Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
(MC)What is true about civil court cases?
They have a lower burden of proof compared to criminal cases.
They are usually filed in federal courts.
They begin with an arrest and are followed by depositions.
All of the above are true.

Answer:

You didn’t list the following?

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

a red flag used as a warning of danger.

a red flag used as the symbol of socialist revolution.

Answer:

Cross-examination is the process of interrogation of the witness from the opposed counsel.

Explanation:

Answer:attempt to impeach the witness's character

Explanation:

In the question related to Marbury v. Madison and McCullough v. Maryland are:

Question 47 — true

Question 48 — used the Necessary and Proper Clause to expand the power of Congress.

Question 49 — expanded the power of the Executive branch.

What is the Marbury v. Madison?

In the famous Marbury v. Madison decision, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), the U.S. Supreme Court established the idea of judicial review, which states that American courts have the authority to invalidate laws and acts that they determine to be in conflict with the U.S. Constitution. Marbury, which was decided in 1803, is seen to be the single most significant case in American constitutional law. Defining the line between the executive and judicial branches of the federal government, which are constitutionally separate, was made easier by the Supreme Court's landmark decision, which established that the U.S. Constitution is actual law and not just a statement of political principles and ideals.

To lean more about Marbury v. Madison from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/19334594
#SPJ1

Question 47 of 50

Marbury v. Madison gave the Supreme Court equal standing with the Executive and Legislative branches.

O True

O False

Question 48 of 50

McCullough v. Maryland was a significant Supreme Court case because it:

O used the Necessary and Proper Clause to expand the power of Congress.

O found that state laws were the supreme laws of the land.

 O expanded the powers of the Executive branch.

O allowed the President to deploy troops without a Congressional declaration of war.

O restricted the power of the Legislative branch.

Question 49 of 50

The main similarity between Marbury v. Madison, McCullough v Maryland, and U.S. V Nixon is that all three cases

O n expanded the power of the Judicial branch.

O 4 restricted the power of state courts.

O expanded the power of the Executive branch.

 O decreased the power of the Legislative branch.

O decreased the power of the Judicial branch.

Answer:

practice the ceiling breach and pull

Explanation:

B is wrong

Try stair climbing.

Answer:

im not sure

Explanation:

This is a question that relates to an investigation at a crime scene. The questions that are immediately apparent are: "Where did the blood come from"? "Who could have done this? "What was their motive?" "Did she have a quarrel with anyone?"

A crime scene is any site that may be related to a crime that has been committed. Physical evidence from crime scenes is relevant to a criminal inquiry. Crime scene investigators and law enforcement collect this evidence.

Physical evidence recognition, recording, correct collection, packing, preservation, and, lastly, scene reconstruction are the essential crime scene processes.

Learn more about Crime Scenes:
https://brainly.com/question/10702774
#SPJ1

Full Question:

The Crime + Crime Scene:

You walk into the home of Sue Ellen Miller, the victim. Sue Ellen is a middle-aged, unmarried woman who lives alone. She has very long, black hair and is short and petite. She has no pets, children, or roommates. She worked as a museum curator at the local museum.You notice a pool of blood next to her body on the pink rug. The blood looks almost dry, as if it had beensitting there for several hours. You cannot identify any wounds where the blood may be coming from without moving the body. Her body is splayed out in the middle of the living room floor. She is lying on her back, with her arms andlegs bent at awkward angles.All the lights are off in the room; the TV is still on, however the screen is simply black, no picture or menu is showing.As you carefully walk around her body, you notice a thin trail of dirt leading from the back door to her body.You make a mental note to check the yard for soil. You also notice broken glass near her left leg and freshflowers laying on the floor. There is a note on the table indicating that the flowers were a gift. The card is signed, “Your Loving male acquaintance, Ben.”You get closer to the body and notice several short, brown hairs stuck to her pants.On the coffee table, there is a pile of museum comment cards that appear to be only partially read through.The card on the top of the pile catches your eye, as it has large, angry doodles decorating the page. Writtenat the bottom of the page, in big letters is, “I TOLD YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE!”. You note that the card wasfilled out by a Michael Wilcox. You write down his name and wonder if it was his real name.Next to the cards on the table is a pizza delivery box, slightly open, but with an untouched pizza inside. Thereceipt next to the box shows that the pizza was delivered yesterday evening at 5:15pm. Sue Ellen’ssignature is on the receipt.On the sharp corner of the table, there is a bloodstain. It looks dry and is the only apparent bloodstain asidefrom the puddle next to the body.You move away from the body and begin to look around the room. You notice a bloody fingerprint near theback door on the doorframe. You also notice that the lock on the door appears to have been tampered with.

You head outside and examine the backyard. There is a tall wooden fence, a well-tended rose garden with awater fountain in the center, and freshly cut grass.You examine the garden and spot another bloody fingerprint on the water fountain and a footprint in thegarden soil near the fence. Upon closer inspection of the fence, you find one medium length blonde haircaught between the wooden planks.You return to the house and notice a man has arrived on the scene. He identifies himself as Ben, the male friend. He explains that he was on a flight back from a business trip in DC and just arrived home thismorning. He claims to have the plane ticket stub at home to prove it.Moments later, a female neighbor arrives on the scene and claims to have seen a tall, blonde man or teen loitering in the garden yesterday evening when she was walking her dog. She did not speak to the man, buthe was wearing a black jacket and black jeans.You get your Investigative Journal out and start taking notes to make a plan for your investigation.

What questions do you have based on what you observe?

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

The students between the ages of 14-16 who are in high school are the freshmen (9th graders) and sophomores (10th graders).

A high school is an educational institution more advanced than an elementary school (grade 1 to grade 5) or middle school (grade 6 to grade 8) but less advanced than a college.

The age grades of high school students are as follows:

Age      High School Grade     Description

14-15 Grade 9                     Freshmen

15-16 Grade 10                    Sophomores

16-17 Grade 11                     Juniors

17-18 Grade 12                    Seniors

The high school system is not peculiar to the United States.  Australia and some other countries operate similar school systems to America's.

Thus, any students between the ages of 14-16 who are in high school are 9th graders and 10th graders.

Learn more about the American school system at https://brainly.com/question/13682093

#SPJ1

Answer: due process    

Answer:

Have a set time in an neigorhood like 11:00 p.m. everyone should be in the home.

Answer: False

Explanation:

It is part of the legislative branch

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If you ever get confused about the U.S. government, just remember this simple rhyme: The House and the Senate make the laws, the President and the Cabinet enforce them with their claws. The House is part of Congress, not the executive, that would be nonsense. The Congress controls the money and the bills, the executive deals with foreign ills. So don't mix up the branches or you'll get a scolding, they have different functions and different roles for upholding.

                      Here is the serious version....

                              (Though that should be a song o(≧▽≦)o ) ....

The U.S. House of Representatives is one of the two chambers that make up the legislative branch of the federal government, along with the Senate. The legislative branch has the power to create and pass laws, as well as to control the federal spending. The executive branch, on the other hand, is composed of the President, the Vice President, and the Cabinet members. The executive branch has the power to execute and enforce laws, as well as to conduct foreign relations.

Answer:

Abstract

Presidential influence is partly a function of the partisan, economic, and international context within which the president governs. Presidents are, however, more than bystanders relying on the political milieu for policy opportunities. Recent scholarship demonstrates that presidents consciously influence this milieu and build political capital by campaigning for congressional candidates. We contribute to this literature by assessing the effects of presidential campaigning on legislative support for two presidents who governed under extremely dissimilar circumstances: Bill Clinton in the 106th Congress and George W. Bush in the 108th Congress. We find evidence of campaign effects on congressional policymaking during both administrations.

Journal Information

The Legislative Studies Quarterly is an international journal devoted to the publication of research on representative assemblies. Its purpose is to disseminate scholarly work on parliaments and legislatures, their relations to other political institutions, their functions in the political system, and the activities of their members both within the institution and outside. Contributions are invited from scholars in all countries. The pages of the Quarterly are open to all research approaches consistent with the normal canons of scholarship, and to work on representative assemblies in all settings and all time periods. The aim of the journal is to contribute to the formulation and verification of general theories about legislative systems, processes, and behavior. The editors encourage contributors to emphasize the cross-national implications of their findings, even if these findings are based on research within a single country. The Legislative Studies Quarterly is the official journal of the Legislative Studies Section of the American Political Science Association.

Publisher Information

Washington University creates an environment to encourage and support an ethos of wide-ranging exploration. Washington University’s faculty and staff strive to enhance the lives and livelihoods of students, the people of the greater St. Louis community, the country and the world.

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

refusing visitation only hurts the kids and denies them the ability to create a bone with the other parent

Answer:

The answer is the first one : all laws

Answer

Answer: Asking for it.

Explanation: I got the answer from my computer book :)

In phishing scams, a scam artist obtains the victim’s personal information by asking for it. Thus, option second is correct.

Phishing is a type of online fraud in which people are taken advantage of by receiving emails that look to be from trustworthy firms such as banks, mortgage lenders, or internet service providers.

Phishing can happen via text message, social media, or phone calls, although the term is most commonly used to refer to email-based attacks. Phishing emails have the ability to directly reach millions of users, while also blending in with the many nice emails that busy people receive.

The victim gets an email from the app informing them that their account has been and will be terminated unless they confirm their credit card details. After clicking the link in the phishing email, the victim is sent to a bogus website where the stolen information is stored. Hence, option B is correct.

Learn more about phishing scams, here:

brainly.com/question/2880574

#SPJ2

Answer:

I feel like this is more an opinion question than anything so I believe that you should give your own answer and your own opinion.

Explanation:

But yes I believe we are, I cant provide details to "prove" it atm as I'm in school, but you could do that research.

Answer:

The primary expectation placed on the people of Boston on the fourteenth day of April 1631 was to guard the town and keep it safe from wild animals, fires and criminals.

They were also expected to take particular care of their guns with a fine placed on anyone who misused them.

Cheers

Answer:

Police are trained to help stranded motorists. They will most likely have jumper cables to jump-start your car, but it wouldn't hurt for you to have a pair of cables just in case you ever need them

Explanation:

Answer:

Trials in criminal and civil cases are generally conducted the same way. After all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the law related to the case to a jury, the jurors decide the facts in the case and render a verdict. If there is no jury, the judge makes a decision on the case.

Explanation:

Answer:

road narrows,right lane ends

This road sign means road narrows, right lane ends. Therefore, the correct option is A.

Road signs are visual symbols or markings placed along roadways to provide important information and guidance to drivers. They communicate various messages, including traffic regulations, warnings of potential hazards, directions to specific destinations, and information about road conditions.

A road sign indicating "road narrows, right lane ends" typically warns drivers that the roadway ahead will narrow and the right lane will come to an end.

This sign serves as an advance warning to drivers, prompting them to merge left and adjust their position on the road to accommodate the narrowing lane.

Learn more about road signs in:

https://brainly.com/question/3016269

#SPJ2

Answer:

Rule of president

Explanation:

Because of the power and everything

Answer:

the answer is B- law based on precedent

Explanation:

Answer:

Correct answer:

THEY INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF SURVIVAL IN MOST TYPES OF ACCIDENTS.

Brainliest plz

Safety belts increases our chances of survival in most types of accidents. The correct option is a.

As we all know wearing safety belts can prevent us to get injured during an accident, therefore wearing one is utmost necessary. Safety belts are most effective when used properly. All vehicles made today have a lap or shoulder belt combination. Shoulder belts should go over the shoulder and across the center of the chest. Lap belts should fit snugly across the hips, not over the stomach. We should never leave slack in our seatbelt.

We should also never tuck a shoulder belt under our arm or behind our back for any reason, including to defeat the seatbelt alarm. Wearing a safety belt improves survival by 50 percent for front seat passengers during a crash. Wearing lap and shoulder belts is the most effective way to reduce fatalities and serious injuries in traffic collisions.

Nowadays we can also see that wearing safety belts has been made mandatory by law.

Learn more about safety, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2964363

#SPJ2

A forensic scientist's day-to-day activities will vary throughout the week. The majority of their time is spent in the office writing reports and preparing for laboratory visits. Other days, however, they may be carrying out a laboratory visit or attending court as an expert witness (Brightside, 2003).

Answer:

hope this helps

Explanation:

Grounded in shared values, human rights offer unifying principles that can be used to connect with people on a personal level, build their leadership, create a vision for change, shift the public debate, guide policy advocacy and build common ground within and between movements.