Car insurance protects you from paying for damages to your car in a collision. It is a type of insurance that helps cover the costs of repairing or replacing your vehicle if it gets damaged in an accident, collision, or other events covered by the policy.
There are different types of car insurance policies, and the coverage and benefits vary depending on the policy you choose. The basic types of car insurance policies are liability insurance, collision insurance, and comprehensive insurance.Liability insurance covers the costs of damage or injuries caused by you in an accident. It also covers the costs of legal fees and court expenses if you are sued. Collision insurance covers the costs of damage to your car in an accident or collision with another vehicle or object.
Comprehensive insurance covers the costs of damage to your car caused by non-collision events such as theft, vandalism, fire, or natural disasters. It also covers the costs of repairing or replacing your car if it gets stolen.Car insurance is mandatory in most states, and it is a legal requirement to have it if you own a car. The cost of car insurance depends on various factors such as the type of car, the driver's age, driving history, location, and coverage options. It is essential to have car insurance to protect yourself and your car from unexpected events that can cause significant financial damage.
To know more about insurance policies click here
brainly.com/question/30733813
#SPJ11
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
What do you understand by the terms ‘Law’ in general and ‘Business law in particular’?
Answer:
Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.
Explanation:
Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.
In how many states were correctional officers represented by unions in 2012
When courts are faced with interpreting a contract to determine the meaning and legal effect of the terms used by the parties, the court will first attempt to determine the
When courts are faced with interpreting a contract to determine the meaning and legal effect of the terms used by the parties, the court will first attempt to determine the parties' intent.
The court will look to the language of the contract and will consider the circumstances under which the contract was formed, such as the negotiation process between the parties, any prior agreements between them, and the surrounding circumstances. If the parties have clear, unambiguous language expressing their intentions, the court will give effect to the language used.
If, however, the language of the contract is open to multiple interpretations, the court will consider extrinsic evidence, such as past performance, prohibited use of the contract for something other than its stated purpose, or any other details that might shed light on what the parties intended. Ultimately, the court will endeavor to interpret the language in a manner that carries out the intentions of the parties.
To know more about court , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
what is article 15 military
Answer:
Non-Judicial Punishment
Explanation:
Article 15 in the U.S military is a punishment you receive as a member of the armed forces. Comparable to a violation as a civilian, however Article 15 imposes suspension with/without pay depending on your rank.
The ONLY type of mistake that can be used as a defense is a mistake of , A) law ,B) fact C)police procedure D) identity
Answer:
fact
Explanation:
I've learned this before and I know its fact
Answer:
The Criminal Defense of Mistake
In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.
Mistakes of Fact
Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.
Mistake of Law
Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.
Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:
When the law has not been published;
When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;
When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or
When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.
Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.
It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.
Mistake and Strict Liability
Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.
A _______ is when a state legislature decides to allow the people of the state to vote directly on an issue.
A) resolution
B) popular referendum indirect process
C) legislative referendum
Answer:I think C
Explanation:
"Referendum" is a general term which refers to a measure that appears on the ballot. There are two primary types of referenda: the legislative referendum, whereby the Legislature refers a measure to the voters for their approval, and the popular referendum, a measure that appears on the ballot as a result of a voter petition drive. The popular referendum is similar to the initiative in that both are triggered by petitions, but there are important differences. Legislatures are often required to refer certain measures t…
Ivan met with his friend Anthony, who was driving a flashy new red convertible. Ivan knew that neither Anthony nor his family owned this car, but it looked good, so he got in and let Anthony take him for a ride. Ivan also knew that Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. Anthony offered to sell Ivan an MP3 player he had in the back seat of the car for $40. Ivan agreed to pay him the money.
a. Have any crimes been committed? If so, which crimes and by whom?
b. Why does society make receiving stolen property a crime? Should it be?
c. Would you ever buy something for an extremely low price from a friend? How would you know for sure it was not stolen?
Yes, a crime was committed as Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. This was a crime of theft.
The crime of receiving a stolen property is defined as knowingly receiving the stolen property with the sole intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property stolen. So, receiving of stolen property is a crime.
So, this tends to prevent concealing of a property by a particular person who thus know that such property is thus obtained by an illegal way. Suppose if an item is sold by at a very low price so the item can be stolen. Thus, this is an act of crime which is called theft.
Hence, handling stolen goods is a crime.
To learn more about theft here:
https://brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ1
. grant a full pardon to a person convicted of a felony. b. commute a death sentence to life imprisonment at hard labor. c. remit a fine to a person who has been assessed one. d. grant one 30-day stay of execution of a death sentence.
The correct option is c. The governor of Texas may grant 30 days stay of the execution in case of a death sentence.
The death penalty, sometimes known as the capital punishment, is a state-sanctioned procedure that involves killing a person as retribution for a crime. A death sentence is a judgment ordering that a criminal be punished in this way, and the act of carrying out that judgment is known as an execution. The phrase "on death row" refers to a prisoner who has recently been given a death sentence and is currently awaiting execution. The use of the death penalty is debatable in many nations and states, and opinions might differ even within one political philosophy or one cultural area. According to Amnesty International, the death sentence is against human rights.
In the case of a person facing a death sentence, the governor of Texas may independently
a. grant a full pardon to a person convicted of a felony.
b. remit a fine to a person who has been assessed one.
c. grant one 30-day stay of execution of a death sentence.
d. commute a death sentence to life imprisonment at hard labor.
Learn more about death sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/25182125
#SPJ4
Except for parole and probation officers, what are the minimum qualifications for careers in corrections?
a college degree and two years' experience working
a certificate in mental health
O only a high school diploma
O a high school diploma or GED, a driver's license, good health
Answer:
Here are the requirements.
Explanation:
- Be at least 18 years of age (some states/jurisdictions have a minimum age of 21)
- Possess a high school diploma or GED.
- Have no previous felony convictions.
- Be a United States citizen.
- Possess a valid driver's license.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
appraisals provide legal and formal organizational justification for
The formal and legal organizational reason for employment choices is provided by appraisals.
An appraisals is the estimation of a qualified person on the value of a piece of property, such as real estate, a company, a collectable, or an antique. The designation of the approved appraiser must come from the regulatory agency overseeing the appraiser's area of practice.
Appraisals are frequently used to estimate a potential selling price for a product or piece of property as well as for insurance and tax purposes. In many different kinds of transactions, organizational reason including real estate, appraisals are employed.
Mortgage lenders are likely to refuse to finance the sale if, for example, a house value comes in below the amount of the purchase price.
Learn more about appraisals, from :
brainly.com/question/32118196
#SPJ1
FACTS: Stilton was promoted to chief executive officer (CEO) of Tamik, Inc. a pharmaceutical company that manufactures a vaccine called Kafluk, which supposedly provides some defense against bird flu. The company began marketing Kafluk throughout Asia. After numerous media reports that bird flu might soon become a worldwide epidemic, the demand for Kafluk increased, sales soared, and Tamik earned record profits. Tamik’s CEO, Stilton, then began receiving disturbing reports from Southeast Asia that in some patients, Kafluk had caused psychiatric disturbances, including severe hallucinations, and heart and lung problems. Stilton, was informed that six children in Japan had died after receiving the vaccine. To cover up the story and prevent negative publicity, instructed Tamik’s partners in Asia to offer cash to the Japanese families whose children had died in exchanged for their silence. Silton also refused to authorize additional research within the company to study the potential side effects of Kafluk. Using the information presented in chapter 7 of the 11th ed. textbook, answer the following questions:
1) What is business ethics, and why is it important? and how can business leaders encourage their companies to act ethically?
2) How do duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards?
3) If Kafluk prevented fifty Asian people who were exposed to bird flu from dying, would Stilton’s conduct in this situation be ethical under a outcome-based ethical standard? Why or why not?
4) Would Stilton’s conduct be ethical under a duty- based ethical standard? Why or why not?
5) Did Tamik or Silton violate the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act in this scenario? Why or why not?
Answer:
1A. What is business ethics, and why is it important? Ethics is the study of what constitutes right or wrong behavior—the fairness, justness, rightness, or wrongness of an action. Business ethics focuses on what constitutes ethical behavior in the world of business. An understanding of business ethics is important to the long-run viability of a business firm and to the well being of the firm’s officers, managers, and employees. A business firm also owes duties to a variety of “stakeholders” whom the firm’s decisions and activities may affect significantly.
2A. How do duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards? Duty-based ethical standards are derived from religious precepts or philosophical principles. Outcome-based ethics focus on the consequences of an action, not on the nature of the action or on a set of pre-established moral values or religious beliefs.
3A. What are five steps that a business person can take to evaluate whether his or her actions are ethical? The first step is inquiry, the business decision maker must understand the problem, identify the parties involved and collect the relevant facts. Step 2 is to list the possible actions and goals, and discuss and evaluate the ethical principles of each option. The third step is to make a decision or adopt a plan of action. The fourth step is to articulate or document the reasoning (justification) underlying the decision. Once the decision has been made and implemented, step 5 is to evaluate the solution to determine if it was effective. This final step guides the businessperson when making future ethical decisions.
4A. How can business leaders encourage their companies to act ethically? Ethical leadership is important to create and maintain an ethical workplace. Managers can set standards, and apply those standards to themselves and their firm’s employees.
5A. What types of ethical issues might arise in the context of international business transactions? The most common types of issues to arise in an international context are those created by the different ethical standards and practices among different cultures and nations. These may include employment policies, the treatment of women and minorities, and (less likely) situations involving bribes.
Explanation:
hope this helps a litttle
In the end of the court case it was decided by the court that Sally was just over-reacting and should not receive any retribution for the stolen boyfriend. She decides she wants a second opinion and therefore appeals. The court is known as: *
Answer:
Appellate Court.Explanation:
The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.
Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.
At 55 mph it will take you approximately _ _feet to stop the car
Answer:
9
Explanation:
Which of the following is a litigant in a criminal trial?
The person accused
The attorneys
The court reporter
The clerk of the court
Answer:The attorney
Explanation:It is always the person who is suing.
Which of the following activities in the United States would most likely be paid for by a state government instead of a national government?
A. enforcement of traffic laws
B. inspection of agricultural products
C. maintenance of interstate highways
D. production of spy satellites
A state government rather than the federal government would most likely pay for the United States to check agricultural products.
What is federal government?The U.S. Constitution gives Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, in that order, control over the three separate branches that make up the Federal Government: legislative, executive, and judicial.Citizens are governed by federal and state governments separately. All fifty states are subject to some degree of federal control. State governments have the authority to enact laws inside their own borders.Among other things, these enumerated powers include the ability to levy taxes, control commerce, establish a uniform naturalization law, create federal courts (subordinate to the Supreme Court), create and maintain a military, and declare war. The Federal Government is now stronger thanks to the Constitution. The federal government and the state governments were given authority.Therefore, the correct option is b) inspection of agricultural products.
To learn more about federal government, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
The enforcement of traffic laws is typically a responsibility paid for by state governments in the United States rather than the national government.
Explanation:The activity among the options given that would most likely be paid for by a state government instead of the national government in the United States is the enforcement of traffic laws. Generally, the task of enforcing traffic laws falls under the jurisdiction of local and state governments. This involves tasks like managing traffic and enforcing speed limits. National functions, on the other hand, often involve larger-scale projects or regulations that impact the entire country, such as the production of spy satellites, maintenance of interstate highways, and inspection of agricultural products.
Learn more about State Government Responsibilities here:https://brainly.com/question/34234212
#SPJ2
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
Do you think the media or public judged OJ Simpson before the jury did?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
When people hear something they like to instantly believe that thing and start hating them.
Under the traditional marital share will, half of your estate is taxed at your death and half at your spouse's death. True.
Answer:
This is not necessarily true. The traditional marital share will, also known as a "bypass trust" or "credit shelter trust," is a type of estate planning tool that can be used to reduce or eliminate federal estate taxes on a couple's combined estate. Under this type of will, a portion of the decedent's estate is placed in a trust, and the surviving spouse has the right to use the assets in the trust for their benefit during their lifetime. Upon the surviving spouse's death, the assets in the trust are distributed to the trust's beneficiaries, which may include the couple's children or other heirs.
One of the primary benefits of a traditional marital share will is that it allows the surviving spouse to use the assets in the trust without paying federal estate taxes on those assets at the time of the decedent's death. The surviving spouse is also not required to pay federal estate taxes on the assets in the trust at their death, as the assets are not included in their taxable estate. However, the assets in the trust may be subject to state estate or inheritance taxes, depending on the laws of the state where the couple resides.
It is important to note that the traditional marital share will is just one of many estate planning tools that a couple can use to manage their assets and minimize taxes. The best course of action will depend on a variety of factors, including the size of the couple's estate, their tax situation, and their personal goals and objectives. It is recommended that couples consult with an experienced estate planning attorney to determine the most appropriate approach for their situation.
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
Which crime is classified as a misdemeanor?
O assault
O burglary
O murder
O speeding
The crime is classified as a misdemeanor is called speeding. Thus the correct option is D.
What is a misdemeanor?Though less harmful than murders, misdemeanors typically carry a greater degree of imprisonment. The penalty for a misdemeanor is a fine, imprisonment, or up to a year in a county or regional jail.
The threat or performance level of such an act, as well as the act of causing physical harm or unintentional contact with a person, may all fall under the legal definition of an assault regardless of the crime's level of seriousness.
Shoplifting, vandalism, drinking in public, and property crimes are examples of common crimes. Certain offenses may fall under the misdemeanor or felony categories, depending on the state.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about misdemeanors, here:
brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ7
Which scenario below best shows how state taxes support the economy?
Answer:
A special one year tax pays for building new schools.
A special one-year tax to help pay for building new schools would serve as an example of how local taxes support the economy. Public school funding is usually based on local taxes and therefore, this example is most likely exemplary of this.
Please mark as brainliest if answer is right
Have a great day, be safe and healthy
Thank u
XD
Which physical characteristic behavior is an indication that a patron might be obviously
intoxicated?
Answer:
- If they have red watery eyes
- The way they walk or stand
- The way they smell
- Sweating
- They could be loud or appear angry
- They're red
Explanation:
Those are some physical characteristic behavior that could indicate if someone is intoxicated.
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
One physical characteristic conduct that means that a supporter may be clearly inebriated is hindered coordination and equilibrium.
At the point when an individual is inebriated, liquor influences the focal sensory system, prompting decreased coordinated movements and equilibrium. A clearly inebriated supporter might stagger, experience issues strolling straight, or seem insecure while standing.
This conduct is an obvious indicator that their judgment and actual capacities are disabled, which can be a gamble to themselves as well as other people. Distinguishing such signs is urgent for barkeeps, servers, and setting staff to dependably mediate, deny further assistance, and guarantee the security and prosperity of the supporter and the general climate.
Learn more about physical characteristic, from:
brainly.com/question/32346447
#SPJ7
Watch a portion of the Chauvin Murder Trial. Summarize and describe the verbal and nonverbal actions of the courtroom participants (defendant, attorneys, judge, witnesses)
Why was Tarana Burke surprised by the Twitter activity on her #MeToo account?
lee Isaías 25,6-10 y encuentra dos comparaciones entre el banquete que describe
el profeta y la gloria que nos espera .
comparación 1
comparación 2
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Pues revisando la información solicitada, podemos hacer las siguientes comparaciones.
1.- En ese versículo, el profeta Isaías hace referencia a la metáfora de la montaña, en donde existe un gran banquete para los elegidos de Dios en la cima. Habla de las delicias que le esperan a los fieles de Dios como recompensa a sus acciones. Algo así como el premio del señor después de una vida entregada a él.
Podemos encontrar una idea similar, pero ésta se encuentra en el Nuevo Testamento, en el evangelio de Lucas, cuando el evangelista se refiere a que Jesús invita a los fieles a comer y gozar del reino de los cielos.
2.- La segunda comparación es cuando el profeta Isaías hace referencia a que Dios consolará a sus fieles en el cielo, después de la muerte. Ahí, dice Isaías, el humano ya no sentirá dolor ni sufrimiento como lo sentía en la Tierra.
De igual manera, en Corintios, dentro del Nuevo Testamento, se hace referencia a que Cristo vencerá a sus enemigos y reinará por siempre en el reino de los cielos, en donde el humano podrá vencer a la muerte como Jesús lo hizo.
A cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) clause in a collective bargaining agreement ties future wage increases to _____.
A collective bargaining agreement's cost-of-living adjustment clause links future wage increases to rises in the cost of living.
What places define wages?Wages are the financial rewards that are given to workers according to the amount of work completed. Either a daily or hourly payment schedule is used for the payout. Every business is required by law to provide all of its employees with a minimum wage.
What purpose do wages serve?The primary factor supporting living standards is wages. In times of inflation, the necessity to pay for living expenses is a persistent and significant source of pressure from workers for increased minimum salaries.
To know more about wages visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13916348
#SPJ1
17. Which of the following best describes trace evidence?
A. Tracing blood splatter back to its source at a crime scene
B. TraCing where a criminal lives based on the location of the crimes they have comrmitted
C. Dravwing a detailed illustration of the crime scene for evidence
D. Very small pieces of evidence
Answer:
I THINK ITS C
Explanation:
do u like jazz i do what abt u
Answer:
Explanation:
what is your question?
Answer:
Yes I like jazz ;)
Do u like bees?
Explanation: