Shelby has been laid off due to downsizing. She is worried about her health coverage as she has just found out she is pregnant. The HR benefits specialist tells her that she can continue to pay for health coverage for up to 36 months due to which law

Answer:

Difference between the standing committee and technical committee of SAARC​ is described below in brief details.

Explanation:

Answer: Positivism- it's a philosophy of every justifiable assertion can be backed up by science and mathematical proof.

Rational theory- Refers to the theory of why humans behave as they might what causes certain behaviours.

Explanation:

Answer:

A very balanced amount.

Too much power to a democratic leader, and there could be some troubles

But too little, and other areas of leadership and guarding is compromised  

Explanation:

Answer:

Strain theory is a sociology and criminology theory developed in 1938 by Robert K. Merton. The theory states that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (such as the American dream), though they lack the means.

Explanation:

Answer:

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)

Explanation:

Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.

When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).

This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.

Answer:

I. Air temperature: thermometer.

II. Wind speed: wind vane.

III. Relative humidity: hygrometer.

Explanation:

Weather can be defined as the atmospheric conditions of a particular area over a short period of time.

The elements of weather include precipitation, wind, temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, cloud, and wind speed.

In this project, a student want to be able to predict the weather by using tools that will measure the following elements of weather;

I. Air temperature: a thermometer is the meteorological tool that should be used to measure it. Temperature can be defined as a measure of the degree of coldness or hotness of a physical object. It is measured with a thermometer and its units are Celsius (°C), Kelvin (K) and Fahrenheit (°F).

II. Wind speed: a wind vane is a device designed for the measurements of wind speed. Wind speed can be defined as a measure of the rate at which the wind moves at a particular point in time.

III. Relative humidity: the students should use a hygrometer to measure it. Relative humidity can be defined as an amount of water vapor present in the air, expressed as a percentage with respect to the maximum it can hold at the same temperature.

Answer:

Explanation:

Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:

Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.

Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.

Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.

Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.

Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.

Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.

Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.

In the Sherbert v. Verner case, the Supreme Court ruled that denying unemployment benefits to someone who was fired for refusing to work on Saturdays for religious reasons was unconstitutional or a violation of their First Amendment rights.

The Sherbert v. Verner case took place in 1963 in the United States Supreme Court. The Sherbert v. Verner case dealt with the question of whether an individual could be denied unemployment compensation benefits due to their religious beliefs. Adell Sherbert, the plaintiff, was a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church who refused to work on Saturdays due to her religious beliefs. Sherbert lost her job when her employer changed her schedule, requiring her to work on Saturdays.

As a result, Sherbert filed for unemployment compensation benefits, but her application was denied because she was not available for work on Saturdays.The Supreme Court held that denying unemployment benefits to someone who was fired for refusing to work on Saturdays for religious reasons was a violation of their First Amendment rights. The court ruled that the South Carolina law was unconstitutional under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

Learn more about Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ11

Answer:

A.Sale of commercial property

Explanation:

Answer:

Hello There!!

Explanation:

The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)

hope this helps, have a great day!!

~Pinky~

Appellate Courts play an essential role in the legal system of every country as they are responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts and ensuring that legal errors are corrected.

The legal process would be significantly impacted if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or criminal case. Here's what would happen in such a scenario:Content loadedThe quality of justice would be affected: Appellate Courts offer a second chance at justice for those who feel like they have been wronged in the Trial Courts.

Without Appellate Courts, there would be no way to appeal decisions made in lower courts. This could lead to wrongful convictions and the denial of justice to those who are genuinely innocent.The stability of the law would be affected: Appellate Courts also play a crucial role in ensuring the stability of the law by establishing legal precedents that are binding on lower courts.

The lack of Appellate Courts would mean that there would be no authoritative interpretation of the law. This could result in inconsistent decisions being made by lower courts, which could make it challenging to predict the outcome of legal disputes.The time and expense of litigation would increase: Without Appellate Courts, all legal disputes would have to be settled in the Trial Courts. This would increase the time and expense of litigation significantly. It would also put more pressure on the Trial Courts to make correct decisions. This could lead to long waiting periods, delayed justice, and increased frustration among litigants.

In conclusion, Appellate Courts play an essential role in ensuring the quality of justice, the stability of the law, and the efficiency of the legal system. If they did not exist, the legal process would be impacted significantly, leading to an increase in the time and expense of litigation, inconsistency in the law, and wrongful convictions. Therefore, it is essential that Appellate Courts continue to function as a necessary check on the decisions of lower courts.

To know more about Appellate Courts visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13944421

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.  

Explanation:

Answer:

A scientist might choose a fieldwork instead of laboratory experiment in order to answer for example some. Often the best observations are made in the field.

The CPD can reduce the 15% polling requirement and allow third party candidates to debate with the top two parties to avoid lawsuits and confrontations.

What does Lawsuit means?

A lawsuit is a civil action brought in a court of law by a plaintiff against a defendant, alleging that the defendant has committed a legal wrong. It is a dispute between two or more parties that seeks legal relief in the form of a judgment for damages, an injunction, or other court order.

What does Injunction mean?

An injunction forbids someone from doing something. It is an example of an equitable remedy. Injunctions are commonly used to prevent one party from doing something that could cause irreparable harm to another. For example, a court may issue an injunction to prevent a person from disposing of assets or engaging in activities that could jeopardize the legal rights of another party.

To know more about  Injunction,

https://brainly.com/question/28452554

#SPJ1

The jurisdiction of local police agencies is limited to the geographical boundaries of the locality they operate in.

Jurisdiction refers to the area within which a police department is allowed to operate and enforce laws. The jurisdiction of local police agencies is limited to the geographical boundaries of the locality they operate in. These boundaries can be based on the city, county, or state that the department operates within.Law enforcement agencies are divided into several levels, such as local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. Local police agencies usually have jurisdiction within the boundaries of their locality, such as a city or town, whereas state and federal law enforcement agencies have broader jurisdiction that can cover multiple localities or even the entire country.In summary, the geographical boundaries of the locality determine the jurisdiction of local police agencies. These agencies have the power to enforce laws only within the boundaries of the locality they operate in.

To know more about Jurisdiction visit:

brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

Answer:

David rossi

Explanation:

Answer:

.

Explanation:

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

The probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To satisfy Equation 5.1, we need to ensure that all values in the "Disposed" column are non-negative. In this case, all the values provided are greater than or equal to zero, so Equation 5.1 is satisfied.

Next, to satisfy Equation 5.2, we need to calculate the sum of all the values in the "Disposed" column and divide each value by the total sum:

Total Disposed cases: 43945

Probability distribution for the "Disposed" column:

Fred Cartolano: 3037 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Thomas Crush: 3372 / 43945 ≈ 0.077

Patrick Dinkelacker: 1258 / 43945 ≈ 0.029

Timothy Hogan: 1954 / 43945 ≈ 0.044

Robert Kraft: 3138 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

William Mathews: 2264 / 43945 ≈ 0.052

William Morrissey: 3032 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Norbert Nadel: 2959 / 43945 ≈ 0.067

Arthur Ney Jr.: 3219 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Richard Niehaus: 3353 / 43945 ≈ 0.076

Thomas Nurre: 3000 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

John O'Connor: 2969 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

Robert Ruehlman: 3205 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Ann Marie Tracey: 3141 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

Ralph Winkler: 3089 / 43945 ≈ 0.070

Now, if we sum up all these probabilities, we get:

\(0.069 + 0.077 + 0.029 + 0.044 + 0.071 + 0.052 + 0.069 + 0.067 + 0.073 + 0.076 + 0.068 + 0.068 + 0.073 + 0.071 + 0.070 ≈ 1\)

The sum of the probabilities is approximately 1, which satisfies Equation 5.2.

Therefore, the probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

Answer:Modernization theory is used to explain the process of modernization within societies. Modernization theory originated from the ideas of German sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920), which provided the basis for the modernization paradigm developed by Harvard sociologist Talcott Parsons (1902–1979). The theory looks at the internal factors of a country while assuming that with assistance, "traditional" countries can be brought to development in the same manner more developed countries have been. Modernization theory was a dominant paradigm in the social sciences in the 1950s and 1960s, then went into a deep eclipse. It made a comeback after 1991 but remains a controversial model.[1]

Modernization theory both attempts to identify the social variables that contribute to social progress and development of societies and seeks to explain the process of social evolution. Modernization theory is subject to criticism originating among socialist and free-market ideologies, world-systems theorists, globalization theorists and dependency theorists among others. Modernization theory stresses not only the process of change but also the responses to that change. It also looks at internal dynamics while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies.

Modernization refers to a model of a progressive transition from a 'pre-modern' or 'traditional' to a 'modern' society. Modernization theory suggests that traditional societies will develop as they adopt more modern practices. Proponents of modernization theory claim that modern states are wealthier and more powerful and that their citizens are freer to enjoy a higher standard of living[citation needed]. Developments such as new data technology and the need to update traditional methods in transport, communication and production make modernization necessary or at least preferable to the status quo. That view makes critique difficult since it implies that such developments control the limits of human interaction, not vice versa. And yet, seemingly paradoxically, it also implies that human agency controls the speed and severity of modernization. Supposedly, instead of being dominated by tradition, societies undergoing the process of modernization typically arrive at forms of governance dictated by abstract principles. Traditional religious beliefs and cultural traits, according to the theory, usually become less important as modernization takes hold.[2]

Today, the concept of modernization is understood in three different meanings: 1) as the internal development of Western Europe and North America relating to the European New Era; 2) as a process by which countries that do not belong to the first group of countries, aim to catch up with them; 3) as processes of evolutionary development of the most modernized societies (Western Europe and North America), i.e. modernization as a permanent process, carried out through reform and innovation, which today means a transition to a postindustrial society.[3] Historians link modernization to the processes of urbanization and industrialization and the spread of education. As Kendall (2007) notes, "Urbanization accompanied modernization and the rapid process of industrialization."[4] In sociological critical theory, modernization is linked to an overarching process of rationalization. When modernization increases within a society, the individual becomes increasingly important, eventually replacing the family or community as the fundamental unit of society. It is also a subject taught in traditional Advanced Placement World History classes.

Explanation: hope it helps

The environmental issue that has meaning and value to me is climate change.

Climate change simply refers to the long-term shifts in the temperature and weather pattern. Climate change can be a result of variations in the solar cycle or human activities.

Climate change brings about an alteration in temperature. It can be due to fossil fuels, deforestation, etc. Therefore, it's important for individuals to engage in activities that won't have a negative impact on the environment.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/21280235

True, Puffery is not always illegal in the United States under state and federal law.Puffery is a concept that refers to the use of highly descriptive and imaginative statements by advertisers or marketers.

Its frequently used to exaggerate the effectiveness of a product or service. Puffery is used to increase sales and build brand recognition, but it is not illegal in the United States under state and federal law.Puffery has no clear definition, and it is frequently up to the court to determine whether the advertisement constitutes puffery or misleading information. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) determines whether an advertisement is false or misleading based on how a reasonable customer would interpret it. False advertising, as opposed to puffery, may be prosecuted by federal or state authorities.Puffery is commonly used in advertising, and it is not illegal as long as it does not include fraudulent or deceptive claims. Puffery may be confusing or appear deceptive, but it is not always illegal because the advertiser did not use specific promises or claims to describe the product or service.The puffery must be clear that it is an exaggeration, and the claims made must be easily accepted as such by the general public. Puffery must not deceive the customer, or it could be classified as a fraudulent act by the Federal Trade Commission.Thus, it can be concluded that puffery is not always illegal in the United States under state and federal law.

to know more about Puffery visit:

brainly.com/question/30030434

#SPJ11

In the case of Donald Myers, the trial court ruled that he was not insane at the time of the crime. The court reached this decision after reviewing the evidence and testimony presented during the trial.

In particular, the court noted that Myers had a history of mental illness and had previously been hospitalized for his condition. However, the court found that this did not necessarily mean that he was insane at the time of the crime. Instead, the court focused on the evidence regarding Myers' behavior leading up to and during the crime.

This evidence included testimony from witnesses who saw Myers behaving normally in the days and hours before the crime, as well as evidence that he had planned and carried out the crime in a deliberate and purposeful manner. Based on this evidence, the court concluded that Myers was not suffering from a mental illness that rendered him incapable of understanding the nature and consequences of his actions.

To know more about necessarily visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32679605

#SPJ11

The correct answer is True. In pari delicto occurs when both parties are equally at fault or in violation of the law. In the context of a loan, if a party gives a loan at an interest rate that exceeds the legal maximum.  

Both the lender and borrower are in violation of the law and therefore in pari delicto. This means that neither party can enforce the contract in court, as it would be against public policy to do so. Therefore, it is important for lenders to ensure that they are complying with legal maximum interest rates to avoid being in pari delicto. It is also important for borrowers to be aware of their legal rights and obligations when borrowing money, including the maximum interest rates allowed by law, to protect themselves from entering into agreements that are unenforceable.

To know more about pari delicto

https://brainly.com/question/15095413

#SPJ11

Answer:

United States, the U.S. Supreme Court defines probable cause as where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.

Explanation:

The Statute of Limitations on any medical malpractice case (to file a claim) after injury or death is 3 years.

The statement "The Affordable Care Act (ACA) involved caps on medical malpractice cases and tort reform was an important factor in the ACA." is false as Affordable Care Act primarily focuses on healthcare reform, insurance coverage, and expanding access to healthcare.

The time frame within which a legal action must be filed is referred to as the Statute of Limitations. The Statute of Limitations establishes the window of time within which a claim must be made in a medical malpractice case following an injury or fatality brought on by medical negligence.

The Statute of Limitations for medical malpractice claims is typically three years in length in many jurisdictions including some states in the United States. This means that people who believe they are the victims of medical malpractice must file a lawsuit within three years of the injury, the date they learned of the negligence or the date they reasonably should have known about it.

The applicable Statute of Limitations for medical malpractice cases should be determined by consulting the specific laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction in order to ensure accuracy. This can assist people in comprehending the window of opportunity they have to file a claim and protect their legal rights.

Learn more about Statute of Limitations at:

brainly.com/question/12985717

#SPJ4

Answer:

what do you want ?

Explanation:

Answer:

B is actively engaged in the group.

Answer:

I can provide a brief definition of each term and how it relates to American Government:

1. Supreme: Refers to the highest authority or court in the United States, the Supreme Court, which has the power to interpret the Constitution and federal laws.

2. Ordain: To establish or enact a law or regulation, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "ordain and establish" the government.

3. Tranquility: Refers to the goal of maintaining peace and order within the United States, as stated in the Constitution's preamble.

4. Posterity: Refers to future generations, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

5. Statutes: Refers to laws enacted by Congress or state legislatures, which are binding and enforceable.

6. Monarchy: A form of government in which a single ruler, usually a king or queen, holds supreme power.

7. Treaties: Formal agreements between two or more countries, negotiated and ratified by the President and Senate, which have the force of law.

8. Treason: The crime of betraying one's country, often defined as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.

9. Preamble: The introductory statement to the Constitution, which outlines the purpose and goals of the document.

10. Interstate: Refers to commerce or travel between two or more states, which is regulated by the federal government under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

These terms are all important concepts in American Government and have been applied in various ways throughout history.