The "actus reus" and "mens rea" of a crime is said to exist if all the elements of a crime are "present" at one time.
Actus reus refers to the physical action or conduct that constitutes a crime, while mens rea represents the mental state or intention behind committing the crime. In order for a crime to be established, both elements must be present simultaneously.
Actus reus can include actions like theft, assault, or murder, while mens rea involves the intent to commit the crime or the knowledge of the criminal consequences. For instance, in the case of theft, the actus reus would be the taking of another person's property, and the mens rea would be the intent to deprive the owner of their property permanently.
Both actus reus and mens rea are essential in determining criminal liability, as they help to differentiate between accidental and intentional actions. In some cases, the absence of either element can lead to a defense for the accused, such as insanity or self-defense. If a person commits a harmful act without the necessary men's rea, they may not be held criminally liable.
In conclusion, the actus reus and mens rea of a crime must be present at the same time for a crime to exist. These elements help establish the necessary criteria for determining criminal responsibility and provide a framework for evaluating the intent and actions of an individual in a criminal case.
Know more about Actus reus here:
https://brainly.com/question/3065381?source=archive
#SPJ11
Status offenses are violations of the law:
Answer:
if this is a true or false i would say false
Explanation:
i also need more info to help you
hotspot - for each of the following statements, select yes if the statement is true. otherwise, select no. note: each correct selection is worth one point. hot area:
The correct response to the above questions is given as follows;
One must be aware that Platform as a Service (PaaS) is a cloud computing model that provides a platform for users to develop, run, and manage applications without the need to worry about the underlying infrastructure.
PaaS providers typically offer a development environment, tools, and infrastructure resources such as servers, storage, and networking, which can be accessed over the internet. Users can build, test, and deploy applications on the PaaS platform, and the provider takes care of the maintenance, security, and scaling of the underlying infrastructure.
Learn more about PaaS:
https://brainly.com/question/20600180
#SPJ1
Full Question:
HOTSPOT
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides full control of the operating systems that host applications.
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides the ability to scale the platform automatically
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides professional development services to continuously add features to custom applications.
what kind of effects are there at individual and country level when there is no respect of rights of equality of religions
Explanation:
there is no peace and security
What is a warranty?
(A) It is a stipulation about the contract.
(B) It is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract
(C) It is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
(D) It is a statement of commendation by the seller.
Answer:
C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft,
coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of
choice?
A. Capital
B. Profits
C. Resources
D. Wages
Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon
Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?
Let's consider all the choices:
Capital: is a financial asset usually given to help start a company or invest in a company. This doesn't protect against theft, fraud, or coercion as its purpose is to help start not to protect a companyProfits: it is the money made by the company. However, that doesn't protect a company as it only makes a company more vulnerable to theft as dishonest people will find the company more attractive to take advantage of.Resources: by having resources, the companies have ways to evade criminals as they have ways and connections to use their profit and capital and their workers to move past the dangerWages: is the payment made to the workers for their service. This doesn't protect the company as its purpose is to only pay their workers for their service, not to protect the company.Answer: Resources
Hope that helps!
#LearnwithBrainly
one-party dominance in house districts tends to produce winning candidates who are
One-party dominance in House districts tends to produce winning candidates who are members of the dominant party in that district.
This is because in such districts, the majority of voters tend to support the dominant party, making it difficult for candidates from other parties to win.
In such districts, the primary election for the dominant party is often the most competitive election, as winning the primary is usually tantamount to winning the general election. Therefore, candidates who want to win in these districts often need to win the support of the dominant party's primary voters.
As a result, winning candidates in one-party dominant House districts tend to be more ideologically extreme, as they need to appeal to the party's base voters who tend to be more ideologically consistent. These candidates also tend to focus more on pleasing their party's base than appealing to moderate or swing voters.
It's worth noting that the effect of one-party dominance in House districts can vary depending on factors such as the demographics of the district, the popularity of individual candidates, and national political trends. Nonetheless, in general, one-party dominance tends to produce winning candidates who are members of the dominant party and who appeal to that party's base voters.
To know more about One-party dominance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30557005
#SPJ4
The Hospital Corporation of America, founded by the family of Bill Frist (Republican, Tenn.), former U. S. Senate Majority Leader, and the country's largest for profit hospital chain, settled fraud charges with the U. S. Justice Department. Read the article at: https://www.laweekly.com/the-bad-doctor/ (Links to an external site.)
Does the LA Weekly article appear to be biased, or does it seem to accurately report HCA's fraud? Explain your answer.
The LA Weekly article does not appear to be biased. From the content of the article, it appears to accurately report on HCA's fraud.
The article outlines specific cases in which HCA and its affiliates were accused of fraud, such as overbilling Medicaid and Medicare, billing for unnecessary services, and operating physician practices to overbill government health care programs.
The article also states that HCA agreed to pay a total of $2.5 billion in criminal and civil fines to resolve the fraud charges. The article even provides a quote from the Department of Justice responding to the settlement. These facts all support a conclusion that the LA Weekly article is accurately reporting HCA's fraud.
To know more about HCA , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18369452
#SPJ4
The unlawful taking or attempted taking of property that is in the
immediate possession of another, by force or the threat of force, is
known as
olarceny-theft.
O robbery.
O burglary.
O aggravated assault
sk
1. People are the source of government power.
(1 Point)
Federalism
Checks and Balances
Separation of Powers
Rule of Law
Popular Sovereignty
a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation.
T/F
True, a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation. This is because witnesses have testimonial immunity, which protects them from defamation lawsuits while providing testimony.
This statement is generally true. Witnesses who testify in court or before a legislature are generally protected by a privilege from being sued for defamation for statements they make while testifying. This privilege is based on the idea that it is important to encourage witnesses to speak candidly and freely without fear of being sued for their statements. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as if the witness acted with malice or made statements outside the scope of their testimony.
Learn more about defamation: https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
whats 1 1/4 miles in 1/2 hours?
Answer:
Speed = 2.5 miles / hours
Explanation:
Given:
Distance travel = \(1\frac{1}{4}\) miles = 1.25 miles
Time taken = 1/2 hours = 0.5 hours
Find:
Speed
Computation:
Speed = Distance / time
Speed = 1.25 / 0.5
Speed = 2.5 miles / hours
3. Supreme Court Justices Are Umpires
It has become fashionable for Supreme Court nominees and sometimes the Justices themselves to deflect controversy and play down their own importance by suggesting judicial decision-making involves nothing more than the simple application of clear, undisputed rules. Perhaps with Obama's selection … we won't be subjected to the baseball metaphor that Chief Justice John Roberts has used, but however the idea is couched, it's pure bunk. There is no rulebook for constitutional interpretation. In trying to give meaning to inherently elastic constitutional concepts like "equal protection of the laws" and due process, and in interpreting federal statutes that are often less than precise, Supreme Court Justices inevitably make subjective value judgments that are colored by their individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise.
In voting against confirming John Roberts, then Senator Obama explained that he was opposing the conservative Roberts because of how he would decide the slim "5%" of cases in which the law really is ambiguous and a Justice's values will inevitably shape his or her views. Our law-professor President got the concept right but the percentage wrong. Cases rarely reach the Supreme Court level when the right answer is clear. Most of the time, the Supreme Court hears cases only after lower federal courts have reached conflicting answers on vexing legal questions.
In short, there is a reason that Justice Harry Blackmun, a man whose grandfathers had fought for the Union in the Civil War and who idolized Abraham Lincoln, opposed the states' rights movement and was a passionate liberal voice on issues of race. There is a reason that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a pioneer of the fight for women's legal equality, takes an expansive view of the equal-protection clause. There is a reason that Roberts, who came of age as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution, has a voting record that matches the old Reagan agenda. And there is a reason that Clarence Thomas, who grew up resenting the racial preferences that took him up the educational ladder to Yale Law School, reads the Constitution as imposing absolute colorblindness on government actors.
Conscientious judges understand that the law is much more than a reflection of their own personal preferences. But in the hard cases, the political cases, the cases tinged with moral judgment, where constitutional language and history provide no single irrefutable answer, a judge's formative experience matters — family, geography, mentors and heroes — they cleave liberal from conservative and ineluctably insinuate themselves into the law.
1. According to the article, what IS the myth? You may/should use the heading as a guide, but also EXPLAIN it.
2. According to the article, why is it a “myth” – in other words, what is the reality?
3. Explain how the author makes the point with one of the examples he uses.
Answer:
The myth, according to the article, is the idea that Supreme Court Justices are like umpires who simply apply clear, undisputed rules when making decisions.
The reality, according to the article, is that judicial decision-making involves subjective value judgments that are colored by individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. The interpretation of constitutional concepts and federal statutes is inherently elastic and often less than precise, meaning that Justices cannot simply rely on a rulebook.
The author uses the example of Justice Harry Blackmun to make the point that a Justice's formative experiences can shape their views on legal issues. Blackmun's opposition to the states' rights movement and his passion for liberal views on issues of race were influenced by his personal history, including his grandfathers' service in the Civil War and his admiration for Abraham Lincoln. This shows that a Justice's personal background and values can play a role in their legal decisions, despite the myth that Justices are impartial umpires.
Answer:
Explanation:
The myth referred to in the article is the idea that judicial decision-making involves nothing more than the simple application of clear, undisputed rules.
The reality, according to the article, is that judicial decision-making involves subjective value judgments that are colored by the individual views of the judges about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. In trying to interpret inherently elastic constitutional concepts and federal statutes that are often less than precise, judges inevitably make subjective value judgments.
The author uses the example of Justice Harry Blackmun, who opposed the states' rights movement and was a passionate liberal voice on issues of race, to illustrate how a judge's formative experiences shape their views and decisions. The author suggests that Blackmun's family background, geographic location, and heroes and mentors all contributed to his liberal views on race and states' rights. Similarly, the author suggests that the experiences and background of other judges, such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Clarence Thomas, have influenced their views on equal protection and colorblindness, respectively. These examples demonstrate how a judge's personal experiences and values can shape their interpretation of the law, even in cases where the law is ambiguous or unclear.
TRUE / FALSE.
reasonable people can expect to disagree about optimal solutions to ethical dilemmas.
TRUE. Reasonable people can indeed expect to disagree about optimal solutions to ethical dilemmas.
Ethical dilemmas often involve complex and multifaceted considerations, such as conflicting values, moral principles, cultural beliefs, and personal experiences. Different individuals may prioritize these factors differently and arrive at varying conclusions regarding what constitutes the most ethical course of action.
Additionally, ethical dilemmas may lack clear-cut solutions, leaving room for interpretation and differing perspectives. As a result, it is reasonable to expect that people with different backgrounds, perspectives, and ethical frameworks may hold divergent opinions on the optimal resolution of ethical dilemmas.
Learn more about ethical dilemmas here:
https://brainly.com/question/28221102
#SPJ11
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
True/false: only the federal government may restrict emissions from motor vehicles.
The given statement "only the federal government may restrict emissions from motor vehicles." is false as both the federal government and state governments have the authority to restrict emissions from motor vehicles.
Under the Clean Air Act, the federal government establishes national emission standards for motor vehicles through organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency . The entire nation must adhere to these standards. To the extent that they are at least as strict as the federal standards, individual states may also decide to set their own requirements for vehicle emissions.
As a result, states are now able to enact stricter emission regulations to address regional air quality issues or advance environmental objectives. Several states have enacted these regulations, also known as the "California emission standards" and additional states have the option to do the same if they so choose.
Learn more about federal government at:
brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
this amendment guarantees certain rights for all people of every race and culture.
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal rights for all individuals, regardless of race or culture.
Does the Fourteenth Amendment protect the rights of people from different races and cultures?The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial amendment that ensures equal protection and due process of law for all individuals, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or cultural background. Ratified in 1868, this amendment aimed to address the rights of newly freed slaves after the Civil War, but its principles extend to protect the rights of all people.
The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from denying equal protection under the law, ensuring that every person within the jurisdiction of the United States is entitled to the same rights, privileges, and opportunities. It has been instrumental in shaping civil rights and equality in the United States, serving as a cornerstone for legal battles against discrimination and the promotion of inclusivity.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment
brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ11
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
Gyekye draws similarities between communitarianism and African socialism which several African leaders adopted in the early days of political independence. Whose conception of African socialism does Gyekye subscribe to? a. None of the options are correct. b. Mogobe Ramose, Thabo Mbeki, and Robert Mugabe. c. Kwame Nkrumah, Leopold Senghor, and Julius Nyerere. O d. Nelson Mandela, Leopold Senghor, and Cedric Robinson.
Legal insanity is a state of contractual _____, as determined by law.
A.incapacity
B.mistake
C.nullification
D.confusion
E.misunderstanding
Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.
The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.
Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.
It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.
To know more about legal insanity
https://brainly.com/question/31445937
#SPJ11
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
Anthony (29) and Vanessa (31) have lived together for the last couple of years. They are not married and do not present themselves as married. Vanessa's daughter, Sasha (9), lived with them all year. Sasha is not Anthony's daughter.
answer is Vanessa because of her relationship and time Sasha stays with her.
Sasha as a dependent of the Vanessa, She as the stayed with nine years. Sasha as a whole responsibility to Vanessa.
What is married?
The term married refer to the boy and girl are agreed to the relationship as the stay with each as the lifetime. The married to the couple are the agreed with the all the terms and the conditions to the loved with each other.
The Sasha as the daughter of the Vanessa. Vanessa responsibility to tack care her daughter. The Anthony (29) and Vanessa (31) are the relation to each other not the married, Sasha, are also staying with her.
As a result, the Sasha stays with her Vanessa to the whole responsibility.
Learn more about on married, here:
https://brainly.com/question/964414
#SPJ1
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
The model of criminal justice that is focused on protecting defendants’ rights is known as the ______ model.
Answer:
the due process model
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:process
Explanation:
augustus caesar created the __________, whose primary mission was to protect him from assassinatio
Augustus Caesar created the Praetorian Guard, whose primary mission was to protect him from assassination.
This elite unit of soldiers was formed in 27 BC and consisted of around 9,000 men, who were hand-picked for their loyalty and skill in combat. They were stationed in Rome, in a permanent camp outside the city walls, and were responsible for guarding the emperor and his family, as well as ensuring the security of the imperial palace and other important locations. The Praetorian Guard played a significant role in Roman politics, often manipulating or even deposing emperors to serve their own interests. Despite this, they remained a powerful and feared force throughout the Roman Empire until their dissolution in AD 312.
To know more about Augustus Caesar click here:
brainly.com/question/8668262
#SPJ11
号 Which of the following can be inserted on the Insert tab? Borders Excel spreadsheets Captions Headers and footers
Answer:
Headers and footers
Explanation:
The insert tab can the found on the ribbon of word processing programs, excel spreadsheets as they contain commands which allows the insertion of objects such as illustrations, tables, charts hyperlink, pictures, text boxes, Footers and headers. In a word processing program too, the insert tab also contains these elements. Therefore. From the question given, the feature from the given options which can be inserted from the insert tab is the Footer and Header. Which allows allows users to add information at the top and bottom areas of a page.
When the house of representatives passed the tallmadge amendment in response to missouri’s request for admission to the union, the south thought that the amendment.
Would threaten the sectional balance the house of representatives passed the Tallmadge amendment in response to Missouri's request for admission to the union, the south thought that the amendment.
Those are some things that Missouri is known for, a number of the maximum famous being its barbeque, robust agriculture industry, and iconic landmarks like the Gateway Arch. The state is likewise domestic to many beautiful state parks, which are perfect for trekking, tenting, and picnicking.
Regularly defined as a "Border state," the general public of Missouri unearths itself within the Midwest, yet it is anchored to the South by using the Southeast part of the nation referred to as "the Boot-heel," an area where Missouri is tied to the South both bodily and culturally.
Snow has been recognized to fall in Missouri as early as October, and as past due as may. however, the maximum of it falls in December, January, and February. As one might count, the northern counties commonly get the most snow. North of the Missouri River, the wintry weather snowfall averages 18 to 24 inches.
Learn more about Missouri here:
https://brainly.com/question/27314624
#SPJ4
how to draft simple summons in civil procedure
Answer:
Explanation:
What is a summon/Where to find it?
Complete the form. The summons document in most courts has a preferred format. Contact the clerk's office if a form or example is not accessible on the court's website. The summons should be "issued." A summons isn't legitimate unless it's signed by the clerk of the court where you filed your complaint.
What do you need in your summon?
Identify who is being sued. You'll need the person, business, or other entity you've designated as a defendant in the lawsuit's entire legal name and address. Each person or entity you are suing must get a separate summons.
local service delivery system in the Philippines - report
The local service delivery system in the Philippines refers to the provision of basic services such as healthcare, education, water, and sanitation to citizens by the local government units (LGUs).
The LGUs are responsible for implementing national policies and programs at the local level, ensuring that services are delivered efficiently and effectively. The system is designed to promote greater citizen participation in decision-making and to enhance the accountability of local officials. Despite some challenges such as inadequate funding, weak institutional capacity, and limited technical expertise, the local service delivery system in the Philippines has made significant progress in recent years. The government has taken steps to strengthen LGUs, including devolving more functions and resources to them, providing technical assistance and training, and improving monitoring and evaluation systems.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/1510449
#SPJ1
If you have been convicted of murder in a federal district court, and you appeal your conviction to a regional Court of Appeals, you will certainly get your case overturned by the federal appellate court based on the fact that you presented new evidence before a jury in an appellate court, new evidence not heard in you trial that absolutely proves you are innocent.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A LAN B RANDIS ARRIVED AT THE G OLDEN F OX RESTAURANT for a Friday-night fish fry. During his meal, a severe thunderstorm began, which caused the ceiling of the men’s restroom to leak. After finishing his meal, Alan entered the men’s room to wash his hands. He slipped on some wet tile, which was caused by the leak in the roof. Alan struck his head during the fall and was severely injured. One week later, Alan’s attorney contacted the owners of the Golden Fox with a claim for damages. The restaurant owners maintained the fall was not their responsibility, claiming they were not the insurers of guest safety. While the owners knew of the condition of the roof, they said it leaked only during extremely heavy thunderstorms and was too old to fix without undue economic hardship. Most important, because the storm was not within their
control, the owners maintained that it was not reasonable to assume they could have foreseen the severity of the storm, and thus they could not be held liable for the accident.
1. Was the severity of the storm a foreseeable event?
Yes the severity of the storm can be said to be a foreseeable event.
What is a foreseeable event?This is the term that is used in law to show that a person would have had to be able to anticipate the occurrence of something. That is, something is bound or likely to happen given certain things. This is one of the questions that can be found in the contract law as well as in the tort law.
This is a foreseeable event based on the fact that it was expected that such an event was going to have to happen. That is, the building already had issues. This was bound to occur. The business owed the customers the duty of care of having to put the place in order to avoid issues that may spring up such as the one that we have here.
Therefore in order to determine if the storm was a foreseeable event, we would say yes. The natural elements cannot really be controlled hence one has to make the measures that would take care of such situations.
Read more on foreseeable events here: https://brainly.com/question/17462805
#SPJ1