Please Help!!

Choose either John D. Rockefeller or Andrew Carnegie & explain their role with the rise of trusts and monopolies. Write 4-5 sentences

Answer: Christopher Columbus landed at Cuba in 1492 and claimed the land for Spain. Columbus named the land Isla Juana, but later it would be called Cuba, which comes from the local Native American name of coabana. The first Spanish settlement on Cuba was Baracoa which was founded by Diego Velazquez de Cuellar in 1511.

Explanation:

Isla Juana that is the a n s w e r o k d vf

Answer:

The Canadian government in the late 1800s was actively recruiting American farmers to move north. Chinese immigrants heading to Canada during the gold rush and later to work on railway construction often came by land and sea from cities along the American west coast.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Common Sense is a 47-page pamphlet written by Thomas Paine in 1775–1776 advocating independence from Great Britain to people in the Thirteen Colonies. Writing in clear and persuasive prose, Paine marshaled moral and political arguments to encourage common people in the Colonies to fight for egalitarian government.

Answer:

Texas wins

Explanation:

read what the other person said burning an American flag has been illegal for 100s of years. It is like burning a bible. Johnson shouldn't win the case.

The Napoleon's attitude towards his role as emperor refers to that, he crowned himself in the 1804. As he was the ambitious and skilled.

The term empire refers that the several territories that come under one political unit be there as we see there are many villages as we see city and states are being there that comes to countries in the same way the empire is there for the different religions and many empires are there in it.

He crowned himself crowned head in 1804. Shrewd, challenging and an accomplished military strategist, Napoleon with success waged war against various alignments of European nations and enlarged his empire.

Therefore, As a result, the Napoleon's attitude towards his empire was very ambitious.

Learn more about empire here:

https://brainly.com/question/977538

#SPJ1

What does Renaissance Mean?

The name ‘renaissance’ is a French word translating to rebirth. It symbolised the beginning of a new era of art, rebirthing the classical models of Ancient Greek and Rome periods while using the modern techniques.

When did this era begin?

There is not an exact date of the beginning of the Renaissance period, but it was rumoured to begin in the period from 1350 until the year 1400. Starting in Florence, Italy, before spreading out to the rest of the country. Prior to the Renaissance period, in the middle ages, people thought life should and always be hard. It was a world filled with war and hard work, with citizens working themselves into the ground until they perished. However, by the 1300s, the people of Florence began to think differently. Studying the past lives of the Greeks and Romans, they realised that life could be done in another way, which introduced the new way of thinking called humanism. Using the comforts of life, reawakening art, culture, science, technology, and music to bring more joy into life. As Italy was a considerably wealthy country at the time, it was easy for them to extravagantly spend their money on the finer things of life, cultivating humanism quickly. Wealthy merchants hired artisans and craftspeople more frequently. As well as competitions among artists and thinkers occurring more frequently. Art began to flourish, and new thoughts began to emerge. With the entire continent spending more and more money on the fine arts. This began the foundation for the European age of exploration, which soon led to Europe’s global power.

How long did the Renaissance period last?

The end of the Renaissance period ties in directly with Florence’s decline. It first began with the invasion of Florence by France in 1494, as well as Italy,  breaking into warfare between its city-states. The introduction of the Renaissance gave birth to many political and intellectual movements, with the era having a large backlash. By the 1550s, many of the artworks and literature that helped developed the Renaissance were banned. And by the mid-1550s, the Renaissance was over completely in Italy. However, it was live alive across Europe, with other country’s growing this era even after Italian’s end.

The given statement "The Romanov royal family and several of their retainers are executed" is True because The Romanov royal family, including the Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra.

Their daughters Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia, their son Alexei, and several of their servants, were executed by a Bolshevik firing squad in the basement of Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg, Siberia. On the evening of July 16, 1918, the prisoners were awakened and taken to the basement where a makeshift firing squad awaited them.

The Tsar and Tsarina were shot first, followed by their four daughters. Their son Alexei was the last to be executed. After the executions, their bodies were taken out to the nearby forest and burned by the execution squad in an effort to cover up the crime. Thus, the Bolsheviks had brutally ended the 300-year Romanov dynasty.

To know more about Romanov dynasty., click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10185194

#SPJ4

The Question-

The Romanov royal family and several of their retainers are executed by a Bolshevik firing squad in the basement of Ipatiev House, in Yekaterinburg, Siberia

T/F

In the 1980s, mikhail gorbachev instituted a policy of economic restructuring in the soviet union called perestroika, the given statement is true.

In the late 1980s, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) underwent a political reform movement known as perestroika. It was strongly influenced by CPSU general secretary Mikhail Gorbachev's reform of the glasnost (Greek for "openness") doctrine. Perestroika, which means "reconstruction" in its literal sense, refers to the Soviet Union's political and economic system being reorganized in an effort to end the Era of Stagnation.

The Perestroika enacted numerous market-like changes and gave various ministries more freedom to act independently. Perestroika's purported objective, however, was not to abolish the command economy but to improve the efficiency of socialism in order to better serve the needs of Soviet citizens.

learn more about perestroika here

https://brainly.com/question/16320995

#SPJ4

Answer:

they could be kidnapped and sold into slavery.

Explanation:

Answer:

Free African Americans were rarely accepted into white society. Some states applied their slave codes to free African Americans as well. Perhaps the most horrifying prospect was kidnapping. Slave catchers would sometimes abduct free African Americans and force them back into slavery.

Explanation:

Answer:

lower taxes for the wealthy

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Took the test

For generations, Jews across the globe have embraced a common, master narrative of Jewish migration in modern times that traces its origins to widespread acts of anti-Jewish violence, often referred to as pogroms, that propelled millions of Jews from the dark hinterlands of Eastern Europe into the warm, supportive embrace of their current, “Western” societies, ranging from the United States to Israel to Australia. In North America, Israel, and other new (or at the very least renewed) Jewish communities, definitive bastions of Jewish memory, society, and culture – like The National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and Beit Hatfutsot: The Museum of the Jewish People on Tel Aviv University's campus – tell and retell a widely-accepted narrative of Jewish migration in which Jews who flee violence and oppression in Eastern Europe are rescued, if not saved, by the very act of migration. In these, and innumerable other cases, Jewish migration in the modern era is repeatedly presented as a willful act of secular self-salvation. Mirroring and at times even bolstering the story of the biblical Exodus from ancient Egypt, these modern, secular versions of traditional Jewish accounts of slavery, flight, and redemption repeatedly serve as fundamental components of contemporary Jewish society, culture, and self.

In response to the prevailing influence of these and related myths of Jewish crisis, flight, and rescue, scholars as definitive as Salo Baron have long argued that the predominance of the so-called lachrymose conception of Jewish history ultimately warps popular and academic conceptions of both the Jewish past and present. As Baron noted in a retrospective essay first published in 1963: “[ … ] an overemphasis on Jewish sufferings distorted the total picture of the Jewish historic evolution and, at the same time, badly served a generation which had become impatient with the nightmare of endless persecutions and massacres.”1 Despite these and related attempts to revise the lachrymose conception of Jewish history as well as the large-scale social, political, and economic changes that have changed the very face of Jewish society over the past century and a half, the traditional historical paradigm of persecution, flight, and refuge continues to shape popular and even scholarly accounts of Jewish migration and history in modern times.2 The continued salience of this master narrative touches upon several key methodological questions in the study of Jewish migration and history. The first issue that the prominent place of anti-Jewish persecution and violence raises is the problematic, long-debated place of antisemitism as both a defining characteristic and driving force in the long course of Jewish history.3 A second issue related to the prominent place of anti-Jewish violence in popular and academic interpretations of Jewish history, in particular, and of European history, in general, is a parallel tendency to view the vast terrain of Eastern Europe as an area pre-destined to, if not defined by, inter-ethnic tensions, hatred, and violence.4 Lastly, the persecution, flight, and rescue narrative of Jewish migration and history very often ends up bolstering triumphalist views of the Jewish present, whether they be embraced and touted in New York, Tel Aviv, or Toronto.

Answer:

Most of them did not like the idea of black civil rights. They were opposed to the civil rights movement and to racial equality. But they weren't opposed enough to join the clan or to be violent about it. They were more grudging and reluctant and halting.

Explanation:

Dark moths began to outnumber white moths in cities after the Industrial Revolution because Light-colored moths were less favored for survival in the new environment.

People began to note that as the industrial revolution progressed, black moths were considerably more prevalent and white moths became much uncommon. One of the first people to look at this perplexing shift in abundance was Bernard Kettlewell, a research fellow at the University of Oxford. In the 1950s, he carried out a sophisticated series of studies to determine whether black moths were better able to blend in with their more polluted environment due to industrialization, but white moths were less able to do so and more susceptible to bird predation.

To know more about Industrial Revolution

brainly.com/question/7154211

#SPJ4

Answer:

The correct answer is public sympathy. President Lyndon B Johnson convinced the US Congress to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 after Kennedy's assassination.

Explanation:

Ito Hirobumi believed that the Meiji Restoration was critical for Japan's survival and prosperity, as it allowed the country to compete with the West by adopting Western methods of governance. He played a key role in the development of Japan's political, legal, and administrative systems during this period.

Ito Hirobumi's point of view on the Meiji RestorationIto Hirobumi was one of the key architects of Japan's political, legal, and administrative transformation from a feudal shogunate to a modern constitutional monarchy. He played a significant part in Japan's modernization and political development in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.The Meiji Restoration was the culmination of a long-standing internal struggle in Japan.

It was a period of political upheaval that resulted in the overthrow of the Tokugawa shogunate and the establishment of the Meiji Emperor as the de facto leader of Japan. Ito Hirobumi's perspective on the Meiji Restoration can be understood in the context of his role in the political developments that followed it.Ito Hirobumi, a samurai from Choshu, was a proponent of the Meiji Restoration. He viewed the restoration as a way to revitalize Japan and rid it of foreign influence.

Hirobumi saw the Meiji Restoration as an opportunity to create a unified Japan with a centralized government and to adopt Western methods of governance to compete with the West. He thought that Japan's traditional institutions were ineffective and incapable of competing with the West, which had gained a significant advantage through industrialization and modernization. According to Hirobumi, the Meiji Restoration was critical to Japan's survival and prosperity, and he played a significant part in shaping the political and legal systems that emerged in Japan during the Meiji period.

For more such questions on Ito Hirobumi, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/1832256

#SPJ8

The best civilization to choose in Rise of Kingdoms 2022 is the Chinese civilization.

This civilization has a powerful military and an expansive technology tree, allowing for great flexibility in how you want to build your city. The Chinese civilization also has strong defensive capabilities, which will make it harder for other players to attack you.

Additionally, the Chinese civilization has many advantages when it comes to gathering resources, allowing you to quickly accumulate the necessary resources for your city.

Lastly, the Chinese civilization has access to powerful units and commanders, making it easier to build up your army and prepare for battle. All of these factors make the Chinese civilization an excellent choice for those looking to succeed in Rise of Kingdoms 2022.

For more questions like Chinese click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/3859342

#SPJ4

Answer:

Algonquian Indians

They hunted for deer, moose, and small game, and went fishing in the rivers and lakes. Some Algonquin communities grew corn and squash in small gardens, but most Algonquins only got foods like those in trade with neighboring tribes. Besides fish and meat, the Algonquins gathered berries and wild plants to eat.

extra: Languages spoken: Algonquin language; French language

Answer:

Mutsuhito

Explanation:

During the Meji era from January 25, 1868 – July 30, 1912 Emperor Meiji Mutsuhito ruled Japan.

Who ruled Japan during the Meiji era? ​

Answer:

Mutsuhito

Answer:

(1) large population centers; (2) monumental architecture and unique art styles; (3) shared communication strategies; (4) systems for administering territories

Hope this helps fellow friend!

