The statement that in the early years of his career as a minister, Jerry Falwell criticized civil rights activists and other religious leaders who engaged in political activism is false.
Jerry Falwell (1933 –2007) was an American Baptist pastor, televangelist, and conservative activist. Falwell is known as the founding pastor of the Thomas Road Baptist Church, which was a megachurch in Lynchburg, Virginia. He also established Lynchburg Christian Academy, Liberty University, and co-founded the Moral Majority. The Moral Majority emerged as one of the largest political lobby groups for evangelical Christians in the United States during the 1980s. Hence, the statement is false.
Learn more about Jerry Falwell:
https://brainly.com/question/15861675
#SPJ4
DESIGNED TO MEASURE HOW YOU VALUE CERTAIN LIFESTYLES AND REWARDS: Write a paragraph that on the question below as it relates to leadership style You often take the lead and direct others. You believe people should be paid based on how hard they work and what they accomplish. You would like to be rewarded in direct proportion to your performance. You believe that in the long run, good people win and bad people lose. You would be more motivated by financial rewards than by praise. You enjoy being in charge. Dishonesty should not be tolerated. It makes you angry when you know how to do something but no one wants to listen to you. One of your life’s goals is to be financially independent. Getting ahead should be based on performance and not politics. You would enjoy working on a sales commission rather than a straight salary. You would like a job that requires hard selling. Owning your own business has strong appeal for you. Everyone should be treated equally, and favoritism should be discouraged. You would enjoy managing a business
Based on your responses, it can be inferred that your leadership style leans towards being assertive, results-oriented, and driven by performance-based rewards.
You take initiative and enjoy directing others, believing in the importance of hard work and accomplishment as the basis for determining compensation. The idea of being rewarded in direct proportion to your performance resonates with you, as you find financial incentives to be motivating. Your leadership style is characterized by a preference for fairness, honesty, and equal treatment, rejecting favoritism or politics in the workplace.
It frustrates you when your knowledge and expertise are disregarded, highlighting your desire to contribute and have your input valued. Additionally, you aspire to financial independence and the idea of owning your own business holds a strong appeal. Managing a business aligns with your inclination for being in charge and having control over your work environment.
Overall, your leadership style embodies a results-driven, self-motivated, and independent approach, accompanied by a commitment to integrity and equal treatment of individuals within the organization.
To know more about Leadership, visit : brainly.com/question/28487636
#SPJ11
What is drug decriminalize
Explanation:
not charging those caught with small amounts of recreational drugs
Which input pane was used to generate Jonas' qualified retirement savings contributions credit?in blockworks
The input used to generate the Saver's Credit, also known as the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit, is the amount of eligible contributions made to a qualified retirement account such as an IRA or a 401(k) plan.
The Saver's Credit is a tax credit aimed at encouraging low- and moderate-income workers to save for their retirement. The credit is available to eligible taxpayers who make contributions to qualified retirement plans, including traditional and Roth IRAs, and employer-sponsored 401(k), 403(b), and SARSEP plans.
The credit is calculated based on a percentage of the contributions made up to a certain limit and is claimed on the taxpayer's federal income tax return. The amount of the credit ranges from 10% to 50% of the contribution, with the highest credit percentage going to taxpayers with the lowest incomes.
The question is incomplete, thus the answer is general.
Learn more about Retirement Savings brainly.com/question/25707827
#SPJ1
betty hunter, a patient at community health, fell out of bed. an incident report was created. betty's attorney is now seeking all records relevant to betty's fall. the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in:
According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in: medical records.
HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which was passed by the United States Congress. It includes a range of provisions that provide guidelines for how patient data can be protected and transmitted.
An incident report is a document used to describe an event that has happened within a healthcare facility, such as a fall. This report is important because it can provide valuable information to healthcare providers about how to prevent future accidents from occurring. Betty's incident report was created to document the circumstances surrounding her fall in the community health center.
Incident reports are not considered part of the official medical record because they are created to document safety and quality issues rather than for clinical purposes. Therefore, incident reports are usually not protected by HIPAA regulations and can be released to patients or their legal representatives upon request.
