TRUE. Newer models of community organizing and community building recognize the importance of fluidity between collaboration and advocacy. Rather than viewing these as separate and distinct approaches, newer models recognize that they can work together to achieve community goals.
Collaboration involves working with others in the community to identify and address common concerns, while advocacy involves speaking up on behalf of the community to address systemic issues. By combining these approaches, community organizers and builders can effectively leverage community strengths and resources to achieve positive change.
Additionally, newer models place a strong emphasis on recognizing and building upon existing community strengths, rather than simply identifying and addressing deficits. This strengths-based approach recognizes that communities have unique assets and resources that can be harnessed to achieve positive outcomes, and seeks to empower community members to take an active role in shaping their own futures. Overall, newer models of community organizing and community building represent a more collaborative, inclusive, and empowering approach to community development.
To know more about Newer models visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14673007
#SPJ11
George Kildearn is forty years old. He was born in Dublin, Ireland, but has lived in California the past fifteen years, ever since he married his wife, who is a native Californian. He wants to run for office. What do you recommend?
What were two critical findings of the ABA survey of restitution directors?
Answer:
Findings from a study conducted by the American Bar Association (ABA), Improving Enforcement of Court-Ordered Restitution, suggest that higher compliance rates result: (1) when efforts are made to monitor payments, and (2) when consistent action is taken to respond to delinquencies.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
All of the following statements are false. Correct each statement to make it true.
12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.
14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.
15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.
12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
The most common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.
To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no unexplained or undocumented openings in the evidence package.
14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.
Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable and accurate.
15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.
When evidence is opened, there must be proper documentation to prove it.
The passage below is from Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78
"Limitations (on the power of gevernment] ... can be preserved in practice in no other way than
through ...courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor
[obvious meaning] of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or
privileges would amount to nothing."
Based on the passage, what significant power did Alexander Hamilton foresee for the federal courts?
A. judicial activism
B. judicial review
C. stare decisis
D. precedent
The passage below is from Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78
"Limitations (on the power of gevernment] ... can be preserved in practice in no other way than
through ...courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor
[obvious meaning] of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or
privileges would amount to nothing."
Based on the passage, what significant power did Alexander Hamilton foresee for the federal courts?
Answer:
D. precedent
It is a long-term holding facility for sentenced offenders. Estelle v. Gamble (1976) is to ______ as Wolff v. McDonnell (1974) is to ______.
It is a long-term holding facility for sentenced offenders. Estelle v. Gamble (1976) is to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment, as Wolff v. McDonnell (1974) is to due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Estelle v. Gamble was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court ruled that deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The case established the principle that prisons have an obligation to provide adequate medical care to inmates, and that failure to do so can be a violation of their constitutional rights.
Wolff v. McDonnell, on the other hand, was a case that addressed the due process rights of prisoners. The Supreme Court held that prisoners are entitled to certain procedural protections in disciplinary hearings, including the right to notice of the charges against them, the right to present evidence and witnesses, and the right to a written statement of the decision.
Together, these cases established important precedents regarding the constitutional rights of prisoners and have been influential in shaping the way that the criminal justice system in the United States operates.
To know more about Estelle v. Gamble here:
https://brainly.com/question/28017300
#SPJ4
What physical property can help characterize fragments of glass at a crime scene?
Answer:
Here is your answer .
Explanation:
Refractive index is mostly commonly measured property in the forensic examination of glass fragments (koons etal. 2002), because:precise refractive indices can be measured rapidly on the small fragments typically found in casework.
Because exact refractive indices can be determined quickly on the microscopic fragments that are generally discovered in casework, refractive index is the most frequently measured property in the forensic investigation of glass shards (koons etal. 2002).
What is refractive?A material's refractive index serves as a gauge for how light moves through it. Light travels more slowly at higher refractive indices, which results in a proportionally greater change in the direction of the light within the substance.
Smashed glass at a crime scene can be identified by density. Numerous glasses' densities are known [1]. Ordinary window or bottle glass is the most prevalent sort of glass.
Therefore ,Because exact refractive indices can be determined quickly on the microscopic fragments
Learn more about refractive here:
https://brainly.com/question/14760207
#SPJ2
The four key elements of negligence are duty of care, breach of the duty of care, causation, and _____.
-warrantless search
-damages
-property
-allowance
Answer: Damages
Explanation:
The fourth key element of negligence is damages. It is an element of negligence that can include financial compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, and property loss.
