Question 3 of 10
What is the measure of _XYZ shown in the diagram below?
Possible answers 69, 67 ,68,66

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We have a triangle and this triangle has got 3 edge a,b,c

a+b>c>|a-b|

18>x>2

Answer:

the answer is \(18>x>2\)

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

m +2 = 4

m = 2

x = 1

y +1 = 2

y = 1

z = -1

Answer:

Saturday: 1.5x

Sunday: 2x

Step-by-step explanation:

    For the the Chart, Saturday, we can automatically see that when 1 is inputted into the equation we get 1.5, as anything times 1 will equal the same number inputted (x). So we can try 1.5x and plug in every other x value and see what we get:

1.5(2) = 3

1.5(3) = 4.5

1.5(4) = 6

This verifies that the equation 1.5x works with this chart.

   For the graph its simple, do rise over run and your slope is 2/1 which is 2 so we have 2x for our equation so far and now to find the + or - at the end of the equation ( the "b" variable of the mx + b form) we just look at where does the function intersect with the Y-axis. Since it is at 0 we don't need to add a "b" variable to the equation so the equation for the graph is 2x for Sunday.

Answer:

40 and 136

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of the 2 numbers = 5 : 17 = 5x : 17x ( x is a multiplier )

One number is 96 more than the other then

17x = 5x + 96 ( subtract 5x from both sides )

12x = 96 ( divide both sides by 12 )

x = 8 , then

5x = 5 × 8 = 40

17x = 17 × 8 = 136

The 2 numbers are 40 and 136

The population size of mantis shrimp will be approximately 266 individuals after 5 years.

The intrinsic rate of increase is an essential concept in population biology. It is the rate at which a population is growing at a particular moment in time. The population size after a particular period can be calculated using the intrinsic rate of increase with the help of this formula:

Nt = N0e^(rt)

where Nt is the future population size, N0 is the initial population size, r is the intrinsic rate of increase, and t is the time in years.

The population size of mantis shrimp is 475 individuals and the intrinsic rate of increase is -0.10.

We can calculate the population size after 5 years using the above formula as follows:

Nt = N0e^(rt)

Nt = 475 * e^(-0.10 * 5)

Nt = 475 * e^(-0.50)

Nt ≈ 266

Learn more about population size at

https://brainly.com/question/9381460

#SPJ11

Answer:

ST = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

A. Using the distance formula, we can state that the opposite sides are congruent because AD = BC = √10 units and AB = CD = √40 units.

B. The diagonals are equal, AC = BD = √50 units.

C. Based on the slopes of each side, there are 4 right angles on the rectangle.

The distance formula is used to find the distance that exist between tow points that are on a coordinate plane. The formula is: d = \(\sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2}\).

What is the Slope of a Line?

Slope = change in y / change in x.

A. The coordinates of each of the vertices of the rectangle are:

A(1, 2)

B(7, 4)

C(8, 1)

D(2, -1)

Use the distance formula to find AB, CD, BC, and AD.

AB = √[(7−1)² + (4−2)²]

AB = √40

CD = √[(2−8)² + (−1−1)²]

CD = √40

BC = √[(8−7)² + (1−4)²]

BC = √10

AD = √[(2−1)² + (−1−2)²]

AD = √10

Therefore, the opposite sides are congruent because AD = BC = √10 units and AB = CD = √40 units.

B. The diagonals are AC and BD. Find their lengths using the distance formula:

AC = √(8−1)² + (1−2)²]

AC = √50 units

BD = √[(2−7)² + (−1−4)²]

BD = √50 units

Therefore, the diagonals are equal, AC = BD = √50 units.

C. Find the slope of AB, CD, BC, and AD:

Slope of AB = change in y / change in x = rise/run = 2/6 = 1/3

Slope of CD = 2/6 = 1/3

Slope of BC = -3/1 = -3

Slope of AD = -3/1 = -3

-3 is the negative reciprocal to 1/3, this means that, if the two lines that meet at a corner have these two slope, then they will form a right angle because they are perpendicular to each other.

Therefore, there are 4 right angles on the rectangle.

Learn more about the distance formula on:

https://brainly.com/question/661229

#SPJ1

Answer: imaginary axis

Step-by-step explanation:

Two prisms with the same volume are rectangular prisms of the dimensions  1 by 4 by 9 and 2 by 3 by 6

To do this, we start by determining the type of prism to create.

Assume that we want to create a rectangular prism.

The volume of a rectangular prism is:

Volume = Length * Width * Height

Using the digits 1 - 9, we have:

Prism 1

Length = 1

Width = 4

Height = 9

The volume is

Volume = 1 * 4 * 9 = 36

This means that the second prism must have a volume of 36.

Using the digits 1 - 9, we have:

Prism 2

Length = 2

Width = 3

Height = 6

The volume is

Volume = 2 * 3 * 6 = 36

Notice that the digits are not repeated.

Hence, two prisms with the same volume are rectangular prisms of the dimensions  1 by 4 by 9 and 2 by 3 by 6

Read more about volumes at:

https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

Answer:

2 5/12

Step-by-step explanation:

(5 + 1/4) - (2 - 5/6)

5 - 2 = 3

(1/4 x 3/3) - (5/6 x 2/2) = 3/12 - 10/12 = -7/12

3 - 7/12 = 2 5/12

The car must achieve an acceleration of 120 mi/hr^2 during the 10-minute interval according to the Mean Value Theorem. To find the acceleration of the car, we can use the Mean Value Theorem, which states that there must be a point in time between 2:00pm and 2:10pm where the instantaneous velocity of the car is equal to the average velocity over that time period.

The average velocity of the car over this time period is: Average velocity = (change in distance) / (change in time)
Average velocity = (70 - 50) / 10 minutes = 2 mi/min
To convert mi/min to mi/hr, we multiply by 60:
Average velocity = 2 mi/min * 60 min/hr = 120 mi/hr
So, there must be a point in time where the instantaneous velocity of the car is equal to 120 mi/hr. Now, we can use the formula for acceleration: Acceleration = (change in velocity) / (change in time)
We know the change in velocity is 70 - 50 = 20 mi/hr, and the change in time is 10 minutes, or 1/6 hour.
Acceleration = (20 mi/hr) / (1/6 hour) = 120 mi/hr^2
Therefore, the acceleration the car must achieve is 120 mi/hr^2.

Using the Mean Value Theorem and the formula for acceleration, we found that the car must achieve an acceleration of 120 mi/hr^2 between 2:00pm and 2:10pm.
Answer: Using the Mean Value Theorem, we can determine the acceleration the car must achieve between 2:00 pm and 2:10 pm. In the given scenario, the car's speed changes from 50 mph to 70 mph over a 10-minute time interval. To apply the Mean Value Theorem, first, we need to convert the time interval to hours. Ten minutes is equal to 1/6 of an hour (10/60). Now, we can find the average rate of change in speed (also known as acceleration) by dividing the change in speed by the change in time. The change in speed is 70 mph - 50 mph = 20 mph. The change in time is 1/6 of an hour. Therefore, the acceleration is: Acceleration = (Change in Speed) / (Change in Time) = 20 mph / (1/6 hr) = 120 mi/hr^2.

To know more about acceleration visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30595529

#SPJ

The statement "f(n) equals O(g(n)) and g(n) equals O(f(n)) then f(n) equals Θ(g(n))" is true.

In computer science, the O-notation and Θ-notation are used to describe the upper and tight bounds, respectively, of the running time of an algorithm. O-notation provides an upper bound on the running time of an algorithm, while Θ-notation provides a tight bound, meaning that the running time of an algorithm is both upper-bounded and lower-bounded by a certain function.

When f(n) equals O(g(n)), it means that the growth rate of f(n) is upper-bounded by the growth rate of g(n). In other words, the running time of f(n) is no greater than that of g(n), multiplied by some constant factor.

When g(n) equals O(f(n)), it means that the growth rate of g(n) is upper-bounded by the growth rate of f(n). This implies that the running time of g(n) is no greater than that of f(n), multiplied by some constant factor.

If both f(n) equals O(g(n)) and g(n) equals O(f(n)), it can be concluded that the running time of f(n) and g(n) are asymptotically equivalent. This means that their growth rates are the same, and thus f(n) equals Θ(g(n)).

In conclusion, if f(n) equals O(g(n)) and g(n) equals O(f(n)), it is true that f(n) equals Θ(g(n)), which means that the two functions have the same growth rate. This property can be useful in comparing the running time of different algorithms or in analyzing the efficiency of algorithms.

For more such questions on computer algorithms

https://brainly.com/question/24953880

#SPJ4

Answer:

why does m what????

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(x + 7)(x - 4) = x2 - 4x + 7x - 28 = x2 + 3x - 28

Answer:

(1, -8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve by Substitution

9x − y = 17 and 5x + 4y = −27

Solve for y in the first equation.

y = −17 + 9x 5x + 4y = −27

Replace all occurrences of y with −17 + 9x in each equation.

Replace all occurrences of y in 5x + 4y = −27 with −17 + 9x. 5x + 4 (−17 + 9x) = −27

y = −17 + 9x

Simplify 5x + 4 (−17 + 9x).

41x − 68 = −27 y = −17 + 9x

Solve for x in the first equation.

Move all terms not containing x to the right side of the equation.

41x = 41

y = −17 + 9x

Divide each term by 41 and simplify.

x = 1

y = −17 + 9x

Replace all occurrences of x with 1 in each equation.

Replace all occurrences of x in y = −17 + 9x with 1. y = −17 + 9 (1)

x = 1

Simplify −17 + 9 (1).

y = −8

x = 1

The solution to the system is the complete set of ordered pairs that are valid solutions.

(1, −8)

The result can be shown in multiple forms.

Point Form:

(1, −8)

Equation Form:

x = 1, y = −8

120% is equivalent to the fraction 11/5.

Fractions are defined as part of a whole. A whole can be an object or a group of objects. In real life, if you cut a pie out of the whole pie, that piece becomes part of the pie. Fractions are words of Latin origin. "Fractus" means "broken" in Latin.  

If 1/5 = 20%, then we can convert 120% to a fraction by first dividing by 100 to get the decimal equivalent, and then adding 1 to get the fractional equivalent:

120% = 120/100 = 1.2

1.2 + 1 = 2.2

Therefore, 120% is equivalent to the fraction 11/5.

To know more about decimal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29765582

#SPJ1

Answer:

(61/7, -47/7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: y=2/7 -7

           y=-x+2

Rewrite the top equation ( y=2/7 -7

y = -47/7

y = -x + 2

Because both equations are equal to y, we can rewrite it again.

-47/7 = -x + 2

Add x to both sides

x + (-47/7) = 2

Add 47/7 to both sides.

x = 47/7 + 2/1

x = 61/7

As stated in the beginning, y is equal to -47/7

Hope you understand!

To minimize costs, the optimal distribution schedule for Finnish Furniture would involve shipping 130 units from Reno to Phoenix, 20 units from Denver to Cleveland, and 160 units from Pittsburgh to Chicago. This allocation is determined by using the transportation algorithm, specifically the Vogel's Approximation Method (VAM), which considers the lowest shipping costs per unit for each source-destination combination. By following this approach, the total cost for the distribution is calculated to be $4,360.

To determine the optimal distribution schedule that minimizes costs, we need to allocate the available supplies from the manufacturing facilities to the retail stores based on the shipping costs per unit. We can achieve this by employing the transportation algorithm, such as the North-West Corner Rule or the Vogel's Approximation Method (VAM).

Using VAM, we begin by identifying the lowest shipping cost per unit for each row and column in the given table. We then select the highest difference between the two lowest costs, considering both rows and columns. This difference indicates the most cost-effective allocation.

In this case, the VAM suggests shipping 130 units from Reno to Phoenix since the shipping cost per unit is 10, which is the lowest for the Reno row. For Cleveland, Denver has the lowest cost at 14, so we allocate 20 units from Denver to Cleveland. Lastly, we allocate 160 units from Pittsburgh to Chicago, as the cost per unit is the lowest at 12 for the Pittsburgh column.

Now, let's calculate the total cost. The cost of shipping 130 units from Reno to Phoenix is 130 x 10 = $1,300. Shipping 20 units from Denver to Cleveland costs 20 x 14 = $280. Lastly, shipping 160 units from Pittsburgh to Chicago costs 160 x 12 = $1,920. Adding these costs together gives us a total cost of $1,300 + $280 + $1,920 = $4,360.

Learn more about Optimal distribution

brainly.com/question/15700934

#SPJ11

Answer: Its 7,6 HONEYZ

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:  3n+2  hours

To get this answer, you divide the distance over speed

This is because

distance = rate*time

time = distance/rate

So we have

time = (distance)/(rate)

time = (6n^2+4n)/(2n)

time = (6n^2)/(2n) + (4n)/(2n)

time = 3n + 2 hours

Answer:

You can write equivalent expressions by combining like terms. Like terms are terms that have the same variables raised to the same powers. For example, the list shows some pairs of like terms. the new coefficient is 9.

Step-by-step explanation:

\(hope \: it \: helps \: you\)

Answer:

You subtract 3n from both sides to get to to the second equation

Step-by-step explanation:

and then you get 3n-12=18,if you go further down the line and add 12 to both 12 and 18 you will have 3n=30 and divide N =10

A) $15,025.8. is the correct option. Chloe loans out a sum of $1,000 every quarter to her associates at an interest rate of 4%, compounded quarterly. She stand to get $15,025.8. if er loans are repaid after three years.

Chloe loans out a sum of $1,000 every quarter to her associates at an interest rate of 4%, compounded quarterly.

We need to find how much she stands to gain if er loans are repaid after three years.

Calculation: Semi-annual compounding = Quarterly compounding * 4 Quarterly interest rate = 4% / 4 = 1%

Number of quarters in three years = 3 years × 4 quarters/year = 12 quarters

Future value of $1,000 at 1% interest compounded quarterly after 12 quarters:

FV = PV(1 + r/m)^(mt) Where PV = 1000, r = 1%, m = 4 and t = 12 quartersFV = 1000(1 + 0.01/4)^(4×12)FV = $1,153.19

Total amount loaned out in 12 quarters = 12 × $1,000 = $12,000

Total interest earned = $1,153.19 - $12,000 = $-10,846.81

Therefore, Chloe stands to lose $10,846.81 if all her loans are repaid after three years.

Hence, the correct option is A) $15,025.8.

To know more about compounded quarterly visit:

brainly.com/question/33359365

#SPJ11

Answer:

-----------------

Find each area and then find their difference.

The difference is:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

we have been given the mean as 5 so it means you have to multiply five with the mean since there are five numbers .If you multiply you will get 25 then add 5+8+2+6 the answer you will get is 21 thn write an equation 21+x=25 because 21 has a positive sign infront of it when it crosses the equal sign it will change to a negative sign the equation will be x=25-21 if you subtract you will get 4 so x=4

Engineers can be held most morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations, engineers have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work,

and to take steps to mitigate those consequences. If they fail to do so, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. When engineers develop new technologies, they have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work.

They need to think about how their technology could be used, and whether it could be used to harm people or the environment.

They also need to consider how their technology could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

For example, engineers who develop new weapons systems have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work. They need to think about how their weapons could be used,

and whether they could be used to kill or injure innocent people. They also need to consider how their weapons could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their weapons are used to kill or injure innocent people, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

It is important to note that engineers cannot be held morally blameworthy for unforeseeable harms. This is because they did not have the opportunity to anticipate the harm, and they could not have taken steps to prevent it.

For example, engineers who develop new medical treatments cannot be held morally blameworthy if the treatments have unforeseen side effects. This is because the engineers did not have the opportunity to anticipate the side effects, and they could not have taken steps to prevent them.

In conclusion, engineers can be held morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations.

This is because they have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work, and to take steps to mitigate those consequences.

To know more about  Engineers click here

brainly.com/question/30592664

#SPJ11

Answer:

2/3

24/36

32/48

are all equivalent to 8/12

Answer:

32/48

Step-by-step explanation:

32 divided by 4 is 8

48 divided by 4 is 12

The answer would be 51, because the sequence pattern is adding up by odd numbers.

Answer:

51

Step-by-step explanation:

I know that someone has already answered this, but I think it might be better to know the actual formula to find the answer. Since we can find a common increase of 2 in each increase, we can use a(n) = n^(increase) + a0

For example, to find the 7th term (The one you're looking for) You can do

a(7) = 7^2 + 2

which gives you 51.

The inequality |u| > c is equivalent to u > c or -u > c, depending on whether u is positive or negative.

To solve the inequality |u| > c, we need to consider two cases: when u is positive and when u is negative.

Case 1: When u is positive, the inequality |u| > c is equivalent to u > c. This is because the absolute value of a positive number is the number itself.

Case 2: When u is negative, the inequality |u| > c is equivalent to -u > c. This is because the absolute value of a negative number is the opposite of the number.

In summary, the inequality |u| > c is equivalent to u > c or -u > c, depending on whether u is positive or negative.

Know more about absolute value here:

https://brainly.com/question/29775273

#SPJ11