The ________ defense arises from a plaintiff's knowing and willing undertaking of an activity made dangerous by the negligence of another.

Answer:

the answer is D

Explanation:

Answer:

best answer ever

Explanation:

So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l,  I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.

Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.

Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.

Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.

Answer:

Hello There!!

Explanation:

The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)

hope this helps, have a great day!!

~Pinky~

In "Brown v. Texas," the Court considered the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The case involved two individuals who were stopped by police officers and asked to identify themselves, without any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The Court held that the stop and identification statute, under which the individuals were detained, violated the Fourth Amendment.

To determine the constitutionality of DWI roadblocks or checkpoints, the Supreme Court has generally considered three factors:

Purpose: The checkpoint must have a primary purpose related to public safety, such as detecting impaired drivers or verifying driver's licenses.

Location and Duration: The checkpoint's location and duration should be based on relevant factors, such as the history of alcohol-related incidents in the area and the effectiveness of the checkpoint.

Guidelines and Discretion: The checkpoint should be conducted pursuant to specific guidelines or protocols, minimizing the discretion of the officers on-site and reducing the potential for arbitrary or intrusive searches.

It's important to note that the specific details and guidelines surrounding DWI roadblocks and checkpoints can vary among states, as they may have their own laws and regulations. If you have concerns or questions about DWI roadblocks or checkpoints in your state, it's best to consult the specific laws and legal precedents within your jurisdiction.

Learn more about law enforcement here

https://brainly.com/question/31597958

#SPJ4

The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.

Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:

https://brainly.com/question/1172086

#SPJ11

The  law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.

The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:

https://brainly.com/question/5481344

#SPJ1

The statement that reflects the difference between the current status and philosophy of prisons operations and that which existed before the 1970s is that even though the past few years have seen a modest decline, the current prison population is much larger than in the 1970s because of the "tough on crime" mentality of the public and elected officials.

What is philosophy?Philosophy is a branch of study that attempts to understand and explain the universe's nature, existence, and reality. It is a comprehensive and crucial subject that raises fundamental questions about how humans perceive and experience the world around them.The prison population in the United States has grown dramatically since the 1970s, and many factors contribute to this increase, including changes in the criminal justice system, harsher drug sentences, and the increasing number of individuals serving life sentences.

The "tough on crime" approach adopted by public and elected officials is responsible for the rise of the prison population, as is reflected in the statement above.The statement, "The current prison population is much larger compared to the prison population before the 1970s," is factual, but it doesn't explain why there's a difference between the current status and philosophy of prison operations and that which existed before the 1970s.

to know more about philosophy visit
https://brainly.com/question/33634242
#SPJ11

Answer:

The gcf of 12 and 18 is 6

Explanation:

Answer:

6

Explanation:

Answer:

Assuming that you pay back an equal amount each month and that the payment will be completed by the end of the third month.

500/3 = 166.6666666

So you will be paying back $166.6666666 each month.

$333.3333333 for the first two months.

$166.6666666 the third month.

These are the exact numbers but you should probably round them to make it simpler in your answer.

Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\

The manager should inform Sarah about the company policy and her rights in its implementation in this regard

Harassment at work is a serious issue, and most businesses have well-defined policies in place to address it. The victim of harassment must have confidence that her complaint will be taken seriously, transparently, fairly, and in a timely manner. She also needs to know that her identity will be kept private and only shared with those who need to know.

In this case, Sarah is dealing with an embarrassing situation at work that is making her uncomfortable, and she has decided to notify the HR Manager of the situation. The HR Manager should reassure her that the complaint will be thoroughly investigated. She should be made aware of the investigation's process and potential next steps. She should be informed about the company policy and her rights regarding its implementation. Sarah's concerns about her confidentiality should be addressed in accordance with policy and with empathy.

Learn more about manager on:

https://brainly.com/question/24553900

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. They contain members of both major political parties.

Explanation:

Correct on Edg 2020

Answer:

C. They contain members from both houses of Congress

Explanation:

Edge 2022

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.

The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.

As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.

To learn more about Indonesia, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31792781

#SPJ4

Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.

In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.

Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.

To know more about law:

brainly.com/question/30133385

#SPJ4

Answer:

Powers; spending power; banking power; taxing power; fifth amendment; fourteenth amendment; liberty; life; property; law.

Explanation:

A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens. In the United States of America, the federal government has various powers granted by Acts of Congress and Article II of the U.S constitution such as Ordinance power, Appointment power, Implied power, Executive power, Financial power etc.

Hence, the Constitution grants the federal government several financial powers, which include the spending power, banking power, and taxing power. Even though federal government is given certain powers, its power is limited by the fifth amendment and fourteenth amendment. These amendments prohibit the national government from depriving any person of liberty, life, or property without due process of law.

The 5th and 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and they address the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.

The statement "Each judicial had his or her personal beliefs and philosophy, which shape the legal reasoning process" is true.

The legal reasoning process is shaped by each judge's personal beliefs and philosophy. A judge's beliefs and philosophies can influence how they interpret the law, determine the facts of the case, and reach a decision.It's critical to keep in mind that a judge's personal beliefs and philosophies should be kept separate from their professional responsibilities. Judges should base their decisions on the law and legal precedent, rather than their personal beliefs or biases. However, it's difficult to completely ignore one's personal views, and it's only natural for them to play a role in the decision-making process.

Learn more about  judicial here:

https://brainly.com/question/20214003

#SPJ11

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Because "boro" is known for having low coefficients of thermal expansion.

The amendment that deals with the scenario of Mark being arrested and sent before a grand jury is the Fifth Amendment.

The Fifth Amendment includes several provisions related to criminal proceedings, including the right to a grand jury for capital crimes (i.e., crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment), protection against double jeopardy (i.e., being tried twice for the same offense), the right against self-incrimination (i.e., the right to remain silent), and the right to due process of law.

In the scenario described, Mark was sent before a grand jury to determine if there was enough evidence to bind him over for a criminal trial that could result in his being punished by death. This is an example of the Fifth Amendment's provision regarding the right to a grand jury for capital crimes.

Find out more on the Fifth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/29528178

#SPJ1

The full question is:

What amendment do the Constitution is involved in the following scenario?

Mark was arrested on suspicion of murder and was sent before a grand jury, where his case was tried in front of jurors to decide if there was enough evidence to bind him over for a criminal trial that could result in his being punished by death.

Answer:

B - Major Crime

Explanation:

Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Locard's Exchange Principle explains that states that there's a transfer of material when there's contact between two objects.

According to Locard's Exchange Principle, someone who commits q particular crime will bring a particular thing to a crime scene and also leave with something as well. An example is that the person can leave DNA, hair, blood, latent prints, etc.

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Determine whether the following scenarios are a violation of or are in compliance  with the United States Constitution and label them accordingly, being sure to include  the constitutional amendment related to the situation.

Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence.

Answer: In compliance  with the United States Constitution. Sixth Amendment.

Explanation:

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures the rights of criminal offenders. One of those rights is to "have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor," which is what Tyrell has done in this scenario.

Other guaranteed rights are having a public trial, a lawyer, an impartial jury, and the knowledge about the accusers, the charges, and the evidence.

A personal injury lawsuit may be able to be filed by a person who suffers an injury as a result of a breach of duty of care.

They might be able to get compensation for their injuries, such as medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering, if they are successful.

A claimant who has suffered loss or damage as a result of a wrong for which the defendant is responsible is entitled to a payment known as damages. A right to damages can be established by statute or common law.

To begin, a claim for damages must first be based on a breach of contract, regardless of the nature of those damages. That is, if neither party has committed a breach of contract, there can be no claim for damages. Second, the party asserting a claim for damages must demonstrate the loss.

Learn more about claim damages:

brainly.com/question/30707485

#SPJ1

Even if a defendant may have violated a duty of care owed to the plaintiff through negligence, this violation is not actionable unless the plaintiff sustains harm to themselves or their property.

That is, in order to be eligible for damages, the plaintiff must have experienced some sort of loss. The amount of damages that can be recovered depends on how the accident has affected the plaintiff's life or line of work.

After establishing that the party being sued (the "defendant") owed the plaintiff a duty of care, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant disregarded that duty (or "breached" it), that the plaintiff was harmed (suffered damages) and that the plaintiff's harm was actually brought on by the defendant's breach (causation).

To learn more about plaintiff visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29213554

#SPJ1

To be clotured, a motion or resolution to amend the Senate's Standing Rules must be supported by two-thirds of the senators present and voting.

If a cloture vote fails, the measure's discussion for the day is concluded. When the bill is brought back up for consideration, there must be two additional hours of discussion before another cloture motion may be considered.

Discussion is limited by the cloture. The procedure is drawn out. Additionally, senators are concerned because they adhere to the custom of open debate and worry that the frequent use of cloture will reduce the effectiveness of the filibuster that they may seek to use in certain circumstances.

To know more about Senate, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29398416

#SPJ4

Answer:

to treat someone or something in an unfair way they did her a grave ijustice is by not allowing her to file complaint

Answer:

Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of holding ... The Rule of Law and Democracy Section stands as OHCHR focal point for ... Since its establishment in 2006, the Human Rights Council (successor to the ... relevant intergovernmental bodies and international organizations, published a .

Explanation:

The First Amendment forbids placing restrictions on corporate funding of independent broadcasts during candidate elections, the Supreme Court ruled on a \(5-4\) vote. The justices ruled that the government's justification for placing restrictions on corporate spending preventing corruption was insufficient to justify limiting political speech.

Political speech is commentary on issues of general interest. Speech "deals with matters of public concern" when it "can fairly be considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community," according to the Supreme Court. Political speech includes any discussion of social issues as well as speech by the government or candidates for office. Political speech is defined as speech relating to the state, government, body politic, or public administration as it relates to governmental policy-making. A political speech must contain elements that are powerful and instantly engage your audience.

Learn more about political speech here

https://brainly.com/question/1777088

#SPJ4

A development in the political or legal aspect of the overall is a court decision opposing the illegal termination of employees. Unlawful termination of an employment contract or wrongful dismissal without due process is against the law of contracts.

To know more about  wrongful discharge, refer to this link:

https://brainly.com/question/4303507

#SPJ4