Answer: local government services affect people in a smaller area
Explanation:
What does the author mean when she says they "failed to sense how dangerous the Nazis really were”?
(A) Some Jews believed the Nazis would be more tolerant of non-Aryans eventually.
(B) Some Jews did not fear the Nazis because most Germans did not support the party.
(C) Some Jews thought they could escape to other countries before they were arrested.
(D) Some Jews were not expecting Nazi
anti-Semitism to take such a violent turn.
Answer:
Answer is D on EDG
Explanation:
Took the assignment
Answer:
D. Some Jews were not expecting Nazi anti-Semitism to take such a violent turn.
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
Explanation:
In the passage, the author talks about the fact that she and other Jews didn't take the Nazis seriously at first. This was before she first handedly experienced the effects of anti-Semitism. If she failed to sense the danger of the Nazis, she surely wouldn't expect the violent turn of Nazi anti-Semitism.
Here's a photo of Edge, good luck.
will mark brain, you dont need to answer both
Answer:
which one do you want us to answer then ? Thanks
Explanation:
To describe growth after the industrial revolution, consider a manufacturing sector that combines capital K Mt and labor LMt to produce a final output good Y(Mt)
Y( Mt)=A (Mt) {K(Mt)^b} M L (Mt)^(1−b) M
1) Discuss how the manufacturing production function is different than the agricultural production function in terms of the inputs in the production function, A Mt ,K Mt, and LMt
. How do the inputs in the manufacturing sector change over time after the industrial revolution? 2) Describe how your answer to part (1) can lead to a breakdown in Malthus's logic. Specifically, why are wages not pinned down at subsistence levels anymore? Make sure your answer refers to the model you worked on in Problem Set 1.
1) is not fixed like the land is in the agricultural production function.
2) Due to rapid increases in factors like physical capital, education, and skills, lead to a breakdown in Malthus's logic.
1) First, physical capital is not fixed like the land is in the agricultural production function. Second, labor in manufacturing and services is not only a function of man hours as in the agricultural sector, but also a function of the education and skills of workers.
The industrial revolution led to new methods of production and increases in productivity . The industrial revolution led to consistent and quick rises in all three factors.
2) We assumed that in the steady-state productivity, land, and number of hours worked per worker were constant. However, the industrial revolution brought to a quick rise in physical capital, worker education and skill levels, new production techniques, and increased productivity. These lead to the breakdown of the steady-state assumption in our simple Malthus model, as the increase in factors outpaced the slower Malthusian forces.
Read more on Industrial Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/24206869
#SPJ4
View the map of the New England Colonies. In what present-day state is Plymouth located? What body of water borders New England to its east?
Plymouth is located in Massachusetts.
The pilgrims originally wanted to settle in Virginia, not Massachusetts. They ended up getting in a bad storm on the way to America and landed on Cape Cod. They then spent the rest of the winter on the Mayflower, as it was too cold to do anything productive.
The Atlantic Ocean is to the east of New England.
The ocean that borders New England is the Atlantic Ocean, specifically the Northern Atlantic. It is the second-largest ocean in the world.
Write a par of a history of the Akkadians. Must include a least 6 sentences (And the dates for each events)
Hi
Answer:
The Akkadians were an ancient civilization that ruled Mesopotamia between 2300 and 2100 BCE. They have contributed to the history and culture of Mesopotamia through their inventions and expertise.
In 2300 BC, the Akkadians established the first Mesopotamian empire, which expanded to Syria and Anatolia. They invented the cuneiform writing system in 2200 BCE, which enabled the Mesopotamian people to record their stories and knowledge. In 2100 BCE, they developed the Hammourabi Code, which established a system of justice and laws.
The Akkadians have also developed the first timetable, irrigation, and drainage techniques. They also contributed to science and metallurgy, as well as architecture and art.
can someone please write a small description of the Civial Rights Act of 1964
the concept of absolute comparative advantage's origins lie in: on the principles of political economy and taxation book, published in 1817. adam smith's work of 1776. the wealth of nations book, published in 1887. david ricardo's work of 1776.
