Answers
Sometimes people are angry for various reasons.
People can be angry for a multitude of reasons, such as feeling frustrated, experiencing a perceived injustice, or facing obstacles to their desires or goals. Anger can arise from personal, interpersonal, or societal factors, and it serves as an emotional response to express dissatisfaction or assert boundaries.
To learn more about anger, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3545347?referrer=searchResults
~~~Harsha~~~
Related Questions
List two requirements to become a state supreme court judge, then describe two important traits you think a judge should possess. Explain your reasoning behind the two traits.
Answers
Answer:
Use any two requirements after changing them to point form:
A Supreme Court judge must be at least 30 years old, licensed to practice law, and a qualified voter of the state for nine years preceding selection.
Two important traits a judge should possess:
Patience
Fairness
Explanation:
Fairness is important to gain other people's respect and trust in you that you are good at your job.
Patience is important to deal with certain situations like when you might have to be at the court house all day long, or when you have to deal with rude or impatient or unreasonable people.
Answer:
Use any two requirements after changing them to point form:
A Supreme Court judge must be at least 30 years old, licensed to practice law, and a qualified voter of the state for nine years preceding selection.
Explanation:
the other guy put this down and I got a 100 so thanks to the other dude
Diputado de representación proporcional?
Answers
Explanation:
Proportional Representation Deputy?
.What is the difference between a case on point and a case on “all fours”? Why is finding either of these important when researching case law?
Answers
Answer: if you put your mom in your room how many of your dads would come back 8
Explanation:
How does the judicial branch examine the actions of administrative agencies?
Answers
Answer:
Federal courts routinely uphold very broad delegations of authority. When reviewing administrative agency actions, courts ask whether the agency afforded those under its jurisdiction due process of law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Does this help?
how did the war on drugs affect the rate of incarceration?
Answers
The war on drugs is an expression that refers to a government effort to prohibit and remove drug use, distribution, and production within their borders. The United States is a prime example of a country that has experienced the negative effects of the war on drugs, particularly in terms of incarceration rates.
The war on drugs has had a substantial impact on incarceration rates in the United States. From the early 1980s until today, the number of individuals incarcerated in the United States has increased dramatically. Over the last few decades, the United States has seen a 500% increase in the number of people incarcerated, with the largest driver of this increase being the war on drugs.There are numerous reasons why the war on drugs has resulted in increased incarceration rates. The introduction of mandatory minimum sentencing rules, for example, means that anyone found guilty of drug offenses must spend a certain amount of time in prison, irrespective of their criminal background or the severity of the offense. Additionally, more minor drug offenses, such as possession, have resulted in lengthy prison sentences, which has resulted in the overburdening of prisons.
to know about incarceration rates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32157619
#SPJ11
the part of the constitution that describes the legislative branch is?
Answers
Answer:
Article One of the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
In the United States constitution is marks the Legislative branch of the Government which consist a bicameral branch of the Government, the Upper level the Senate, and the Lower Level the House of Representatives, it also establishes the speaker role, who heads the senate, and the qualifications of someone to take a particular legislative office.
Organizational ethics can be thought of as: A. Descriptions of how ethics occurs at a companyB. Principles and standards of behavior that guide business decisionsC. Rules of conduct that establish legal requirements for businessesD. Standards of reporting ethical violations
Answers
Principles and standards of conduct that direct company decisions are what is meant by organisational ethics.
What is Organizational ethics?The ideals, principles, and standards that direct the actions of individuals and groups inside an organisation are referred to as organisational ethics, or business ethics. Corporate ethics are designed to direct and control activities and corporate circumstances so that detrimental behaviour is proactively avoided. Treatment of all employees equally is one illustration of organisational ethics. All employees, regardless of their ethnicity, religion, culture, or way of life, should be treated with respect by small business owners. Equal opportunities for advancement should be provided to everyone. Individual, organisational, and macro (such as industrial, societal, and international) levels can all be used to investigate ethical and moral concerns in business.To learn more about Organizational ethics, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13311490
Any help?
What type of cases do district courts hear and how do they rule?
Answers
now i can’t answer how they rule, sorry
Which of the following statements about alcohol consumption is CORRECT?
A)vomiting is a sign the body is getting toxic
B)vomiting at the end of a night of drinking is good
C)coffee will help sober someone up.
D) A person’s BAC will stop after he or she passed out.
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
which amendment to the u.s. constitution made slavery illegal?
Answers
Answer: 13th amendment
Explanation: This amendment abolished slavery thus making it illegal
What is classical criminology
Answers
Answer:
In criminology, the classical school usually refers to the 18th-century work during the Enlightenment by the utilitarian and social-contract philosophers Jeremy Bentham and Cesare Beccaria.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong :>
Im sure about my answer :>
If you dont mind can you please mark me as brainlest?
it's a label of series of writing from the late eighteenth early nineteenth century
What is the difference between being polite and being passive? Give some example
Answers
Answer:
- Polite Is having or showing behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people.
- Passive accepting or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response or resistance.
Example: Jack is liked by other for being respectful and considerate. Mark is a person who accepts everyone but also negative vibes.
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Answers
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP!!: where does the us constitution directly mention law enforcement
A. The Preamble
B. The Articles
C. The Admendments
D. It does not directly mention law enforcement
Answers
Answer:
B: The Articles
Explanation:
In the United states,state police power comes from the tenth amendment to the which gives states the right and powers not delegated to the United states.
1.
Question 1 of 2
Passing is permitted when a broken yellow or white line separates the lanes
Choose one
O A. No
OB. Yes
OC. Only during the day time.
Answers
Passing is not permitted when a broken yellow or white line separates the lanes. The answer is No. the correct option is A.
What is the rule of crossing?While changing lanes during driving a clear distance should be maintained with other vehicles in order to avoid a collision. When changing the lane it is important to see both sides of vehicles to avoid accidents.
If there are any broken yellow lines close to your driving lane, you may pass through them. There is no crossing between two solid yellow lines. Passing is permitted when there is a dashed yellow line.
Lanes with identical directions of movement are divided by white lines. Please confirm the times mentioned. Double yellow curb markings tell drivers there can never be any stopping.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Crossing lane, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29742462
#SPJ2
what makes you laugh out loud?
Answers
Answer:
when someone says a joke
Explanation:
Answer:
Enjoying jokes of joker
having fun with friends
doing the dumb stuff you do
Ted Butters, using a brick, broke a window in
a house at 1742 Head Court. He entered
the home and was in the process of stealing
a VCR when he was frightened and left the
home without the VCR. Ted, if arrested,
should be charged with:
A. unlawful entry
B. theft
C. destruction of private property
D. burglary and destruction of private property
Answers
Answer: I think he should be charged with all of the above.
If you can only pick 1 than I would go with unlawful entry.
Explanation:
Which Amendment grants someone the right to sue another person in a court of law even in the absence of a crime being committed?
a.)Fifth
b.)Sixth
c.)Seventh
d.)Eighth
Answers
Answer:
answer of this question is Fifth
Explanation:
May this answer is helpful for you
Creosote Inc. operates a plant—a "major source"—that emits hazardous air pollutants for which the Environmental Protection Agency has set maximum levels of emission. The plant does not use equipment to reduce its emissions. Under the Clean Air Act, this is most likely a. a violation. b. not a violation because a "major source" is exempt. c. not a violation because the plant does not use any equipment. d. not a violation because the plant is not a mobile source.
Answers
Equipment is used in violation to lower emissions according to the Clean Water Act.
What is a personal offense?Any violation of an individual's right, including those related to physical and mental well-being, moral integrity, and respect for personal liberties or privacy, is considered a violation of their personal rights. They consequently relate to all of a person's overall physical, emotional, and social characteristics.
What exactly are human rights violations?Genocide, torture, & arbitrary detention all constitute violations of civil and political rights. These infractions frequently take place throughout periods of conflict and when they cross over with rules governing armed conflict, it is characterized as a war crime.
To know more about violation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9365867
#SPJ4
In a 1973 book, historian Arthur Schlesinger analyzed whether the president of the United States has become overly powerful and was no longer subject to constitutional checks and balances. Schlesinger made his argument following the Watergate scandal stating, “The expansion and abuse of presidential power constitute the underlying issue, the issue that Watergate has raised to the surface, dramatized, and made politically accessible.” Take a position on whether or not Schlesinger’s argument that the presidency has become too powerful is true today. In your essay,
Articulate a claim or thesis that addresses the issue raised by Schlesinger, and use a line of reasoning to defend it.
Use at least TWO pieces of relevant and accurate evidence to support your claim or thesis.
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the foundational documents listed below:
Constitution of the United States
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 70
Brutus No. 1
Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document listed above or from your study of the American presidency.
Use reasoning to explain why the evidence you provided supports your claim or thesis.
Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing or alternative perspective.
Answers
Answer:
“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington
Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.
During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.
You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
Enter the subject you want to present.Show your argument, that is, your opinion on this subject.Present evidence, taken from the documents and articles you have read, that proves that your argument is correct and true.Show an argument contrary to yours.Present evidence, which proves that this argument is incorrect.Finish the text by reinforcing your argument.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults
Most criminal cases end in a plea bargain, not in a criminal trial. Express your views on plea bargaining. Discuss whether you believe that this system is
a good alternate to a trial where a jury would decide the fate of the defendant or whether you believe plea bargaining undermines the criminal justice
system.
Answers
Plea bargaining is a process in which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to a reduced sentence in exchange for a plea deal offered by the prosecution. This system is prevalent in the criminal justice systems of many countries, including the United States.
What is the fact about Plea bargaining ?Proponents of plea bargaining argue that it can reduce the burden on courts and save taxpayers' money. It can also help to expedite the resolution of cases, reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, and provide closure to victims and their families.
Opponents of plea bargaining argue that it can incentivize prosecutors to seek convictions at any cost, even if it means coercing defendants into pleading guilty. It can also perpetuate systemic inequalities, as defendants who cannot afford to go to trial may feel compelled to accept a plea deal, even if they are innocent. Additionally, it can lead to disparities in sentencing, as plea deals may be offered more frequently to some defendants than others.
Learn more about bargain at:
https://brainly.com/question/13538163
#SPJ1
A dead body of an elderly gentleman was discovered in an abandoned building. Blowfly pupae were found on the body. A missing person’s report was filed for an elderly gentleman who had wandered away from home just two days before. The body found was similar in age, height, and weight to the missing person. Could this possibly be the same person as the person described in the missing person’s report? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically
According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.
What is report?The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.
According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.
As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on report, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ3
Who would have had to follow the precedent
if the case had been decided by a judge in a
state supreme court?
Answers
Answer:
Lower courts
Explanation:
I'm assuming you are taking government. I suffered through government last year. So, ik
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
Answers
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Under the First Amendment, in comparison with commercial speech, the protection given obscene speech is
a. ​equally extensive.
b. ​more extensive.
c. ​non-existent.
d. ​less extensive.
Answers
C)non-existent, any communication referencing a company, product, service, brand, or practice is considered commercial speech. It explains about the aims goals and relations of a company with other.
Under the First Amendment, commercial speech is only partially shielded against infringement by-laws or other government actions. There are limited rights for commercial speech.
This type of speech involves third parties who take actions based on the speech. The government's regulation is based on a negative effect on the general people's welfare.
It does not allow any entity to give a bad impression but will allow to be good to people and provide then with good opportunities. The limitations of the government insist the regulation of commercial speech is compelling state interest to justify the restrictions.
To know more about commercial speech
brainly.com/question/14854652
Under the First Amendment, in comparison with commercial speech, the protection given obscene speech is.
a. equally extensive.
b. more extensive.
c. non-existent.
d. less extensive.
#SPJ4
a plaintiff has sued a defendant, alleging that she was run over by a speeding car driven by the defendant/
Answers
The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant
The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.
The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.
For such more question on lawsuit:
https://brainly.com/question/30707234
#SPJ11
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates _____.
Answers
Answer:
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates improves the chances of being released from prison.
most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their ________, if at all.
Answers
Most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their early adulthood, if at all. Reflective judgment refers to the ability to evaluate and make decisions based on complex information and evidence.
This cognitive ability develops gradually over time and is influenced by various factors, such as education, life experiences, and culture. However, some individuals may never reach a stage of reflective judgment due to a variety of reasons, such as cognitive disabilities, limited education or exposure to diverse perspectives.
It is important to note that reflective judgment is not a one-size-fits-all concept and individuals may demonstrate varying degrees of this ability depending on the context and the nature of the decision they are making. Therefore, it is crucial to consider individual differences and contextual factors when evaluating reflective judgment.
Most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their late adolescence or early adulthood, if at all. This developmental milestone is often reached as employees gain more experience, education, and exposure to diverse perspectives.
It's important to note that not everyone develops this skill to the same extent, and some may never fully exhibit reflective judgment. Supporting the growth of reflective judgment in individuals can lead to better decision-making, problem-solving, and overall critical thinking abilities.
To know more about employees click here
brainly.com/question/31166948
#SPJ11
research that seeks to understand the structure, nature, or scope of a nation's or nations' criminal justice systems or rates of crime is
Answers
Research that seeks to understand the structure, nature, or scope of a nation's or nations' criminal justice systems or rates of crime is referred to as descriptive research.
Descriptive research aims to provide an accurate and comprehensive portrayal of a particular phenomenon, in this case, the criminal justice systems or rates of crime in one or multiple nations. This type of research involves collecting and analyzing data to describe and document various aspects of the criminal justice systems, such as the organization, processes, policies, and institutions involved in the administration of justice.
Researchers conducting descriptive research may examine official crime statistics, legal frameworks, law enforcement practices, court proceedings, correctional systems, and other relevant factors. The objective is to obtain a clear understanding of how the criminal justice systems operate, identify trends and patterns, and assess the effectiveness or shortcomings of these systems.
Additionally, descriptive research may also investigate crime rates, including the prevalence, types, and distributions of criminal offenses within a particular nation or across multiple nations. This can involve analyzing crime reports, victimization surveys, or other sources of data to provide insights into the nature and extent of crime.
Overall, descriptive research in the field of criminal justice helps researchers, policymakers, and practitioners gain a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of criminal justice systems and crime rates. The findings of such research can inform policy decisions, guide reforms, and contribute to the development of effective strategies for crime prevention and control.
To learn more about justice Click Here: brainly.com/question/14830074
#SPJ11
1
If you decide to propose a new law in your state, what might be the first step you take?
O Send your idea to a committee to review it.
O Write a text of the law to submit to the legislature.
O Work with your state representative to write a new statute.
O Work with the governor to create a bill.
Answers
Answer:
Work with the governor to create a bill.
Explanation:
The legislative process in a nutshell
First, a Representative sponsors a bill.The bill is then assigned to a committee for study.If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.