The state plan, which is a sort of law that safeguards health and safety, should be used to fill in the specified gap as the proper response.
What does public health law mean?According to one definition of public health legislation, it is the state's responsibility and power to provide the conditions necessary for people to be healthy. It also places restrictions on the state's authority to impede individual and corporate freedom, privacy, and propriety interests (Gostin, 2000).
India's Top 7 Traffic Regulations to Obey:
Wear your seatbelt while driving a car. Riding a Two-Wheeler without a helmet on. Using a mobile phone while riding. Overspeeding. Jumping the Red Light. Don't drink and drive. Always have a valid auto insurance policy.Thus, road safety law is a type of law example of a plan of the state.
Learn more about Road safety law :
https://brainly.com/question/16901094
#SPJ1
The brokerage relationship that is presumed to exist is
Answer:
what is that or something
Answer:
Transaction broker
Explanation:
For this assignment, you will describe and compare the powers and responsibilities of each branch of the federal government. To do this, you will complete the following steps:
Reflect: Identify the institutions, powers, and responsibilities of each branch of the federal government.
Analyze: Answer questions about the roles each branch plays in carrying out the powers of government.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.
Based on what you've learned about the three branches of the federal government, answer the following questions. If you need help remembering the details about each branch, go back through the contents of this unit. This section is worth 9 points.
1. List the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the federal government. (6 points)
Branch of government
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Responsibilities
Powers (identify at least two powers for each branch)
2. Describe at least one way in which the executive branch is able to influence the actions of the legislative branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the judicial branch. (1 point)
3. Describe at least one way in which the legislative branch is able to influence the actions of the judicial branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the executive branch. (1 point)
4. Describe at least one way in which the judicial branch is able to influence the actions of the legislative branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the executive branch. (1 point)
Now that you have reflected on the powers and responsibilities of each branch, answer the following questions. This section is worth 11 points.
1. The federal government creates the laws that govern the entire nation. Compare the role each branch of government plays in this process and explain which branch plays the most important role in creating laws. (3 points)
2. The federal government is responsible for enforcing laws and carrying out policies. Compare the role each branch of government plays in this process and explain which branch plays the most important role in enforcing laws and carrying out policies. (3 points)
3. The federal government was established by the U.S. Constitution, which created a system of check and balances. Compare the ways each branch balances out the other branches' powers and explain how the judicial branch plays a critical role in maintaining the system of checks and balances. (3 points)
4. Based on what you have learned, which branch of government do you believe has the most power overall? Support your opinion with examples. (2 points)
A legislature is a deliberative assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country or city. Legislatures form important parts of most governments; in the separation of powers model, they are often contrasted with the executive and judicial branches of parliamentary government.
Laws enacted by legislatures are usually known as primary legislation. In addition, legislatures may observe and steer governing actions, with authority to amend the budget involved.
The members of a legislature are called legislators. In a democracy, legislators are most commonly popularly elected, although indirect election and appointment by the executive are also used, particularly for bicameral legislatures featuring an upper chamber.
The executive is the branch of government exercising authority in and holding responsibility for the governance of a state. The executive executes and enforces law.
In political systems based on the principle of separation of powers, authority is distributed among several branches —an attempt to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single group of people. In such a system, the executive does not pass laws or interpret them . Instead, the executive enforces the law as written by the legislature and interpreted by the judiciary. The executive can be the source of certain types of law, such as a decree or executive order
The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law or enforce law, but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.
In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.
A legislative body is responsible for the ongoing power to enact laws for a political unit, such as a nation or city. Usually referred to as primary legislation, laws passed by legislatures.
What is The legislative branch?The legislative branch can approve presidential appointments, manage the budget, impeach the president, and force him or her to resign from office by using their power and authority.
The ability to veto laws that the legislative branch adopts belongs to the executive branch and the president. The judicial branch has the power to invalidate legislation that the legislative branch has passed.
When state laws and regulations are found to be incompatible with a higher standard, such as primary legislation, courts having judicial review authority may revoke those laws and regulations.
Learn more about the legislative branch, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8338696
#SPJ3
What is the term that means putting a person under fear
Answer:
Frighten
Explanation:
..............
A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here.
true or false
A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here is a false statement.
What is a business ?A business can be defined as an organization that carries out transactions like sending a commodity or rendering service and for that they are being paid some money.
A defendant who has few encounters with both the state is one who does not violate the principles of substantial fairness as well as fair play.
The minimum connections test is a careful balance that aims to strike a balance between the reasonableness of requiring a criminal to go to the territory of a country to argue against one complaint there and the sum of the accused's connections only with the host state.
Learn more about business , here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ1
Which of the following BEST describes the “rule of four”?
A.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.
B.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.
C.
It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision on the Court.
D.
The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case
Answer:
i think its B
Explanation:
if the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the securities act of 1933 requires that:
If the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the Securities Act of 1933 requires that the securities being offered must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unless they are exempt from registration.
The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the sale of securities in the United States. Its purpose is to ensure that investors are provided with sufficient information about securities being offered for sale so they can make informed investment decisions.
The act requires companies that offer securities for sale to the public to provide detailed financial and other information about the securities, the company, and its management.
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 prohibits the offer or sale of any security through the use of the mails or other means of interstate commerce unless a registration statement has been filed with the SEC or an exemption from registration applies.
The registration statement must contain detailed information about the securities being offered, the company, and its management, among other things.
By requiring securities to be registered with the SEC, the Securities Act of 1933 aims to ensure that investors have access to complete and accurate information about the securities they are considering purchasing. This promotes transparency and helps prevent fraudulent or misleading practices in the securities market.
To know more about Securities Act refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31227421
#SPJ11
The model of criminal justice that is focused on protecting defendants’ rights is known as the ______ model.
Answer:
the due process model
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:process
Explanation:
a separate legal system for juveniles was established during the _________ period. a. juvenile court b. crime control c. refuge d. juvenile rights
During the "juvenile court" era, a distinct judicial system for children was created.
Concerns regarding how to treat juvenile offenders' needs differently from adult criminals led to the creation of the juvenile court system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Instead than focusing on punishment, The establishment of the juvenile court system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries emerged from concerns about addressing the distinct needs of juvenile offenders compared to adult criminals. Rather than emphasizing punishment, the primary goal of the juvenile court system was to focus on rehabilitation, treatment, and support for young offenders. This period marked a notable shift in perception, recognizing the unique circumstances and potential for positive transformation among juvenile offenders.
lean more about judicial system here :
https://brainly.com/question/11690442
#SPJ11
2. Research and explain the kind of economic impact imprisonment can
have on a community.
Answer:
The high imprisonment rate in the U.S can have economic impact on social society, since incarceration can have effects like obstructing employment and increase rates of poverty.
FILL THE BLANK.
federal ____________ of state law occurs when there is a literal conflict between state and federal regulations, so that it is impossible to follow both simultaneously.
Federal preemption of state law occurs when there is a literal conflict between state and federal regulations, so that it is impossible to follow both simultaneously.
Federal preemption is a legal concept that is used to address disputes between state and federal laws. It arises when state and federal laws overlap, but the federal law supersedes the state law, resulting in the invalidation of the state law.In such a scenario, federal law has more weight than state law, and it controls over the conflicting state law.
When a court determines that federal law preempts a state law, it means that the state law has been preempted, and it is no longer in effect. This means that anyone subject to the state law is no longer required to follow it; instead, they must follow the federal law. This principle is based on the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution, which provides that the Constitution and federal laws are the supreme law of the land, and that state laws are subordinate to them.
Learn more about Federal preemption here: https://brainly.com/question/28444164
#SPJ11
1. What are at least two key distinctions between a developed and a developing nation that the
table suggests? What is a key distinction between the United States and both other nations? (2
points)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
You did not give the table but here are some differences between a developed nation and a developing nation.
First and foremost, we should note that a developed country is one that is highly industrialized, has a high GDP and has a high per capital income while a developing nation is one that has low industrialization, low GDP and low per capita income.
Secondly, a developed nation typically has a low unemployment rate while a developing nation has a high unemployment rate.
Thirdly, a developed nation has a low birth rate and a low infant mortality rate while a developing nation has a high birth rate and a high infant mortality rate.
Furthermore, a developed nation has a high standard of living and good infrastructural facilities such as good road network, constant power supply etc while a developing nation has a low standard of living and poor infrastructural facilities.
Lastly, the resources of a developed nation are effectively and efficiently used while a developing nation mismanages its resources.
1.
A person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor.
Would this case be tried in a federal or state court
When a person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor, then this case would be tried in a state court.
What is a state court?A court in the US that decides issues based on state law rather than federal law stockholder class actions settled by state courts must be recognised by federal courts. State legislation protecting the rights of people with disabilities allows them to file a claim for damages in state court.
The final decision-makers for state laws and constitutions are state courts. They may appeal to the US Supreme Court over how they interpret federal law or the US Constitution. Such cases may or may not be heard by the Supreme Court.
Therefore, when any of the cases or incidents like assaulting a neighbor is filed, this case will be tried in the state court.
Learn more about state court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23041991
#SPJ2
khi li hôn quyền và nghĩa vụ giữa những người là vợ chồng cũng chấm dứt
???????????????? what
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
Explain why the federal system was just right for the new nation
Answer: a federal system was right for a new nation because it did not put one person in power but more than one in power to keep it from becoming one person making all the changes. Sorry if it didn’t make sense didn’t know how to word it.
Explanation:
is based on the idea of a society which gives individuals and groups fair treatment and a just share of the benefits of society.
The concept of a just society revolves around the notion of providing individuals and groups with equitable treatment and a fair distribution of societal benefits.
A just society is one that prioritizes fairness, equality, and justice for all its members. It seeks to eliminate discrimination, prejudice, and unfair treatment, and instead promotes an environment where everyone has equal opportunities and access to societal benefits. In a just society, individuals and groups are not subjected to discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, religion, socioeconomic status, or any other arbitrary characteristic.
Creating a just society requires addressing systemic inequalities that may exist within the social, economic, and political structures. This involves implementing policies and practices that ensure equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and privileges. It also requires promoting social welfare and providing essential services such as healthcare, education, and housing to all members of society, particularly those who are disadvantaged or marginalized.
A just society operates under the rule of law, where laws and regulations are fair, transparent, and impartially enforced. It protects the rights and freedoms of individuals, ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect. It provides mechanisms for resolving disputes and seeking redress for injustices, thereby maintaining social harmony and stability.
Creating and maintaining a just society is an ongoing process that requires collective efforts from individuals, communities, and institutions. It requires promoting awareness, fostering inclusivity, and challenging systemic barriers that hinder equality and justice. By striving towards a just society, societies can cultivate an environment where all individuals and groups have the opportunity to flourish and contribute to the overall well-being of the community.
To learn more about justice click here, brainly.com/question/32393997
#SPJ11
1) If the only solid evidence against a capital murder suspect in a trial were DNA profiles from hair taken from the crime scene and the suspect’s DNA, what chance of an "accidental match" would be small enough for you to feel that the suspect is guilty "beyond reasonable doubt?" Explain your reasoning.
2) Why are transgenic animals engineered as models of human disease, rather than studying the disease in humans?
If the only solid evidence against a capital murder suspect in a trial were DNA profiles from hair taken from the crime scene and the suspect’s DNA, the chance of an "accidental match" would have to be exceedingly low for someone to believe that the suspect is guilty "beyond reasonable doubt."
1)The DNA profiles would be compared and the match probability calculated. If the probability is greater than 1 in a billion, most forensic experts would consider the evidence to be highly probative (suggestive of guilt), while probabilities of 1 in a million or less would be considered more conclusive. DNA is a powerful tool that can help to confirm or refute a defendant's guilt, but it can also be misleading.
While the statistical probability of a particular DNA profile appearing in the general population may be quite low, the possibility of coincidental matches cannot be completely ruled out. Therefore, the chances of accidental matches would have to be incredibly low for someone to feel that the suspect is guilty "beyond reasonable doubt."
2) Transgenic animals are engineered as models of human disease rather than studying the disease in humans because of ethical concerns, as well as practical and logistical reasons. Using transgenic animals to study disease allows researchers to control and manipulate the disease-causing genes and observe the effects in a controlled environment. This can provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying the disease and potential treatments without exposing humans to unnecessary risk.
For example, researchers can study the development and progression of diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease in transgenic mice that have been engineered to develop the disease. This can provide a deeper understanding of the genetic and molecular processes underlying the disease and can lead to the identification of new drug targets and therapies.
Additionally, using transgenic animals allows researchers to study diseases that are difficult or impossible to study in humans due to ethical or logistical considerations, such as infectious diseases that are highly contagious or rare genetic disorders. Overall, using transgenic animals as models of human disease can provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying the disease and potential treatments.
To know more about genetic disorders visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9168497
#SPJ11
Bureaucrats use ____ to fill in the details of a vague law by writing and creating rules, regulations, and standards of laws passed by Congress.
Bureaucrats use administrative adjudication to fill in the details of a vague law by writing and creating rules, regulations, and standards of laws passed by Congress.
CFPB director-recommended decisions are made in administrative adjudication processes, which are formal adversarial hearings presided over by an administrative law judge. The administrative law judge's suggested decision is either adopted or modified by the director in the final decision.Both judicial and administrative tribunals now have more adaptability and flexibility thanks to administrative adjudication. In addition to being the best option for taking administrative action, administrative tribunals are also the best way to provide fair justice to individuals.To know more about Adjudication here
https://brainly.com/question/28362785
#SPJ4
Why is DNA fingerprinting used in forensics?
A. to identify the place of crime
B. to identify the evidence
C. to identify the modus operandi
D. to identify the culprit
who wrote: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” ?
What are the 7 steps of making a law?
The first step is to draft a bill. Legislation is created, sponsored, and introduced by members of the House or Senate for consideration by Congress, The second step is committee action, STEP 3: Take Action on the Floor, Vote in Step 4, Conference Committees in Step 5, Presidential action is the sixth step, The formulation of a law is Step 7.
What steps are involved in the legal system in India?Either a minister or an MLA will introduce a bill in the Legislative Assembly (or Vidhan Sabha). 2: The assembly debates and discusses the bill in great detail. Before the bill is put to a vote, MLAs may suggest changes. Additionally, a small committee may be given the task of enhancing the bill's provisions.
How do laws become passed and enacted?The same law must receive a majority vote in both the House and the Senate in order to be approved and sent to the President for signature. If a law is vetoed by the president, it can be overridden by passing it once more in each chamber including at least two-thirds of the members present voting in favor.
To know more about Bill visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11822961
#SPJ4
Prepare 2 separate diagrams: 1 for the Federal court system and 1 for the Ohio State Court system. Make sure to include the following: 1. Identify each court by its correct name 2. Identify the type of jurisdiction the court has (original- general or limited, appellatemandatory or discovery or both appellate and original) 3. The subject matter jurisdiction of each court (what type of cases does it have the authority to hear ex: Ohio Common Pleas Domestic Relations Division hears divorces/dissolutions) 4. Show how a case flows through the court system (where does it start, where does it goyou can accomplish this by using arrows)
Diagram of the Federal Court system
Federal Court System
1. The district courts, also known as trial courts.
2. The circuit courts of appeal.
3. The U.S. Supreme Court.
4. The jurisdiction of the Federal courts is limited to cases which arise under the U.S. Constitution, Federal laws, or treaties.
5. Appeals cases include a panel of three judges and the appellant loses when the majority agrees with the lower court ruling.
Diagram of the Ohio State Court system
Ohio State Court System
1. Ohio Supreme Court.
2. Court of Appeals.
3. Ohio Court of Claims.
4. Ohio Court of Common Pleas.
5. Ohio Municipal Courts.
6. Ohio County Courts.
7. Ohio Juvenile Courts.
8. The jurisdiction of the Ohio State Court system has General Jurisdiction and Limited Jurisdiction.
9. Ohio Common Pleas Domestic Relations Division hears divorces/dissolutions.
Case Flow through the Federal and Ohio State Court systems
Federal court system case flow:
1. Complaint
2. Answer
3. Discovery
4. Motion for summary judgment
5. Trial
Ohio State court system case flow:
1. File a complaint
2. Service of Process
3. Answer/ Reply to Counterclaim
4. Discovery
5. Motion for Summary Judgment
6. Pre-Trial Conference
7. Trial
Learn more about court system from:
https://brainly.com/question/30307656
#SPJ11
A cadet squad member with a question should go see the commandant right away. *
True or False
Answer: True
I am very happy to help you.
Explanation:
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
An energy transformation flow diagram is shown.
A flow diagram beginning with an X. An arrow goes from the X to a toaster oven. Another arrow goes from the toaster oven to the words Thermal Energy.
What type of energy does X most likely represent?
X = radiant energy
X = chemical energy
X = gravitational energy
X = electrical energy
Answer:
chemical
Explanation:
What is the average speed of a car that travels 150 meters in 5 seconds
Answer: 3:33
Explanation:
The union is looking to gather "authorization cards" and has requested access to you facility to talk with employees.
• What is the issue?
• How would you handle it?
You are in a "Right-to-Work" state. The union wants you to require that anyone who works in this Company be required to join the union.
• What is the issue?
• How would you handle it?
The issue is that the union is seeking authorization cards to gain access to the facility to talk to employees. An authorization card is a signed statement, in writing, that authorizes a labor union to represent the person who signs it.
The union is trying to gain access to a company with the intention of representing its employees.The union requesting access to a company to speak to its employees can lead to some concerns. The company should consider the following before granting access: the impact of unionization on company profits and productivity, the level of support for unionization among workers, and the company’s legal obligations. The company should also create an opportunity to provide employees with comprehensive information regarding unionization.
The issue here is the union's request for mandatory union membership for all employees. The concept of right-to-work is that no one can be forced to join a union. However, in a non-right-to-work state, some employers require workers to join a union as a condition of employment. The company must first determine whether it is a right-to-work state or not.If the company is in a right-to-work state, mandatory union membership is not permitted. The company should inform the union that mandatory union membership is illegal in the state. It is also essential to inform employees that joining the union is voluntary. This approach is likely to discourage union membership, thereby preventing the union from obtaining exclusive bargaining rights with the company.
To know more about Employee union visit-
brainly.com/question/19593231
#SPJ11
When two vehicles are approaching each other and signaling to turn left, both
vehicles should take the inside path, the lane closest to the center. They will complete
the turn by turning in
of each other.
Answer:
What are you asking? True or False??
a warrantless search for evanescent evidence is permissible when
A warrantless search for evanescent evidence is permissible when the evidence is likely to disappear or be destroyed before a warrant can be obtained.
Evanescent evidence is evidence that is temporary and fleeting, such as the odor of drugs or the presence of blood on a suspect's clothing. The Supreme Court has recognized the need for law enforcement to act quickly in these situations to prevent the loss of crucial evidence. However, the search must still be reasonable and based on probable cause. The officer must have a reasonable belief that the evidence will disappear before a warrant can be obtained. Additionally, the scope of the search must be limited to the area where the evidence is likely to be found. If the search exceeds these limits, any evidence obtained may be inadmissible in court. It is important to note that warrantless searches are still subject to scrutiny and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure that they meet the constitutional standards for reasonableness.
To know more about warrantless visit:
brainly.com/question/30036603
#SPJ11