Sam, a prospective client comes into your office and brings with her a copy of a summons and complaint she was just served with. The papers were hand delivered to her by a process server seven days ago. You and the attorney discuss the merits of the case and determine that you will take her on as a client and prepare an answer. The answer is due in thirteen days. You prepare the answer, the attorney reviews it and gives it to the secretary to file and serve. The answer is now due in three days.
You take off on vacation the following week. Two days later, the attorney runs into a client in Court who mentions the $10k in cash he dropped off last week to the secretary. The attorney never received the money and suddenly realizes why his bank accounts have been short for the past few months. He calls the secretary and fires her. When he gets back to the office later that afternoon, the secretary is gone.
Three months later, Sam comes into your office irate that she was turned down for a car loan because she has a judgement against her. The bank tells her the judgment is from the same person who is named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit she hired you to defend her in. You use your crafty paralegal skills that you honed in your Civil Litigation class and discover that the answer was never filed or served and a default judgement was entered against your client.
The attorney now asks you to research whether the "law office failure" statute will cover him for this, or should file a claim with his malpractice carrier.

You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. I would you to go ahead and select one of the candidates. The right to vote is one of the most significant liberties enjoyed by citizens of the United States.

Elections offer a crucial chance to advance democracy and promote political liberalization. Certain civil liberties, like the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for an election to be free and fair. Suffrage, or the ability to vote, is a crucial component of our democracy.

Voting is a process that a group, such as an electorate or meeting, can use to reach a consensus or express an opinion, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Voting is how democracies choose their leaders for high office.

Learn more about Voting here:

https://brainly.com/question/29573892

#SPJ2

To provide legal advice to the public is to engage in Nonlawyer legal service providers' content that they are not engaging in UPL because they are providing legal information, not advice.

Lawyer As a popular matter, the most effective legal professionals might also provide real prison recommendations, whereas any non-lawyer can also recite legal statistics. furthermore, it's far typically unlawful for a non-lawyer or unlicensed attorney to provide a legal recommendation or in any other case represent someone aside from themself in court. that have an effect on the rights of someone, representing someone in a court docket of law or in a legal rely on, negotiating the rights of a customer.

The phrases legal professional and lawyer are frequently used interchangeably. for that reason, people inside and outside of the felony discipline often ask an attorney and a lawyer an equal thing. In colloquial speech, the specific requirements vital to be taken into consideration a lawyer vs lawyer are not constantly considered. felony recommendation applies the regulation, along with statute and case regulation and felony principles to a selected scenario.

Learn more about Legal advice here:-https://brainly.com/question/17494866

#SPJ9

If I were asked to write a new law aimed at addressing a significant local issue and to propose that law to the city council, I would use a persuasive question. A persuasive question is designed to convince the audience of a certain viewpoint or to take a specific action.  

To propose a new law aimed at addressing a significant local issue to the city council, you should draft a resolution outlining the proposed law, its purpose, and its expected impacts.

Your resolution should also include background information about the issue and how the proposed law will address it. You should then present your resolution to the city council for their consideration and potential adoption.

For example, if the local issue is a lack of affordable housing, I might ask the city council, "How can we ensure that all members of our community have access to safe and affordable housing?" This question highlights the importance of the issue and encourages the council to consider potential solutions.

Alternatively, if the local issue is related to environmental pollution, I might ask, "What steps can we take to reduce our community's carbon footprint and protect our natural resources?" This question emphasizes the need for action and encourages the council to consider potential laws or regulations that could address the issue.

Overall, the key to proposing a new law to the city council is to ask a question that highlights the importance of the issue and encourages the council to take action.

To know more about law refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/12469633#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Timothy may be required to compensate the Plaintiff.

This is because a civil litigation usually involves some type of compensation for injuries or damages as well as disposition of property and other disputes.

However, if a guilty defendant is punished by incarceration and/or fines, or in exceptional cases, the death penalty.

Answer:

There are several ways to get involved in human rights campaigns, including:

- Joining a human rights organization: There are many organizations that work on human rights issues, such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the American Civil Liberties Union. Joining one of these organizations can give you access to resources, events, and opportunities to take action on human rights issues.

- Educating yourself and others: Learning about human rights issues and sharing that knowledge with others can be a powerful way to raise awareness and promote change. You can read books, watch documentaries, attend lectures, and engage in discussions with others to deepen your understanding of human rights issues.

- Taking action: There are many ways to take action on human rights issues, depending on your interests and skills. You can write letters to elected officials, participate in protests and rallies, donate money to organizations working on human rights issues, and use social media to raise awareness and mobilize others.

Answer:

uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol

Answer: false

Explanation:

the statement is false as the EU is not a free trade area, nor a multilateral trade negotiation, but a customs union.

Under common law, negligence involves a failure to exercise reasonable care that results in harm to another person or property. In this scenario, Mike's actions leading up to the car accident demonstrate negligence, as he failed to slow down at an intersection despite indicating and checking his rear-view mirror.

As a result of the accident, Jenny suffered minor injuries. In an action of negligence against Mike, Jenny would need to demonstrate that Mike's negligence was the proximate cause of her injuries. Given the facts of the scenario, it seems likely that Mike's actions did cause the accident that led to Jenny's injuries. As such, Jenny may have a strong case against Mike for compensation for her injuries and any resulting damages.

Fancy Shoes, on the other hand, may have a more difficult case against Mike. The factory was forced to shut down for two days, resulting in inconvenience and some expense. However, in order to prove negligence on Mike's part, the factory would need to demonstrate that Mike's actions were the direct cause of the electricity outage and subsequent shutdown. It is possible that other factors, such as a problem with the electricity infrastructure, could have contributed to the outage. As such, it may be more difficult for Fancy Shoes to prove negligence on Mike's part and to claim compensation for their losses.

Read more on common law here:https://brainly.com/question/493036

#SPJ1

Answer:well its kina,hard ro explain my thought ands opinion on this but,as in diffrent genders could be a dif but not as well

Explanation:

The business judgment rule is a legal principle that gives executives and directors of a corporation a presumption of good faith and reasonableness in their business decisions, provided that they act in the best interests of the corporation and with a reasonable amount of care and diligence.

The business judgment rule states that if a director's actions can be proven to have been taken logically, a court will not pursue them. with good intentions. knowing they were acting in a way that was advantageous to the company.

The rule recognizes that business decisions often involve risks and uncertainties and that decision-makers should be allowed to exercise their judgment without undue interference or second-guessing.

In the case of Target's decision to allow individuals to use the restroom of the gender they identify with, it can be argued that the decision was made in the best interests of the corporation, as it reflects the company's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.

While the decision did result in a drop in stock prices, it is important to note that stock prices can be affected by a variety of factors beyond the control of the executives, such as market conditions, competition, and global events. Moreover, the long-term effects of the decision on the company's reputation and customer loyalty may offset the short-term drop in stock prices.

Learn more about the business Judgement rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/31194690

#SPJ2

Under the voting rights act of 1965, the federal government was given the power to review any changes to voting laws, specifically targeting to increase the number of voters who are registered in areas where discrimination has a history.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed by Congress with the goal of increasing the number of voters registered in areas where there had been a history of discrimination. The legislation prohibited literacy tests and authorized the appointment of Federal examiners in certain jurisdictions with a history of voter discrimination (and gave them the authority to register eligible citizens to vote).

The U.S. Attorney General or the District Court for Washington, DC had to give their "preclearance" before these jurisdictions could alter their voting practices or procedures. Through this law, the federal government acquired the authority to register voters previously held by state and local officials.

Since the Reconstruction era, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) marked the most significant statutory change in the relationship between the federal and state governments regarding voting. As such, it was immediately contested in court. The Supreme Court handed down a number of significant rulings upholding the legality of the law between 1965 and 1969.

The question is incomplete, complete question "under the voting rights act of 1965, the federal government was given the power to review any changes to voting laws, specifically targeting what factors?"

Learn more about Voting Rights Act at:

brainly.com/question/6826755

#SPJ4

Answer:

DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.

Explanation:

United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton - JamaicaIn the case of United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton, the issue at hand is unfair or wrongful dismissal or termination of contract. The IRAC method can be used to analyze this case.

1. Issue: The issue, in this case,  is whether the dismissal or termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract by United General Insurance Company Limited was unfair or wrongful.
2. Rule: In Jamaica, unfair or wrongful dismissal occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract without a valid reason or fails to follow proper procedures. The Employment (Termination and Redundancy Payments) Act provides protection to employees in such situations.
3. Application: In this case, it needs to be determined whether the termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract by United General Insurance Company Limited was done without a valid reason or if proper procedures were not followed.
4. Conclusion: Based on the available information, a direct answer to whether the dismissal or termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract was unfair or wrongful cannot be provided without further details about the case's specific circumstances. It would require a thorough examination of the facts, evidence, and legal arguments presented in the case.

The case of United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton involves the issue of unfair or wrongful dismissal or termination of a contract. To analyze this case using the IRAC method, we identify the issue, the relevant rule in Jamaica regarding unfair or wrongful dismissal, and apply the rule to the facts of the case. However, without specific details about the case's circumstances, it is impossible to provide a direct answer or conclusion regarding the fairness or wrongfulness of Marilyn Hamilton's dismissal. Further examination of the facts and legal arguments would be necessary to reach a conclusion in this case.

Tagging:

To know more about the IRAC method visit:

brainly.com/question/33477664

#SPJ11

The type of legal provision that allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect, is known as a release or a waiver.

A release or waiver is a legal clause that enables people to freely give up or abandon their claims against other people without expecting anything in return. This clause gives people the option to expressly waive their right to file a lawsuit or request compensation for a specific claim or incident in a written statement.

People acknowledge that they have voluntarily and knowingly chosen to waive their rights by signing a release or waiver which exonerates the other party from any liability or responsibility related to the claim. This legal tool is frequently employed in a variety of situations including liability waivers for taking part in particular activities or events, contract negotiations and personal injury settlements.

To know more about waiver here

brainly.com/question/31838925

#SPJ4

The complete question is "Which type of legal provision allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect?"

Answer:

What do you want me to do?

Answer:

The Law of Demand states that there is an indirect relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity of that good or service that consumers are willing and able to buy. In other words, as the price of an item increases, buyers are less willing and able to buy it and vice versa.

The law of demand is a fundamental economic principle that describes the relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity of that good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase. The law of demand states that, all other things being equal, the quantity demanded of a good or service will decrease as its price increases, and vice versa.

In other words, as the price of a good or service rises, consumers will tend to buy less of it, and as the price falls, they will tend to buy more. This relationship between price and quantity demanded is often illustrated graphically with a demand curve, which shows the quantity of a good or service that consumers are willing to buy at each price level.

There are a number of factors that can influence demand for a good or service besides its price, including changes in consumer tastes and preferences, changes in consumer income, the availability of substitutes, and changes in overall market conditions. However, the law of demand holds that, all other things being equal, price and quantity demanded are inversely related.

To know more about economic principle refer to-

brainly.com/question/17195696#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Human Capital

Explanation:

Human Capital means

the skills and knowledge gained by a worker through education and experience.

Answer:A use of force continuum is a standard that provides law enforcement officers and civilians with ... The purpose of these models is to clarify, both for law enforcement officers and civilians, the complex subject of use of force. ... noted that an officer need not progress through each level before reaching the final level of force.

Explanation:

Answer:

A defendant may be charged with solicitation if he or she requests or induces another person to commit an act that would amount to a felony.

Explanation:

The two elements of solicitation are the intent to have someone else commit a crime and an act committed in furtherance of convincing another person to commit a crime.

The reason the same event is sometimes reported differently by various news agencies is due to various factors including political beliefs, availability of information, misleading interests, and inaccurate reporting.

Below is a detailed explanation of each factor:

1. Political beliefs: News agencies can embrace certain political beliefs, which are reflected in the reporting. Some news agencies may be biased towards a particular political party or ideology, leading to differences in reporting. This can be a result of personal beliefs of the journalists or ownership interests.

2. Availability of information: Sometimes, journalists do not have enough information to accurately report on an event. This can lead to different reports from different news agencies. For example, one news agency may have more access to sources and therefore provide a more comprehensive report than another news agency.

3. Misleading interests: Some news agencies have strong interests in misleading their audiences, which can lead to inaccurate reporting. This may include sensationalizing stories, presenting false information, or presenting one-sided views of events.

4. Political parties pay some news agencies to make them look good, leading to inaccurate reporting. Some political parties may pay certain news agencies to present them in a favorable light, leading to biased reporting and inaccurate representation of events.

Learn more about political ideology at:

https://brainly.com/question/18702218

#SPJ11

Answer:

Enduring Minor Parties

Single-Issue Minor Parties.  

Candidate-Centered Minor Parties

Fusion Minor Parties.

Explanation:

CAN YOU MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST :)

many states have laws that prohibit smoking immediately outside an entrance, usually within 25-30 feet.

Over the years, improper use of smoking products (such as cigarettes, matches, and lighters), whether intentional or not, has caused a number of fires in medical facilities, some of which have resulted in serious injury and even death. Because of this, it's crucial to strictly regulate not only where smoking is permitted at your establishment but also who is allowed to smoke and when. To combat this, many establishments forbid the use of any tobacco products inside or on their premises. Smoking is prohibited near immediate entrance it is restricted 25-30 feet away. It helps in ensuring healthy lifestyle to people who don't smoke.

Know more about "smoking" visit

brainly.com/question/12705660

#SPJ4

The two main sources of law in Canada are: 1. Legislation and 2. Common Law.

The two main legal systems in Canada are: 1. Civil law and 2. Common law.What is law?Law refers to a set of rules and regulations that are developed and enforced by the government. It acts as a guide and a constraint on the behavior of individuals, businesses, and other organizations within a particular country. The legal system in Canada is based on both common law and civil law.

The sources of law in Canada Legislation: The Canadian parliament and the provincial and territorial legislatures create statutes, which are known as legislation. The legislative process for making a new law varies depending on whether the law will be created by the federal government or the provincial government. The legislative branch has the authority to create new laws, change existing laws or repeal them.Common Law: The common law system is based on judicial decisions made by judges in previous cases. Judges must consider previous decisions that have similar facts and issues to the case before them. Judges often rely on precedents, which are legal decisions made in previous cases. Common law decisions provide guidance to the lower courts on how to decide similar cases.

The legal systems in Canada Civil law system: Civil law is a legal system that emphasizes the written code. It is used in Quebec and other provinces and territories that have a significant French-speaking population. Civil law is based on written laws, and the judges interpret the law. The role of the judge is to determine the facts and apply the law to those facts.Common law system: Common law is a legal system that is based on judicial decisions. It is used in all other provinces and territories in Canada. In common law, judges must consider previous decisions that have similar facts and issues to the case before them. Judges often rely on precedents, which are legal decisions made in previous cases. Common law decisions provide guidance to the lower courts on how to decide similar cases.

to know more about Legislation visit
https://brainly.com/question/33629133
#SPJ11

Answer: A

Explanation:

Answer:

An alternative to imprisonment that he would use to reduce overcrowding in prisons would be the use of alternative penalties in cases of minor offenses: thus, for example, for crimes with prison sentences of less than 3 years, he would use other measures such as fines, plans education, community work, etc., thus reducing the number of people held in prisons provided that they do not represent an imminent danger to society, nor that the crime committed deserves a greater penalty.

Answer:

because they want to?!

Explanation: