In the United States, it should be noted that capitalism has always been the prevailing system. It is the economic system in which private individuals or businesses, rather than the government, own and control the factors of production
Communist countries, such as China, North Korea, and Cuba, typically tend toward socialism, while Western European countries favor capitalist economies and try to chart a middle course.
What is capitalism?Socialism and capitalism are two types of economic systems that nations use to control their means of production and manage their economic resources.
Socialism is based on government planning and restrictions on private control of resources, whereas capitalism is based on individual initiative and favors market mechanisms over government intervention.
When left to their own devices, economies frequently mix components from both systems. In contrast to nations like China and Vietnam, which may be moving closer to fully fledged market economies, capitalism has developed safety nets.
Learn more about capitalism on:
https://brainly.com/question/9267779
#SPJ1
Which nations gain superpower status after World War II
Answer:
The Soviet Union & The United States
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
Evaluate King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella's treatment of their subjects, who did not follow the religion of Catholicism.
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain were known for their strong devotion to Catholicism, which led them to launch the Spanish Inquisition in 1478. The Inquisition was aimed at identifying and punishing individuals who were suspected of practicing Judaism, Islam, or any other non-Catholic faith.
Those who refused to convert to Catholicism were often subjected to torture, imprisonment, and execution. The treatment of non-Catholics during this time was severe and intolerant. Many innocent people were falsely accused and punished, and the Inquisition created an atmosphere of fear and suspicion throughout the kingdom. Despite this, the monarchs believed that they were acting in the best interests of their subjects, and their actions were seen as a necessary means of preserving the unity and purity of the Catholic faith in Spain. Overall, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella's treatment of their non-Catholic subjects was characterized by religious intolerance and persecution. While their actions may have been motivated by their religious convictions, the Inquisition remains a dark chapter in Spanish history and a reminder of the dangers of religious extremism.
For more information suspicion see:
https://brainly.com/question/14808497
#SPJ1
the era of interregional strife that resulted after the first eight egyptian dynasties gave way to a period of upheaval, when local feudal lords upset the unity achieved by menes, was called the:
The era of interregional strife that followed the first eight Egyptian dynasties and was characterized by a period of upheaval caused by local feudal lords is known as the First Intermediate Period, the correct option is D.
The First Intermediate Period was a time of political and social upheaval in Ancient Egypt that followed the first eight Egyptian dynasties. It lasted from approximately 2181-2040 BCE and was characterized by the breakdown of central authority, the rise of regionalism, and the emergence of local feudal lords who challenged the authority of the pharaoh.
This period saw a decline in the power of the pharaohs and the unity of the Egyptian state, with many local rulers vying for control of territory and resources, the correct option is D.
To learn more about Egyptian dynasties follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2821047
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
What was the era of interregional strife that followed the first eight Egyptian dynasties and was characterized by a period of upheaval caused by local feudal lords?
A) The Old Kingdom
B) The Middle Kingdom
C) The New Kingdom
D) The First Intermediate Period
can one nation or empire ake over another nation without oppressing others? has imperialism becomemore or less oppressive as the world has become more industrialized?
It is possible for one nation or empire to take over another nation without oppressing others. In fact, it is possible to take over a nation without any oppression at all. However, most instances of imperialism have involved some level of oppression. Imperialism, as a system, is based on the idea that one country has the right to control the affairs of another country.
This often involves imposing the values, beliefs, and customs of the dominant country on the people of the country being controlled. This can be done through force, coercion, or manipulation. For example, in the late 19th century, European countries colonized many parts of Africa. They did so with the intention of exploiting the natural resources of the continent. In doing so, they imposed their own language, culture, and religion on the people of Africa. This was a form of oppression, as it denied the people of Africa the ability to develop their own language, culture, and religion. However, there have been some instances of imperialism that were less oppressive. For example, the United States acquired the territory of Alaska from Russia in 1867.
The people of Alaska were not oppressed, but they were not given the right to vote in U.S. elections. This was because the U.S. government did not believe that the people of Alaska were ready for democracy. In general, however, imperialism has been oppressive. As the world has become more industrialized, imperialism has become less oppressive. This is because industrialization has led to the development of more efficient means of communication and transportation. This has made it easier for people in different parts of the world to communicate with each other and to travel. As a result, people have become more aware of the world around them. This has led to increased pressure on imperial powers to treat their subject peoples more fairly.
To know more about empire visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32497385
#SPJ11
what was the role of religion in shaping ancient chinese society and culture in the tang dynasty from 607-904 ad?
Religion played a significant role in shaping ancient Chinese society and culture during the Tang Dynasty (607-904 AD). Buddhism, Daoism, and Confucianism were the major religious and philosophical systems that influenced various aspects of Chinese life.
During the Tang Dynasty, Buddhism experienced a surge in popularity and became a state-sponsored religion. Buddhist monasteries and temples were constructed, and Buddhist teachings and practices influenced art, literature, and social customs. Buddhism provided solace, moral guidance, and a sense of community for the people.
Daoism, with its emphasis on harmony with nature and the pursuit of immortality, also had a significant impact. It influenced Chinese medicine, cosmology, and the arts. Daoist practices such as meditation, alchemy, and feng shui were integrated into daily life.
Confucianism, while not a religion per se, played a crucial role in shaping the values and social structure of ancient Chinese society. Confucian teachings emphasized moral conduct, filial piety, and respect for authority. These values influenced education, government administration, and family relationships.
The integration of these three belief systems created a rich religious and philosophical landscape in ancient China, shaping the values, social norms, and cultural expressions of the Tang Dynasty.
Religion, particularly Buddhism, Daoism, and Confucianism, played a vital role in shaping ancient Chinese society and culture during the Tang Dynasty. These belief systems influenced various aspects of life, including art, literature, social structure, and governance.
To know more about Tang dynasty, visit:
brainly.com/question/1385299
#SPJ11
If a state law and a federal law give different rules about the same thing, which law is supreme? In article VI
Answer:
Supremacy clause of the Nation is supreme law of the land is described below in details.
Explanation:
The Supremacy article of the Constitution of the United States of America Article VI authenticates that the Constitution, the central legislature is prepared according to it, and agreements legislated under its jurisdiction, establish the "supreme Law of the Nation", and thus take superiority over any contradictory state laws.
5. Notice the large amount of red arrows all over the map. Over time, what do you think
would be the result of all these military campaigns?
Answer:
Representing the speed, agility and precision of the Royal Air Force, the team is the public face of the service. They assist in recruiting to the Armed Forces, act as ambassadors for the United Kingdom at home and overseas and promote the best of British.
The Constitution was signed on __________. A. December 30, 1865 B. July 4, 1776 C. April 27, 1788 D. September 17, 1787
Option D : September 17 1787
Answer:
D
Explanation:
How did slaves living near the train depot react to the departure of the slaves who had been sold?
Answer:
The feelings ranged across many different reactions. Perhaps the most common individual response to enslavement was sluggishness, passivity, and indifference.
Explanation:
compare and contrast the actions and policies of maria theresa and of frederick ii.
Maria Theresa and Frederick II were two powerful rulers who reigned in the 18th century. While they both had significant impacts on their respective countries, their actions and policies were quite different.
Maria Theresa was the Queen of Hungary and Bohemia and the Archduchess of Austria. She was known for her strong leadership and her efforts to modernize her empire. Maria Theresa implemented many reforms, including the establishment of a centralized bureaucracy, the introduction of a modern tax system, and the creation of a standing army. She also promoted education and the arts, and she worked to improve the lives of her subjects.
Learn more about Maria Theresa
https://brainly.com/question/8419580
#SPJ4
The Iraq War is a subject of much debate. In the space below, construct a claim that supports or refutes the decision to invade Iraq. Your claim should be at least 250-words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the Iraq War
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning the decision to invade Iraq.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state whether or not the U.S. should have invade Iraq.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source, and information from the lesson, that supports it.
You should have a counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and create cohesion between claims and evidence
Follows expectations of conventions
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Claim: The decision to invade Iraq by the United States was unjustified and should not have been undertaken.
Lack of substantial evidence: Despite claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the presence of such weapons was not conclusively proven, as stated by intelligence reports and subsequent investigations.Questionable motives: Some argue that the invasion was driven by geopolitical interests and a desire for control over Iraq's oil resources rather than genuine concerns for national security or democracy promotion.Destabilization of the region: The invasion led to a power vacuum, contributing to sectarian violence, the rise of extremist groups, and regional instability, rather than achieving stability and peace as intended.Humanitarian and economic costs: The war resulted in significant loss of civilian lives, military casualties, and financial burdens, diverting resources from pressing domestic needs and contributing to long-lasting consequences for the Iraqi population.Counterclaim: The invasion was necessary to remove a dangerous regime and promote democracy.Conclusion: Considering the lack of substantial evidence for WMDs, questionable motives, destabilization of the region, and the human and economic costs incurred, it can be argued that the decision to invade Iraq was unwarranted and should not have been pursued.For more such question on invade Iraq
https://brainly.com/question/26172813
#SPJ8
Plenty help me with these questions and I need to submit these today!
Explanation:
The question for one is b ^-^
what type of verb is the bold word?
Little by little, the sky became cloudy.
helping
linking
action
Why is mr Ellsworth for leaving the clause as it stands
Mr. Ellsworth could never agree to the clause as it stands. He would sooner risk the Constitution. He dwelt on the dilemma to which the Convention was exposed. By agreeing to the clause, it would revolt against the Quakers, the Methodists, and many others in the States having no slaves.
Phrases create complete thoughts (ideas or statements that stand on their own). A complete thought is also known as a principal or subordinate clause (IC). Example Phrases: Subject + Verb = Complete Thought (IC) A simple sentence consists minimally of a predicate and its dependent core arguments, but can be extended with diagonal modifiers. Core arguments are usually nominals, and distorted modifiers are either (distorted) nominals or adverbial modifiers.
There are three main types of subordinate clauses: relatives, nouns and adverbs. A relative clause is an adjective clause that describes a noun. It's important to remember that relative clauses are not a complete idea! They are used in sentences to further describe nouns. Sentences are the actual building blocks of sentences, sometimes forming complete sentences by themselves. All sentences contain at least one clause, but not all clauses form a complete sentence. Each sentence has its own subject and predicate (verb or verb phrase) and possibly other modifiers.
Learn more about the clause here
https://brainly.com/question/20483456
#SPJ9
During the campaigns in the Caucasus and eastern Anatolia, Turkish military maneuvers deliberately caused:
a. the destruction of naval access to the Aral Sea
b. the deviation of Russian troops to the southern regions off the Eastern line
c. forced death march of hundreds of thousands of Armenians
d. a confrontation with Italian troops who had not honored their part of the Triple Alliance
e. suppression of secularization within the Turkish state
The Turkish military maneuvers caused the forced death march of hundreds of thousands of Armenians, option (c) is correct.
The campaigns in the Caucasus and eastern Anatolia during World War I resulted in the Armenian Genocide, where the Turkish military deliberately caused the forced death march of hundreds of thousands of Armenians. The Ottoman Empire, seeking to eliminate the Armenian population, implemented a systematic and organized campaign of deportation and mass killings.
Armenian civilians were forcibly marched to remote locations without adequate food, water, or shelter, resulting in widespread death and suffering. Scholars, historians, and international bodies, including many countries and organizations, have recognized and condemned these events as genocide. The Armenian Genocide remains a significant and deeply tragic chapter in history, with lasting consequences for the Armenian people and their collective memory, option (c) is correct.
To learn more about Turkish follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2793588
#SPJ4
How did trade along the Silk Road contribute to employment?
Traders hired more craftspeople to build vehicles for caravans.
Businesses hired more people to make enough goods to trade.
Governments hired more workers to collect taxes from traders.
Caravans hired more soldiers to protect traders during the journey.
The Silk Road was a vast network of trade routes that connected China to the Mediterranean. The trade along the Silk Road contributed to employment in several ways.Businesses hired more people to make enough goods to trade.
The traders employed more craftspeople to build vehicles for caravans, and businesses hired more people to make enough goods to trade. The business of transporting goods from one point to another required the hiring of drivers, porters, and guards, all of whom were essential to ensure that the goods made it safely to their destination.
As a result, this created a large number of employment opportunities for the people living along the Silk Road.Caravans hired more soldiers to protect traders during the journey.The caravans hired more soldiers to protect the traders during the journey.
This is because the Silk Road was not entirely safe, and there were robbers and bandits along the way who would try to steal the goods. Therefore, hiring more soldiers was essential for the protection of the traders and the goods they were transporting.
Governments hired more workers to collect taxes from traders.Governments hired more workers to collect taxes from traders. As the Silk Road was a significant source of revenue for the governments, it was essential to ensure that they collected taxes from the traders.
Therefore, more workers were hired to collect taxes from the traders as they passed through various regions.The trade along the Silk Road contributed significantly to employment and played a vital role in the economic development of the regions that it passed through.
For more question on trade
https://brainly.com/question/14926566
#SPJ8
State a strong reason about the legislative branch that supports your thesis: Does the check/balance work? How much or little does the legislative branch check and balance the other branches?
Answer:
The Constitution nowhere contains an express injunction to preserve the boundaries of the three broad powers it grants, nor does it expressly enjoin maintenance of a system of checks and balances. Yet, it does grant to three separate branches the powers to legislate, to execute, and to adjudicate, and it provides throughout the document the means by which each of the branches could resist the blandishments and incursions of the others. The Framers drew up our basic charter against a background rich in the theorizing of scholars and statesmen regarding the proper ordering in a system of government of conferring sufficient power to govern while withholding the ability to abridge the liberties of the governed.1
The Theory
Which fact, left out of this account, most clearly suggests that the account is
biased?
Evidence shows that the number of deer in our state parks has gotten
out of control. Our wise governor supported the law against hunting,
and now we're paying the price.
OA. The governor supported the law, but the law was passed before
she became governor.
B. The number of deer in the state grew from 225,000 in 2020 to
almost 300,000 in 2021.
OC. A male deer's antlers are used to wrestle with other male deer and
to defend against predators.
D. Deer are a major cause of traffic accidents, especially when they
wander into communities.
The fact that is left out of this account, and most clearly suggests bias, is option A. The governor supported the law, but the law was passed before she became governor.
By omitting this crucial piece of information, the account creates a biased narrative that blames the governor for the perceived problem of the increasing number of deer in state parks. The statement implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the governor's support of the law against hunting and the current situation, suggesting that her actions directly led to the "price" the state is now paying.
However, if it were mentioned that the law was already in place before the governor assumed office, it would provide a different context and undermine the implicit criticism of the governor's decision. It would highlight that the governor's support of the existing law was not the direct cause of the perceived problem, as she did not have control over its enactment.
Including this omitted information would present a more balanced account, allowing readers to consider other factors that may have contributed to the increase in the deer population. It would encourage a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and prevent the reader from forming a biased judgment solely based on the information provided. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
know more about judgment here:
https://brainly.com/question/730438
#SPJ8
During solons time, which of the following was denied to the lowest class of Athenian citizens?
A the right to vote
B the right to accuse wrongdoers
C the right to sit on juries
D the right to hold public office
During solons time the lowest class of Athenian citizens was denied the right to hold public office. Option D
What was the Solonian constitutionThe Solonian constitution was created by Solon in the early 6th century BC. Prior to that time of Solon, the Athenian State was almost falling to pieces that led to outcome of disagreement between the parties into which the population was divided.
Solon abolished the older laws of Draco by freeing all the debt-slaves . He disseminated a code of laws embracing the whole of public and private life,
Citizens were also diverged according to their land production. The lower class was given the right to hear appeals, and the right to accuse wrongdoers but was denied the right to hold public office.
Solon also created the higher assembly. Both of these were meant to decrease the power of the aristocratic council.
Learn more The Solonian constitution on brainly.com/question/4355332
#SPJ1
HELP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE please
In conclusion Architectural Design, Artistic Style, Democracy, and Literature and Philosophy these are the some of points how this building influenced the western civilization.
What are the points ?
Architectural Design: The Parthenon's architectural design, which includes a post-and-lintel system, the use of columns, and the concept of symmetry, has been imitated in many important buildings throughout history, including the U.S. Capitol building, the White House, and numerous government buildings in Western Europe.
Artistic Style: The art and sculpture of the Parthenon, particularly the frieze depicting the Panathenaic procession, have been recognized as some of the finest examples of classical Greek art.
Democracy: The Parthenon was built during a time when Athens was a democracy, and its construction was a symbol of Athenian pride and democratic ideals. These ideals have influenced the development of democracy throughout Western civilization, from the founding of the United States to modern European democracies.
Literature and Philosophy: The Parthenon and its surrounding Acropolis have been referenced in countless works of literature, including those of Shakespeare and Lord Byron.
To know more about Parthenon related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20899533
#SPJ1
How did the rise of a military Society bring order to Japan? right three to five sentences
Answer:
The rise of the samurai and warlords caused the Japanese society to change because the central government lost its ability to govern the lands controlled by the military. The military thus controlled the flow of goods and taxes throughout their estates and slowly cut off the emperor and his central government.
Explanation:
Why were the farmers and settlers especially likely to support the war of 1812?
Answer:
They were the ones hurt the most by the Native American attacks and British blockade.
Explanation:
The British impressed US sailors, and supported Native American attacks on American settlers.
i need help asap!!! someone pls give me the answer
One political tension created between the South and the North through the Missouri Compromise was that Congress refused to admit any new slave states to the Union, as Option B shows.
What was the Missouri Compromise?It was an agreement between the southern and northern states.It was the agreement that allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state.The Missouri Compromise determined the limits of slavery in the USA, considering the geographic location between the states.
Although this commitment was intended to reduce tension between Southerners and Northerners, this tension increased because Congress did not admit new slave states, which strengthened the union and disfavored the confederation.
Learn more about the Missouri Commitment:
https://brainly.com/question/14020956
#SPJ1
What did southerners fear would be a result of Nat Turner's rebellion?
A. The state militia would not be able to stop another rebellion.
B. Small plantation owners would get rid of their enslaved people.
C. Other enslaved people would follow Turner's example and rebel.
D. Congress would end slavery in southern states.
Other enslaved people would follow Turner's example and rebel was the fear of the Southerners.
Nat Turner's rebellion resulted in the enactment of a slew of new laws. The Virginia legislature debated abolishing slavery, but instead chose to impose additional restrictions and harsher penalties on both enslaved and free African Americans.
Turner claimed that he had been chosen by God to lead the rebellion. Turner's divine message to return to his master was not the last he claimed to have received from God. He allegedly confessed to Gray that he had received divine visions to avenge slavery and free his fellow enslaved people.
To know more about Nat Turner's rebellion here
https://brainly.com/question/11550392
#SPJ1
Answer:other enslaved people would follow turners example and rebel
Explanation:other enslaved people would follow turners example and rebel
2. Explain about Patola,
Answer:
Explanation: Patola is a double ikat woven sari, usually made from silk, made in Patan, Gujarat, India. The word patola is the plural form; the singular is patolu. They are very expensive, once worn only by those belonging to royal and aristocratic families. ... Patola-weaving is a closely guarded family tradition.
1. how does the relief of christ and disciples on the road to emmaus manifest the emergence of romanesque style?
The relief of Christ and Disciples on the Road to Emmaus demonstrates the emergence of Romanesque style through its balanced composition, stylized figures, relief depth, biblical iconography, and the interaction of figures.
The relief of Christ and Disciples on the Road to Emmaus manifests the emergence of Romanesque style through several key features:
1. Composition: Romanesque art typically displays a balanced composition, as seen in this relief where Christ and the disciples are symmetrically arranged around a central axis.
2. Stylization: Romanesque style is known for its stylized figures, which can be observed in the elongated bodies and expressive facial features of Christ and the disciples in this relief.
3. Relief depth: Romanesque reliefs often exhibit a moderate depth, which is evident in the carving of this artwork, allowing the figures to stand out against the background while still remaining somewhat flat.
4. Iconography: The Romanesque style often includes biblical themes and narratives, as demonstrated by the subject matter of this relief, which depicts a key event in Christian theology.
5. Interaction of figures: Romanesque art frequently showcases interaction between figures, as seen in this relief, where the disciples engage with Christ and each other, illustrating a sense of narrative and emotional connection.
Learn more about Romanesque:
https://brainly.com/question/30242743
#SPJ11
the quartering act required that colonists a. provide housing and food for british soldiers. b. ship all of their export goods through england. c. pay one quarter of their income to the british crown. d. try those accused of theft in admiralty courts.
Answer the following question using 8-10 thoughtful,
university-level sentences each.
2. What is Manifest Destiny
and why is it an important concept in understanding American
frontier history?
Manifest Destiny is the belief and ideology that emerged in the 19th century in the United States. It asserts that it was the nation's destiny and inherent right to expand its territorial boundaries from coast to coast. It was fueled by cultural, economic, and political factors, reflecting American exceptionalism. It also reflected the desire for territorial expansion.
This concept is crucial in understanding American frontier history. This is because it shaped the nation's expansionist policies and influenced politicians, settlers, and pioneers. Manifest Destiny justified the annexation of newly acquired territories, such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Texas acquisition, and the territorial gains from the Mexican-American War.
Furthermore, belief in Manifest Destiny led to the exploration and settlement of the western frontier. This was done by individuals and families seeking new opportunities, fertile lands, and economic prosperity. It played a significant role in the migration patterns and development of the American West, as it encouraged westward movement and the establishment of new towns, cities, and industries.
Moreover, Manifest Destiny ideology also had profound implications for Native American tribes and their displacement. The pursuit of territorial expansion often involved displacement, forced removal, as well as violent conflicts with indigenous peoples, as the American settlers believed it was their divine mission to occupy and "civilize" the land.
In summary, Manifest Destiny was a powerful and influential concept in American frontier history. It drove the nation's territorial expansion, influenced settlement patterns, and had far-reaching consequences for both settlers and Native Americans. Understanding this concept is essential for comprehending the motivations, actions, and conflicts that shaped the development of the United States. This is as it expanded its boundaries and solidified its identity as a continental nation.
Manifest Destiny is a term used to refer to the belief held by Americans in the 19th century that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America.
The concept of Manifest Destiny is significant for American frontier history as it is a term that refers to the set of beliefs that drove the push westward in the United States. Manifest Destiny was a key factor in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.
In conclusion, Manifest Destiny was an important concept in American frontier history as it fueled a period of territorial expansion and helped to shape the American identity. The concept of Manifest Destiny was based on the belief that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America. This idea played a significant role in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.
The idea of Manifest Destiny also contributed to the concept of the American frontier, which was a central theme in American history during the 19th century. It played a role in the belief in American exceptionalism and contributed to the belief that the United States was destined to become a world power.
Comparing and Contrasting Assume that Alberto Ortiz owns 1,000 acres of farmland. If he plants 100% of his acreage in coffee, he will realize $15,000 at $15 per acre. If he diversifies, planting 600 acres in coffee, 200 acres in sugarcane, and 200 acres in soybeans, he will realize $11,600, as shown on the circle chart.
Now assume that, the following year, the price of coffee drops 40%, the price of sugarcane stays even, and the price of soybeans rises 50%. Calculate the difference in Ortiz’s earnings, depending on whether he devotes all his land to coffee or whether he diversifies, planting the three crops in the proportions shown in the chart. Compare and contrast Ortega’s shortfall in these two situations.
Coffee ($15 per acre) Sugarcane ($7 per acre) Soybeans ($6 per acre)
If Alberto Ortiz devotes all 1,000 acres to coffee, his earnings will be $15,000 (1,000 acres x $15 per acre).
How do you determine the above?If he diversifies and plants 600 acres in coffee, 200 acres in sugarcane, and 200 acres in soybeans, his earnings will be $11,600 (600 x $15 + 200 x $7 + 200 x $6).
The following year, the price of coffee drops 40% to $9 per acre. With all 1,000 acres devoted to coffee, Alberto's total earnings would be $9,000 (1,000 x $9).
If he diversifies and plants 600 acres in coffee, 200 acres in sugarcane, and 200 acres in soybeans, the price of sugarcane stays even at $7 per acre and the price of soybeans rises 50% to $9 per acre. Alberto's earnings will be $9,600 (600 x $9 + 200 x $7 + 200 x $9).
In the first scenario, if he devotes all land to coffee, Alberto's shortfall would be $6,000 (15,000-9,000).
In the second scenario, if he diversifies and plants the three crops in the proportions shown in the chart, his shortfall would be $2,000 (11,600-9,600).
To know more about total earnings visit:
brainly.com/question/17514257
#SPJ1
How did Austria's alliance system influence Austria's decision to send Serbia an ultimatum?
Answer:
Austria sent Serbia a sweeping ultimatum that they new Serbia leaders would refuse to honor to provoke war. ... France was drawn into the war because it supported its ally Russia. Though French leaders had some doubts, they gave Russia the same kind of backing Germany offered to Austria.
Explanation: