The given statement is False, which states that, since the primary Hudson case, where the commercial speech doctrine was founded, it has not changed.
The Central Hudson test is used by the Supreme Court to decide whether a restriction on commercial speech is allowed under the First Amendment. It originates from Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm. of New York, the ruling that bears the same name.
Previously, there was no free speech protection for commercial communication. "We are equally clear that the Constitution imposes no such constraint on government as it concerns simply commercial advertising," the Supreme Court stated in Valentine V Chrestensen (1942).
The Central Hudson test continues to be the standard in the law governing commercial communication. However, a few of justices have objected to it. In recent judgments like 44 Liquormart and most recently Sorrell V IMS Health, the Court has strengthened free speech protections for commercial communication. The Central Hudson test has endured, and it is still a sound legal principle.
To learn more about Hudson case please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/13171425
#SPJ4
Settlers in maryland struggled to resolve various disputes in the early days of the colony. The maryland assembly resolved many of those disputes in 1649 by passing a law that —.
The Maryland Assembly resolved many of those disputes in 1649 by passing a law that allowed all Christians to worship freely. The correct answer is option(c).
The Maryland General Assembly, which meets in the State House in Annapolis, is the state legislature for the American state of Maryland. It is a bicameral legislature, with 141 representatives in the Maryland House of Delegates and 47 in the upper chamber (the Maryland Senate).
The General Assembly's mandate is to enact legislation required for the welfare of the State. The Legislature may construct special taxing districts or territories within the State to manage a special function or functions, as well as executive departments as necessary for the effective running of State government. The only religion allowed in Maryland is Catholicism because it was founded as a shelter for Catholics. In the colony, all governmental laws should be based on religion.
To know more about Maryland Assembly refer to: https://brainly.com/question/19428247
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Settlers in Maryland struggled to resolve various disputes in the early days of the colony. The Maryland Assembly resolved many of those disputes in 1649 by passing a law that--
granted farmland to former indentured servantsallowed men without property to vote in electionsallowed all Christians to worship freelyextended citizenship to all American Indianshow did delegates to the constitutional convention sidestep their original mandate?
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention, which took place in Philadelphia in 1787, did deviate from their original mandate to revise the Articles of Confederation.
The original intent of the convention was to propose amendments to the Articles of Confederation in order to address the weaknesses and shortcomings of the existing government system. However, the delegates ultimately went beyond their original mandate and instead drafted an entirely new constitution, which is the basis of the United States' current system of government.
There were several reasons why the delegates sidestepped their original mandate:
The flaws of the Articles of Confederation: As the convention proceeded, the delegates realized that the Articles of Confederation were fundamentally flawed and that simply amending them would not be sufficient to create a strong and effective central government. The delegates believed that a complete overhaul was necessary to address the challenges faced by the young nation.
The presence of influential leaders: The convention was attended by prominent and influential individuals, such as James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington. These leaders had a broader vision for the future of the United States and saw the opportunity to create a stronger national government that could better address the needs of the country.
Secrecy and closed proceedings: The convention was conducted in secrecy, and the delegates were given the freedom to speak their minds without fear of immediate political repercussions. This allowed for open and frank discussions among the delegates, which likely contributed to the exploration of more radical ideas and a departure from the original mandate.
To know more about deviate visit
https://brainly.com/question/8880238
#SPJ11
process of evidence recording?
Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure.
What is Evidence Recording?Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure. In the midst of an intense interview or a complex observation, it exists possible to forget to create adequate notes or overlook recording important information about how the information existed acquired. Such lapses, however, can seriously harm the research because essential facts may be forgotten or overlooked. Inadequate notes can also generate situations should any resulting sanction be appealed.
Interviews – written notes or audio recorded:
Record the interviewee’s name, address, telephone number, and connection to the certified program/incident. If others exist present during the interview, this should also be reported along with remembering information. In the rare instances when a child exists interviewed, record the date of birth.Note: because interview notes exist potentially subject to public disclosure, the certification worker must be aware of confidentiality provisions. Record the location and the beginning and stop periods of all interviews.Document the questions posed to the interviewee and their response. The certification worker should endeavor to keep the interviewee on track via skillful interviewing. Sometimes, however, superfluous data will be offered. It is normally sufficient to document statements as created and make editing decisions at a later point in the investigation.At the judgment of the certification worker, the interviewee may be requested to read written interview notes and sign and date them suggesting that the notes accurately describe what the interviewee said.Observations:
The certification worker should carefully document where the observation occurs, the start/stop time, the names of persons present and their relationship to the certified program/incident, and a factual narrative or bullet presentation of what is observed. The observation may be signed by the person(s) making them who can testify to the facts.
Affidavits and written statements:
The value of the information obtained is considerably enhanced if a witness or collateral contact is willing to make a written statement of the information furnished. Generally, the statement maker should write the statement, but this is not mandatory. In some cases, the certification worker may write the statement for the person and have every page read by, or read to, and signed and dated by the statement maker. The statement maker’s name, address, telephone number and relationship to the center / incident should be included in the statement.
Photographs:
Photographs exist good, primary evidence, as they demonstrate an objective, factual and objective record. However, they can only document visual compliance or noncompliance with certification needs. They cannot reflect the lack of some activity, object, or person because whatever exists absent could be just outside the camera’s field of vision. Photographs should be labeled with the place, time and date carried and the name(s) of a person who exists able to testify to that evidence. When a photograph lives taken of a child(ren), the confidentiality of the child(ren) shall be maintained. To the extent practicable, avoid photographing faces.
Diagrams / program floor plans:
Sometimes it may be helpful to draw a diagram of the area of objects, program staff, and so forth. This may be particularly helpful when documenting visual barriers, etc. Diagrams should be as near to scale as possible - and should be labeled and dated by the drawer.
Program documents:
The most original document exists always the best evidence to contain. However, the certification worker might have to utilize a photocopy of an original document or simply record information from monitored records. Notes on photocopies or observations should contain information about what the document designates, the date and where it existed collected, and the name of the individual who is able to testify to that evidence.
Records from other Agencies:
During the course of a complaint examination, the certification worker may require to obtain a record(s) from other agencies or offices. When a document exists obtained, it stands best practice if the person providing it proves that the document(s) exists as a true and actual copy. Some agencies or offices, particularly court agencies and law enforcement, have their own certification format.
To learn more about Evidence Recording refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27346773
#SPJ9
who is the first president of america?
Questions 16-20 choose the vocabulary word that best fits the description.
A Cast Off
B-Radial Pattern
C-Pool
D-Artery Spurts
E. Transfer
16. This was created due to fall which resulted in a blow to the head. 17. The carotid artery was damaged creating this blood pattern. 18. Michael stepped in blood as he tried to remove the body. This blood was found on the carpet of his car. 19. Each time Michael stabbed his victim blood hit the wall behind him. 20. Michael then punched his victim on the stab wound, this created a fan like blood stain pattern.
According to the information the vocabulary is related with each meaning.
How to find the explanation for each vocabulary?Here are the explanations for each vocabulary word in relation to the given descriptions:
A Cast Off - This is a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion (such as a weapon or limb) flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. In this case, if the fall resulted in the head hitting an object, the blood from the injury could have splattered and created a cast-off pattern on nearby surfaces.Artery Spurts - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that is caused by the pumping action of the heart, creating spurts of blood with each beat. If the carotid artery was damaged, it would likely create this type of pattern as blood would spurt out with each heartbeat.Transfer - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when a bloody object comes into contact with a surface, leaving a pattern behind. In this case, Michael stepping in blood and then leaving a bloody footprint on the carpet of his car would be an example of transfer.Radial Pattern - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when blood is released from a central source, such as a bleeding wound. If Michael's victim was bleeding from stab wounds and standing against a wall, each time Michael stabbed him, blood could hit the wall behind him in a radial pattern.Cast Off - This is again a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. If Michael punched his victim on the stab wound, blood could have been flung off his hand and onto nearby surfaces, creating a cast-off pattern in a fan-like shape.In conclusion, forensic science often relies on the interpretation of bloodstain patterns to help reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to a crime. Understanding the different types of bloodstain patterns and what causes them is crucial in order to accurately analyze and interpret the evidence.
Learn more about forensic science in: https://brainly.com/question/29773304
#SPJ1
The government __________ is the difference produced when spending exceeds revenues in a fiscal year while the government __________ is the total amount of money borrowed over the years that is not yet repaid.
Group of answer choices
surplus; sequestration
sequestration; surplus
debt; deficit
deficit; debt
Answer:
debt is the answer to everything related to college payment
Explanation:
Why were the Airbus actions a violation of the US Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act?
The Airbus actions violated the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act due to bribery of foreign officials and accounting irregularities.
The Airbus actions were considered a violation of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) due to several reasons. The FCPA is a US law that prohibits bribery of foreign officials and requires accurate record-keeping by companies with securities listed on US stock exchanges. Here's why the Airbus actions were deemed a violation:
Bribery: Airbus was found to have engaged in corrupt practices by offering and paying bribes to foreign officials and intermediaries to secure business contracts and gain competitive advantages. These bribes were intended to influence the decision-making of foreign officials, which directly contravenes the FCPA's anti-bribery provisions.Accounting Irregularities: The FCPA also requires accurate and transparent financial reporting. Airbus was discovered to have engaged in accounting irregularities, including misrepresenting payments, disguising bribes as legitimate business expenses, and maintaining inadequate internal controls. These actions not only violated the FCPA's accounting provisions but also undermined the integrity of financial statements and hindered proper corporate governance.Jurisdictional Reach: The FCPA applies to any company or individual, regardless of their nationality, if they engage in corrupt practices within the jurisdiction of the United States. Since Airbus is a global company with a significant presence in the US, its actions fell within the FCPA's jurisdiction.In summary, the Airbus actions violated the FCPA through bribery, accounting irregularities, and the jurisdictional reach of the law. These violations undermine the principles of fair competition, transparency, and ethical business practices that the FCPA aims to uphold.
Know more about FCPA here:
https://brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ8
Based on what you have learned, which branch of government do you believe has the most power overall? Support your opinion with examples.
I believe that legislative branch has the most power overall because it usually consisting of a parliament or congress, is responsible for making laws.
Power is normally divided among three branches of government in a democratic system: the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch.
The executive branch, which includes numerous administrative departments and agencies, is led by the chief executive, such as a president or prime minister. Its primary abilities are normally as follows:
Enforcing the lawExecutive actionsForeign policy is as followsCommander-in-chiefLegislative Branch: The legislative branch, which is usually made up of a parliament or congress, is in charge of making laws. Its primary abilities are normally as follows:
Legislative authorityBudgetary authorityOversightThe Judicial Branch The courts make up the judicial branch, which is in charge of interpreting and applying the law. Its primary abilities are normally as follows:
Review by a judge AdjudicationRights ProtectionFor such more question on legislative:
https://brainly.com/question/29788280
#SPJ11
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
On december 31, 2014 approximately ________ adults were under active parole supervisiion
Answer:
bro what is this a multi choice answer or just what
Why do firefighters need good vision so that it can be corrected to 20/20?
aids spatial awareness
tool handling
driving the engine
seeing in near darkness
seeing in near darkness or driving the engine
when determing whether parties entered into a contract courts look at objective facts, which include
Answer:
Explanation:
When determining whether parties entered into a contract, courts look at objective facts, which include the following:
Offer: Did one party make an offer to the other party? An offer is a clear and definite proposal to do something, such as sell a product or provide a service, that is made with the intention of creating a binding legal agreement.
Acceptance: Did the other party accept the offer? Acceptance is the act of agreeing to the terms of the offer. It must be unconditional and communicated to the offeror in a way that demonstrates an intent to be bound by the terms of the offer.
Consideration: Was something of value exchanged between the parties? Consideration is the value given by one party in exchange for the promise of the other party. It can be in the form of money, goods, or services.
Capacity: Were the parties capable of entering into a contract? Capacity refers to the legal ability of the parties to enter into a contract. This includes being of legal age, being of sound mind, and not being under duress or incapacitated.
Legality: Was the subject matter of the contract legal? The subject matter of the contract must be legal and not against the law or public policy.
If these objective facts are present, a court is more likely to conclude that a contract was formed. However, other factors may also be considered, such as the language and terms of the contract, the parties' conduct, and the surrounding circumstances.
Mỗi hình thái kinh tế - xã hội có 3/5 kiểu nhà nước tương ứng với nó. Quan điểm này đúng hay sai. Vì sao?
Answer:
Are you crazy this is brainly.us
Answer:
what is that I don't understand
why your doctor should care about social justice argumentative
Doctors should care about social justice because it is essential to providing quality healthcare. Social justice is the fair and just distribution of resources and opportunities in society.
When people are denied access to healthcare, education, housing, and other essential resources, it has a negative impact on their health.
There are many ways that doctors can promote social justice. They can advocate for policies that improve access to healthcare, such as universal healthcare.
They can also work to address the social determinants of health, such as poverty, discrimination, and environmental pollution. Doctors can also educate their patients about social justice issues and how they can make a difference.
To know more about social justice, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28207883#
#SPJ11
In 2001 12-year-old Lionel Tate who was try doesn't adult was convicted of killing a six-year-old girl by practicing wrestling moves on her he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole if the same crime occurred today would Lionel have been sentenced to death instead
No, even if the same crime had happened today he could not be sentenced to death if he was 12 years old.
Lionel Alexander Tate is the youngest American citizen ever sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, though this sentence was eventually overturned. In January 2001, when Tate was 12, he was convicted of first-degree murder for the 1999 battering death of six-year-old Tiffany Eunick.
The reason being, Lionel was not of competent age and he was tried as an adult as it was an exceptional case. Therefore, he could not be given death sentence even today as the judge at that time also took harshest of measures to treat him as an adult for a murder trial.
To know more about Murder Trial:
brainly.com/question/28289356
#SPJ1
When driving in rain, you should?
When driving in rain, there are several precautions you should take to ensure your safety and the safety of others on the road. Here are some tips:
Slow down: Wet roads can be slick and reduce your vehicle's traction. Reduce your speed and increase your following distance to allow for more time to stop.
Use headlights: Turn on your headlights, even if it's only raining lightly. This will help other drivers see you and improve your visibility.
Avoid sudden movements: Sudden braking, accelerating, or turning can cause your vehicle to lose traction and skid. Make gradual movements to reduce the risk of a skid.
Keep a firm grip on the steering wheel: Wet roads can cause your vehicle to hydroplane, which occurs when a layer of water comes between your tires and the road surface, reducing traction. If this happens, take your foot off the accelerator, do not brake suddenly, and steer in the direction you want to go.
Check your tires: Make sure your tires have adequate tread depth and are properly inflated. This will improve your vehicle's traction on wet roads.
Avoid using cruise control: Cruise control can cause your vehicle to accelerate or decelerate suddenly if it hydroplanes, which can lead to a loss of control.
Be aware of other drivers: Watch out for other drivers who may not be taking the same precautions as you. Stay alert and keep a safe distance from other vehicles.
Remember, driving in the rain requires extra caution and attention. By following these tips, you can reduce the risk of accidents and arrive at your destination safely.
Answer: turn on your lights and drive slow
Explanation:
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
how did Trent foster ryes reluctance to communicate
Answer:
Mr. Trent fostered Rye's reluctance by going around her and telling everyone how good a job she was doing and indicated that he wanted to hire her on a full-time .
Explanation:
A student took the state examination at a testing facility and failed. She wants to review the test and see what answers she provided. She knows that she can review the exam within two years of the date of the examination and she makes an appointment to do so. Will she be able to review the entire exam?
yes she will because she made an appointment to do so
She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
What is law?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.
According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.
As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
Learn more about on Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ5
Which Act is being violated when you post the private information of someone
on social media?
Right to privacy
Explanation by posting private information about someone on social media you are invading someone's personal life. It is there right to decide if they want to share there information or not
The act that is being violated when you post the private information of someone on social media is typically referred to as Privacy Act or Privacy Laws.
Privacy laws are designed to protect individuals' right to privacy and prevent the unauthorized disclosure of their personal information without their consent.
By posting someone's private information on social media without their permission, you are violating their right to privacy and potentially infringing upon applicable privacy laws and regulations. It is important to respect and uphold the privacy of individuals by refraining from sharing their private information without proper authorization.
To learn more about the privacy act:
brainly.com/question/31822745
how many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much.
please answer this question
Answer:
There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.
Explanation:
If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.
refer to figure 6-13. acme, inc. is a seller of the good. acme sells a unit of the good to a buyer and then pays the tax on that unit to the government. after paying the tax, acme receives how much?
When a seller such as Acme, Inc. sells a good, they may be required to pay a tax to the government on each unit sold. This tax is typically a percentage of the sale price of the good.
The amount that Acme, Inc. receives after paying the tax to the government would depend on the sale price of the good, the tax rate, and any other costs associated with producing and selling the good. In order to calculate the amount Acme, Inc. receives after paying the tax, one would need to know these specific details.
To know more about tax visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12611692
#SPJ11
The Standard Juvenile Court Act was originally issued in 1925, and revised in 1959?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
There were six editions of the Standard Juvenile Court Act. It was then revised in 1959. Hope it helps!
How do customs used in jrotc demonstrate respect for our nation and the jrotc program?.
Because they educate us to respect those who have served the country in higher positions, JROTC customs show respect for our country and the JROTC program. They exhibit adherence to the program's guidelines as well.
Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps is referred to as JROTC. It is a course that instructs pupils on leadership, diversity, and high school manners. Salutations, standing in positions consistent with rank, the use of titles, reporting techniques, etc. are examples of customs, which are ways of conducting business.
These traditions are significant because they foster respect for elders who have more years of national service. They exhibit adherence to the program's rules as well in business.
Here are more details regarding JROTC:
brainly.com/question/885973
#SPJ4
Elements of legal history
It includes the structuring and balance of power in civilizations, the management of crime, the security of individual rights and property, and the defense of weaker groups like women, immigrants, racial as well as religious minorities, and others.
What is legal history?The examination of whether and how the legislation has progressed is known as legal history or perhaps the history of law. The advancement of civilizations is strongly linked to the evolution of legal history, which acts within the broader framework of social history.
A collection of laws, court rulings, and generally recognized legal concepts; the basis for all judicial and administrative decisions; particularly, the set of guidelines, norms, and concepts that the courts of a given jurisdiction use to decide cases that are presented before court.
Learn more about legal history, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/2262651
#SPJ1
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses ona. individuals.b. large groups.c. voters.d. legislators.
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses on a. individuals.
Public choice theory emphasizes the actions and decisions of individuals in the political process, particularly in regards to their own self-interest and rational behavior. This is in contrast to elite and group theory, which suggest that a small group of elites or interest groups hold significant power and influence in shaping political outcomes. This approach considers individual preferences and behavior as the foundation for understanding decision-making in the political process.
Public choice theory also places emphasis on the role of voters and legislators, but ultimately sees their actions as being driven by individual incentives and preferences.
To know more about Public choice theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15205253
#SPJ11
The Alberta Human Rights Commission HAS the ability to: Select one: a. To receive, settle and investigate complaints. b. To sentence a party guilty of violating the Alberta Human Rights Act to a term of imprisonment. C. To make statute law. d. Refer a matter to the Alberta Provincial court.
Victor was the vice president of design at Fashion Corporation. One day, Victor was told to report to the warehouse for full time duty with a thirty percent reduction in pay. Victor would likely have an action against Fashion Corporation for: Select one: a. Breach of fiduciary duty. b. Constructive dismissal. c. Passing off. d. A fallure to mitigate.
The Alberta Human Rights Commission HAS the ability to receive, settle and investigate complaints. Victor would likely have an action against Fashion Corporation for constructive dismissal. The answer is (A).
The Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is the province's principal human rights agency. The Alberta Human Rights Commission is an independent agency of the government that supports and promotes human rights across Alberta.
The Commission's primary duty is to investigate and resolve complaints about discrimination. When someone believes their rights have been violated, they may file a complaint with the Commission. After that, the Commission will conduct an inquiry and, if necessary, a public hearing. If the inquiry or public hearing reveals that there was discrimination, the Commission will issue a decision that can include orders to remedy the situation and provide compensation.
Constructive dismissal is a type of unfair dismissal in which an employee resigns as a result of their employer's behavior or a breach of the terms of their employment contract. If the employee resigns as a result of the employer's conduct, it is referred to as "constructive" because the employer's behavior has effectively made the employee's job untenable. Therefore, Victor would likely have an action against Fashion Corporation for constructive dismissal. The answer is (B).
To learn more about Human Rights here
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ11
Do you think Geo-Fencing is an invasion of privacy? Why?
Answer: Law enforcement officers have been using geofencing to find the location data of mobile devices in the area of a committed crime. While this gives them the ability to find a possible suspect, consumers feel it is a violation of privacy for the innocent parties.
jane has filed her complaint of discrimination. she also wants to seek some sort of punitive damages. what are her options, if any?