The infringement of constitutional rights is evident in the scenario below. Read the scenario and indicate which rights are infringed here. Motivate your answer in only one sentence by stating the specific right and how it was infringed. Include references to relevant sections in the constitution.
zanele (9 years) is diabetic. while on trip to the zoo she suffered a "hyp" (low blood sugar). Afterwards, the school was concerned that this might happen again and considered that they could not rely on zanele to control her blood sugar levels adequately without seeking any expert medical advice, the school told zanele she could not participate in a water sports day they organised at the school.
Answers
In the scenario described above, Zanele was denied participation in the water sports day without seeking medical opinion, so this is Section Nine of the Constitution of South Africa.
What is Section 9 in the constitution of South Africa?The citizens of South Africa are guaranteed equality before the law and freedom from discrimination under Section 9 of the South African Constitution. This right to equality is the first in the Bill of Rights, it ensures that there is no discrimination.
Thus, Section Nine of the Constitution of South Africa.
For more details about Section 9 in the constitution of South Africa, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1377349
#SPJ1
Related Questions
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as:
Answers
Answer:
A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).
This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.
Defendant is accused of the wrong doing?
Answers
Which of the following is not usually a divisive issue in American politics?
Answers
Answer:
try looking it up
Explanatio
i need help with this.
Answers
Answer:
D. Carrying of concealed weapons
t is important for a licensee or broker to remove ambiguity when a seller's unclear decision could be discriminatory by forcing the seller to
Answers
Answer: Articulate his or her concerns
Explanation:
If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.
NAME OF UNIT: CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR IN SOUTH AFRICA: A PSHYCHOSOCIAL APPROACH
1. What might some of the multiple causes of criminal behaviour be? (Maximum 300 words)
2. What might some of the multiple causes of criminal behaviour be? (Maximum 300 words)
3. How might psychophysiological factors be related to criminal behaviour? (Maximum 300 words)
4. What are the legal, social, and psychological definitions of delinquency? (Maximum 300 words)
5. What are the legal, social, and psychological definitions of delinquency? (Maximum 300 words)
6. What are the legal, social, and psychological definitions of delinquency? (Maximum 300 words)
Answers
Crime has many different causes. People break the law for a variety of reasons, including low self-esteem, liquor and drug abuse, poverty, and parental neglect.
Some people are more likely to commit crimes because of the circumstances in which they were born. It is undeniable that poor housing, social inequality, low educational attainment, poor diet, low self-esteem, and impulsivity are all interrelated factors that contribute to criminal behavior and substance use. Criminals share a number of characteristics with one another.
3. More importantly, psycho physiological research can contribute to the understanding of criminality and delinquency theories by revealing the mechanisms that underpin deviant behavior. Character factors impact one's proclivity towards horrendous act. Insane ism anticipated self-detailed misconduct, while high maniacal ism and neuroticism anticipated under socialization, as indicated by Levine ET Al
4. Wrongdoing alludes to conduct that abuses cultural lawful or moral standards; It typically refers to actions that, if carried out by an adult, would be considered illegal. Numerous individual circumstances and characteristics have been linked to the emergence of adolescent delinquency. Age, gender, issues during pregnancy and delivery, impulsivity, aggression, and substance abuse are individual traits.
Learn more about criminal behavior :
brainly.com/question/30450608
#SPJ4
when the unsuccessful party challenges the verdict and the judge in a jury trial decides that the evidence is so clear that reasonable people could not differ as to the outcome of the case, the judge grants a:
Answers
The judge in a jury trial will grant a petition for judgement notwithstanding the verdict where the losing party disputes the result and the court determines that the evidence is so conclusive that no reasonable person could have a different opinion as to the outcome of the case.
The counterpart of a motion in arrest of judgement in civil matters is a request for judgement notwithstanding the verdict. It could be submitted following the jury's verdict but prior to the entry of judgement. In spite of the jury's verdict, this motion asks the judge to grant the unsuccessful party a judgement.
A jury trial, often known as a trial by jury, is a court case in which the jury renders a verdict or factual findings. It differs from a bench trial where all judgements are made by a judge or panel of judges.
To learn more about jury trial here
brainly.com/question/12085109
#SPJ4
To establish proximate cause in a negligence claim, it is necessary to prove that the.
Answers
To establish proximate cause in a negligence claim, it is necessary to prove the foreseeability.
What is a proximate cause?A proximate cause, as used in law and insurance, is an incident that is sufficiently connected to an accident for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. In legal terms, there are two sorts of causation: cause-in-fact and proximal (or legal) cause. The "but for" test is used to determine cause-in-fact: The result would not have occurred if the activity had not taken place. The activity is a precondition for the injury, but it might not be sufficient in and of itself. The but for test fails in a few situations. A second criteria is used to decide if an activity is close enough to a harm in a "chain of events" to be considered legally acceptable because but-for causation is so simple to demonstrate.
To learn more about proximate cause, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12644777
#SPJ4
A married couple has been seeing a marriage therapist for three months because they were often fighting with each other. The counselor determines that an addiction to alcohol is one of the main causes that triggers fights. Therefore, the therapist recommends that the couple should see another counselor. What kind of counselor would the marriage therapist most likely recommend? Substance Abuse Counselor Religious Counselor Rehabilitation Counselor Mental Health Counselor
Answers
Answer:
Substance Abuse Councler
Explanation:
The substance abuse counselor is a mental health counselor specializing in treating patients who have a chemical dependency on drugs or alcohol. A substance abuse counselor works with their client to help them overcome their dependency and become self-sufficient. The substance abuse counselor may also work closely with the family of the client as substance abuse inevitably affects the loved ones of the chemically dependent person.
Substance Abuse Counselor kind of counselor would the marriage therapist most likely recommend. Thus, option (A) is correct.
What is a Counselor?Counselors assist clients dealing with a wide range of emotional and psychological issues in making lasting changes and/or improving their wellness. Clients may be struggling to manage their lives due to problems including depression, anxiety, stress, loss, and relationship problems.
The mental health counselor who specializes in treating people with chemical dependencies on drugs or alcohol is known as a substance misuse counselor. A drug abuse counselor assists their client in overcoming reliance and achieving independence.
Therefore, Thus, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about Counselor here:
https://brainly.com/question/28191007
#SPJ5
Which of the following was signed by the colonists to separate themselves politically from Britain?
Select one:
A. Declaration of Independence
B. Constitution
Answers
Answer:
By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists’ motivations for seeking independence. By declaring themselves an independent nation, the American colonists were able to confirm an official alliance with the Government of France and obtain French assistance in the war against Great Britain.
Explanation:
Paragraph
5. What impact did the creation of political parties ultimately have on the press?
Answers
fake marriage analysis and comparison
Answers
Answer:
to completion and you're analysis pls dont a person you trust
which domain relies most on statistical methods to identify fundamental traits?
Answers
Psychology, especially the field of personality psychology, is perhaps the one that uses statistical techniques to discover core features the most.
Understanding the basic features or characteristics that underlie individual variations in behaviour, cognition, and emotion is the focus of personality psychology. Large data sets gathered from personality tests, surveys, and other measurements are analyzed by personality psychologists using statistical techniques. The "Big Five" personality qualities (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism), which are believed to be universal across cultures, are only one example of the underlying personality dimensions that may be identified using these statistical techniques. Genetics, social psychology, and neuroscience are a few fields that, in addition to personality psychology, largely rely on statistical techniques to pinpoint core qualities. These areas study big data sets using statistical approaches to find patterns and correlations between variables, which can aid researchers in understanding the basic traits and underlying mechanisms of different occurrences.
To learn more about statistical , click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/30486056
#SPJ4
Which of these is an example of government corruption?
Answers
Answer:
Cronyism.
Explanation:
Answer:
cryonislism or however its spelt
Explanation:
Situation: A wanted to injure B. However, B died. Is a criminality liable?
Answers
Hope this helps.. :)
In preparation for the grand opening of his new business Dave's Diet Delights, Dave
orders 1,000 pounds of assorted dietetic sweets. Two days before his scheduled
grand opening, his supplier ships 1,000 pounds of rich, high-calorie sweets by
mistake. As a result, Dave has to postpone his grand opening for a week (until the
right goods arrive) and, in addition, has to spend $500 for new advertising and
posters with the new grand opening day. He also has to pay one week's salary to 2
employees, who have nothing to do in that time since the goods for the store have
not arrived, for a total of $800. In addition, he spends $100 to ship the goods back
to the supplier a the nonconforming supplier's suggestion. After the right goods
finally arrive, he sues the supplier. What damages can he ask for, and what damages
is he likely to recover? Explain fully.
Answers
The damages that Dave can ask for in his suit to his supplier are:
Costs to re-advertise the big day Salaries for the workers Shipping costs to send the goods back Reputational loss for the postponing of the eventThe damages that Dave is likely to recover are:
Costs to re-advertise the big day Shipping costs to send the goods back Reputational loss for the postponing of the event What damages will Dave receive?Dave spent $500 to re - advertise the big opening which are costs that he would not have incurred if the supplier had sent the right sweets. He can therefore get back damages for this.
Dave also can sue for the shipping costs to the supplier because the supplier was at fault and if they weren't, Dave would not have to have spent $100 on the shipping costs.
There are also reputational damages from postponing an opening ceremony. Some people who would have come would no longer be interested either because they are now busy, or because they don't trust Dave any more.
Dave would also be allowed to sue for his worker costs but there is a chance he doesn't get this if the other side argues that it isn't guaranteed he would have had any sales in the two weeks he paid them.
Find out more on damages at https://brainly.com/question/21943000
#SPJ1
describe at least 2 examples of how being the victim of violent crime can have an impact on an individual
Answers
Answer:
first example is it can have an emotional toll on an individual and cause them to go into depression.
second example is if the victim has to testify that can bring back the memory and will re open them to the trauma they suffered and they can become ashamed and think that everyone doesn't look at them the same way which makes them feel even worse about them selves until they can't stand to be around people anymore.
Explanation:
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Answers
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
"The Sahara is a huge desert." In this context, desert means
Answers
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case
a.
beyond a reasonable doubt.
b.
by a preponderance of the evidence.
c.
through a scintilla of evidence.
d.
to the extent promised in her attorney’s opening statement.
2. In Coastal Fishing Company’s suit against Dockside Marina, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Coastal’s favor. Dockside files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Coastal, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for
a.
a judgment in accordance with the verdict.
b.
a judgment as a matter of law.
c.
a new trial.
d.
judgment n.o.v.
3. Gabrielle files a suit against Hard ‘n Fast Adhesives, Inc. Hard ‘n Fast responds that even if Gabrielle’s statement of the facts is true, according to the law Hard n’ Fast is not liable. This is
a.
a counterclaim.
b.
a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
c.
a motion for summary judgment.
d.
a motion to dismiss.
4. Madison files a complaint in a suit against Christopher, and he files an answer. The case may now be
a.
appealed to a higher court.
b.
dismissed or settled.
c.
resolved but only after a trial.
d.
remanded for further proceedings.
Answers
2. C or A?
3. A.
4.A B or D.
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your iPhone to secretly record a conversation with him where he admits that he did, in fact, steal the shirts. He is awaiting trial, and you bring the recording to the police station to submit it as evidence. In your state, it is illegal to use a secretly recorded conversation in a court of law. In other words, this piece of evidence is inadmissible. Do you agree with this rule? In your answer, define the exclusionary rule and doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree, and explain how these terms apply to your situation.
Answers
Answer: I agree with this rule that secretly recorded conversations cannot be used as evidence in a court of law. I agree with this rule because with technology now days it would be all too easy to takes someones words out of contact or even rearrange what was said. This also violates our rights as Americans and takes away our privacy. The fruit of the poisonous tree rule is an extension of the exclusionary rule meaning, illegally gathered evidence cannot be admissible in a court of law, the fruit being the evidence and the poisonous tree being the means in which the evidence was gathered.
Explanation:
Sometimes civil cases do not make it to trial. The two sides may reach an agreement about the case through negotiation. What is this agreement? *
Answers
Mediation is a private and confidential dispute
resolution process in which an independent third party,
the mediator, seeks to assist the parties in reaching a
mutually acceptable settlement.
what is the penalty for scientific fraud in the science community
Answers
The penalty for scientific fraud in the science community are Loss of reputation, Retraction of publications, Termination of funding and grants, Professional sanctions and Loss of academic position
Scientific fraud is a serious ethical violation within the scientific community that undermines the integrity of research and erodes public trust in scientific findings. The penalties for scientific fraud can vary depending on the severity of the misconduct and the policies of the specific scientific institution or funding agency involved.
In many cases, scientific fraud can result in severe consequences for the individuals involved. Some of the penalties that can be imposed include:
1. Loss of reputation: Engaging in scientific fraud can permanently damage the reputation of the researcher. The discovery of fraudulent behavior can lead to a loss of trust and credibility within the scientific community and among peers.
2. Retraction of publications: If fraudulent data or results are identified in scientific publications, the affected papers may be retracted. Retractions are a significant mark against a researcher's reputation and can have a long-lasting impact on their career.
3. Termination of funding and grants: Funding agencies may revoke grants and financial support from researchers involved in scientific fraud. This can result in the loss of funding for ongoing projects and future research endeavors.
4. Professional sanctions: Scientific societies and organizations may impose professional sanctions on researchers found guilty of scientific fraud. This can include being barred from presenting at conferences, serving on committees, or participating in collaborative research projects.
5. Loss of academic position: In severe cases, scientific fraud can lead to the termination of employment or academic positions. Institutions may choose to dismiss researchers involved in misconduct to protect the integrity of their research programs.
Additionally, legal consequences may arise in cases where scientific fraud involves financial fraud or violations of research regulations. This can include civil lawsuits or even criminal charges.
It is important to note that the penalties for scientific fraud are designed to maintain the integrity of scientific research and protect the interests of the scientific community and society at large. They serve as a deterrent and emphasize the importance of honesty, integrity, and ethical conduct in scientific inquiry.
Know more about Penalty here:
https://brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ8
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
Answers
Which responsibility of citizens in a democracy do the media best support?
A Making informed decisions when voting
8. Serving onjuries
Paying taxes
Running for local office
Answers
Answer:
A. Making informed decisions when voting.
Explanation:
This question as well as the answer choices are oddly worded. However, the media is responsible for informing the public. While they are often biased and sometimes inaccurately representing the state of affairs, they inform the public nonetheless. Serving on juries and paying taxes don't really have anything to do with the media's duties. You could say running for local office, but the media is truly just an information source. While they may support someone running for office, they may also oppose and bash them. Therefore, they are most qualified to aid in the public making informed decisions when they vote.
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
Answers
It is true that courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision if the actual amount of damages is difficult to determine and the total amount is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
A court considers two factors when deciding whether a liquidated damages provision is a penalty:
(1) the rationality of the dollar value specified and
(2) the complexity of deciding and asserting actual damages in the event of a breach.
However, a liquidated damage provision that is viewed as a "penalty" unconnected to any anticipated or actual loss is unlikely to be enforced by a court.
Learn more on liquidated damages damages-https://brainly.com/question/28498187
#SPJ4
The question was incomplete. Check below the full question.
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm. There are two general categories of remedies—legal and equitable.
How do elections impact the supreme court? Discuss how the roles of the president and senate affect the supreme court and how the political makeup of the senate and president can impact it.
Answers
Elections can impact the Supreme Court through the roles of the President and Senate. The President nominates justices to the Court, and the Senate has the power to confirm or reject those nominations. The political makeup of the Senate and President can greatly impact the composition and decisions of the Court.
When a Supreme Court vacancy arises, the President has the authority to nominate a new justice. This nomination is then sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. The Senate Judiciary Committee holds confirmation hearings and then votes to send the nomination to the full Senate for a vote. The Senate can confirm the nominee by a simple majority vote, or they can reject the nominee.
The political makeup of the Senate and President can play a significant role in the confirmation process. If the President and Senate are of the same political party, it is generally easier for the President to get their nominee confirmed.
To know more about Elections, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ4
The final step in obtaining a Learner's Permit is:
A. Touching your nose while walking a straight line
B. Obtaining a Certificate of Enrollment from your school
C.Showing proof of residence
D. None of the above
Answers
Jason and jennifer are a husband and wife living in california. jason buys a home in california for them to live in, but the deed only shows jason as the owner. does jennifer have any ownership rights to the home? explain your answer.
Answers
Jason is simultaneously linguistically multilingual.
What traits distinguish bilingualism?Bilingualism is the capacity to express oneself and converse in two languages. The following traits are typical of bilinguals: may come from a dual-language culture or from a single culture. could or could not have equal proficiency in both languages.
What use does bilingualism serve?According to the hypothesis of the bilingual advantage, cognitive abilities, particularly executive functions, are improved by the constant need to govern both of the recognized languages that are constantly engaged in the brain.
The usage of one's mother tongue can aid in the comprehension of words and phrases in foreign languages. No artificial context is required to explain basic meanings of words and sentences.
To know more about bilingualism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13913120
#SPJ4
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answers
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.