Similarity statement, Identify Congruent angles, and corresponding proportional sides

Tyler drank a total of 9 2/21 liters of water altogether.  

Tyler drank a fraction of 9 5/21 liters of water altogether. To find the total amount of water Tyler drank, we need to add the 2 3 liters of water he drank before jogging and the 3 7 liters of water he drank after jogging. To add these fractions, we need to find a common denominator, which is 21.

For the first fraction, we need to multiply both the numerator and denominator by 7 to get 14/21. For the second fraction, we need to multiply both the numerator and denominator by 3 to get 9/21. Now, we can add these two fractions:

14/21 + 9/21 = 23/21

This is an improper fraction, so we can simplify it to a mixed number by dividing the numerator by the denominator:

23 ÷ 21 = 1 remainder 2

So, Tyler drank a total of 9 2/21 liters of water altogether.

Drinking enough water is essential for staying hydrated and healthy, especially during exercise. It is recommended to drink at least 8 cups (64 ounces or 1.9 liters) of water per day, but this can vary depending on factors such as age, gender, weight, and physical activity level. Drinking enough water can help prevent dehydration, regulate body temperature, flush out toxins, and improve overall health and well-being.
 

Learn more about fraction brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11

Answer:

$305.9022863 or $305.90 (rounded to 2 decimal places)

Step-by-step explanation:

It is a compound interest, meaning an interest accumulates on an initial amount every period. The formula  

A= P(1+R)^n

A= the total amount P=Initial amount       R= rate  n=time period

P=$100 R=15% or 0.15(decimal)  n=8 (years)  

A= 100 (1.15)^8

A= 100(3.059022863)

A=305.9022863

The amount you will have after 8 years is $220

The formula for calculating simple interest is expressed as:

SI =PRT

P is the principal = $100

T is the time = 8 years

R is the rate. = 15%

SI = 100 * 8 * 0.15
SI = $120

Amount after 8years = $100 + $120
Amount after 8years = $220

Hence the amount you will have after 8 years is $220

Learn more on interest here: https://brainly.com/question/2151013

#SPJ12

Answer:

The weight is 95.53 ounces of bluegill which has a length of 9.5 inches using linear regression.

Step-by-step explanation:

good luck to you

Answer:

y' = a(x'- ((h-15)/20))² + -(k-30)

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertex: (h,k)

horizontally translated 15 units left: (h-15 , k)

stretch by a factor of 20: ((h-15)/20 , k)

vertically translated down 30 units: ((h-15)/20 , k-30)

reflected in the x axis: ((h-15)/20 , -(k-30))

Vertex' (h' , k'): ((h-15)/20 , -(k-30))

Equation: y' = a(x'-h')² + k'

y' = a(x'- ((h-15)/20))² + -(k-30)

Take the inverse tangent of both sides:

The cost of the cardboard used for making 500 boxes is 1890.

To calculate the cost of the cardboard used for making 500 boxes, we need to determine the total area of cardboard required and then multiply it by the cost of the cardboard per unit area.

Total area of one box:

Length = 30 cm

Width = 20 cm

Height = 6 cm

Surface area of the box = 2 * (Length * Width + Width * Height + Height * Length)

= 2 * (30 * 20 + 20 * 6 + 6 * 30)

= 2 * (600 + 120 + 180)

= 2 * 900

= 1800 cm^2

Total area of one box including overlaps:

Additional 5% area required for overlaps = 5/100 * 1800 cm^2

= 90 cm^2

Total area of one box including overlaps = 1800 cm^2 + 90 cm^2

= 1890 cm^2

Total area of cardboard required for 500 boxes:

Total area of cardboard required = Total area of one box including overlaps * Number of boxes

= 1890 cm^2 * 500

= 945,000 cm^2

Cost of the cardboard per unit area:

Cost of the cardboard = Rs 2 for 1000 cm^2

Cost per unit area = Rs 2 / 1000 cm^2

Cost of the cardboard used for making 500 boxes:

Cost of the cardboard used = Total area of cardboard required * Cost per unit area

= 945,000 cm^2 * (Rs 2 / 1000 cm^2)

= Rs 1890

The cost of the cardboard used for making 500 boxes is Rs 1890.

Learn more about Area of box here  https://brainly.com/question/22998786

#SPJ11

The P-value for the hypothesis test is approx. 0.7064.

To find the P-value for the hypothesis test, we need to perform a two-sample proportion test. The formula to calculate the test statistic for this test is given by:

\(\[ z = \frac{{(\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) - 0}}{{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{{n_1}} + \frac{1}{{n_2}}\right)}}} \]\)

where \(\hat{p}_1\) and \(\hat{p}_2\) are the sample proportions, \(\hat{p}\) is the combined sample proportion, \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes, and 0 is the hypothesized difference in proportions.

In this case, we have \(n_1 = 50\), \(x_1 = 8\) (number of successes in sample 1), \(n_2 = 50\), and \(x_2 = 7\) (number of successes in sample 2).

First, we calculate the sample proportions:

\(\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{8}{50} = 0.16 \]\)

\(\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{7}{50} = 0.14 \]\)

Next, we calculate the combined sample proportion:

\(\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{8 + 7}{50 + 50} = 0.15 \]\)

Then, we calculate the standard error:

\(\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{{n_1}} + \frac{1}{{n_2}}\right)} = \sqrt{0.15(1 - 0.15)\left(\frac{1}{50} + \frac{1}{50}\right)} \approx 0.0529 \]\)

Finally, we calculate the test statistic:

\(\[ z = \frac{(\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) - 0}{SE} = \frac{(0.16 - 0.14) - 0}{0.0529} \approx 0.3772 \]\)

To find the P-value, we look up the test statistic in the standard normal distribution table. In this case, the P-value is the probability of observing a test statistic greater than 0.3772 or less than -0.3772.

Consulting the table, we find that the P-value is approximately 0.7064. Therefore, the P-value for the hypothesis test is approximately 0.7064.

To know more about P-value refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ11

Scenario i)

Null hypothesis: The proportion of Americans who say that the chances of world peace are seriously threatened by the nuclear capabilities of other countries is equal to two-thirds (66.67%).

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of Americans who say that the chances of world peace are seriously threatened by the nuclear capabilities of other countries is different from two-thirds.

Scenario ii)

Null hypothesis: The proportion of gaming headsets with manufacturing flaws that make game-play impossible is less than 9%.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of gaming headsets with manufacturing flaws that make game-play impossible is at least 9%.

Scenario iii)

Null hypothesis: The mean water temperature downstream from JP's Power Plant's cooling tower discharge pipe is 106°F.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean water temperature downstream from JP's Power Plant's cooling tower discharge pipe is more than 106°F.

2. The power of a hypothesis test indicates the ability of the test to correctly reject the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is true. A power of 0.9382 suggests that the test procedure has a high probability of detecting a true effect or difference. Therefore, based on the power of the test, it can be considered a good test procedure.

to more about proportion visit:

brainly.com/question/31010676

#SPJ11

Answer: A) y= -1/2x+5

Step-by-step explanation: If the line is perpendicular to the original, the  new "m" (coefficient  of x) has to be the negative reciprocal of the original "m"

Francis made an error in writing the explicit formula. The correct formula should be an = 4 * (1/4)⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾, not an = 4 * (1/4)ⁿ⁻¹. The exponent should be (n-1), not just n, to correctly represent the sequence where the second term is 8 and the fourth term is 2.

To determine the error in Francis' formula, we need to apply it to the known terms of the sequence and see if it produces the correct values. For example, for the second term, n = 2, so using Francis' formula:

an = 4 * (1/4)⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾ = 4 * (1/4)¹ = 4 * 1/4 = 1

But the second term of the sequence is 8, not 1. So the formula is incorrect.

Similarly, for the fourth term, n = 4, so using Francis' formula:

an = 4 * (1/4)⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾ = 4 * (1/4)³ = 4 * 1/64 = 1/16

But the fourth term of the sequence is 2, not 1/16. So the formula is still incorrect.

Therefore, we can conclude that the formula written by Francis is not correct and needs to be corrected to accurately describe the sequence.

Learn more about Explicit Formula Error Correction here:

https://brainly.com/question/14072492

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Measure of an inscribed angle intercepted by an arc is half of the measure of the arc.

From the picture attached,

m(∠A) = \(\frac{1}{2}m(\text{arc BD})\)

           = \(\frac{1}{2}[m(\text{BC})+m(\text{CD}]\)

           = \(\frac{1}{2}[55^{\circ}+145^{\circ}]\)

           = 100°

m(∠C) = \(\frac{1}{2}[(360^{\circ})-m(\text{arc BCD})]\)

           = \(\frac{1}{2}(360^{\circ}-200^{\circ})\)

           = 80°

m(∠B) + m(∠D) = 180° [ABCD is cyclic quadrilateral]

115° + m(∠D) = 180°

m(∠D) = 65°

m(arc AC) = 2[m(∠D)]

m(arc AB) + m(arc BC) = 2(65°) [Since, m(arc AC) = m(arc AB) + m(arc BC)]

m(arc AB) + 55° = 130°

m(arc AB) = 75°

m(arc ADC) = 2(m∠B)

m(arc AD) + m(arc DC) = 2(115°)

m(arc AD) + 145° = 230°

m(arc AD) = 85°

The range of a sequence of points in a metric space is generally not a closed set. However, it may be a closed set.

The main answer is that the range of a sequence of points in a metric space is generally not a closed set. However, it may be a closed set. The fact that in a normed linear space the closure of an open ball is in the closed ball is of importance in the proof.

The range of a sequence of points in a metric space is generally not a closed set. Suppose a sequence (Xn) in a metric space X is such that the range of (Xn) is denoted as R(Xn). Then, since the range of a sequence is always a subset of the space X, R(Xn) is a closed set if and only if its complement is open.

Here we show that the complement of R(Xn) is generally closed. Let us assume that R(Xn) is closed. Then the complement of R(Xn), the set

X \ R(Xn) = U, is open. For any x in U, since x does not belong to R(Xn), there exists an open ball B(x,ε) such that

B(x,ε) ∩ R(Xn) = ∅.

Then there exists an n in the natural numbers such that

d(x,Xn) = dist(x, Xn) < ε/2.

Therefore, if y is any point in B(x,ε/2), then

d(y, Xn) ≤ d(y,x) + d(x,Xn) < ε/2 + ε/2 = ε.

Hence, B(x,ε/2) is contained in U, which shows that U is open. Since U is open, R(Xn) is closed.

Therefore, we can conclude that the range of a sequence of points in a metric space is generally not a closed set. However, it may be a closed set. The fact that in a normed linear space the closure of an open ball is in the closed ball is of importance in the proof.

To know more about metric space, visit:

brainly.com/question/32645192

#SPJ11

Answer:

18 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

If you divide 15 (miles) into 50 groups (min) you will get Jana's speed per min and then you can multiply that speed by sixty to her the speed per hour.

Answer:

decision-making

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

g(f(2)) is substituting the value of f(2) for x in g(x). But we must first find f(2).

We know that f (x) = ax² - 12

Since f(3) = 24

  ⇒ a(3²) - 12 = 24

       9 a  = 36

          a  = 4

∴ f(2) = (4)(2²) - 12

         =  4

⇒ g(f(2)) = 2(4) + 3

             = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer is 11 I think......

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

you go down from the dot left most and you count towards the line that the second dot falls on and count over too it

Answer:

slope = - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the slope m using the slope formula

m = \(\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }\)

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (1, 2) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (2, - 1) ← 2 points on the line

m = \(\frac{-1-2}{2-1}\) = \(\frac{-3}{1}\) = - 3

1 Chinese yuan could purchase $0.12 and $0.15 in the year 2010 and 2012 respectively.

For the year 2010; we can calculate as follows;

1 US dollar = 8.24 Chinese yuan

x US dollar = 1 Chinese Yuan

using cross multiplication to find x;

8.24x = 1 ×1

8.24x = 1

x = 1 / 8.24

x = $0.12

For the year 2012; we can calculate as follows;

1 US dollar = 6.64 Chinese Yuan

x US dollar = 1 Chinese Yuan

Using cross multiplication to find x;

6.64x = 1

x = 1 / 6.64

x = $0.15

Therefore, one Chinese yuan could purchase $0.12 in 2010 and $0.15 in the year 2012.

To learn more about cross multiplication; click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23064464

#SPJ4

Answer:

3168 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question,

The volume of the rectangular tank = Length×width×heigth

V = lwh.................... Equation 1

Where l = length, w = width, h = heigth.

Given: l = 22 cm, w = 9 cm, h = 16 cm

Substitute these values into equation 1

V = 22×9×16

V = 3168 cm³

Hence the volume of the rectangular tank is 3168 cm³

Answer:

10 ÷ 16

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation is shown below

Given that

Paul required to buy 5 by 8 pound of peanuts

And, the scale at the store is in sixteenths

So, the measure that should be equivalent is

Here the denominator should be 16 so it should be multiplied by 2

= 5 ÷ 8 × 2 ÷ 2

= 10 ÷ 16

The probability that she selects the route of three specific capitals is 97290/1.

The probability that she selects the route of three specific capitals can be calculated by taking the total number of possible routes and dividing it by the total number of routes that involve the three specific capitals. To calculate the total number of possible routes, multiply the number of states (47) by the number of routes that could be selected from each state (2). This gives 94 total possible routes.

47 x 46 x 45 ways = 97290 ways

= 1/97290

Now, calculate the number of routes that involve the three specific capitals. Since the president is selecting three states, the total number of routes will be 3. Therefore, the probability that she selects the route of three specific capitals is 3/94, which can be simplified to 97290/1.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

3 and 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Alternate interior angles are the angles in between the two lines and on the inside

4 and 6

3 and 5

Answer:

∠3 and ∠5 are alternate interior angles

Step-by-step explanation:

By the definition, alternate interior angles are angles that are inside the lines and opposite sides of each other on the transversal.

Applying the ratio test to the given series results in the inequality lim nnÏ 2/17n<1, which implies that the series converges. Therefore, the correct answer is (A).

The ratio test is a method used to determine the convergence or divergence of an infinite series. The test involves taking the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms in the series as n approaches infinity. If this limit is less than 1, then the series converges, and if it is greater than 1, then the series diverges.

In this case, applying the ratio test to the given series involves taking the limit of the ratio of the (n+1)th term and nth term as n approaches infinity. Simplifying this ratio using the given expression for the nth term, we get [(n+1)/n] Ï 2/17. Taking the limit of this expression as n approaches infinity gives us 2/17, which is less than 1. Therefore, the series converges.

The other options presented in the question involve taking the limit of different expressions, which do not correspond to the ratio test for infinite series. Therefore, they do not provide a valid method for determining the convergence or divergence of the given series.

To learn more about the Infinite series, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29062598

#SPJ11

Answer:

zoom in on pic plz and reupload

Step-by-step explanation:

The capacity of the pond is 5.29 \(m^{3}\).

What is the volume of a cylinder?

The space inside a cylinder that can accommodate a particular quantity of material is referred to as the cylinder's volume. A cylinder's volume is, to put it another way, how much it can hold.

Given, the radius, r = 1.5 m

height, h = 750 mm = 0.75 m

The capacity of the pond is calculated by the volume of a cylinder, which is given by,

The volume of a cylinder, V = \(\pi r^{2}h\) = \((3.14)(1.5)^{2}(0.75)\) = 5.29 \(m^{3}\)

Hence, the capacity of the pond is 5.29 \(m^{3}\).

To learn more about the volume of a cylinder

https://brainly.com/question/11874857

#SPJ4

Royal Canin cat food decreased the size of their cat food cans by 0.7 oz, resulting in a percent decrease of approximately 12.07%. The cost of the missing 0.7 oz of cat food can be found using a proportion and is approximately $1.34.

To find the percent decrease in the size of the cat food cans, we can use the formula:

percent decrease = ((original value - new value) / original value) * 100

In this case, the original value is 5.8 oz and the new value is 5.1 oz, so we have:

percent decrease = ((5.8 - 5.1) / 5.8) * 100

percent decrease = (0.7 / 5.8) * 100

percent decrease = 12.07%

Therefore, the percent decrease in the size of the cat food cans is approximately 12.07%.

To find the cost of the missing 0.7 oz of cat food, we can use the proportion:

(cost / weight) = (cost / weight)

where the cost and weight on the left side of the equation represent the known values, and the cost and weight on the right side of the equation represent the unknown values. We can solve for the unknown cost by cross-multiplying:

(cost / 5.1) = ($1.52 / 5.8)

(cost * 5.8) = ($1.52 * 5.1)

cost = ($1.52 * 5.1) / 5.8

cost = $1.34 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Therefore, the cost of the missing 0.7 oz of cat food is approximately $1.34.

To know more about percentage, click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ1

You can infer causality from a correlational result, but only when the r value is greater than:

C. 1

Causality refers to a situation in which one event causes another. When there is a correlation between two variables, it means that they tend to move in the same direction.

However, this does not necessarily mean that one event causes the other. In order for a correlation to indicate causality, the correlation coefficient (r) must be greater than 1. If the correlation coefficient is below 1, then there is not enough evidence to suggest that one event causes the other.

In addition, there are other factors that need to be considered when assessing causality from a correlational result.

For example, the strength of the relationship between the variables, the direction of the relationship, and the consistency of the results over time. It is also important to consider the context in which the research was conducted, as this may have an effect on the results.

Learn more about causality:

brainly.com/question/9369134

#SPJ4

Answer:

H and N

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It depends on the type of function, but essentially the process is the same

Step-by-step explanation:

You gather up all of the y values and x values and plot them onto a coordinate grid. If you are using a calculator, go to the "y=" button and input the function and then hit "graph"

Answer:

when the same person sits on the same board of directors two or more companies ..

The maximum cycle time is the time taken for the slowest task, which is 9.16 minutes. So, the maximum cycle time is 9.16 minutes.

The maximum cycle time is the longest amount of time it takes for a complete cycle of the process. In this case, the three tasks have varying completion times, but the longest time is 9.16 minutes.

It is important to consider the maximum cycle time when designing and improving business processes, as it determines the overall efficiency and productivity of the process. By identifying and minimizing the longest task time, the process can be streamlined and optimized for maximum efficiency.

Therefore, understanding the maximum cycle time is crucial for effective process management.

To know more about maximum cycle time refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31388380

#SPJ11