An important and bloody part of Aztec sacred rituals was the ceremony known as the "Feast of Huitzilopochtli".

To appease Huitzilopochtli, the Aztec god of the sun and war, the hearts of sacrificial victims were required to be ritually cut out. These victims were often slaves or prisoners of war. To ensure the daily rising and continued existence of the Sun, the purpose of the ritual was to feed him.

The ritual was considered an essential obligation to maintain the cosmic balance and prevent the world from descending into darkness. The Aztecs believed that by donating a human heart, they could preserve the cosmic order and guarantee the survival of their civilization.

Learn more about Huitzilopochtli, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14786867

#SPJ4

The three traits that can be used to differentiate humans from our closest living primate relatives are large brain size,
extensive tool use, bipedality, which is the ability to walk exclusively on two legs

The traits that can be used to differentiate humans from our closest living primate relatives are bipedality, large brain size, and extensive tool use. While both humans and primates have grasping hands, this trait alone is not enough to distinguish between the two.
Bipedality, which is the ability to walk exclusively on two legs, is a unique characteristic of humans. While some primates can walk on two legs for short distances, they are not able to do so exclusively. Bipedality is believed to have evolved in humans as a way to free up our hands for tool use and other activities.


Humans are known for their extensive tool use. While some primates also use tools, the complexity and variety of human tools far exceeds that of any other primate species. Tool use has played a critical role in human evolution, enabling us to adapt to a wide range of environments and to develop complex societies.

Hands are a common trait shared by both humans and primates, bipedality, large brain size, and extensive tool use are all characteristics that differentiate us from our closest living primate relatives.

To know more about bipedality visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29359273

#SPJ11

The passage from the Declaration of Independence best illustrates the principle of popular sovereignty, which holds that the people are the ultimate source of political power and authority.

The passage asserts that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, meaning that the authority of the government is derived from the people it governs. Furthermore, it asserts that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that becomes destructive of the ends it was instituted to serve, and to institute a new government in its place. This implies that the people have the power to create and shape their own government, and that the government exists to serve the people rather than the other way around. This idea of popular sovereignty was a foundational principle of the American Revolution and remains a core tenet of American political thought to this day.

To learn more about Declaration of Independence, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14578050

#SPJ11

Answer: Well first off, Canadian money is worth more, so for example, 2 dollars in the U.S. would be like 3 in Canada (not actually that's just an example) I wouldn't say it's a difference in living standard just a currency worth difference.

Explanation:

The Japanese feudal system was established at the end of the Heian period by two main groups: the warrior class, or samurai, and the ruling aristocracy.

The first group was the imperial court, which had been the central authority in Japan for centuries. However, by the end of the Heian period, the court had lost much of its power and influence, and local lords and samurai had gained significant autonomy.
The second group that played a crucial role in establishing the feudal system was the samurai. As local lords gained more power, they needed a way to protect themselves and their lands. They turned to the samurai, who were skilled warriors and could provide protection in exchange for payment.
Together, these two groups established the Japanese feudal system, which lasted for several centuries until the Meiji Restoration in the late 19th century. The system was characterized by a rigid social hierarchy, with the emperor at the top and peasants at the bottom, and by the exchange of goods and services for loyalty and protection.

Know more about the Japanese feudal system

https://brainly.com/question/23022410

#SPJ11

International trade shape early American history trade brought small countries to world prominence, stimulated technological innovation and built international dynasties.

The American's have the world's largest economy and the largest export system and import system of goods and services. Trade is censorious to America's prosperity fueling economic growth, assisting good jobs at home, increasing living standards and helping Americans grants for their families with affordable goods and services.

The America has invested them to break down trade barriers over the globe through a broad range of institutions and concurrence.

International trade is major because it is the trades of goods and services internationally. Other nations have assets that we do not have and through international trade we are able to get them here. Tariff is a tax set on goods that one country imports from another.

To know more about trade here

brainly.com/question/13989926

#SPJ1