Answer:
during the "salutary neglect" British laws restricting colonies were poorly enforced
Explanation:
British laws on it's North American colonies restricted the colonies from having to trade with non British colonies and also other countries other than Britain. but these trade regulations was poorly enforced from the early to mid 18th century under then chief minister ROBERT WALPOLE as long as the colonies remained loyal and contributed to the economic growth of the Britain
How many motorcyclists were killed in traffic crashes in the United States in 2016
Answer:
5286
Explanation:
Answer: 5,286
Explanation: There were 5,286 reported deaths of motorcyclists in 2016.
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
Please submit an essay in your own words
regarding at least four vehicular fatalities
due to alcohol involvement.
This essay should be handwritten and at least
four pages long.
The essay about four vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement is as follows:
Drvnk driving is a serious issue that affects not only the driver but also innocent passengers and other drivers on the road. It is a leading cause of vehicular fatalities and injuries, and it is entirely preventable. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2019, 10,142 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes, accounting for 28% of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.
One of the most famous cases of dru.nk driving fatalities is the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, and their driver Henri Paul. In 1997, Henri Paul was driving Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed in Paris when he lost control of the car and crashed into a pillar. The investigation revealed that Paul was under the influence of alcohol and had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level three times over the legal limit in France. This tragedy serves as a reminder of the dangers of dru.nk driving and the catastrophic consequences it can have.
Another example is the case of Ethan Couch, who was driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in 2013 when he crashed his truck into a group of pedestrians, killing four people and injuring several others. Couch was only 16 years old at the time and had a BAC level of 0.24%, which is three times over the legal limit for adults in Texas. He was given a controversial sentence of probation and rehabilitation, which sparked outrage and led to the coining of the term "affluenza."
In 2016, former NFL player Will Smith was killed in a shooting that occurred after a road rage incident with another driver in New Orleans. The shooter, Cardell Hayes, was later found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 25 years in prison. The investigation revealed that both Smith and Hayes were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident. Smith's death serves as a tragic reminder of how alcohol can fuel anger and aggression, leading to deadly consequences.
Lastly, in 2018, a limousine crash in upstate New York killed 20 people, making it the deadliest transportation accident in the US since 2009. The limo driver, who did not have the proper license to operate the vehicle, had a history of drug and alcohol abuse. The investigation revealed that the limo's brakes were not functioning properly, and the driver was unable to stop the vehicle as it went through a stop sign and crashed into a parked car. This tragedy underscores the importance of ensuring that vehicles are in good working condition and that drivers are properly licensed and sober before getting behind the wheel.
In conclusion, dru.nk driving is a serious issue that can have deadly consequences. These examples serve as a reminder of the importance of being responsible and making smart choices when it comes to alcohol and driving. It is vital to never get behind the wheel if you have been drinking, and to make sure that you have a designated driver or alternative transportation if you plan on drinking. By taking these simple steps, we can prevent needless tragedies and keep our roads safe for everyone.
Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement refer to deaths caused by drivers who operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. When drivers consume alcohol, it impairs their ability to operate a vehicle safely, leading to reckless behavior, poor decision-making, and slower reaction times.
As a result, they may cause accidents that result in the loss of life or serious injuries to themselves and others on the road. Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement are entirely preventable and are a significant public safety concern.
It is crucial to raise awareness about the dangers of DUI driving and promote responsible behaviors to reduce the number of deaths caused by this preventable issue.
Learn more about Driving Under the Influence (DUI): https://brainly.com/question/29771200
#SPJ11
which school is the best Elementary, Middle or High school choose one
Answer:
I'd say high school
Suppose Polly filed a civil complaint in South Carolina state court naming a company called Dobby's Oyster Shack as the defendant. In Polly's complaint, she alleged that she "suffered a serious illness caused by a Dobby's Oyster Shack employee who negligently served her contaminated oysters." Dobby's Oyster Shack hopes to utilize the tools of discovery to win the case before trial by filing a motion for summary judgment. (a) What are two examples of facts Dobby's Oyster Shack should seek to establish in discovery in preparation for its motion for summary judgment? (b) Explain how Dobby's Oyster Shack should use the specific tools of discovery (interrogatories, subpoenas, depositions, etc.) to establish the facts you identified in question (a).
Answer:
(b) Dobby's Oyster Shack can use the following specific tools of discovery to establish the above-mentioned facts:
1. Interrogatories: Dobby's Oyster Shack can use interrogatories to ask Polly to provide detailed information about the symptoms she experienced after consuming the oysters and any medical records related to her illness. They can also ask her to identify any witnesses who were present at the time of her visit to the restaurant and whether or not they also consumed oysters.
Explanation:
Due process requirements entitle an individual to "notice" and a "hearing" if he or she is deprived of a liberty or property interest.
True
False
Essay help- Discuss and resolve the debate, issue, or question of whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit the number of designated classes; e.g., LBTQI etc., or expand them. At what point should the “queering” or “queerness” end? Include in your discussion, how useful the race-class-gender paradigm has been in criminology and its expansion or refinement
Answer:
The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.
Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.
The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.
In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.
Explanation:
eliminating political conflict primary macroeconomic policy goal not a primary macroeconomic policy goal
Eliminating political conflict is not a primary macroeconomic policy goal.
While macroeconomic policies play a crucial role in shaping a country's economic landscape, their primary objective is not to eliminate political conflict. Macroeconomic policies primarily focus on managing factors such as inflation, unemployment, and economic growth to ensure overall stability and prosperity. Although political conflict can have economic implications, such as reduced investor confidence or disruptions in policy implementation, addressing political conflicts falls more within the realm of political and social strategies rather than macroeconomic policy. Macroeconomic policies aim to create an environment conducive to sustainable economic development, but the resolution of political conflicts is typically beyond the scope of these policies.
Macroeconomic policy refers to the set of measures and strategies implemented by governments or central banks to influence the overall performance of the economy. These policies aim to achieve certain goals, such as controlling inflation, reducing unemployment, and promoting economic growth. While political stability is generally considered favorable for economic development, eliminating political conflict is not the primary goal of macroeconomic policy.
Macroeconomic policies primarily focus on managing the aggregate demand and supply in an economy to maintain stability and foster sustainable growth. For example, central banks use monetary policy tools like interest rates and open market operations to control inflation and ensure price stability. Fiscal policies, on the other hand, involve government spending, taxation, and borrowing to influence aggregate demand and support economic growth.
Political conflicts, such as partisan disputes or ideological differences, may impact economic conditions indirectly. For instance, prolonged political instability can lead to policy uncertainty, which can deter investment and hinder economic growth. However, addressing political conflicts requires political and social strategies, such as negotiation, mediation, and political reforms, which go beyond the scope of macroeconomic policies.
Learn more about political conflict
brainly.com/question/30240005
#SPJ11
FACTS: Stilton was promoted to chief executive officer (CEO) of Tamik, Inc. a pharmaceutical company that manufactures a vaccine called Kafluk, which supposedly provides some defense against bird flu. The company began marketing Kafluk throughout Asia. After numerous media reports that bird flu might soon become a worldwide epidemic, the demand for Kafluk increased, sales soared, and Tamik earned record profits. Tamik’s CEO, Stilton, then began receiving disturbing reports from Southeast Asia that in some patients, Kafluk had caused psychiatric disturbances, including severe hallucinations, and heart and lung problems. Stilton, was informed that six children in Japan had died after receiving the vaccine. To cover up the story and prevent negative publicity, instructed Tamik’s partners in Asia to offer cash to the Japanese families whose children had died in exchanged for their silence. Silton also refused to authorize additional research within the company to study the potential side effects of Kafluk. Using the information presented in chapter 7 of the 11th ed. textbook, answer the following questions:
1) What is business ethics, and why is it important? and how can business leaders encourage their companies to act ethically?
2) How do duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards?
3) If Kafluk prevented fifty Asian people who were exposed to bird flu from dying, would Stilton’s conduct in this situation be ethical under a outcome-based ethical standard? Why or why not?
4) Would Stilton’s conduct be ethical under a duty- based ethical standard? Why or why not?
5) Did Tamik or Silton violate the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act in this scenario? Why or why not?
Answer:
1A. What is business ethics, and why is it important? Ethics is the study of what constitutes right or wrong behavior—the fairness, justness, rightness, or wrongness of an action. Business ethics focuses on what constitutes ethical behavior in the world of business. An understanding of business ethics is important to the long-run viability of a business firm and to the well being of the firm’s officers, managers, and employees. A business firm also owes duties to a variety of “stakeholders” whom the firm’s decisions and activities may affect significantly.
2A. How do duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards? Duty-based ethical standards are derived from religious precepts or philosophical principles. Outcome-based ethics focus on the consequences of an action, not on the nature of the action or on a set of pre-established moral values or religious beliefs.
3A. What are five steps that a business person can take to evaluate whether his or her actions are ethical? The first step is inquiry, the business decision maker must understand the problem, identify the parties involved and collect the relevant facts. Step 2 is to list the possible actions and goals, and discuss and evaluate the ethical principles of each option. The third step is to make a decision or adopt a plan of action. The fourth step is to articulate or document the reasoning (justification) underlying the decision. Once the decision has been made and implemented, step 5 is to evaluate the solution to determine if it was effective. This final step guides the businessperson when making future ethical decisions.
4A. How can business leaders encourage their companies to act ethically? Ethical leadership is important to create and maintain an ethical workplace. Managers can set standards, and apply those standards to themselves and their firm’s employees.
5A. What types of ethical issues might arise in the context of international business transactions? The most common types of issues to arise in an international context are those created by the different ethical standards and practices among different cultures and nations. These may include employment policies, the treatment of women and minorities, and (less likely) situations involving bribes.
Explanation:
hope this helps a litttle
which of the following rights is guaranteed by the fifth amendment? a. be heard by an impartial jury. b. be represented by legal counsel. c. receive a speedy and public trial. d. requires the state to apply due process of law.
The correct answer is D. Rights are guaranteed by the fifth amendment requires the state to apply due process of law.
An amendment is a formal change or addition made to a legal document, such as a constitution, law, or treaty. It is a way to modify or update the existing content of the document without requiring a complete overhaul. Amendments play a vital role in democratic societies by allowing for the adaptation of laws to meet evolving needs, address shortcomings, or correct any injustices.
The process of amending a document usually involves a specific set of procedures outlined in the original document itself or in a separate amendment process. These procedures typically require a designated authority, such as a legislative body or a special committee, to propose, debate, and ultimately approve the amendment. Once approved, an amendment becomes an integral part of the original document, carrying the same legal weight as the original text.
To know more about Amendment refer to-
brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ4
Which behavior demonstrates leadership skills in a team?Which behavior demonstrates leadership skills in a team?
A.keeping a vision of the “big picture” of a project in mind
B.focusing on small mistakes made by team members
C.correcting a team member’s mistake in a team meeting
D.pointing out to team members that they have a lot to learn from you
Answer: I think its A) keeping a vision of the “big picture” of a project in mind
Explanation: it makes the most sense
Which of the following Acts gives employees the legal right to examine personnel files and letters of reference?
a. Civil Rights Act, Title VII
b. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
c. Privacy Act
d. Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act
Privacy Act gives employees the legal right to examine personnel files and letters of reference. The correct option is c.
Employees have the legal right to review their own personnel records and letters of recommendation thanks to the Privacy Act. Federal agencies and some employers in the private sector that keep personnel records are covered by this Act. It grants people the right to access and examine their personal information, including employment related records that is held by these organizations.
By enabling people to confirm the accuracy of their records and guarantee that sensitive information is handled appropriately, the Privacy Act aims to protect people's privacy. Additionally, it sets restrictions on the disclosure of private data without the individual's consent.
Learn more about Privacy Act at:
brainly.com/question/30160630
#SPJ4
Explain in detail how lobbyists impact the laws that are written.
Answer:
Lobbyists help inform Congress and the public about problems and issues. Lobbyists provide technical information about legislative proposals. And lobbyists let lawmakers know whom a bill would help and whom it would hurt.
Explanation:
Difference between negotiation and mediation
Explanation:
In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.
DRIVERS ED!!!
What is an Uber area?
A. Cities and towns
B. Farms and crops
C. Countryside
D. Mountain peaks
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:A
Look on the Uber up lol r you going to try to Uber to the top of a mountain no
What are the 4 types of committees that help congress carry out their constitutional duties
The 4 types of committees that help Congress carry out their constitutional duties include the Standing committees, Select committees, Joint committees, and committees of the Whole.
What are the committees?Committees in U.S. Congress refer to groups of members selected to find out, debate, and report on the legislation, created to help Congress organize and coordinate their work.
They are very vital to the legislative process since their introduction in the first Congress (1789).
The four types of Congressional include:
Standing committees review, research, and revise bills and other legislations presented before the House of Representatives. Select committees are often temporary committees set up with the purpose of completing a certain task, usually on researching government activity.Joint committees in the U.S. comprises members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate who argue and report on matters about Congress. The committee of the Whole debates bills more efficiently. It requires a smaller quorum of only 100 members.Learn more about the U.S. Congress at brainly.com/question/779570.
#SPJ1
Why might investigators want to be more careful examining chemical properties than physical properties?.
Because anything involving a chemical reaction is irreversible, investigators may want to be more cautious while analyzing chemical properties than physical ones. Physical changes may be reversible.
When investigating the chemical characteristics of particular compounds, reaction might also happen readily. Physical reactions are uncommon and rarely occur. Chemical qualities can sometimes be complicated and dangerous, but physical properties are typically less complicated and dangerous. Due to the aforementioned reasons, investigators will want to exercise greater caution while reviewing evidence pertaining to chemical properties than physical properties. Physical changes may be reversible.
learn more about chemical properties here:
https://brainly.com/question/18487204
#SPJ4
After 1 month on the job, Tanner was fired for not learning the job fast enough. His employer can do this easily under a(n) ______.
A) At-will employment agreement
B) Fixed-term employment contract
C) Collective bargaining agreement
D) Employment discrimination law
After 1 month on the job, Tanner was fired for not learning the job fast enough. His employer can do this easily under an At-will employment agreement.
An at-will employment agreement is an agreement between an employee and employer in which either party can terminate the relationship at any time without providing any advance notice. Both parties have the option to sever the relationship for any reason or no reason at all. In an at-will relationship, the employer has the right to fire an employee for any cause or no cause at all.Therefore, in the given scenario, Tanner's employer can easily fire him under an At-will employment agreement because he did not learn the job fast enough in the given time period. The employer has the right to fire an employee in an at-will employment agreement at any time for any reason.
To know more about Employment agreement visit-
brainly.com/question/32178128
#SPJ11
list and define the six general categories of crime and give an example of each.
The six general categories of crime include personal crimes (assault, murder), property crimes (theft, arson), inchoate crimes (attempted robbery, conspiracy), financial crimes (fraud, money laundering), statutory crimes (drug possession, traffic violations), and cybercrimes (hacking, phishing). These categories encompass a wide range of offenses involving harm to individuals, property, financial systems, incomplete crimes, violations of specific laws, and illegal activities conducted through digital means.
The six general categories of crime are:
Personal Crimes: These involve direct harm or threat to an individual. Examples include assault, robbery, murder, or domestic violence.Property Crimes: These crimes target someone's property or belongings. Examples include burglary, theft, arson, or vandalism.Inchoate Crimes: These are incomplete or anticipatory crimes. Examples include attempted robbery, solicitation of a crime, or conspiracy.Financial Crimes: These involve illegal activities related to money or finances. Examples include fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or identity theft.Statutory Crimes: These are offenses that violate specific laws or statutes. Examples include traffic violations, drug possession, tax evasion, or public intoxication.Cybercrimes: These crimes are committed using computer networks or digital devices. Examples include hacking, phishing, online fraud, or cyberstalking.To know more about cybercrimes refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ11
First American attempt at a Constitution ... failed badly. *
The Constitution
The Declaration of independence
The Federalist Papers
O The Articles of Confederation
Critics of the winner-take-all aspect of the electoral college are most likely to make which of the following arguments? A. The winner take all system of the electoral college undermines the rights of states. B A state's presidential election results rarely mirror a state's congressional election results C The winner take-all system of the electoral college drives presidential candidates to focus on winning states that are considered to be part of their core supporters D. The winner take-all system of the electoral college encourages presidential candidates to focus their time and effort disproportionately on battleground states with larger populations
Critics of the winner-take-all aspect of the electoral college are most likely to make the argument presented in option D: The winner take-all system of the electoral college encourages presidential candidates to focus their time and effort disproportionately on battleground states with larger populations.
This argument suggests that the winner-take-all system distorts the campaign strategies of presidential candidates. Since the candidate who wins the majority of votes in a state receives all of its electoral votes, candidates tend to prioritize states that are considered battlegrounds or swing states, where the outcome is uncertain. Consequently, candidates may allocate a disproportionate amount of time, resources, and policy attention to these states, neglecting the concerns and interests of voters in non-competitive or less populated states. This can lead to a perception of unequal representation and a skewing of national priorities.
Learn more about populated states
https://brainly.com/question/12962423
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court case of ___________ extended the exclusionary rule to the states.
Answer:
Mapp v. Ohio
Explanation:
Supreme Court Extends Exclusionary Rule to the States
Then, in Mapp v. Ohio,18 the Court held that the exclusionary rule applied to the states.
Answer:
Mapp vs. Ohio
Explanation:
Teacher approved
a statue enacted by the wyoming state legislature to regulate trucking affects interstate commerce. in evaluating this statute, the courts will weight the burden that it imposes on interstate cmmerence against
The legislative branch of government is accountable for making legal guidelines within a rustic. Legislatures are made of people referred to as legislators who, in democracies, are elected with the aid of the united states' populace.
Their powers can also include passing legal guidelines, setting up the authorities' finances, confirming executive appointments, ratifying treaties, investigating the executive department, impeaching and casting off from workplace participants of the government and judiciary, and redressing components' grievances.
The Legislative meeting has four primary roles: to symbolize the people; to form the executive government for brand spanking new South Wales; to legislate, and to approve the government's request for cash.
A state is a legislative branch or body of a political subdivision in a federal gadget. two federations literally use the time period "state legislature": The legislative branches of each of the fifty nation governments of us are known as state legislatures.
Learn more about legislature here:
https://brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
What is a document filed with government that outlines wages, taxes paid and reconciliation?
U.S. taxpayers utilize form 1040 to submit an annual income tax return to the government that lists wages, taxes paid, and reconciliation.
What is meant by annual income tax?An income tax is a charge levied against people or organizations (taxpayers) in relation to their earnings (commonly called taxable income). In most cases, income tax is calculated as the sum of the tax rate and the amount of taxable income. All sources of taxable income earned during a tax year must be added up in order to determine your income tax liability. The following step is to determine your adjusted gross income (AGI). Once you've done that, take your AGI and any deductions you are qualified for.Income taxes make up about 80% of all federal revenue, which is the primary source of funding for social programs like Social Security and Medicare. Payroll taxes are another important source of funding for the federal government.To learn more about annual income tax, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
Which is an example of a president using their election popularity to advance his policies?
a. Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation
b. Reagan and the "trickle down" economic theory
c. Obama and the Affordable Care Act
d. FDR and the New Deal
There are lots of policies. An example of a president using their election popularity to advance his policies is and the Affordable Care Act.
What is Barack Obama famous for?He was said to be born on August 4, 1961. He is known to be the 44th president of the United States and the first African-American president of the United States.
Barack Obama Election was said to be very popular because he was the first black president. His policies of Affordable Care Act was a call for full equality of LGBT community.
Learn more about Barack Obama from
https://brainly.com/question/1125105
if someone gets shot by a cop on accident during a shooting will the cop get in trouble?
Answer:
on accident it is still a crime and some medical bills for the cop to pay
Explanation:
fun fact: if a cop asks to search your car you say "i invoke the 5th"
Jose can't wait to buy his first car next month. He imagines that he will make several new friends at school since everyone will want to ride in his car. He is even having a hard time concentrating on filling orders at the restaurant where he works. Does Jose's thinking have an ethical component? Who is most affected by Jose's conduct? *
Answer:
no , jose Is Mostly effected because he is about to buy and As he is Having hard time filling orders He isn't doing his job properly which is affecting the consumers..And there is A high risk of losing job in the way he is hampering his Job to think
Jose the time thinking about the car, and time loses their job at the restaurant.
What is the restaurant?
A “restaurant” is a location where people eat food. Waiters offered services in the restaurant, and customers ordered food. People exchange services with the help of money. Customers are drawn in by the restaurant's atmosphere, service, and food. A restaurant is the provided the food with cleanliness and more hygiene.
Jose largely affected himself because he did not take care of the job. Jose was constantly concerned that the new car was not working well at her job. Most customers are hardly impacted. As a result, Jose was impacted whenever he lost his job at the restaurant.
As a result, Jose impacted himself because he all the time thinking for the new car. He was the not 100% concentrate her job are more chances to loss her restaurant job.
Learn more about the restaurant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27316334
#SPJ2
the minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the workers' adjustment retraining and notification act of 1989 is
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 (WARN Act) is 60 days.
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 is 60 days. The WARN Act is a labor law in the United States that provides job security to workers by requiring that companies give their employees sufficient notice before layoffs or plant closings.
When a covered employer terminates employment of 50 or more workers at a single site of employment, the employer must give at least 60 days’ notice to the affected employees. Employees who are separated from employment are entitled to certain notice obligations under the WARN Act. The WARN Act also applies to plant closings and mass layoffs that occur in stages over a period of time, rather than all at once.
Learn more about Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification (WARN) Act of 1988: https://brainly.com/question/31088800
#SPJ11