Three year old max who is biologically male sees himself as a boy psychologists would see max as

The dispute over Spain and Portugal's competing claims to the Americas was settled by the Treaty of Tordesillas. This treaty was signed on June 7, 1494, in the Castilian town of Tordesillas by the Spanish Crown and the Portuguese Crown.

This treaty was an agreement between Spain and Portugal concerning their territorial rights in the newly discovered lands of the Americas and Africa. The treaty divided the world into two parts, with Spain receiving the majority of the Americas and Portugal receiving the majority of Africa.After the successful exploration of Christopher Columbus to America in 1492, the Spaniards wanted to claim the new land for themselves, but the Portuguese also wanted a piece of the new land. They agreed to allow the Pope to decide which country could claim which territories in the Americas. The Pope's decision was the Line of Demarcation of 1493 which granted Spain the right to claim most of the western lands while Portugal received the rights to the eastern lands.As the Portuguese began to explore the east coast of South America, they discovered that the coast extended much further south than they had thought. This brought them into direct conflict with the Spanish claims to the region, and so a new agreement had to be made. The Treaty of Tordesillas was signed in 1494 and it divided the world into two parts. Spain was given the land west of the line of demarcation, while Portugal was given the land east of the line.The treaty was beneficial for both Spain and Portugal as it allowed them to expand their empires into the Americas without any conflict between them. It also ensured that the two countries would not compete for the same territories in the future. However, the treaty did not satisfy other European countries who were also exploring the new lands in the Americas.The Treaty of Tordesillas played a vital role in the settlement of the dispute over Spain and Portugal's competing claims to the Americas. It granted Spain the rights to claim most of the western lands, while Portugal received the rights to the eastern lands. This treaty helped to avoid any conflict between the two countries and allowed them to expand their empires into the Americas peacefully.

To Know More about divided visit:

brainly.com/question/15381501

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

Answer:

as to say ima qustin sovler it is deflenly the 2

Explanation:

The merchants cover the vast area of the Silk Road in the large caravans.

Silk Route refers to the path through which the silk was carried from China to Western world and many regions of Asia. It was conducted at the time of the medieval ages between the Roman Empire and China.

Large caravans carried traders and merchants. They would be accompanied by numerous guards.

Defending against bandits was made easier when traveling in a large group like a caravan. Because a large portion of the road passed through desolate, difficult terrain, camels were frequently used as transportation.

Learn about Silk route here:

https://brainly.com/question/16243985\

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer: As new states were created, the issue of slavery threatened to pull the country apart. In 1820 the Missouri Compromise was passed to sort out this issue.

Explanation:

According to the question: the answer of a: the adoption of a containment policy and b: the emergence of the Red Scare and anti-communist sentiment.

(a) One impact of the Cold War on U.S. government foreign policy between 1945 and 1960 was the adoption of a containment strategy. The United States sought to prevent the spread of communism and Soviet influence, leading to a more interventionist approach in international affairs. This resulted in policies such as the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and the formation of military alliances like NATO. The containment strategy shaped U.S. foreign policy decisions, including military interventions in Korea and Vietnam, and influenced the allocation of resources towards defense and intelligence activities.

(b) One impact of the Cold War on American society between 1945 and 1960 was the emergence of the Red Scare and anti-communist sentiment. The fear of communist infiltration and subversion led to widespread anxieties and suspicions, fueling a period of intense political and social repression. This was manifested in various ways, including the rise of McCarthyism, where Senator Joseph McCarthy led investigations into alleged communist sympathizers within the government and entertainment industry. Loyalty oaths, blacklisting, and surveillance measures were implemented, creating a climate of fear and stifling freedom of speech and political dissent. The Red Scare had a profound impact on American society, shaping public discourse, political discourse, and individual lives.

Learn more about wars:

https://brainly.com/question/197175

#SPJ11

Two ideas behind the idea of Islamic Holy War are:

In Islam, there are two main reasons why a holy war would be fought. The first is to defend Islam as a religion. Muslims take this reason very seriously because a fight for Islam is a fight for Allah and so no expenses will be spared.

Another reason or idea behind Islamic Holy War is for self - defence. Islam makes it known that its people should not be attacked unjustly and if they are, they are free to defend themselves.

Find out more on Islamic Holy War at https://brainly.com/question/506012

#SPJ1

Edict of Milan is an edict that enduringly established religious toleration for Christianity within the Roman Empire.

Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in 313 CE, which decriminalized Christianity and decreed that Roman citizens had the liberty to observe the religion of their choice, and particular mode of worship. Emperor Constantine Signs the Edict of Milan in which he reclaimed "Religious Toleration" and for the reduction of persecution of Christians. Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan that take Christianity 10 years later. It had flattered the official religion of the Roman Empire. Milan was the agreement to treat Christians good within the Roman Empire.

So we can conclude that The Edict of Milan is one of the earliest declarations of religious freedom by a governing body. Signed by Constantine I and Augustus.

Learn more about Milan here: https://brainly.com/question/28262192

#SPJ1

Upon arriving in Korea, Taoism was greeted with open arms and quickly gained popularity among the Korean people. Taoism, which originated in China, found fertile ground in Korea due to the cultural and philosophical similarities between the two countries.

Taoism emphasizes harmony with nature and the importance of balance in all aspects of life, which resonated deeply with the Korean people's traditional values and beliefs.

Taoist ideas and practices were also influential in shaping Korean culture, particularly in the areas of art, literature, and medicine. The concept of yin and yang, for example, became an essential part of Korean aesthetics, influencing everything from the design of traditional Korean houses to the composition of poetry and music.

However, while Taoism had a significant impact on Korean culture and society, it never replaced Korea's traditional religions, such as Buddhism and Confucianism. Instead, Taoism blended with these other belief systems to create a unique religious landscape in Korea.

Overall, the arrival of Taoism in Korea was a pivotal moment in the country's history, shaping its culture and society in profound ways that are still evident today.

Learn more about Korea here:

https://brainly.com/question/13946779

#SPJ11

Answer:

Kim Jong-il

At the 6th WPK Congress in 1980, his oldest son Kim Jong-il was elected to be a Presidium member and chosen to be his successor.

Answer:

See the Explanation Please!

Explanation:

During the classical period, trade played a significant role in the economic growth and development of the Gupta, Mauryan, Rome, Greece, Han, and Qin empires. Here are some positive and negative effects of trade during this period:

Positive Effects of Trade:

Economic Growth: Trade allowed the empires to expand their economies, as it created new markets and opportunities for goods and services. This resulted in increased production, specialization, and wealth creation.

Cultural Exchange: Trade facilitated the exchange of ideas, beliefs, and cultural practices, leading to the spread of knowledge and understanding of different cultures.

Technological Advances: Trade led to the exchange of new technologies, such as paper-making, silk production, and iron-smelting, which helped to improve production and manufacturing processes.

Infrastructure Development: Trade required the development of transportation networks, such as roads, canals, and harbors, which helped to improve the overall infrastructure of the empires.

Negative Effects of Trade:

Economic Dependence: Trade could create a dependence on foreign goods, which could lead to vulnerability in times of scarcity or conflict.

Conflict and War: Competition for resources and markets could lead to conflicts and wars between empires, disrupting trade and causing instability.

Social Inequality: The benefits of trade were not always distributed equally, leading to social inequality and disparities between different classes and regions.

Environmental Degradation: Increased production and transportation could lead to environmental degradation, such as deforestation, soil erosion, and pollution.

Overall, trade during the classical period had both positive and negative effects, which depended on the specific context and circumstances of each empire. However, trade was a significant driver of economic growth, cultural exchange, and technological advances during this period.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

According to my research, "Before a bill can become a law, it must be approved by the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, and the President." of those answers provided, A is the only one that fits. If you're still having trouble, I'd suggest looking at the How A Bill Becomes a Law song by Schoolhouse Rock, which is pretty catchy, and explains how a bill becomes a law pretty well. Good Luck!

Answer:

Instead of giving jobs to those who are from nobility and such, giving jobs based on exams proves the person is qualified for the job.

Explanation:

The First Wave is your Susan B Anthony/Marie Stopes era stuff, seeking to redress a variety of manifest injustices, most notably the right to vote. It started in the 19th century and could be said to have ended with the right to vote in the 1920s (in the US).

The Second Wave started in the 1960s, though "feminism" never really stopped from the First Wave. This was the Betty Friedan/Gloria Steinem era; it was also called "Women's Liberation". It focused on expanding women's roles from the traditional wife-and-mother thing to, well, everything else: the right to equal pay for equal work (and in any job), the right to do what they wanted with their bodies, an end to all sorts of sexism and discrimination. I would say that it ended with the failure of the Equal Rights Amendment, part of an anti-feminist backlash that eventually turned to infighting. It was, however, hugely successful in advancing the rights of women to be treated equally in work, in politics, at school, and in society at large.

The Third Wave is more nebulous. It doesn't have a strong legislative agenda, and the key players are less likely to be household words. It could be said to have begun as soon as the Second Wave ended, trying to pursue remaining legal injustices, but it seems to me to be more about expanding and questioning received notions of gender and gender roles. It is more abstract and less politically focused; it's more academic and post-modern. I'd say that the political aspects of it are really Second Wave feminism continuing to work on the remaining problems.

The Fourth Wave is a Quora board. It's not really a broader movement at all (yet), except as an attempt to try to get past some of the divisiveness and lack of focus that marked Third Wave feminism. It seeks to solve the remaining very real issues that gender still leaves in our nation, as well as the rest of the world, much of which still hasn't benefited from the gains of the First Wave.

False.sister exchange, where the sister of the groom married the brother of the bride in a double ceremony, was the not the ideal marriage arrangement for owens valley paiute

Sister exchange was a traditional marriage arrangement among some Native American groups, but it was not specific to the Owens Valley Paiute. Additionally, the practice varied widely among different tribes and was not universally accepted or practiced. In sister exchange, two men would marry two women who were sisters, and the two women would move into the households of their respective husbands. This practice helped to establish and reinforce social ties between families and communities, and it also helped to ensure that women were provided for in the event that their husbands died or were unable to provide for them. However, as with any cultural practice, it is important to recognize that sister exchange was not universally practiced or viewed as ideal by all members of the Owens Valley Paiute or any other group that may have engaged in the practice.

Learn more about Sister exchange here:

https://brainly.com/question/10438779

#SPJ11

The Franks were the Germanic people that settled in what is now France. The Franks were a confederation of West Germanic tribes who established in the area between the third and fourth century.

They finally built a formidable empire that included much of modern-day France, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Clovis I (c. 466-511) of the Franks converted to Christianity, and his kingdom became the hub of Christianity in the West. The Frankish monarchy ruled the region for several centuries, and their language,The Franks were the Germanic people that settled in what is now France. The Franks were a confederation of West Germanic tribes who established in the area between the third and fourth century. Old French, eventually became France's main language. The word "France" comes from the Franks.

learn more about fourth century.   here:

https://brainly.com/question/3942763

#SPJ4

Answer:

b) by dumping shipments of tea into the harbor

Explanation:

The American colonists protested the Tea Act of 1773 by dumping shipments of tea into the harbor.

On November 5, 1940 Franklin D. Roosevelt broke a long-held precedent—one that started with George Washington—when he became the first president elected to a third term. Roosevelt would go on to vie for, and win, yet a fourth term, taking office again on January 20, 1945.

FDR was the first, and last, president to win more than two consecutive presidential elections and his exclusive four terms were in part a consequence of timing. His election for a third term took place as the United States remained in the throes of the Great Depression and World War II had just begun. While multiple presidents had sought third terms before, the instability of the times allowed FDR to make a strong case for stability.

“You have economic-domestic issues and you have foreign policy with the outbreak of World War II in 1939,” says Barbara Perry, professor and director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “And then you have his own political viability—he had won the 1936 election with more than two-thirds of the popular vote.”

Eventually U.S. lawmakers pushed back, arguing that term limits were necessary to keep abuse of power in check. Two years after FDR’s death, Congress passed the 22nd Amendment, limiting presidents to two terms. Then amendment was then ratified in 1951.

At the time of FDR’s third presidential run, however, “There was nothing but precedent standing in his way,” says Perry. “But, still, precedent, especially as it relates to the presidency, can be pretty powerful.”

Other U.S. Presidents Who Tried and Failed to Win a Consecutive Third Term

According to the National Constitution Center, most of the framers of the Constitution were against term limits, and, although amendments seeking to enforce them were proposed some 200 times between 1796 and 1940 without being adopted, most two-term presidents followed Washington’s precedent in not seeking reelection for a third time.

Still, some had tried. Ulysses S. Grant lost a third campaign in 1880, when James Garfield clinched the Republican nomination. Theodore Roosevelt lost his bid at a third nonconsecutive term in 1912 to William Howard Taft (he had previously served out the remainder of President William McKinley's term and then won reelection). And Woodrow Wilson lost the Democratic nomination in 1920. Harry Truman, who succeeded FDR after his death, was president when the 22nd Amendment passed and so was exempt from the new rule. Truman campaigned for a third term in 1952, but withdrew after losing in the New Hampshire primary.

Roosevelt’s campaign for a third term took place as the United States had not yet entered World War II, and the president was still trying to hold the line in an isolationist pattern.

“He was trying to guide us along to try to keep Britain afloat with things like lend-lease,” Perry says. “That obviously was preying on his mind and he didn’t think that the U.S. should ‘change horses in midstream’ as this war was building towards what he knew would eventually be our full-fledged intervention in both the European and Pacific theaters.”

Roosevelt’s defeat of Republican challenger Governor Alf Landon of Kansas was a rout—the fourth-largest electoral vote margin ever. His 1940 win against Republican businessman Wendell Willkie wasn’t quite as impressive, but he still won 55 percent of the popular vote, and took the electoral vote 449 to 82.

Republicans Led the Drive for Presidential Term Limits

This photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt seated at his desk was the last color image of him before the announcement of his death.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Of course, not everyone was on Roosevelt’s side. The National Constitution Center notes that his decision to run for a third term resulted in key Democratic supporters and advisors leaving his campaign.

Some political buttons from the time read “FDR Out at Third,” and Perry notes that despite his popularity, one-third of Americans, particularly business people and those with means, still voted against him. They argued he was taking America down the road of socialism.

“Famously, there were people who would refuse to speak of him by name and would call him ‘That Man,’” Perry says. “But he knew the popular vote and the electoral vote were on his side. He wanted to see us through the two greatest catastrophes of the 20th century and he succeeded.”

Term Limits Were Set to Guard Against Tyrannical Rule

In 1944, according to the National Constitution Center, term-limit talk again came into focus. Republicans were at the forefront of the movement, though many Democrats agreed with the eight-year precedent set by Washington to guard against tyrannical rule.

“Four terms or 16 years is the most dangerous threat to our freedom ever proposed,” Thomas Dewey, Roosevelt’s Republican opponent, said in a 1944 speech.

According to Zimmerman, the fourteen points, General John J. Pershing, and the sinking of the Lusitania were all connected to World War I.so correct option in given question is A.World War I

In his note, Zimmerman made reference to a covert exchange of messages between Mexico and Germany that Britain had decoded. The Lusitania incident, in which Germany destroyed the British ship Lusitania in 1915, is referred to as the "sinking of the Lusitania." An American commander in World War I was General John J. Pershing. The President Woodrow Wilson Peace Principles were outlined in fourteen points.