What is negligence?The most usual definition of negligence is that it is conduct, or a failure to act, that breaches a duty to take care. It breaks down into several elements, all of which must exist to give rise to a liability to pay compensation. There must be a duty owed.
It is a situation in which a person acts in a careless manner, which results in someone else getting hurt or property being damaged.
Learn more about negligence here,
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ2
Govt FRQ
While the Constitution creates three separate but equal branches of government, recently many experts have argued that the executive branch has grown to such an extent that it now dominates the government superseding the legislature. Explain the rise of the executive branch using your understanding of the three branches, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
(Use complete sentences and construct an argument as your introduction. Provide evidence in favor of your argument in your supporting paragraph(s).
PLEASE HELP ME I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT PLSS
There is a growing argument among experts that the executive branch of the government has expanded significantly in recent years, leading to a dominant role that supersedes the legislature.
In this response, we will explore the factors contributing to the rise of the executive branch, considering the three branches of government, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
Supporting Paragraph:
One factor contributing to the rise of the executive branch is the expansion of executive powers granted by the Constitution & federal bureaucracy.and interpreted through judicial rulings. The Constitution designates specific powers to each branch, but over time, the interpretation of these powers has expanded, particularly in the executive branch's favor. For example, the "necessary and proper" clause and the "commerce clause" have been broadly interpreted to grant the executive branch authority to implement policies and regulations that impact various aspects of society.
However, it is important to ensure a proper balance of powers and uphold the principles of checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of our democratic system.
To learn more about federal bureaucracy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29614668
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not one of the purposes of an internal control system?
Multiple Choice
o The assessment of the degree of compliance with company policies and public laws
o Safeguarding the company’s assets
o The evaluation of performance
o Ensuring that the company is using the most effective marketing plan
Ensuring that the company is using the most effective marketing plan is not one of the purposes of an internal control system.
The primary purpose of an internal control system is to provide reasonable assurance that an entity will achieve its objectives regarding reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and safeguarding of assets.
The objectives of an internal control system are to prevent and detect fraud, error, and mismanagement; verify accuracy of accounts; authorize and record transactions; maintain accountability of assets; improve operational efficiency; and ensure compliance with public laws.
To know more about internal control system , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29870556
#SPJ4
Which accurately describes a push marketing tactic to help manufacturers sell more products?
O A manufacturer launches a new print advertising campaign in several magazines.
O A manufacturer incorporates social media to increase brand awareness.
O A manufacturer creates a new television advertising campaign.
O A manufacturer offers department stores incentives for selling its product.
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
In Colleges In Tennessee,New York,Florida,Illinois,Massachusetts Doesn't College Freshmen For Class Of 2028 For College Sleep In The Same Grade Dorm?
Different colleges and universities have different ways of assigning dorm rooms. Most colleges put new students in the same dorms or buildings, but each college might do things differently.
What is the FreshmenIt is necessary to consult the specific policies of the colleges in Tennessee, New York, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts to determine their dormitory assignment practices for freshmen in the Class of 2028.
Most colleges want freshmen to live together in specific dorms. We do this to help new students make friends, adjust to school, and feel like they fit in. Some places are only for first-year college students, like certain dorms, residence halls, or floors.
Read more about Freshmen here:
https://brainly.com/question/23100651
#SPJ1
Charlotte chambers and other oklahoma residents chartered a van in oklahoma from keemah charter, a louisiana corporation, to attend a basketball tournament in new mexico. While travelling from oklahoma to new mexico, the van stopped in texas. Chambers fell on the steps in the van and broke her ankle. She sued, claiming that keemah failed to maintain the van in a safe condition. Keemah contended that the plaintiff's carelessness caused her injury. Which of the following state's law should apply to the case? a. texas law should apply to the case because that is where the injury occurred. b. oklahoma law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was made. c. new mexico law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was performed.
d. louisiana law should apply to the case because keemah charter is a louisiana corporation.
Analyzing the state's law will be the application of the rules that can differentiate the rules of law. In this scenario, without specific information about the choice of law rules in each relevant jurisdiction, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, I can provide some general principles that may help in making the determination.
Typically, courts apply the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the case. Given the information provided, let's analyze each option:
a. Texas law should apply to the case because that is where the injury occurred.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the injury occurred should apply. While the injury happened in Texas, it does not necessarily mean that Texas law automatically applies.
b. Oklahoma law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was made.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was made should apply. If the contract between Charlotte Chambers and Charter was formed in Oklahoma, it could be argued that Oklahoma law should apply.
c. New Mexico law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was performed.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was performed should apply. If the primary purpose of the contract was transportation to and from New Mexico for the basketball tournament, it could be argued that New Mexico law should apply.
d. Louisiana law should apply to the case because Charter is a Louisiana corporation.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the defendant corporation is incorporated should apply. If Charter is indeed a Louisiana corporation, it could be argued that Louisiana law should apply. However, the law of the state of incorporation does not always automatically govern all aspects of a case.
To know more about state law
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
in this case, the court determined it had personal jurisdiction. did the court also have jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries?
Answer:
Explanation:
It is not possible to answer this question without more specific information about the case in question.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to exercise power over a particular individual or entity, such as the defendant in a lawsuit. It is based on a variety of factors, such as the defendant's presence or contacts within the jurisdiction, and is distinct from jurisdiction over property.
Jurisdiction over property, also known as in rem jurisdiction, refers to a court's authority to adjudicate disputes over specific property, regardless of who owns or possesses that property. In rem jurisdiction can be based on a variety of factors, such as the location of the property or the source of a particular claim.
Whether or not the court in the case in question had jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries would depend on the specific facts of the case and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. Without further information, it is impossible to say whether the court had jurisdiction over property as well as over the individuals involved in the case.
relationship between case law and common law
Answer:
They are practically the same thing and are used interchangably.
Explanation:
under the federal reserve act of 1913, the number of federal reserve districts established is
Under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, a total of twelve Federal Reserve districts were established across the United States.
Each district is served by a Federal Reserve Bank, which is responsible for implementing monetary policy, supervising and regulating banks within the district, and providing financial services to member banks. The districts were established based on geographic and economic considerations, with each district encompassing several states.
The number of districts has remained unchanged since their establishment, although the boundaries of each district have been adjusted over time to reflect changes in population and economic activity. Overall, the Federal Reserve system plays a critical role in maintaining the stability and soundness of the US banking system and the broader economy.
Visit here to learn more about Federal Reserve Act : https://brainly.com/question/29392381
#SPJ11
arthur watched over the shoulder of melinda, who was using her bank card at a local atm machine. arthur then used melinda's card number to get on the phone and order $1,000 worth of electronics. which of the following crimes does this constitute?
Answer: you didn’t list the options.
Explanation:
This constitutes the crime of credit card fraud. Arthur committed credit card fraud.
This action constitutes the crime of credit card fraud. By watching over Melinda's shoulder and using her card number to make unauthorized purchases, Arthur has engaged in fraudulent activity with the intention of gaining something of value (the electronics) without Melinda's consent. Credit card fraud is a serious offense that can result in severe penalties including fines and imprisonment, and it is important to protect personal information such as bank card numbers to prevent such crimes from occurring.
Learn more about imprisonment here:
https://brainly.com/question/3249826
#SPJ11
Full question:
Arthur watched over the shoulder of Melinda, who was using her bank card at a local ATM machine. Arthur then used Melinda's card number without her permission to make a phone order for $1,000 worth of electronics. Which of the following crimes does Arthur's actions constitute?
Credit card fraudIdentity theftUnauthorized access to financial information.A Texas “Under 21” ID or Driver's License cannot be used as proof of age.
Answer:
i think its false to be honest....sorry if incorrect
Check the "under 21 Until" date and as long as the date of birth shows the customer's age to be 21 years or older and the Driver's License is still valid, it is a valid ID to purchase alcohol.
Explanation:
sorry if this is wrong
but
Texas law does not state that a person over the age of 21 must provide proof of age for alcohol purchases. There is no specific form of ID considered “valid” under state law. You will not be charged with a crime if the minor misrepresents his / her age with an ID that is: Issued by a government agency.
In the private sector, hours of employment and conditions of employment are considered mandatory topics for bargaining. True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This statement is true. Employers and employees negotiate the demands presented by employees the mandatory subjects of which are wages and working hours.
a strict-liability tort occurs when a defendant acts with the intention of engaging in a specific act that ultimately results in injury. t/f
The given statement "a strict-liability tort occurs when a defendant acts with the intention of engaging in a specific act that ultimately results in injury." is false becuase a strict-liability tort occurs when a defendant is held responsible for their actions regardless of whether or not they intended to cause harm.
A strict liability tort is a type of tort that holds a defendant liable for harm caused by their actions, regardless of their intent. This means that the plaintiff does not have to demonstrate that the defendant intended to cause harm; instead, they must show that the defendant's actions resulted in harm.
This is a significant departure from other types of torts, such as negligence, which require that the plaintiff prove that the defendant acted with some level of intent or awareness. Strict liability torts are often applied in cases involving product liability, hazardous activities, and animal attacks.
You can learn more about strict-liability tort at
https://brainly.com/question/28842546
#SPJ11
Should it be more difficult or easier to impeach public officials and why
Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
the 1876 constitution was so well written, it is rare for anyone to ask if we might need a new one.truefalse
It is false to say that the 1876 constitution was so well written, it is rare for anyone to ask if we might need a new one.
Drafted stealthily by agents to the Constitutional Convention the late spring of 1876, this four-page report, endorsed on September 17, 1876, laid out the public authority of the US.
The Government Show assembled in the State House (Freedom Lobby) in Philadelphia on May 14, 1876, to reexamine the Articles of Confederation. Since the designations from just two states were at first present, the individuals dismissed from one day to another until a majority of seven states was gotten on May 25.
Through conversation and discussion it turned out to be clear by mid-June that, as opposed to revise the current Articles, the Show would draft an altogether new casing of government. All through the mid year, in shut meetings, the representatives discussed, and redrafted the articles of the new Constitution.
To know more about constitution,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/28857951
#SPJ4
What is habeas corpus please help due tommorrow
Answer:
Hi there! Answer is below :)
Explanation:
Habeas corpus was a law that was first introduced in Europe, to be more specific, Spain and Britain. This law gives an arrested person mandatory to appear before a judge and jury. It also requires the prosecutors to have evidence to make their point to jury.
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
What does “privilege” mean with respect to lawyer-client relationship and give an example
Answer:
i would think it would mean like its a privilege to be able to work and fight for someone? im not to sure tho.
Explanation:
Collected by the fbi and reported quarterly and annual, the what is considered to be most widely used source of national crime and delinquency staticis in the United States
The FBI compiles data on the number of reported crimes, which is then published in the Uniform Crime Report (UCR). Statistics from more than 17,000 police agencies are used to create the UCR.
The most popular source of data on national crime and delinquency. The FBI uses the UCR extensively to keep track of crimes and make decisions about policy. Since 1930, it has tracked information on seven crimes: serious assault, bur-glary, ra-pe, mur-der, and theft. The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey are two statistical programmes that the U.S. Department of Justice oversees to assess the scope.
To learn more about FBI, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/22974868
#SPJ1
When a product fails to perform as warranted, this is called a) contractual liability. O b) product malfunction. c) malicious manufacture. d) breach of warranty
I think it's d because an example of breach of warranty is: A salesman tells you that a washing machine makes no noise, but when you buy it, you find that it makes a lot of noise.
Hope this helps! Please give brainlist
18) ________ is a feature of law-governed society and involves having laws that are known and understood, along with the ability to appeal to higher authorities to ensure that the laws are applied correctly.
A) Liability
B) Due process
C) Responsibility
D) Accountability
E) The judicial system
A element of a society controlled by the law is due process, which entails having clear and well-understood laws as well as the right to appeal an incorrect application of the law to higher authorities.
In order to ensure that all of the person's legal rights are honored, due process of law requires the state to apply all relevant legal norms and principles. The strength of the law of the nation is balanced by due process, which also shields the individual from it.
The rule of law is violated when a government harms a person without strictly adhering to the letter of the law. This is known as a due process violation.
Learn more about Due process, from:
brainly.com/question/12176268
#SPJ4
1.
Question 1 of 2
Passing is permitted when a broken yellow or white line separates the lanes
Choose one
O A. No
OB. Yes
OC. Only during the day time.
Passing is not permitted when a broken yellow or white line separates the lanes. The answer is No. the correct option is A.
What is the rule of crossing?While changing lanes during driving a clear distance should be maintained with other vehicles in order to avoid a collision. When changing the lane it is important to see both sides of vehicles to avoid accidents.
If there are any broken yellow lines close to your driving lane, you may pass through them. There is no crossing between two solid yellow lines. Passing is permitted when there is a dashed yellow line.
Lanes with identical directions of movement are divided by white lines. Please confirm the times mentioned. Double yellow curb markings tell drivers there can never be any stopping.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Crossing lane, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29742462
#SPJ2