The Less affluent the complainant, the more likely a patrol officer is to use formal procedures to report and investigate a crime. Option C
Research studies have shown that patrol officers tend to use more formal procedures when dealing with crimes reported by individuals who belong to lower socioeconomic classes. This is because individuals from less affluent backgrounds are generally viewed as being less credible by law enforcement officers due to their limited resources, lack of social status, and limited access to legal representation.
Moreover, it has been found that patrol officers tend to use less formal procedures when dealing with crimes reported by individuals who are older. This is because older individuals are often viewed as being more credible due to their life experience and perceived wisdom. In contrast, younger individuals are often viewed as being less credible due to their lack of life experience and perceived naivety.
It is important to note that these findings are not definitive, and that there are many factors that can influence how patrol officers respond to crimes reported by individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds. However, they do provide valuable insight into the ways in which law enforcement officers interact with different segments of the population, and can be used to inform efforts to improve the fairness and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Therefore option C is correct.
For more such questions on report visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ11
according to research, how many decisions does a driver in the city have to make every mile?
According to research, a driver in the city has to make about 20 decisions every mile. These decisions range from choosing the correct lane to merge into adjusting speed and direction to avoid collisions or accidents.
These decisions can be affected by various factors such as weather conditions, time of day, and road conditions, which can make driving in the city more challenging. Studies have shown that with experience, drivers tend to make better decisions and develop a more intuitive sense of how to navigate city streets.
However, it is important for drivers to remain focused and alert to avoid making mistakes or getting into accidents, especially in busy or congested areas.
To know more about weather conditions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30127104
#SPJ11
I keep trying to sign up,but it keeps saying "I'm sorry but we cant sign you up right now" i think they wrote that? I don't know but they wrote something like that
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
Question 1
0 / 0.5 pts
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is generally
covered by a state's "open records" law and all of the
documentation from ADR proceedings are therefore
public records.
True
False
Public Administrators often have what interaction
with civilians?
A. administer punishments for them
B. do not engage with them much
C. work face to face
arbitrators uniformly insist that strict rules of due process be adhered to when management investigates disciplinary actions at work. t/f
Arbitrators do indeed uniformly insist that strict rules of due process be followed when management investigates disciplinary actions at work.
This is because, in order to ensure fairness and prevent any unjust disciplinary actions, employees have a right to certain protections during an investigation.
To give a more detailed explanation, these protections can include the right to a timely and clear notice of the allegations being investigated, the right to have a representative or union official present during the investigation, the right to review any evidence or witness statements being used against them, and the right to a fair and impartial decision-maker. Failure to follow these rules can result in a challenge to the disciplinary action and potentially lead to it being overturned.
The statement that arbitrators uniformly insist on strict rules of due process during management investigations of disciplinary actions at work is true. It is important for both management and employees to understand and adhere to these rules to ensure fairness and avoid any potential legal challenges. This has been a long answer, but I hope it was helpful.
For more information on Arbitrators kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/29493880
#SPJ11
What is the structure of the municipal government
Answer:
\(\color{Blue}\huge\boxed{Answer} \)
Mayor and council system, municipal government in which a locally elected council is headed by a mayor, either popularly elected or elected by the council from among its members. In strict usage, the term is applied only to two types of local governmental structure in the United States.
Which system of government is most likely to feature legislative and
executive branches with separate powers that are equal?
PLEASE HELP ME QUICKLY
Answer:
presidential
Explanation:
Answer:
I think it's presidental
Explanation:
The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school student whose locker was searched after school officials had reason to believe she was distributing drugs and cigarettes. She was found guilty and sentenced to a one-year probation. TLO appealed the decision all the way to the Supreme Court, which initially decided that her 4th Amendment rights (which protect a person’s home, belongings and body from being searched without just cause) had been violated. However, upon re-arguing the case, “the Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was reasonable under the circumstances”.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s final decision or their initial? Why or why not? In your answer, discuss the Fourth Amendment, how it applies to this case, and which verdict you agree with (the initial or final verdict).
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
T/F to dissolve a marriage, a court needs: to dissolve a marriage, a court needs: in rem jurisdiction personal jurisdiction of both spouses subject-matter jurisdiction
The statement is true because in order for a court to dissolve a marriage, it needs to have both in rem jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction of both spouses, as well as subject-matter jurisdiction.
In rem jurisdiction refers to the court's authority over the marriage itself, which is usually determined by the location where the marriage was performed or where the couple resides.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority over the individuals involved, meaning that the court must have the power to make decisions that will affect both spouses. Finally, subject-matter jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to hear cases related to the dissolution of marriage.
Without all three types of jurisdiction, a court cannot legally dissolve a marriage.
Learn more about marriage https://brainly.com/question/31599141
#SPJ11
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on.
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on the corporation's registered agent.
Complaints could also be shared among FCC bureaus and offices for further review and possible investigation. The court fee is Rs 5,000 and also the demand draft should be within the name of The Registrar, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
File a complaint together with your local consumer protection office or the state agency that regulates the corporation. Notify the higher Business Bureau (BBB) in your area about your problem. One good option is to file a complaint with the higher Business Bureau (BBB).
The BBB helps consumers settle disputes associated with sales, contracts, customer service, complaint warranties, billings, and refunds per annum. It accepts complaints whether or not the corporation that's harmed you doesn't belong to the higher Business Bureau.
learn more about complaint: https://brainly.com/question/24821518
#SPJ4
computer science was banned in 1999 because of what hacking program?
Answer:
Explanation:
computer fraud
Suggest the scenarios that would prove the Hooman Khanloo's (appellant) NON-EXCLUSIVE use of room No. 1109
According to the evidence presented in the case, Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for an extended period of time and had made significant investments in the room. This evidence is significant because it supports the appellant's claim to the property and his argument that he had the right to continue using the room.
What was the case of Dato ArRahman all about?Dato ArRahman's case involves a dispute over a property in Kuala Lumpur's Platinum Park. One of the key pieces of evidence in the case is related to Hooman Khanloo, the appellant in the case, having exclusive use of room No. 1109.
Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for a period of time, according to the evidence presented in the case. According to the evidence, the appellant was the only person who had access to and authority over the room.
The evidence also indicates that Hooman Khanloo had lived in the room for some time and had made significant changes to make it his own. Furthermore, the evidence shows that Hooman Khanloo had been paying the room's rent and using it for personal and business purposes.
Read more about Dato ArRahman
brainly.com/question/31123468
#SPJ1
What are the benefits and drawbacks of giving judges wide discretion to determine the sentence of individual offenders?
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president biden relating to what kind of debt?.
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president Biden relating to student loan forgiveness plan of debt.
On the same day that a judge dismissed a Republican-led lawsuit by six states contesting the loan-forgiveness scheme, a U.S. appeals court temporarily stopped President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in college student debt.The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered an immediate stay prohibiting any student debt discharge under the program until the court resolves on the states' request for a longer-term injunction while the ruling against them is reviewed.While the six Republican-led states posed "important and significant challenges to the debt relief plan," U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey in St. Louis dismissed their complaint on Thursday, claiming they had the proper legal standing to prosecute the case.Thus the answer is student loan forgiveness plan.
Refer here to learn more about federal appeals court: https://brainly.com/question/24978344
#SPJ4
Is the Supreme Court a de facto lawmaker? Why, or why not?
No, the Supreme Court is not a de facto lawmaker. The supreme court only interprets the laws.
Although the Supreme Court has the authority to interpret the law and render decisions that set legal precedents it does not have the authority to enact new laws. The legislative branch of government is in charge of that. The Supreme Court can only interpret the Constitution and apply existing laws. it cannot pass new legislation or change existing laws.
Supreme courts responsibility is to make sure that the law is applied fairly and consistently to overturn any laws that are determined to be unconstitutional. The parliament makes the laws in accordance with the needs in the society and the supreme court can interpret these laws to give judgements.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ4
If the research participant is a minor (under the age of 18), which of the following must occur before
the individual can participate in the research study?
The following must occur before an underage individual can participate in the research study:
the parent/legal guardian must give permission for the minor to participate.the minor must agree to participate in the research.What is a research study?This refers to the systematic, rigorous and critical investigation that aims to answer questions.
Any research participant that is above 18 years is considered a non-minor and can participate in any kind of research study without seeking consent from guardians/parents.
Read more about research study
brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
Crime is believed to be a product of transitional neighborhoods that manifest value conflict according ________ theory.
Crime is believed to be a product of transitional neighborhoods that manifest value conflict according to Social structure theory.
What is manifest?The idea of manifesting love advises that you hold room for it until you're at ease and content with your existence without love rather than frantically trying to fill the hole.
Transitional areas that exhibit social disarray and value conflict are a source of crime. Crime rates are influenced by the tensions and issues that are present in urban social life and groups, such as fear, unemployment, decline, and the siege mentality.
According to societal theories, hunger and other issues in communities as well as financial and other structural issues in civilization as a whole are the root causes of crime.
Learn more about manifest, Here:
brainly.com/question/15205517
#SPJ2
Puffing _______.
a. creates an express warranty
b. is making statements of fact about a product
c. is illegal under federal law
d. is making obvious and lawful exaggerations about a product
e. none of the above
Answer:
Puffing is illegal under federal law.
Explanation:
Puffing and commendation of goods do not create an express warranty, nor does as affirmation of the value of the goods. However, leaving your car running, unattended, to warm it up in cold weather is called "puffing" and it's illegal in many places
What percentage of bills are made into laws each year?
Answer:
25%
Explanation:
A bill can be introduced in either chamber of Congress by a senator or representative who sponsors it. ... The president can approve the bill and sign it into law or not approve (veto) a bill. If the president chooses to veto a bill, in most cases Congress can vote to override that veto and the bill becomes a law.
Answer:
25%
Explanation:
Have a great day
What are the basic fingerprint patterns?
Answer: Answer is below <3
Explanation: There are eight different kinds of fingerprint patterns, such as radiatal loop, ulnar loop, double loop, central pocket loop, plain arch, tented arch, plain whorl and accidental.
please give brainliest if I’m correct! Tyty <33
How did William Blackstone influence the Constitution?
William Blackstone advised the Founding Fathers of the USA to understand the value of common law.
Blackstone's work had a profound impact on the ideology that led to the American Revolution and the subsequent drafting of the United States Constitution.
Commentary has been frequently cited by US courts as a source for Common His Law.
The purpose of Blackstone's commentary on English law was to provide a readable source of common law for most people.
Government policies and practices should therefore also be implemented in harmony with this power. In other words, governments should not be allowed to restrict individuals' freedom of choice and action.
To learn more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133256
#SPJ4
Though high-profile business bankruptcies such as Sports Authority and Radio Shack dominate the news, over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals. T/F
It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
What is bankruptcy filings?A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.
Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.
In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
Read more about bankruptcy filing
brainly.com/question/26392690
Task 1: Recording the Interviews
In this activity, you will evaluate the argument of the institutional anomie theory by conducting interviews with a school administrator and a working couple who has two children. Record the interviews in a question-and-answer format.
Task 2: Summarizing the Interviews
In this task, you will summarize your findings with respect to both the interviews.
Task 3: Evaluating the Findings
In this task, you will evaluate whether your findings conform to the institutional anomie theory, in which the focus on money deprives these "institutions" from performing their functions of deterring criminal activity.
Task 1: Recording the Interviews:In this activity, two interviews are conducted in a question-and-answer format, with the aim of evaluating the argument of the institutional anomie theory. The two interviews are as follows:A school administratorWorking couple with two children
Task 2: Summarizing the Interviews:After conducting the interviews in Task 1, the next step is to summarize the findings. This involves a brief review of the responses given by the interviewees.The working couple with two children stated that they prioritize financial stability for their family, which is why they both work full-time. When it comes to discipline, they enforce it with the children when necessary. They also stated that they have rules set for the children to follow and that they keep a close watch on them to ensure they follow them.The school administrator, on the other hand, stated that his school values discipline and focuses on instilling it in its students. He acknowledged that parents also have an important role in shaping a child’s discipline and values. He also talked about the need for schools to keep up with changes in the society and the importance of involving parents in school programs.
Task 3: Evaluating the Findings:In this task, the evaluation of the findings with respect to the institutional anomie theory is done. The institutional anomie theory states that the focus on money deprives these "institutions" from performing their functions of deterring criminal activity. Based on the interviews conducted, it can be seen that both the school administrator and the working couple place a high value on discipline in their respective institutions.The working couple’s emphasis on financial stability does not necessarily reflect the institutional anomie theory. In addition, the school administrator acknowledged that schools and parents play a critical role in shaping children’s discipline and values. This further demonstrates that the theory does not apply to all institutions.In conclusion, after conducting interviews with a school administrator and a working couple who has two children, it can be concluded that both institutions value discipline, which does not conform to the institutional anomie theory.
To know more about interviews visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29104623
#SPJ11
WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST!
What Enlightenment ideal does this quote show? "That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government .
Declaration of Independence 1776
A.stare decusis
B. federalism
C. separation of powers
D. socal contract
Answer:
Its D. social contract
Explanation:
Just did the quiz and C was incorrect
1. What is a Perimeter?
the distance around the edge of a shape
Two equal forces act in opposite directions on object A. Two unequal forces act in opposite directions on object B. If these are the only forces acting on objects A and B.
since the early 1990s, what has been the trend in reported crime rates in the united states?
Since the early 1990s, the trend in reported crime rates in the United States has been decreasing. In the 1990s, the U.S. experienced a significant increase in crime rates, particularly in violent crimes such as homicide, robbery, and assault.
However, over the past few decades, there has been a noticeable decline in these rates. This trend can be attributed to various factors such as increased policing efforts, changes in sentencing laws, and a decrease in drug-related offenses. Additionally, advancements in technology have allowed for more efficient and effective law enforcement practices, such as surveillance cameras and predictive policing. While crime rates in the U.S. have not reached historical lows, the decreasing trend is promising. However, it is important to note that crime rates can vary by region and demographic, and further efforts must be made to address disparities and prevent crime from occurring in the first place.
To know more about crime rates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9548840
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP!!! IT'S URGENT
Answer:
A,BC=Economic policy
D=Social policy
E=foreign policy
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Economic
2. Economic
3. Economic
4. Social
5. Foreign
Explanation:
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation: