Phillip is standing trial for robbery. His overall ability to adequately take care of himself and his ability to understand what is going on at trial have come into question. Before he goes to trial, it is important to assess whether he:
A) can be rehabilitated in incarceration. B) can afford to pay for a private attorney. C) is competent to stand trial.
D) has realistic chances for an acquittal.

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Answer:

C the sheriff

Explanation:

The Americans with Disabilities Act and related federal and state laws prohibit illegal discrimination against people with disabilities.

         The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, also known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101), is a civil rights law that prohibits disability discrimination. It provides Americans with disabilities with similar anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1], which made discrimination based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and other characteristics illegal, and later sexual orientation. Furthermore, unlike the Civil Rights Act, the ADA requires covered employers to make reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, as well as imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations. [2] The National Council on Disability recommended the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1986, and the first version of the bill was introduced in the House and Senate in 1987.

To learn more about Americans with Disabilities Act:

https://brainly.com/question/2561827

#SPJ4

A) People with disabilities cannot be subjected to unlawful discrimination, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act and associated federal and state legislation.

Disability discrimination is illegal under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, generally known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101). It gives people with disabilities the same anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on sexual orientation and later, race, religion, gender, and other factors.

The ADA also imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations, unlike the Civil Rights Act, and compels eligible companies to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was initially proposed in the House and Senate in 1987 after being recommended for adoption by the National Council on Disability in 1986.

Learn more about the Americans with Disabilities Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/2561827

#SPJ4

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

The First Amendment recognizes the use of parody, comedy, or satire as fair use. The correct option is c.

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows for the limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright owner for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

Parody, comedy, and satire are often considered to be transformative uses of copyrighted material, meaning that they add new meaning or value to the original work. As such, they are more likely to be considered fair use than other types of uses.

The First Amendment provides important protections for free speech and artistic expression, and the recognition of parody, comedy, and satire as fair use is one example of how these protections are applied in the context of copyright law. Therefore, the correct option is c.

To know more about parody here:

https://brainly.com/question/30131449

#SPJ4

Answer:

Natural Right

Explanation:

The answer is Natural right

Answer:

Natural rights

hope this helps :}

Under the Statute of Frauds, Train cannot compel specific performance because the agreement was not in writing and signed by Nolan.

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the parties involved to be enforceable.

In this case, the agreement between Nolan and Train regarding the sale of the house for $100,000 was not in writing and signed by Nolan. Therefore, Train cannot compel specific performance, which is a legal remedy that requires a party to fulfill their obligations under a contract.

Train may have other legal options, such as seeking damages for breach of contract or arguing that there was partial performance by allowing Train to move into the house.

However, without a written and signed agreement, it is unlikely that Train can compel specific performance under the Statute of Frauds.

learn more about obligations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29437673

#SPJ11

Answer:

cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.

pros: no prison

Explanation:

sorry....too complex for a non law student

Answer:

Explanation:

Sources of law do not include instructions from the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce. While the Chamber of Commerce can provide guidance and recommendations to its members and the community, it does not have the legal authority to create or enforce laws.

The sources of law in this scenario include:

The new state constitution approved by voters in North Carolina. This is a fundamental source of law that establishes the framework for government and the legal system.

The new ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council. These are local laws that are created and enforced by the city government.

The new rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation. These are administrative regulations that are created by government agencies to implement and enforce laws and policies.

Overall, sources of law include constitutional provisions, statutory law, administrative law, and common law, which are created through court decisions. Instructions or guidance from private entities such as the Chamber of Commerce do not hold the force of law.

Yes, voters in North Carolina approved a new state constitution.

This new constitution affects many aspects of law, including ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council, rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation, and instructions sent out by the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce.

Sources of law do not include the new state constitution, ordinances, rules, and instructions mentioned above, but rather come from the U.S. Constitution, state laws, state court decisions, and federal laws and regulations.

These sources are all recognized as legitimate forms of law and can be used to help interpret and make decisions.

To know more about federal laws click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14867447#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Option Contract

Explanation:

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties. In contract law, the agreement to keep an offer open for a certain period of time, within which the contract cannot be revoked by the offeror is known as an Option contract. This must be supported by the offeree's consideration.

If the offeree rejects the agreement, then his right of acceptance has been terminated in most jurisdictions. Other factors that can result in the termination of the offeree's power of acceptance include; a counter offer by the offeree, an expiration of the offer, and a conditional acceptance by the offeree.

Answer:

vehicle condition

Explanation:

if the brakes on a car are all messed up it'll make stopping alot harder.

If you are in a boating accident involving death or disappearance, you must file a written report within 48 hours of the incident.

Under federal and state laws, boating accidents involving death or disappearance must be reported to the authorities as soon as possible. The report must be in writing and submitted to the state boating authority within 48 hours of the incident.

The written report must include details about the accident, such as the time, date, and location, the names and contact information of all involved parties, a description of the vessel, and any injuries or fatalities. The report may also include witness statements, diagrams, and photographs of the accident scene.

Failing to report a boating accident involving death or disappearance can result in civil and criminal penalties, such as fines, imprisonment, and revocation of boating privileges. Reporting the accident promptly and accurately is crucial for conducting a thorough investigation, determining the cause of the accident, and ensuring the safety of other boaters on the water.

To know more about written report, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21297395#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Due process

Explanation:

Everyone has a right to an attorney, rich or poor.
There must be fair treatment in the system so no matter who you are or what you've done, you will be appointed an attorney because the law states you have a right to one.

Due process; fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.

To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False

A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.

A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.

When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.

Learn more about notarizing document :

brainly.com/question/14477099

#SPJ1

In Green v. Ford Motor Company, 942 N.E.2d 791 (Ind. Sup. Ct. 2011), the Indiana Supreme Court held that in crashworthiness cases alleging enhanced injuries, the plaintiff's alleged negligence in operating the vehicle was not relevant in determining whether Ford negligently designed the restrain system.

This means that even if the plaintiff may have been partially at fault for the initial accident, Ford can still be held liable for any enhanced injuries caused by their faulty design. The court also held that a finder of fact shall apportion fault to the person suffering physical harm when that alleged fault relates to the cause of the underlying accident. This means that if the plaintiff's alleged fault is found to be related to the cause of the accident, it may be considered in determining the allocation of fault and damages. However, this does not absolve Ford from any liability for the enhanced injuries caused by its faulty design. Overall, the ruling in Green v. Ford Motor Company highlights the importance of crashworthiness and the responsibility of automobile manufacturers to design and produce safe vehicles that protect occupants in the event of an accident.

Learn more about crashworthiness here:

https://brainly.com/question/27906335

#SPJ11

Answer:

The best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab would be through personal delivery. Shipments through mail may be lost or misplaced, causing a contamination of the evidence and rendering it useless. The safe transportation of the evidence to a crime lab can only be assured through personal delivery.

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

a. Neither - The FCC was created in 1934 with the passage of the Communications Act.

b. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its local telephone companies, which became known as the Baby Bells.

c. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - The Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) was created as part of the divestiture of AT&T.

d. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act allowed cable television companies to provide local telephone service and compete with traditional telephone companies.

e. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act introduced competition in the long-distance telephone market and allowed customers to choose between different long-distance providers.

f. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its technology division, which became known as Lucent Technologies.

Learn more about FCC here:

https://brainly.com/question/29890205

#SPJ11

In most states, the maximum fine for a first DUI conviction for a person aged 21 or older can vary. However, in general, the fine ranges from $500 to $2,000.

Along with the fine, the person may also face other penalties, such as license suspension, mandatory alcohol education classes, and community service. The severity of the penalty can also depend on factors such as the person's blood alcohol content (BAC) at the time of arrest and whether there were any injuries or property damage involved. It is important to note that DUI convictions can have long-lasting consequences on a person's life, including difficulty finding employment, higher car insurance rates, and limitations on travel. As such, it is crucial to avoid driving under the influence and make responsible decisions when it comes to alcohol consumption.

To learn more about convictions, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29832649

#SPJ11

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

Answer:

children and adolescents (1 to 19 years of age) represented a quarter of the total estimated U.S. population1; reflecting relatively good health, they accounted for less than 2% of all U.S. deaths.2 By 2016, death among children and adolescents had become a rare event. Declines in deaths from infectious disease or cancer, which had resulted from early diagnosis, vaccinations, antibiotics, and medical and surgical treatment, had given way to increases in deaths from injury-related causes, including motor vehicle crashes, firearm injuries, and the emerging problem of opioid overdoses. Although injury deaths have traditionally been viewed as “accidents,” injury-prevention science that evolved during the latter half of the 20th century increasingly shows that such deaths are preventable with evidence-based approaches.

Answer:

accidents

Explanation:

Answer: A person who is suing for battery does not have to show that they were hurt physically. Instead, the plaintiff must show that the defendant did not have permission to touch him or her or his or her property in a way that was harmful or offensive. By itself, this is considered harmful.

Explanation:

Liability for a defective product can be triggered even when the seller has exercised all possible care in preparation and sale of the product. The correct option is c.

This is because the concept of strict liability applies in product liability cases. This means that regardless of the seller's intent or level of care

They can still be held responsible for any harm caused by a defective product.

t is not necessary for the product to reach the user without a substantial change in its condition, nor is it necessary for the injured party to prove that the product was not received at all.

However, if the seller is not engaged in the business of selling such a product, they may have a defense against liability.

To know more about liability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28391469#

#SPJ11

True, Liberty of Contract Civil liberties replaced liberty of contract as the judicial foundation of freedom by the end to the new deal

The process through which people and organizations enter into contracts without interference from the government is known as freedom of contract. Government controls such as minimum wage laws, rules governing unfair competition, economic punishments, prohibitions on price-fixing, and prohibitions on hiring illegal immigrants are in opposition to this.

The foundation of free-market libertarianism and laissez-faire economics is the freedom to contract. The idea's proponents hold that through "freedom of contract," people have the general freedom to decide with whom to enter into a contract, whether to enter into a contract or not, and the terms on which to do so.

Learn more about liberty of contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/10723226

#SPJ4

Through continuous improvement and investment in performance management practices, Malakoff Corporation Berhad can create a culture of excellence and empower its employees to contribute to the company's success.

Performance management practices play a crucial role in shaping employee satisfaction within organizations. In the case of Malakoff Corporation Berhad, effective performance management practices can have a positive impact on employee satisfaction. These practices involve setting clear performance expectations, providing regular feedback and coaching, conducting fair and objective performance evaluations, and recognizing and rewarding high performance.

To further enhance employee satisfaction through performance management practices, Malakoff Corporation Berhad should consider the following recommendations:

a. Improve clarity and communication: Ensure that performance expectations are communicated clearly and consistently to employees. Provide regular updates on organizational goals and performance criteria to keep employees informed and engaged.

b. Foster a feedback-oriented culture: Encourage managers and supervisors to provide ongoing feedback and coaching to employees. Create a supportive environment where employees feel comfortable seeking and receiving feedback to facilitate their growth and development.

Effective performance management practices have a significant impact on employee satisfaction within Malakoff Corporation Berhad. By implementing clear performance expectations, providing regular feedback and coaching, conducting fair evaluations, and recognizing high performance, the organization can foster a positive work environment that enhances employee satisfaction, engagement, and retention. Through continuous improvement and investment in performance management practices, Malakoff Corporation Berhad can create a culture of excellence and empower its employees to contribute to the company's success.

To know more about investment

brainly.com/question/14921083

#SPJ11