitimate if it disregards the will of the people. Government established by free choice of the people is expected to serve the people, who have sovereignty, or supreme power.
In the criminal justice system the two main categories of law are
Answer:
Criminal nd Civil!
Explanation:
If you need an explanation of what they are nd what they each mean lmk!
What is the impact of incorporation?
a The Supreme Court has included local court judges to help rule on certain cases..
b The Supreme Court has applied certain rights from the Bill of Rights to the state governments.
c The Supreme Court has requested that appeals lawyers combine similar cases into one review.
d The Supreme Court has determined that its rulings will only apply to the state in which the case began.
Examples of public servants that are not civil servants
The Examples of public servants that are not civil servants are those who are firefighters and police officers.
Do all public employees work as civil servants?Members of the government, employees of various government agencies, as well as personnel in embassies and consulates all fall under the category of civil servants. Firefighters, police officers, as well as volunteers and privates who help the less fortunate members of society are all examples of public servants.
Note that Employees in the public sector, including those working in the NHS and education, are not regarded as civil servants. Police personnel and officers are not considered civil servants.
Therefore, Firefighters and police officers are examples of public servants, but so are volunteers and privates who provide services to the community and the most vulnerable members of society.
Learn more about public servants from
https://brainly.com/question/20296498
#SPJ1
"Genericide" applies to ______
trademarks
patents
TRADEMARKS
☞EXPLANATION☜Trademark Genericide can be defined as the loss of trademark rights when a term enters common usage and consumers begin to denote a particular product than its source. When a trademark becomes the "common descriptive name" of a certain product, the trademark owner will no longer have an exclusive right to its use.9 Jun
Answer:
trademarks
Explanation:
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Is it enough to be "suspected" of terrorism, or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?
Answer:
Suspects must have a trial before being detained indefinitely.
Explanation:
Suspects of terrorism must be detained immediately, as a measure of security and disaster prevention, since terrorist acts tend to be gradual and involve causing terror and deaths in the population.
However, in order for this suspect to be detained indefinitely, there needs to be a fair trial where evidence will be analyzed that places this suspect as guilty or innocent, making his arrest or freedom justified.
Answer:
Well, obviously the cops would need some sort of reason to arrest these people before detaining them, not just because they may seem “suspicious”. I do believe that they must have a fair trial before being detained permanently because the police may not have any sort of theory or evidence just suspicion and that is not enough.
Explanation:
Is there a law against creating/spreading fake news in the UK?
Yes, there is ....... many of them .....
Follow me
Mark as Brainliest
Answer:
yes?
( i don't know the law name though )
Explanation:
spreading fake news is kinda against the law since news is very important and it shares important things in the world and spreading fake news is like telling lies to the whole wide world and i think you will need to go to the Supreme Court for doing that.
When a school bus stops to unload children on a divided highway with no median, vehicles traveling in the
same direction as the bus must
Keep moving at the normal speed of traffic.
Slow down and proceed with caution.
Stop until the stop signal on the bus is withdrawn.
Answer:
Stop until the stop signal on the bus is withdrawn.
Explanation:
On all undivided highways (without a median), traffic in both directions must stop at least 20 feet from a stopped school bus that has its red lights flashing. You must not pass the bus until the lights are turned off or the bus starts moving. You should always remember that the stop sign and flashing lights on the bus is always treated as a stop sign.
Sometimes people mistakenly say that the body of a murder victim provides the corpus delicti of the crime of murder. What actually constitutes the corpus delicti of murder?
"Sea otters are on the endangered species list due to over-hunting for their beautiful fur."
Answer:
Many schools in Vermont are closed due to heavy snow, sleet, and rain- meteorologist.
Black holes are a small sphere of densely packed matter - astronomer.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliestSea otters are on the endangered species list due to over-hunting for their beautiful fur - oceanographer. Although this to me is not entirely correct as oceanographers are more concerned with physical processes of oceans. A better answer for this would be 'biologist' or 'marine biologist'.
A dinosaur mummy was found with much of its tissues and bones still encased - geologist. Although it is highly unlikely that a mummified dinosaur could be found.
Many schools in Vermont are closed due to heavy snow, sleet, and rain- meteorologist.
Black holes are a small sphere of densely packed matter - astronomer.
fill in the blanks please
1. The basis for a divorce is irreconcilable differences.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of best interests of the child.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se and not pay legal fees.
1. The basis for a collaborative divorce is the mutual agreement between the divorcing parties to work together in resolving their issues amicably and without litigation.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of the best interests of the child, considering factors such as the child's welfare, stability, and relationship with each parent.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony by facilitating communication, negotiation, and finding mutually agreeable solutions.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage by providing therapy, counseling, and guidance to improve communication, understanding, and relationship dynamics.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family, where both partners bring their own children from previous relationships into the new family unit.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se, meaning they represent themselves in the legal process, without hiring an attorney. This option allows them to save on legal fees but requires them to navigate the legal proceedings and paperwork on their own.
Know more about the judge here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:
Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct answer from the list below. Some terms be used more than once.
1 alimony
2 best interests of the child
3 blended family
4 child custody
5 child support
6 collaborative divorce
7 community property
8 covenant divorce
9 divorce
10 in loco parentis
11 irreconcilable differences
12-joint custody
13 kinship care
14 legal fees
15 marriage counselor
16 mediator
17 no-fault divorce
18 pro se
19 property division
20 separate property
21 Separation
22 stepparent
23 tender years doctrine
1. The basis for a ____ is ____
2. When a judge decides the issue of _____ the judge uses the standard of _____
3. A _____ helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of ___, ___, ____ and ____
4. A ____ helps married couples resolve the problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a _______
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go _____ and not pay_____ .
In order for an appellate court to hear an appeal from a trial court, there must be
a claim that what happened at the trial court?
Answer: An appeal is available if, after a trial in the U.S. District Court, the losing side has issues with the trial court proceedings, the law that was applied, or how the law was applied. Generally, on these grounds, litigants have the right to an appellate court review of the trial court's actions.
Read Chief Justice Warren's decision from the Miranda case.
The entire thrust of police interrogation
was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair
his capacity for rational judgment. . . . [T]he choice on his part to speak to the police-was not made
knowingly.
What did Chief Justice Warren say about how Miranda's confession was made?
• Miranda was aware of his rights when he made his confession.
© Miranda incriminated himself intentionally and knowingly.
O Miranda was unaware of his rights but his confession could be used.
• Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.
The correct answer is: "Miranda incriminated himself without knowing he could refuse to do so.
Have a good day.
What's my favorite song by Juice WRLD
Answer:
Wishing Well or Come and Go (i like come and go better btw)
Explanation:
Answer:
Dumb Slu or Numb the pain
Explanation:
Is it a good idea to have so many different levels of police jurisdiction? What are the advantages and, or disadvantages?
Answer and Explanation:
In general, we can say that it is a good idea to have different levels of police jurisdiction in a region, but this system has some disadvantages, in addition to the advantages. Among the advantages, we can say that the different jurisdictions make police work organized and fast, since all jurisdictions can work together with different elements. Furthermore, this allows a complete and efficient police control, consistent with the reality of the city. Among the disadvantages, we can say that this can limit police work in some cases, especially in relation to police reinforcement in other states and the rapid action of police in different jurisdictions to which they are related.
You are eligible to get your Class E restricted license when you
are at least 16 years old and have had your Learner License for
at least. ___months.
9
2
6
12
Answer:
6 months
hey!
To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.
The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.
hope that helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is 6 months.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRIANLIST
PLEASE EXPLAIN THE TERRIBLE V TERRIBLE SUPREME COURT CASE TO ME I DON’T GET IT OLEASE EXPLAIN IT IN AN EASY WAY THANK YOUUUU
The case is about legal dispute between a divorced couple over distribution of property where the ex-wife claimed that her ex-husband's gambling winnings should be considered community property.
What is the Terrible v. Terrible case about?In the Terrible v. Terrible case, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that gambling winnings can be considered community property if the gambling activity is considered a form of marital property.
The court found that since the ex-husband's gambling winnings were generated during the marriage and with the use of community property, the ex-wife was entitled to a portion of the winnings.
The decision established a precedent in Nevada that gambling winnings can be considered community property in certain circumstances.
Read more about State cases
brainly.com/question/29547496
#SPJ1
Where should you start your u-turn on a street with two lanes in each direction? Always in the center left turn lane
In the right lane
In the left lane
You should always start your u-turn in the center left turn lane, if available. Starting a u-turn from the leftmost through lane can be dangerous as oncoming traffic in the right lane may not expect you to turn across their path. Starting from the right lane also poses risks, as traffic behind you may not expect you to execute a u-turn from that lane.
The recommendations for safe u-turns are:
- Only make u-turns where clearly marked or permitted. Do not make them at intersections without explicit signage.
- Always signal your intention to turn well in advance.
- Check for traffic in all directions, including oncoming traffic in the farthest lane from you.
- Pull into the center left turn lane if available and come to a complete stop to verify traffic has cleared in both directions.
- Execute the turn carefully and smoothly, accelerating through the turn.
- Once completed, re-check for traffic before merging back into the nearest travel lane going your intended direction.
So in summary, the safest place to start a u-turn on a multi-lane street is always in the center left turn lane, if one is available. The key is to be predictable, use proper signaling and verify traffic has cleared in all lanes before executing the turn.
A form or type of democracy used in the United States is a
Answer:
Representative democracy
Explanation:
The United States is a representative democracy. This means that our government is elected by citizens. Here, citizens vote for their government officials.
Biden has dementia. This is not fake.
Answer:
ye
Explanation: