The players in a college or professional football games regularly commit acts on each other that, in other contexts, the law would consider to be violent assault-and-battery. However hardly any players are ever charged with a crime involving violence on the field because _________.

No, crime prevention could not be answered only by one policing style, Model, approach, or strategy because there are varied crimes and all can not judge by one policing style, model, etc. Therefore in our constitutions varied laws, act and policies are mentioned.

What is crime prevention?

The first requirement of justice is prevention, 

"Crime prevention" refers to techniques and tactics aimed at lowering the likelihood that crimes will be committed, as well as their potentially damaging effects on people and society, including the fear of crime, by intervening to affect their various causes.

It takes a multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary, and integrated effort to prevent crime.

There is clear evidence that well-planned crime prevention measures not only prevent crime and victimization, but also increase community safety and contribute to sustainable development of countries, the introduction to the Guidelines for the Prevention of Crime states. All citizens' lives are improved by effective, ethical crime prevention.

To know more about crime preventing, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/18258200

#SPJ9

Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.

Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.

In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.

The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.

By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.

Learn more about validity, here

https://brainly.com/question/13012369

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.

The main concept in intersectionality theory which is involved with interpersonal encounters where the collision (of identity) might take place is interstitiality. (Option A).

Social class  has consistently explained more variance than any other variable in criminology (Option D).

In masculinity theory and elsewhere, the toxic quest for power, male domination, and unearned privilege all have hegemony in common. (Option B).

One can appreciative and narrative criminology see that narratives motivate criminal behavior by the rhyme and reason of stories. (Option A).

Neo-conservative criminology is to neo-functional criminology as new right-wing ideology is to new left-wing ideology. (Option A).

Intersectionality theory is a foundation for understanding how many friendly identities in the way that race, grammatical rules applying to nouns that connote sex or animateness, sexuality, class, and talent project and communicate with one another to design singular occurrences of hardship and privilege. Intersectionality belief, grown by jurisprudent Kimberlé Crenshaw in the 1980s, recognizes that women have many friendly identities that cannot be evaluated alone of each one.

A Black mother, for example, grant permission face different forms of bias than a white she or a Black father, cause her occurrences are impacted by two together her race and feminine. The meaning of understanding and addressing the habits at which point various types of oppression converge and compound to conceive singular experiences of bias and marginalization is stressed by intersectionality hypothesis

Learn more about  intersectionality theory here: https://brainly.com/question/30759024

#SPJ1

Answer: Daily Earnings Of An American On Average

The workday for an average American is 8 hours. Based on this and the mean income (as on May, 2016) of nearly $23.86, an American makes $190.88 every day. While the weekly median salary in the third quarter of 2017 was calculated as $857, it varied considerably between genders.

Explanation:

I hope this helps

Answer:

To steer the car in reverse, turn the wheel in the direction you want the rear of the car to go. Turning the wheel to the right steers the back of the car to the right. Turning the wheel to the left steers to the left.

Explanation:

The first security control that needs to be examined in relation to X.509 requirements is the implementation of a valid and trusted certificate authority (CA) infrastructure.

X.509 is a widely adopted standard for public key infrastructure (PKI), which includes digital certificates used for secure communication. To conform to X.509 requirements, the organization must ensure that a robust CA infrastructure is in place. This involves evaluating the CA's policies, procedures, and practices for issuing, managing, and revoking digital certificates.

Additionally, it is essential to review the CA's compliance with industry best practices, such as key management, certificate validation, and secure storage of private keys. By examining the CA infrastructure, the organization can address the cited non-conformance and improve its adherence to X.509 requirements.

Learn more about Organization

https://brainly.com/question/12825206

#SPJ11

Answer:

The U.S. never signed the UN treaty, making it unclear as to whether it can be enforced or not.

Explanation:

bro trust

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.

When a legal case involves a question of state law, the state's highest court, often called the supreme court, is the highest level to which it can be taken.

This court is the ultimate judicial authority in the state and has the final say on all legal matters that fall under its jurisdiction.

As the highest court in the state, the supreme court has the power to review lower court decisions and determine whether they conform to state law.

The court's rulings on these matters are considered binding and final, and they establish legal precedents that lower courts must follow in the future.

The supreme court's decisions have far-reaching implications for the state, as they impact the interpretation and application of state law.

Therefore, the decisions made by the state's highest court have significant legal and practical consequences for citizens, businesses, and government entities within the state.

The highest level to which a case involving a question of state law can be carried would be the state's highest court, typically known as the supreme court.

Read more about  court

https://brainly.com/question/8433911

#SPJ11

Answer:

D. motion to dismiss

Explanation:

Answer:

According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.

It is most definitely a job. A demanding job. Every day, the 800,000 police officers, deputies, troopers, and agents in the United States are tasked with keeping our communities safe, assisting those in need, and responding to events that the normal person would avoid. Physical force and constraint are only used as a last resort by law enforcement officers when it comes to executing the law. The most effective law enforcement officers are those who can handle conflicts and enforce laws without resorting to physical violence. Traditional public safety actions that are conducted over a certain length of time are included in law enforcement service: patrol services; investigative services; prisoner housing; computerized or manual fingerprint identification; dispatching; law enforcement file record keeping; and property management

Answer:

first give the picture.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) establishes and oversees the content of the EMT and paramedic courses. Hence, the suitable option for this question will be option (a).

The Department of Transportation in the United States is home to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Its stated objective in relation to American transportation safety is to "Save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce vehicle-related crashes." As part of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) system, NHTSA is tasked with creating and implementing Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards as well as rules for motor vehicle theft resistance and fuel efficiency. On March 1st, 1967, FMVSS 209 became the first standard to go into effect.

The NHTSA also issues licenses to automakers and importers, permits or prohibits the importation of cars and car parts subject to safety regulations, manages the vehicle identification number (VIN) system, creates the anthropomorphic test subjects used in U.S. safety tests as well as the test procedures themselves, and provides information on auto insurance rates. The organization claims to have preemptive regulatory jurisdiction over greenhouse gas emissions, although state regulatory bodies like the California Air Resources Board have questioned this.

To know more about, NHTSA, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11342968

#SPJ1

Answer:Yes and no

Explanation:

I said yes because some of the things people do they should get punished for because they should be doin it or they could hurt someone like a DUI they know that they are not suppose to drunk and drive but they still do.I also said no because if they just have a tail light out or a headlight they should be punished so badly.

Five problems caused by ineffective listening skills:

If one does not listen properly, significant data may lead to perplexity and misconstruction. This may consequently result in weakened reliance between individuals.

Insufficient listening ability could cause one to miss out on valuable prospects of acquiring new proficiencies, obtaining useful interpretations or criticisms, fostering novel concepts. The incapacity to fully comprehend what is being conveyed can cause the loss of essential instructions causing disarray, mistakes, and postponements during work procedures.

Find out more on ineffective listening at https://brainly.com/question/30393296

#SPJ1

The legal action that Delroy and hundreds of other people joined together for is called a class action lawsuit. The last option is correct. This type of lawsuit allows a group of people to join together to bring a single lawsuit against a defendant.

Learn more about legal action: https://brainly.com/question/29423179

#SPJ11

The correct answer is common law. The common law is the body of legislation that has been developed by judges and other quasi-judicial bodies and is distinguished by being expressed in written opinions.

Common law is distinguished by the fact that it develops through precedent. Common law courts use previous court rulings to summarise the legal tenets of earlier instances. Common law is based on institutionalised judgements and interpretations made by jurors and judicial officials. There are occasions when common laws serve as the model for new legislation. The validity of the administrative action is ensured by judicial review, which also helps to keep the administrative authority within reasonable limits. The Court questions whether the administrative authority followed the law when acting. However, the courts are unable to and do not replace the administrative authority's judgement with their own. There are five different sorts of legal systems: mixed law, common law, customary law, and religious law.

Learn more about Common law here:

https://brainly.com/question/8476406

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people.

EXPLANATION:

Ehrlichman told journalist Dan Baum in 1994. "You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities."

The accusation was shocking, characterizing the war on drugs as a racist, politically motivated crusade.

But Ehrlichman's claim is likely an oversimplification, according to historians who have studied the period and Nixon's drug policies in particular. There's no doubt Nixon was racist, and historians told me that race could have (played one role in Nixon's drug war. But there are also signs that Nixon wasn't solely motivated by politics or race: For one, he personally despised drugs — to the point that it's not surprising he would want to rid the world of them. And there's evidence that Ehrlichman felt bitter and betrayed by Nixon after he spent time in prison over the Watergate scandal, so he may have lied.

More importantly, Nixon's drug policies did not focus on the kind of criminalization that Ehrlichman described. Instead, Nixon's drug war was largely a public health crusade — one that would be reshaped into the modern, punitive drug war we know today by later administrations, particularly President Ronald Reagan.

None of that means that the drug war hasn't disproportionately hurt black Americans. It clearly has. But the lessons of Nixon's drug policies may not be so much that he was a racist, power-hungry politician — although, again, he was — but rather that even well-meaning policies can have big, terrible unintended consequences.

Hope it helps! And please give me brainliest pleasse?

Explanation:

The law enforcement coordinating committee

hope it helps please mark as brainliest

Answer:

You are the legal advisor of a big advertising company, Clooney Ideas. They have a lot of clients and every month you get various Television Commercials (TVCs) ideas from the art director and concept writers to analyze and give legal clearance. This month the following concepts / idea were presented to you:

Idea # 1 (Japan Chai)

The TVC will show a skinny (thin) person fighting a wrestling match (kushti) at a village in interior Punjab. He is foiled miserably by his opponent (a big pahalwan). The skinny person is then approached by his friend who says “Japan cha sumo wrestler ki pehchan!” The skinny person has the tea and then immediately becomes a big fat sumo wrestler (like Yokozuna). In the next round he thrashes his opponent and wins. He is hailed by everyone in the village. In the last scene the skinny person says “Tussi bhi piyo! Sumo wrestler na banay to Rs. 1000 inam!”

Idea # 2 (Awami insect killer)

A person (famous cricketer Zameer Akram) is shown being bitten by mosquitos. He goes to a doctor and tells him that for some reason mosquitos love him. The doctor (who is the famous hero Fahad Khan wearing a lab coat) says, “Hum nay Awami insect spray, dus (10) patients per kiya, or 100% positive result raha!” In the next scene Zameer Akram is shown playing a night cricket match and all mosquitoes near him are falling dead immediately, a batsman who is about to face him also runs for his life like a mosquito. In the end Zameer Akram is shown holding Awami insect killer and saying “Awami mein hai Awam ki power!”

You are separately told by the makers of Awami insect killer that the 100% success rate is based on lab conditions i.e. the patients were exposed to rare breed of mosquitos found in Africa only. The spray will have very little effect on mosquitos found in Pakistan.

Idea # 3 (Dosti chewing gum)

A group of 6 friends will be shown in the first scene who are sitting idle and getting bored in a university. All of a sudden one of the friends pops out a box of dosti chewing gum and gives it to all of them. After eating the chewing gum, all of them get energized, start to run around, three friends are shown flying in the sky with wings. One of them is riding a flying horse. Two of the friends are shown getting on a rocket and flying to space. In the last scene all friends shout collectively “Dosti chewing gum is so friendly!”

Idea 4 (Afridi whitening cream)

In the first scene, three African Americans are shown trying to give trials for the Chinese basketball team. However, due to their skin tone they are rejected despite having exceptional skills. They go home depressed.

In the next scene their Pakistani friend comes to their place and says “You can be as fair as me, apply Afridi whitening cream for 30 days, if you don’t become fair, you three can win a ticket to Hawaii”

The three basket players are then shown using the Afridi whitening cream and growing fairer each day. Eventually all three of them turn into famous, Pakistani actors. They appear for basketball trials again and are selected for the Chinese team.

At the end of the TVC a voice over says, “Afridi whitening cream, world’s number 1 whitening cream”

Q-1 Discuss the legal implication for each of the above ideas. In particular, which ideas (from a legal perspective) are the best and the worst?

Q-2 Please elaborate how will you change the ideas to cover the legal risks involved.

True, Alerts will include advice on how to stop, lessen, or deal with the threat. The United States and its possessions are covered by the NTAS. Consult State Department's travel advice before departing for a foreign country.

About National Terrorism Advisory System

Since April 26, 2011, the US Department of Homeland Security has used a terrorism threat advisory scale called the National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS).

The George W. Bush administration's color-coded, much criticised Homeland Security Advisory System was replaced with the NTAS in 2002. The NTAS will issue alerts related to the threat with a fixed end date, according to Janet Napolitano, who claimed that color-coded system frequently provided the public with little useful information.

Secretary Jeh Johnson first turned on the bulletin feature on December 16, 2015. After identifying a "new phase" in the worldwide terrorism threat against the nation, the Department of Homeland Security created an intermediate threat level in 2015.

To know more about National Terrorism Advisory System:

brainly.com/question/26022473

#SPJ4

To hedge your position by buying put options with three-month expirations and a $30 strike price, you will need to buy 34 put option contracts.

The Black-Scholes-Merton formula can be used to calculate the value of an option. The formula is as follows:

where:

In this case, the current stock price is $27.07, the strike price is $30, the risk-free interest rate is 0.055, and the time to expiration is 3 months. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton formula, we can calculate the value of the call option as follows:

C = $27.07 * N(d1) - $30 * e⁻⁰.⁰⁵⁵ ˣ ⁰.²⁵ * N(d2)

= $27.07 * 0.6321 - $30 * e⁻⁰.⁰⁵⁵ ˣ ⁰.²⁵ * 0.3679

= $17.05

Therefore, the value of the call option is $17.05.

To hedge your position, you need to buy put options with a strike price that is equal to or greater than the strike price of the call option. In this case, you will need to buy put options with a strike price of $30.

The number of put option contracts that you need to buy depends on the value of the call option. In this case, the value of the call option is $17.05. The price of a put option is typically equal to the difference between the strike price and the current stock price. In this case, the price of a put option is $30 - $27.07 = $2.93.

Therefore, you will need to buy 17.05 / 2.93 = 5.84 put option contracts. Since you cannot buy fractions of a contract, you will need to buy 6 put option contracts.

Learn more about strike price

https://brainly.com/question/15571230

#SPJ4

Explanation/answer:

9th:

gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power

10th:

Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.

Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.

The statement is True, according to the results of the study conducted by Barlow et al., all neutralization techniques have the same impact on the likelihood of rule violation.

A violation refers to an act or behavior that goes against established rules, laws, or norms. It is an instance where someone fails to adhere to the expected standards or conditions set by a particular system or authority. Violations can occur in various domains, such as legal, ethical, social, or organizational contexts.

In legal terms, a violation often refers to the breach of a specific law or regulation. It can range from minor infractions like traffic violations to more serious offenses such as theft or assault. Violations of ethical standards involve actions that contravene moral principles or codes of conduct, such as dishonesty or plagiarism. Social violations can include actions that disrupt social norms or conventions, like inappropriate behavior in public or rudeness towards others.

To know more about Violation refer to-

brainly.com/question/31558707

#SPJ4

Due to the limited word limits for his marketing, he concludes the email with the name of his brokerage but omits their method of contact.

Broker is a term used to describe a person or company that acts as a middleman between a buyer and a seller, or between an investor and a securities exchange, and who purchases and sells goods or assets on behalf of other people. Brokers are businesses that act as customers' agents and get payment from customers in the form of commissions.

You may be referring to the entire following even though your query is incomplete: A broker established a website with the brokerage's name, address, and phone number.

Learn more about advertisement.

https://brainly.com/question/3163475

#SPJ4

The most effective way for lobbyists to access policy makers is by building relationships. Lobbyists need to build relationships with policy makers in order to ensure that they understand their message and are able to effectively make their case.

Lobbyists are individuals or groups that seek to influence government decisions and legislation on behalf of a certain cause. They are often employed by corporations, trade associations, labor unions, or other organizations to advocate on behalf of their interests.

These relationships are built over time and often require multiple interactions in order to foster trust and understanding. Additionally, lobbyists must be knowledgeable about the topics they are discussing and must be able to effectively communicate their ideas to the policy makers in order to be successful.

To learn more about lobbyists
https://brainly.com/question/29550381
#SPJ4

The adequacy of the evaluation of the similar multiple for Kraft to obtain the very last offer of 840p consistent with a share plus a 10p unique dividend, in light of the Kraft/Cadbury case and valuation information, is that an in-depth analysis of the challenges faced by Kraft in attaining desired synergies is required.

In the Kraft/Cadbury case, the evaluation of the similar multiple by myself might not have been enough to justify Kraft's very last provide of 840p consistent with percentage plus a 10p unique dividend. While comparable multiples analysis is a not unusual valuation approach, it has obstacles when comparing specific situations concerning strategic acquisitions and synergies.

One of the essential demanding situations confronted by Kraft in attaining the desired synergies was cultural integration. Kraft and Cadbury had one-of-a-kind corporate cultures, which can prevent the hit integration of operations and groups.

Bridging this cultural gap and fostering collaboration between the two corporations would have been crucial for figuring out synergistic advantages.

Another venture changed into the capacity difficulty in taking pictures of price financial savings and operational efficiencies. Kraft aimed to acquire large synergies by means of streamlining delivery chains, consolidating production centers, and reducing overhead fees.

However, figuring out those synergies regularly calls for careful planning, execution, and overcoming operational complexities, including variations in manufacturing techniques and distribution networks.

Furthermore, market dynamics and opposition posed demanding situations for Kraft. The confectionery enterprise is fantastically aggressive, and maintaining the market proportion and profitability even as integrating a prime acquisition can be traumatic.

Kraft needed to navigate capability disruptions and hold consumer loyalty amidst the purchase system, which could impact the projected monetary benefits.

In conclusion, whilst the comparable multiples analysis provides a valuation framework, the Kraft/Cadbury case highlights that additional concerns beyond financial metrics had been essential. Cultural integration, capturing synergistic value savings, and handling market dynamics have been massive challenges faced by means of Kraft in achieving the favored synergies.

A comprehensive evaluation incorporating these elements could be important to evaluate the adequacy of the very last provide.

To know more about Cadbury,

https://brainly.com/question/32786366

#SPJ4

The correct question is:

"Based on the Kraft / Cadbury case, as an analyst of Kraft and your knowledge of valuation, discuss whether the comparable of multiples analysis was adequate for Kraft to achieve the final offer of 840p per share plus 10p special dividend. In your answer, include a discussion of the major challenges faced by Kraft to achieve the desired synergies."