If the incident report is maintained in medical records, then it is likely to be protected by HIPAA. However, if the incident report is maintained separately from the medical records, then it is less likely to be protected from discovery by the patient or their legal representative. Therefore, the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in medical records.
For more such questions on incident report, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29635795
#SPJ11
do gangs add any value to a neighborhood or community why or why not
Gangs boost crime rates in neighborhoods and provide a poor model for local children. Despite the fact that they fail to complete their education, face employment challenges, engage in drug and alcohol abuse, or wind up in jail, they project an image of strength and respect.
Briefing:-Because of the devastation they can cause to others, communities are afraid of them.
What function do gangs in communities serve?Along with giving weapons and a sense of safety in numbers, or the knowledge that they have individuals who will fight alongside them if necessary, gangs can give its members a sense of protection (Decker & Van Winkle, 1996). Youth safety requirements may be met with the use of such provisions.
What are the top 4 causes for gang membership?Unstable or damaged home.
financial instability
low expectations and levels of education.
members of a family gang.
either one or both parents' neglect.
violence committed against children at home or in the neighborhood.
drug and/or alcohol addiction by one or both parents.
To Know more about neighborhoods
https://brainly.com/question/9679078
#SPJ1
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
icted of a gruesome crime, a defendant is sentenced to be executed. their lawyer immediately appeals but until another court overrules this decision, the defendant must await their execution date. what is this stage of the process referred to?
The stage of the process referred to in this scenario is typically called a "stay of execution."
A stay of execution is an order issued by a court or other legal authority that temporarily halts the implementation of a death sentence or other form of punishment.
In the context of a criminal trial, a stay of execution is typically granted when an appeal or other legal challenge is pending, or when there is a question about the legality or constitutionality of the sentence.
In the scenario you described, the defendant's lawyer has immediately appealed the verdict, and as a result, the defendant has been granted a stay of execution while the appeal is pending. This means that the defendant's execution date will be postponed until another court has had the opportunity to review the case and decide whether to uphold or overturn the original sentence.
Learn more about criminal trial here:
https://brainly.com/question/30314096
#SPJ4
A business with happy customers will build a good reputation, allowing it to attract top-level:
A. Prices
B. Employees
C. Marketing consultants
D. Research and development budgets
Answer:
Employees
Explanation:
Answer:
I think po B
Explanation:
Sana makatulong
Based on the following, what will be the amount of Inventory? Current Ratio = 2.6:1 Liquid ratio=1.5:1 Current Liabilities = 40,000.
Answer:
liqiud is a silolid
Explanation:
beacuese as big
What is the classification of a public laundry? Answer: ________________ Relevant BCA Clause(s) / justification: _______________________
A public laundry is classified as a Class 6 building under the Building Code of Australia (BCA). This means that it is a place for the sale of retail goods or the supply of services direct to the public.
The BCA defines a Class 6 building as "a building used for the sale of retail goods or the supply of services direct to the public, such as shops, restaurants, cafés, public laundries, hairdressers and showrooms."
Public laundries are included in this category because they provide a service to the public by washing and drying clothes.
The relevant BCA clause for public laundries is Clause A6.1.1, which states that "a Class 6 building must comply with the requirements of this Part." This means that public laundries must meet all of the fire safety, structural, and accessibility requirements that are set out in Part A6 of the BCA.
To learn more about goods here
brainly.com/question/342628
#SPJ11
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
Human beings are the only animal accountable before the law discuss in critical thinking apparoach
Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.
One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.
Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.
Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
slick or wet, low-traction surface conditions make it hard to control the speed and ____ of your vehicle. a. visibility b. condition c. direction d. crashworthiness
Slick or wet, reduced surface circumstances make it difficult to control your vehicle's speed and direction.
In criminal law, special circumstances are the conduct of the accused or the conditions in which a crime, notably homicide, was committed. Such considerations necessitate or permit a harsher punishment. Special circumstances are elements of the crime and must thus be established beyond a possible suspicion during the guilt phase of the trial. As such, they are officially distinct from aggravating circumstances, which are established during the punishment phase of the trial instead. In Californian, if a defendant has been convicted of the first murder and one of the 22 mentioned special circumstances is found to be true, the only available sentences are life in prison with no chance of parole or death.
Learn more about speed here
https://brainly.com/question/17768073
#SPJ4
identify and explain the eighth main types of cultural deferences
Answer:
1) Contextual Differences
2) Legal and Ethical Differences
3) Social Differences
4) Nonverbal Differences
5) Age Differences
6) Gender Differences
7) Religious Differences
Ability Differences
Explanation:
1) Contextual Differences– the Italian language is very literal, and in this American’s need to be aware of this difference. As Americans, we need to be sure to use proper pronouns, and also the correct usage of verbs. When translating from English to Italian, and visa versa, there is some grammatical elements lost, so it is key to understanding the loss in translations, and making up for them in pronouns and proper verb usage. Titles are very important, and in non-formal setting first names are okay. Italians rely more on nonverbal communication than verbal.
2) Legal and Ethical Differences– Italians are not like American’s in the sense that we follow laws and rules, and respect the authority. Italians tend to do whatever they feel is right and ethically correct, not worrying about what the government says is right and ethically correct. Racism is an ethical situation that Italy struggles with, along with sexual harassment. Although Italy has a bad reputation, overall they are not too terrible when it comes to crime.
3) Social Differences– Italians take marriage and family extremely serious. Divorce is only granted after 3 years of legal marriage, and most engagements are several years until education is finished, and a job is secured. Parents are very loyal to their children, and help them as much as possible. Families consistently visit each other, and most of the time it is an unexpected visit. Many people in Italy work with agriculture, making a living by farming and working for companies of the sort. Most other people who do not work with agriculture work for the government. Titles are very important, and on formal settings are usually the only want to address someone. When addressing someone older than you or with higher authority, you should never call them their formal name; until they have invited you to do so. If invited to a social setting, one should always bring a small gift of thanks, whether it be flowers or chocolates. When drinking wine at a dinner party, do not take a d
rink until the host has toasted to the occasion. If attending a meeting with an Italian, it is important to arrive early. When speaking on the phone, the person calling should always introduce themselves before starting the conversation.
4) Nonverbal Differences– In Italy, nonverbal communication is very impor
tant. A firm handshake, and good eye contact is highly important and looked upon. Touching each cheek and kissing the air is also a common form of greeting. If a person does not make eye contact, they are considered dishonest and hiding something. Image is everything, and they dress to their role. Also, Italians care little or not at all about personal space, and they consider close contact important. People of the same sex walk arm in arm together.
5) Age Differences– Italians are very respectful of people of all ages. They respect children and their educational success, as they do not have to pay for their education up to a certain age. College students are also thought highly of as they are considered to be furthering their lives by attending school. With such a focus on family, Italians also look highly on each other and elders. Italians respect each other in social, formal, and informal settings, no matter which age they are.
6) Gender Differences– According to a discussion board about US life vs. Italian life, woman are treated much better in Italy than in the US. They are respected more in school settings, and also in the community. They receive retirement pension, even if they are housewives. Students of both sexes are taken seriously, yet according to a professor, seem more reserved and need to be pushed a little more. Women are treated with a higher respect than in the US.
7) Religious Differences– The majority of Italians are Roman Christians, which like Catholics in America, are much grounded around their religious ways. They believe in one eternal God, and also heaven and hell. Their religious views are very much similar to American religious views. There are a few different religions practiced, but the majority is Catholics.
8) Ability Differences – The Italian’s are starting to emerge into the world business scene, however, they are more focused on small and medium businesses rather than large, world corporations. They’ve recently in the past 10 years switched to the Euro currency, which is helping to globalize them. They are becoming more technologically advanced. The government is also encouraging companies to merge together to make more large companies and fewer small companies.
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery. Why was this act a violation of both criminal and civil law
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
There are mainly two categories of law which are the criminal law and the civil law.
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery is both a violation of both criminal and civil law. Criminal law is a law that has to do with crimes while civil law is the law that has to do with private matters or dispute.
It is both a violation of both criminal and civil law because since Franklin intentionally killed two people, he can be charged with homicide in criminal court. Also, based on civil law, he can be sued for wrongful death.
How many amendments are there in the bill of rights?.
Answer:
10
Explanation:
a husband from state a filed a divorce action against his wife, a citizen of state b, in state a federal court. the husband asked the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. the couple lived in state b at all times during the marriage. the wife had never been to state a before the lawsuit was filed. the wife answered the husband's complaint without asserting any affirmative defenses or filing any additional motions. two years into the lawsuit, after discovery had been completed and four days before trial, the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the husband's claims.
If a husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court: C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?In this scenario, the wife is arguing that the court in State A does not have the authority or jurisdiction to hear the divorce case and divide the marital estate.
The motion to dismiss is being filed after two years into the lawsuit and just before the trial, which may indicate that the wife is trying to challenge the jurisdiction of the court at a late stage in the proceedings.
The outcome of this motion will depend on the specific laws and regulations of State A and the facts of the case. If the court agrees with the wife, it may dismiss the case, meaning the husband will have to file the divorce action in a court in State B. If the court denies the motion, it will proceed with hearing the case and dividing the marital estate.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about legal case here:https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
A husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court. In the action, the husband asks the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. The couple lived in State B at all times during the marriage. The wife had never been to State A before the lawsuit was filed. The wife answered the husband's complaint, asserting no affirmative defenses and filing no motions. Two years into the lawsuit - after discovery had been completed, and 4 days before trial - the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction over the husband's claims. May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?
A: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks personal jurisdiction.
B: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because she waived any affirmative defense by failing to raise it in her answer to her husband's complaint.
C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
D: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because her motion to dismiss was not timely.
It is illegal for a minor to: drink beer in the visible
What is your opinion on the recent voter bill? Do you believe Washington D.C. should be a state? Do you think anyone including those without identification be able to vote.
Answer:
yes I do think washington should be a state
Explanation:
I say this because there are a total of 50 states and if we take washington out it would be 49 and it doesnt make any sense to take washington out
legally acceptable ID has which characteristic?
(b) Characteristics of a legally acceptable ID: (1) Issued by a government agency; (2) Contains the name, date of birth, photograph, and physical description of the ID holder; and (3) A valid expiration date.
The legally acceptable ID has characteristics as issued by a government agency.
For official purposes, the most trustworthy and commonly recognized kind of identification is one that has been issued by the government. When confirming a person's identification, these IDs often carry a lot of weight and trust.
Government-issued identification documents sometimes have security holograms, one-of-a-kind serial numbers, official seals or emblems, and other components that make them challenging to copy or fabricate.
Learn more about identification, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29637546
#SPJ6
What happens first when a bill is introduced in the house?
Answer:
The House votes to approve or reject the bill. Than the bill goes back to the committee and they approve or make changes. It will g back and forth until the bill gets to the president. If the president accepts the bill, it becomes a law. If the president "vetoes" the bill, it goes all the way back to the starting line. All the houses are equal, and a bill may take years and still not become a law. It can take the rest of someone's life, it all just depends what the different houses think about the changes and acceptions or the bill.
Explanation:
According to the constitution a writ of habeas corpus may not be suspended under what conditions.
According to the constitution, a writ of habeas corpus may not be suspended under normal conditions unless there is a rebellion or invasion, and if the public safety requires it.
Writ of Habeas Corpus is a fundamental principle of the United States legal system. The Constitution states that habeas corpus is a crucial legal instrument for protecting individual freedom against arbitrary state power. The Constitution specifies that this right may only be suspended in cases of rebellion or invasion and when public safety requires it.
The writ of habeas corpus is an essential right because it protects individuals from arbitrary or unjustified imprisonment. The suspension of habeas corpus is usually a significant political event since it implies that the government is no longer bound by legal constraints to maintain law and order in society.
During a time of rebellion or invasion, the government may need to suspend the writ of habeas corpus to deal with the crisis effectively.
Learn more about writ of habeas corpus from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29748417
#SPJ11
the party who lost in the lower court and files the first appeal is called the
The party who lost in the lower court and files the first appeal is known as the appellant.
An appellant is a party who initiates an appeal to a higher court seeking to overturn or modify a decision made by a lower court. The appellant is also sometimes referred to as the petitioner or the appellant-petitioner. In the appellate court, the appellant is required to present arguments and evidence showing that the lower court made a legal or factual error that affected the outcome of the case. The opposing party in the appeal is called the appellee or respondent.
The appellant is the individual or entity that seeks to have a higher court review the decision made by a lower court, as they were not satisfied with the initial outcome.
Learn more about the appellant-petitioner: https://brainly.com/question/30350107
#SPJ11
What is the oversight function of the legislative department?
The oversight function of the legislative department refers to the power of the legislative branch to oversee and monitor the actions of the executive branch and ensure that it is acting within the limits of its authority and in the best interests of the public. This function involves conducting investigations, holding hearings, and requesting reports and information from executive agencies to ensure accountability and transparency. The oversight function is crucial in maintaining the balance of power and upholding the principles of democracy.
Oversight ensures accountability, transparency, and the proper functioning of the government.Here are some key aspects of the oversight function of the legislative department:
Checks and balances: Oversight serves as a system of checks and balances on the executive branch, ensuring that the government operates within the boundaries of the law and in the best interest of the public. It prevents abuses of power, corruption, and other misconduct by holding the executive branch accountable. Reviewing legislation and regulations: The legislative department reviews proposed legislation and regulations to ensure their compliance with constitutional principles, existing laws, and the needs and aspirations of the public. It examines the potential impacts of policies and regulations before they are implemented. Budgetary oversight: Legislatures play a crucial role in overseeing the budgetary process. They review and approve government budgets, ensuring that public funds are allocated appropriately and used efficiently. Legislators examine the spending priorities of the executive branch and assess the effectiveness of government programs. Conducting investigations: Legislatures have the authority to conduct investigations, often through committees or commissions, to examine issues of public concern, government malfeasance, or policy failures. Investigations can involve gathering evidence, subpoenaing witnesses, and conducting hearings to uncover information and hold officials accountable. Confirming executive appointments: In systems with a separation of powers, the legislative department often has the power to confirm or reject executive appointments, such as cabinet members, agency heads, and judges. This confirmation process ensures that qualified and suitable individuals are appointed to important positions in the government. Providing transparency and public access: The oversight function of the legislative department promotes transparency in government operations. Through public hearings, inquiries, and reporting, legislators provide information to the public, allowing citizens to understand how their government is functioning and make informed judgments.Overall, the oversight function of the legislative department acts as a critical mechanism to ensure that the executive branch remains accountable and responsive to the needs of the people. It is an essential aspect of democratic governance and helps maintain the balance of power within a government system.
To learn more about corruption, visit: https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ11
Qualified expenses for an eligible educator include all the following except:
Select one:
a. Equipment (computers & software)
b. Books & Supplies
c. Classroom materials
d. Home School supplies
The strict scrutiny and the rational basis tests are invoked under
A. The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
B. The Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
C. The Due Process Clause in the Fifth Amendment.
D. The Free Exercise Clause in the First Amendment.
Answer:
A. The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
From Brainly
referencing the scenario, describe the judicial power exercised by the court in the united states v. windsor case and explain why this power gives the supreme court the authority to take the action described.
The Supreme Court declared that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional and that the federal government cannot discriminate against married lesbian and homosexual couples.
"The judicial Power of the United Declares shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish," states Article III, Section I.
Although the Supreme Court is established by the Constitution, Congress has the authority to define how it is organized. Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any legal subject if it has jurisdiction, it rarely holds trials.
Instead, the Court's job is to interpret a law's meaning, decide whether a statute applies to a specific set of facts, or rule on how a law should be applied.
A same-sex couple whose marriage is now recognized by both of their states and the federal government.
To know more about judicial power:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
How does incorporation afect federalism? Do you feel that the Bill of Rights needed to be applied to the state
level?
Answer:
,,,,siskekkekemie Jemez eieAsk an Jesper please
Explanation: