The sum of an integer and 2 times the next consecutive integer is -22 Find the value of the lesser known integer

Answer: θ≈48,81°.

Step-by-step explanation:

\(sin\theta=\frac{8}{\sqrt{113}}\\sin\theta } =\frac{8*\sqrt{113} }{\sqrt{113}*\sqrt{113} } \\sin\theta=\frac{8*\sqrt{113} }{113} \\sin\theta\approx0,75258\\\theta\approx48,81^0.\)

Good luck an' have a nice day!

After solving the given equations the answer is an Infinite solution. Hence, option A is correct

Mathematical expressions with two algebraic symbols on either side of the equal (=) sign are called equations.

This relationship is illustrated by the left and right expressions being equal to one another. The left-hand side equals the right-hand side is a basic, straightforward equation.

As per the given equation in the question,

8 + 4x = 2x + 8 + 2x

Firstly, let's write the given equation in a simplified manner,

8 + 4x = 8 + 4x  

As we can see that LHS = RHS, which means that both equations are the same then which means they will give infinite solutions.

To know more about equation:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

The correct statements are:

b. The population variances for each of the cells should be equal (i.e., there is homogeneity of variance).

c. The populations from which the samples are taken for a two-way ANOVA must be distributed normally.

In a two-way ANOVA, there are several assumptions that need to be met for valid statistical inference. Two of these assumptions are the equality of population variances and the normal distribution of populations.

b. The assumption of homogeneity of variance states that the population variances for each combination of levels of the two factors in a two-way ANOVA should be equal. Violation of this assumption can lead to biased results and affect the validity of the statistical test.

c. The assumption of normality states that the populations from which the samples are taken should follow a normal distribution. This assumption is important because the validity of the F-test used in ANOVA is based on the assumption of normality. Departures from normality can impact the accuracy and reliability of the results.

a. The statement in option (a) is not true. The two-way ANOVA is not robust to violations of the assumptions of sampling from normal distributions and homogeneity of variance, even if the samples are of equal size. Violations of these assumptions can lead to inaccurate and unreliable results.

d. The statement in option (d) is also not true. If the assumptions of a two-way ANOVA are violated, it does not necessarily mean that the researcher should conduct two separate one-way ANOVAs. There are alternative non-parametric tests or robust ANOVA methods that can be used in such cases. The choice of appropriate statistical analysis depends on the nature of the data and the specific research question.

Learn more about ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/30763604

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

To understand geometry, it is easier to visualize the problem and then draw a diagram. If you're asked about some angles, draw them. Relationships like vertical angles are much easier to see in a diagram; if one isn't provided, draw it yourself.

Answer:

x = 16

y = 140

Step-by-step explanation:

Since angles on a straight line add to 180°,

(8x + 12) + (3x-8) = 180

8x + 3x + 12 - 8 = 180

11x + 4 = 180

11x = 176

x = 16

Due to the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem,

y = 8x + 12

Substituting 'x=16' into 'y=8x+12':

y = 8(16) + 12

= 128 + 12

= 140

Hope this helps and be sure to have a wonderful time ahead at Brainly! :D

The Hardy-Weinberg equation is a mathematical formula used to calculate the frequency of alleles (alternative forms of genes) in a population.

It states that the frequency of alleles and genotypes in a population will remain constant from generation to generation in the absence of other evolutionary influences.

The equation is expressed as: p² + 2pq + q² = 1

In this equation, p represents the frequency of the dominant allele in the population, and q represents the frequency of the recessive allele.

The superscripts 2 represent the proportion of individuals in the population that are homozygous for that allele (meaning they have two copies of the same allele), while the 2pq term represents the proportion of individuals that are heterozygous (meaning they have one copy of each allele).

The sum of these terms is always equal to 1, as it represents the entire population.

This equation assumes several conditions: that the population is large, randomly mating, with no mutations, migration, natural selection, or genetic drift.

In reality, these conditions are rarely met, and the Hardy-Weinberg equation serves as a useful model for understanding how allele frequencies can change over time due to various evolutionary influences.

For similar question on Hardy-Weinberg equation

https://brainly.com/question/29776155

#SPJ11

Answer:

To determine if Daniel should have filled out his W-4 form differently to receive a refund, we need to compare his tax liability with the total amount withheld from his paychecks for the year.

If Daniel's tax liability for the year is less than $3,900, he will receive a refund when he files his taxes. If his tax liability is more than $3,900, he will owe additional taxes when he files his taxes.

If Daniel's tax liability is exactly $3,900, he will neither owe additional taxes nor receive a refund when he files his taxes.

Therefore, to determine if Daniel should have filled out his W-4 form differently, we need to compare his tax liability with $3,900.

If Daniel's tax liability from part B, question 3, is less than $3,900, he will receive a refund when he files his taxes, as the total amount withheld from his paychecks is more than his tax liability. In this case, Daniel may want to consider filling out his W-4 form differently to reduce the amount withheld from his paychecks and increase his take-home pay.

On the other hand, if Daniel's tax liability from part B, question 3, is more than $3,900, he will owe additional taxes when he files his taxes, as the total amount withheld from his paychecks is less than his tax liability. In this case, Daniel may want to consider filling out his W-4 form differently to increase the amount withheld from his paychecks and reduce the amount he will owe when he files his taxes.

If Daniel's tax liability from part B, question 3, is exactly $3,900, he will neither owe additional taxes nor receive a refund when he files his taxes, and his W-4 form is correctly filled out for his tax situation.

In summary, whether or not Daniel should have filled out his W-4 form differently to receive a refund depends on his tax liability compared to the total amount withheld from his paychecks. If his tax liability is less than the total amount withheld, he may want to reduce the amount withheld to increase his take-home pay. If his tax liability is more than the total amount withheld, he may want to increase the amount withheld to reduce the amount he will owe when he files his taxes. If his tax liability is exactly equal to the total amount withheld, his W-4 form is correctly filled out for his tax situation.

Think of 20% as 20/100 = 0.20

Then we multiply, not divide, this value with 600

0.20*600 = 120 is the answer.

Answer: She divided it by 2 which is incorrect, instead she should multiply 20% by 600kg to get 20% of 600

\(\frac{20}{100}\) x 600 (the answer will be 120kg)

Answer:

n ≥ 12.5 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

Weekly savings = at least $16

n = number of weeks

At least in inequality means ≥

16n ≥ 200

n ≥ 200/16

n ≥ 12.5 weeks

12.5 weeks until she has saved $200

Answer:

3 and 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x=smallest number

2x=biggest number

x+2x=9

3x=9

x=3

3 x 2 =6

Hope this helps =]

The unconditional mean E(Y) of the autoregressive model AR(1) is 10.5.

To compute the unconditional mean E(Y) of the autoregressive model AR(1) given by 1.05 + 0.9Y + ε, we can use the property of linearity in expectation and solve for the mean value.

The model can be rewritten as:

Y = (1.05 + ε) / (1 - 0.9)

Since ε follows a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 0.01, we know that E(ε) = 0.

Using the linearity of expectation, we can compute the unconditional mean E(Y) as follows:

E(Y) = E((1.05 + ε) / (1 - 0.9))

= (1.05 + E(ε)) / (1 - 0.9)

= 1.05 / (1 - 0.9)

= 1.05 / 0.1

= 10.5

Learn more about Autoregressive model here, https://brainly.com/question/29933730

#SPJ11

Answer : 0.21%

Step - by - step explanation :

What is 24% of 87% ? 0.2088%

0.2088% -- round it --> 0.21%

The correct answer is A. The null hypothesis is rejected in error.

In statistical hypothesis testing, a Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly retained or failed to be rejected when it is actually false.

In other words, a Type II error happens when the researcher concludes that there is no significant difference or relationship between variables when, in reality, there is.

It is a false negative result, as the researcher fails to detect a true effect or relationship.

Option A accurately describes Type II error, while the other options are not related to Type II error.

Option B refers to rejecting the research hypothesis, which is not a Type II error but rather a Type I error.

Option C refers to the study being underpowered, which may increase the likelihood of both Type I and Type II errors but is not a direct description of Type II error.

Option D mentions double-blinding, which is a methodological consideration and not directly related to Type II error.

Option E refers to accepting the research hypothesis in error, which is not a Type II error but rather a correct decision or Type I error.

To know more about hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32562440#

#SPJ11

Answer:

It is C I am good at math

Step-by-step explanation:

The expansion of the function f = y'x + x'z with respect to x yields (x + y')(x + z'), and the expansion with respect to y gives (x' + y)(x + z').

(a) To expand the function f = y'x + x'z with respect to x, we use the distributive property and apply De Morgan's law to simplify the expression:

f = y'x + x'z

  = x'y + x'z

  = (x'y)'(x'z)'    [Using De Morgan's law]

  = (x + y')(x + z')   [Using De Morgan's law again]

(b) Designing the function using a 2-to-1 multiplexer for the case of expanding f with respect to x involves using the inputs x, y, and z as the select lines of the multiplexer. The inputs x + y' and x + z' will be connected to the data inputs of the multiplexer, and the output of the multiplexer will be the expanded function f.

(c) Similarly, for expanding f with respect to y, the expansion is:

f = y'x + x'z

  = xy' + x'z

  = (xy')'(x'z)'    [Using De Morgan's law]

  = (x' + y)(x + z')   [Using De Morgan's law again]

For this case, the inputs x', y, and z will serve as the select lines of the 2-to-1 multiplexer. The inputs x' + y and x + z' will be connected to the data inputs, and the output of the multiplexer will represent the expanded function f.

In both cases, the 2-to-1 multiplexer is used to implement the logic function by selecting the appropriate data inputs based on the select lines, which are derived from the expansion of the function with respect to the corresponding variable.

In conclusion, the expansion of the function f = y'x + x'z with respect to x yields (x + y')(x + z'), and the expansion with respect to y gives (x' + y)(x + z'). By utilizing 2-to-1 multiplexers, the expanded functions can be designed by connecting the appropriate data inputs to the multiplexer based on the select lines derived from the expansions. This allows for the implementation of the logic functions using multiplexers, providing a compact and efficient circuit design.

Learn more about expansion here:

brainly.com/question/33072567

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First things first, you need to find out how many minutes it took Corrine to run one mile each day. To do this, you divide 4 by 4 and 28 by 4

4 ÷ 4 = number of miles

4 ÷ 4 = 1 mile

28 ÷ 4 = number of minutes for one mile

28 ÷ 4 = 7 minutes for one mile

Next, you need to divide 5.5 by 5.5 and 32 by 5.5

5.5 ÷ 5.5 = number of miles

5.5 ÷ 5.5 = 1 mile

32 ÷ 5.5 = number of minutes for one mile

32 ÷ 5.5 = 5.81818181818

So, Corrine ran one mile in 7 minutes yesterday and ran one mile in 5.81818181818 today.

All in all, Corrine ran faster today than yesterday.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

see attached

hope it helps!

Answer:

STAN BTS

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Length= 7 Width=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

¿Podría explicar la pregunta con más detalle?

Step-by-step explanation:

Jimmy charges a flat fee of $22 and $25 per hour in addition to the flat fee.

We have to find an expression that represents the following:

Jimmy works at Bob's place for h hours.

Remember that Jimmy charges a flat fee of $22, and he will charge $25 for every hour, since he worked h hours, the expression is:

This represents the flat fee of 22 plus an additional 25h, which represents that he charges 25 per hour.

Answer: 22+25h

Answer:

3 and 12

Step-by-step explanation:

just multiply 2 x 3 and 2 x 12 and it would give you 6 and 24 :) I hope this help

A person has $785.35 after 7 years in the account.

Interest that is compounded continuously to the principal amount. This interest rate provides exponential growth for a period of time.

The formula of continuous compound interest rate;

\(V = Pe^{rt}\),

Where P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate and t is the time period.

A person places $398 in an investment account earning an annual rate of 9.7%, compounded continuously.

Using the formula:

\(V = Pe^{rt}\), where P = $398, r = 0.097 (9.7% as a decimal), and t = 7 years, we can calculate the value of the account after 7 years as:

V = 398\(e^(0.0977)\)

V = 398\(e^{0.679}\)

V = 784.818126761

V = $785.35 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Therefore, the amount of money in the account after 7 years is $785.35.

To learn more about continuous compound interest;

https://brainly.com/question/18722165

#SPJ2