Answer:
violence (or abuse) is involved?
stalking isnt really a federal crime since there is no violence involved. unless there is and that would count as a federal crime.
source(s)
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ovw/172204.pdf
Based on your reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, what is the best summary statement of the issue?
Private security services have grown in number, profitability and importance over the past decade. The 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. robbed many Americans of a sense of security and, as a result, a market was created for private security services that reintroduced a sense of safety and well-being. Traditionally, communities looked to their local police department to provide the appropriate level of security and safety. Those communities lacking the financial resources to increase significantly the number of police officers regularly patrolling the streets turned to private security contractors to fill the gap between the current strength of the police department and the level of security the community identified as necessary and appropriate. The result has been the creation of a number of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms. While there are a number of factors that distinguish the sworn law enforcement officer from his or her private security counterpart, none is more significant than their respective obligations to uphold the provisions of the Constitution. If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether these citizen police share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Responses
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the Constitution, the federal government, the states’ law enforcement and city forces have authority to request assistance from private security whose training allows them to act as police in national disasters.
Based on the reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, the best summary statement of the issue is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
The passage describes the growing importance of private security services after the 9/11 terror attacks, which created a market for private security services to reintroduce a sense of safety and well-being.
Private security contractors have been employed by communities lacking financial resources to increase the number of police officers patrolling the streets, leading to the creation of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms.
The passage highlights the significance of the obligations of the sworn law enforcement officer and the private security personnel in upholding the provisions of the Constitution.
If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Hence, the correct answer is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
For more question on police departments
https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ8
A body is found on the concrete floor of an abandoned petroleum
manufacturing building lying face-up among wooden boxes and cans.
Upon arrival, body temperature was measured to be 76.2° F. Livor
mortis was found along the back and backs of the legs. When
pressed, the areas of lividity remained dark. Visible marks were found
as follows: severe purple bruising around the eyes. No other wounds
or marks were found. The body was found to have rigor mortis
throughout the entire body. The toxicology technician discovered
alcohol in the decedent's system consistent with approximately five
alcoholic beverages.
From all indications, the possible cause of death is intentional impact and possible sui.cide. See information related to autopsy below.
What are the reasons for the above?The body's toxicity was measured and form all indications the deceased premedicated their own death.
The deceased intentionally got dru.nk enough to take no thoughts about taking their own life. The bruises on the body are likely from impact to the concrete floor.
What is the likely manner of death?The likely manner of death was suic.ide by falling from a very dangerous height.
In this case who would order the autopsy?The family of the deceased, if there are any would be the ones to order an autopsy. In the event that the deceased has no relations, the state would order one.
In this case who would sign the certificate of death?State laws often mandate that a medical examiner or coroner complete the death certificate in cases of suspected suic.ide or homic.ide. The likelihood of sui.cide may be understated by 10% to 50% because it is particularly susceptible to error in measurement.
Learn more about autopsy:
https://brainly.com/question/12363103
#SPJ1
When accused of a Felony, the accused has the right to a Grand Jury hearing according to the
What was the basic premise of the claim by Mike's Train
House (MTH) against Lionel that involved
trade secrets?
At first what did the Bill of rights apply to, as a result the Court could do what?
Mr. Peters has a legal handgun to protect his home against intruders and against the increasing crime in his neighborhood. One night, Takeshi, a 16 year old Japanese exchange student, walks up Mr. Peters’ driveway looking for a party. Takeshi thinks Mr. Peters is hosting the party and begins yelling and waving his arms. Mr. Peters gets scared, retrieves his handgun, and points it at Takeshi while yelling “Freeze!” Takeshi does not understand English and keeps walking toward Mr. Peters. Thinking he is an intruder, Mr. Peters shoots and kills Takeshi at the front steps of his house. Mr. Peters is charged with first-degree muder. Does he have a defense?
Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.
A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.
Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.
In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.
Explanation:
How do avidar’s values and approaches to humans resources management support Lob’s business success?
Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management
1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.
2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.
3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.
4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.
By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.
Know more about Human resources management here:
https://brainly.com/question/14419086
#SPJ8
Jim was driving home one night after his basketball game when an officer pulled him over. The officer looked long and hard inside his car, then asked if Jim would open up his trunk. Jim said, “Do you have a warrant?” and the officer said, “no.” Because of this, Jim told that officer that he would feel more comfortable if he did not search his trunk. Was Jim correct? Why or why not?
Answer:
yes because officers must have warrants and probable cause to search you or or belongings not only that but you have a right to privacy
Explanation:
Brainliest!! How has the American model of democracy affected the cause of civil rights around the world? (Please make an Introduction and a Conclusion)
Answer:
Explanation: The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives. Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.
Answer:
Explanation: The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives. Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.
Explanation:
Imagine a case where a defendant is accused of a serious crime and is facing a potential life sentence. However, during the trial, it is discovered that the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence that could have exonerated the defendant. This evidence was not disclosed to the defense due to an oversight by the prosecution team.
Question: What is the solution to the issue of the prosecution withholding exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial, potentially denying the defendant a fair trial and leading to a wrongful conviction?
WARNING: don't put a troll answer or I'll report
Answer:
Brainlest Please!
Explanation:
The solution to the issue of the prosecution withholding exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial is for the court to grant a new trial or to vacate the conviction, depending on the severity of the misconduct and the impact it had on the outcome of the trial. The defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial includes the right to all exculpatory evidence that could affect the outcome of the trial. If the prosecution fails to disclose such evidence, it constitutes a violation of due process, and the court must take appropriate action to remedy the situation. Additionally, the prosecution team may face disciplinary action or even criminal charges for their misconduct.
List three (3) occasions of sin and how to avoid temptation to sin in each occasion you listed.
Answer:
scenario 1: disrespectful behavior towards your parents. anything from arguing back and forth with them and/or involving yourself in anything your parents instructed you not to
how to avoid: Jesus makes it clear that even when we move out, our responsibilities to our parents continue. Honoring your mother and father can look like any of these things; taking good care of them, being submissive and obedient to them, speaking well of them and seeking their wisdom
scenario 2: using profanity and blaspheming God's name. An example would be “O Jesus, that scared the life out of me” or "OMG"
how to avoid: the Bible in general, and the book of James in particular (James 3:1ff), warns about the improper use of the tongue. So instead of cursing, speak positive and encouraging words. The apostle Paul says, “Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person” (Colossians 4:6, ESV)
scenario 3: watching inappropriate content or inappropriate scenes in a tv show or movie
how to avoid: Nearly 40 million Americans are regular visitors to inappropriate sites. The average visit lasts 6 minutes and 29 seconds with 55% of married men and 25% of married women say that they watch inappropriate videos at least once a month. 11 is the average age a child is first exposed to inappropriate videos and images, and 94% of children will see it by the age of 14. The first step is to confess your sins. The second is accountability, possibly counseling, and restoration of any relationships that may have been damaged, and then take practical steps to reduce your exposure to graphic images, day by day dying to your flesh by denying yourself
Explanation: i'd like to add that there is salvation in no other name than Jesus the Christ;
"At one point in Jesus’ ministry, many of the crowd were turning their backs on Him and leaving in hopes of finding another savior. Jesus asked the Twelve, “Do you want to go away as well?” (John 6:67, ESV). Peter’s reply is exactly right: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we have believed, and have come to know, that you are the Holy One of God” (John 6:68–69, ESV). May we all share Peter’s faith that eternal life resides only in Jesus Christ."
Which department should Jake wait for in the given scenario?
Jake, a firefighter, has arrived at the site of an emergency as a part of a team. He is busy controlling the traffic near the area. He plans to
continue doing so until a law enforcement officer or someone from the Department of ____
arrives.
The first major difference between public and private safety providers has to do with who they:
hire.
host.
serve.
pay.
Answer:
Serve
Explanation:
Tell me if I got it wrong pls:)
Who decides whether a suspect will be tried for an alleged crime?
The law enforcement officer who arrested the suspect
The victim of the crime
The prosecutor
The judge
Will give brainliest
What are two major options for paying for a new car?
Answer:
Explanation: You have two financing options: direct lending or dealership financing.
Direct lending means you're borrowing money from a bank, finance company, or credit union. ...
Dealership financing means you're applying for financing through the dealership. ...
Shop for the Best Financing Deal.
the governor appoints someone to the FREC then the Senate rejects the appointment, what happens next?
Through its advice and consent clause, the Appointments Clause grants the President the authority to propose candidates and grants the Senate full authority to accept or reject a nomination.
What happens once the governor names someone to the FREC and the Senate rejects that appointment?
The president appoints the governor of a state, who holds office for a five-year period at his discretion. The only people who may be appointed to this post are Indian citizens who are at least 35 years old. The Governor is vested with the power to serve as the state's executive.
appointment of governors A warrant designating the governor of a state must be signed and sealed by the President. Paragraph 156. Term of office for the governor: While the President is in office, the Governor will continue to function.
A power of appointment is an idea that has its roots in British common law. It is the ability under law to give another person ownership of a deceased person's property.
Learn more about appointment process:
https://brainly.com/question/29545676
#SPJ1
what happens it a state court disagrees with a federal court?
Answer:
Then the federal court can review the decision based on the complaint/disagreement.
Explanation:
Summary and conclusion of computer forensic
what does bicyclist sign mean in a road construction?
Answer:
In explanation
Explanation:
It means watch out for bicyclist and steer clear of the bicycle lane.
Hope this helped, and please mark as Brainliest :)
A well known member of a gang is on trial for sellings hard drugs on the street. The
prosecutor insists that he take the stand and tell everything he knows about the crimes
he was involved in. Is this OK? Why or why why not? Explain your response by
citing an amendment.
Answer:
well it isn't ok to sell drugs but he probably was providing for his family or trying to stay alive but he did a wrong thing because selling drugs is illegal and against the law
Which Enlightenment principle most influenced the ideas in this excerpt?
Answer:
what excerpt???????????
Answer:
representative government
Explanation:
What makes fingerprints individual and unique? How do scientists match a fingerprint to a specific person?
Answer:
your finger prints are unique that means no one in the world have the same ridges and lines that you have on your fingers
Explanation:
as the fetus moves there fingers rubs against the womb these tiny forces pushed the skin as it grows
Answer:
Fingerprints are unique because of ridge characteristics. These consist of ridge endings, enclosures, and other details. Fingerprints are useful in criminal investigations because of the very low probability that two different individuals could have left identical fingerprints. The FBI has databases that can compare millions of fingerprints and the advances in technology now allow investigators to digitize fingerprints. Using scanning techniques and sophisticated matching algorithms, investigators search through millions of records with lightning speed to find the perfect fingerprint match.
what does the reasonable person standard impose on a person in a negligence lawsuit?
Answer:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action
Explanation:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action. It is a standard created to provide courts and juries with an objective test that can be used in deciding whether a person's actions constitute negligence.
Which of the following explains why government would provide a good or service?
A) The Supreme Court ruled that they must
B) Certain things cannot be provided efficiently by the private sector
C) The public votes for certain things to be provided by the government
D) Specific government programs are listed in the Constitution
Explanation:
In my opinion I would say either B or D but personally I would go with B but i could be wrong so take it with a grain of salt
The following explains why the government would provide a good or service: Certain things cannot be provided efficiently by the private sector. The correct option is b.
What is a private sector?The private sector is the part of the economy, sometimes referred to as the citizen sector, which is owned by private groups, usually as a means of establishment for profit or non profit, rather than being owned by the government.
The private sector employs most of the workforce in some countries. In private sector, activities are guided by the motive to earn money. A 2013 study by the International Finance Corporation part of the World Bank Group identified that 90 percent of jobs in developing countries are in the private sector.
In free enterprise countries, such as the United States, the private sector is wider, and the state places fewer constraints on firms. In countries with more government authority, such as China, the public sector makes up most of the economy.
Learn more about private sector, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27883481
#SPJ3
Gumball says...
"Uh, if the food enters your body and exits it while it's still in the supermarket, it's technically not stealing."
Is he correct or not? Explain why?
It is untrue to say that if food enters your body and then leaves it while it is still in the store, it is not technically theft.
What is stealing or theft?In order to deprive the legitimate owner of something, theft is the act of taking another person's goods or services without that person's knowledge or agreement.
For several crimes against property, including larceny, burglary, embezzlement, extort, blackmail, or receiving stolen items, the word "theft" is also used as a synonym or informal shorthand.
While theft is defined broadly in some countries, larceny is regarded to be synonymous with stealing in others. The term "thief" can refer to a person who commits an act of theft.
Learn more about stealing or theft, from:
brainly.com/question/14896762
#SPJ1
Alfred is a defense attorney. He is trying to prepare a strong case for his client, Jeffrey, who has been accused of several crimes. These crimes include trespassing, robbery, battery and assault, and arson. Alfred wants to request the prosecution to take Jeffrey to trial on one crime at a time. Which pretrial motion should Alfred file?
Answer: Motion for severance of charges
what should a reporter do when she has a story that will make her famous but hurt an innocent person?
Answer:
The reporter should never discourage or make someone else suffer for glory.
Explanation:
They should be confident and have excellence in their knowledge of how to share news without damaging a family, person or animal in any way. There is no success in breaking someone's good influence or behaviour by tearing them down for absolutely no reason. So I would have to say just think before you speak and think "Is this really necessary or something that will have a good impact on me\someone else?
County and city governments have no direct control over this part
of their budget, as it is a requirement of law.
The part of the budget that county and city governments have no direct control over as it is a requirement of law is: the debt service.
What is debt service?The repayment of the principal and interest on any loans or outstanding obligations that the government has undertaken is referred to as debt service. These debts are frequently issued to fund capital investments like public buildings or infrastructure projects.
Therefore, county and municipal governments are required by law to set aside a specific amount of their budget for debt service payments, and they have little leeway to change or lower those payments.
Learn more about debt service here:https://brainly.com/question/31325359
#SPJ1
What are the pros and cons of juvenile life without parole ? (List two pros/cons)
Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors will form an initial opinion about whether or not the defendant is innocent or guilty from the first time they see the defendant. Jordan believes that initial impression can have a negative impact on the outcome of the case and plans to take that angle in the story he will be writing for the newspaper.
To help Jordan determine if his theory is correct, you’ve decided to attend the trial with him and take on the role of a juror. You are determined to maintain an open mind and not form an initial impression of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
Answer:
yes I think that's how it should be,for me Jordan's theory is correct
The theory regarding the first impression of a defendant during a trial matter a lot during the entire trials in the eyes of a juror relating to innocence or guilt in the minds of a defendant, and may impact the decision of the trial.
What is the significance of a defendant?A defendant to a trial can be referred to or considered as such a person against whom the trial is being held in the court of law, and such person is in a legal battle against the plaintiff of the trial. It is true that any defendant is assumed innocent until his or guilty mind has been proven.
However, there are a number of factors that can affect the image of a defendant in the eyes of a juror, just as shown in case of Jordan above. It is still necessary for a juror to keep an open mind while making a decision in the court of law.
Therefore, the significance of a defendant has been aforementioned as per the theory of Jordan.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/15025671
#SPJ2