The excerpt is from an African American poem called “The Black Man’s Burden.”

Pile on the Black Man’s Burden.
'Tis nearest at your door;
Why heed long bleeding Cuba,
or dark Hawaii’s shore?
Hail ye your fearless armies,
Which menace feeble folks
Who fight with clubs and arrows
and brook your rifle’s smoke.
–H.T. Johnson, The Black Man’s Burden, 1899

What point of view does the poem’s author express?

Cuba and Hawaii could benefit most from imperialism.
Imperialist armies are easily repelled by native armies.
Imperialism is more about bullying than heroism.
African Americans were wrong to fight imperialism.

The answer to the question is option 3, physical education and sport were no better off than they were during the middle ages. During the Renaissance and Reformation, the groundwork was laid for different attitudes about sport and physical education.

Different theories of how the body should be viewed were developed, such as the humoral theory and the idea that the body could be improved through exercise.

This led to the development of physical education and sport as an important part of schooling, with educational institutions such as the University of Padua becoming known for their physical education programs.

The development of physical education and sport during the Renaissance and Reformation was a marked improvement over the Middle Ages, when physical activity was seen as a leisure activity rather than an educational tool.

Know more about Renaissance here

https://brainly.com/question/17646820#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The spirits of one's ancestors most important to the ancient Chinese Option(a) is correct. Learning the historical backdrop of our ancestors assists us with acquiring a more prominent comprehension of the difficulties they confronted, and it frequently motivates more noteworthy love and empathy for their defects and errors.

What does Ancestors means?

An ancestor, otherwise called a progenitor, front senior or a forebear, is a parent or (recursively) the parent of a predecessor.

Two people have a hereditary relationship on the off chance that one is the ancestor of the other or on the other hand assuming that they share a typical ancestor. In transformative hypothesis, species what share a developmental ancestor are supposed to be of normal plummet.

Nonetheless, this idea of parentage doesn't make a difference to certain microbes and different life forms fit for flat quality exchange. Some examination proposes that the typical individual has two times however many female ancestors as male ancestors.

On the off chance that individuals in this populace meet and breed aimlessly, it just so happens, you just have to return a normal of 20 ages before you find a person who is a typical ancestor of everybody in the populace.

Therefore Option(a) is correct.

Answer:

People become more exposed to different cultures and are given access to different recipes, languages, foods, animals, and traditions

Explanation:

Explanation:

gautam buddha(siddhartha gautam)

hope this helps

Answer: Gautam buddha(siddhartha gautam

Explanation: By finding the way to Enlightenment, Siddhartha was driven from the agony of affliction and resurrection towards the way of Enlightenment and got known as the Buddha or "stirred one."

Hope this Helps!

Answer:

struggling farmers

Explanation:

when President Franklin Roosevelt signed into the law the agriculture adjustment act on May 12th 1933 among the law goals where to limiting crop production reducing stock numbers and refinancing mortgages with terms more favorable towards struggling farmers hope this helps :)

Answer:

It established the Agricultural Adjustment Administration under Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace to effect a “domestic allotment” plan that would subsidize producers of basic commodities for…

Answer:

C. civic responsibilities

Explanation:

A civic duty is an obligation, or something a citizen MUST do because the law says so. If you do not follow these, you will face legal consequences.

Examples include:

. Paying taxes

. Obeying laws,

. Attending school

. Serving on jury duty

Rights are freedoms that are guaranteed, and they cannot be taken away under any circumstances. Rights that are given to citizens are stated in the Bill of Rights.

Examples include:

. Free Speech, peaceful protesting, and religion

. Right to bear arms

. Security in unreasonable searches and seizures (warrants must be issued)

. Freedom from self-incrimination (the police must inform you of your rights)

. Freedom from double jeopardy (being charged with the same crime twice)

. A speedy and public trial

. Protection from cruel or unusual punishments

A civic responsibility is not something that is required, instead it is something a citizen SHOULD do. If you do not do these, you WILL NOT face legal consequences.

Examples include:

. Volunteering

. Voting

. Respecting others

. Be informed of government actions.

Naturalization is the legal process a person must preform in order to become a U.S citizen if you were born outside the country.

Naturalization requirements:

. The person to be at least 18 years old

. Have a good moral character (not being charged with certain crimes)

. Live in the U.S. for at least 5 years

. Understand English

. Have knowledge about U.S History and civics and pass the exam

. Take the Oath of Allegiance (loyalty to the country)

In the question it states that citizens are “encouraged” to respect others and tolerate diversity, meaning they SHOULD. It also states that the government cannot force citizens to be respectful, so they do not have to and won’t face any penalty because it isn’t a law. Hence, it is discussing civic responsibilities.

Answer:The great movement of people from rural to urban areas was unique to the United States. Both baseball and football appealed primarily to working-class males.

Explanation:

(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*.✧

Answer:

A: It was a model document for other New England colonies

Explanation:

They were British colonists, it was the first time a colony had  self-governed, not all the answers are correct

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Here we have no question. Just a statement.

What is your question? What do you want to know?

If this is a true or false question, the correct answer is "False."

It is false that the NAACP and SCLC are civil rights organizations started by impatient young blacks who wanted to see immediate progress.

It was totally opposed. These black people organizations were created by African Americans that knew the social conditions were not favorable for black people in America, and despite that, they had the patience, commitment, perseverance, and dedication to fight for the civil rights of the African Americans.

The NAACP was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The SCLC was the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

Answer:

The Middle Ages in Europe took place after the Roman collapse in the 5th century CE to the period of Renaissance during the 13th-15th century.  It was first introduced by Italians with talent engaging in a revival of Classical learning and culture.  A few men especially Petrarch were very conspicuous among people in the middle age.  The humanists in the era did invent it in order to distinguish themselves in different eras from one another.  In such areas of the world, the Middle Ages can be described as a respectable period of history standing out from other eras like the Ming Dynasty.

Answer:

The cartoon is saying that both sides felt betrayed, or felt a different way about each other that leaded to a conflict between both parties.

Explanation:

The text boxes states almost the same thing but with different words here and there. These words show they feel differently but the same in a way.

The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about Schenck v. United States

brainly.com/question/2764676

#SPJ1

Answer:

In my Option i believe that the government should protect constitutional rights at all costs. BUT it depends on the crisis really.  People do deseve there rights. But if something was to happen like the apocalypse then the goverment should do what ever is necessary for the saftey of the people even if it is unconstitutional.  If that makes sense

Explanation:

Explanation:

Researchers believe that H. sapiens only truly became a global species during a later migration, spreading out across much of Asia and down into Australia after about 60,000 years ago. Even then, the earliest dates for the arrival of modern humans in Europe come in at roughly 42,000 years AGO. Have a exquisite day!

Answer:

inherited a substantial American commitment to maintain South Vietnam

Explanation:

At the beginning of 1964, the Lyndon Johnson administration inherited a substantial American commitment to maintain South Vietnam. This was evident back in Kennedy's administration in 1963, where the overthrown government of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Die was supported by the Kennedy administration.

John F. Kennedy, would later died in November 1963, as a result of assassination, led to the Lyndon B Johnson to continue his administration as president.

Hence, at the beginning of 1964, the Lyndon Johnson administration inherited a substantial American commitment to maintain South Vietnam.

Answer:

1900 and 1920.

Explanation:

According to the given automobile ownership chart from the year 1900 to 1950 we can see that from the year 1900 to 1920 there is a smallest increased in car ownership and after that, there is a slightly increased from the year 1920 to the year 1950 that represents the bar graph shows an upward movement  

Hence, the first option is correct

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

I just took the test and got 100%

French Jesuits encouraged the spread of Christianity in the Americas is by settling large numbers of priests throughout New France.

Their strategy of gathering natives into enclosed missions where they could teach and convert them more easily. The Jesuits also believed in living in native villages and adapting to their way of life, rather than imposing European customs on them. It is important to note that the Jesuits did not use threats of violence or force to convert the natives, but instead relied on building relationships and gaining trust.

Learn more about French Jesuits: https://brainly.com/question/11103855

#SPJ11

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Upland simply refers to a land that is hilly. They are refered to as the areas that are high and above the sea level. They usually contain mountains, have high rainfall, and also have lower temperatures.

Upland can be found in the western part of Europe such as Norway, Denmark and Sweden. People in upland areas typically engage in agriculture.

Explanation:

D. Oppose the use of alcohol on religious grounds.

The Second Great Awakening was a Protestant religious revival movement in the United States that lasted from the late 18th to the mid-19th century. It inspired a wide range of social and moral reforms, including temperance, the abolition of slavery, and women's rights. One of the most prominent issues that the revival addressed was the use of alcohol, which was seen as a major social problem and a threat to the moral fabric of society. As a result, many reformers became involved in the temperance movement and advocated for the prohibition of alcohol on religious and moral grounds

Answer:

The understand of history, and its study has changed over the period.

Explanation:

The change has occurred in the study of history and the way of thinking gradually as with years passing. History in the previous period was more reliable on the few discoveries with little knowledge of the region. It has remained unreliable in assessing future change. The recent changes are the development of technology in discovering and the internet, which gave access to materials on a vast level. Critical thinking is vital for understanding history as once a person search into the past. A continuous search for primary sources and examine ancient or medieval history with reading the sources, one can quickly learn that some of past sources are suspect.

To answer this question, we must split into parts. The first part will be identifying and defining the philosophies, the second part will be applying the political philosophies towards the events, and the last part is to identify whether or not King George in fact has violated the social contract. Before we start to identify the philosophies, it is important to ask, What is a social construct? A social construct, in this case, is "an ideal that has been created and accepted by society".

Identifying and defining the philosophies

One of the most important information to understand is that all three of the political philosophies share some common denominator. In each, they agree that in order to obtain societal stability and peace, individuals who partake in society must be able to give up some forms of their naturalistic freedoms in order to create a just and fair society. In a utopian nature, this can be defined as what is morally right, and that that, which is deemed as morally right in this case, would be legitimized and established. In the idealistic sense, a person would surrender individual supreme freedom in order to allow society to grant every individual ' "equal rights" '.  

However, each individual philosophies differ on the natural rights, humanistic rights, and relinquished rights. Thomas Hobbes, for example, states that humans have all natural rights, and that they may peruse their individual rights for self-preservation (Person vs. Nature, Person vs. Society). However, humans are generally sociable people, and to be able to not only prolong but also to advance humanity, individual rights are sacrificed for what can be termed as the greater good. Hobbes takes the stance of a autocracy that in return for the sacrificed rights, must provide security and safety. If however, the autocracy fails to ensure their safety, then the Individuals may leave. John Locke, on the other hand, while building upon Hobbes' philosophy, called for limitation of autocracy, and instead calls for a central authority that guarantees the fundamental rights, but can be replaced if it fails at its role. Jean-Jacques Rousseau established that society and government is on equal footing and that both are dependent on each other not only in protecting individual free will, but also representing the will of the people.

Violations of King George (examples)

In the Declaration of Independence, the colonists exemplify the violations of King George, in which he not only impedes on the rights of society, but also in turn individual rights. For example, it is stated that, quote:

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. (Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson)

Rousseau's position, in this case, supports the case in point. The Representative House of the Parliament is the elected officials by the populations. First, we must define dissolved (to close down or dismiss). As such, King George impede on the rights of society in failing to give them a voice in the government (Rousseau).

For another example:

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to term and formidable to tyrants only.

Hobbes and Rosseau's positions, in this case, supports the case in point. King George relinquishes the rights of the people (A example of Hobbes' sacrificing individual rights for the "greater good").

Hobbes's position can be exemplified by the laws passed during this time:

- Quartering Act of 1765: Sacrificing individual rights to property to house British soldiers in the name of security of the general public.

- [Any Act that is passed for] tax: Sacrificing individual income and paying taxes for everyday items in an effort to pay off debts incurred.

Rosseau, on the other hand, supports this position as the people did not ask for the protection, and the soldiers impede on the individual freedom, that being privacy, in this particular situation.

As seen in the examples, each individual grievance can be taken to fall under the failure to uphold the rights of the people, and either can be defined under the philosophy or is an example for the philosophy.

You may use the examples applied above as well as the philosophies definitions to understand which violations can fall under which philosophy.

--

Learn more about the philosophies, as well as their application to the justifications used in the US's Declaration of Independence, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2805349 - Comparison of Democratic theories.

https://brainly.com/question/579893 - Why are people willing to enter into a social contract?

Answer: E

Explanation:

The significance of the Declaration of Independence was that its set forth the ideas and principles behind a just & fair government which is observed in the Constitution.

Toward end of revolutionary war, the declaration was created and  declared that U.S. were independent from Britain and that a new country would be formed out of its former colonies. The idea therein were mainly inspired by an Enlightenment ideas which were natural rights, liberty, private property and equality.

In conclusion, the founding document broke all political ties between American colonies & Great Britain and set forth the new ideas and principles behind a just and fair government as well as how the government would function.

Read more about Declaration of Independence

brainly.com/question/9515546

#SPJ1

Evans-Pritchard, a British anthropologist, discovered that their language practices involved a complex system of beliefs and rituals, which played a significant role in their social organization and daily life.

Evans-Pritchard, a British anthropologist, conducted extensive research on the Azande people in the early twentieth century. He discovered that their language practices involved a complex system of beliefs and rituals, which played a significant role in their social organization and daily life.

The Azande language, part of the Niger-Congo language family, was integral to their communication and understanding of the world around them. One key aspect Evans-Pritchard highlighted was their use of "oracle" practices, which provided guidance and insight on various issues, such as interpersonal conflicts and decision-making.

Through the study of the Azande language, Evans-Pritchard also uncovered the importance of witchcraft beliefs in their society. He found that the Azande attributed both positive and negative events to witchcraft, and it served as a means to explain the unexplainable. These beliefs helped maintain social order and harmony within the community.

Overall, Evans-Pritchard's discoveries regarding the Azande language practices shed light on the intricacies of their society, providing a better understanding of their cultural identity and worldview.

Know more about Evans-Pritchard here,

https://brainly.com/question/3635886

#SPJ11

Answer:

It would be necessary to have access to primary sources such as Nataniel Bacons' diaries, as well as letters or other documents made by him.

Explanation:

A primary source is a document that depicts events (or talks about a person) and that was created at the time that these events are happening. Thus, if an individual wishes to help, with the search for sources, another person who is making allegations about a film by Nathaniel Bacons, that individual must look for documents made by Bacons himself who attest to the statements mentioned or disprove them. For that, letters, diaries, tickets, essays or any other document created by Bacons would be needed.

Louisiana Purchase summary: The United States bought 828,000 square miles of land from France in 1803. The French controlled this region from 1699 until 1762 when it became Spanish property because France gave it to Spain as a present, since they were allies. But under Napoleon Bonaparte, France revived the aspirations to build an empire in North America so the territory was taken back in 1800. However, those big plans were not meant to be because Napoleon needed to concentrate on preparations for war with the British Empire and so the land was sold to the United States. The price was 15 million dollars.

The purchased territory included the whole of today’s Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, parts of Minnesota and Louisiana west of Mississippi River, including New Orleans, big parts of North and northeastern New Mexico, South Dakota, northern Texas, some parts of Wyoming, Montana, and Colorado as well as portions of Canadian provinces Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Thomas Jefferson was the American president at the time of the Louisiana Purchase. The United States initially wanted to buy only New Orleans and the land around it. The purchase met with the strong opposition in the States on account of being unconstitutional. Those accusations were accurate, at least to some extent. President Jefferson couldn’t deny that the Constitution of the United States did not provide for acquiring new territories but still he decided to proceed with the purchase since the removal of French presence in the region was such an important issue.

Answer: Louisiana Purchase summary: The United States bought 828,000 square miles of land from France in 1803. ... The United States initially wanted to buy only New Orleans and the land around it. The purchase met with the strong opposition in the States on account of being unconstitutional.

Explanation: Louisiana Purchase summary: The United States bought 828,000 square miles of land from France in 1803. The French controlled this region from 1699 until 1762 when it became Spanish property because France gave it to Spain as a present, since they were allies. But under Napoleon Bonaparte, France revived the aspirations to build an empire in North America so the territory was taken back in 1800. However, those big plans were not meant to be because Napoleon needed to concentrate on preparations for war with the British Empire and so the land was sold to the United States. The price was 15 million dollars.

The purchased territory included the whole of today’s Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, parts of Minnesota and Louisiana west of Mississippi River, including New Orleans, big parts of North and northeastern New Mexico, South Dakota, northern Texas, some parts of Wyoming, Montana, and Colorado as well as portions of Canadian provinces Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Former President Donald Trump's appointments of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court have had and will continue to have a significant impact on the court.

These appointments have shifted the balance of the court to a more conservative majority, potentially influencing the direction of future legal decisions.
Neil Gorsuch: Gorsuch was appointed by President Trump in 2017 to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Gorsuch is considered a conservative judge who emphasizes textualism and originalism in his interpretation of the Constitution. His appointment restored the ideological balance on the court following Scalia's passing.
Brett Kavanaugh: Kavanaugh's appointment in 2018 was contentious and marked by intense public scrutiny during his confirmation hearings. Kavanaugh's judicial record suggests he leans conservative, although he has also demonstrated an independent streak in some cases. His appointment solidified the conservative majority on the court, potentially influencing its decisions on a range of issues.
Amy Coney Barrett: Barrett's appointment in 2020 was also met with significant attention and controversy. As a conservative jurist, she is expected to interpret the Constitution in a textualist and originalist manner, similar to Justice Gorsuch. Her appointment further solidified the conservative majority on the court, potentially shaping its rulings for years to come.

Learn more about Constitution link:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ11

Article of confederation prohibited the federal government from taxing the people or creating a standing army.

     The first constitution of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, which was in effect from 1776 until 1789. The Articles established a little federal government and gave the states the lion's share of authority. Since the federal government lacked the authority to enact or enforce tax laws or control commerce, the US economy suffered under the Articles.

    Shays's Rebellion, a Massachusetts revolt of Revolutionary War veterans that both the state and federal governments failed to quell due to a lack of unified military authority, served as an example of the need for a more robust political structure.

To learn more about Article of Confederation click here:

https://brainly.com/question/18959300

#SPJ9