To know more about Zimmerman visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30380748

#SPJ4

The Russian soldiers attacked the Polish-Lithuanian-Latvian-Prussian people because they were opposed to Hitler's rule. At the time, Hitler and Stalin had a non-aggression pact, but it did not last long. In 1941, the German-Soviet war broke out, leading the Soviet forces to occupy the lands of the former Soviet Union. The Polish-Lithuanian-Latvian-Prussian people were caught in the middle of this conflict and were therefore targeted by the Soviets.

It is unclear which specific event or time period you are referring to, as the history of Russian-Polish-Lithuanian-Latvian-Prussian relations is long and complex. However, it is important to note that international conflicts and alliances are rarely black and white, and there are often multiple factors at play.In general, the Soviet Union (of which Russia was a part) had a complicated relationship with Nazi Germany during World War II. While they were initially allies, they later became enemies and fought against each other. However, the Soviet Union was also interested in expanding its own power and influence, and sometimes invaded neighboring countries in pursuit of this goal.In terms of specific conflicts involving Polish, Lithuanian, Latvian, and Prussian people, there have been numerous historical events that have taken place over the centuries. Some of these conflicts may have been related to World War II and the Soviet Union's attempts to expand its sphere of influence, while others may have been entirely unrelated. Without more specific information, it is impossible to say why Russian soldiers may have attacked people from these regions if they were against Hitler.

For more such questions on Hitler

https://brainly.com/question/21835685

#SPJ11

Based on the way they governed them, they viewed them as self-governing colonies who were loyal to the British crown.

This policy was based on the notion that the colonies would not rebel against the crown. It is therefore safe to say that the Brits viewed the colonies as self-governing as they didn't do much governing themselves.

Find out more on British policies at the time at https://brainly.com/question/929403.

The largest structures in Western Europe throughout the Middle Ages were Cathedrals .

In the Middle Ages, the single most important organization in Western Europe was the church . The Church had a huge say in the way that society was to be run, and in their own affairs as well .

The Church was so powerful that state budgets were used to construct huge cathedrals such that the Cathedrals of Western Europe were the largest structures in Western Europe at the time .

Find out more on Cathedrals at https://brainly.com/question/1356775

#SPJ1

Answer:

Religious observance in China grows, in the Chinese Communist Party , primarily made up of Chinese buddhists, followed by Protestants, deliver social services to the poor amid soaring inequality in China.

Explanation:

Yes, religious observance in china is growing in Chinese Communist Party, made up of chinese buddhists. I hope this answer helps you!

Answer:

Religious observance in China grows, in the Chinese Communist Party , primarily made up of Chinese buddhists, followed by Protestants, deliver social services to the poor amid soaring inequality in China.

Explanation:

Yes, religious observance in china is growing in Chinese Communist Party, made up of chinese buddhists. I hope this answer helps you!

Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/16536345#readmore

Explanation:

Answer:

C. 9th Century BCE

Explanation:

Given that based on the formation of the calendar we are utilizing, the 1st Century started from year 1 to the first 100 years. This is based on the principle that there was nothing like year zero. Thereby the 2nd Century began from and lasted between the years 101 to 200.

Therefore, it is inferred that for example for the 9th Century B.C.E. we are citing the years 900 to 801 B.C.E.

Hence, for the year 893 B.C.E., we have 9th century BCE.

The priests helped to keep the gods happy and they were servants of the gods because they took care of them. When the priest would go into the temple, they would do different rituals such as lighting a torch, anointing statues, putting perfume or oil on the statues and praying.

hope this helps :)

Answer:

Because, they keep mummies of royals over there for preservation

Answer:

The British POV: American colonists

American Pov:British colonists

Explanation:

American point of view it was the British at fault as they attacked "innocent"colonists without any firearms.
British point of view it was the colonists fault as they started to attack the British soldiers just to make a scene
The massacre wasn't really a massacre as the colonists were just looking for a reason to separate from the British