Texa Peace Officer Jutice conducted a warrantle arret of defendant, Grace and charged him with the offene of Aggravated Robbery. Defendant Grace wa tranported in a police unit to the police department. After hi Miranda right were read, but prior to hi tatement, Grace aked the officer that he wa thinking about requeting an attorney. The interview continued and Grace provided a tatement implicating himelf in the robbery. The next morning, Grace wa taking before a magitrate. At hi trial, Grace’ attorney file a Motion to Suppre Statement given by Grace. Dicu the factual and legal iue that will have to be addreed by the Court in deciding whether the tatement will be admiible
Answers
Aggravated robbery is a First Degree Felony in Texas, and it carries a maximum punishment of life in prison even for first-time offenders.
This kind of charge is exceedingly detrimental to your long-term criminal record, even if you avoid a lengthy prison term. In these circumstances, your defense cannot be passive.
Armed robbery is a felony offense in several places, although it is classified as aggravated robbery in Texas. When someone tries to steal something (commit theft) and threatens or injures someone in the process, the behavior is referred to as "robbery." If the robber is armed or in possession of a lethal weapon, it becomes "aggravated".
To know more about Aggravated robbery :
https://brainly.com/question/10439349
#SPJ4
Related Questions
if ramona changes her will at age 88 to leave the bulk of her fortune to her home health care nurse instead of her children, what factor will the courts consider in judging whether or not her will is valid?
Answers
The factor that will be considered by the courts in judging whether or not her will is valid is undue influence.
Undue influence is excessive persuasion performed on someone that causes that someone to act (or refrain from doing a certain act) by overcoming that someone's free will. There are several things that much be considered before determining whether a result was produced by undue influence or not:
The influencer's authority over the victim.Victim's vulnerability.The tactics used by the influencer (intimidation, control, or other actions).In the case above, the courts must determine first whether Ramona's health care nurse is performing undue influence over Ramona before ruling.
Learn more about undue influence at https://brainly.com/question/14363378
#SPJ4
One of the major strengths of the 1964 civil rights act was to give the federal government the authority to initiate enforcement of court orders or civil rights legislation, rather than wait for a claim to be brought by affected individuals or groups.
Answers
A major strength that came with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that the Federal government did not need a claim to be brought to enforce civil rights legislation so this is True.
What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 do?It made it a federal crime to discriminate against people based on demographic factors such as color, race and religion.
Because such discrimination became a federal crime, the federal government now had to right to enforce civil rights legislation without people bringing claims because they were simply enforcing the law.
Find out more on the Civil Rights Act at https://brainly.com/question/1261890.
A person is charged with robbing $10,000 from a jewelry store. Match the probation officer and the parole officer to their specific tasks of this case.
Answers
Answer:
Parole officer: speaks to judges
probation officer: makes a plan
probation officer: monitors
Parole officer: acts carefully
Explanation:
I hope it is correct!
Answer:the pic below
Explanation:On edge
When there is more than one judge, the group of judges is called
Answers
Answer:
Appellate :)
Explanation:
Answer:
in think the answer is panel
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answers
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
The Bureau of Consumer Protection is one part of the Federal Trade Commission. How do regulatory agencies like these impact consumers? How do they affect businesses?
Any incorrect or silly answers will not be accepted, this isn't a joke
Answers
Answer: The bureau of consumer protection is an organization that protects the rights of consumers.
Explanation:
The bureau of consumer protection collects complaints from consumers. It conducts investigations on the sale and purchase of goods or services and fraudulent and unfair business practices.
The bureau of consumer protection is a regulatory agency, which develops the rules to maintain the fair marketplace by educating the consumers. The unethical business practices in which consumers are being cheated are sued by the bureau.
True or false. To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and sign ig.
Answers
To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False
When something needs to be notarized, what does it mean?A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.
What is a certificate from a notary?A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.
What is a notarized stamp?When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.
Learn more about notarizing document :
brainly.com/question/14477099
#SPJ1
In his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for linda brown claimed that "separate but equal" public schools were separate but not truly equal. neither equal nor separate. equal but not truly separate. both separate and equal.
Answers
In Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for the prosecution by Linda Brown argued that public schools were separate but not truly equal.
What was argued in Brown v. Board of Education?The prosecution argued that even though the American public school system was separate, it was not equal.
This was because White Only schools got more resources which allowed their students to be more successful.
Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at https://brainly.com/question/9857823.
#SPJ4
Answer:
separate but not truly equal.
Explanation:
Banking Problems. Constance and Blair are both loan officers at ABC Bank. Constance, being somewhat dishonest, tells Henry, a customer of the bank who is wealthy and rarely checks the status of outstanding loans and balances, that she is collecting money for a local animal shelter. She asks him to sign a pledge that he will contribute $50 to the animal shelter. In fact, she had him sign a promissory note made out to her for $5,000, which she later endorsed to Richard. Henry proceeds back to one of his businesses, a used car dealership. Taylor comes in to purchase a used car. He and Henry agree that Taylor will purchase a used car for $3,000. Martha also comes in, and she and Henry agree that she will purchase a used car for $4,000. Both Taylor and Martha make out promissory notes payable to Henry. At the end of the day, Henry is looking through the notes and decides that Taylor's was mistakenly made out for $3,000. Henry mistakenly, but honestly, believed that the deal was for $3,500. Therefore, he changes the note to reflect that Taylor owed $3,500. Henry, on the other hand, simply did not like Martha. He decided that $4,000 was not enough for the car. Accordingly, he changed the note to $4,500. Which of the following is true regarding Martha's liability to Henry?
a. He will be liable because an official banking document was involved. 0 O He can claim fraud in the inducement
b. He will be liable without further inquiry unless he can establish that the note had not been endorsed to a holder in due course.
c. He can claim fraud in the factum, and whether he is liable or not will depend upon whether a court determines that he should have known what he was signing
d. He will not be liable, because a party is never liable when the party signed a negotiable instrument without knowing that it is, in fact, a negotiable instrument
Answers
Answer:C
Explanation:
Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that the Martha's personal liability to Henry will be such that he can claim fraud in the factum, and whether he is liable or not will depend upon whether a court determines that he should have known what he was signing. Therefore, the option C holds true.
What is the significance of personal liability?Personal liability can be referred to or considered as the liability that has to be borne by the person in his or her individual capacity. For example, a sole proprietorship has personal liability, wherein the owner of the business is liable for all the losses in an organization, if any.
For the above situation, Martha will be decided by law is he is personally liable towards Henry. This is because he is given the protection to claim fraud in the factum, and the liability of Martha will be determined by the verdict or the decision given by a court of law in this regard.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of personal liability.
Learn more about personal liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/28222036
#SPJ5
The document submitted to the payer requesting reimbursement is called a(n)
a. explanation of benefits.
b. health insurance claim.
c. remittance advice.
d. prior approval form.
Answers
The document submitted to the payer requesting reimbursement is called a health insurance claim.
A corporation and a customer enter into a contract for health insurance. In exchange for the payment of a monthly premium, the corporation offers to cover all or part of the insured person's medical expenses. The contract, which is typically for a year, outlines the precise costs linked to disease, injury, pregnancy, or preventative treatment that the insurance would be liable for covering. In the United States, health insurance contracts typically contain exclusions from coverage, such as: A deductible that requires the customer to pay certain healthcare expenses "out-of-pocket" up to a specified amount before the business coverage begins one or more co-payments that demand the customer to cover a predetermined portion of the price of particular services or treatments
To know more health insurance claim
https://brainly.com/question/30325486
#SPJ11
Common law is never as easy as we may like because the law is trying to accommodate both a. understandability and predictability. b. predictability and flexibility. c. intent and reason. d. flexibility and precedent.
Answers
Common law is not that easy because this type of law is trying to accommodate predictability and flexibility.
The answer to this question is option B.What is common law?
Common law can be defined as the laws that are based on precedents. These laws are unwritten laws and are also referred to as jurisprudence.
Read more on common laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
if a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, then firms with valuable technologies will be reluctant to bring them into that country. t/f
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, firms with valuable technologies may be reluctant to bring them into that country. Without strong intellectual property protections, the firms' technologies and innovations may be vulnerable to theft or copying, which could undermine the firms' ability to profit from their investments in research and development. This could discourage the firms from investing in the country, or lead them to invest less in research and development. Strong intellectual property rights protections are therefore an important factor in encouraging innovation and economic growth.
An agency is part of the _______________ branch of government and has the power to ____________.
a. executive branch; create and implement laws
b. legislative branch; create and adjudicate laws
c. legislative branch; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws
d. executive; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws
Answers
An agency is part of the ______legislative branch_________ branch of government and has the power to ___create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws_________. The correct answer is: option (C) legislative branch; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws.
adjudicate laws" is not a common phrase or term. However, it is possible to understand it in a general sense as the process of interpreting and applying laws in order to resolve legal disputes or determine their validity. Adjudication typically involves the following steps:
Legal Disputes: Adjudication comes into play when there is a legal dispute between parties. This could involve civil matters, criminal offenses, or administrative issues.
Court Proceedings: The dispute is brought before a court or a judicial body where the parties present their arguments, evidence, and legal reasoning. This can include witness testimonies, expert opinions, and relevant documents.
Interpretation of Laws: The judge or adjudicator analyzes the applicable laws, statutes, regulations, and precedents relevant to the case. They interpret and apply these legal provisions to the facts and arguments presented.
Legal Reasoning: The judge engages in legal reasoning to analyze the facts, arguments, and legal principles in order to arrive at a fair and just decisions.
learn more about adjudicate laws here :
https://brainly.com/question/30501031
#SPJ11
State constitutions also establish their own procedures for amending their state constitutions.
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The special Constitution alteration procedures used by States are: a State-wide referendum, special majorities in the Parliament. an absolute majority (or, in other words, a majority of the total number of the members of the House concerned: a two/thirds majority, or a combination of the two.
the type of justice that seeks to achieve the greatest good for all is called
Answers
Utilitarian justice is a type of justice that aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Utilitarian justice is a consequentialist approach to justice that focuses on the outcome or consequences of a particular action or decision. It measures the success of a decision by its ability to produce the greatest happiness or benefit for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian justice considers the overall well-being of society and seeks to maximize overall happiness and minimize suffering. It is often used in discussions surrounding public policy and ethical dilemmas, where decisions must be made that affect a large number of people.
Learn more about Utilitarian justice: https://brainly.com/question/29809673
#SPJ11
The process by which individuals acquire their opinions is called
a. popular culture.
b. social communication.
c. socio-economic change.
d. political socialization.
Answers
Political socialization is the process by which individuals develop their political attitudes, values, beliefs, and behaviors. It is a lifelong process that begins in childhood and continues throughout adulthood.
There are several agents of political socialization, including family, school, peers, the media, and political institutions. Family is considered to be the most important agent of political socialization because it is the primary source of political attitudes and values for most individuals. School, peers, and the media also play important roles in shaping political beliefs and attitudes. Political institutions, such as political parties and interest groups, also contribute to political socialization by providing individuals with opportunities to participate in the political process and engage with others who share their political views.
To know more about socialization click here:
brainly.com/question/16301711
#SPJ4
which is the usually the least costly adr process? a. arbitration b. jury trial c. mediation d. negotation
Answers
The least costly ADR process is usually negotiation (option D).
ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a term used to describe various methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional court litigation. These methods can be less expensive, less time-consuming, and less adversarial than going to court.
Negotiation is one form of ADR, which involves the parties in a dispute coming together to discuss and reach a mutually agreeable solution.
Negotiation can occur informally, with the parties discussing the matter directly, or it can occur with the assistance of a third party, such as a mediator.
In terms of cost, negotiation is often the least expensive form of ADR. This is because it typically does not involve hiring a third-party neutral or other professionals to assist in the process. Instead, the parties themselves can come to the table to negotiate and resolve the dispute.
Negotiation can be a cost-effective method for resolving disputes in a variety of situations. For example, it can be used to settle employment disputes, business disputes, and even family disputes. It can also be used in conjunction with other ADR methods, such as mediation or arbitration.
However, it is important to note that while negotiation may be the least costly form of ADR, it may not always be the most effective method for resolving a dispute.
In some cases, parties may be unable to reach an agreement through negotiation alone, and may need to turn to other forms of ADR or even litigation.
Overall, while negotiation may be the least costly ADR process, it is important to consider all available options and choose the method that is most appropriate for the particular dispute at hand.
To learn more about negotiation, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/28461798
#SPJ11
Which U.S. foreign policy goal does this scenario support?
The president of the United States sends an executive official to Taiwan to discuss its relations with China.
A. World peace
B. Spread of democracy
C. Humanitarian help
D. National security
Answers
The scenario described supports the U.S. foreign policy goal of Option D. national security.
By sending an executive official to Taiwan to discuss its relations with China, the United States is taking a proactive approach to safeguard its national security interests.
Taiwan is a strategically important region in East Asia, and its relationship with China is a critical factor in the overall stability of the region. China considers Taiwan as a part of its territory and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve reunification. The United States, on the other hand, has long been committed to ensuring the security and stability of Taiwan, as it is a key ally in the region.
By engaging in discussions with Taiwan regarding its relations with China, the United States is signaling its commitment to maintaining a strong presence in the Asia-Pacific region and protecting its national security interests. This engagement can involve military cooperation, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic support for Taiwan's international recognition.
Overall, this scenario aligns with the U.S. foreign policy goal of national security, as it reflects the United States' efforts to protect its interests and maintain stability in a region of strategic importance. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about national security here:
https://brainly.com/question/31226718
#SPJ8
Answer:
A. World peace
Explanation:
Treble damages are awarded to a private plaintiff for antitrust violations and are assessed as a multiplier of three to which type of damages?.
Answers
Some statutes allow for an award of treble damages only if there is a showing that the violation was willful.
Treble damages refers to a legal provision that allows a successful plaintiff to receive up to three times the amount of real or compensatory damages. The False Claims Act, for instance, enables the US government to seek treble damages from defense contractors that intentionally file false claims in an effort to defraud the government.
In some cases, treble damages are multiplied by actual damages rather than being added to them. However, they are occasionally additive, as in California Civil Code Section 1719. When such damages are multiplicative, a court using treble damages would increase a judgment of $100 for an injury to $300.
Learn more about treble here:
https://brainly.com/question/521026
#SPJ4
What did the system of the amendments do for the Constitution? Choose all that apply.
It gave states the opportunities to show disagreement with federal law.
It gave the states the right to apply or not apply the Bill of Rights.
It allows for updating with time and issues, but it does not change the original document.
It allowed for civil rights to be applied through the Bill of Rights.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is b and c
Explanation:
Just took the test
Which of the following is NOT a reason for the origins of government?
A. Defend private property
B. Protect people from conflict
C. Provide law and order
D. Collect tax revenues
Answers
Answer:
D. Collect tax revenues
Explanation:
The reasons for the origins of government derives most probably from the requirement of protecting people from conflicts which may arise as people interact within each other or with peoples in other locations and to provide law and order among people living together so as to prevent internal conflicts due to selfishness and greed over privileges and property. Therefore, governments are meant to protect private property according to Karl Marx people are greedy and selfish because of property
The collection of tax revenues arise to finance already established governments and is therefore NOT a reason for the origins of government.
Answer:
D. Collect tax revenues
Explanation:
how many amendments does the texas constitution have
Answers
Answer:
As of 2022 (the 87th Legislature), the Texas Legislature has proposed a total of 700 amendments. Of these, 517 have been adopted, and 180 have been defeated by Texas voters, and three amendments never made it to the ballot. Thus, the Texas Constitution has been amended 517 times since its adoption in 1876.
Kira forges Lew’s name as the drawer of a stolen check, drawn on Metro Bank, and makes the item payable to Kira. Lew is liable to pay the amount to
a.
no one.
b.
ordinary holders only.
c.
HDCs only.
d.
ordinary holders, HDCs, and holders through HDCs.
Answers
Lew has been liable to reimburse the amount to the holder due in course, it related parties and the actual holders of the check.
Option D is correct.
Who is a drawer?A drawer is referring to person who has created a check in the name of another person or any financial institution like banks.
According to the situation, the drawer of the stolen check is found to be Lew due to forged name put up by Kira. This shows that Lew is now become obligated towards all the parties in connection with the payment of amount being stated in the check.
Therefore, the ordinary holders, Holder due in course and its related parties are beneficial to be get reimbursed by Lew.
Learn more about the bank checks in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/9892102
#SPJ2
Question 1 of 10
Which is the term for concepts in a study, such as the average age of a
person upon acquiring his or her first job and the average salary he or she
was paid for that job?
O A. Results
B. Predictions
O C. Variables
D. Outcomes
Answers
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
herbert packer likened the idealized criminal justice system to a(n) _________
Answers
The statement is completed as: ''Herbert Packer likened the idealized criminal justice system to an assembly line.''
Packer's theory of the criminal justice system, known as the "crime control model," posits that the primary function of the criminal justice system is to control crime through the efficient and expedient processing of cases.
In Packer's assembly line model, criminal cases move through the various stages of the justice system, from arrest to trial to sentencing, in a predictable and efficient manner. The focus is on the speedy disposition of cases, with an emphasis on conviction and punishment rather than due process rights for the accused.
Packer's model contrasts with the "due process model," which emphasizes the protection of individual rights and liberties, and views the criminal justice system as a safeguard against governmental abuse of power. The due process model values fairness, impartiality, and the presumption of innocence, and seeks to ensure that defendants are treated justly throughout the criminal justice process.
While Packer's assembly line model has been criticized for its lack of attention to due process concerns and individual rights, it remains a useful conceptual framework for understanding the criminal justice system and the various tensions and tradeoffs involved in balancing the competing goals of crime control and due process.
See more about criminal justice system at https://brainly.com/question/30647496.
#SPJ11
Explaining the job of the specialization of wild land firefighting that you have chosen make sure you cite sources
Answers
Answer:
u protect the wild
Explanation:
u protect the wild from fire done
this is why people gave E d g e n u i t y a 1 star rating
Answers
Answer:
well dang
have a good day :)
Explanation:
all laws are framed to meet the highest ethical standards T/F
Answers
All laws are formulated to satisfy the highest ethical standards. This statement is False.
Laws are not only made to frame to meet the highest ethical standards in each and every case. They are made for the goal of establishing a framework of justice and defending the basic rights of persons within a specified society but they can vary across different countries.
The creation and implementation of laws is in the hands of government which involves intricate concerns. Sometimes these laws go beyond ethics and they can be affected by other factors like political power, society, and historical context and they might be controversial.
To learn more about ethical standards
https://brainly.com/question/17774751
#SPJ4