Use Pythagorean theorem! Will give b !

The equivalent expression for 1.5 cubed over 1.3 raised to the fourth power all raised to the power of negative six is 1.5 to the eighteenth power over 1.3 to the twenty-fourth power.

Here are the steps to simplify the expression:

Apply the negative power rule: (1.5 cubed over 1.3 raised to the fourth power) raised to the power of negative six is equal to (1.3 raised to the fourth power over 1.5 cubed) raised to the power of six.

Apply the power of a quotient rule: (1.3 raised to the fourth power over 1.5 cubed) raised to the power of six is equal to (1.3 raised to the fourth power)⁶ / (1.5 cubed)⁶.

Apply the power of a power rule: (1.3 raised to the fourth power)⁶ is equal to 1.3(⁴*⁶) = 1.3²⁴.

Apply the power of a power rule: (1.5 cubed)⁶ is equal to 1.5(³*⁶) = 1.5¹⁸.

Therefore, the equivalent expression is 1.5¹⁸ / 1.3²⁴.

Learn more about expressions on

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ4

Answer:

negative reciprocals of each other

Step-by-step explanation:

internet

The equation of the mirror line for the segment with endpoints (5, 4) and (-1, -1) is y= 5/6 x-1/6.

The general equation of a straight line is y=mx+c, where m is the gradient, and y = c is the value where the line cuts the y-axis. This number c is called the intercept on the y-axis.

The given coordinate points are (5, 4) and (-1, -1).

Put (5, 4) and (-1, -1) in slope m = (y₂-y₁)/(x₂-x₁), we get

m= (-1-4)/(-1-5)

m= -5/(-6)

m =5/6

Substitute m=5/6 and (x, y)=(5, 4) in y=mx+c, we get

4=5/6 (5)+c

c=4-25/6

c=-1/6

Substitute m=5/6 and c=-1/6 in y=mx+c, we get

y= 5/6 x-1/6

Therefore, the equation of the mirror line for the segment with endpoints (5, 4) and (-1, -1) is y= 5/6 x-1/6.

To learn more about the the equation of a line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2564656.

#SPJ1

It has returned 13.8% during the past year when the return on one-year treasury bills has been 3.6%. The Sharpe ratio of the North Equity Fund is closest to 0.45.

The Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return and helps investors assess the return they receive for each unit of risk taken. In this case, the North Equity Fund has a beta of 1.67, indicating that it is more volatile than the overall market. The standard deviation of 22.6% also highlights the fund's volatility.

Despite this, the fund has delivered a return of 13.8% over the past year, outperforming the return on one-year Treasury bills, which was 3.6%. The Sharpe ratio, calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate (T-bills return) from the fund's return and dividing it by the fund's standard deviation, yields a value closest to 0.45.

The Sharpe ratio is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate (in this case, the return on one-year Treasury bills) from the fund's return and dividing it by the fund's standard deviation. In this scenario, the North Equity Fund's return is 13.8% minus the risk-free rate of 3.6%, resulting in a risk premium of 10.2%.

Dividing this risk premium by the fund's standard deviation of 22.6% gives us a Sharpe ratio of approximately 0.45. The Sharpe ratio measures the excess return per unit of risk, with a higher ratio indicating better risk-adjusted performance.

Therefore, the closest answer is 0.45, suggesting that the North Equity Fund provides a relatively modest risk-adjusted return.

Learn more about Ratio:

brainly.com/question/31945112

#SPJ11

The order for 50 chain saws will be shipped at the start of week 8.As the manager, I will ensure that the assembly of the 50 chain saws begins at the start of week 6 to meet the shipping deadline at the start of week 8.

To determine the shipping date, we need to consider the production time for assembling the chain saws. Assuming a standard production time of 2 weeks, we can calculate the start date for production.

Start date for production = Shipping date - Production time = Week 8 - 2 weeks = Week 6

Therefore, the assembly of the chain saws should start at the beginning of week 6 in order to meet the shipping deadline at the start of week 8.

As the manager, I will ensure that the assembly of the 50 chain saws begins at the start of week 6 to meet the shipping deadline at the start of week 8. This will ensure that the order is fulfilled on time and the customer's expectations are met.

To know more about  order follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve an algebraic expression in simplest form, you can follow these steps:

1. Use the order of operations (PEMDAS) to simplify any arithmetic in the expression (parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division, addition and subtraction).

2. Combine like terms by adding or subtracting any coefficients in front of similar variables.

3. Divide or multiply both sides of the equation by the same non-zero number to solve for the variable.

4. If possible, factor the expression to make it simpler.

5. If the expression is a fraction, check for a common denominator and then simplify by canceling any common factors in the numerator and denominator.

6. If the expression is a radical, check for a perfect square and simplify by taking the square root of the number inside the radical.

7. Use the properties of exponents and logarithms to simplify the expression.

8. Evaluate the expression by plugging in the values of any known variables.

It's important to keep in mind that there may be multiple ways to simplify an algebraic expression and the solution that is in simplest form may not always be obvious.

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the 3 angles in a triangle = 180°

Sum the3 given angles and equate to 180

x + 6 + 3x - 2 + 7x = 180, that is

11x + 4 = 180 ( subtract 4 from both sides )

11x = 176 ( divide both sides by 11 )

x = 16

Thus

∠ V = x + 6 = 16 + 6 = 22°

∠ W = 3x - 2 = 3(16) - 2 = 48 - 2 = 46°

∠ X = 7x = 7(16) = 112°

Step-by-step explanation:

the output is 5 .........

By using the formula of compound interest we can say that at the end of second year Mrs. Smith will have $65,771.58.

The interest earned from the initial deposit plus the cumulative interest is known as compound interest.

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where P is the principle balance, r is the interest rate, n is the number of times interest is compounded per time period, and t is the total number of time periods, is the formula for compound interest.

Given that,

For first year,

P (principal) = $60,000.00

R = 4.3%

n  = 1

t = 1

First, convert R as a percent to r as a decimal

r = R/100

r = 4.3/100

r = 0.043 rate per year,

Then solve the equation for A

A = P(1 + r/n)^nt

A = 60,000.00(1 + 0.043/1)^(1×1)

A = 60,000.00(1 + 0.043)^(1)

A = $62,580.00

A = P + I  where,

P (principal) = $60,000.00

I (interest) = $2,580.00

So, by the end of second year Mrs. Smith will have $62,580.00.

Now, the amount calculated from first year will become the principle for second year.

For second year,

P (principal) = $62,580.00

R = 5.1%

n=1

t=1

First, convert R as a percent to r as a decimal

r = R/100

r = 5.1/100

r = 0.051 rate per year,

Then solve the equation for A

A = P(1 + r/n)^nt

A = 62,580.00(1 + 0.051/1)^(1×1)

A = 62,580.00(1 + 0.051)^(1)

A = $65,771.58

A = P + I where,

P (principal) = $62,580.00

I (interest) = $3,191.58

So, by the end of second year Mrs. Smith will have $65,771.58.

To learn more about compound interest, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ9

To determine whether the set S is linearly independent or linearly dependent.The set is linearly independent. This is because the only way to make a linear combination of vectors equal to the zero vector is to have all the coefficients equal to zero.

A linear combination of vectors is the sum of a scalar multiple of each vector in the set. We must check if the equation a(-2,2,4) + b(1,9,-2) + c(2,3,-3) = (0,0,0) has only the trivial solution, i.e., a=b=c=0. This gives us the system of equations,-2a + b + 2c = 01a + 9b + 3c = 02a - 2b - 3c = 0We can solve the system of equations by using Gauss-Jordan elimination. The augmented matrix for the system is:[-2 1 2 0][1 9 3 0][2 -2 -3 0]Let's use elementary row operations to simplify the matrix.

We can swap the first and second rows since the first element in the second row is 1.[1 9 3 0][-2 1 2 0][2 -2 -3 0]We can then add twice the first row to the third row to eliminate the leading coefficient in the third row.[1 9 3 0][-2 1 2 0][0 16 3 0]We can then add nine times the first row to the second row to eliminate the leading coefficient in the second row.[1 9 3 0][0 17 15 0][0 16 3 0]We can then add -16/17 times the second row to the third row to eliminate the leading coefficient in the third row.[1 9 3 0][0 17 15 0][0 0 -117/17 0]We see that the only solution is a=0, b=0, and c=0. Therefore, the set S is linearly independent.

To know more about matrix visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28180105

#SPJ11

Yes, it is appropriate to compute the likelihood that a random ladybug in Raleigh will be larger than 1.5 cm.

With a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, the standard normal distribution is a normal distribution. The standard deviation, which indicates how much a given measurement deviates from the mean, is given by the standard normal distribution, which has zero as its center.

As the sample size is sufficient (440000) and the standard deviation is known, it is appropriate to use a normal distribution to estimate the distribution of ladybug lengths. A 1.5 cm long ladybug's z-score can be calculated as follows:

z = (1.5 - 1) / 0.2 = 2.5

We can calculate the likelihood of a z-score being greater than 2.5 using a conventional normal distribution table to be roughly 0.0062. Hence, the likelihood that a random ladybug in Raleigh will be larger than 1.5 cm is around 0.0062 or 0.62%.

Therefore, the correct answer is option d. Yes. Clear my choice.

The complete question is;

American ladybugs have an average adult length of 1 cm with a known standard deviation of 0.2 cm. The population of American ladybugs in Raleigh was around 440000 last spring. Assume a normal distribution for the lengths of adult American ladybugs. Your niece asks you what's the probability of a random ladybug in Raleigh being bigger than 1.5 cm. Is it appropriate to calculate this probability? Select one:

a. No, because the population distribution is skewed.

b. No, because the sample size is less than 30.

c. No, because the empirical rule is violated.

d. Yes. Clear my choice

To learn more about standard normal distribution refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13781953

#SPJ1

The puma must leave the ground with a speed of approximately 21.7 feet per second to reach a height of 12.0 feet when launched at an angle of 45°.

To calculate the speed at which the puma must leave the ground to reach a height of 12.0 feet, we can use the principles of projectile motion.

Given:

Initial height (h) = 0 feet (since it leaves the ground)

Final height (hf) = 12.0 feet

Launch angle (θ) = 45°

We can use the following kinematic equation to find the initial velocity (v₀) of the puma:

hf = h + v₀² * sin²(θ) / (2 * g)

Where g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Rearranging the equation, we have:

v₀ = sqrt((hf - h) * (2 * g) / sin²(θ))

Substituting the given values:

v₀ = sqrt((12.0 - 0) * (2 * 9.8) / sin²(45°))

= sqrt(24 * 19.6 / 0.5)

= sqrt(470.4)

≈ 21.7 feet per second (rounded to one decimal place)

Therefore, the puma must leave the ground with a speed of approximately 21.7 feet per second to reach a height of 12.0 feet when launched at an angle of 45°.

Learn more about speed distance here;

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

In order to solve this question, we need to use the z-score z of value x, belonging to a normal distribution with mean μ and standard deviation σ.

z is defined as:

In this problem, we have, in pounds:

μ = 8.9

σ = 1.1

PART 1

So, the percentage of domestic house cats that weigh less than 7.8 pounds is:

And from a z-score table, we have:

Therefore, the percentage of domestic house cats that weigh less than 7.8 pounds is approximately 0.1587 or 15.87%.

PART 2

The percentage of domestic house cats that weigh more than 11.1 pounds is 1 minus the percentage of them that weigh less than that:

Therefore, the percentage of domestic house cats that weigh more than 11.1 pounds is approximately 0.0228 or 2.28%.

PART 3

The domestic house cat weighing 9 pounds is in percentile P(x<9):

Therefore, a domestic house cat weighing 9 pounds is in the 54th percentile.

Answer:

c = -22, 22

Step-by-step explanation:

\( {(x - 11)}^{2} = {x}^{2} - 22x + 121\)

\( {(x + 11)}^{2} = {x}^{2} + 22x + 121\)

The type of conic section that is represented in the provided equation form is ellipse.

To identify the type of conic section from an equation whether it is circle or ellipse.

Let us  suppose the equation as,

\(Ax^{2} +By^{2}+Cx+Dy+E=0\)

In this equation,

We have to identify the type of conic section that has the equation,

\(4x^{2} +25y^{2}=100\)

By comparing this equation with the above equation, we get,

\(A=4\\B=25\)

Here neither \(A\) or \(B\) is equal to \(0\) and the sign of both are

similar(positive), so the equation form is ellipse.

Therefore, the type of conic section which is represented in the provided equation form is ellipse.

To learn more about the conic section, visit the link here:

brainly.com/question/8320698

#SPJ4

Answer:

it 2 parts away

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(0,0)  (20, 10)  (40,10)   (60,40)  (100,0)

 A          B           C            D           E

Step-by-step explanation:

i. After 6 years, the amount in the bank account with annual compounding will be $4,238.51.

ii. After 6 years, the amount in the bank account with quarterly compounding will be $4,243.06.

iii. After 6 years, the amount in the bank account with monthly compounding will be $4,245.97.

iv. After 6 years, the amount in the bank account with continuous compounding will be $4,246.93.

To calculate the future amount in the bank account after 6 years with different compounding frequencies, we can use the formula for compound interest: A =\(P(1 + r/n)^(nt)\), where A is the future amount, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, n is the compounding frequency per year, and t is the number of years.

i. With annual compounding: A = \(3000(1 + 0.06/1)^(16)\) = $4,238.51.

ii. With quarterly compounding: A = \(3000(1 + 0.06/4)^(46)\)= $4,243.06.

iii. With monthly compounding: A = \(3000(1 + 0.06/12)^(126)\) = $4,245.97.

iv. With continuous compounding: A = \(3000e^(0.066)\) = $4,246.93 (using the formula A = Pe^(rt) where e is the base of the natural logarithm).

These calculations demonstrate how the compounding frequency affects the growth of the investment over time, with more frequent compounding resulting in slightly higher future amounts.

learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ11

Answer:

882.347

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, the equation y = 5x represents a proportional relationship

Two or more expressions with an Equal sign is called as Equation.

The given equation is y=5x.

In a proportional relationship, the ratio of y to x is constant.

In the given equation the variable x and y has a proportional relationship.

The equation is in the form of y=mx+b

the ratio of y to x is 5, meaning that for every unit increase in x, y increases by 5 units.

Hence,  Yes, the equation y = 5x represents a proportional relationship

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

First position   26 possibilities

 second    25

   third   24

       fourth  10

           fifth   9

              sixth 8          

     multiply all of these numbers together = 11 232 000 possible plates

Answer:

x = 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle Bisector Theorem:  PS / PQ = RS / QR

24/14 = x/7

cross-multiply:

14x = 168

x = 12

i agree with this statement completely sign me up

f: D -> R^2, defined as f(x, y) = (x/(1-√(x^2+y^2)), y/(1-√(x^2+y^2))), points from open disc D, where x^2+y^2<1, to points in R^2. solve x = u/(1-√(u^2+v^2)) and y = v/(1-√(u^2+v^2)) for u and v in terms of x and y.

By solving these equations, we obtain the inverse map g: R^2 -> D as g(u, v) = (±√(v^2 - y^2v^2)/(1-√(u^2+v^2)), ±√(u^4 - x^2u^2)/(1-√(u^2+v^2))).

To conclude that D and R^2 are homeomorphic, we need to show that both f and g are continuous and that f(g(u,v)) = (u,v) and g(f(x,y)) = (x,y) for all (x,y) in D and (u,v) in R^2.

Verifying these properties would require further analysis and computations, which are not provided in the question. Therefore, without the explicit verification of these properties, we cannot conclusively state that D and R^2 are homeomorphic based solely on the given map and its inverse. Further analysis is needed to establish the homeomorphism between D and R^2.

To learn more about points from open disc click here : brainly.com/question/4342357

#SPJ11

Answer:

Let f = number of people who donated $5 each and t = number of people who donated $10 each.

f + t = 197 ---------> f + t = 197

5f + 10t = 1310 ---> f + 2t = 262

-----------------

t = 65, f = 132

65 people each donated $10, 132 people each donated $5.

There were 65 people who pledged $10.

Let's say that x people donated $5, and y people donated $10 each, and the total number of donations is 197.

Therefore, we have x + y = 197 -----(1)

Furthermore, the total amount of money collected is $1310.

Since the people who donated $5 each gave half as much as those who gave $10, the total value of the money collected by people who donated $5 is:5x10 = $50xand the total value of the money collected by those who donated $10 is:10y

Therefore, the total value of money collected is:5x + 10y = $1310 -------(2)

Multiplying (1) by 5, we have:5x + 5y = 985-------(3)

By subtracting equation (3) from equation (2), we get:5y = 1310 - 9855y = 325y = 65So there were 65 people who pledged $10.

To know more about the total amount visit:

https://brainly.in/question/49556976

#SPJ11

Answer:

Triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DFE.

We have number of bottles on the x-axis and cost on the y-axis. To understadn the cost before any bottles are ordered, it is better to find the slope of the graph.

If the coefficient of determination is 0.94, we can say that ninety-four percent of the total variation of the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable. The correct answer is: ninety-four percent of the total variation of the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable.

This means that there is a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination, represented as R², measures the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable. In this case, an R² of 0.94 indicates that 94% of the total variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variable. The coefficient of determination does not provide information about the direction or strength of the relationship. The correct answer therefore is ninety-four percent of the total variation of the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable.

More on coefficient of determination: https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

The standard error of the sample mean of a given sample of 43 observations with standard deviation 8.85 is equal to 1.35 ( round to 2 decimal places).

As given in the question,

Population mean of the random variable 'μ' = 141

Standard deviation 'σ' = 8.85

Sample size 'N' = 43 observations

Standard error of the sample mean

= σ / √N

= 8.85 / √43

= 8.85 / 6.56

= 1.349

= 1.35 (round to 2 decimal places )

Therefore, for the given standard deviation and sample size the standard error of the sample mean is equal to 1.35.

Learn more about standard deviation here

brainly.com/question/16555520

#SPJ4