The concept of absolute comparative advantage has its origins in David Ricardo's work of 1817, specifically his book "On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation."
In this book, Ricardo expanded upon and refined Adam Smith's earlier ideas on international trade and specialization. Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage stated that even if one country has an absolute advantage in producing all goods, both countries can still benefit from trade if they specialize in producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage.
This concept challenged the prevailing belief that trade should only occur when a country has an absolute advantage in all goods, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the benefits of international trade and specialization.
To learn more about economy click here:
/brainly.com/question/14987476
#SPJ11
What was the result of McCarthy's beliefs (McCarthyism)?
O The United States made peace with the Soviet Union.
O Many people were accused of being communists and were blacklisted or lost their jobs.
O Communists in the United States gained popularity.
O Many people were accused of being communists but were allowed to continue to hold their government jobs.
The result of McCarthy's belief was that many people were accused of being communists and were blacklisted or lost their jobs. Thus, the statement "Many people were accused of being communists and were blacklisted or lost their jobs" is the correct statement.
What happened to people who were accused of being communists?Making erroneous or unsubstantiated charges of treason and subversion, particularly in relation to anarchism, communism, and socialism, and especially when done in a visible and attention-grabbing way, is known as McCarthyism. The crackdowns on suspected communists caused many people to lose their jobs, ruin their careers, and lose their means of support; some even ended themselves in jail.
The majority of these retaliations were sparked by decisions in court cases that were later reversed, by legislation that was later ruled unconstitutional, or by dismissals for reasons that were later shown to be unlawful or actionable.
Learn more about McCarthyism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3283958
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELPPP!!! Why was there a civil war again after Julius Caesar’s death?
Answer:
here..
Explanation:
Caesar's Civil War resulted from the long political subversion of the Roman Government's institutions, which began with the career of Tiberius Gracchus, continuing with the Marian reforms of the legions, the bloody dictatorship of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, and completed by the First Triumvirate over Rome.
Explanation:
Caesar's Civil War (49–45 BC) was one of the last politico-military conflicts in the Roman Republic before the establishment of the Roman Empire. It began as a series of political and military confrontations, between Julius Caesar (100–44 BC), his political supporters (broadly known as Populares), and his legions, against the Optimates (or Boni), the politically conservative and socially traditionalist faction of the Roman Senate,[3] who were supported by Pompey (106–48 BC) and his legions.[4]
Why does Paine object to the idea of being ruled by a monarchy?
what was the first permanent colony established in present-day u.s. territory?
The first permanent English colony established in present-day U.S. territory was Jamestown Colony, Virginia, which was founded in 1607. The colony was located on the banks of the James River.
Jamestown was established by the Virginia Company, a joint stock company chartered by King James I of England, as a business venture to exploit the economic potential of the New World. Despite facing numerous challenges, including disease, conflict with the local Powhatan Native American tribe, and food shortages, the settlers at Jamestown persevered and laid the foundation for the future growth and expansion of the English colonies in North America. Over the next several decades, additional English settlements were established along the Atlantic coast, including the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the Plymouth Colony, and the New Haven Colony, which would eventually form the basis for the 13 British colonies that declared independence from Britain in 1776 and became the United States of America.
To read more about Jamestown colony, click here: https://brainly.com/question/30228438
#SPJ4
ANSWER BOTH ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
a and d
Explanation:
TIME REMAINING
51:27
In the early 1800s, how was the belief in Manifest Destiny most likely to affect the admission of new states into the Union?
The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that slavery was likely to spread to all the territories as they became new states.
The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that European nations were likely to give up their claims to territories to avoid a battle over slavery.
The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that the United States was destined to outlaw slavery in all new states.
The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that the balance between free and slave states could shift as the United States expanded to the Pacific coast.
Answer:
the balance between free and slave states could shift as the United States expanded to the Pacific coast
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that the balance between free and slave states could shift as the United States expanded to the Pacific coast. Manifest Destiny was the 19th-century belief that the United States was destined to expand across the entire continent, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. The idea was grounded in the belief that American expansion was not only inevitable but also a divine right. The concept was that America was destined to spread its political and economic systems throughout North America. Manifest Destiny had a major impact on the admission of new states to the Union. In the early 1800s, the balance between free and slave states was an important issue. The belief in Manifest Destiny meant that as the United States expanded to the Pacific coast, the balance between free and slave states could shift. This was a major concern, and debates over the issue of slavery in new states and territories played a significant role in American politics.
Explanation:
Is this statement true or false?
The Toleration Act barred all religious freedoms to Dissenters.
true
false
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is: False
"It allowed most dissenters – though not all – the freedom to worship publicly, provided they took a simplified version of the oath of allegiance."
1. what does karl marx mean by the social conflict paradigm? what is the proletariat's role in the social conflict paradigm? what is the bourgeois' role in the social conflict paradigm?
Karl Marx's social conflict paradigm refers to the theory that society is in a constant state of conflict due to the competition for limited resources. In this paradigm, the proletariat and the bourgeois play opposing roles.
The proletariat's role in the social conflict paradigm is that of the working class, who sell their labor to the bourgeois in exchange for wages. They do not own the means of production (factories, land, etc.) and are considered to be at a disadvantage in the social hierarchy.
According to Marx, the proletariat is in constant struggle against the bourgeois for better working conditions, higher wages, and a fair share of the wealth generated by their labor.
On the other hand, the bourgeois' role in the social conflict paradigm is that of the ruling class who own the means of production. They profit from the labor of the proletariat by paying them wages that are lower than the value of the goods and services produced by their labor.
This allows the bourgeois to accumulate wealth and maintain their dominant position in society.
Marx believed that the social conflict paradigm would ultimately lead to a revolution, where the proletariat would rise up against the bourgeois and seize control of the means of production. This would result in the establishment of a classless, communist society where resources are distributed equally among all members.
In summary, the social conflict paradigm, as described by Karl Marx, is a constant state of conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeois due to the competition for limited resources. The proletariat's role is that of the working class struggling for better conditions, while the bourgeois' role is that of the ruling class profiting from the proletariat's labor.
To know more about paradigm refer here: https://brainly.com/question/29004769#
#SPJ11
what was russian revolution?
explain properly!
Answer:
The Russian Revolution took place in 1917, during the final phase of World War I. It removed Russia from the war and brought about the transformation of the Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), replacing Russia's traditional monarchy with the world's first Communist state.
Explanation:
the chief motivation for the settling of new england was
The main motivation for the settling of New England was religious freedom. Colonists were searching for a place where they could practice their religion without persecution. Economic opportunity and the desire for land were also factors that influenced the settling of New England.
In the early 17th century, English colonists arrived in America with different motives. The Pilgrims, Puritans, and other religious groups sought freedom from persecution and the ability to practice their religion as they saw fit. Religious persecution was a significant issue in Europe during this time, and many colonists saw America as an opportunity to escape religious oppression. This is why religious freedom was the primary motivation for the settling of New England.
However, economic opportunity and the desire for land were also factors that influenced the settling of New England. Additionally, New England was a desirable location for farming, and colonists saw it as a place where they could establish themselves as landowners. Overall, the settling of New England was influenced by a combination of religious, economic, and social factors.
The Pilgrims, Puritans, and other religious groups sought freedom from persecution and the ability to practice their religion without interference. The desire for religious freedom was the primary motivation for the settling of New England. The Pilgrims and Puritans saw America as an opportunity to establish a new society based on their religious beliefs. They wanted to create a community where they could practice their religion as they saw fit and establish a government based on their moral principles. They saw America as a new beginning, a place where they could create a society that was free from the corruption and tyranny they experienced in England.
In conclusion, the main motivation for the settling of New England was religious freedom. However, economic opportunity and the desire for land were also important factors that influenced the decision of colonists to leave for the New World. These factors contributed to the establishment of a new society that was founded on religious freedom, economic opportunity, and social mobility.
To know more about pilgrims, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7161042
#SPJ11
In what way did the Declaration of Sentiments express support for women?
A. It statedB. that men and women are equal.
B. It asked for equal pay for men and womCen.
C. It endorsed overall safety in the home for women.
D. It demanded women be appointed to jobs in government.
Answer:
It stated that men and women are equal.
Explanation:
The Declaration of Sentiments was one of the most important historical document that contributed to the success of Women'[s suffrage movement.
The documents in the Declaration of sentiments highlighted the hypocrisy that exist within the Declaration of Independence. The first draft of the declaration of Independence specifically mentioned that the human rights that exist in the Declaration of Independence were only given to Men.
The establishment of The Declaration of Sentiments gained various support nationwide. It increased the amount of people (both men and women) who supported women's right to vote.
Hope this helps! ;)
."We have pacified some thousands of the islanders and buried them; destroyed their fields; burned their villages, and turned their widows and orphans out-of-doors; subjugated the remaining ten millions by Benevolent assimilation. … And so, by these Providences of God – and the phrase is the government’s, not mine – we are a World Power."
Q: The statement above was most probably made in reference to United States policy in the:
opening of Japan.
acquisition of Puerto Rico and Cuba.
annexation of the Hawaiian islands.
occupation of the Philippines.
The statement above reflects the United States' imperialist policies towards the Philippines at the turn of the 20th century. It highlights the use of violence and force to subjugate a population, as well as a belief in American exceptionalism and divine providence.
The statement above is attributed to an American politician and military leader, General Jacob H. Smith, and is a reflection of the United States' policy towards a particular group of people in a specific context. The statement describes the use of violence and force to subjugate and control a population, and highlights a belief in American exceptionalism and divine providence.
The statement was most likely made in reference to the United States' occupation of the Philippines in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. After defeating Spain in the Spanish-American War of 1898, the United States acquired the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The acquisition of these territories marked a significant shift in American foreign policy towards imperialism and territorial expansion.
General Jacob H. Smith was a military commander in the Philippines during the Philippine-American War, which lasted from 1899 to 1902. The war was fought between the United States and Filipino nationalists who were seeking independence from colonial rule. General Smith's statement reflects the brutal tactics used by the United States military to suppress the Filipino rebellion, which included massacres of civilians and the destruction of villages.
The phrase ""Benevolent assimilation"" used in the statement was a euphemism used by the United States government to describe their policy towards the Philippines. It referred to the idea that the United States was bringing civilization and modernity to the Philippines, while at the same time assimilating them into American culture and values.
Click the below link, to learn more about island:
https://brainly.com/question/22069056
#SPJ11
Why was the Gilded Age also a turbulent time?
Answer:
These were turbulent years that saw labor violence, rising racial tension, militancy among farmers, and discontent among the unemployed.
Explanation:
Question is attached in the image below
Answer:
grassland and savannah that borders the desert area of the Sahara
Explanation:
look it up :)
Whose interpretation of the Constitution (Hamilton/Jefferson) do you think is best?
Hamilton maintained that “an interpretation that destroys the very attribute of the authorities cannot be just.”
Hamilton's huge interpretation of the Constitution used to be illegitimate due to the fact it distorted the government's nature by using treating it as a standard provide of powers.
How did Hamilton and Jefferson fluctuate in their interpretation of the Constitution?Alexander Hamilton grew to be a leading voice of the Federalists who believed that the federal government needed to be strong. On the different side, Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, argued that too an awful lot strength in the arms of the federal authorities would lead to tyranny.
Learn more about interpretation of the Constitution by Hamilton/Jefferson here:
https://brainly.com/question/24514547#SPJ9Question select all the correct answers. what are the three vs of big data? -volume -validity -variety -velocity -vitality
Volume, Velocity, and Variety
How is the relationship between the American Colonies and Britain similar to that of McDonald's franchises?
Answer:
McDonald's has stores in all kinds of territories across several countries in the world like the British Empire had colonies in places like the Americas and India. Individual McDonald's stores cannot do their own thing, buy a different fryer or use a different recipe. They are required to follow protocol that goes up a chain of command of managers up to the CEO of McDonald's which would be the King of England in this case. This a funny correlation to make.
Explanation:
justinian created a law code that would last for over 1,000 years in eastern europe. it was known as the
Justinian created a law code that would last for over 1,000 years in Eastern Europe. It was known as the Corpus Juris Civilis. It is significant not just because of its contents but also because it preserved the civil law of the Roman Empire, which had a substantial impact on the development of law in Western Europe.
What was the Corpus Juris Civilis?The Corpus Juris Civilis was a comprehensive collection of civil laws that had a significant impact on the history of jurisprudence. It was created between 529 and 534 AD by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I.The Corpus Juris Civilis consisted of four works, each of which had a particular purpose. The Institutes presented an introduction to legal principles, while the Digest contained rulings from famous Roman lawyers. The Codex Justinianus contained imperial statutes, and the Novellae contained later legislative developments.Justinian was not the first ruler to create a codified law, but his was the most complete, and it became the foundation for the legal systems of modern European countries such as Italy and Germany.Justinian's work has had a profound influence on the development of Western jurisprudence. It is significant not just because of its contents but also because it preserved the civil law of the Roman Empire, which had a substantial impact on the development of law in Western Europe.
For more such questions on Eastern europe
https://brainly.com/question/13160251
#SPJ11
El Salvador became the first country to adopt bitcoin as a legal
tender on 7 Sept 2021.
Do you think this is the right move? And why?
I do not think that this was a very gopd move. This is due to the fluctuation and high volatility and the behavior of the coin.
Why is this a bad ideaConcerns include the volatility of Bitcoin, regulatory challenges, and ensuring access and education for all citizens. The long-term success of this decision will depend on effective regulation, managing risks, and addressing the challenges associated with cryptocurrencies.
Given the challenges that comes with the regulation as well as the fact that it is controlled by peers, this may not be a good move
Read more on bitcoin here https://brainly.com/question/9170439
#SPJ4
A radical republican  in Congress would have likely respond to Lincoln‘s proclamation  by arguing that
Answer:
A radical republican in Congress would likely have argued that Lincoln's proclamation did not go far enough. They would have likely argued that all slaves in the Confederacy should be immediately freed and provided citizenship rights, as slavery had not been explicitly abolished in the declaration. They would have argued that such a declaration should have been made sooner, rather than allowing slavery to continue as long as it had. They would have also argued that the proclamation should be extended to all states as well, rather than just the Confederate states.
Explanation:
This political cartoon suggests that the League of Nations worked mainly to support the needs of the United States. Would collapse without the participation of the United States. Was formed to protect other countries from the United States. Did not need the United States to form a link between nations.
Answer: Would collapse without the participation of the United States.
Explanation:
There is no cartoon attached but this should be the correct answer. The League of Nations was formed on the advice of the American President at the time, Woodrow Wilson.
Congress however refused to join the League of Nations which meant that the world's largest industrial power was not a member of the League and so many people predicted, as was done in this cartoon, that the League would not be able to survive without American participation.
Answer:
would collapse without the participation of the United States.
Explanation:
I got it right
i am doing a project on african american heroes but i don't know who to pick so tell me who i should research about pls and thank you
Martin Robison would be the best! He was a journalist, soldier, and a fantastic writer! Martin was a wonderful guy, I think you should do him! He was a GREAT hero!
Hope This Helps! Have A GREAT Day!What can identifying perspective and point of view help you to do? (Site 1)
Answer:
You can use perspective in all points of view to help define your narrator's attitude and personality. The character's perspective affects how he feels about certain experiences or other characters.
Explanation: