Read the excerpt from an adaptation of "To Build a Fire.”

Now, high up in the tree, a bough capsized its load of snow; this fell on the boughs beneath, growing like an avalanche, until it descended without warning upon the man and the fire, and the fire was blotted out!

What statement best describes the point of view of this excerpt?

It is a first-person point of view, and the dog is the narrator.
It is a first-person point of view, and the man is the narrator.
It is a third-person limited point of view that presents the facts of the story.
It is a third-person omniscient point of view that reveals thoughts and fears.
WHO EVER GETS THIS I WILL GIVE A BRAINLYIST (sorry if i spellt it wrong )

Answer: D. The individual should work to get rid of all government.

Explanation:

Individualism is an ideology which states that one should be self reliant and independent and shouldn't depend on the state.

United States is regarded as an individualistic nation because an average American is simply likely to be noted concerned with himself or herself over a group.

Based on the scenario explained above, the correct answer will be that the individual should work to get rid of all government.

Answer:

Okay so get in the car and drive to the bank. If you dont have a car then get an uber. And if you dont have money for an uber than walk. If you cant walk then I dont know what else to tell you

Explanation:

Your welcome

The assignment wants to analyze your writing ability and your understanding of Snider's arguments. In that case, I can't write the essay, but I'll show you how to write it.

Below you can see an example of how the introduction should be done.

Terra Snider is the co-founder of the movement known as Start School Later, which unites parents, teachers, and students in advocating a good relationship between sleep and study for middle and high school students.

Learn more about writing an essay:

https://brainly.com/question/683722

#SPJ1

We can see here that the main characteristics of the Romantic Period are:

Romantic period is actually known to be a period that was seen in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that revolted against the Neoclassicism of the previous centuries. The term "romantic" was first used used by German poet Friedrich Schlegel. He defined romanticism as "literature depicting emotional matter in an imaginative form."

We see here that the selected characteristics above tells us about the romantic period. It was a period where nationalism and individualism were embraced.

Learn more about romantic period on https://brainly.com/question/25652231

#SPJ1

Answer:

I'm assuming that you are referring to the novel "The Bean Trees" by Barbara Kingsolver. In the novel, Esperanza is a young woman who is seeking refuge in the United States after escaping from her abusive husband in Guatemala. Esperanza cries so hard and seems so renewed after the papers were signed because it was a moment of relief for her.

The papers that were signed refer to the legal documents that would grant her asylum in the United States. This is a significant moment for Esperanza because it means that she will be able to start a new life without the fear of being deported or sent back to her abusive husband.

Esperanza had been living in fear for a long time, and the uncertainty of her situation had taken a toll on her. Signing the papers meant that she could finally have some peace of mind and start to rebuild her life. The moment was also a significant milestone in her journey toward self-discovery and independence.

In conclusion, Esperanza cried so hard and seemed so renewed after the papers were signed because it was a moment of relief and hope for her. It marked the beginning of a new chapter in her life, one where she could start to heal and move forward.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!! Have a good day/night!!

Answer:

Yes, Mandisa is correct in saying that Mxolisi is a product of his own environment.

Explanation:

Mother to Mother is a book based on real life event happened back in 1993. The book is written by Sindiwe Magona. Amy Biehl was killed a few yards away from her home. She came to South Africa to study. She was murdered by Mxolisi, the narrator's son. The book is written in epistolary form by Mandisa to Amy's mother.

Mandisa is correct in saying that her son, Mxolisi is a product of his own environment. Mxolisi himself chose the environment where people, who radicalized him before the crime were the same who shamed him after the crime. Mxolisi joined the Young Lions group, who was responsible for circling The Girl's car, which led Mxolisi to murder her.

Mandisa is partly correct in saying that Mxolisi is a product of his own environment. Her statement is supported by the fact that Mxolisi's environment has shaped his experiences and his beliefs.

For example, the fact that he grew up in a violent community has made him more likely to use violence himself. Additionally, the fact that he was raised by a single mother has made him more likely to take on traditional masculine roles.

However, Mandisa's statement is not entirely accurate. It is important to remember that Mxolisi is also an individual with his own unique thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

He is not simply a product of his environment, and he has the ability to make his own choices and shape his own destiny.

Ultimately, whether or not Mandisa is correct in saying that Mxolisi is a product of his own environment is a matter of opinion. There is no easy answer, and the truth is likely somewhere in between.

To know more about Mxolisi:

https://brainly.com/question/28603804

#SPJ3

Answer: There’s an old cliche that says, “Money can’t buy happiness.” But is that actually true? There’s research to suggest that, up until a certain income level, money certainly can have a positive impact on your happiness. In this article, we’re going to dive into some of the arguments on both sides of the debate.

Is it true that money can’t buy happiness? When it comes to the question of whether money can buy happiness, there’s a lot of research out there. The frustrating but true answer is: It depends. Money is a tool. If you use it correctly, it can absolutely have an impact on your happiness.

But it doesn’t necessarily increase our happiness in the ways you might expect it to. More money isn’t going to improve your mindset, and buying more stuff won’t really bring you more joy.

But money can also buy things like time and experiences which no doubt bring us happiness. It’s also a leading cause of stress (including debt stress) — stress that can be alleviated when we make enough to live comfortably.

Ways in which money can’t buy happiness

That old saying about money not being able to buy happiness has been around so along for a reason. Money can’t fix everything, and there are certainly ways that more money won’t lead to more happiness.

Money can’t change your mindset Your mindset has a significant impact on your happiness, and it’s something that money can’t fix. If you’re a glass-half-empty person without a lot of money, chances are that your mindset will be similar even once you have money.

Money can’t buy relationships, relationships are the most consistent predictor of happiness. When we have people in our lives who we love, we’re more likely to be happy. And ultimately, that’s something that money can’t buy.

Sure, there might be people who want to spend time with you because you have a lot of money. But those won’t be genuine relationships, and they aren’t likely to bring lasting happiness.

Material things don’t make us happy, when we get more money, perhaps as a gift or from a raise at work, many of us immediately jump to thinking about the material possessions we can buy. But those possessions don’t do much to increase our happiness.

Plenty of people have nice clothes or drive nice cars but still aren’t happy. In fact, many people use shopping as an escape when they’re unhappy, thinking it will increase their happiness. But ultimately, it doesn’t work.

You could certainly make the argument that money itself doesn’t make people happy. But there’s plenty of research that shows that when spent on the right things, money can have a dramatic impact on your happiness.

So it’s no surprise that having more money — at least enough to live comfortably and get out of the paycheck cycle — can reduce stress. And when people have less stress in their lives, they can focus on the things that make them happy.

Money can't buy happiness but it can lead you to it!

There are plenty of good points on both sides of the argument of whether money can buy happiness. Sure, the money itself doesn’t make you happy. And buying more possessions likely won’t either. But money is a tool. And when used properly, it can absolutely help you to reach financial goals that make you happier.

For some, that happiness looks like more time with family. For others, it’s simply the stress relief that comes with knowing you don’t have to worry about being late on your bills. It’s not the money that makes you happy — it’s how you use it.

Explanation:

Answer and Explanation:

The person I want to describe is my mother. She does not have a formal job, but takes care of the home and family like no one else. My mother is very dedicated to making the house comfortable for the whole family and she is always fulfilling all our wishes. She says that she is passionate about it and that she is happy if we feel happy with the environment. I wish she had more time for her, but she says that is her duty. I always associate my mother with a call of comfort and calm, where I can have total freedom, like my room, for example. She has no annoying features, except during board games where she likes to cheat, but it is not out of malice. My mother means the greatest symbol of kindness and dedication that I can have, I hope she is very happy.

Answer:

The correct word to fill in the blank is "around".

Explanation:

My mother lives just around the corner from me.

Answer/Letter:

Dear Uncle,

I hope this letter finds you in good health and spirits. I know you must be very worried about me, but I want to assure you that I am safe and well. I have been staying with the Indians who rescued me from the river, and they have been very kind and generous to me. They have treated me like one of their own, and I have learned a lot from them.

You may wonder why I did not return to you as soon as possible, but let me explain what happened. You remember that day when we were crossing the rapids in our canoe, and how the water was so rough and swift. I was holding on to the side of the canoe, but a big wave hit us and knocked me overboard. I tried to swim back to you, but the current was too strong and dragged me away. I thought I was going to drown, but then I saw a canoe coming towards me. It was the Indians who live on the other side of the river. They saw me struggling in the water and came to help me. They pulled me into their canoe and brought me to their village.

They gave me dry clothes and a warm blanket. They fed me and tended to my wounds. They made me feel welcome and comfortable. They did not ask for anything in return. They are not savages or thieves, as some people say. They are good and noble people, who respect nature and each other. They have a rich culture and history, which they have shared with me. They have taught me their language and customs, their songs and stories, their crafts and skills. They have shown me their fields and forests, their animals and plants, their ceremonies and celebrations. They have become my friends.

I know you may not understand or approve of my decision, but I have chosen to stay with them for a while longer. I want to learn more from them and experience their way of life. I also want to show them my gratitude and appreciation for saving my life. They have offered to take me back to you whenever I wish, but they have also invited me to join their tribe if I want to. They have given me a new name: Singing Bird. They say it suits me because I have a sweet voice and a cheerful spirit.

Please do not be angry or disappointed with me, Uncle. I love you and I miss you, but I also feel a connection with these people and this place. I hope you can respect my choice and trust my judgment. I am not in any danger or trouble here. On the contrary, I am happy and fulfilled. I hope you can be happy for me too.

I will write to you again soon, and let you know how I am doing. Maybe one day you can come and visit me here, and see for yourself how wonderful these Indians are. Until then, please take care of yourself and do not worry about me.

Your loving niece,

Caroline (Singing Bird)

Answer: C) Ronnie appears so sweet and kind in public, but she can be difficult at times.

Explanation: I know this is 100% right! Mark me the brainiest plz!

Answer:

C

Explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

None of the answers appear to be logical, because at the end of year 1 the stock value would be f(1)=102(0.98)^1=99.96≈100

the value of stock decreases by 2% per year

the initial amount of stock is worth 102

An essay or article's thesis statement is a succinct paragraph that captures the primary point of the work. It often appears near the end of your introduction.

Your thesis statement, which should concisely summarize the topic of your work, can help you reduce your topic selection. If you're writing a seven to ten page essay about hunger, for instance, you can claim that the issue has a number of causes and effects.

The statement that is mentioned in the essay's or paper's introduction that primarily aims to expose the paper's main idea or assertion about a particular topic is known as the thesis statement. It aims to give the paper direction and get the audience ready for the upcoming content.

To know more about thesis statement visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1577362

#SPJ1

Answer:

The main differences between an Orthodox synagogue and a Reform synagogue is that men and women are allowed to sit together in a Reform synagogue, whereas they must sit apart in an Orthodox synagogue. Reform Jews also allow the ordination of women, which is a practice that is not permitted by Orthodox Jews.

Explanation:

When a survey item implies a preferred response within the wording of the question itself it is called a leading question.

Thus the correct answer is B.

Learn more about question here: https://brainly.com/question/2976377

#SPJ4

The sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" indicates that Bob has negative feelings or emotions toward consuming junk food. Therefore, the appropriate word to complete the sentence is "hates."

Resenting something means feeling bitterness, anger, or frustration toward it. In this case, Bob experiences these negative emotions towards eating junk food. The use of the word "resents" implies that Bob has a strong aversion or dislike towards this type of food.

While it is possible for someone to enjoy, love, or admit to eating junk food, these options do not accurately reflect the negative sentiment expressed in the sentence. Enjoying or loving junk food would indicate a positive or pleasurable association with it, which contradicts the notion of resentment. Similarly, admitting to eating junk food does not necessarily capture the negative emotions associated with it.

By using the word "resents," the sentence conveys Bob's disapproval or dissatisfaction with consuming unhealthy food choices. It suggests that Bob may have concerns about the impact of junk food on his health, well-being, or personal goals.

In conclusion, the word that best completes the sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" is "hates," as it accurately reflects the negative emotions and aversion towards consuming unhealthy food.

Know more about junk food here:
https://brainly.com/question/4136688

#SPJ8

This question is missing the excerpt. I've found it online. It is as follows:

Read the excerpt from The Time Traveler's Guide to Elizabethan England.

If you are hungry, you might feel inclined to turn to poaching. But be careful: this is risky. Taking livestock is theft, and theft is a felony which carries the death sentence. Killing wild animals that live on another man's land is also against the law; even taking a single fish from a river can result in a fine of a shilling or more. It is unlikely that you will be hanged for taking a wild animal such as a rabbit; but, even so, you will get a fine amounting to three times the value of the animal as well as three months in prison, and you will have to enter into a bond to guarantee your good behavior in the future; a second offense will be treated more harshly. If a gamekeeper attacks you and you defend yourself, you can be charged with assault. You may find yourself on the gallows if you injure him.

Answer:

The detail from the text that best supports the inference that farm animals were very valuable in Elizabethan England is:

Taking livestock is theft, and theft is a felony which carries the death sentence.

Explanation:

Animals are still valuable, and if you try to steal someone's animal today and get caught, there will certainly be consequences. However, you will definitely not be sentenced to death for that.

In Elizabethan England, animals were just so valuable that people could lose their lives for trying to steal them. Think about it. In the US, for instance, not all states have the death penalty. Those that do have quite a high standard to judge someone so harshly. To get the death penalty, you will have need to have done someone horrific, such as taking the life of another human being. In Elizabethan England, you could get it for animal theft which, when we make the comparison to today's standards, shows how precious animals were.

Answer: A. The detail from the text that best supports the inference that farm animals were very valuable in Elizabethan England is:

Taking livestock is theft, and theft is a felony which carries the death sentence.

:

Answer:

1. Bought

2. Sells

3. return

4. Kept

5. Is

6. Exchange

7. pay

Answer:

The feud between the Capulets and Montagues is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet because it impeded their love for each other, as they choose death over being forced apart. Without the feud, they would likely have no barrier to being together.

C. The narrator is bored with life, and this influences his decision to let the stranger into his flat.

Generally, "Bored with life" means feeling uninterested, unchallenged, and unmotivated by one's current circumstances or experiences, leading to a lack of enthusiasm and excitement about life.

It can also refer to a sense of being stuck in a routine, feeling like there is nothing new or interesting to experience.

Read more about narrator

https://brainly.com/question/17415359

#SPJ1

Answer:

has changed

were

didn't have

weren't

paid

did

were

have changed

have become

created

have become

have also got

started

have envolved

Explanation:

Answer: 2. They are unrealistic and are therefore unachievable.

Explanation:

Harold Marshall begins this speech by stating that he does have any idealistic promises that will magically fix the city. He states that he is simply a normal citizen and like the rest of the people has heard those promises before from previous mayoral candidates.

Explaining why he does not have such promises for the people, he states that every mayor that has promised them has receded into the annals of history without taking them any closer to the goals they promised. This paints a picture of a man who believes that those goals were unrealistic and by extension unachievable.

Answer:

It's answer 2

Explanation:

I'm studying this exam with my teacher and she give me the answer :), hope this helps for others

Answer:

A. Threatened.

Explanation:

Vulnerable is the chance to become threatened.

Safe is self explanatory.

Extinct is completely eradicated.

Hope this helps out. Best of luck on your work.

Answer:

I hope this helps you.

Explanation:

1. It never changes the mood of the story. Happy time= sunny sky. Sad time=rain suddenly appears. Change of season=new part of the story.

2. It makes the story seem unappealing and static.

3. It is unrealistic-people are constantly on the move.

Answer: AnNyEoNgHaSeYo ㅋㅋ

Explanation:

From this, it can be inferred that sometimes people can show affection even when they are not with the ones they love.

In this passage, Oren’s grandfather shows his affection and openness to Oren by leaving the door of his cabin unlocked and telling Oren to come in and eat, even though he would not be there.

From this, it can be inferred that sometimes people can show affection even when they are not with the ones they love. Often times, when people are apart from their loved ones, they tend to forget about them and move on to the next thing they are focused on, but in this case, Oren’s grandfather showed affection by allowing him to enter the cabin and eat from the fridge, even though he was not there.

This shows that people can be affectionate even when they are not with their loved ones. Therefore, it is important to note that one does not need to be physically present to show love and affection for someone.

There are many ways to show love and affection, even when one is not physically there. This means that one can always maintain a relationship with their loved ones, regardless of the distance.

For more such questions on affection, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30672478

#SPJ8

Answer: In his famous play "The Picture of Dorian Gray," Oscar Wilde wrote, "It is the shallow people who do not judge by appearances." While it may be tempting to argue that we should not judge people based on their appearance, in reality, it is often the case that we do. This is because our first impressions are often based on what we see, and it takes time and effort to get to know someone beyond their exterior.

On the one hand, judging people by their appearance can be problematic. It can lead to unfair assumptions and discrimination. For example, a person who is dressed in shabby clothes may be assumed to be poor and uneducated, even if this is not the case. Similarly, a person who is overweight may be assumed to be lazy and lacking in self-control, even if they have underlying health conditions.

On the other hand, it is also true that we often make judgments based on appearance for practical reasons. For example, if we are interviewing candidates for a job, we may take into account how they dress and present themselves, as this can give us an idea of their professionalism and attention to detail. Similarly, if we are looking for a romantic partner, we may be attracted to someone based on their physical appearance, as this can indicate genetic fitness and reproductive potential.

Ultimately, it is important to strike a balance between judging people based on their appearance and getting to know them on a deeper level. While it may be shallow to make assumptions about someone based solely on their looks, it is also important to acknowledge that appearance can play a role in how we interact with others in a practical sense. Instead of dismissing appearance altogether, we should strive to look beyond it and get to know people as individuals, with their own unique qualities and characteristics.

In conclusion, while it may be tempting to argue that we should not judge people based on their appearance, the reality is that we often do. While this can lead to unfair assumptions and discrimination, it is also true that appearance can play a practical role in how we interact with others. The key is to strike a balance between judging based on appearance and getting to know people as individuals beyond their exterior.

Explanation: